You are on page 1of 3

, 22. 2008.

(, 22.12.2008)
.

.
,
, , .

.

, ,
. , ,
,
. (
),
.
.
, ,
. .
. ,
,
( ).
.
,

. ,
,
,
.
. ,
, ,
.

. -

.

,

.
:
.

;
. ,
.

. ,
,
.
.
,
.
,
() .
. ,

, .
.
.
, , ,
. , , .
,
,
. -
, , ,
.
.
.

, . ,

.
? ,
?
? ,
,
. ,
,
. .

, .
,
2001.
(4)
1 , 22 2008 13:23
MP
:" ".
???
2 , 22 2008 15:11

... !!!
3 , 22 2008 22:42
Taca
"We repudiated entirely customary morals, conventions and traditional wisdom. We were, that is to say, in
the strict sense of the term, immoralists. The consequences of being found out had, of course, to be
considered for what they were worth. But we recognized no moral obligation on us, no inner sanction, to
conform or to obey. Before heaven we claimed to be our own judge in our own case. I have to think this is,
perhaps, rather a Russian characteristic. It is certainly not an English one. It resulted in a general,
widespread, though partly covert, suspicion affecting ourselves, our motives, and our behavior. This
suspicion still persists to a certain extent, and it always will. It has deeply coloured the course of our lives in
relation to the outside world. It is, I now think, a justifiable suspicion. Yet so far as I am concerned, it is too
late to change. I remain, and always will remain, an immoralist."
John Maynard Keynes.
4 , 22 2008 22:51
Aleksandar
Ovo je jos jedan dokaz da ekonomija u SAD nije nauka vec ideologija. Kao i u celom drustvu SAD i u
"ekonomiji" ucesnici su zahvaceni necim sto je vrlo nalik poremecaju granicne licnosti koja zahteva da se
cela realnost posmatra u crno/belo slikama. Tako Stiglic i ostali liberalni "ekonomisti" odaju pocast Kejnzu
da je stimulativnim programom prevazisao veliku depresiju. S druge strane, konzervativni ili "moderni"
ekonomisti veruju da je izvor depresije bio premalena monetarna osnova sto je dovelo do Fridmanovstine
(moderne monetarne politike). Ideolozi (napominjem, ne radi se ovde o nauci) tipa ce da nam pricaju da
tekuce stanje krize u SAD (koje vodi u banrot polovinom 2009.) pokazuje trijumf Kejnzijanstva nad
Fridmanovstinom. Ali u stvari, obe enomske-ideologije su potpuno promasene. Postoje kalkulacije koje
pokazuju da su Ruzvaltove kejnzijanske mere produzile depresiju za citavih 7 godina, a i one koje pokazuju
da Bernenkeova sadasnja primena fridmanovske monetarne politike ne vodi nicemu do kompletnom
finasisko-ekonomskom slomu SAD. Ali ova spoznaja nece spreciti vajne profesore i nobelovce sa obe
ideoloske strane da na crno/beli nacin upiru prste jedni na druge tvrdeci da su teorije onog drugog glupe ili
pogresne. Ali i jedni i drugi su zapravo oboleli. Ponasaju se bas kao i svaki oboleli od sindroma granicne
licnosti

You might also like