Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Theory of
Individual Labor
Supply
Next
page
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
2-2
The Work-Leisure
Decision: Basic Model
Assumptions
Each individual has a fixed amount of
time.
Individuals choose between work and
leisure.
Work is time spent on a paying job.
Leisure includes activities where one
is not paid.
Education
Rest
Work within the household
Optimal decision
To make your optimal decision, you need
2 sets of information:
Subjective information (your work-
leisure preferences) shown on
indifference curves
Objective information (labor market
information) shown on a budget
constraint
0 24 Leisure Hours
24 0 Work Hours
0 L1 L2 24 Leisure
Budget Constraint
• Income/day
The budget constraint shows
the combinations of income
and leisure that a worker
could get given a wage
rate. $360
• The slope of the budget
constraint is – wage rate.
$240
• At a wage rate of $5, a worker
could get a maximum income
of $120 per day ($5/hour * $120
24 ).
• At a wage rate of $10, a
worker could get a maximum
income of $240 per day.
• At a wage rate of $15, a 0 24 Leisure
worker could get a maximum
income of $360 per day.
Jump to first page
2-11
Utility Maximization
• Income/day
The optimal or utility
maximizing point is where the
budget constraint is tangent to
the highest attainable
indifference curve (U on I2).
• At U, the MRS (slope of the
indifference curve) is equal
to the wage rate (slope of the $240
budget constraint) B
• At B, the MRS is greater U
than the wage rate. The $80 I3
individual values I2
leisure more than the A I1
• wage rate.
At A, the MRS is less than
the wage rate. The individual
values leisure less than the 0 16 24 Leisure
wage rate.
w4 I5
I4
I3
w3
u5
u4
I2
w2 u3
I1
w1 u2
u1
Income Effect
Income Effect
The change in desired hours of work
resulting from a change in income,
holding the wage constant.
Assuming leisure is a normal good, so
higher income implies a desire for
more leisure (fewer hours of work).
For a wage increase, income is raised
and so the income effect lowers
desired work hours.
Substitution Effect
Substitution Effect
The change in desired hours of work
resulting from a change in the wage
rate, holding income constant.
A higher wage rate raises the relative
price (opportunity cost) of leisure.
Assuming leisure is a normal good,
then you buy less of it i.e. more hours
of work.
For a wage increase, the substitution
effect raises desired work hours.
Net Effect
For Wage Increases
If substitution effect > income effect,
then hours of work rise.
If income effect > substitution effect,
then hours of work fall.
For Wage Decreases
If substitution effect > income effect,
then hours of work fall.
If income effect > substitution effect,
then hours of work rise.
u5
u4
Y-effect > Substitution
Wage rate
u31
u1
0 Hours of work
24 Jump to first page
2-19
Backward Bending Labor
Supply Rationale
The substitution effect dominates at
low wage rates.
The MRS is low because income is
scarce relative to leisure.
The income effect dominates at higher
wage rates
The MRS is high because leisure is
scarce relative to income.
% Change in
Elasticity quantity of labor supplied
of Labor Supply =
% Change in the wage rate
Es = Δ in quantity ÷ Δ in Wage .
Sum of quantities / 2 Sum of wages / 2
Non-Labor Income
• At a wage rate of $10/hour Income/day
with no other income, the
optimal hours of leisure are 16
(8 hours of work) at point U1.
• If the person gets an
inheritance that generates $300
$60 a day of non- labor income,
the budget constraint has a $240
parallel shift. U2
• The optimal hours of leisure
U1
rise to 17 at point U2 . I2
• With an increase in non-labor I1
income, only the income
effect occurs and so hours of
work must fall. 0 16 17 24 Leisure
H
0 16 18 24
Hours of leisure Hours of work
Budget
u constraint
HNN’ after
N’ N
receiving
the pension
0 H1 H
24
Leisure Work
Jump to first page
2-30
Over-Employment
• Income/day
If an individual is free to
choose the number of hours of
work, she would choose
point U1, with 18 hours of
leisure and 6 hours of work. W
• If the individual is
constrained to work a
standard workday of 8
hours or not at all, she will
U2 U1
• be at point U2.
At U2, her MRS is more than
the wage rate and so she feels
overemployed. N
• What is a potential solution
to her overemployment H
situation? 0 16 18 24 Leisure
• Higher absence rate
• Higher labor turnover rate
• More shirking Jump to first page
2-31
Under-Employment
• If an individual is free to choose
the number of hours of work, she Income/day
would choose point U1, with 10
hours of leisure and 14 hours of
work.
• If the individual is constrained W
to work a standard workday of U1
8 hours or not all, she has to be
at point U2.
• At U2, her MRS is less than
the wage rate and so she U2
feels underemployed.
• What is a potential solution N
to her underemployment
situation?
H
Moonlighting or second job. 0 10 16 24 Leisure
Ij3
Ij2
W
Ij1
uj
Is2 Is3
P
Is1 us
0 H
hj D hs
Leisure Work
Example:
Case of premium pay:
$6/hour for the 1st 8 hours, and
$9/hour for the additional 2 hours
Income/day = ($6 x 8) + ($9 x 2) = $66/day
Case of straight time equivalent pay yielding same
income per day
$6.6/hour for each of the 10 hours = $66/day
W2
Hh1 = 8 hours
u2 of work
u3 Hh2 = 10 hours
W1
of work
I3 Hh3 = 9 hours
u1
I2 of work
I1
0 h2 h3 h1 H
Jump to first page
2-35
u2
W1
ui
u1
I2
S-effect I1
Y-effect
0 h2 h1 h H
i
Jump to first page
2-36
W2
W1
u3
ui
u1 I3
I1
S-effect
Y-effect
0 h3 h1 h H
i
Jump to first page
2-37 Income Maintenance programs
Y-maintenance programs are directed to
the needy.
Wn = (1- 0.5)w
W’ I1 I2
W
$4000 W
I1
Yb
$4000 u3 u3
Yb
u1 u2 u2
$2000 $2000 B (2000) B (2000)
u1
H’
0
Y effect
S effect
H
H’
0 h3 h2 H
h1
Leisure Work
Jump to first page