This document discusses different theories on the origins of language knowledge. It presents debates between whether language comes from internal mental processes or external measurable factors. It also outlines various mentalist perspectives, including interactionism, idealism, emergentism, empiricism, and rationalism as well as materialist viewpoints such as epiphenomenalism, reductionism, and functionalism. Finally, it discusses Chomsky's argument that language is innate based on the limited language input children receive and the ease and speed of their language acquisition.
This document discusses different theories on the origins of language knowledge. It presents debates between whether language comes from internal mental processes or external measurable factors. It also outlines various mentalist perspectives, including interactionism, idealism, emergentism, empiricism, and rationalism as well as materialist viewpoints such as epiphenomenalism, reductionism, and functionalism. Finally, it discusses Chomsky's argument that language is innate based on the limited language input children receive and the ease and speed of their language acquisition.
This document discusses different theories on the origins of language knowledge. It presents debates between whether language comes from internal mental processes or external measurable factors. It also outlines various mentalist perspectives, including interactionism, idealism, emergentism, empiricism, and rationalism as well as materialist viewpoints such as epiphenomenalism, reductionism, and functionalism. Finally, it discusses Chomsky's argument that language is innate based on the limited language input children receive and the ease and speed of their language acquisition.
knowledge come from? Intelligence, innate language ideas, behaviour? CHEERELYN T. DELIZON Discussant HOW DO WE ACQUIRE KNOWLEDGE? PERFECT CIRCLES, GOD, AND LANGUAGE
This concept refers to the idea
that some people believe that language knowledge comes from a divine source or is inherently perfect and unchanging. MENTALISM VS. MATERIALISM
This concept refers to the
debate between whether language knowledge comes from external, measurable factors or internal, mental processes. MENTALISM INTERACTIONISM- This is the idea that children learn language through a combination of innate knowledge and interaction with their environment. This can be exemplified by a child learning to speak through interactions with their parents and other caregivers. IDEALISM- This is the idea that language knowledge comes from the mind, and that language is a product of human thought. This can be exemplified by the idea that language is a reflection of the way we think and process information. MENTALISM
EMERGENTISM-This is the idea that language
knowledge is emergent from a complex system, and that it arises from the interaction of simpler components. EMPERICISM-This is the idea that language knowledge comes from our experiences in the world, and that we learn language through observation and experimentation. RATIONALISM- This is the idea that language knowledge comes from innate knowledge or reasoning abilities. MATERIALISM
EPIPHENOMENALISM-This is the idea that
language knowledge is a byproduct of other mental processes, and that it does not play an active role in our thinking. REDUCTIONISM- This is the idea that language knowledge can be reduced to simpler, measurable components. FUNCTIONALISM- This is the idea that language knowledge is determined by its function in communication and interaction. Argument to Chomsky’s Innateness (UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR)
1. Degenerate, meagre, and minute language
input 2. Ease and speed of child language acquisition 3. Irrelevance of intelligence in language learning 4. Simultaneous multilingual and the problem of multiple ssettings of a single parameter THANKYOU!