Academic Year 2023 - 24

S8 PROJECT WORK II
Second Review

PROJECT TITLE
MEDIA RECAP COMPANION

BIP PROJECT ID CATERGORY

24S8EOW436 EXTERNAL – OWN

BATCH MEMBERS GUIDE

SOWMIYA S(202IT224) Prof. NIKITHA M
SARAVANAN T(202IT213) Assistant Professor
BHARANIDHARAN M(202IT119) Department of Information Technology
 PROJECT WORK PLAN

Project Duration: Estimated 3 - 4 months

Phase -1 : Project Initiation (2 Weeks)
1. Project Scope
2. Resource Planning
3. Technology Stack Selection
Phase -2 : Data Collection and Preparation (3-4 weeks)
1. Data – Article Gathering
2. Data Preprocessing
Phase -3 : Model Development (3-4 weeks)
1. Model Architecture
2. Training

27-02-2024 2
 PROJECT WORK PLAN

Phase -4 : Evaluation and Testing (1-2 weeks)

1. Model Evaluation
2. Testing and Validation
Phase -5 : Deployment (1-2 weeks)
1. Deployment Strategy
2. User Interface
Phase 6: Maintenance and Continuous Improvement (Ongoing)
1. Monitoring and Maintenance
2. Feedback Loop

27-02-2024 3
 PROJECT WORK PLAN

Phase 7: Documentation and Knowledge Transfer(Throughout the Project)

1. Documentation
2. Knowledge Transfer
Phase 8: Reporting and Conclusion (Final Month)
1. Final Report
2. Conclusion

27-02-2024 4
 EFFECTIVE UTILIZATION OF THE MODERN TOOL

STREAMLIT:
• User-Friendly Interface
• Interactive Visualizations
• Real-Time Updates
GOOGLE API:
• Advanced Search and Filtering
• Reliability and Scalability
• Comprehensive Coverage

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 5

 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY ( Flow Chart)

27-02-2024 6
 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY ( Gantt Chart)

WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3 WEEK 4 WEEK 5 WEEK 6 WEEK 7 WEEK 8

Learn
Literature
Survey
Content
Study on
Algorithm
Working on
frontend
Working on
Backend
Testing and
Debugging
Update

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 7

 MODULES
TEXT SUMMARIZATION MODULE
• Utilize natural language processing (NLP) techniques and libraries (such as NLTK or
SpaCy) for extracting key information and generating concise text summaries.

CONTENT AGGREGATION AND SCRAPING MODULE

• We design a web scraping or API-based module to fetch content from various media
sources.
• Apply content aggregation techniques to compile diverse information related to users'
preferences.

REAL-TIME UPDATES AND ALERTS MODULE

• We use asynchronous programming for real-time updates and push notifications.
• Integrate with news APIs or feeds to fetch breaking news.

USER INTERFACE (UI) DESIGN MODULE

• We choose a front-end framework in python for building an interactive and user-friendly
interface.
• We implement responsive design for seamless user experience across devices.
27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 8
 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

Advantage:
Efficiency ,Personalization ,Convenience :
• We save users time by providing concise summaries of news articles, allowing them to
quickly grasp the key points without having to read the entire article.
• We can offer personalized news summaries tailored to each user's preferences and
interests, providing a more relevant and engaging news consumption experience.
• Users can access news content anytime and anywhere, making it convenient for people
with busy schedules or limited time to stay informed.

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 9

 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

Disadvantage:
Data Privacy Concerns:
• Loss of context
• Inaccuracy
• Privacy Issues

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 10

 CONCLUSION

• Distill the main points, essential details, and crucial context of a news story while
omitting less significant information.
• Summarization of news serves as a vital tool in managing the information overload
in the digital age.
• Extractive or Abstractive methods in summarization techniques contribute to a
more efficient and accessible way of staying informed about current events.
• This process requires sophisticated natural language processing (NLP) techniques
and machine learning algorithms to understand the content, identify important
elements, and generate coherent summaries.
• Continued advancements in NLP and machine learning will likely further refine and
enhance the capabilities of news summarization systems in the future.

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 11

 INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE WORK
Batch Member 1 : (202IT224-SOWMIYA S )

1. Coordinate the team members.

2. News Article collection related to work.

3. Study the research paper to work on the negative area.

4. Lists the important methods and models in research Paper.

5. To upload the weekly report , surveys and get guidelines from Guide to
maintain the project ongoing.

6. To work on writing the project report paper.

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 12

 INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE WORK
Batch Member 2 : (202IT213 – SARAVANAN T)

1. To write the program according to the list of models selected.

2. Helps in choosing the research papers.

3. To work on writing literature survey according the team work separation.

4. To update the weekly review to the guide and get changes in code and
update in project ideas.

5. To maintain a GitHub repository up to date for research purpose.

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 13

 INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE WORK
Batch Member 3 : (202IT158 –BHARANIDHARAN M)

1. To find out the research paper related to our project.

2. To speed up the model program work by collaborating the process of

programming work.

3. To find out the best competition site , publications site to upload our process.

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 14

 Status on Partial Completion and Submission of Project Report

List of Documents to be Submitted

Status ( Provide the drive link of
SI.No List of Documents
prepared document)
1 Cover Page & Title Page (Both are in same format) Cover-Page

2 Bonafide Certificate Bonafide-Certificate

3 Declaration Declaration

4 Acknowledgement Acknowledgement

5 Chapter I – Introduction Introduction

6 Chapter 2 – Literature Survey Literature-Survey

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 15

 Status on Partial Completion and Submission of Project Report

Status ( Provide the drive link of

SI.No List of Documents
prepared document)
7 Chapters 3 - Objectives and Methodology Objective

8 Chapter 5 - Results and Discussion Chapter-5

9 Chapters 6 - Conclusions & Suggestions for Future -

work
10 References Reference

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 16

 REFERENCES
( Journal Papers/ Books/ Website References )
• J. YaA. Nenkova and K. McKeown, "Automatic summarization", Foundat. Trends Inf. Retrieval, vol. 5, no. 2–3, pp. 103-233, 2011.

• I. Mani and M. T. Maybury, Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, USA, MA, Cambridge:MIT Press, 1999.

• Y. Gong and X. Liu, "Generic text summarization using relevance measureand latent semantic analysis", Proc. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res.

Develop. Inf. Retrieval, pp. 19-25, 2001.

• G. Erkan and D. R. Radev, "LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as saliencein text summarization", J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 22, no. 1,

pp. 457-479, 2004.

• Nallapati R, Zhou B, Santos C, Gulcehre, Xiang B (2016) Abstractive text summarization using sequence-to-sequence RNNs and

beyond. In: Proceedings of the 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp 280–290
• Tianyi Zhang*, Varsha Kishore*, Felix Wu*, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with

BERT.
• Jingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, and Peter Liu. 2020. PEGASUS: Pre-training with extracted gap-sentences for abstractive

summarization. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 11328–11339. PMLR.

• Karen Spä rck Jones. 2007. Automatic summarising: The state of the art. Information Processing & Management, 43(6):1449–1481.

• NewsAPI,”A Web Service for Accessing News Articles Programmatically,” [Online]. Available: https://newsapi.org/.

27-02-2024 SECOND REVIEW PRESENTATION 17