Professional Documents
Culture Documents
本构关系
本构关系
Microstructure of soil
Strength of soil
Slope stability
Constitutive Law of Soil
Yin Zong-ze
1.About Stress-strain Relationship
(1) What is constitutive law?
Stress-strain relationship
Stress-strain-strength relationship
Stress-strain-time relationship
Stress-strain-temperature relationship
strain
stress
strength
( )
( )
f
( ) t
( ) T
(2) Conventional computation of stress-strain
relationship of soils
+
linear
nonlinear
( )
( ) p
e
C
p C e
c
c
lg
1
lg
0
+
e
p lg
c
c
e
p
a
Compression
index
'
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
'
3
2
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
E E E
E E E
E E E
a
a r
a
E
expand
compress
(3) Stress-strain tests
piston
organic glass
base
cylindrical
cell
rubber
membrane
cap
through water to apply
through piston to apply
Axial stress
1
---- from M
z
z r z
, , ,
1 r
2 r
d
1
d
2
2. Deformation Characteristics of
Soils
(1) Non-linear and non-elastic
metal soil
induced by p
p
v
p
v
p
v
loading
v
p
unloading
e
v
p
v
p
p
Macroscopic compress
Microscopic slip between grains
3 1
3
3 1
a
p = constant
v
3 1
a
p = constant
Shear compression Shear dilation
( )
3 2 1 3
1
+ + p
p average normal stress, or global stress
Shear dilation
Dilation dense sand, overconsolidated clay
Compression loose sand, normal consolidated clay
5 . 0
0 2
2
1
>
< +
>
a
r
r a v
a r
Shear dilative
5 . 0 <
a
r
Shear compressive
(3) Plastic shear strain
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
3
1
+ +
oct
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
3
2
+ +
oct
1
2
3
oct
oct
( ) p
oct
+ +
3 2 1
3
1
Extensive shear stress
Extensive shear strain
If , then
energy of shape deformation
( ) ( ) ( )
oct
q
2
3
2
1
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
+ +
( ) ( ) ( )
oct s
2
1
3
2
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
+ +
3 2
3 1
q
G
q
G
s
oct
oct
3
s
s
q W
3 1
3
( )
3 1
a
'
1
1
1
]
1
'
xy
y
x
xy
t
x
C C C
C C C
C C C
33 32 31
23 22 21
13 12 11
13
C
23
C
reflect shear dilation
31
C
32
C
reflect average normal stress inducing
shear strain
Elastic model = 0 = 0
13
C
23
C
31
C
32
C
Plastic model can reflect these effects
(4) Softening and hardening
(
)
3
1
(
)
3
1
Softening
hardening
direct shear test
triaxial shear test
residue
strength
residue
strength
(5) influence of stress path & stress history
Stress space the space consists of stress component
axes
M
Principal stress space p q plane
A point in stress space represents a stress state at a point in
soil body
p
q
Failure line
q
f
p
N
M
3
Stress path influences the strain state significantly
q
p
q
f
A
C
( )
3 1
a
B
B
C
C C
Un-drained
drained
drained
Stress history
the stress state in history or the stress path in history
Plastic strain is irrecoverable. The historical strain was stored
and accumulated.
( )
3 1
a
A
a
B
a
( ) ( )
( )
3 1
3 1 2
3 1
2 1 3 2
2
Lode angle
3
plane
X
Y
3
tg
1
3
2
Octahedral plane
In stress space
In geometry space
In space
Parameter b
2
1
3 1
3 2
+
b
State b
1 1
0 0 0.5
-1 - 0
1 2
( )
3 1 2
2
1
+
3 2
b=1.0
3 1
a
b=0.5
3 1
a
(7) Influence of consolidation stress
(surrounding stress, confining pressure)
Strength
( )
a
p / lg
3
,
_
a
p
3
0
lg
Large grain is broken into
small grains
100 0.01 0.1 1 10 0.001
d mm
p %
Before test
After test
Gradation curve
Shear dilation
In low confining pressure,
shear dilation
In high confining pressure,
shear compression
A B
B
y
B
x
A
x
A
y
A
B
f
B
y
A
x
B
x
A
y
>
>
'
1
1
1
]
1
'
xy
y
x
xy
t
x
C C C
C C C
C C C
33 32 31
23 22 21
13 12 11
32 12 22
31 21 11
13 12 11
, 0 , 1
0 0 1
, 0 , 1
C C C then
If
C C C
C C C then
If
xy x y
xy x y
xy y x
x
xy y x
+ +
12
C
21
C
11
C
22
C
[ ] C unsymmetric
[ ] [ ]
1
C D [ ] D
unsymmetric
True triaxial test
1 3 1 2
, <<
3
1
3
dilative
2
compressive
3
3
31 13
0
1
2
21
<
0
1
3
31
>
31 21
3
=100kPa,
2
=150kPa
3
=100kPa,
2
=200kPa
3
=200kPa,
2
=300kPa
3
=100kPa,
2
=250kPa
3
=100kPa,
2
=300kPa
0 . 0 1 . 0 2 . 0 3 . 0
- 0 . 4
0 . 0
0 . 4
0 . 8
1 . 2
0 . 0 1 . 0 2 . 0 3 . 0
- 5 . 0
- 4 . 0
- 3 . 0
- 2 . 0
- 1 . 0
0 . 0
2
(%)
1
(%)
3
(%)
1
(%)
increase
2 1
1
( )
1
kPa
-3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00
40.00
80.00
120.00
160.00
1
2
3
( )
2
kPa
200.00
-1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00
0.
50.
100.00
150.00
1
2
3
2
1
3
2
3
kPa
-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6
0.00
40.00
80.00
120.00
( )
1
2
3
4
3
3. Nonlinear elastic model
Extensive Hookes low
E E
3 2 1
1
+
E E
1 3 2
2
+
E E
2 1 3
3
'
1
1
1
]
1
'
3
2
1
1
1
1
3
2
1
E E E
E E E
E E E
{ } [ ]{ } C
[ ]
1
1
1
]
1
E E E
E E E
E E E
1
1
1
C
1
1
1
]
1
1
1
1
1
E
Softness matrix
{ } [ ]{ }
[ ]
( )
( )( )
( )
( )
( )
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
1 2
2 1
0 0 0 0 0
0
1 2
2 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
1 2
2 1
0 0 0
0 0 0 1
1 1
0 0 0
1
1
1
0 0 0
1 1
1
2 1 1
1 E
D
D
Hardness matrix
[ ]
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
+
+
+
G
G
G
G B G B G B
G B G B G B
G B G B G B
D
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
4
3
3
2
3
2
0 0 0
3
2
4
3
3
2
0 0 0
3
2
3
2
4
3
( ) +
1 2
E
G
( ) 2 1 3
E
B
shear modulus
bulk modulus, volumetric modulus
[ ] D
{ }
{ }
Nonlinear elastic model
[ ] { } ( )
{ } ( )
{ } ( )
f
f E
f D
(1) Determination of parameters of Hookes law
s
E
a
t
E
0
3 2
3 2 1
1
+
E E
a
t
a
s
d
d
d
d
E
E
1
1
1
1
tangent modulus
secant modulus
s
r
a
a
r
t
a
r
s
d
d
E E
E E
+
1
3
1
1 1
3
3 2
1 2 3
3
0
Triaxial test
3 1
a
t
E
t
r
a
0
3 2
3 2 1
1
+
d d
E
d d
E
d
d
t
t
t
( )
a
t
d
d
d
d
E
3 1
1
1
a
r
t
t
t
t
d
d
d d
E
d d
E
d
d
+
0
3 2
1 2 3
3
1
+
+
1
2
1
t
t
E
t
t
1
r
a
( ) ( )
( )
E t t
r a
r
t
t
t
a
r
E
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
k E
k
k
k k
E
d
d
E
d
d
d d d d d
E
d d
E
d
d
+
1
1
1 1
1
0 0 0
1
3 1 1
1
1 2 2 2 3
3 2 1
1
1
d
3
d
2
d
Determination of K & G
p
v
t
B
s
B
3
q
s
t
G
s
G
v
s s
p
K B
v
t t
d
dp
K B
s OCT
OCT
s
q
G
3
s
t
d
dq
G
3
2 Hyperbolic model
2
3
1
3
a
2 1
2
3
1
3
a
b
( )
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
u
a
i a
a
t
a
a
a
t
a
a
a
a
b
E
a
b
a
E
b
a
b
a
b a
a
E
b a
b a
3 1 2 1
2 1
2
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2
2 1
3 1
2 1
1 1
1
0
1
1
1
1
,
_
,
_
+
3 1
a
( )
u
3 1
( )
f
3 1
( )
u
3 1
the ultimate deviator stress
asymptote of the curve
( )
f
3 1
deviator stress at failure
( )
sin 1
sin 2 cos 2
3
3 1
+
c
f
( )
( )
u
f
f
R
3 1
3 1
Let
Then
( )
f
f
R
b
3 1
a
i
p
E
log
a
p
3
log
K log
n
( ) ( )
n
a
a
f
t
n
a
a i
p
Kp
c
R
E
p
Kp E
,
_
1
]
1
,
_
3
2
3
3 1
3
sin 2 cos 2
sin 1
1
( )
( )
i f t
f
E S R E S
1
3 1
3 1
a a
i
p
n K
p
E
3
log log log
+
a
p atmospheric pressure
S stress level, reflecting mobilized extent of strength
+
1
2
, 2
r
a
D
1
r
a
D
1
f
i
i
1
r
a
r
D
f
( )
a
r
t
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
i
r a
r
r a
f i
t
f i
a
a a
r
t
a
a
r
f
D
s R E
D
A
A
f
s R E b
a
D
f
D
f
,
_
,
_
0
1
1 1
1 1
1
1
3 1
2
3 1
3 1
3 1
2
Asymptotic value of
a
1
r
a
D
1
f
i
( )
( )
( )
( )
f
i tf i t
a
t
a
i
Denel
let if
let if
A
p
F G
p
F G
3 1
3 1
2
3
3
01 . 0 , 0
49 . 0 , 5 . 0
1
log
log
,
_
,
_
Interpolate between and linearly with stress level S
i
tf
G
F
i
,
_
a
p
3
log
Bulk modulus K
B
v
3 1
a
= constant 3
3
3 1
( )
v v
t
p
B
3 1
3
1
t
B
( )
3 2 1 3
1
+ + p
hyperbola
( )
a v a
3 1
m
a
a b t
p
p K B
,
_
) log(
3
a
p
) log(
a
t
p
B
m
b
K log
E B
E
17
3
49 . 0 0
( ) 2 1 3
E
B
loading
reloading
unloading
ur
E
t
E
) log(
3
a
p
) log(
a
ur
p
E
n
ur
K log
( ) K K
p
p K E
p
n K
p
E
E E
ur
n
a
a ur ur
a
ur
a
ur
t ur
0 . 3 2 . 1
log log log
3
3
,
_
,
_
,
_
>
3 1
a
1
3
2
3
Criterion of unloading
In test sample, decrease of
In real soil mass, complicate
3 1
3 1
3
( )
f
3 1
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
history in S S
history in
S S
max
max
0
3 1 0 3 1
0 0 3 1 3 1
( )
0 3 1
0
S
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
75 . 0 1
/ 1
75 . 0
75 . 0
0 1 1
0 1 1 0 1
0 1 1
0 1 1
4
3
4
3
3 1
3 1
1
f f
E E E E
f f f
unloading f f
loading f f
S f
t ur t
f
1
f
( )
0 1
f
E
( )
0 1
75 . 0 f
ur
E
t
E
Unloading of confining stress
30 3
3 1
3
( )
f
3 1
30
( )
( )
n
a
a
f
f
t
p
Kp
R
E
,
_
1
1
]
1
3
2
3 1
3 1
1
( )
i f t
E S R E 1
imaginary E if
E if
t
t
<
, 0
0 , 0
3
3
Unconfined compression
( )
( )
n
a
a
f
f
t
p
Kp
R
E
,
_
1
1
]
1
30
2
3 1
3 1
1
max in history
3
30
parameters
effective strength parameters , c
K initial tangent modulus when
a
p
3
a
p /
50 2000
Kur initial tangent modulus when
a
p /
a
p
3
1.2 3.0
K
n index, which reflects variation of Ei
with
3
0 1.0
Rf failure ratio 0.5 0.95
a
p
3
3 1
a
less
K
2
3
3 1
a
2
3
3 1
a
1
3
1
3
n smaller
3 1
a
Rf
n greater
F parameter which reflects variation of with
G initial tangent Poissons ratio when
a
p
3
r
a
0.2 0.6
0.0 0.25
0.0 20.0
a
r
D
1
f
i
a
r
D
1
f
i
D
1
a
r
i
r
D
1
f
i
a
p
3
G
D
F
2
3
1
3
1
3
2
3
Discussion
Suitability
Constant confined stress
0
3 2
3 2 1
1
+
d d
E
d d
E
d
d
t
t
t
( )
a
t
d
d
d
d
E
3 1
1
1
v
3 1
a
= constant
3
A
B
4. Elasto-plastic model
p e
+
Failure criterion
f
k
f
k <
f
k
elastic
failure
( )
f ij
k f
( )
ij
f
1 failure criterion
failure function
variables are stress components
Trasca criterion
0
2 2 2 2 2 2
2
3 1 1 3 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 1
3 1
,
_
,
_
,
_
,
_
,
_
,
_
f f f f f f
f
k k k k k k
k
3
Hexagonal column
Saturated soil, undrained
c
c 2
2 1
c k
f
Mises criterion
f
k q
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1
2
1
+ + q
Circular column surface
Extensive Mises criterion
3
Drucker-Prager
( )
f
k p f q ,
Geotecnical material
3
( ) ( ) ( ) [ ]
2
1 3
2
3 2
2
2 1 2
3 2 1 1
2 1
6
1
+ +
+ +
+
J
I
k J I
f
first stress invariant
second deviator stress invariant
q J
3
1
2
p I 3
1
Circular cone surface
3
q
r
p
p
M
3
Cambridge university
Mp q
( )
r
p p M q +
p 3
q
3
2
Mohr-Coulomb criterion
c
sin
2
3 1
+
cos c
cos sin
2 2
tan
3 1 3 1
c
c
+
+
+
3
Mohr-Coulunb
Trasca
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
cot
sin 3
sin 6
, 1
cot
sin 3
sin 6
, 0
cot
sin ) 2 1 ( 3
sin 6
2 1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
0
3 1
3 1
3 1 3 1
2
2
3 1
2
3 1
2
2 2
3 1
2
3 1
2
3 2
2
2 1
3 1 3 2
c p q b
c p q b
c p
b
q
q
b
p
q
b b q
b b q
q
b
+
+
+
+ +
+
+ +
+ +
+
1
cos sin
2 2
3 1 3 1
c +
+
0 b
1 b
0
q
1
q
+ +
I
I
k
I
I
f
3
2 yield criterion
k
simple stress
k <
k
elastic
plastic, yield
complicate stress
( ) k f
ij
<
( ) k f
ij
elastic
plastic, yield
theoretical material, yield = failure
geotechnical material, yield failure
c
f
+ tan
f
f
<
p
v
0
p
v
Concept of yield
3
2
k
1
k
( )
ij
f
yield function, corresponding to
yield surface in stress space
yield surface locus of the points in stress
space which reach yield
3
q
p
, k f > if k changes, k f
yield surface moves
Yield surface
ij
ij
d
f
df
ij
d
n
> 90
* unloading
0 >
ij
ij
d
f
df
< 90
* loading
ij
d
1
* neutral loading
0
ij
ij
d
f
df
90
ij
d
1
limit of elastic
plastic
elastic
2 vectors multiply
q
p
3
q
p
3
2
k
1
k
2
k
1
k
2
k
1
k
( )
( ) ( )
( ) 0 ,
H f
H F f
H F k
ij
ij
H hardening parameter,
a physical variant which courses k change
For a given value of H, yield surface
is defined.
How does k change?
Which factor causes k change?
p
s
p
v
p
p
ij ij
p
qd pd W
d W
. 1
p p p p
d d d
v
3 2 1
. 2 + +
ij
p
v
p
ij
p
ij
p
ij
p
ij
p
s
p
s
d
d de
de de d
3
3
2
. 3
) ( , 0
) ( , 1
j i
j i
ij
p
ij
p
ij
p p
d d d . 4
p
s
p
v
p p
s
p
v
p
W H &
( )
p
s
p
v
f H , . 5
4 flue rule
How the plastic strain develops among the strain components?
How to determine the proportion of the strain components?
p
p
3
p
2
p
1
( )
ij
g
3
q
g
p
s
ij
ij
ij
p
W
p
ij
ij
ij
f
( ) 0
0
,
> +
>
p
ij ij
p
ij ij ij
p
ij ij
p
ij ij ij ij
W
unloading loading in
If on yield surface,
ij
0 >
p
ij ij
( )
p
ij ij
p
ij ij ij
>
( ) 0
p
ij ij ij
ij
ij
p
ij
90
derivation
*All the points which represent the
stress must be on the other side
of the plane perpendicular to
yield surface f must be convex.
ij
p
ij
ij
ij
p
ij
ij
ij
p
ij
if concave ( ) 0 <
p
ij ij ij
90
* is perpendicular to yield surface
f
p
ij
ij
ij
p
ij
if not,
90
f g
f g
0 <
p
ij ij
0 <
ij
0 >
p
ij
softening
2
(5) Elasto-plastic Matrix
Elastic
{ } { } d D d
ep
] [
{ } { } { }
p e
d d d +
{ } { }
e
d D d ] [
{ } { }
P
T
P
T
d
H
F d
f
'
'
{ } { } { }) ]( [
p
d d D d
{ }
'
g
d d
P
Plastic
{ }
{ }
] [D
] [
ep
D
{ }
e
d
{ } d
{ }
p
d
{ } d
{ } { }
p
T T
p
T
d D
f H
F d
f
,
_
'
'
'
] [
{ }
d
g
D
f H
F d
f
T T
P
T
'
,
_
'
'
'
] [
{ }
'
,
_
'
'
'
g
D
f H
F
d D
g
d
T T
P
T
] [
] [
{ } { }
d
g
D
f H
F
D
f g
d
g
d
T T
P
T
p
'
,
_
'
'
'
'
'
] [
] [
{ } { }
d
g
D
f
A
D
f g
D
D d
T
T
,
_
'
'
'
'
] [
] [ ] [
] [
'
'
) ( g H
F A
T
P
'
'
'
'
g
D
f
A
D
f g
D
D D
T
T
ep
] [
] [ ] [
] [ ] [
{ } { } { }) ]( [
p
d d D d
{ } { }
d
g
D
f H
F
D
f g
d
g
d
T T
P
T
p
'
,
_
'
'
'
'
'
] [
] [
{ } { } d D d
ep
] [
(a)
P
W H
{ } { } { }
p
T
p
d dW
{ } { }
p
T
p
p
p
d
W
dW
'
{ }
T
T
p
p
W
'
{ }
'
g
F A
T
'
(b)
P
v
H
{ } ( ) ( )
p
v
F f
{ }
P
v
T
d F d
f
'
'
p
g
d d
P
v
'
p
g
F A
'
(c)
P
s
H
'
q
g
F A
'
'
'
g H
F A
T
P
'
'
g W
F A
T
P
p
{ } ( ) ( )
p
s
F f
{ }
p
s
T
d F d
f
'
q
g
d d
P
s
softness matrix:
{ } { }
P
T
P
T
d
H
F d
f
'
'
'
{ }
'
g
d d
P
{ }
A
d
f
d
T
'
{ } { } { }
d C d
A
f g
d
p
T
p
] [
'
'
A
f g
D C C C
T
p e ep
)
'
'
+ +
1
] [ ] [ ] [ ] [
1
] [ ] [
ep ep
D C
'
'
g H
F A
T
P
(6) Cambridge model
1. State boundary surface
An example of Elasto-plastic model
Drained shear test
Undrained shear test
3 1
3
( )
( )
3 1
3 2 1
3
1
3
1
+ + p
( )
3 1
q
e ~ effective stress p & q are
the same for both drained and
undrained tests.
q=0
q=Mp
Virgin compression curve
failure curve
3
1
, on yield surface
NB, on state boundary surface
N
D
1
qreduce, pconstant, e
constant.
NDvertical line
N D
D 2 N B
NB
D B , only p reduces
BD, unloading curve on ground
Line NB project to q p plane, yield locus;
project to e p plane, unloading curve.
NB, intersection line of vertical column surface BDN and horizontal surface NNBB
State boundary surface is the locus of moving curve NB.
Vertical column surface BDN is called elastic wall. Only elastic deformation in the wall.
Go over the top of the wall plastic deformation.
2. Math expression of state boundary surface
NB line (yield locus) yield function
Assume yield function f(p,q).
Along yielding
locus,
0
dq
q
f
dp
p
f
df
Assumption:
Associated flow rule is adopted
f g
p
f
d d
P
v
dp
dq
d
d
p
s
p
v
p
s
s
q
f
d d
p
s
dp
dq
q
f
p
f
p
f
q p
d
v
Plastic
work:
p
s
Mp s Mp w
s
p
p
s
p
v
p
ij ij
p
q p w +
p
s
p
v
p
s
q p Mp +
p
q
d
d
M
p
s
p
v
+
0 + M
p
q
dp
dq
c p
Mp
q
+ ln
If q=0
0
p p
0
ln p c
0
ln ln p p
Mp
q
+
dp
dq
d
d
p
s
p
v
BD line
p k e e
k
ln
0 0
ln p k e e
k
0 0
ln p e e
a
p k p k e e
a
ln ln ) (
0
k
p k e e
p
a
ln
ln
0
) ln ( p k e e
k
M
p
q
a
) ln (ln
1
0 a
a
p
v
p p
e
k
a
p
v
a
p
k
e
p ln
1
ln
0
+
P
a
=1
p
v
a
k
e
p
Mp
q
+
+
1
ln
A
A
For small q/p, calculated result is different from tested one.
If q=0, yield locus is not normal to axis p.
Assume:
2 2
) ( ) (
p
s
p
v
p
M p w +
Then, modified Cam clay model
)
1
exp( ) 1 (
0
2 2
2
p
v
a
a
k
e
p p p
p M
q
+
+
yielding locus is elliptic curve yielding locus is elliptic curve
Shear compression can be reflected, Shear compression can be reflected,
but shear dilation can not but shear dilation can not
) (
r f
p p M q +
+
0 2
2
2
) 1 ( p p
p M
q
r
p p p +
0
2
2
) (
p
p p M
q
p
r
+
+
p
s
Mp s Mp w
s
p
Instead of
p
v
a
k
e
p
Mp
q
+
+
1
ln
(7) discussions
Directions of strain increment
(proportion relationship among of strain increment components)
For elastic model, the direction of strain increment depends
on {} and is not relation to state.
For plastic model, direction of {
p
}
is only depended on {}, and is not
relation to {}.
Elasto-plastic model,
{ }={
e
}+{
p
}
2. Elasto-plastic softness matrix
elastic:
plastic
[ ]
1
1
1
]
1
1
1
1
1
v v
v v
v v
E
c [ ]
'
'
3
2
1
3
2
1
c
[ ]
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
]
1
'
'
3 3 2 3 1 3
3 2 2 2 1 2
3 1 2 1 1 1
1
f g f g f g
f g f g f g
f g f g f g
A A
f g
c
T
p
p p p p
c c c c
21 12 22 11
p p p p
c c c c
21 12 22 11
True triaxial test:
2
1
>>
3
(b=0.6~1.0),
1
is applied,
3
is
dilative ( ),
2
is compressive (+), and
1
is compressive (+).
in direction of
2
, <0
3
1 >
1
[C]
ep
do not reflect such deformation characteristics well because of the flow rule.