of Students at Selected Public Basic Schools in Obuasi Municipality It became clear that the majority of the factors and processes, such as inadequate school facilities, disruptive behavior on the part of students, parents' failure to meet their children's needs, and teachers' poor subject instruction, to name just a few, significantly contributed to poor student performance between 2009 and 2011 (Ghanney and Aniagyei, 2014). The instructor claimed that a dense curriculum has a negative impact on pupils' motivation. Ineffective teaching and learning are the outcome of teachers rushing through the curriculum while unmotivated students. The teacher proposes that the curriculum include about 5 items because of this (Dağgöl, 2013). The teacher element influencing students' low motivation and subpar academic achievement is thought to be those who are unable to generate good energy, inspire student innovation, or motivate students to pursue the learning process (Mauliya, et. al, 2020). Students who are taught by instructors who don't create lesson plans or work schedules, mark their students' books regularly, or establish teaching objectives properly wind up failing their classes (Ngambi, 2014). Students in English lessons with a lot of powerpoint, pictures, or videos typically focus on the screen rather than the instructors' nonverbal cues like their expression or gestures or those of their peers (Li and Zhenmei, 2014). Since the majority of teachers said that their classroom activities were mostly test- centered rather than skill-focused, they are more vigilant to ensure that the students are getting ready for the exam. The teaching and learning activities that are focused on results won't help students use English in real-world situations (Sayeed, 2017). Research Design and Methodology The goal of the study was to look at the academic standing of particular JHSs in Obuasi. The research design used was an exploratory one in accordance with the study's goals and research questions. When conducting exploratory research, one may first be unsure about some important factors, necessitating further investigation. The exploratory nature of the research is to investigate or assess the case of academic performance in light of the research topics. Population In relation to all of the basic schools in Obuasi Municipality, students, parents, and teachers made up the study's target group. However, only kids, parents, and teachers in Obuasi West Circuit were able to use the facility. Three of the 20 basic schools in this circuit were chosen at random for the study. Sample Size From the complete list of students, instructors, and parents, 90 were selected as a sample. A sample of 60 student respondents was chosen from among these participants. Parents and instructors made up the final 30 respondents, bringing the total to 90. This was equally distributed across the three schools, with 30 respondents drawn from each in an effort to eliminate prejudice. Sampling Technique
20 children from each school, as well as a combined total of 15 parents
and 15 teachers from all 3 schools, were chosen using simple random sampling. A straw lottery was utilized as the selecting procedure. In order to avoid gender bias, the student sample was divided into groups of boys and girls using stratified random sampling. Data Collection Instruments A semi-structured interview approach was created to engage respondents in a discussion and provide them the opportunity to express themselves beyond "yes" or "no" responses to closed questions in order to extract data from parents and teachers. The interview guide that the researchers utilized included a list of questions on the particular subjects to be covered. A structured questionnaire was the major data collecting tool used with student respondents to enable the gathering of extra data required to address the study objectives. The style included both open-ended and closed-ended questions to let respondents express their opinions on a wide variety of topics affecting kids' performance. Pilot Testing for Reliability and Validity In order to assess the dependability of the interview data collection instrument in meeting the study's objectives, it was pilot tested on a small number of teachers and parents. The pilot helped weed out unnecessary responses by giving a good sense of the ones that were expected to come from each query. Data Collection Procedure Through interviews and a self-administered questionnaire, primary data were gathered. The vice head of each school helped with the administration of the questionnaires. The deputy head, who set up meetings with teachers and students, was introduced to the researchers by the head of each school they visited. The one and a half hour long interviews were place on the grounds of the chosen JHSs. The interviews were taped on audio. Data Analysis There were both qualitative and quantitative analyses used. A ranking scale was used to analyze the qualitative data gathered and examine the factors that led to subpar academic achievement at the chosen institutions. To ascertain the effect of inputs and processes on output performances, quantitative analysis was used. Result
Eighty-nine percent of respondents said Awurade Basa's results were
terrible; 96% thought Diawuoso had performed poorly; 17% had the same opinion about New Nsuta, with that number climbing to 76% among those who thought the latter's performance had been average to poor. Performance in 2010 BECE
Awurade Basa's results were rated as poor by 11% of respondents, who
later increased that rating to average to poor by 65%; Diawuoso also received poor ratings from a majority of respondents (79%); and New Nsuta received average to poor ratings from 32% of respondents, who later increased that rating to average to poor by 82%. Performance in 2011 BECE
None of the respondents thought that Diawuoso had performed poorly,
and 32% of respondents thought that Awurade Basa's results had been poor, increasing to 100% who classified them as average to poor. Meanwhile, 46% of respondents thought that New Nsuta's results had been poor, increasing to 92% who thought that the latter's performance had been average to poor. Conclusion It became clear that the majority of the factors and processes, such as inadequate school facilities, disruptive behavior on the part of students, parents' failure to meet their children's needs, and teachers' poor subject instruction, to name just a few, significantly contributed to poor student performance between 2009 and 2011. Therefore, if improvements are to be made and the reputation of such schools improved, it is necessary for all stakeholders, including the government, non-governmental organizations, teachers, parents, and students, to play their respective parts in addressing the factors that contribute to poor performance. REFERENCES Main article • Ghanney, Robert Andrews , and Aniagyei, Doris Frempoma. "An Investigation into the Poor Academic Performance of Students at Selected Public Basic Schools in Obuasi Municipality." International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE), vol. 4, no.9, 2014, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234673890.pdf. RRL • Mauliya, Islahul, et al. "Lack of Motivation Factors Creating Poor Academic Performance in the Context of Graduate English Department Students." Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, vol. 6(2), 2020, pp. 73-85, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v6i2.3604. • Dağgöl, Dişlen . "The Reasons of Lack of Motivation from the Students' and Teachers' Voices." The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, vol. 1, 2013, pp. 35-45, https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.13. • Nghambi, Grace Hermas. Factors Contributing to Poor Academic Performance in Certificate of Secondary Education Examination for Community Secondary Schools in Urambo District, Tabora, Tanzania. 2014. Master's dissertation. • MA, Li, and SHI, Zhenmei. "Factors Interfering Students’ Learning Effect in Multimedia-based ESL Classes in China." Journal of Arts and Humanities (JAH), vol. 3, no. 9, 2014. • Anwar, Sayeed. "ESL/EFL Learners’ Poor Performance in English: The Factors." Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities, vol. 3, 2017, pp. 18-26, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326588544_ESLEFL_LEARNERS'_POOR_PERFORMANC E_IN_ENGLISH_THE_FACTORS.