Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part I
FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Intended learning outcomes
Adopting a specific Convention on this subject in the ILO was not easy. It was put off many
times as being too difficult to agree on.
In 1921, the ILO adopted the Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention (No. 11), which
recognised in very general terms that workers in agriculture have the same rights of association as
workers in the industry — but at the time the ILO had not yet defined the freedom of association
rights of industrial workers.
The ILO’s Constitution, which in its original version as Part XIII of the Treaty of Versailles
proclaimed that the High Contracting Parties considered that the right of association “for all
lawful purposes” is of “special and urgent importance”, both for workers and employers
The Declaration of Philadelphia 1944 reaffirmed freedom of association as one of the
fundamental principles on which the Organization was based, and characterised it as “essential to
sustained progress”.
6
Declaration of Philadelphia
Article 2 of Convention No. 87 provides that “Workers and employers, without distinction
whatsoever (or discrimination of any kind as to occupation, sex, colour, race, creed,
nationality or political opinion), shall have the right to establish and ... to join
organizations of their own choosing”.
Only the members of the armed forces and of the police may be excluded
the Convention covers both wage-earners and other workers.
In general the Convention covers:
Public workers
Agricultural workers
Employers
Article 9
There is only one category of exception allowed by Convention No. 87, in Article 9 (1):
“The extent to which the guarantees provided for in this Convention shall apply to the
armed forces and the police shall be determined by national laws or regulations.”
This provision permits either the total exclusion of this category of workers from the
coverage of the Convention or the recognition of some limited rights of freedom of
association.
The Committee on FOA in particular, has made it clear that “this is a matter which has
been left to the discretion of the States Members of the ILO”.
11
Convention 87 – Article 3
“Workers’ and employers’ organizations shall have the right to draw up their constitutions
and rules, to elect their representatives in full freedom, to organize their administration
and activities and to formulate their programmes.” (Article 3.1)
“The public authorities shall refrain from any interference which would restrict this right
or impede the lawful exercise thereof.” (Article 3.2)
Convention 87 – Article 4/5 12
“ Workers shall enjoy adequate protection against acts of anti-union discrimination in respect of
their employment.” (Article 1.1)
Convention 98 – Article 4
“ Measures appropriate to national conditions shall be taken, where necessary, to encourage and
promote the full development and utilisation of machinery for voluntary negotiation between
employers or employers' organisations and workers' organisations, with a view to the
regulation of terms and conditions of employment by means of collective agreements.” (Article 4)
This convention ensures:
Provides protection to workers’ and employers’ organisations rights to join any TU and
discrimination on account of trade union activity
Prevents influence or control by employers or employers’ organisations to financially support the
organisations
Provides for a machinery to ensure respect for the rights recognized within (The IDA was amended
in 1957 with penalty clauses (S.5 -10, S.40(a), (c), (ff), (fff), although by the introduction of unfair
labour practices by amendment to the IDA in 1999)
One Minute Paper
All Members, even if they have not ratified the Conventions in question, have an
obligation, arising from the very fact of membership in the Organisation, to respect,
to promote and to realize, in good faith and in accordance with the Constitution, the
principles concerning the fundamental rights which are the subject of those
Conventions, namely:
(a) freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective
bargaining;
(b) the elimination of all forms of forced or compulsory labour;
(c) the effective abolition of child labour; and
(d) the elimination of discrimination in respect of employment and occupation.”
[Principle 2]
Before 1948
The adoption of international human rights law through a “legislative” process only began
in 1948
The only instruments before 1948 that amount to “human rights” treaties are the Slavery
Convention adopted by the League of Nations in 1926, and the Forced Labour
Convention (No. 29) adopted by the ILO in 1930 to develop the coverage of labour
aspects of slavery
The Development of Freedom of Association
outside the ILO
In 1966, the United Nations codified the principles laid down in the Declaration in two
conventions.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Article 8 (1). The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure:
(a) The right of everyone to form trade unions and join the trade union of his choice, subject only to the
rules of the organisation concerned, for the promotion and protection of his economic and social interests. No
restriction may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those prescribed by law and which are
necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public order or for the protection of
the rights and freedoms of others;
(b) The right of trade unions to establish national federations or confederations and the right of the latter to
form or join international trade union organisations;
(c) The right of trade unions to function freely subject to no limitations other than those prescribed by law and
which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public order or for the
protection of the rights and freedoms of others; Development of freedom of association through ILO
supervision
(d) The right to strike, provided that it is exercised in conformity with the laws of a particular country.
(2). This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on the exercise of these
rights by members of the armed forces or of the police or of the administration of the State.
(3). Nothing in this article shall authorise the States Parties to the International Labour
Organisation Convention of 1948 concerning Freedom of Association and Protection of the
Right to Organise to take legislative measures which would prejudice, or apply the law in
such a manner as to prejudice the guarantees provided for in that Convention
Article 8 ICESCR and C 87
In comparing Article 8 of ICESCR with ILO standards the relative merits of the two approaches can be highlighted:
This provision is not as detailed as Convention No. 87.
Moreover, the restrictions which it authorizes might reduce considerably the extent of the protection which it
affords.
This applies to the limitations which, contrary to Convention No. 87, are permitted as regards the members of the
administration of the State.
This is also the case as regards the limitations “which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of
national security or public order or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others”, for which there is no
equivalent in Convention No. 87.
However, the obligations arising from that Convention are expressly reserved by the saving clause contained in
Article 8, para. 3, of the Covenant.
On the other hand, this Article recognizes the right to strike, but it leaves the conditions of its exercise to the
discretion of national legislations.
2. Regional instruments - Europe
The European Convention on Human Rights (1950) provides for freedom of association
and protection of the right to organize in Article 11.
The European Social Charter (1961) takes an approach much more similar to that of the
ILO standards.
Articles 5 (the right to organize)
Article 6 (the right to bargain collectively).
Article 6 (4) of the Charter contains the first express authorization in an
international instrument of the right to strike
This Article was supplemented by the following provision from the Appendix to the
Charter.
“It is understood that each Contracting Party may, insofar as it is concerned, regulate the
exercise of the right to strike by law, provided that any further restriction that this might
place on the right can be justified under the terms of Article 31.”
Article 31 (1) of the Charter, in turn, provides that: “The rights and principles set forth ...
and their effective exercise ... shall not be subject to any restrictions or limitations not
specified ... except such as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic
society for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others or for the protection of
public interest, national security, public health, or morals”.
Americas
The American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San José, 1969) provides for
freedom of association in its Article 16.
The Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the area of
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Protocol of San José, 1988) develops this right in
Article 8 (which closely resembles the provisions of the ICESCR)
It contains one provision not found in any of the other standards examined here,
affirming that no one may be compelled to belong to a trade union.
This makes trade union security clauses or practices contrary to the Protocol.
Africa
The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (1981) contains no provision directly
on freedom of association for employers or workers.
Article 10, a general assertion for every one of the “right to free association provided that
he abides by the law”
Article 11, the right to freedom of assembly.
International law is thus fairly clear and remarkably consistent on the question of freedom
of association and protection of the right to organize and to bargain collectively.
It is also clear that all these provisions emerge more or less directly from Convention No.
87 and the closely related text of the UDHR
Exercise –One Minute Paper
Describe the protection of labour standards and rights by human rights treaties.
QUIZ
https://www.freiheit.org/sub-saharan-africa/focus/check-your-freedom-quiz
All ratified ILO Conventions are dealt with by the
ILO’s Committee of Experts on the Application
of Conventions and Recommendations.
Governments report at regular intervals, and
the Committee of Experts makes any comments
that may be called for.
ILO Supervisory In more difficult cases, the situation is referred to
Mechanisms the tripartite Conference Committee on the
Application of Standards in the annual session of
How it the International Labour Conference, where the
government concerned may be invited to come
operates and discuss its situation in a public forum, as with
other ILO Conventions.
It is also possible to invoke the constitutional
complaints procedures for freedom of
association Conventions, as for all other
All ratified Conventions.
conventions
Article 24 - Representations of non-observance of Conventions
1. In the event of any representation being made to the International Labour
Office by an industrial association of employers or of workers that any of the
Members has failed to secure in any respect the effective observance
within its jurisdiction of any Convention to which it is a party, the
Governing Body may communicate this representation to the government against
which it is made, and may invite that government to make such statement on the
subject as it may think fit.)
Complaints under article 26 of the Constitution may also be filed, and are examined by a
Commission of Inquiry convened by the Governing Body.
Article 26 - Complaints Procedure
1. 1. Any of the Members shall have the right to file a complaint with the International Labour Office if it is not
satisfied that any other Member is securing the effective observance of any Convention which both have ratified
in accordance with the foregoing articles.
2. 2. The Governing Body may, if it thinks fit, before referring such a complaint to a Commission of Inquiry, as
hereinafter provided for, communicate with the government in question in the manner described in article 24.
3. 3. If the Governing Body does not think it necessary to communicate the complaint to the government in
question, or if, when it has made such communication, no statement in reply has been received within a
reasonable time which the Governing Body considers to be satisfactory, the Governing Body may appoint a
Commission of Inquiry to consider the complaint and to report thereon.
4. 4. The Governing Body may adopt the same procedure either of its own motion or on receipt of a complaint from
a delegate to the Conference.
5. 5. When any matter arising out of article 25 or 26 is being considered by the Governing Body, the government in
question shall, if not already represented thereon, be entitled to send a representative to take part in the
proceedings of the Governing Body while the matter is under consideration. Adequate notice of the date on which
the matter will be considered shall be given to the government in question.
The Governing Body decided in January 1950 to create
the Fact-Finding and Conciliation Commission on
FOA following discussions with ECOSOC.
In November 1951, the Governing Body created a
Special Mechanism special committee from among its own members to
carry out a prior examination of the cases submitted to
that Commission;
In the case of this was the Committee on Freedom of Association.
freedom of The Fact-Finding and Conciliation Commission on FOA
association and the may examine cases only if the government against
right to collective which a complaint was filed agrees to the
examination.
bargaining, the ILO Due to this weakness, The Committee on FOA (which
has made additional required no such agreement) evolved from a body
provisions. whose role was originally conceived as a filtering
mechanism for the Commission into an independent
body which was able to examine complaints.
The Committee is composed of nine titular and
nine substitute members, drawn on a tripartite
basis from the ILO Governing Body;
Committee on Freedom it meets three times a year.
of Association. Complaints may be submitted (1) by governments
(2) by employers’ or (3) by workers’
organizations, alleging that the right of freedom of
association has been infringed.
The distinguishing characteristic of the Commission and of the Committee is that they
may examine complaints whether or not the country concerned has ratified any ILO
Convention on the subject.
Their authority derives directly from the Constitution, and complaints may thus be filed
against any member State of the ILO.
If the government concerned has not ratified the relevant ILO Conventions, the
Committee on FOA itself follows up the effect given to complaints
If the government concerned has ratified, the Committee of Experts on the Application of
Conventions and Recommendations is charged with the follow-up
There are two principal sources for examining the opinions of the ILO supervisory bodies.
The primary source for the Committee of Experts is its own comments on individual
country situations. Each year the Committee of Experts also carries out a General
Survey on one or more ILO Convention(s) and Recommendation(s) reviewing the
situation around the world as regards ratification and difficulties encountered in their
application by governments.
It uses this opportunity to review the meaning and development of the international law
contained in the Conventions concerned
Second, the Committee on Freedom of Association also collects its own decisions, in a
Digest of decisions.
This reviews the questions, principle by principle, and provides detailed guidance on what
has been decided over the years.
The two together provide detailed information on ILO law and practice on freedom of
association and protection of the right to organize
Freedom of association and civil liberties as developed by
the ILO supervisory bodies
This subject is of overarching importance in the field of freedom of association, and bears
a special relationship to the principles laid down in the UDHR
There is a general consensus that respect for civil and political rights is necessary for the
exercise of trade union rights.
In the preparatory report prepared for the adoption of Convention No. 87, the Office
stated that “freedom of industrial association is but one aspect of freedom of
association in general, which must itself form part of the whole range of fundamental
liberties of man, all interdependent and complementary one to another, including
freedom of assembly and of meeting, freedom of speech and opinion, freedom of
expression and of the press, and so forth”
Resolution adopted by the Conference in 1970 stated that civil liberties are essential for
the normal exercise of trade union rights include:
(a) the right to freedom and security of person and freedom from arbitrary arrest and
detention;
(b) freedom of opinion and expression and in particular freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and
regardless of frontiers;
(c) freedom of assembly;
(d) the right to a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal;
(e) the right to protection of the property of trade union organizations.
Aspects of freedom of association developed
through ILO supervision
Article 14. (1) Every citizen is entitled to – (a) the freedom of speech and expression including publication;
(b) the freedom of peaceful assembly;
(c) the freedom of association;
(d) the freedom to form and join a trade union;
(e) the freedom, either by himself or in association with others, and either in public or in private, to manifest his religion
or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching;
(f) the freedom by himself or in association with others to enjoy and promote his own culture and to use his own
language;
(g) the freedom to engage by himself or in association with others in any lawful occupation, profession, trade, business or
enterprise ;
(h) the freedom of movement and of choosing his residence within Sri Lanka ; and
Limitations –Article 15
15. (4) The exercise and operation of the fundamental right declared and recognized by
Article 14(1)(c) shall be subject to such restrictions as may be prescribed by law in the
interests of racial and religious harmony or national economy
NO limitation specified for Article 14 1 (d) the freedom to form and join a trade
union
15 (7) The exercise and operation of all the fundamental rights declared and recognized by Articles 12, 13(1),
13(2) and 14 shall be subject to such restrictions as may be prescribed by law in the interests of national
security, public order and the protection of public health or morality, or for the purpose of securing due
recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others, or of meeting the just requirements of the general
welfare of a democratic society. For the purposes of this paragraph “law” includes regulations made under the
law for the time being relating to public security.
15(8) The exercise and operation of the fundamental rights declared and recognized by Articles 12(1), 13 and 14
shall, in their application to the members of the Armed Forces, Police Force and other Forces charged with the
maintenance of public order, be subject to such restrictions as may be prescribed by law in the interests of the
proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.
Article 17 and 126
17. Every person shall be entitled to apply to the Supreme Court, as provided by Article
126, in respect of the infringement or imminent infringement by executive or action, of a
fundamental right to which such person is entitled under the provisions of this Chapter
126. (1) The Supreme Court shall have sole and exclusive jurisdiction to hear and
determine any question relating to the infringement or imminent infringement by
executive or administrative action of any fundamental right or language right declared and
recognized by Chapter III or Chapter IV.
National Workers Charter 1995
Industrial Disputes Act 1950 as amended (Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, No. 56 of 1999, Industrial
Disputes (Amendment) Act, No. 39 of 2011 – fine has been enhanced)
Trade Union Ordinance 1935 as amended Act No.15 of 1948
32 A. No employer shall-
(a) require a workman to join, or refrain from
joining, any trade union, or to withdraw from, or
IDA to refrain from withdrawing from, his membership
of a trade union of which he is a member, as a
Part V A - Unfair condition of his employment;