Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY
AS A COMPANY
VALUE DRIVER
OBJECTIVES
VALUE 02
DRIVER first step on the path toward
deepening investor interest
MODEL in sustainability as a source
of business value
03
can be used as motivational
factor to increase their financial
performance
Sustainability-advantage growth (S/G)
measuring a company’s revenue volume
and growth rate in comparison to their
predecessors and/or competitors
Enhancement of product
03 and service value
01
Operational and
regulatory risk
related to day-to-day business operations, licencing,
environmental impact (pollution and toxic emissions), operating
standards.
Sustainability- 02
Supply chain risk
related risk related to supply of reliable, environmentally sound produce and
03
Reputational risk
negative media coverage, negative legal judgements, etc., that
can be avoided by proactive policies and corporate
communication
01
Researchers advocating the negative relationship state that
implementation costs of CSR are too high compared with the
results obtained (Oh & Park, 2015; Lopez et al., 2007)
CSR and 02
Other group of authors argues that the relationship between CSR
and company performance is rather insignificant on the basis
Business that it is not clear whether this relationship exists at all (Curran
& Moran, 2007; Garcia-Castro et al., 2010)
Performance 03
Majority of the researchers define that the adoption of CSR
activities carried out by companies allows them to increase
their level of performance (Mishra & Suar, 2010; Doh et al.,
2010; Callan & Thomas, 2009)
There is a top down relation –
Business performance must meet or
exceed the expectations of the
leadership
Firms investment in socially responsible behaviour, In fact, Margolis and Walsh (2003, p. 277)
such as pollution reduction efforts or energy-saving assert that, based on the 127 studies they
technologies, has a measurable effect on its financial review, a positive association is apparent with
performance. very little evidence of a negative association’
CSP
Is a measure of firm i’s socially
responsible performance
i
Theoretical Model of
CSP-CFP
Is a vector of control variables, which X
includes firm i’s financial characteristics,
CFPi = f(CSPi, X, Z)
is a vector of variables that identify Z
the industry in which firm i operates.
CFPit is a measure of firm i’s financial performance CFP
in time period t, i
CSPit-1 is a measure of firm i’s socially responsible
performance in time period t-1,
02 Efficient operation
CSR and
Company 03 Improved financial performance
advantage
Impact of CSR on the competitive
advantage (Ljuboevic et al., 2012).
05 Attract and Retain high-quality employee
01 The quantity and quality of available
business inputs;
CSR and 02
Policies that protect intellectual property,
ensure transparency, safeguard against
corruption, and encourage investment;
Company
03 The size and particularity of the local
competitive demand
advantage
Competitive context
(Porter and Kramer 2006)
04 The support industries and infrastructure
CSR and company’s competitive advantage
01 Consumption Values
03 Consumer loyalty
Consumption values
Emotional values
- emotions can be described as feelings or emotional Social values
reactions against components like “situations, -“The benefit that is perceived and obtained in
products, advertisements and brands” relation to one social group or several social
(Hawkins et al.,1992:19) groups”.
Functional values
-The benefits related to the performance, reliability,
soundness and price of a product are considered for functional
value (Xiao and Kim,2009:612)
Consumer satisfaction and consumer
loyalty
A satisfied consumer will provide Social activities of the company
good references that can encourage create an additional value, hence
other customers to choose this increase the consumer
particular company over any other satisfaction and creates the basis
company for loyalty
(Irshad et al., 2017).
Thank you for listening