Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Received January 4, 2005; accepted (in revised form) April 26, 2005; Published online March 13, 2006
NOMENCLATURE
507
0885-7474/06/0900-0507/0 © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
508 Shang
σ: Electric conductivity;
: Frequency.
1. INTRODUCTION
Magneto-fluid-dynamics interaction has recently reemerged as one of the
few last frontiers for fluid dynamic research [1]. Magneto-fluid-dynamics
interactions have been widely applied and have demonstrated an impres-
sive potential for flow control [2–5]; MHD scramjet bypass engines [6],
innovative radiatively driven hypersonic wind tunnels [7] and combustion
or ignition enhancement [8]. To accurately assess the relative magnitude of
electromagnetic and aerodynamic forces in an interaction, an accurate evalu-
ation of the plasma transport properties, such as the charge particle number
density, temperatures, and electric conductivity, are required.
A widely used non-intrusive plasma diagnostic tool is microwave
probing [9–11]. The microwave system is adopted both for plasma diag-
nostics and deep-space communication. For plasma diagnostics, the num-
ber density of the charge particles and its collision frequency with the
neutral particles are measured based on the microwave attenuation phe-
nomenon [12–15]. This unique microwave behavior in weakly ionized air is
also known for the well-known communication blackout phenomenon in
the reentry phase, either for an aerospace vehicle or for an inter-planetary
voyage. Communication blackout is the consequence of an incident micro-
wave propagating at a frequency equal to or higher than the frequency
of plasma. When the two frequencies are equal, the propagating wave
becomes evanescent and the transmission of the electromagnetic energy
ceases. When the transmission bandwidth is greater than that of the
plasma, the microwave will attenuate as it propagates through the plasma
[16, 17]. The dissipated energy along the wave path is proportional to the
electrical conductivity of the medium.
An electromagnetic wave propagating in an electrically conducting
medium depends strongly on its electrical conductivity and transmission
frequency. The relative magnitude of σ and the product of wave frequency
and electrical permittivity ωε will dominate the behavior of the propa-
gating microwave [17]. Additional complication arises when a microwave
impinges on a boundary of two media. At the interface, a part of the
incident wave is reflected and another part is transmitted into the sec-
ond medium. The intrinsic impedance of the media ultimately controls the
behavior of this electromagnetic field at the interface [17]. In all circum-
stances, there will be a reflected wave from the interface, except when the
two media have the identical impedance, and then the incident wave will
transmit uninterrupted.
Simulating Plasma Microwave Diagnostics 509
2. GOVERNING EQUATIONS
The governing equations for the present effort are built around the
three-dimensional Maxwell equations in the time domain. The closure of
this partial differential equation system requires an additional constitutive
relationship to describe the electrical conduction current, J . The rate of
change for the electrical charge density is derived from the generalized
Ohm’s law [30].
∂B/∂t + ∇ × E = 0, (2.1)
∂D/∂t − ∇ × H = −J, (2.2)
∇ ·B = 0, (2.3)
∇ ·D = ρe , (2.4)
(1/eh )∂J /∂t − σ E + J = 0, (2.5)
where eh is the average collision frequency between electrons and heavy
particles and σ is the electrical conductivity, σ = ne e2 /me eh . ne and me
are the electron number density and mass respectively, and the e is the
electron charge.
For the present investigation, the two Gauss’s laws, Eqs. (2.3) and
(2.4), are automatically satisfied, because the incident microwave is a lin-
ear harmonic transverse electric wave (TE), and the net charged particle
number density ρe , vanishes in the plasma. The global electrically neutral
property of the plasma ensures the second constraint, Eq. (2.4), is satis-
fied. The two divergence equations are therefore, eliminated from the pres-
ent solution scheme.
The governing equations constitute a hyperbolic partial differential
equation system that can be easily cast into the flux vector form with a
generalized curvilinear coordinates [22, 27]:
Simulating Plasma Microwave Diagnostics 511
Fξ = Fξ (ξx Fx , ξy Fy , ξz Fz ),
Fη = Fη (ηx Fx , ηy Fy , ηz Fz ), (2.7)
Fζ = Fζ (ζx Fx , ζy Fy , ζz Fz ),
magnetic field strength H equals the surface density Js . Finally the surface
charge density ρe balances the difference between the normal components
of the electrical displacement D, across the media interface [17];
n × (E1 − E2 ) = 0, (2.11)
n × (H1 − H2 ) = Js , (2.12)
n · (B1 − B2 ) = 0, (2.13)
n · (D1 − D2 ) = ρe . (2.14)
F−
ζ =0 (2.15)
−(ζy2 + ζz2 )/2γ √εµ ζx ζy /2γ √εµ √
ζx ζz /2γ εµ
√ √ √
ζx ζy /2γ εµ −(ζx2 + ζz2 )/2γ εµ ζy ζz /2γ εµ
√ √ √
−(ζx2 + ζy2 )/2γ εµ
Fζ− = ζx ζz /2γ εµ ζy ζz /2γ εµ
0 ζz /2µ −ζy /2µ
−ζ /2µ
z 0 ζx /2µ
ζy /2µ −ζx /2µ 0
0 −ζz /2ε ζy /2ε
ζz /2ε 0 −ζx /2ε
−ζy /2ε ζx /2ε 0
√ √ √ .
−(ζy2 + ζz2 )/2γ εµ ζx ζy /2γ εµ ζx ζz /2γ εµ
√ √ √
ζx ζy /2γ εµ −(ζx2 + ζz2 )/2γ εµ ζy ζz /2γ εµ
√ √ √
ζx ζz /2γ εµ ζy ζz /2γ εµ −(ζx + ζy )/2γ εµ
2 2
For the initial/boundary value problem, the initial value can be easily pre-
scribed by the theoretical results of the transverse electrical wave in the
fundamental mode, TE1,0 , as entrance conditions for either the waveguide
or the antenna [17].
3. NUMERICAL PROCEDURES
Two finite-volume procedures are adopted in the present analysis.
A high-resolution procedure is derived from the compact differencing
Simulating Plasma Microwave Diagnostics 513
scheme [20]. Only the first-order derivative is required for the present anal-
ysis; the formula for the ξ derivative is given as,
αc Uξ (i − 1, j, k) + Uξ (i, j, k) + αc Uξ (I + 1, j, k)
= C1 [Uξ (i + 1, j, k) − Uξ (i − 1, j, k)] + C2 [Uξ (i + 2, j, k) − Uξ (i − 2, j, k)].
(3.1)
In the high-order scheme, the mesh point stencil involves five points
or more and a boundary transition operator becomes necessary. The
staged one-order-lower approximation for the boundary transition scheme
is derived from the summation-by-parts energy analysis [31]. Therefore, a
formally sixth-order interior scheme must be supported by a fifth-order
boundary transition scheme. In the present effort a fourth-order and a
fifth-order one-sided difference formulation are used. In most applications,
this procedure is the source of numerical instability, manifested by spu-
rious high-frequency Fourier components [22, 23]. To maintain numeri-
cal stability for the compact differencing method, a spatial low-pass filter
is incorporated into the high-resolution scheme [23]. For this reason, the
high-resolution procedure is used solely for dispersive and dissipative error
assessment.
The major portion of the present computations is produced by the
numerical procedure derived from the MUSCL (Monotone Upstream-
Centered Schemes for Conservation Laws) scheme [28, 29]. This solu-
tion scheme has a wide range of options in the basic algorithm selection
through the flux vector reconstruction across the control surface of an ele-
mentary volume.
L
Ui+1/2 = Ui + φ/4[(1 − κ)∇ + (1 + κ)∆]Ui , (3.3)
R
Ui+1/2 = Ui − φ/4[(1 + κ)∇ + (1 − κ)∆]Ui , (3.4)
514 Shang
where the superscript L and R denoting the dependent variables that are
evaluated at the left or the right side of the control surface. The differ-
ence operators ∇ and ∆ represent the forward and backward differencing
approximations, respectively. A third-order spatial resolution is achieved as
a windward biased formula by setting φ = 1 and κ = 1/3. Therefore, all
computed results have at least a third-order spatial and fourth-order tem-
poral accuracy.
The implementation of boundary conditions and initial conditions is
straightforward. The most complex no-reflection, far-field boundary condi-
tion is facilitated by the characteristic formulation: at the computational
domain, the incoming flux vectors along each of the transformed coor-
dinates are set to the null value, Eq. (2.15). At the media interfaces, the
outward normal unit vector can be determined to satisfy the Neumann con-
dition. The present analysis uses a build-up process to simulate the plasma
diagnostics; the computational simulations include a wide range of config-
urations of waveguides and pyramidal horn antennas. In general, the initial
value can be easily prescribed by theoretical results of the transverse electri-
cal wave in the fundamental mode, TE1,0 , as entrance conditions for either
the waveguide or the antenna [17]. However, the detailed initial condition for
each computation will be addressed in every specific section of discussion.
The key element of plasma diagnostics using microwave probing is a
pair of pyramidal horn antennas. Their main function is to collimate the
microwave beam and to transmit and receive a microwave across a plasma
medium [9,10]. The schematic of this arrangement is depicted in Fig. 1. In
the present analysis, the microwave transmission is simulated at a frequency
of 12.5 GHz (wavelength of 2.398 cm). The entrance of the pyramidal horn
has the dimensions in wavelengths of (0.397 × 0.928), the smallest and the
normalized length scale is 0.397 wavelengths (0.938 cm). The horn increases
its cross section linearly in both the x and y-directions; its aperture has the
dimensions in wavelengths of (3.045 × 3.640). The total length of the horn
is 3.307 wavelengths. For the present investigation, two groups of computa-
tions for a rectangular waveguide and microwave antennas were conducted.
For each group of simulations, a single mesh system was utilized.
Taking advantage of the symmetrical geometry with respect to the
x-coordinate and the invariant property of the fundamental transverse elec-
trical wave (TE1,0 ) in the y-coordinate, only the upper half-space of the
antenna was simulated by a single mesh system of (74 × 5 × 142) for the
entire computational domain. The mesh system of the three-dimensional
computation is generated by a surface-oriented coordinate transformation.
All coordinates are normalized by the minimum height of the aperture
with the dimensions of (15.74 × 4.71 × 26.89). At the simulated microwave
frequency, the grid density in terms of points per wavelength (PPW) is
maintained at a value no less than 14. Over the entire range of the elec-
tric conductivities 0.0 < σ/ωε < 2.0, the agreement between the results by
the high-resolution and the MUSCL scheme for waveguides and pyramidal
horn antenna is 1.22%. This numerical error assessment is consistent with
the previous computations for microwave propagation where comparisons
with theoretical results are available [25].
For the evaluation of the energy transmission, the Poynting vector
P = E × H , and the instantaneous power transmitted by the microwave
through plasma along the beam path are calculated by the following
equations:
P = −Ez Hy i − Ex Hz j + (Ex Hy − Ey Hx )k, (3.5)
(E × H ) · ds = −1/2∂/∂t [εE 2 + µH 2 ]dV − σ E 2 dV ,
(3.6)
where i, j , and k are the unit vectors in the x, y, and z-direction, an ds
is the surface vector of a control volume associated with an elementary
volume dV .
4. MICROWAVE ATTENUATION
In the frequency spectrum of experimental microwave diagnostics eh2
2 2
<< p << , the measured phase shift depends only upon the electron
number density. The attenuation depends on both density and collision
frequency for momentum transfer [9, 10]. For a transverse plane electro-
magnetic wave in the TE1,0 mode and traveling in the z-direction, the wave
516 Shang
where α and β are the attenuation and phase constants. The phase con-
stant is given by the relationship of β = 2π/λ, and the phase velocity of
the wave is uph = /β. In a rectangular waveguide, the attenuation and
phase constants α and β of the transverse wave can be calculated by the
following formula:
Fig. 2. Validating microwave attenuation in isotopic plasma TE1,0 wave, = 4 GHz, 0.0 <
σ/ ε < 0.25.
for both the compact difference and MUSCL scheme. The entire compu-
tational domain consists of 10 wavelengths and the square waveguide has
sidewall dimensions of one wavelength each. The plasma sheet strides the
guided wave at the midpoint of the waveguide and has a thickness of two
wavelengths. The plasma sheet is characterized by a uniform and greater
electrical conductivity, σ = 0.75 ε.
In Fig. 3, the x-component of the magnetic field strength along the
microwave path is presented. For purpose of comparison, the same var-
iable in free space is appended in the figure as a reference. From the
numerical results, the magnetic field is substantially distorted by the reflec-
tions from the media interfaces. This behavior is drastically different from
the numerical results describing the microwave motion that is completely
confined within the plasma. The reflected wave from the incident inter-
face produces a wave cancellation toward its origin. In the plasma domain,
the microwave magnetic component exhibits a significant distortion, and
remerges at the exit interface showing attenuation in wave amplitude. This
interference has been known to obscure plasma absorption measurements
518 Shang
Fig. 3. Magnetic field of microwave in plasma sheet TE1,0 wave, = 4 GHz, σ = 0.75 ε.
[9, 10], and is demonstrated for the first time in the present numerical
simulation.
The y-component of the electrical field intensity of the TE1,0 wave
is depicted in Fig. 4. Again the reflected wave from the media interfaces
substantially distorts the electrical field of the microwave in direct contrast
to the microwave propagating in the plasma without interface boundaries.
For the electrical field component, the reflected wave from the incident
media interface exhibits a much more pronounced phase shift and ampli-
tude reduction.
The overall computed field structure substantiates the observation
that the reflections from the media interfaces create a very complex
wave structure within the plasma sheet, but the attenuated microwave
still retains most of its incident wave characteristics. Since the microwave
measurement is an integrated result from the beam path, it reflects only
an accumulated effect. The measurement is therefore sampling-condition
dependent and no general conclusion can be drawn to compensate the
effects of reflection.
Simulating Plasma Microwave Diagnostics 519
Fig. 4. Electric field of microwave in plasma sheet TE1,0 wave, = 4 GHz, σ = 0.75 ε.
Fig. 5. Microwave radiating field for plasma diagnostics TE1,0 wave, = 12.5 GHz.
out; first, the wave radiating from the transmitting horn is well structured
and undisturbed until the wave impinges onto the exiting computational
domain and the reflected wave from the exiting boundary is insignificant.
Second, the wavelength of the microwave is modified from the entrance to
the aperture to reflect the wave speed differential from the waveguide to
the antenna exit to agree with the theory of antenna [32, 33]. Third, strong
wave interference is easily detected in the receiving horn.
Figure 6 presents all electromagnetic field components (Bx , Bz , and
Ey ) of the transverse TE1,0 wave when the wave has traversed the entire
computational domain. The wave interaction resulting from the reflected
waves from the metallic surface of the receiving antenna can also be seen.
However, the edge diffractions from the antennas are not detectable from
the computed results. The behavior of the x-component of the magnetic
flux density Bx appears almost as a mirror image of the y-component of
electrical field strength Ey . In fact, they are completely out of phase from
each other.
In the continuously expanding structure of radiation within the trans-
mitting antenna, the energy flux density increases with the increasing size
Simulating Plasma Microwave Diagnostics 521
of the control volume along the beam path. The reverse behavior is also
observed in the receiving antenna; however a part of the reduced power
transmitted is due to the reflected wave from the antenna surface. For
the microwave that propagates through free space without any attenuation
the time-averaged ratio of power received at the apertures of the horns is
around 0.1905. In other words, only one fifth of the microwave energy of
the TE1,0 wave is received for the plasma diagnostic arrangement and the
rest has been propagated and reflected into free space. This finding is ver-
ified by the experimental observation [14].
Fig. 7. Comparison of EM fields in free space and passing through plasma column TE1,0
wave, = 12.5 GHz, w = λ, d = 0.46λ.
Fig. 8. Poynting vector of microwave passing through plasma column TE1,0 wave, =
12.5 GHz, w = λ, d = 0.46λ.
the receiving antenna is 2.7% and the observed phase shift in Fig. 6 is too
small to be quantified.
In short, the diffraction in a microwave beam path by a weakly
ionized gas column of a relatively low electrical conductivity (σ/ ε =
0.25) is detectable by numerical simulation by the distorted wave fringe
pattern. The reflection by the media interface is inseparable from the
plasma absorption by the present computation, but the total wave atten-
uation by the finite-dimension plasma column can be determined. Unfor-
tunately, there is neither theory nor experimental data to facilitate a direct
comparison.
Fig. 9. Radiating field of microwave pass through plasma sheet, = 12.5 GHz, T = 1.823λ,
σ = 69.5 mho/m, at t = 28.52.
Fig. 10. Microwave blackout phenomenon TE1,0 wave, = 12.5 GHz, T = 3λ,
σ = 69.5 mho/m.
Fig. 11. Typical electromagnetic field components in microwave blackout TE1,0 wave, =
12.5 GHz, T = 3λ, σ = 69.5 mho/m.
to zero at z/L = 15.00. This computed result under predicts the theoretical
depth of penetration by 0.7%.
Fig. 12. Poynting vector in microwave blackout TE1,0 wave, = 12.5 GHz, T = 3λ,
σ = 69.5 mho/m.
Fig. 13. Typical magnetic flux density distributions along the microwave beam path TE1,0
wave, = 12.5 GHz, 1 < σ < 12 mho/m.
Fig. 14. Comparison of microwave power distribution in receiving horn antenna TE1,0
wave, = 12.5 GHz, σ ≈ 1 mho/m.
9. CONCLUSIONS
Solutions of the time-dependent Maxwell equations and the general-
ized Ohms law have successfully described the radiating electromagnetic field
for plasma diagnostics using microwave probing. The numerical simulation
duplicates the commonly adopted pyramidal horn antennas arrangement
used in experiment at a transmitting frequency of 12.5 GHz. The diffrac-
tions at the apertures of the antenna and a uniform plasma column in the
beam path are captured in the numerical results.
For all investigated weakly ionized gases with an electrical conductiv-
ity up to 100 mho/m, the wave reflection from the interface of free space
and plasma is negligible. This numerical result fully supports earlier exper-
imental observations.
In the first application for plasma diagnostics in a hypersonic mag-
neto-hydrodynamic channel, the simulated result reaches a reasonable
affinity with experimental observations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The sponsorship from Dr. J. Schmisseur and Dr. F. Fahroo of the Air
Force Office of Scientific Research is deeply appreciated. The stimulating
discussions with Prof. J. Menart of Wright State University, as well as, Dr.
R. Kimmel and J. Hayes of the Air Force Research laboratory are sin-
cerely acknowledged.
REFERENCES
1. Shang, J. S. (2002). Shared knowledge in computational fluid dynamics, electromagnet-
ics, and magneto-aerodynamics. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 38(6–7), 449–467.
2. Roth, J. R. (2000). Electrohydrodynamic flow control with a glow-discharge surface
plasma. AIAA J. 38(7), 1166–1172.
3. Artana, G., Adamo, J., Leger, L., Moreau, E., and Touchard, G. (2002). Flow control
with electrohydrodyamic actuators. AIAA J. 40(9), 1773–1779.
4. Enloe, C. L., McLaughlin, T. E., Van Dyken, R. D., Kachner, K. D., Jumper, E. J., and
Corke, T. J. (2004). Mechanisms and responses of a single dielectric barrier plasma actu-
ator: plasma morphology. AIAA J. 42, 589–594.
5. Shang, J. S., and Surzhikov, S. T. (2004). Magneto-aerodynamic interaction for hyper-
sonic flow control. AIAA J. 43(8), 1633–1643.
6. Park, C., Mehta, U. B., and Bogdanoff, D. W. (2001). MHD Energy bypass scramjet
performance with real gas effects. J. Propul. power 19(5), 1049–1057.
Simulating Plasma Microwave Diagnostics 531
7. Miles, R. B., Brown, G. L., Lempert, W. R., Yetter, R., Williams, G. L., Bogdonoff, S.
M., Natelson, D., and Guest, J.R. (1995). Radiatively driven hypersonic wind tunnel,
AIAA J. 33(8), 1463–1470.
8. Anikin, N., Kukaev, E., Starikovskaia, S., and Starikovskii, A. (2004). Ignition of hydro-
gen-air and methane-air mixtures at low temperatures by nanosecond high voltage dis-
charge. AIAA 2004–0833, Reno NV, January 2004.
9. Heald, M. A., and Wharton, C. B. (1965). Plasma Diagnostics with Microwaves, Wiley,
New York.
10. Golant, V. E. (1983). Methods of diagnostics based on the interaction of electromagnetic
radiation with a plasma, basic plasma physics I. In Galeev, A., and Sudan, R. (eds.),
North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 630–680.
11. Raizer, Yu., and Gas, P. (1991). Discharge Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
12. Smoot, L. D., and Underwood, D. L. (1966). Prediction of microwave attenuation char-
acteristics of rocket exhausts. J. Spacecraft Rockets 3(3), 302–309.
13. Fedrick, R. A., Blevins, J. A., and Coleman, H. W. (1995). Investigation of microwave attenu-
ation measurements in a laboratory-scale motor plume. J. Spacecraft Rockets 32(5), 923–925.
14. Kurpik, A., Menart, J., Shang, J., Kimmel, R., and Hayes, J. (2003). Technique for mak-
ing microwave absorption measurements in a thin plasma discharge. AIAA 2003–3748,
Orlando, FL, 23–26 June 2003.
15. Shang, J. S., Kimmel, R., Hayes, J., Tyler, C., and Menart, J. (2005). Hypersonic mag-
neto-aerodynamic experimental facility for magneto-aerodynamics interaction. J Space-
craft Rockets 42(1).
16. Kennet, H., and Taylor, R. A. (1996). Earth re-entry simulation of planetary entry envi-
ronment. J. Spacecraft Rockets 3(4), 504–512.
17. Krause, J. D. (1953). Electromagnetics, McGraw-Hill, pp.390–481.
18. Henderson, S., Menart, J., Shang, J. S., Kimmel, R., and Hayes, J. (2004). Data reduc-
tion analysis for a cylindrical, double langmuir probe operating in a high speed flow.
AIAA 2004–0360, Reno NV, January 5–8, 2004.
19. Surzhikov, S. T., and Shang, J. S. (2004). Two-Component plasma model for
two-dimensional glow discharge in magnetic field. J. Comp. Phys. 1999, 437–464.
20. Lele, S. K. (1992). Compact difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comp.
Phys. 103, 16–42.
21. Carpenter, M. H., Gottlieb, D., and Abarbanel, S. (1995). Time-stable boundary condi-
tions for finite-difference schemes solving hyperbolic systems: methodology and applica-
tion to higher-order compact systems. J. Comp. Phys. 117, 300–317.
22. Shang, J. S. (1999). High-order compact-difference schemes for time-dependent maxwell
equations. J. Comput. Phys. 153 312–333.
23. Gaitonde, D. V., Shang, J. S., and Young, J.L. (1999). Practical aspects of higher-order
numerical schemes for wave propagation phenomena. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 45,
1849–1869.
24. Taflove, A. (1997). Numerical issues regarding finite-difference time-domain modeling of
microwave structures, time-domain methods for microwave structure analysis and design.
In Itoh, T., and Houshmand, B. IEEE Press, New York, pp. 59–75.
25. Mur, G. (1981). Absorbing boundary conditions for the finite-difference approximation
of the time-domain electromagnetics field equations. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat-
ibility, 23, 377–382.
26. Berenger, J.-P. (1994). A perfect matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic
waves. J. Comp. Phys. 114, 185–200.
27. Shang, J. S., and Fithen, R. M. (1996). A Comparative study of characteristic-based
algorithms for the maxwell equations. Comput. Phys. 125, 378–394.
532 Shang