Professional Documents
Culture Documents
but also have a null in the intensity on-axis. In this way, one on axis in a one-dimensional 共1D兲 model, ␥2 = ␥z2共1 + K2 / 2兲,
greatly eases the problem of thermal loading at the first ra- q = Kk2 / 4␥kzq, K = e兩B̃⬜w兩 / mckw is the undulator parameter,
diation beam-directing mirror optic downstream of undulator
where 兩B̃⬜w兩 is the undulator field magnitude, kw = 2 / w is
关5,6兴. The coupling to these modes, as well as to other
the undulator wave number and ĝⴱq = 共êz ⫻ êw兲 · êⴱq is the polar-
higher-order paraxial modes, can be investigated directly by
ization alignment factor which measures the relative align-
an expansion of the high-gain FEL radiation field in terms of
ment of the transverse electron motion in the undulator 共êz
guided LG eigenmodes of a QIM.
⫻ êw兲 with the electric-field mode polarization direction 共êq兲.
In this paper, the coupled excitation equations of the gen-
The EM field mode overlap in the virtual dielectric is given
eralized virtual dielectric expansion description are specified
and solved for an LG expansion basis. Results are compared by q,q
d
⬘
, the mode coupling coefficient Qq,q⬘ gives the EM
to numerical simulations performed using the FEL code GEN- field coupling to the wiggling, density-modulated e-beam 共or
ESIS 1.3 关7兴. The radiation fields are examined in the context e-beam optical current兲, and Fq,q⬘ is the beam profile overlap
of differential power gain, spot size evolution, input seed coefficient, which measures the spatial overlap of the e-beam
coupling efficiency, detuning efficiency enhancement, and profile with the expansion modes q , q⬘.
higher-order mode coupling. The LG Gaussian mode basis The coupled equations in Eq. 共3兲 fully describe the exci-
also provides a straightforward way to examine the accuracy tation and dynamic evolution of the signal field and density
of the single Gaussian mode approximation 共SGM兲 devel- modulation during the FEL interaction, from the startup pe-
oped in paper I for predicting the supermode r.m.s. spot size. riod through the high-gain regime. The equations can be
The coupling to, and in situ generation of, dominant higher- solved for an arbitrarily shaped e-beam profile. The effects of
order LG signal fields that contain OAM at the fundamental longitudinal space charge are also included, assuming that
operating frequency is also suggested and briefly examined. the characteristic transverse e-beam radius is greater than the
bunching wavelength 共r0 ⬎ ␥z兲 such that fringing fields are
II. COUPLED EXCITATION EQUATIONS neglected. It will be shown here, however, that the equations
still adequately describe many of the pertinent features of the
In the formulation derived in paper I, the time-harmonic
FEL when r0 ⬃ ␥z.
signal fields of the FEL are approximated as dominantly
transverse, forward propagating guided waves, and are writ-
ten as a sum over basis modes with slowly growing coeffi- III. GUIDED LAGUERRE-GAUSSIAN MODES
cient amplitudes
The basis eigenmodes used in the expansions of the fields
Ẽគ ⬜共r兲 = 兺 Cq共z兲Eគ̃ ⬜q共r⬜兲eikzqz . 共1兲 and the density modulation satisfy the dielectric field equa-
q tion
The axial wave number for each mode q is taken to be real
here and is given by kzq. In a linear model, the e-beam charge ⵜ⬜
2
Eគ̃ ⬜q共r⬜兲 + 关n共r⬜兲2k2 − kzq
2
兴Eគ̃ ⬜q共r⬜兲 = 0, 共4兲
density is written as n共rគ , t兲 = n0 f共r⬜兲 + Re关ñ1共r兲e−it兴 where where the variation in the refractive index is taken to be
n0 is the on-axis electron density and f共r⬜兲 is the transverse small in the paraxial approximation ⵜn共r⬜兲2 Ⰶ k. The spatial
density profile of the e-beam. The density modulation ñ1共r兲 dependence of n共r⬜兲2 in Eq. 共4兲 fully determines the func-
is also expanded in terms of the transverse waveguide eigen- tional form of the expansion basis in the excitation equa-
modes tions. To obtain the desired guided Laguerre-Gaussian modes
k⑀0 we choose the refractive index of a QIM, with a specified
ñ1共r兲 = 兺 Bq共z兲Ẽ⬜q共r⬜兲ei共/vz0兲z , 共2兲 quadratic spatial dependence of the form
冉冊
e q
2
r
where Bq共z兲 is the slowly varying amplitude of the density n2共r兲 = n20 − , 共5兲
zR
modulation with transverse dependence given by the mode
function Ẽ⬜q共r⬜兲. This expansion allows the density wave where zR = kw20 / 2 is the Rayleigh length and w0 is the char-
with phase dependence 共z / vz0 − t兲 to be described in terms acteristic waist size of a transversely Gaussian mode profile.
of the orthogonal field basis functions. The coupled excita- The refractive index on axis n0 can be set to unity for sim-
tion equations for the FEL interaction derived in paper I are plicity. By inserting Eq. 共5兲 into Eq. 共4兲 we obtain guided LG
modes which have the form 关8–10兴
冑
d
Cq共z兲 = − iqĝⴱqBq共z兲eiqz − i 兺 q,q⬘Cq⬘共z兲ei共q⬘−q兲z ,
d
dz 2 p!
q⬘ Ẽ⬜;p,l共r, 兲 = Ã p,l 共− 1兲 p
w20 共p + 兩l兩兲!
d2
dz
2
j
1
2 Bq共z兲 + p 兺 Fq,jB j共z兲 = − ⴱ 兺 Qq,q⬘Cq⬘共z兲e
ĝqq q⬘
−iq⬘z
, ⫻e−ile−r
2/w2
0 冉冑冊 冉 冊
r 2
w0
兩l兩
L兩l兩
p
2r2
w20
, 共6兲
063831-2
VIRTUAL DIELECTRIC ... . II. MODELING AND ... PHYSICAL REVIEW A 77, 063831 共2008兲
mode index q now takes on two values 共p , l兲 corresponding where 共 nk 兲 = n ! / k ! 共n − k兲! is the binomial coefficient. We note
to the radial and azimuthal mode indices, respectively. 共We that, since n2共r兲 is axisymmetric, 共p,l兲,共p d
vanishes be-
will use both q and p, l mode indices interchangeably when ⬘,l⬘兲
tween modes with different azimuthal dependence 共l ⫽ l⬘兲.
the multiple indexes are cumbersome兲. LG modes of this Analytic expressions for the beam profile overlap factor
type provide a convenient working basis to model the FEL
Fq,q⬘ can be found for many functional e-beam profile distri-
radiation for geometries that are largely axisymmetric over
butions. Here, the e-beam is assumed to have a fixed, Gauss-
the interaction length. The field modes in Eq. 共6兲 are identi-
cal in the transverse dependence to free-space LG fields that ian transverse profile f共r⬜兲 = exp共−r2 / r20兲 throughout the in-
satisfy the paraxial wave equation, when the free-space teraction length, where r0 is the r.m.s. radius. In terms of the
modes are evaluated at the optical beam waist. The explicit LG mode expansion basis, Fq,q⬘ becomes
dependence on the Rayleigh length zR in Eq. 共5兲 defines a
specific form for the dielectric profile in which a free-space à p⬘,l⬘ ␦l,l⬘共− 1兲 p+p⬘
F共p,l兲,共p⬘,l⬘兲 =
Laguerre-Gaussian mode with waist size w0 共defined here as à p,l 冑p ! p⬘ ! 共p + 兩l兩兲 ! 共p⬘ + 兩l⬘兩兲!
the r.m.s. radius of the Gaussian field profile兲 will propagate
as a guided eigenmode of the virtual dielectric. In this con-
struct, if the guiding features of the e-beam in an FEL during
⫻
共p + p⬘ + 兩l兩兲 ! 共 兲
w20 p+p⬘
2r20
共 兲 p+p⬘+兩l兩+1
exponential gain are equivalent to those of the QIM, only a w20
single mode in the expansion is required to fully describe the 2r20
+1
冉 冉 冊冊
supermode.
The axial wave numbers of the QIM eigenmodes in Eq. 2r20 2
⫻ 2F1 − p⬘ ;− p;− p⬘ − p − 兩l兩;1 − ,
共6兲 differ from the wave numbers of vacuum paraxial modes w20
关10,11兴. The waves are modified both in the total wave num- 共10兲
ber by the presence of the homogeneous dielectric contribu-
⬁
2F1共a ; b ; c ; x兲 = 兺n=0共a兲n共b兲nx / 共c兲nn!
n
tion kn0, and by a transverse wave number factor attributed where is the hypergeo-
to the guided focusing of the paraxial wave due to the para- metric series and 共a兲n = a共a + 1兲共a + 2兲 ¯ 共a + n − 1兲 is the ris-
bolic spatial dependence. Inserting Eq. 共5兲 and 共6兲 into Eq. ing factorial. For a single Gaussian EM mode, F共0,0兲,共0,0兲
共4兲 we obtain the axial wave number associated with each w2
= 1 / 共1 + 2r02 兲. The e-beam mode coupling parameter Qq,q⬘ is
guided mode kzq = kz;p,l: 0
thus
冉冊
4
2
kz;p,l = k2n20 − 共2p + 兩l兩 + 1兲. 共7兲 共kz;p⬘,l⬘ + kw兲2 K 2
ⴱ
w20 Q共p,l兲,共p⬘,l⬘兲 = JJ 2p ĝ共p,l兲 ĝ共p⬘,l⬘兲F共p,l兲,共p⬘,l⬘兲 .
8kz;p,l ␥
This describes modal dispersion in the virtual dielectric
共11兲
wherein each mode propagates with an axial phase velocity
/ kz;p,l. For modes where the electric-field polarization matches the
Since the axial field component of the LG modes has a direction of wiggling motion of the electrons ĝ共p,l兲 = 1. This
magnitude on the order of / w0 times as large as the asso- “polarization matched” condition is assumed throughout the
ciated transverse component, the fields can be considered to remainder of this paper.
be dominantly transverse. For TE modes, we then have a Equations 共9兲–共11兲 are the individual elements of the cou-
simple relation between the electric and magnetic compo- pling and overlap terms in the FEL evolution and excitation
nents: Eគ̃ ⬜q = −共 / kzq兲êz ⫻ Bគ̃ ⬜q. The mode power, defined as equations in Eq. 共3兲, solved specifically using the guided LG
Pq = 21 Re关兰兰共Eគ̃ ⬜q共r⬜兲 ⫻ H ⴱ
គ̃ ⬜q 共r⬜兲兲 · êzd2r⬜兴 becomes mode basis. With these terms, the eigensolution of Eq. 共3兲 for
the dominant FEL supermode can be found as a superposi-
kz;p,l tion of LG modes. The supermode emerges during high-gain
P p,l = 兩Ã p,l兩2 . 共8兲
2 0 and propagates self-similarly and with an exponentially
growing field amplitude. Accordingly, the supermode field is
The dielectric mode coupling parameter q,q d
in Eq. 共3兲 is
⬘ defined as Ẽគ SM共r兲 = eikSM z兺 p,lb p,lEគ̃ p,l共r⬜兲 and maintains a fixed
defined in general in paper I, and can be evaluated explicitly transverse profile given by the constant mode coefficients b p,l
冋
using the LG basis
and the distinct complex wave number kSM = k +˜ ␦k. The
d k2 2 modification of the free-space wave number due the FEL
共p,l兲,共p⬘,l⬘兲 = ␦l,l⬘ 共n20 − 1兲␦ p,p⬘ − 2 2 interaction is given by ˜ ␦k, and is found from the solution to
2kz;p,l w 0k
冉 冊
the supermode matrix equation
⫻ 冑 p ! p ⬘!
兺
共p + 兩l兩兲 ! 共p⬘ + 兩l兩兲! j=0
p p⬘
兺
j⬘=0
p + 兩l兩
兩l兩 + j
␦k − 兲2 − 2pM
兵关Iគគ 共˜ ␦k + គ d − ⌬k
គ 兴关Iគ˜ គគ 其bគ = 0គ ,
=兴 + Q 共12兲
冉 冊 册
where the matrix elements of M គគ are given by Mq,q⬘
p⬘ + 兩l兩 共− 1兲 j+j⬘+p+p⬘
共j + j⬘ + 兩l兩 + 1兲! = 共kzq⬘ / kzq兲Fq,q⬘, and the matrices គ d and Q
គ are comprised
⫻ , of the elements in Eqs. 共9兲 and 共11兲, respectively. The param-
兩l兩 + j⬘ j ! j ⬘!
eter is the detuning in a 1D model and the matrix ⌬k =
共9兲 has elements 共kz;p,l − k兲␦ p,p⬘␦l,l⬘. The dominant mode of the
063831-3
HEMSING, GOVER, AND ROSENZWEIG PHYSICAL REVIEW A 77, 063831 共2008兲
冉 1+
w2g
2r20
冊冋 1−
2
kw2gQ1/3
册 3
= 1. 共13兲
gate with the e-beam. Figures 3 and 4 follow the longitudinal
evolution of the signal field for several input spot sizes, with
15
The solution for wg can be used as an estimate for the super- w0 =4 r0
mode spot size of an FEL that is dominated by the funda- 14
mental transverse mode. This technique also provides a use-
ful value for the expansion mode size w0 that is used in Eq. LG (cm) 13 w0 =3 r0
共6兲, and is explored for the model FEL in Fig. 1.
12
w0 =2 r0
063831-4
VIRTUAL DIELECTRIC ... . II. MODELING AND ... PHYSICAL REVIEW A 77, 063831 共2008兲
10.0
1.0
6 0.8
0.6 9.5
w 5 0.4 1 dP
r0 0.2 (m-1 ) 9.0
0.0 P dz
4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
r/r 0
8.5
3
8.0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
z (m) z (m)
FIG. 3. 共Color online兲 Evolution of the intensity profile 共left兲 and differential power 共right兲 modeled for the VISA FEL operating as a
single-pass seed amplifier. Input seed waists ws0 = 3r0,4r0, and 5r0 of a free-space Gaussian mode are injected coaxially to the e-beam and
are positioned at the undulator entrance. The supermode evolves after the fluctuations settle ⬃1.5 m downstream of injection. Solid lines are
solutions to theory from Eq. 共3兲 and points are from GENESIS simulations. The onset of saturation processes is evident near the undulator exit
in the GENESIS data, using a P = 0.1 W radiation power input, and the shot noise turned off. The effects of longitudinal space-charge waves
are neglected. Inset: Normalized transverse intensity 共solid兲 and phase 共dashed兲 profile distribution of the supermode. The vertical axis is in
radians.
the Gaussian beam waist located at the undulator entrance regime where r0 ⬃ ␥z, the “parallel plate capacitor” assump-
z0 = 0, for the system operating at resonance = 0. The r.m.s. tion made for the modulated space-charge fields in the exci-
e-beam radius r0 is fixed throughout the interaction length, tation equations still provides reliable results.
and is set to r0 = 80 m as determined by the physical emit- In a seeded FEL system, the output power efficiency can
tance and -matching constraints for the physical VISA un- be affected, and enhanced, by several design or radiation
dulator focusing lattice. In Fig. 3 the effects of longitudinal injection schemes 关15兴. Experimentally, the simplest method
space charge are turned off, and in Fig. 4 they are included to maximize the available efficiency is to operate off-
for comparison. For each modeled seed injection, the system resonance, i.e., “detune” the system by increasing the e-beam
shows clear dynamic evolution toward the supermode. The energy 共or by increasing the input seed frequency兲. This ef-
input fields are shown to undergo a short period of diffrac- fect has been recently observed experimentally 关16兴, and is
tion during startup before high gain develops. This dynamic explored here with the LG dielectric mode expansion for the
behavior is also sensitively recorded in the differential VISA FEL. Figure 5 shows the dependence of the power
power, where fluctuations are clearly observed before the gain length LG on the electron beam energy. It is clear that
field eventually settles into fixed gain, fixed profile propaga- the shortest gain length is obtained with a positive shift from
tion. This regime of the supermode is also where the effects resonance in the e-beam energy 共 ⬍ 0兲.
of longitudinal space-charge waves are most pronounced, The relationship between the efficiency and the gain char-
identified by the observed reduction in the exponential gain acteristics is also of practical interest for prediction of the
per unit length 共Fig. 4兲. The VISA-FEL is an exemplar of optimal spot size and axial waist position of the injected seed
this intermediate regime where the effects of space-charge mode. Once the supermode is established, the FEL should
waves are significant, but not dominant, and must be in- behave similarly to a single-mode waveguide 1D FEL, but
cluded in the full calculation for accuracy. In both cases modified by the overall beam profile overlap factor F that
共space-charge on and off兲, the predicted evolution calculated quantifies the departure of the 3D peak gain from the 1D
from the coupled excitation equations in Eq. 共3兲 closely value. The VISA FEL operates in the strongly coupled re-
matches the results from simulations performed with GEN- gime, where the 1D power gain is given by the G1D
= 共1 / 9兲e冑3Q L 关17兴. In the 3D scenario, the gain is expected
1/3
ESIS 1.3 关7兴, which also includes the effects of fringing in the
space-charge fields. This suggests that, even in the VISA to differ from the 1D model, both in the exponential depen-
7 9.0
1.0
6 0.8
8.5
0.6
w 0.4
5 1 dP
r0 0.2 (m-1 ) 8.0
0.0 P dz
4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
7.5
r/r 0
3
7.0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
z (m) z (m)
FIG. 4. 共Color online兲 Spot size and power evolution. Running conditions are identical to those in Fig. 3, but with the effects of
longitudinal space-charge waves included 共 p = 3.22 m−1兲. Points indicate results from GENESIS simulations. Inset: Normalized transverse
intensity 共solid兲 and phase 共dashed兲 profile distribution of the supermode.
063831-5
HEMSING, GOVER, AND ROSENZWEIG PHYSICAL REVIEW A 77, 063831 共2008兲
7 7 0.9
6 6 0.8
0.7
5 5
0.6
4 4
z 0 L 1D 0.5
3 3
0.4
2 2 0.3
1 1 0.2
0 0 0.1
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
ηeff
ws0 r 0 ws0 r 0
FIG. 6. 共Color online兲 The supermode excitation efficiency eff for Gaussian seed injection at resonance 共left plot, = 0 m−1兲 and at a
detuning corresponding to the minimum gain length 共right, = −2.7 m−1兲. Different longitudinal positions z0 共vertical兲 and sizes of the
Gaussian seed waist ws0 共horizontal兲 are modeled for the VISA FEL.
063831-6
VIRTUAL DIELECTRIC ... . II. MODELING AND ... PHYSICAL REVIEW A 77, 063831 共2008兲
10 8
8 6
w 1 dP
(m-1 ) 4
r0 6 P dz
4 2
0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
z (m) z (m)
FIG. 7. 共Color online兲 Comparison of signal field propagation for FEL seeding with a pure Gaussian mode 共dashed兲 and a l = 1 OAM
mode 共solid兲, when the effects of plasma space-charge waves are included. Both input seed waists are located z0 = 25 cm inside the undulator
entrance, with the e-beam detuned to = −8.2 m−1.
gain. Also, in contrast to seeding with modes with different profile. It is particularly clear from the phase that the struc-
radial mode numbers ps 共either as pure modes or as a super- ture is that of a dominant 共p , l兲 = 共0 , 1兲 LG mode 共helical
position兲, the eventual output FEL signal fields generated phase evolution兲, and that the field is gain-guided from the
from seeds with different azimuthal mode numbers ls do not slight appearance of inward curvature near the axis.
evolve to equal transverse sizes. This is because, for an axi- It is noted that the amplification of light with OAM
symmetric e-beam profile f共r⬜兲 = f共r兲, the modes with differ- should impart a self-consistent orbital momentum to the
ent p values couple to each other, but the different l modes source e-beam. The effects of this interaction on the overall
do not. Thus, an excited higher-order radial mode can e-beam dynamics are calculated to be small relative to the
couple, cascading down toward the fundamental radial mode dominant FEL interactions considered here, and are ne-
of the system 共usually the Gaussian兲, but the higher-order l glected.
modes are locked. This, combined with the reduced gain These results on the amplification of OAM modes at the
length, demonstrates that the character of the final output fundamental frequency of the FEL device suggest that, since
OAM mode is specifically determined by the input seed an initial bunching modulation at the fundamental mode
field. The ls mode of the seed is the lone azimuthal mode typically dominates the interaction, amplification of a domi-
excited in the FEL interaction for the cold e-beam, and thus nant azimuthal mode requires a dominant azimuthal excita-
defines the fundamental azimuthal mode of the final EM sig- tion at startup. We have shown that this can be achieved
nal field. The system evolves to a state characterized by the either by injection of an OAM seed mode with the appropri-
features associated with the ls ⬎ 0 seed mode, including the ate intensity amplitude 共if available at the operating fre-
waist size, gain length, and helical phase evolution. As a quency兲, or by introduction of the appropriate spatial modu-
result, all of the gain delivered to the radiation field is de- lation that is not azimuthally symmetric to the injected beam.
posited only into the l = ls input OAM mode, and a scenario The magnitude of these respective initial conditions provides
that delivers pure OAM amplification, in the absence of a guideline for required parameters needed to obtain OAM
SASE effects, is realized. In the presence of SASE, in order modes in the presence of SASE, and will be explored further
to ignore it’s effects, one must seed with power well in ex- in future work.
cess of SASE startup power, and also take care that the total
共potentially higher兲 gain in the fundamental does not allow V. CONCLUSIONS
this SASE mode to compete with the final power in the de-
sired l ⫽ 0 LG mode. We have presented a study of the high-gain VISA FEL in
Generation of coherent OAM light without a seed field the virtual dielectric mode description, specified for a guided
input can be investigated in this model by introducing a Laguerre-Gaussian mode expansion basis, with an emphasis
dominant helical density modulation on the e-beam. The
density modulation in Eq. 共2兲 identifies the longitudinal Intensity Phase
4 4
bunching in terms of the expansion mode functions. Nonzero
2 2
values for B0,0共0兲 identify a prebunching modulation at the
fundamental that can be related to longitudinal shot noise, or y/r0 0 0
a SASE startup scenario. The coefficients B p,l ⫽ 0 for 兩l兩 ⬎ 0 -2 -2
describe azimuthal structures in the e-beam, and helical -4 -4
structures occur when B p,l ⫽ B p,−l. Figure 8 shows the trans- -4 -2 0 2 4 -4 -2 0 2 4
x/r0 x/r0
verse intensity and phase at the undulator exit for a solution
of the excitation equations with a relative initial density FIG. 8. Radiation intensity and phase at undulator exit, gener-
modulation of B0,1 / B0,0 = 105 共all other coefficients are zero兲 ated by a dominant 共p , l兲 = 共0 , 1兲 initial helical density modulation in
for VISA. The relative magnitude of each amplitude is de- the e-beam. A hollow mode structure is evident in the intensity
termined by iteration, such that the higher-order hollow distribution and is accompanied by a helical azimuthal phase
mode becomes visibly dominant in the transverse intensity variation.
063831-7
HEMSING, GOVER, AND ROSENZWEIG PHYSICAL REVIEW A 77, 063831 共2008兲
on OAM mode operation. This interest in OAM modes is due to the dominance of the fundamental modes of the typi-
driven by the desire to obtain hollow intensity modes that cal FEL system, the excitation of a dominant OAM mode
provide power-handling advantages, as well as by applica- requires either an OAM seed, or a significant azimuthal den-
tions that depend on the orbital angular momentum in the sity modulation in the e-beam.
light pulse. The results of the evolution excitation equations
and the supermode matrix equations derived in paper I of
this work show good agreement with GENESIS simulations, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
with the effects of longitudinal space-charge included. The
LG mode basis provides a natural description of guided FEL This research was supported by grants from the Depart-
radiation by virtue of its connection to the paraxial modes of ment of Energy Basic Energy Science Contract No. DOE
free space, and allows the investigation of coupling to modes DE-FG02-07ER46272 and Office of Naval Research Con-
that contain orbital angular momentum. Results suggest that tract No. ONR N00014-06-1-0925.
关1兴 E. Hemsing, A. Gover, and J. Rosenzweig, preceding paper, ford Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering 共Oxford
Phys. Rev. A 77, 063830 共2008兲. University Press, Oxford, 1997兲.
关2兴 L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and J. P. 关11兴 A. Siegman, Lasers 共University Science Books, New York,
Woerdman, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185 共1992兲. 1986兲.
关3兴 A. Siegman, Optical Angular Momentum 共IOP Publishing, 关12兴 A. Tremaine et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 204801 共2002兲.
London, 2003兲.
关13兴 A. Murokh et al., Phys. Rev. E 67, 066501 共2003兲.
关4兴 A. G. Peele, P. J. McMahon, D. Paterson, C. Q. Tran, A. P.
关14兴 G. Andonian, M. P. Dunning, A. Y. Murokh, C. Pellegrini, S.
Mancuso, K. A. Nugent, J. P. Hayes, E. Harvey, B. Lai, and I.
Reiche, J. B. Rosenzweig, M. Babzien, I. Ben-Zvi, and V.
McNulty, Opt. Lett. 27, 1752 共2002兲.
关5兴 G. Andonian et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 054801 共2005兲. Yakimenko, Proceedings of FEL2006 Conference, 443–446
关6兴 W. B. Colson, J. Blau, R. L. Armstead, and P. P. Crooker, Nucl. 共2006兲.
Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 528, 167 共2004兲. 关15兴 J. B. Murphy and C. Pellegrini, in Laser Handbook, edited by
关7兴 S. Reiche, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 429, 243 W. Colson, C. Pellegrini, and A. Renieri 共North Holland, Am-
共1999兲. sterdam, 1990兲, Vol. 6, Chap. 5.
关8兴 O. Georg, Appl. Opt. 21, 141 共1982兲. 关16兴 X. J. Wang, T. Watanabe, Y. Shen, R. K. Li, J. B. Murphy, T.
关9兴 L. Yu, W. Huang, M. Huang, Z. Zhu, X. Zeng, and W. Ji, J. Tsang, and H. P. Freund, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 181115 共2007兲.
Phys. A 31, 9353 共1998兲. 关17兴 E. Jerby and A. Gover, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 21, 1041
关10兴 A. Yariv, Optical Electronics in Modern Communications, Ox- 共1985兲.
063831-8