Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MODULE STUDIES
A. PURPOSE
Not all topics in language nor literature can be measured statistically. Viewpoints,
actions and characteristics can’t always be represented numerically and so need a
qualitative approach. In test analysis interviews, usability test and close reading are
very useful tools to identify tests and close reading are very useful tolls to identify the
strengths and weaknesses of a task.
Because of its approach, qualitative research may reveal data that would not
emerge from quantitative analysis. There are various way in which tests can be
analyzed qualitatively.
B. CATEGORIES OF APPROACHES
1. Reflection
This approach is aimed at gaining an insight into the thinking processes and
opinions of the test taker.
1|Page
TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LITERATURE
MODULE STUDIES
2. Verbal reports
Verbal reports or verbal protocols are a way of collecting qualitative data. They
offer and insight into the thought processes of informants.
3. Diary studies
Informant keep a diary which allows researchers to get an insight into their
thoughts. Diaries are not often used in test validation research, but they have
proven their worth in research into their processes.
2|Page
TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LITERATURE
MODULE STUDIES
Peer assessment allows students to collaborate and learn from others. Through
discussion with peers, high school students can verbalize their concerns and ideas in a
way that helps them clarify their thoughts and decide in which direction to proceed.
3|Page
TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LITERATURE
MODULE STUDIES
4|Page
TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LITERATURE
MODULE STUDIES
Task characteristics
This type of validation research helps examine the test tasks and to
determine to which extent they respond to the test goal.
The analysis is performed by a number of expert judges who determine the
task quality.
FEEDBACK METHOD
1. Questionnaires
Questionnaires gather data such as
opinions and views that can also be
gathered through interviews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61aFHm81pas
The question is one of the main decisions to ponder on when designing a questionnaire.
Keep in mind that closed questions are easy to process but the information from them is
limited to the questions that are explicitly asked.
Power of effective questioning
5|Page
TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LITERATURE
MODULE STUDIES
Checklists
a way determining whether all procedures have been gone through, whether
all necessary features are present, ect.
Can literally be a list of boxes to be checked.
Can be used in test design to make sure nothing has been forgotten.
2. Interviews
They are a flexible way of gathering data. There are various kind of interview,
depending on the structure and the number of informants interviewed at the same
time.
(1). Unstructured – there is no fixed interview schedule, but rather a number of
themes that are to be addressed.
(2).Semi structured – the researcher follows a preset schedule it is possible to
deviate from this when interesting issues rises.
(3).Structured – the interviewer goes through a fixed series of written questions
without deviating. This type of interview closely resembles a questionnaire.
6|Page
TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF LITERATURE
MODULE STUDIES
(4).One on one – this kind of interview allows the researcher to zoom in on the
views of individual respondents.
(5).Group – the advantage interviewing larger numbers at once id that
interactions might spark observations that would have gone unnoticed.
REFERENCING
Think about the following before the interview:
a) Interviews should get the chance to practice their interview
skills prior to the collection
b) Ideally, the pilot settings resembles the actual
conditions as accurately as possible
c) During the interview, it’s useful to take note of
the interview situations.
d) The success of an interview largely
depends on the interviewer-respondent
interaction.
e) Interviews are time consuming.
Kinds of referencing:
Norm-referencing is the placement of learners in
rank order, their assessment and ranking in relation to their ability of his/her peers.
Criterion-referencing is reaction against norm-referencing in which the learner is
assessed purely in terms of his/her ability in the subject, irrespective of the ability of
his/her peers.
Criterian and Norm Referencing
The mastery criterion-referencing approach is one in which a single ‘minimum
competence standard’ or ‘cut off point’ is set to divide learners into ‘masters’ and ‘non-
masters’ with no degrees of quality in the achievement of the objective being recognized.
The continuum criterion-referencing approach is an approach in which and
individual ability is referred to a defined continuum of all relevant degrees of ability in the
area of question.
References:
Language and Literature Assessment –A comprehensive Guide /pages 50-57
Authors: Mildred B. Go, Ph.D., Ofelia T. Pocesion, Ph.D.
7|Page