Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEVELEOPEMENT OF
MANDIBLE
AND ITS APPLIED
ASPECT
Dr. Swayam Mohapatra,1st year PGT
Dept. Of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry,
Institute of Dental Sciences
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Age Changes
Conclusion
2
01.
INTRODUCTION
3
MANDIBLE
4
BRANCHIAL ARCH DERIVETIVES
5
02.
PRENATAL
GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT
6
PRENATAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPEMENT
7
PRENATAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPEMENT
Mandibular development involves cells that, originating from the neural crest
and populating the First Pharyngeal Arch.
Osteoblasts
8
The trunk of the Mandibular Nerve By 6th Week I.U.L
medial to and above the dorsal end of the
cartilage
9
Meckel’s cartilage Condensation of the
Intramembranous
extends as a solid mesenchyme occurs in
ossification begins at
cartilagenous rod the angle of incisive and
this condensation first
surrounded by mental branches of
bone of the mandible.
fibrocellular capsule. Inferior alveolar N.
10
Dixon AD, Hoyte DAN, Ronning O. Fundamentals of craniofacial growth. London, England: Routledge; 2017
Backward to a point
Spreads
FROM where mandibular nerve
anteriorly divides into lingual and
to the midline CENTER OF OSSIFICATION
inferior alveolar branches
11
Mental Nerve comes to lie in a shallow groove definite notch on the superior margin of the
bone
By 19 mm Crown-rump Length (CRL) the bone in the region of the mental notch has grown
medially below the incisive nerve and then upward between the nerve and Meckel‘s cartilage
deepening trough of bone is created, composed of lateral and medial plates that are
united beneath the Incisive Nerve
Notch containing the mental nerve is converted into a foramen by a spur of bone that
extends posteriorly over the nerve from the anterior lip of the notch
Further growth of bone over the incisive nerve from the lateral and medial plates begin to
convert the trough into an incisive canal, forming the first segment of the mandibular canal
12
At 40-50 mm CRL, in the 3rd month of fetal life the developing tooth germs lie some
distance superficial to the body of the mandible
Dental organs and papillae of the deciduous tooth germs commence to differentiate bone
of the mandible comes into a closer relationship with them starting development of an
"alveolar element" that eventually will provide sockets for attachment of the teeth
Upward extensions of the medial & lateral plates, above the incisive and inferior alveolar
nerves, one on each side of the tooth germs Lateral And Medial Alveolar Plates
Developing teeth then lie in an open trough or gutter of bone that later is subdivided by inter
dental bony septa into a series of small basins or alveoli
13
During the first few weeks of its development, the mandible shows deposition of new bone
on all surfaces
As the tooth buds increase in size resorption of the inner surface of the alveoli is by
osteoclastic activity. This begins at about 10th week and continues as long as the developing
teeth enlarge
By 10th Week (40 mm CRL stage) The ramal element is first mapped out as a Pre osteoblast
Condensation forming the ramal extension. Coronoid and angular processes are added for
attachment of the muscles of mastication, as the "muscular element"
13th week Resorption begins on the lingual side of the neural element and ramus and on
the buccal surface of the coronoid process.
14
SECONDARY CARTILAGE
Appears between the 10th and 14th weeks post
conception.
Derivatives of secondary cartilage
Part Of
Head Of Mental Region
Coronoid
Condyle
Process
15
Dixon AD, Hoyte DAN, Ronning O. Fundamentals of craniofacial growth. London, England: Routledge; 2017
FORMATION OF THE CONDYLE
• Mesenchymal condensation
5th week – ventral part of mandible
17
Sperber. G.H et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
FORMATION OF CORONOID PROCESS
18
19
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
03.
POSTNATAL GROWTH
AND
THEORIES OF MANDIBULAR
GROWTH 20
01. GENETIC THEORY
• Proposed by ALLAN G BRODIE, 1941
21
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
02. CARTILAGINOUS THEORY
• Proposed by James H Scott , 1950.
• According to Scott - Mandible diaphysis of long bone
• Bent into horse shoe shape with epiphysis removed
• Cartilage constitute half of epiphyseal plate
• Mandible Grow upward and backward direction
22
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
04. UNLOADED NERVE CONCEPT
• Basal tubular portion serves as a protection for the
mandibular canal & it follows a logarithmic spiral in its
downward & forward movement beneath the cranium
24
25
PART COUNTERPART
26
29
The Basal Bone of the Body forms one unit, to which are
attached the Alveolar, Coronoid, Angular, and Condylar
Processes and the Chin. 30
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
RAMUS
Ramus moves posteriorly by remodelling
Bone deposition – posterior side
Bone resorption – anterior side
Remodeling
Hunterian concept associated with
Basic Hunterian pattern of growth ramal uprighting
31
32
CORONOID PROCESS
• Follows Enlow’s V principle.
33
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
CONDYLE
• Growth increases at puberty reaching a peak – 12½ -14
years & Ceases – 20 years
• The condyle grows like an expanding V deposition
on the inner aspect of V and resorption on the outer
surface
• Inferiorly facing end of buccal surface Depository
• Superiorly facing end of lingual surfaces Depository
• The region that was once condyle is gradually
remodeled to a neck condyle relocates to a more
posterior and superior position
34
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
CONDYLAR CARTILAGE
• The condylar cartilage of the mandible uniquely serves as both
1. An articular cartilage in the temporomandibular joint,
2. A growth cartilage analogous to the epiphyseal plate in a long bone,
36
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
ANGLE OF MANDIBLE
LINGUAL BUCCAL
SIDE SIDE
37
38
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
BODY OF MANDIBLE
39
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
MENTAL FORAMEN
Infant Adult
Clinical implications –
• Administration of local anesthetic to the mental nerve
• Infants- the needle –at Right Angle from behind to achieve entry.
• Adults- syringe needle – obliquely to the body of the mandible to enter the
mental foramen
40
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
LINGUAL TUBEROSITY & LINGULA
• Junction of corpus and ramus at the medial aspect
• Equivalent to maxillary tuberosity
• Posteriorly facing surface - Deposition of bone
• Protrudes lingual direction
• Prominence – resorption in lateral and below to it
• Resorption – produced depression – lingual fossa
41
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
ALVEOLAR PROCESS
• Protective trough to the tooth buds
• Adds height and thickness of body
• A ledge extends lingually to ramus – accommodate 3rd molar
42
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
CHIN
• Formed in part of mental ossicle from accessory
cartilage
• Infancy – poorly developed
• Adulthood – significantly developed
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
DEVELOPMENT OF TMJ
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
2nd and 3rd decade:
Characterized by progressive slowing of growth process
By 13-15 years decreased thickness of cartilage layer
Presence of proliferative layer atleast till age of 18 years
Cortical bone cap coalescing with subchondral trabecular bone by 10-12 years of age. This
increases in thickness upto 3rd decade of life
Bone cap is completed by 20 years of age although cartilage and sparse cartilage cells remain.
4th decade:
Cartilage completely replaced by the bone
Articular tissue Relatively unchanged may undergo changes depending on biomechanical loading
45
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
By 5th decade -Mandibular fossa became more deep and
-Articular eminence becomes more prominent
• As age progresses further there is flattening of the articular fossa and decrease in prominence
of the articular eminence
46
Sperber. G.H, et al, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
Questions:
1. 1st ossification center of mandible- Mesenchymal sheath of Meckel’s cartilage near the future
mental foramen
(I) The hormonally regulated growth of the midface and anterior cranial base, which provides a
constantly changing reference input via the occlusion
(II) The rate-limiting effect of this mid facial growth on the growth of the mandible. While growth
of the mandibular condyle and of the sutures may be affected directly and indirectly by systemic
hormones.
3. Newer Theories:
(I) Synthetic Hypothesis: Considered chondrocranium as the key factor for the development of the
cranium and face
(II) Aponeurotic Tension model: Explains the role of muscle plasticity as a vector for craniofacial
growth and the effect of cranial rotation in shaping facial form 47
4. Hunterian Concept of growth:
Linear model for mandibular growth where there is:
-Resorption in the anterior border of ramus
-Deposition in the posterior border of ramus
Thus, lengthening the mandible
48
01.
AGE CHANGES OF
MANDIBLE
49
ALVEOLAR RIDGE
Alveolar ridge height increases in presence of development of teeth
Lower ridge height less retentive dentures , difficulty in placing implants
Shallow vestibule in infants Deeper vestibule in adults Shallow vestibule in old age
Near lower border Midway between upper and lower border Near the upper boarder
Clinical implications –
• Administration of local anesthetic to the mental nerve
• Adults- the needle – Obliquely from behind to achieve entry. 51
• Infants- needle - at Right Angle to the body of the mandible to enter the mental foramen
RAMUS
Obliquely placed ramus promotes rapid Antero-Postero lengthening of mandible
Gradual uprighting happens mandible grows downwards and forward
Thickness is proportional to Posterior cranial fossa & parapharyngeal space
53
CORONOID & CONDYLAR PROCESS
54
MANDIBULAR CANAL
Lies a little Runs nearly parallel to the Runs closer to the upper
above the mylohyoid line alveolar ridge
mylohyoid line 55
56
ANATOMICAL
AT BIRTH ADULT OLD AGE
LANDMARK
Alveolar Ridge Only present as a open shell Alveolar and subdental region of Gets resorbed
body are equal
Mental Foramen Near lower border Midway between upper and lower Near the upper boarder
border
Angle Obtuse (near 180 degrees) Right angle (near 90 degrees) Obtuse (near 140 degrees)
Coronoid & Condylar Coronoid process is larger and is Condylar process is above the Condylar process is above the
Process above the level of condylar level of coronoid process level of coronoid process
process But is bent backwards
Mandibular canal Lies a little above the mylohyoid Runs nearly parallel to the Runs closer to the upper
line mylohyoid line alveolar ridge
Symphysis Menti Present, the bone remains in two Represented by a fain ridge only n Not recognizable or absent
halves united together by fibrous the upper part
tissue
57
02.
GROWTH
MODIFICATION OF
MANDIBLE
58
Growth modification is meant to take the advantage of the body's natural growth to guide
the unfavorable position of lower jaw to a more favorable normal position.
Growth modification is most effective, while the jaw is still developing, which is around the
time of puberty, before growth is complete
59
Growing Mandible
Skeletal
class II
Mandibular
Mandibular
deficient and
deficiency
maxillary excess
Headgear and
Myofunctional
myofunctional
therapy
appliance
60
Skeletal
class III
Mandibular excess
Mandibular
and maxillary
Excess
deficiency
Facemask followed by
Chin cup chin cap / myofunctional
appliance
61
62
66
67
Iyyer. B.S, Orthodontics the art and science. 5th edition. Arya medi publishing house; 2012. p. 9-27.
03.
GROWTH
PREDICTION OF
MANDIBLE
68
NEED FOR GROWTH PREDICTION
• Ability to predict the magnitude and direction of a patient’s facial growth early in life would
enable the clinician to identify those individual who requires interceptive growth modification
and to ensure that the appropriate treatment can be rendered while growth is expected.
• Growth prediction helps the clinician to intercept and correct the malocclusion.
69
04.
DEVELOPMENTAL
DISTURBANCES
OF MANDIBLE
71
POTENTIAL DISTURBANCES OF NORMAL JAW DEVELOPMENT
✘ Failure of the neural crest to form the margins of the neural tube.
✘ Slowed migration of crest cells away the neural tube.
Develops predominantly
✘ Defective mitotic division of neural crest cells. during embryonic period
from 4th – 8th week.
(critical time)
✘ Increased neural crest cell adhesion.
✘ An unusually high rate of neural cell death
✘ A failed epithelial-mesenchymal interaction either the maxilla or mandibular
prominences that prevents bone cell differentiation.
and position
Treatment-Mandibular reconstruction 74
75
MICROGNATHIA
Means Small jaw, Retrusion of jaw can also produce an
image of micrognathia
Syndromes including
• Pierre robin syndrome
• Cat-cry (cri du chat) syndromes,
• Treacher collins syndrome
• Progeria
• Patau syndrome
Dental Considerations
• Nagar syndrome -Lower crowding of teeth
-Airway obstruction
76
Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3rd edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53.
MACROGNATHIA
Dental Considerations
-Generalized spacing
-Macroglossia
77
Shafer, hine, levy. Shafers’s textbook of oral pathology. 7th edition. Elsevier; 2012. p. 3-80.
CONGENITAL HEMIFACIAL HYPERTROPHY
✘ Represents hyperplasia rather than hypertrophy.
✘ Female: Male = 2:1,often affecting on right side.
✘ Asymmetry starts at birth Enlargement is more accentuated at the age of 6 and
continues till the overall growth ceases.
✘ Enlargement of the mandible and teeth on the affected side.
✘ The bone is wider and thicker.
Dental Considerations
-Premature shedding of deciduous teeth
-Roots of the tooth are enlarged
-Permanent teeth on the affected side
are enlarged and develops more rapidly
TREATMENT:
78
No specific treatment, other than cosmetic Surgery Surgery is done after the cessation of growth
Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3 rd edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53
HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA (Goldenhar’s syndrome)
• Rare congenital defect - incomplete development of the ear, nose,soft palate, lip, and
mandible.
• ETIOLOGY - Anomalous development of the 1st and 2nd branchial arch
Dental Considerations
• Cleft lip and palate
• Unilateral tongue hypoplasia
• Hypoplasia of the maxillary and mandibular
arches
• Micrognathia
• Gingival hypertrophy
• Micrognathia
• Delayed tooth development
79
Shafer, hine, levy. Shafers’s textbook of oral pathology. 7th edition. Elsevier; 2012. p. 3-80.
80
MEDIAN MANDIBULAR CYST
✘ It is an extremely rare and controversial lesion
Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3 rd edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53
82
STAFNE BONE CYST
✘ This condition represents a focal concavity of the cortical bone on
the lingual surface the mandible
✘ In most of the cases, Biopsy reveals histologically normal salivary gland,
suggesting developmental defect containing submandibular S.G.
✘ Asymptomatic radiolucency below the mandibular canal between
the molar teeth and angle of the Mandible
✘ Well circumscribed by a sclerotic border
✘ Anterior lingual salivary defects associated with the Sublingual S.G
Here the lingual surface the mandible showing an anterior
cortical defect caused by sublingual gland can be appreciated
✘ CT image showing well defined concavity in lingual surface
PROGNOSIS: Good
83
Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3 rd edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53
84
TORUS MANDIBULARIS
✘ Develops along the lingual aspect of the mandible, just above the
mylohyoid line in the region of premolars
✘ Etiology: Genetic or Environmental.
✘ Bilateral involvement occurs in more than 90% of cases.
✘ May be single/multiple nodules
✘ Asymptomatic unless the overlying mucosa is ulcerated due to
secondary trauma.
✘ Radiograph shows the radiopacity that is superimposed over the
roots of the mandibular teeth
Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3 rd edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53
PARAMEDIAN LIP PITS
TREATMENT - Excision
86
Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3 rd edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53
87
MANDIBULAR CLEFTS
• Extremely rare condition
• 1819, the first case was reported by Couronne. So far fewer than 80 cases have
been described in the world literature so far.
88
Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3 edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53
rd
89
MANDIBULOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS
90
Shafer, hine, levy. Shafers’s textbook of oral pathology. 7th edition. Elsevier; 2012. p. 3-80.
CORONOID HYPERPLASIA
• Rare developmental anomaly resulting in limited mandibular movements
• Male: Female = 5:1
• Often seen in puberty
TYPES
UNILATERAL BILATERAL
UNILATERAL BILATERAL
•Facial asymmetry •Bird-face
•Microgenia •Convex facial profile
•Short posterior facial •Retrognathic mandible
height •Obtuse cervico-mental
•Minimal condylar angle
movements on palpation •Marked decreased
lower face height
UNILATERAL BILATERAL
CAUSES
SURGICAL
INFLAMATION
• Post-op complication of
• Rheumatoid arthritis
TMJ / orthognathic surgery
• Ankylosing spodylitis During birth use of forceps to pull
• Still’s disease the
• Psoriatic arthritis head out
97
All the events taking place during development of mandible play an important role in
determining the final structure of mandible, any deviation of which can give rise to various
abnormalities in the oro facial region.
A thorough knowledge is required by a Pedodontist to:
Understand the aetiology behind such anomaly, and intervene them at the earliest.
Gain idea about growth vectors , which enables to modify them to get a favourable
outcome
Evaluate the age changes of various skeletal landmark
98
REFERNCES
• Dixon AD, Hoyte DAN, Ronning O. Fundamentals of craniofacial growth. London, England: Routledge;
2017
• Sperber. G.H, sperber. S.M, guttmann G.D, tobias P.V, craniofacial embryogenetics and development. 2 nd
edition. Peoples’s medical publishing housing- USA shelton, connecticut;2010. p. 121--186
• Enlow DH. Essentials of facial growth. WB Saunders; 1996.
• Permkumar. S. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd edition. Elsevier; 2015. p. 14-66.
• Agarwal V, Tandon R, Singh K, Chandra P, Agarwal S. Growth prediction methods: A review. IP Ind J of
Ortho and Dentofa Res 2021;7(2):106–13.
• Neville, Damm, Alen, Bouquot. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. 3rd edition. Elsevier; 2009. p. 1-53
• Shafer, hine, levy. Shafers’s textbook of oral pathology. 7th edition. Elsevier; 2012. p. 3-80.
• Iyyer. B.S, Orthodontics the art and science. 5th edition. Arya medi publishing house; 2012. p. 9-27.
99
THANK YOU
100