DOES THE MIND MATTER?

BEHAVIOUR AND MIND

• Psychology studies behavior to predict and possibly control it, but opinions vary on the usefulness of
studying the mind. Noam Chomsky links linguistics to psychology, viewing language as a way to
explore the mind. In Chomskyan linguistics, understanding the language-mind relationship is central.
• Current linguistics focuses on how language relates to the human mind, posing challenges when
generalizing findings from animal behavior studies. Questions arise about categorizing humans with
linguistic ability separately from other species in mind studies. The potential for studying other
species to provide insights into language or the mind is debated.
• For years, there has been a debate between proponents of behaviorism and mentalism in linguistics.
Behaviorists believe that behavior results from learning through reinforcement or its absence,
focusing on theories of learning. In contrast, mentalists argue that organisms are structured in a way
that allows them to acquire specific types of knowledge, with these structures being innate,
particularly in humans
• Many linguists once believed in the uniqueness of language and the relevance of behavioristic psychology
to language learning. Language was viewed as a system of stimuli and responses learned through
associations and reinforcement, similar to habits. B. F. Skinner's book "Verbal Behavior" claimed that
principles from animal studies and vocabulary learning could explain language acquisition.
• Linguists and psychologists have been drawn to treating language behavior similarly to other behaviors,
applying similar principles and techniques to rats, pigeons, and humans. This approach challenges the
notion that language behavior is fundamentally distinct, suggesting that language researchers can view it
like any other behavior.
• Noam Chomsky criticized the behaviorist approach to language, arguing that language is unique to humans
and cannot be explained by behaviorist principles. He emphasized that the human mind is specifically
structured for language use due to evolutionary development. Chomsky suggested that the human mind is
inherently programmed to acquire and use languages, which explains both similarities among languages and
how they are learned.
 TAKING IN WHAT WE HEAR
Speech requires attention and perception for effective communication. Despite adverse
conditions, such as distorted speech, humans can still understand it and differentiate language
sounds from non-language sounds. However, in challenging circumstances, identifying specific
languages or understanding sense from nonsense can be difficult. The "cocktail party effect"
illustrates our ability to focus on relevant information amidst multiple stimuli. Human attention is
limited, requiring selective focus on relevant stimuli. Attention acts as a gatekeeper, allowing
certain information in while filtering out irrelevant stimuli. Perception involves processing
sensory experiences, with attention serving as a bottom-up process for initial alertness to speech
sounds. Cognition, a top-down process, involves higher mental functions in making sense of
sensory input. Bottom-up and top-down processes are intertwined, with no clear distinction
between them.
Perceiving speech is challenging due to the variability of speech sounds and the absence of clear
patterns. However, people typically understand speech well, indicating the presence of
specialized gatekeeping systems and early central processes. Learning to perceive speech relies
on experience, as suggested by associationist psychologists like Hartley, Mill, Berkley and Hebb.
They propose that individuals build hierarchical experiences, forming cell assemblies in the brain
to aid perception. Unlike visual perception, speech perception doesn't rely on simple template
matching, as it involves more intricate processes.
Organisms, including humans, possess innate perceptual mechanisms and feature detectors that
predispose them to perceive specific characteristics in their environment, as evidenced by studies
on various animals' visual systems. Gestalt psychologists argue that minds are inherently inclined
to seek out patterns and organize stimuli accordingly. Similarly, contemporary researchers
exploring language acquisition suggest that humans have both innate knowledge of the general
structure of language and acquired knowledge of specific language rules, guiding both
production and perception of speech.
• The passage discusses how listeners automatically adjust to variations in speech, including accents,
and how children normalize what they hear. It highlights that we perceive language holistically and
rapidly, without processing individual sounds separately. While some propose a special language
detection system in humans, the evidence for this is weak. Instead, what seems unique is how the
human mind processes language. It also talks about the "motor theory" of speech perception, which
suggests that understanding language involves simulating how we would say it ourselves. However,
this theory lacks evidence and doesn't account for the abstract nature of language. Another approach,
"analysis-by-synthesis," proposes that we construct internal interpretations of speech, constantly
testing hypotheses about what we hear. While this approach emphasizes the role of the mind in
perception, it also faces challenges in matching external sounds with internal abstractions. Overall, it
acknowledges the importance of top-down processes in language processing.
 MEMORIES ARE MADE OF WHAT?
Memory is crucial in language use, but it's not a simple concept, involving various characteristics and
processes. Traits believed to be entirely genetic should be excluded from memory considerations. Many
linguists and psychologists argue that humans are genetically programmed to acquire specific
languages, implying that basic language traits aren't learned or remembered conventionally. Innate
knowledge acts as a guide for learning and remembering. For instance, as English speakers, we learn
and remember English-specific sounds, words, and structures, but we're inherently aware of their
existence.

There are three types of memory: sensory-information store, short-term memory, and long-term
memory. The sensory-information store retains information briefly, with sounds being remembered
longer than sights. Short-term memory has limited capacity, about seven unrelated items or "chunks." It
requires rehearsing to retain items for longer periods. Long-term memory offers seemingly unlimited
storage for processed and understood information, but how it's stored remains a mystery. Retrieval of
information from long-term memory can be direct or indirect, and sometimes unsuccessful, leading to
partial failures like the "tip of the tongue" phenomenon.
The "tip of the tongue" phenomenon occurs when we can't immediately
recall a name, word, or phrase, but know it's on the verge of being
remembered. We may provide clues about the word, like its syllables or
synonyms, but struggle to recall the word itself. Eventually, through a
process of elimination or association, we retrieve the desired word. This
suggests that words are stored in long-term memory with various
properties filed in different locations, and successful recall often requires
alternative search strategies.
Psychologists historically struggled to grasp human language abilities, focusing
on observable behavior and neglecting internal aspects by treating the mind as a
'black box.' They simplified complex behaviors, conducting controlled
experiments that may not represent real-life language use accurately.
Consequently, lab findings often yield inconclusive or conflicting results, posing
a significant challenge in bridging the gap between lab and real-world language
understanding in psychology.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Oliwia Szałtys