You are on page 1of 34

Et

hA
KU
L

Critically analyze local and


global geopolitical and
socioeconomic factors posing
as trials and opportunities for
Sara Reza
contemporary medical Chemical Pathologist
education MHPE Scholar
The outcomes of a mobile just-in-time-
learning intervention for teaching bioethics
in Pakistan
Azra Naseem, Sameer Nizamuddin and Kulsoom Ghias
BMC Medical Education 2022
Importance of Bioethics in
Healthcare Education
1 Complex Decisions 2 Respect and Dignity
Healthcare professionals Respecting patients'
often navigate complex wishes and maintaining
medical decisions, their dignity is crucial Et
hA
balancing patient care while making sound
KU
L
with ethical ethical decisions.
considerations.
3 Advocacy
Bioethics advocates for the relationship between scientific practice
and societal values, enriching the healthcare profession.
Et
hA
KU
L

Challenges in Bioethics Education


Developing In countries like Inadequate Medical school
Late Adoption

Health Inequities

Interprofessional Training
Inadequate governance
countries have Pakistan, socio- regulatory curricula often
been slow to political and mechanisms and lack
integrate bioethics infrastructural governance interprofessional
education, with weaknesses complicate ethical bioethics training,
many medical exacerbate health decision-making, a gap that needs
colleges lacking inequities, underscoring the addressing with
formal curricula. underlining the urgency of contemporary
need for bioethics bioethics training healthcare
training. challenges.
Mobile Learning in Medical
Education
1 Adoption of m-Learning
Smartphones and tablets support healthcare education,
with positive outcomes reported in medical learning
environments.

2 Benefits of m-Learning Et
hA
KU
L
Efficiency, portability, quick access to resources and
relevance to residency stages influence the adoption of
m-Learning among healthcare residents.

3 Challenges and Considerations


While m-Learning offers many benefits, it is essential to
avoid potential pitfalls such as superficial learning.
Just-In-Time Learning (JiTL)
Approach
Learner Control
JiTL empowers learners with control over the timing and
location of their education.

Collaboration Et
hA
K UL

Mobile technology facilitates timely communication and


collaboration among learners and teachers.

Assessment Tools
Mobile devices serve as efficient tools for conducting
assessments, streamlining the learning process.
Introducing EthAKUL
• Mobile app developed to improve bioethics education for

healthcare professionals in Pakistan.

• Provides easy access to bioethics learning modules and

supports discussions among users.


Et
hA
K UL

• Aimed at evaluating mobile learning's impact on ethical

reasoning.

• Demonstrates the potential of mobile technology to enhance

medical education
Study Methodology
Mixed Methods Participant Diversity
The study utilized a mixed- Participants included
methods triangulation undergraduate and
approach, combining postgraduate medical and
quantitative and qualitative nursing students, residents,
data for a comprehensive and practicing nurses. Et
analysis. hA
KU
L

Intervention
The intervention involved engaging learners with EthAKUL to
explore real-life ethical dilemmas as part of the m-JiTL
approach.
Et
hA
KU
L
Et
hA
KU
L

Study Participation and Demographics


67 29
Participants Completed
Initially, 67 learners joined the intervention. Only 29 completed the post-intervention
questionnaire and knowledge test.

41% 25
Completion Rate Average Age
The study had an overall 41% completion rate. The average age of participants was 25 years.
Eth
AK
UL

Findings: Knowledge improvement


9.34 ±2.37 10.38 ±1.98

Pre-Test Post-Test
The average pre-intervention The average post-intervention
bioethics knowledge test score score, indicating an increase in
knowledge

The study revealed a noticeable change with p-value of 0.012,


indicating a significant increase in knowledge scores.
Et
hA
KU
L

Learners' Attitude Towards m-Learning


Pre-Intervention Post-Intervention No Significant Change
Attitude Attitude
Before the intervention, Post-intervention, the The paired sample T-test
learners had a positive attitude remained revealed no significant
attitude with a mean positive with a mean difference (p=0.231) in
score of 3.32±0.42 score of 3.17±0.44, attitudes before and
towards m-Learning. indicating a stable after the intervention.
perception of m-
Learning.
Et
hA
KU
L

Usage Patterns and Features of EthAKUL


1 Android Access 2 Weekend Usage
A majority of 75.9% accessed Most learners used EthAKUL on
EthAKUL on an Android phone. weekends, with 55.14% logging
in during this time.
3 User-Friendly Design 4 Popular Features
Facilitators found EthAKUL to The "Let's Talk" discussion
be user-friendly and well- forum was the most used
designed for engaging learners feature, followed by "Learn
outside the classroom. More" with organisational
policies.
Et
hA
KU
L
Et
hA
KU
L

• Difficulty in finding recent posts and lack of chronological order


Foru
m in the "Let's Talk" forum posed challenges.
Navig
ation
Challenges

Notifi • The absence of alert notifications for new posts made timely
catio
n responses challenging.
Syste
m

• No option for audio-responses limited participation for those


Lang
uage whose first language was not English.
Barri
er

• Low participation rates, lack of closure in discussions, and


Othe disparities in perceptions of the purpose of the discussion forum.
rs
Facilitation and Learner Engagement
1 Initial Engagement
Learners posted actively during the first month, but
participation declined over time.

2 Facilitation Challenges Et
hA

Facilitators found it challenging to engage learners in


KU
L

discussions and provide closure to ethical dilemmas.

3 Reflection and Interaction


The need for learners to reflect in-action and on-action and
for facilitators to foster critical thinking was emphasized.
Et
hA
KU
L

Reflection
"Considering the technological and
infrastructural challenges in your region, how do
you see mobile learning platforms like EthAKUL
impacting bioethics education?"
Et
hA
KU
L

Recommendations
App Enhancements Curriculum update Blended Learning Approach
Suggestions included making the Updating the curriculum to Integration of m-JiTL with face-to-
forum searchable and adding address learners' needs face teaching suggested
private spaces for reflection

Audio-discussions option Student involvement Further Research


Audio-discussions included to Involving students in co- Recommended to explore
support learners who had difficulty creating learning experiences EthAKUL's integration in various
expressing themselves in writing contexts
Limitations:
• Small participant number due to app limitations and preliminary
testing phase.
• Participants exclusively from a private university in Karachi,
known for bioethics teaching and tech integration.
• Modest response rate and participation with no usage logs to
track continuous app usage.
• Improvement in bioethics knowledge observed but not solely Et
hA
K
attributable to the intervention due to optional participation and
UL

potential external resources.


• No investigation into changes in bioethics practice.
• Findings are not generalizable beyond the study's context,
highlighting the need for further research across different
institutions
Conclusion
•First study in Pakistan to test a custom mobile app and m-JiTL for
bioethics education, showing promising results.
•Generated practical suggestions for mobile app features and m-
JiTL pedagogy in bioethics teaching. Et
hA
K UL

•Emphasizes the need for mobile apps to align with curricular


outcomes and preparedness of faculty and students.
•Advises careful consideration of learning outcomes, pedagogy,
and assessment for successful m-JiTL implementation.
Et
hA
KU
L

Your opinion matters


“How different geopolitical environments might
influence the adoption and effectiveness of
mobile learning solutions in medical education."
Et
hA
K UL
Et
hA
KU
L

Local Trials and Opportunities


• Infrastructure and Resources:
– In regions like Pakistan, limited access to traditional educational resources presents
challenges
– Opens doors for mobile learning solutions, offering a flexible and accessible
alternative
• Cultural and Ethical Awareness:
– The importance of culturally relevant bioethics education is paramount.
– Mobile apps like EthAKUL provide localized content, addressing ethical dilemmas
specific to each locale.
Et
hA
KU
L

Global Geopolitical Factors


• Diverse Ethical Standards:
• Global health emergencies expose the variance in ethical standards across countries,
underscoring the need for educational tools that are both flexible and universally
accessible

• International Collaborations and Policies:


• Geopolitical relations and international policies significantly impact medical
education, influencing curriculum development, accreditation, and the mobility of
healthcare professionals
Et
hA
KU
L

Socioeconomic Factors
• Economic Barriers to Education:
– Socioeconomic disparities globally hinder access to medical education.
– Mobile learning emerges as a cost-effective solution, enhancing accessibility

• Workforce Development:
– A global shortage of healthcare professionals calls for innovative
educational tools to support workforce development, particularly in
underserved regions
Et
hA
KU
L

Technological Opportunities:
• Innovation and Scalability:
– The scalability of mobile learning solutions like EthAKUL to various contexts
highlights the role of technology in overcoming educational barriers.

• Data-Driven Insights:
– Data collected from mobile learning apps can guide the development of
medical education curricula and policies, ensuring education meets
emerging needs
Debate the statement
“Mobile learning in medical education can
bridge the gap created by socioeconomic Et
hA

disparities more effectively than traditional


K UL

education methods."
Et
hA
KU
L

Additional resources
• https://youtu.be/sGQeWRpmglU?si=_LMbu9XxwHZ5TVxo
• Han, H., Hurtubise, L., Plantegenest, G., Vitek, C., Patwari, R. & Foshee, C., 2020. Mobile Learning Literature
Review in Medical Education.
• Seethalakshmi, S., Vedam, V.A., Ghanta, M.K., 2024. An assessment of utility of educational apps in medical
education among undergraduate medical students - A cross-sectional survey. National Journal of Physiology,
Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14(01), pp. 182-187.
• Shrivastava, S.R.B.L. & Shrivastava, P.S., 2022. Mobile and medical education: Points to ponder. Indian
Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU), 15(1), pp. 99-100. Available from:
10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_39_21
• Ravichandran, D., Krishnamoorthy, K., Villanueva, J., Prescod, U., Gottam, V. & Sriya, S., 2022. The Use of
Smartphones in Medical Education: Insights from a Caribbean Medical School. The FASEB Journal, 36(S1).
Available from: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.0r758
Et
hA
KU
L

Additional resources
• Shirazi, Bushra & Riaz, Qamar & Jafarey, Aamir & Ahmed, Rashida & Shamim, Muhammad. (2023). The
Current Status and Challenges of Bioethics Education in Undergraduate Medical Education in Karachi,
Pakistan.. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3315723/v1.
• Spencer SP, Lauden S, Wilson S, Philip A, Kasick R, Mahan JD, Fernandes AK. Meeting the challenge of
teaching bioethics: a successful residency curricula utilizing Team-Based Learning. Ann Med. 2022
Dec;54(1):359-368. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2013523. PMID: 35114873; PMCID: PMC8820793.
• Klitzman RL. Understanding Ethical Challenges in Medical Education Research. Acad Med. 2022 Jan
1;97(1):18-21. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004253. PMID: 34292193.
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldkaPd5uWoQ
Et
hA
KU
L

The Bioethics Innovation Lab


Imagine you are part of a "Bioethics Innovation Lab" tasked with
designing a new module for the EthAKUL app, focusing on a
pressing global bioethical issue.
Et
hA
KU
L

THANKS
Do you have any questions?

sara.qmc@gmail.com
+92-333-4603388
www.linkedin.com/in/sara-
reza-a93092106

You might also like