You are on page 1of 36

FUNCTIONAL SERVICING & STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Proposed Light Industrial Development 250 Vanguard Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Prepared for: S&R Mechanical. 2035 Lanthier Drive Orleans, Ontario K4A 3V3 Attention: Mr. Serge Robert

1-2884 Chamberland Street Rockland, Ontario K4K 1M6

LRL Associates Ltd.

Tel: (613) 446-7777 or (877) 632-5664 Website: www.LRL.ca Fax: (613) 446-1427

LRL File No.: 130427

December 9, 2013

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 i

Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 1.2 2 3 4 Site Description ......................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Development ............................................................................................. 1

SANITARY SERVICING ..................................................................................................... 3 WATER SERVICING .......................................................................................................... 4 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................... 5 4.1 Design Criteria ........................................................................................................... 5 Water Quality ........................................................................................................ 5 Water Quantity...................................................................................................... 5

4.1.1 4.1.2 4.2 4.3 4.4

Method of Analysis .................................................................................................... 5 Allowable Release Rate ............................................................................................. 5 Proposed Stormwater Quantity Controls ................................................................. 5 Rooftop Controls................................................................................................... 6 Hydrovex ICD and 825mm diameter HDPE Storage pipes.................................... 6

4.4.1 4.4.2 4.5 5.0

Proposed Stormwater Quality Controls ................................................................... 7 CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................. 8

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 ii

Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Plan .................................................................................... 2

Appendices
Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Sanitary Analysis Water Demand Calculations Stormwater Management Calculations Downstream Defender Oil Grit Separator

Drawing List
C.101 C.301 C.401 C.601 C.701, C.702 C.901 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Grading Plan Servicing Plan Storm Water Management Plan Pre and Post Development Drainage Plan Details Plan

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 1 of 8

INTRODUCTION

LRL Associates Ltd. (LRL) has been retained as the Consulting Engineers by S&R Mechanical to prepare a Site Servicing and Stormwater Management Report in support of a proposed light industrial development located at 250 Vanguard Drive, Orleans, Ontario. Refer to Figure 1 for the key plan. This Servicing and Stormwater Management Report will: Calculate the anticipated sanitary contribution from the proposed site. Calculate the anticipated site domestic and fire water demands. Calculate the allowable stormwater release rate. Calculate the anticipated post development stormwater release rates. Demonstrate how the allowable release rate will be met with the use of Stormwater Management Best Practices. Provide recommendations for stormwater management maintenance.

All of the above will be done in accordance with accepted engineering practices criteria from the governing approval agencies.

1.1

Site Description

The subject land is 0.682 ha in area and has an irregular shape with a frontage on Vanguard Drive of 100.6m and an average lot depth of +/-69m. The site is a vacant green-field covered by wild grasses. The property is bound to the north by Vanguard Drive; to the east, west and south by vacant lots. The property is flat and gradually drains toward Vanguard Drive with slopes ranging from 0.01% up to 0.5%.

1.2

Proposed Development

The proposed development will see the construction of a 0.202 ha light industrial building with a warehouse and office units. The building will have a sloped rooftop utilized for stormwater storage. The roof drainage will be controlled by a total of 6 Zurn Control Flo roof drains. The building will be surrounded by a drive aisle, parking spaces and loading areas. The proposed development will be completely serviced from the municipal infrastructure located on Vanguard Drive.

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 2 of 8

Figure 1

Site Location Plan

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 3 of 8

SANITARY SERVICING

The proposed site will be serviced with a 150mm diameter sanitary sewer, which will connect to the 250mm diameter sanitary sewer located along Vanguard Drive and is directed toward 525mm diameter trunk sanitary sewer also located on Vanguard Drive.. The parameters used to calculate the anticipated site sanitary flows are: a light industrial average flow demand of 35000 L/ha/day, a light industrial peaking factor of 7.2 (based on Appendix 4-B of the Ottawa Sewer Guidelines) and an infiltration rate of 0.28 L/s/ha. Based on these parameters and the site area of 0.682 ha, the total anticipated sanitary flow is 2.18 L/s. Refer to Appendix A for the site sanitary sewer design sheet and light industrial peaking factor chart. Our findings suggest that this development can be serviced with the sanitary sewer along Vanguard Drive. The services have been designed and will be constructed to comply with the applicable City of Ottawa criteria and standards.

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 4 of 8

WATER SERVICING

The proposed site will be serviced with a 200mm diameter PVC DR-18 watermain and will be connected to the 300mm diameter watermain located along Vanguard Drive. The building will be sprinklered; therefore a Siamese connection will be located within 10m from the front entrance. The site will have a 200mm diameter isolation valve and valve box at the front property line. A hydrant is proposed to be installed on-the site to ensure all areas of the building are within 90m. A Siamese connection is also provided and is within 45m of a hydrant, as required. There is an existing hydrant located on the south side of Vanguard Drive fronting the site, which is also within 90m of the proposed development. The anticipated domestic demand for this development is 0.7 L/s and the fire flow requirements are 105 L/s. Refer to Appendix B for water domestic demand and fire flow calculations. The City of Ottawa provided boundary conditions for the 300mm diameter watermain along Vanguard Drive for the proposed development in an email on September 03, 2013 based on the demands calculated above. Refer to Appendix B for the boundary conditions email. The boundary conditions for this site are: Max Day Demand + Fire Flow = 125.7m Peak Hourly Demand = 122.7m High Pressure = 130.1m The water supply has been analyzed to ensure that the City of Ottawa design criteria are met. For the maximum daily demand + fire flow rate of 105 L/s (2,398 USgpm), the anticipated pressure on Vanguard Drive is 364 KPa. We have estimated the pressure drop between the connection on Vanguard Drive and the building is at 14 KPa for the maximum daily demand and fire flow to the sprinklers through a 200mm diameter PVC DR-18 pipe. The calculated pressure at the floor slab elevation is 350 KPa.The minimum residual pressure of 140KPa is achieved. Therefore the proposed site is serviced adequately with the 300mm diameter watermain on Vanguard Drive and with the 200mm diameter lateral service. We also recommend that the domestic water connection inside the building be 40mm diameter.

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 5 of 8

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

4.1

Design Criteria

The stormwater management criteria for this development are based on the Gloucester and Cumberland East Urban Community Expansion Area and Bilberry Creek Industrial Park Master Servicing Update by Stantec Consulting Ltd. Updated July 2006, City of Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines including City of Ottawa Stormwater Management Design Guidelines, and Rideau Valley Conservation Authority (RVCA) input. 4.1.1 Water Quality

Enhanced (80% TSS removal) quality control will be provided as required by the RVCA. 4.1.2 Water Quantity

The 5 and 100 year post development flows will be controlled to 50 L/s/ha, as specified by the Gloucester and Cumberland East Urban Community Expansion Area and Bilberry Creek Industrial Park Master Servicing Update. 4.2 Method of Analysis

The Rational Method has been used to calculate the runoff rate from the drainage catchment to quantify the detention storage for all control measures, which is in keeping within the requirements. Refer to Appendix C for all stormwater calculations and storm sewer design sheet. 4.3 Allowable Release Rate

The allowable release rate from the site to the municipal sewer is based on 50 L/s/ha for the 5 year storm event. The site is required to control flows for storm events greater that the 5 year, up to the 100 year. The site area totaling 0.682 ha is permitted to release 34.10 L/s for the 5 year and 100 year storm event. 4.4 Proposed Stormwater Quantity Controls

The proposed stormwater management quantity controls for this development will be accomplished through the use of: rooftop storage, Zurn Control Flo roof drains, a Hydrovex ICD and underground storage pipes. The proposed site storm sewer and stormwater management system can be seen on drawing C.401 & C.601 and detailed calculations, including design sheet, can be found in Appendix C. The majority of the site, 0.524 ha, will be controlled on-site with the use of a Hydrovex ICD. Of this 0.524 ha, 0.128 ha is rooftop area from the single-storey portion of the building. The single storey rooftop drainage will be stored and controlled with roof drains. From these roof drains, the controlled flow will exit through roof leaders onto the site asphalt. From there the roof

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 6 of 8

drainage will flow to a site catchbasin and will be controlled again by the hydrovex ICD along with the rest of the major site area. The two-storey rooftop area, 0.074 ha, will also be controlled by roof drains. However, the roof leaders are directly connected to the storm service, which will connect to the site storm system downstream of the Hydrovex ICD and upstream of the oil grit separator. Finally a portion of the site, 0.085 ha, will flow uncontrolled to the Vangaurd right of way (ROW). 4.4.1 Rooftop Controls

Rooftop drainage will be controlled with the use of 6 Zurn Control Flo roof drains: 3 drains on the single-storey roof and 3 drains on the two-storey roof, as can be seen on Drawing C.401 & C.601. These roof drains are to be fitted with 1 weir each at a rated capacity of 0.15 L/s/cm of head. The single-storey Control Flo roof drains will service the proposed sloped rooftop, 0.128 ha, and will have a peak release rate of 4.91 L/s combined during the 100 year storm event and will provide a maximum anticipated storage of 46.88 m3 at a maximum expected height of 110 mm. Scupper drains are to be provided 150 mm above the rooftop elevation to provide an outlet for greater storm events as well as act as an emergency overflow in case of blockage. Additionally, the rooftop will need to be structurally designed to accommodate the maximum 150mm water level. The two-storey Control Flo roof drains will service the proposed sloped rooftop, 0.074 ha, and will have a peak release rate of 5.26 L/s combined during the 100 year storm event and will provide a maximum anticipated storage of 28.66 m3 at a maximum expected height of 118 mm. Scupper drains are to be provided 150 mm above the rooftop elevation to provide an outlet for greater storm events as well as act as an emergency overflow in case of blockage. Additionally, the rooftop will need to be structurally designed to accommodate the maximum 150mm water level. 4.4.2 Hydrovex ICD and 825mm diameter HDPE Storage pipes

The final component for the stormwater attenuation will be the use of a Hydrovex ICD, specifically the 125VHV-2 model, and will be located in the control manhole, CBMH 4, on site. This Hydrovex ICD will ensure the allowable release rate is met during the 5 year and 100 year storm events. In order to throttle the 5 year and 100 year storm flows, on-site storage is required. The Hydrovex ICD will produce a head of 2.78 m and will require 205 m3 of on-site storage. The majority of this storage will be provided with the use of 4 rows of 825mm diameter HDPe 320kPa pipes. The rest of the storage will be provided through use of the on-site storm pipes and structures as well as some parking lot ponding. The maximum expected HWL during the 100 year event is 2.78m (87.91 masl). Refer to Appendix C for storage calculations. Under the 100 year storm event, the Hydrovex ICD will release a maximum of 17.32 L/s into the Vanguard Drive municipal sewer system. The uncontrolled area, 0.076 ha, of the site will release a peak 100 year flow of 11.51 L/s. The two-storey rooftop drains will provide a maximum flow of 5.26 L/s into the Vanguard Drive municipal sewer system downstream of the Hydrovex ICD. Therefore, the total release rate from the site during the 100 year event is 34.10 L/s, which is meets than the allowable release requirement.

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 7 of 8

4.5

Proposed Stormwater Quality Controls

Enhanced 80% TSS removal will be accomplished through the use of an ADS 1200mm diameter Downstream Defender (DD1200) capable of treating the site to 89.5% TSS removal. The first in the treatment train will be the 300mm sumps in all catchbasins and catchbasin manholes located in the parking lots and drive aisle of the site. The sumps will allow sediment to settle to the bottom of the structures and be cleaned when required. The final component in the stromwater treatment train will be the DD1200, which will be located after the Control Manhole. Through the DD1200, 89.5% of the remaining TSS will be removed according to the manufacturer ADS. Refer to Appendix D for the Downstream Defender analysis and information. This combination of treatment solutions will provide an overall TSS removal of 89.5%, exceeding the RVCA requirements of enhanced 80% TSS removal. During construction, erosion and sediment controls will be provided primarily via a sediment control fence to be erected along the perimeter of the site where runoff has the potential of leaving the site. Inlet sediment control devices are also to be provided in any catchbasins and manholes in and around the site that may be impacted by the site construction. Refer to drawing C.101 for details.

LRL Associates Ltd.

Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report 250 Vanguard Drive City of Ottawa

LRL File: 130427 December 9, 2013 Page 8 of 8

5.0

CONCLUSIONS

In accordance with the report objectives, the analysis of the proposed development can be summarized as follows: Sanitary The anticipated sanitary flow from the proposed development is 2.00 L/s at 35,000 L/ha/d and a light industrial peaking factor of 6.6. Water The anticipated domestic demand for the site is 0.7 L/s at 35,000 L/ha/d and a maximum hourly demand peaking factor of 1.8. The maximum expected fire flow demand is 105 L/s. A municipal fire hydrant is available to service a portion of the proposed development. A proposed private fire hydrant is to be located on-site to service the remaining portion of the site. Stormwater Based on City of Ottawa requirements, the allowable release rate to the municipal sewer network is 34.10 L/s for the 5 year and 100 year storm event. For greater rainfall events, the site is permitted to release at an uncontrolled rate to the fronting street, Vanguard Drive. Stormwater attenuation will be provided through the use of six (6) Zurn Control Flo roof drains, and a Hydrovex ICD located in the Control Manhole. The Zurn Control Flo roof drains are to have one (1) notch each. Scupper drains are to be located 15cm above the rooftop elevation and the rooftop will need to be structurally designed to hold the expected water storage load. Parking lot ponding, pipe storage and the 4 additional rows of 825mm diameter HDPE storage pipes will be used to store a 205 m3 with a HWL of 2.78m (87.91 masl) above the Hydrovex ICD centre (85.13 masl) for the 100 year major system event. Under the 100 year event the controlled release rate through the Hydrovex ICD will be 17.32 L/s, the uncontrolled release is 11.51 L/s, and the roof controlled storm service connected to the system downstream of the Hydrovex ICD will have a maximum flow of 5.26 L/s. This totals 34.10 L/s, which meets the allowable release rate requirement of 34.10 L/s. Enhanced quality protection will be provided through the use of ADS 1200mm Downstream Defender accomplishing 89.5% TSS removal, exceeding the enhanced 80% TSS removal requirement.

Prepared by: LRL Associates Ltd.

Gabrielle Schaeffer, B.Sc.E. Civil Designer

Jean-Claude Lalonde, P.Eng. Project Engineer

LRL Associates Ltd.

APPENDIX A
Sanitary Servicing

LRL Associates Ltd.


Sanitary Design Sheet

LOCATION STREET FROM MH BLDG MH 101 TO MH MH 101 EXIST. AREA (Ha) 0.0 0.0

RESIDENTIAL AREA AND POPULATION CUMMULATIVE PEAK PEAK POP. FLOW AREA FACT. POP. (l/s) (Ha) 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.00

AREA (Ha) 0.0 0.0

COMMERCIAL ACCU. AREA (Ha) 0.0 0.0

AREA (Ha) 0.682 0.000

INDUSTRIAL ACCU. PEAK AREA FACT. (Ha) (MOE) 0.682 0.682 7.2 7.2

INSTITUTIONAL ACCU. AREA AREA (Ha) (Ha) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

C+I+I PEAK FLOW (l/s) 1.99 1.99

INFILTRATION TOTAL ACCU. INFILT. AREA AREA FLOW (Ha) (Ha) (l/s) 0.68 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.19 0.19

TOTAL FLOW LENGTH (l/s) (m) 2.18 2.18 25.8 17.9

PIPE DIA. (mm) 150.0 150.0 SLOPE (%) 1.00% 1.00% CAP. (FULL) (l/s) 15.23 15.23 VEL. (FULL) (m/s) 0.86 0.86

MANHOLE UP DOWN INVERT INVERT (m) (m) 85.35 85.03 85.09 84.85

DESIGN PARAMETERS Average Daily Flow = 350 L/p/day Commercial & Institutional Flow = 50000 L/ha/day Light Industrial Flow = 35000 L/ha/day Heavy Industrial Flow = 55000 L/ha/day Maximum Residential Peak Factor = 4.0 Commercial & Institutional Peak Factor = 1.5 Industrial Peak Factor = as per Appendix 4-B = 7.2 (attached) Extraneous Flow = 0.28 L/s/gross ha Minimum Velocity = 0.60 m/s Manning's n = 0.013

Designed: G. Schaeffer Checked: J.C. Lalonde Dwg. Reference: C.401

PROJECT: S&R Mechanical LOCATION: 250 Vanguard Drive, Ottawa File Ref.: 130427 Date: December 9, 2013 Sheet No. 1 of 1

W:\FILES 2013\130427\3-Reports\Civil\Dec 2013\130427_Dec 2013.xlsx

10/12/2013

Ottawa Sewer Design Guidelines APPENDIX 4-B PEAKING FACTOR FOR INDUSTRIAL AREAS

City of Ottawa

Appendix 4-B.1

November 2004

APPENDIX B
Water Demand Calculations

CALCULATION SHEET

Project:

250 Vanguard Drive Proposed Development Water Demand Calculations

Prepared by: Checked by: Project No: Date:

J. Lenhart J.C. Lalonde 130427 August 20, 2013

Fire Flow Calculation Based on Fire Underwriters Survey 1 F= 220 C ( sqrt (A)) Where F= Fire flow in Lpm C= construction type coefficient = 0.8 for non-combustible construction A = total floor area in sq.m. Building Area= F= 2764.00 sq.m 9,252.98 L/min Round to nearest 1000 l/min 9,000 Ll/min

F= 2

No Fire Hazard Reduction 0% No reduction for non-combustible construction Reduction = 0 L/min F= 9,000 L/min Sprinkler Reduction 30% No sprinklers Reduction = 2700

L/min

Separation Charge 0% North-East Side 0% North-West Side 45m+ 0% South-West Side 45m+ 0% South-East Side 45m+ 0% Total Separation Charge,
Note: Maximum Total Separation Charge is 75%

L/min

F= F= F= Domestic Flow Calculations

9,000 105 L/s 1663 USGPM

2700

6,300.00 L/min

Site Area = Average Day Demand = = = Max. Daily Demand Peaking Factor = Max. Daily Demand = = OR Max. Hourly Demand Peaking Factor = Max. Hourly Demand = = Therefore, Dommestic Flow= 0.7 L/s Fire Flow= 105 L/s

0.68 35000 0.3 4

ha L/(gross)ha/day L/s USGPM

1.5 *As per City of Ottawa standards 0.4 L/s 7 USGPM 1.8 *As per City of Ottawa standards 0.7 L/s 12 GPM = = 12 1663 USGPM USGPM

Julien Lenhart
From: Sent: To: Subject: Sevigny, John <John.Sevigny@ottawa.ca> September-04-13 12:59 PM 'Julien Lenhart' RE: 250 Vanguard Dr. - Master Servicing Study and As-built drawings

Hi Julien, There would be a small change to the Maxday + Fireflow boundary condition however it is not significant enough to affect your design. Therefore, you can proceed with the original BC. Sincerely,

John Sevigny, C.E.T.


Project Manager - Infrastructure Approvals Development Review - Suburban Services Branch - East Unit Planning & Growth Management Dept. Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability 110 Laurier Avenue West 4th floor Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 tel.: (613) 580-2424 ext.14388 fax: (613) 560-6006 e-mail: john.sevigny@ottawa.ca Mail Code: 01-14 From: Julien Lenhart [mailto:jlenhart@lrl.ca] Sent: September 04, 2013 9:21 AM To: Sevigny, John Subject: RE: 250 Vanguard Dr. - Master Servicing Study and As-built drawings

Hi John, My client decided to add sprinklers in the building, this changes the Boundary conditions so I have recalculated the demands accordingly. Fire Flow = 105 L/s Average day = 0.3 L/s Maximum Day = 0.4 L/s Maximum Hour = 0.7 L/s Regards, Julien Lenhart, Civil Engineering Tech.

LRL Associates Ltd.


1-2884 Chamberland Street Rockland, Ontario K4K 1M6 Tel: (613) 446-7777 Cell: (613) 978-4652 Fax: (613) 446-1427 Website: www.LRL.ca

From: Sevigny, John [mailto:John.Sevigny@ottawa.ca] Sent: September-03-13 8:31 AM

To: 'Julien Lenhart' Subject: RE: 250 Vanguard Dr. - Master Servicing Study and As-built drawings

No problem.

John Sevigny, C.E.T.


Project Manager - Infrastructure Approvals Development Review - Suburban Services Branch - East Unit Planning & Growth Management Dept. Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability 110 Laurier Avenue West 4th floor Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 tel.: (613) 580-2424 ext.14388 fax: (613) 560-6006 e-mail: john.sevigny@ottawa.ca Mail Code: 01-14 From: Julien Lenhart [mailto:jlenhart@lrl.ca] Sent: September 03, 2013 8:30 AM To: Sevigny, John Subject: RE: 250 Vanguard Dr. - Master Servicing Study and As-built drawings

Thank you, Julien Lenhart, Civil Engineering Tech.

LRL Associates Ltd.


1-2884 Chamberland Street Rockland, Ontario K4K 1M6 Tel: (613) 446-7777 Cell: (613) 978-4652 Fax: (613) 446-1427 Website: www.LRL.ca

From: Sevigny, John [mailto:John.Sevigny@ottawa.ca] Sent: September-03-13 8:29 AM To: 'Julien Lenhart' Subject: RE: 250 Vanguard Dr. - Master Servicing Study and As-built drawings

Hi Julien, The boundary conditions are as follows: Boundary conditions: PKHR = 122.7m MXDY+Fire = 125.7m Max HGL = 130.1m Sincerely,

John Sevigny, C.E.T.


Project Manager - Infrastructure Approvals Development Review - Suburban Services Branch - East Unit Planning & Growth Management Dept. Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability 110 Laurier Avenue West 4th floor
2

APPENDIX C
Stormwater Management Calculations

LRL Associates Ltd.


Storm Design Sheet

LOCATION STREET 250 Vanguard Drive " " " FROM MH CB 1 CBMH 2 CBMH 3 CBMH 4 bldg stub OGS DESIGN PARAMETERS Q = 2.78CIA where, Q = Peak flow in litres per second (L/s) A = Drainage area in hectares (ha) I = Rainfall intensity (mm/hr) C = Runoff coefficient TO MH CBMH 2 CBMH 3 CBMH 4 OGS OGS TRUNK C = 0.20 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

AREA (Ha)** C = 0.70 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 C = 0.90 0.069 0.132 0.180 0.140 0.074 0.000 Indiv. 2.78AC 0.17 0.33 0.45 0.35 0.19 0.00 Accum. 2.78AC 0.17 0.50 0.96 1.31 0.19 1.49

FLOW Time of Conc. (min.) 10.00 10.89 12.43 13.44 10.00 13.74

Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr) 104.19 99.73 92.90 88.96 104.19 87.85 Designed:

Peak Flow Q (l/s) 18.18 50.34 88.73 17.32 19.29 36.62

Pipe Diameter (mm) 450.00 600.00 825.00 300.00 200.00 300.00 PROJECT:

Type PVC HDPE HDPE PVC PVC PVC

Slope (%) Length (m) 0.20% 0.13% 0.10% 0.34% 1.00% 2.00% 42.1 73.0 51.5 14.6 26.3 14.7

Capacity (L/s) 125.90 223.08 453.92 56.39 32.80 136.76

Velocity (m/s) 0.79 0.79 0.85 0.80 1.04 1.93

Ratio Time of flow (min.) (Q/QFULL) 0.89 1.54 1.01 0.31 0.42 0.13 0.14 0.23 0.20 0.31 0.59 0.27

MANHOLE UP DOWN INVERT INVERT (m) (m) 85.62 85.54 85.39 85.29 85.07 85.02 84.99 84.94 85.35 85.25 85.09 84.95

Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport IDF curve equation (5 year event, intensity in mm/hr) 0.814 I = 998.071 / (Tc + 6.053) Min. velocity = 0.80 m/s Manning's "n" = 0.013

G. Schaeffer Checked: J.C. Lalonde Dwg. Reference: C4.01 File Ref.: 130427 Date: LOCATION:

S&R Mechanical

250 Vanguard Drive, Ottawa Sheet No. Dec 9, 2013 1 of 1

Note: Max Peak Flow through ICD (CBMH 4 to OGS)shown in design sheet. Peak uncontrolled flow from rooftop shown although actually attenuated by Zurn Control Flo roof drains.

W:\FILES 2013\130427\3-Reports\Civil\Dec 2013\130427_Dec 2013.xlsx

10/12/2013

CALCULATION SHEET

Project:

Commercial Development 250 Vanguard Drive 100 Year Stormwater Calculations

Prepared by: Checked by: Project No: Date:

G.Schaeffer J.C. Lalonde 130427 December 9, 2013

Allowable Release Rate Allowable Minor System Release Rate= Allowable Site System Release Rate= Site Parameters 50 L/s/ha 34.10 L/s

Controlled

Total Site Area = Single-Storey Rooftop Area = Hardscape Area = Landscape Area = Total Chamber Controlled =

0.682 0.128 0.391 0.004 0.396 0.074 0.009 0.076 0.085

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

R= R= R= R= R= R= R= R= R=

0.82 0.90 0.90 0.20 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.20 0.27

(3 drains -rooftop controlled then chamber controlled)

(direct, therefore excludes rooftop) (3 drains-rooftop controlled then released to system after ICD)

Semi Controlled Uncontrolled

Two-Storey Rooftop Area = Hardscape Area = Landscape Area = Total Uncontrolled = Runoff Equation Q= C= I= A= 2.78= 2.78CIA (L/s) runoff coefficient rainfall intensity (mm/hr) area (ha) conversion factor

Intensity Equation
0.820 I100 = 1735.688 / (Tc + 6.014) I= Rainfall Intensity (mm/hr) T= Time of concentration (mins)

Stormwater Management Calculations Single Storey Rooftop Storage Chamber/Pipe Storage Two-Storey Rooftop Storage Storage Storage Storage Controlled Controlled Controlled Controlled Uncontrolled Controlled Total Volume Volume Volume Controlled Release Runoff** Release Runoff Runoff*** Release Release 3 3 3 Runoff (L/s) (m ) Rate (L/s) (L/s) (m ) Rate (L/s) (L/s) (L/s) (m ) Rate (L/s) Rate (L/s) 57.27 32.33 3.38 222.48 123.09 17.32 34.10 11.51 32.84 28.66 5.26 38.47 41.02 4.29 151.48 160.98 17.32 7.73 22.06 19.25 3.54 28.59 29.47 44.63 4.67 117.40 180.13 17.32 5.92 16.89 14.75 2.71 25.96 24.10 46.23 4.84 97.04 191.33 17.32 4.84 13.82 12.06 2.22 24.38 20.51 46.83 4.90 83.38 198.15 17.32 4.12 11.76 10.26 1.89 23.33 73.49 202.20 17.32 3.60 10.28 8.97 1.65 22.58 17.93 46.88 4.91 15.97 46.59 4.88 65.97 204.31 17.32 3.21 9.16 7.99 1.47 22.00 14.43 46.11 4.83 2.90 8.27 7.22 1.33 21.55 60.03 204.99 17.32 13.19 45.49 4.76 55.21 204.56 17.32 2.65 7.56 6.60 1.21 21.19 12.16 44.81 4.69 51.20 203.24 17.32 2.44 6.97 6.08 1.12 20.89 11.29 44.08 4.61 47.81 201.18 17.32 2.27 6.47 5.65 1.04 20.63 10.55 43.38 4.53 44.89 198.47 17.32 2.12 6.05 5.28 0.97 20.41 **The controlled rooftop flow is then controlled by the storage pipes/Ipex ICD. **The semi controlled rooftop flow is controlled on the rooftop then bypasses the ICD. Chamber/Pipe Storage Required = Diameter= Hydrovex Flow Regulator (Model 125 VHV-2) Invert= 84.98 masl Springline = 85.13 masl HWL= 2.78 m HWL= 87.91 masl Q= 17.32 L/s Chamber/Pipe Storage Provided = 204.99 m3 206.50 m3

Time (min) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Intensity (mm/hr) 178.56 119.95 91.87 75.15 63.95 55.89 49.79 44.99 41.11 37.90 35.20 32.89

Inlet Control Device

(Refer to Storage Calculation sheets attached)

CALCULATION SHEET

Project:

Commercial Development 250 Vanguard Drive 100 Year Stormwater Calculations

Prepared by: Checked by: Project No: Date:

G.Schaeffer J.C. Lalonde 130427 December 9, 2013

SWM 600mm diameter Pipe Storage Pipe Size (mm) 825 825 825 825 825 825 Indiv. Cumm. Volume (m3) Volume (m3) 27.53 27.53 27.53 55.06 27.53 82.59 27.53 110.12 1.92 112.04 1.92 113.97

Storm Sewer Pipe Storage Pipe Size (mm) 825 600 450 Indiv. Volume (m3) 27.53 20.64 6.70 Cumm. Volume (m3) 27.53 48.17 54.87

Length (m) 51.5 51.5 51.5 51.5 3.6 3.6

% Full 100 100 100 100 100 100

Length (m) 51.5 73 42.1

% Full 100 100 100

MH Storage Indiv. Cumm. Height (m) Volume (m3) Volume (m3) 2.29 0.82 0.82 2.52 4.45 5.28 2.84 7.23 12.50 2.81 7.15 19.66 2.77 7.05 26.70 2.82 7.18 33.88

Manhole CB1 CBMH2 CBMH3 CBMH4 MH5 MH6

Size (m) 0.6 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8

Total Pipe and MH Storage = Surface Ponding = Total Storage =

202.71 3.79 206.50

m3 m3 m3

VHV/SVHV Vortex Flow Regulator

FIGURE 3

APPENDIX D
Downstream Defender Oil Grit Separator

Project Name: City of Ottawa 1200 mm dia. Downstream Defender Sizing Hydro Ref. # 13-8568
Peak Flow=22.59 L/s Pipe dia. = 300mm
Rainfall Intensity1 mm/hr in/hr 0.50 0.02 1.00 0.04 1.50 0.06 2.00 0.08 2.50 0.10 3.00 0.12 3.60 0.14 4.10 0.16 4.60 0.18 5.10 0.20 6.40 0.25 7.60 0.30 8.90 0.35 10.20 0.40 11.40 0.45 12.70 0.50 19.10 0.75 25.40 1.00 38.10 1.50 Flow Rate2 cms 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.011 0.013 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.028 0.038 0.056 cfs 0.026 0.052 0.078 0.105 0.131 0.157 0.188 0.214 0.240 0.267 0.335 0.397 0.465 0.533 0.596 0.664 0.998 1.328 1.992 % Total Rainfall Depth 10.7% 9.3% 10.3% 8.6% 6.7% 5.8% 5.0% 4.4% 2.3% 4.2% 7.4% 4.0% 3.5% 1.8% 3.8% 1.4% 5.2% 2.3% 1.8% DD Removal 3 Efficiency 99.9% 99.7% 99.6% 99.5% 99.3% 99.1% 98.9% 98.8% 98.6% 98.4% 97.9% 97.3% 96.7% 96.1% 95.4% 94.6% 90.2% 84.7% 70.3% Weighted Removal 4 Efficiency 10.7% 9.3% 10.3% 8.6% 6.7% 5.8% 4.9% 4.3% 2.3% 4.1% 7.2% 3.9% 3.4% 1.7% 3.6% 1.3% 4.7% 1.9% 1.3%

Average Annual Volume Treatment Efficiency Adjustment5: Total Net Annual Removal Efficiency: 1. Rainfall data based on 10 years of rainfall data for Canadian Station 6105976, Ottawa CDA, ON 2. Flows approximated using the Rational Method, Q=CIA, where: C= 0.90 A= 0.60 hectares 1.48 acres 3. DD Removal Efficiency based on full-scale test results of 110um particle diameter 4. Weighted Removal Efficiency = (DD Removal Efficiency) x (% Total Rainfall Depth)

95.8% 6.5% 89.5%

5. Adjustment for using 0 minute data for sites wit! t" less t!an 0 min.

Downstream Defender Performance


Test Material = OK110 (D50: Approx.=106 microns) Model: 1.2-m Diameter
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% % Removal 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Flow rate (lps)

Hydro International 94 Hutchins Drive Portland, ME 04102 Tel: (207) 756-6200 Fax: (207) 756-6212 www.Hydro-International.biz

Downstream Defender Performance Evaluation


OK-110 Test Sediment

Prepared by:

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT: The contents of this document, including but not limited to test procedures, performance data, claims, and presentation of results contained herein or annexed hereto, are intended for the use of the recipient to whom the document and all associated information are directed. Hydro International plc owns the copyright of this document (including any reports and data annexed to it), which is supplied in confidence. It must not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied and must not be reproduced, in whole or in part stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing from Hydro International plc. DISCLAIMER: Information and data contained in this document are exclusively for the purpose of assessing the performance of Hydro Internationals Downstream Defender, First Defense, and/or Up-Flo Filter. No warranty is given nor can liability be accepted for use of this information for any other purpose. Hydro International plc has a policy of continuous product development and reserve the right to amend specifications.

Hydro International 94 Hutchins Drive Portland, Maine 04102 t: 207.756.6200 f: 207.756.6212 www.hydro-international.biz
DD OK-110 Performance Evaluation_OP_V1.2

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender

Downstream Defender Performance Evaluation


OK-110 Test Sediment
Summary
Hydro International successfully completed Downstream Defender laboratory testing to assess removal efficiency using OK-110 test sediment. Test procedures were based on protocols used for regulatory approval in the State of Maine. The performance evaluation included varying flow rates and influent concentrations to determine a removal efficiency curve for OK-110 test sand. The Downstream Defender was able to remove greater than 80% for all flow up to 1.5 cfs and maintain greater than 65% removal efficiency up to 2.2 cfs without bypassing any flow. Testing at 1.3 cfs was independently witnessed by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) and testing results were used to receive state-wide certification by the MEDEP.

Figure 1: Downstream Defender Laboratory Testing Test Objectives The Downstream Defender was tested to evaluate TSS efficiency based on OK-110 test sediment for varying flow rates and TSS concentrations. The primary goals of the test program included:
Testing full-scale commercially supplied internals for a 4-ft diameter Downstream Defender. Completing four test runs at flow rates ranging from 0.4 cfs up to 2.2 cfs. Provide independent witnessing during testing to validate and confirm procedures described and followed in this report. Varying inlet concentrations between 200 - 300 mg/L, using OK-110 sand as the test sediment (D50 ~ 106-micron). Obtaining up to five influent/effluent grab samples for each test run. Determining a TSS removal efficiency Performance Curve for OK-110 that can be used for sizing different Downstream Defender models.

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 1 of 8

Technology Description
The Downstream Defender is an advanced Hydrodynamic Vortex Separator that is specifically designed to provide high removal efficiencies of urban runoff pollutants over a wide range of flow rates. It is commonly used in stormwater applications as either pretreatment or as a standalone treatment system, depending on the water quality objectives. The unique flow-modifying internal components distinguish the Downstream Defender from simple swirl-type devices and conventional oil/grit separators by minimizing turbulence and head losses, enhancing separation, and preventing washout of previously stored pollutants. The high removal efficiencies and inherent low head losses of the Downstream Defender allow for a small footprint, making it a compact and economical solution for non-point source pollution.

Figure 2: Downstream Defender - Interior View

As shown above in Figure 2, the Downstream Defender has no moving parts and no external power requirements. It has polypropylene internal components and a stainless steel support frame designed to fit into a cylindrical vessel. The internal components consist of two concentric hollow cylinders (the dip plate and center shaft), an inverted cone (the center cone), a benching skirt and a floatables lid. A tangential inlet pipe is designed for connection to typical subsurface drainage systems. Two ports at ground level provide access for inspection and clean-out of stored floatables and sediment.

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 2 of 8

Test Sediment
The test sediment used for performance evaluation was U.S. Silica grade OK-110 foundry sand. The estimated mean particle size of the OK-110 used for testing is approximately 106-micron. The distribution of the test material is shown in Figure 3. Approximately 20% of the particles are less than 75 m, with the remaining 80% between 75 and 150 m.

100

Percent Finer Than (%)

80
80% 75-150 microns

60 40
20
20% <75 microns

0 0 50 100 150 200 250

Particle Size m

Figure 3: Test sand particle size gradation (OK-110)

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 3 of 8

Performance Test Set-up


As shown in Figure 4, clean water was pumped via an 8-inch variable speed Flygt pump from a 23,000 gallon reservoir, through a pipe network to the inlet of the Downstream Defender. A Hershey VP-820 gearbox butterfly valve was used for accurate flow control, which was measured using an ISCO UniMag Magnetic Flowmeter located in the inlet piping. Where possible, the flows were verified by at least three volumetric, time-to-fill calculations using 200 gallons for greater accuracy. Grab samples were collected at the inlet sampling point and effluent pipe prior to discharging back to the reservoir for recirculation.

Figure 4: Downstream Defender Test Equipment

Dosing equipment, as shown in Figure 5, delivered a slurry of the test sediment at the target influent concentrations. A concentrated water-sand mix was prepared in a 60-gallon slurry tank by adding the required mass of test sediment to up to 55 gallons of clean water. The tank was continually mixed to keep the slurry in suspension. A Watson-Marlow peristaltic pump was used to inject the slurry at a constant rate into the inlet flow of the Downstream Defender in order to obtain the target influent concentrations.

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 4 of 8

Test Procedures
The tested unit has a Peak Treatment Flow Rate (PTFR) of 3 cfs, which is defined as the flow rate that positive removal can be expected without scour. For performance testing, clean water from the reservoir was pumped to the Downstream Defender at flow rates varying from 0.4 cfs to 2.2 cfs. When the test runs flow rate had stabilized, the slurry tank valve was opened and test sediment was pumped into the Influent Slurry Feed Pipe (Figure 6). When test sediment entered the Downstream Defender, the timer was started. After four residence times had passed, the first influent sample was collected. This allowed sedimentation in the unit to stabilize and ensure a representative effluent. Prior to collecting the influent sample, the gate valve was quickly flushed to remove any accumulated sediment.

Slurry Mixer

60-Gallon Slurry Tank

Peristaltic Pump

To Influent Feed Pipe d Pipe

Figure 5: Slurry Mixture Dosing Equipment

The effluent sample was collected one residence time following collection of the influent sample. Four additional influent and effluent sample pairs were collected at one-minute intervals, for up to five influent/effluent sample pairs collected for the test run. Both influent and effluent sample volumes were a minimum of 500 mL.

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 5 of 8

All influent and effluent samples were analyzed for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) by APHA SM2540D. Background influent and effluent samples were collected to ensure clean water supplied from the reservoir did not exceed non-detect concentrations of 4 mg/L for TSS.

Influent Slurry Feed Pipe

T-Pipe Influent Sampling Location

Effluent Sampling Location

Figure 6: Test Unit with Dosing and Sampling Locations

The discrete TSS results from each test runs influent and effluent samples were averaged to determine the test run Event Mean Concentrations (EMC). The EMC was used to determine the removal efficiency for each test run using the equation below.

Efficiency

( InfluentEM C EffluentEM C ) InfluentEM C

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 6 of 8

Removal Efficiency Test Results


Target influent EMCs ranged from 200 mg/L to 300 mg/L. Effluent concentrations varied from about 20 to 150 mg/L, with the highest concentration observed at the highest flow rate of 2.2 cfs. No flows were externally or internally bypassed.

100% 90% 80% 70% % Removal 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 0.5 1 1.5 Flow rate (cfs) 2 2.5

Figure 7: OK-110 Test Material Performance Curve

Removal efficiency results from the four test runs were plotted to determine an equation of bestfit for flow rate and removal efficiency (Figure 7). The equation was used to predict the performance of the Downstream Defender at varying flow rates as shown in Table 1. Extrapolation of the efficiency indicates positive removals can be expected for all flows up to 125% of the models PTFR. Greater than 65% efficiency was observed for all flow rates up to 2.2 cfs and greater than 80% efficiency was observed for all flow rates up to 1.5 cfs.

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 7 of 8

Table 1- OK-110 Test Sediment Removal Efficiency


Peak Treatment Flow Rate (% ) 25 50 75 100 125 Flow (cfs) 0.75 1.5 2.25 3.0 3.75 Removal Efficiency (%) 94 81 63 40 10

Performance Testing Conclusions


Removal efficiency was determined for four test runs with target flow rates of 0.4 cfs to 2.2 cfs with no bypassed flows, and inlet concentrations of 200 to 300 mg/L utilizing OK-110 test sediment with a mean particle size of approximately 106-micron. Up to five influent/effluent sample pairs were collected for each test run, and analyzed for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) in accordance with APHA SM2540D. The Event Mean Concentration (EMC) for each test run was used to determine the Downstream Defenders flow-dependent OK-110 Performance Curve for the range of flows tested. Results from the four test runs showed good correlation between flow rate and removal efficiency. Consistent with flow-based separation systems, the results indicate that efficiency is dependent on flow rate, with higher removal efficiencies achieved at lower flow rates. The results show that 80% TSS removal efficiency can be expected for all flows up to 1.5 cfs, while maintaining greater than 65% removal efficiency at 2.2 cfs, without system bypass of flow. These results demonstrate that the Downstream Defender has considerably high removal efficiencies relative to conventional gravity based sedimentation loading rates, since the removal efficiency remained positive for flows up to 125% of the tested models PTFR. Test procedures were based on protocols used for regulatory approval in the State of Maine. Approximately 25% of the test runs were independently witnessed by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) in order to validate and confirm procedures described and followed in this report. Testing results were used to receive state-wide certification of the Downstream Defender from the MEDEP.

Hydro International Performance Evaluation Downstream Defender Page 8 of 8

You might also like