Command-and-control management styles reinforce bureaucracy, power tripping and an overall culture of paranoia, says sanjay gupta. Lack of open conversation kills companies, he says. Companies are living and breathing paranoia. Command and control are met with hostility by intranetworked knowledge workers and generate distrust in internetworked markets.
Command-and-control management styles reinforce bureaucracy, power tripping and an overall culture of paranoia, says sanjay gupta. Lack of open conversation kills companies, he says. Companies are living and breathing paranoia. Command and control are met with hostility by intranetworked knowledge workers and generate distrust in internetworked markets.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Command-and-control management styles reinforce bureaucracy, power tripping and an overall culture of paranoia, says sanjay gupta. Lack of open conversation kills companies, he says. Companies are living and breathing paranoia. Command and control are met with hostility by intranetworked knowledge workers and generate distrust in internetworked markets.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Mary Joaquin Today, the org chart is hyperlinked, not hierarchical. Respect for hands-on knowledge wins over respect for abstract
• Authority within companies really
does not matter anymore as much as it mattered in the past. • In the past employees have high regards with authority • Employees treated differently now compared in the past Command-and-control management styles both derive from and reinforce bureaucracy, power tripping and an overall culture of
• Command and control states that there should
only be one authority for each department .
• That notion may have probably motivated some
people to take the power or authority from others who posses it . – power tripping
• Because of that some people are paranoid that
others might take away their authorities from them Paranoia kills conversation. That's its point. But lack of open conversation kills companies
• They are living and breathing the culture of
paranoia
• They try to limit the information, details, and etc
that they are sharing with other people
• This may result in unfinished works because of
lack richness in information causes delays and affects work schedules, poor decision making, and etc There are two conversations going on. One inside the company. One with the market.
• Conversations taking place inside the
company
• Conversations between the company’s
customers
• These conversations may be done or may
take place through several options In most cases, neither conversation is going very well. Almost invariably, the cause of failure can be traced to obsolete notions of command and control.
• The reason why it is not going very well in most
cases is evidently because of the very root reason, the principle of command-and-control. • This principle may have given the way for power tripping and culture of paranoia to exist. • hinder active and open communication As policy, these notions are poisonous. As tools, they are broken. Command and control are met with hostility by intranetworked knowledge workers and generate distrust in internetworked markets.
• The notion of command and control if
treated as a policy could be fatal if treated as a tool, people or employees tend to break it.
• Intranetworked workers builds up distrust
or suspicion in internetworked markets These two conversations want to talk to each other. They are speaking the same language. They recognize each