Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4 Physical Therapist As Patient Client Manager (1) (1) - 1
Chapter 4 Physical Therapist As Patient Client Manager (1) (1) - 1
Physical Therapist
1. The Physical Therapist as Patient/Client Manager
2. The Physical Therapist as Consultant
3. The Physical Therapist as Critical Inquirer
4. The Physical Therapist as Educator
5. The Physical Therapist as Administrator
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 1
24
The Physical Therapist
as
Patient/Client Manager
Chapter 4
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 2
24
Difference between manager
and administrator
Management is all about plans and actions, but the
administration is concerned with framing policies and
setting objectives. ... The manager looks after the
management of the organization, whereas administrator
is responsible for the administration of the organization.
Management focuses on managing people and their work
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 3
24
Elements of Patient Client
Manager
The physical therapist integrates the five elements of
patient/client management—examination,evaluation,
diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention—in a manner
designed to optimize outcomes.
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 4
24
PATIENT/CLIENT MANAGEMENT
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 8
24
Physical Therapy Diagnosis
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 14
24
Discharge
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 15
24
Discontinuation
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 16
24
OUTCOMES
PTs ask themselves early in the patient/client management process,
“What outcome is likely, given the diagnosis?”
After listing the likely outcomes for each diagnosis, PTs may
reexamine the actual outcomes to determine whether the predicted
outcomes are reasonable and then modify them as necessary.
At the end of an episode of care, the PT informally reflects on, or
formally analyzes through organizational review processes, the
overall impact of the interventions on the patient’s disorders,
impairments, functional limitations, disabilities, health status, and
satisfaction with care, as well as risk prevention, in terms of each
likely outcome.
The more PTs assume responsibility for practicing without referrals,
the more accountable they will become for the outcomes of the care
they provide.
PTs who provide care as members of interdisciplinary teams face the
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 17
challenge of determining the contribution 24of the physical therapy
component to the outcome of the team effort.
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 18
24
May’s Model of Decision Classification
Familiar Unfamiliar
Standard PT is familiar with the task and
there are well understood
The PT is un familiar with the
task, although there are well
procedures for the management understood procedures for
of individuals with this problem the management of
individuals with this kind of
problem
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 21
24
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 22
24
Art of physical therapy, which is the profession’s
commitment to humane service, has not changed,
but the challenges to the therapeutic relationship in
which it must be achieved have. Some of these
challenges,
The need to address a broader range of cultural
issues
Compliance with an ever-increasing number of
laws, regulations, and ethical principles that
guide physical therapy practice
Third-party interpretation of regulations
governing payment for services
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 23
24
Increased access to information for both the PT and the
patient
Increased accountability and responsibility for care
provided
Less delegation of care to support personnel
Employer productivity and caseload expectations
Professional development of the PT
Quality of evidence supporting PTs’ decisions
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 24
24
Thanks
for your
attention!
A.B(batrasian_67@hotmail.com) 05/01/20 25
24