On THE THIN BLUE LINE I've got a bad case of Constitutional blues

1. Ask any cop and he'll say, he cannot crosses this thin blue line. The phrase has all sorts of lore behind it, [like:
[the blues song] I'm going to the country and paint my mail bo blue' [!"T under the #lections Act, this means 'in
order to mo$e into common la% &urisdiction'. "nder the #lections Act, there are blue 'ones all o$er the place, on a
map, like 1
st
(ations )eser$es, %here cops ha$e to ask the !and *ouncil for permission before crossing that blue
line. [it's a &urisdiction 'issue' +thing]. In la%, ,arliament is under the #lections Act [not the other %ay around] and
1
st
(ations are under the #lections Act, and #* has an entire branch of ho% these 1
st
(ations agree to go$ern
themsel$es under #*, in a land called *anada. In short, it's the #lections Act that binds us into a (ation, and
a. [on this point] ask any learned scholar and they %ill admit that *onstitutionally [by definition] the
-arpster )egime is committing T)#A*-#).: *ollusion %ith the Treasury to sub$ert the *onstitution of
any *ommon%ealth body', by stripping the map of 'blue 'ones', into 'grey 'ones' [under this accelerated
pace of implementing /uasi0legal application of la% [A1A 0 tort la% application that chi''le a%ay our rights]
b. A(2 this pirati'ation of *anada is done thru ',ublic ,ri$ate *ontracts' [and poof] 3 these [blue0'one]
institutions &ust became occupied by the colour of blue A(2 frankly after 45 years of foreign corporations
legally plundering +gutting our good and ser$ices, %ith this instrument called 67T. means %e are all sla$es
c. [on this point] i can /uote learned 7enators, %ho in 7enate )eports, in tiny little paragraphs in 855 page
In/uires and *ommissions state T-AT: if *anadians really kne% %hat 9ulroney did by creating this 67T
that %e %ould re$olt [so that means the 7enate is confirming o$er and o$er [that under tort la%] that for
'national security reasons' 0 it's a state secret] and the perpetuation of this lie dis'torts' la% and order itself.
d. :rankly this ne% -7T did not come into affect until after -arper agreed to enter into this ne% TT,T.
[on this point] I can actually sho% anyone %ith #:) training, in 15 minutes, a huge list of constitution things
that %ere taken a%ay from the Income Ta Act +#lections Act. A(2 frankly had it not been for the fact that
!* $oters $oted out the -7T means that ;<9, still can do my I*=>04)? application. [a big /uirk in la%]
e. @hat i'm trying to point out is that 'if' the -arpster )egime gets a%ay %ith no'body' challenging the
$alidity of 's0>> of the *27A' itself, %ill result in a catastrophic $ictory in the (@A /uest to totally destroy
our ':ree and 2emocratic 7ociety', A(2 i.m mandating the 7** to tell 9r -arper: (A you can't do that.
f. All of my politicking' under I*=>04)? is actually a guarantee to get to the 7** on short lea$e
g. A(2 frankly that's %hy i thanked my arresting officers for gi$ing me such a great case to press
4. [back to pt! on blue"ones# If anyone looked at these ne% sophisticated digital maps, it %ould be
riddled %ith blue 'ones, %here )*9, and *ity ,olice are not %elcome. [like] ,arliament and its
6o$ernment buildings, %here they no% ha$e their o%n contract police called 7pecial AgentsB
1. [$ery important side bar] 2id you kno% that prior to -arper holding Affice T-AT ,arliament and the
7**, had Arder of the 6arter Afficers, defending these InstitutionsC and frankly only the rate of the
rape of our *onstitution po%er grab has changed , %hen %e %ent from (A:TA, to this *ontinuity of
6o$ernment Agreement' that permitted implemented by contract *ity ,olice to do %hat %as eclusi$ely
the domain of 7heriffs [like operate a paddy %aggon or be in a &ailer, or in a court house for eample]
A(2 $oila, contract prisons are already built, ready to implement this ne% round of TT,T po%er0grabs
8. All pro$incial *ourt -ouses (A@ post '!usiness hours' instead of 'Affice hours', A(2 *anada %as
bombarded by all kinds of these changes, since -arper came to po%er. A(2 :)A(1D. IT's !#*A"7#,
1. "nder :reedom of *ontract, he immediately signed this ne% *ontinuity of 6o$ernment Agreement
[455E] %here *anada under *olonial )ule [2icey 2octrine] is occupied by (A:TA [and no% it's TT,T]
and he %as no% obligated to start to dismantle our structure of go$ernment, and make it become like
the "7A, in order for both to become one in some later date. A(2 absolutely e$erything the -arpster
)egime is doing [like] %hen he tried to destroy the 7enate, is because he's contracted to do &ust that,
1. This means, he actually thinks that he's co$ered by the ecuse of 'but i had to 'implement these
measures' under international obligations [7ec 1>**] !"T in this case, the 7** said (A.
4. @ith this case la% in hand this body called ;99, is actually empo%ered under 7ec 88= ** and
due to the uni/ue nature of our 7hort Dea$e 9otion means, i get to the 7** sooner rather than
later. Anyone %ho has follo%ed this case %ill kno% that it %as ine$itable that i %ould get there.
F. $%ankl& all of t'is (uasilegal c%ap is done unde% 't'e colou% of blue' A(2 it's upheld by the *olour of
Affice [defined as [2*D] Gby the people, for the #*A*A9., under the threat of military or economic force
a. [1EE8] This ne% definition happened to be the year %e entered (A:TA and the !A) abandoned
their oath of Allegiance [of 1>>E or is it 1>H4] to ser$ing the (@A's best interests, A(2 for the past 45
years *anadian, Americans, and 9eicans are $ictims of run0a%ay tort la% applications, under (A:TA.
>. [so let's get back to 'blue "ones' )N* +& specific application of 'blue la,'- I ha$e a !*7*
restraining order [since 4511] on a totally different file I under a ne% A6 of !* that says that no
employees under the A6 [like0 police] can cross this blue line called: marc boyer's blue0rights.
1. This occurred 'under tort rulings' that redressed my file that the old A6 had on me. And these ne%
restraining orders %ere clearly $iolated, at this *ar :ree 2ays ,ublic #$ent. [$iolating 7ec 88? **]
4. [no% to further this blue0'one defence] %hen my #2A head/uarters %ere registered means [in my
case] my home became a 'blue0'one', [totally under common la% &urisdiction 3 not this colour of blue]
and %hen i lea$e my blue 'one, i'm a %alking talking blue0'one [&ust ask my friends] and on top of that:
my rolling cart actually has an 'umbrella' to protect our .UB.IC/ and all these arresting Afficials %ere
%arned not to mess %ith my rubric. Aur 'political baby' %as rolling this chariot +cart on %heels A(2 no
cop can cross that lineB A(2 here's %here this case &ust goes in totally un'charter'ed territory.
1. [upon re$ie% of my case] #lections *anada claimed that i had the right to file under 7ec 88= **,
1. but i needed to file this claim against the *#A +*:A of #lections ;ancou$er, %ho must pay it.
4. A(2 this is %here it gets '$ery interesting', There is no *#A or *:A for #lections ;ancou$er
a. [in la% that cannot happen] 0 in my last posting i called this racketeering for lack of a better term
and legally it's called and open and shut case of $iolating 7ec 88H **: *riminal breach of :iduciary
trust, by 4 or 8 %itnesses (A9#D. 9r. )oberson, 9r. *hu, [and %hoC]. In la%, this is co$ered
under 7ec 8F5 ** [:)A"2] in fact, there is no ecuse for this $iolation, all the #ssential #lements
of tyranny (A9#D.: 7ec 88H **, 7ec 88= **, and 7ec 88? *c%ere all broken in one day, A(2
that's %hy i thanked my arresting officers for gi$ing me such a great case to pursue, because the
arresting ,eace officer [2 9artin] told me '9r. !oyer, you're :ree to go build more of those cookies,
after %e let you out of this paddy %aggon' 3 I like this contract
1. A(2 frankly this ci$ili'ation process that i'm doing, is all about protecting oursel$es under
common la% &urisdiction la%, actually can protects us, from tyranny [total abuse of blue la%s]

H. [No, back to t'e topic on defining 'blue la,s'# ) $ !ig 9 2rug 9art [1E?>] struck do%n the original
meaning of this %ord 'blue la% 0 by declaring that 6od %as no longer 7upreme [the #*A(A9. %as].
a. This total dis'tort'ion of the founding principles is the genesis of all ne% torts in *anada. 7ince then
!D"# DA@ no% means, that politicians, &udges,la%yers, etc, ha$e created a %hole ne% breed of case la%,
%here under tort la% all la%s that are *onstitutional are no% routinely gutted, and ruled as tri$ial, %hich
means tort la% has construed you and me into being 'goyum' [a Jionist term for not /uite human, therefor
handled as cattle in order to be chattel under 7ec 88? **.] @e really ha$e become the automatons of
misery that Kefferson %arned e$eryone about 4>5 years ago about %hat those !A(17T#)7 %ere up to.
1. As to )om =, the torture of the Dord's 2ay Act has dis'tort'ed the mindset of those in our legal system
14 We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin. 15 I do not understand what I
do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. 16 And if I do what I do not want to do, I aree that
the law is ood. 1! As it is, it is no loner I m"self who do it, but it is sin livin in me. 1# For I know that ood
itself does not dwell in me, that is, in m" sinful nature.$%& For I have the desire to do what is ood, but I %annot
%arr" it out. 1' For I do not do the ood I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do(this I keep on doin.
)* +ow if I do what I do not want to do, it is no loner I who do it, but it is sin livin in me that does it. )1 ,o I
find this law at work - Althouh I want to do ood, evil is riht there with me. )) For in m" inner bein I
deliht in .od/s law; )0 but I see another law at work in me, wain war aainst the law of m" mind and makin
me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within me. )4 What a wret%hed man I am1
=. i'm con$inced that my challenge to the Act of 7upremacy, is the cornerstone to returning to normati$e order
%hich is a legal term for 'returning to' Isaiah 4 prophecy of turning %eapons into ploughshares and ne$er
train for %ar again. A(2 this is not only possible, but ine$itable, %hen the 7** actually recogni'es that
'no !A2. is abo$e the la%,' fies e$ery mess and e$ery trap created by tort la% since the formation of the
*anon la%.[141> or so] 0 ?55 years of tort la% application, simply disappears %ith this 'no !ody is abo$e
the la%' trust challenge. I personally ha$e nothing to loose, but by life because my faith is forged by the
fact that i face much larger conse/uences if i shrink from pressing this 10@A)2 solution onto the 7**,
a. !ecause, %hen you're placed %ith a hea$y burden, you rise to the occasion or get crushed by the
%eight of this burden, A(2 in this peculiar %ay, i'm demonstrably sho%ing a %ays and means to ,eacefully
fi our :ree and 2emocratic society, by returning to these $alues that freely bind us all into a free society.
8. I'm facing a %all of illusion that created this beast from %ithin. All i can do is make an offer for the 7** to
take a chance on Do$e, %hen gi$en a chance to &ust take it all, by undertaking a ,eaceful makeo$er.