You are on page 1of 9

ASSESSMENT TOOLS

FOR AFFECTIVE
LEARNING

MODULE
3
B. SEMANTIC
DIFFERENTIAL
 a widely used scale
that employs rating
of concepts with
contrasting adjectives
placed at opposite
ends of the number
scale
C. CHECKLIST
 a form of self-repost that asks
persons to indicate whether they
demonstrate a set of qualities or
behaviors

 a tool for identifying the


presence or absence of a feeling,
attitude or behavior

 behaviors that are checked will


reflect what values and beliefs
learners hold
2. INTERVIEW STRUCTURED AND
 an oral assessment of student UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEW
learning that is conducted
through spoken words and STRUCTURED
casual conversation.  planned sequence of questions
 this assessment allows the  open ended discussions
teacher to collect and explore  done individually or by group
more in-depth information
about the trait being assessed UNSTRUCTURED
that cannot be captured by  informal interview
written instrument nor even be
 appear to be natural and it can
observed.
 not just answerable by "yes" or create a more conversational
"no" environment for sharing
4) Conduct the interview. Start with
2. INTERVIEW the assessment that will make the
For interview to be an affective learner be at comfort level with the
assessment tool, the following are the teacher
general steps in developing and 5) Record the responses, both elicited
conducting an interview:
responses and responses that were
1) Select the assessment objectives.
2) List the oral questions in sequence aided by prompts. Record as well the
based on objectives. However, the questions that were not answered,
sequence is not absolute, instead, and additional questions that were
there would be a room for flexibility. given during the probing process.
Questions should start with general Record the wait time for the
questions followed by more specific response. It will also be worth noting
ones. to be record the nonverbal behavior
3) Make a report sheet or any form to
record responses
like body movements during the
interview process.
In choosing journal writing as an assessment tool
3. STUDENT JOURNALS for effective learning outcome, here are some
guide question to consider:
 affective tools that can be used in
assessing and monitoring student  What is your purpose for the student journal
writing (i.e., critical thinking, reflection, self-
thinking and attitudes awareness, goal review, developing self-
confidence, overcoming anxiety)?
 gives students guided  What is the format (i.e., handwritten free form,
typed, full sentences)?
opportunities to “think aloud”  What is the topic? What do you want the student
trough writing to write (i.e., number of pages, number of
paragraphs or number of words)?
 special form of documentation  How will the students be given feedback (i.e.,
individual, with a small group, with the
that records personal experiences teacher)?
and thoughts.  Who will read the journal (i.e., with teacher
only, with other teacher, with selected students)?
 How will the students be graded (i.e., Pass/Fail,
Rubric, no scoring needed)?
4. OBSERVATION UNSTRUCTURED
 involves looking out for the OBSERVATION
presence or absence of  open-ended with no formal
behavior of learners in a recording or what is observed
natural setting as assessment process is
 allows the teacher to access ongoing
student behavior in the actual
teaching and learning process STRUCTURED
 rich source of dues that can be OBSERVATION
both obtrusive and an obtrusive  you need to prepare checklist
measures of attitude, belief, or rating from before the actual
disposition, character observation
4. OBSERVATION 5) Be clear in ethical uses.
The measures obtained from observation 6) Record the observation immediately.
approach can be made more valid and Use the checklist, supplemented with
reliable with the following guidelines:
anecdotal records that are an Open-
1) Set a clear definition of affective
traits that you want to observe.
ended way to record observation.
2) Prepare a checklist or rating scales Record factual observation and be
that will define the more specific cautions on personal interpretation and
affective behavior you want to biased statements.
capture. 7) Review data. Reflect on outcomes.
3) Consult with a colleague or expert 8) Decide future steps based on the
about the behavior listed is doable observation results.
for observation or not.
9) Adjust planning and apply
4) Have a colleague/colleagues to work
with you in actual observation time.
interventions.
10) Monitor progress.
THANK
YOU!

You might also like