Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROJECT DONE
BY
SURESH KUMAR.D
(Reg. No – 31608631039)
OF
A PROJECT REPORT
Submittted to the
OF
PROJECT DONE
BY
SURESH KUMAR.D
(Reg. No – 31608631039)
OF
A PROJECT REPORT
Submittted to the
OF
I express my profound thanks to our respected chairperson Thiru. JAYA KUMAR for
his enthusiastic support and helping by providing all resources behind the scenes.
Our special thanks to LECT. MISS. CHITRA, MBA MPHIL –HOD- Department of
Management studies, VELS SRINIVASA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY for giving suggestion on structuring our project.
Our heart full thanks & everlasting thanks to our project guide MR.
LOGANATHA PRASANNA.S , MBA for his valuable suggestion towards the completion of
our project. Also we thank all the lecturers of our department.
(D.SURESH KUMAR)
CONTENT
List of Tables
List of Charts
Abstract
I INTRODUCTION
Introduction
Industry profile
Product Profile
II DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAIN THEME
Objectives of study
Scope of Significance
Limitation of Study
Research Methodology
Findings
Suggestion
Conclusion
Annexure
Bibliography
TABLE NO TITLE PAGE NO
A study on scope of brand preference in kansai nerolac paint. Brand preference shows the
stage of brand loyalty at which a buyer will select a particular brand but will choose a
competitor's brand if the preferred brand is unavailable.
In 2006, on the 11th of July, Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. name has been changed to
Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd.The success of Kansai Nerolac has hinged on this philosophy since
1920, and being the second largest paint company in India is the rightful tribute to its people's
commitment and dedication. With employee strength of around 2000 spread over the country and
an efficient management,to find out the value of money in kansai nerolac paints
The significance of the study is to identify influencer and its influence factor. The scope
is to find out the various influencer involves in it and provides solution to the problem. The
survey conducted was limited to Chennai.
Research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data in a
manner that aims to combine relevance to the research design that will be used for the study is
descriptive research design as its explain the fact and state of affair. The data for this study has
been collected from both primary and secondary data sources Primary data will be collect
through questionnaire that will ask to customer. The secondary data are those which have already
been passed through the statistical process, The size of the population is 120 respondents survey
was conducted in Chennai. The sampling used is Simple Random sampling which comes under
probability. The project was concentrated only in the Vadapalani branch nerolac kansai paint
limited, Chennai.
• Rank correlation
• Anova table
• Chi – square test
• Kolmogorov – Smirnov Test (K-S Test)
In Kansai nerolac Paint, 36% of the respondents have the age group of 30-40 yrs, 31% of the
respondents have age group of 20-30 yrs, 23 of the respondents have above 40 yrs & 10% of the
respondents have 15-20 yrs. The 69% of the respondents are male and 31% of them are female.
The 48% of the respondents feel good about the company, 27% feel very good, 17% feel
average, 5% feel fair and 3% of them are feel poor.
Agents or dealers and employees should be trained to become more responsive and
courteous toward the customersThe company should focus more on those factors which will
create an awareness about the products offered and will also increase the good will of the
company.
INTRODUCTION
A study on brand preference implies measure of brand loyalty in which a consumer will
choose a particular brand in presence of competing brands, but will accept substitutes if that
brand is not available. We have heard that the customer is always right. We may or may not
agree with that statement but every ought to agree that customers hold a very important places in
our lives. After all, without customers, people who buy our products and services, our businesses
close down and we all pack up to go home. We need to discover brand preference of particular
products and service. Using today’s technology, this can happen by using something as simple as
a feedback card, or by using an online service. Plenty of options exist.
After gathering information, analyze it. Ask tough question and arrive at the tough
answers. Change what is necessary to improve the customer service rating. The more one can
meet customer needs, the better chance for long-term success in their fast-paced, ever-changing
world. Customers form their expectation based on past buying experiences, advice to their
reference group and the promises of the marketer and their competitors. It becomes much easier
for a company to serve a delighted customer. A very satisfied customer will stay with the
company for many years and will bring more business to the firm.
The term marketing concept holds that achieving organizational goals depends on
knowing the needs and wants of target markets and delivering the desired satisfactions. It
proposes that in order to satisfy its organizational objectives, an organization should anticipate
the needs and wants of consumers and satisfy these more effectively than competitors.
Brand - a name, sign, symbol or design, or some combination of these, used to identify a
product and to differentiate it from competitors' products.
Branding has today a central role in marketing. Branding has in theory been focused on
brands of large corporations and consumer goods. The situation of branding in this study differs
from the traditional view. In this case is branding studied from the perspective of a small
company offering services for an industrial market. The key concepts of the study are identity,
image and positioning.
• Brand Equity is the value of a brand built up over a period of time. It is composed of four
components namely Image, Perception, Awareness and Loyalty. However some
researchers say that image and awareness are the main components and the other two get
covered in these two. To calculate brand equity, both the tangible(functional) and
intangible(emotional) attributes are measured. The end result of the measurement is brand
equity.
Brand Preference Selective demand for a company's brand rather than a product; the
degree to which consumers prefer one brand over another.
Kansai Nerolac Paint company Limited joint venture of the Tata Forbes and the Kansai
Paint Co. Ltd., Japan.
COMPANY PROFILE
We embarked our journey in 1920 as Gahagan Paints and Varnish Co. Ltd. at Lower Parel in
Bombay. In 1930, three British companies merged to formulate Lead Industries Group Ltd. In
1933, Lead Industries Group Ltd. acquired entire share capital of Gahagan Paints in 1933 and
thus, Goodlass Wall (India) Ltd. was born.
Subsequently, by 1946, Goodlass Wall (India) Ltd. was known as Goodlass Wall Pvt. Ltd. In
1957, Goodlass Wall Pvt. Ltd. grew popular as Goodlass Nerolac Paints (Pvt.) Ltd. Also, it went
public in the same year and established itself as Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. In 1976, Goodlass
Nerolac Paints Ltd. became a part of the Tata Forbes Group on acquisition of a part of the
foreign shareholdings by Forbes Gokak.In 1983, Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. strengthened itself
by entering in technical collaboration agreements with Kansai Paint Co. Ltd., Japan and Nihon
Tokushu Toryo Co. Ltd., Japan. In 1986, Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. turned into a joint venture
of the Tata Forbes and the Kansai Paint Co. Ltd., with the latter acquiring 36% of its share
capital.In 1999, Kansai Paint Company Ltd., Japan took over the entire stake of Tata Forbes
group and thus GNP became a wholly owned subsidiary of Kansai Paint Company Ltd. In 2006,
on the 11th of July, Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. name has been changed to Kansai Nerolac
Paints Ltd.
Our incessant journey of successes will go on backed by our present human asset of over
2000 professionals and a sales turnover of Rs. 1484 crores. We are esteemed to be a subsidiary
of Kansai Paint Company Limited, which is the largest paint manufacturing company in Japan
and among the top ten coating companies of the world. We are the second largest coating
company in India with a market share of over 20%.
We are the market leader in industrial / automotive segment supplying over 90% of the
OEM requirements. We are the leader in powder coatings.
"The people who make the company are its real assets." At Kansai Nerolac, we stand by
this. The success of Kansai Nerolac has hinged on this philosophy since 1920, and being the
second largest paint company in India is the rightful tribute to its people's commitment and
dedication.
With employee strength of around 2000 spread over the country and an efficient management,
the company provides the conducive work atmosphere to develop and grow. Our team of Ph.D's,
engineers and technicians visit collaborator's plants abroad to update themselves with the latest
techniques.
Board Of Directors
Working together requires that we have a friendly atmosphere based on trust and respect
amongst all of us. At Nerolac we follow an Open Door policy. Any person is free and welcomed
to share good idea, suggestion, doubt, problem about job or work place, or uncertainties about
one’s future in the organization. An open and transparent communication is appreciated.
It is our vision to leverage global technology, for serving our customers with superior
coating systems built on innovative and superior products and world class solutions, to
strengthen our leadership in Industrial coatings and propel for leadership in Architectural
coatings, all to the delight of our stakeholders.
We firmly believe that it is not only the vision of where we wish to go which will form a
cornerstone of all our further growth, but also our conviction to the fact that the values based
proposition has to be ultimate foundation of our business.
To this end we consciously have internalized and been practicing these values in all our
business transactions though human beings: Innovation, Entrepreneurial, Responsive, Simplicity,
Team Orientation.
Social Responsibility
The company continues to make its due contribution to community relief and
development activities and has donated both in cash and kind for the beautification of some
public places in Mumbai and elsewhere. The company continued its activities directly or
indirectly through trusts/agencies in community Development and Social Welfare including
contributions towards national defense, medical help, education, improvement of environment
etc.
TECHNICAL COLLABORATORS
Committed to provide the best in Paints, Nerolac have entered into Technical
Collaboration with two industry leaders known for their technical superiority.
The Associates of Nerolac provide that vital edge to stay ahead of the competition. These
associations were setup with the specialized expertise of the Industry leaders to make Nerolac a
complete Paint Company catering to all the market segments.
ASSOCIATE COMPANIES
What is Paint?
There's more to paint than meets the eye. Physically, paint is a mixture of four important
elements: Pigments, Additives, Binders and Solvents
Additives endow the paint with special properties such as resistance to fungus, rust etc.
Binders hold the paint together and also bind it to the surface being painted, thus
promoting durability.
Types of Finishes
When Surface Coatings (Top coat of Paint) dry, they produce films with varying degree
of sheen. The range extends from Flat or Matt finishes which have no sheen, through increasing
degree of Luster to high gloss finishes.
Based on the reflectance level of the dried film of paint we can classify the finish in to
following four heads:
Matt: It is the kind of finish, which has the lowest level of gloss. When the gloss on a panel
painted with a Matt finish paint is measured in a glossometer at 60-degree angle, the reading is
less than 5.
Egg Shell or Satin: This finish has silk like gloss, explains the name Satin finish. When the
gloss on a panel painted with a Satin finish paint is measured in a glossometer at 60-degree
angle, the reading is 6-20.
Semi-Gloss: This finish has more gloss than a satin finish. When the gloss on a panel painted
with a Semi-Gloss finish paint is measured in a glossometer at 60-degree angle, the reading is
21-70.
Glossy: This is the finish with highest level of gloss. When the gloss on a panel painted with a
Gloss finish paint is measured in a glossometer at 60-degree angle, the reading is more than 70.
Kinds of paints
Decorative paints
Types of Paint
Industrial Paints
Decorative Paints:-
Emulsions
Interior
Lustre
Solvent Based Paint Enamel
Falt Oil
Decorative Paints
Emulsions
Textured
Exterior
Cement
Industrial Paints:-
Automotive Coatings
Industrial paints
Powder coatings
WALL PAINTS
PAINT PRODUC PRODUCT IMAGE PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
T NAME
Nerolac Pearls Lustre finish is a Special Interior
Wall paint that captures the magic glow of pearls
INTERIOR/ Nerolac and the intrinsic resilience of the shell. Thus, this
SOLVENT Pearls paint very rightly stands for "Ornamentation for
BASED Lustre walls". This is a special product for interior use,
PAINTS Finish developed by incorporating selected pacifying
pigments dispersed in a specially formulated
medium.
OBJECTIVES
Primary Objective:-
Secondary Objective:-
brand image
brand equity
SCOPE AND SIGNIFICANCE
Brand preference deals with the aspects that makes the end user (or) customer to select the
particular brand from the paint industry. These are varieties of factors that can influence the
reason for brand preference. Some of the influencer are advertisement (print, voice, media )
painter, builder, engineers. The significance of the study is to identify influencer and its
influence factor. The scope is to find out the various influencer involves in it and provides
solution to the problem.
RESEARCH METHODOLGY
Research design:
Research design is the arrangement of conditions for collection and analysis of data in a
manner that aims to combine relevance to the research design that will be used for the study is
descriptive research design as its explain the fact and state of affair.
The data for this study has been collected from both primary and secondary data sources
Primary data
Primary data will be collect through questionnaire that will ask to customer
Secondary data
The secondary data are those which have already been passed through the statistical
process, the proposed study also make use of secondary source of data collection in the form of
company journals, magazines, records, websites and other relevant sources.
Sample design
SAMPLING SIZE
The study was conducted with the respondents of KANSAI NEROLAC PAINT
LIMITED. It comprises of all the respondents in the concern. The size of the population is 120
respondents survey was conducted in Chennai.
Sampling method
The sampling used is Simple Random sampling which comes under probability so that
every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected.
Sampling unit
The project was concentrated only in the Vadapalani branch NEROLAC KANSAI
PAINT LIMITED, Chennai.
• Rank Correlation
• Anova table
• Chi – square test
• Kolmogorov – Smirnov Test (K-S Test)
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The survey conducted was limited to Chennai. Hence the results attained by the study
may not be universally applicable.
Some of the respondents might have given biased answers which might affect the
findings of the study.
The respondents did not have much time to spend in filling up the questionnaire.
The study was conducted during a short a pan of time and as such the researcher
could concentrate only on available respondents. So convenient sampling technique was
used.
Research is carried out consumers, who are human being they know that they are
observed. So, the customers or respondents start behave artificially when they know that their
attitude, opinions, beliefs and etc., are being studied.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Brand Preference
“Customers buying products are buying utility, function, and performance as much as
image and status” (Terpstra and Sarathy, 1997, p. 375). Actually, Customer merchandise has
implications more than their utilitarian, functional, and commercial significance
(Czikszentmihalyi and Rochberg-Halton, 1981; Ericksen, 1996; Leigh and Gabel, 1992; Levy,
1959; Mick, 1986). Consumers do not “consume products for their material utilities but consume
the symbolic meaning of those products as portrayed in their images” (Elliot, 1997, p. 286).
Therefore, the acquired goods are not only “bundles of attributes that yield particular
benefits” (Holt, 1995, p. 1) but also indications of symbolic meanings to the public. Consumers
are more likely to use brands to express how they are either similar to or different from people of
their in-group (Markus and Kitayama, 1991).
Bhat and Reddy (1998) also reported that brands have practical and emblematic
importance for consumers. The emblematic importance, which is attached to brands, is often
broadcasted via the use and consumption of brands (Gottdeiner, 1985; McCracken, 1986).
Consequently, there seems to be a noteworthy relationship between brand images, consistent
with the emblematic importance of brands, and consumers’ self images (Zinkham and Hong,
1991). Individuals are more likely to buy brands whose personalities intimately match their own
self images (Schiffman and Kanuk, 2000). Similarly, consumers express themselves by selecting
brands whose personalities are recognized to be consistent with their own personalities (Aaker,
1999; Kassarjian, 1971; Sirgy, 1982).
Previous research indicated that self image/self expression affect consumers’ product
preferences and their purchase intentions (Ericksen, 1996; Mehta, 1999). For example, Ericksen
(1996) found a significant relationship between self image and intention to buy an American
automobile (Ford Escort). Based on this finding, it might be inferred that “individuals prefer
brands that have images compatible with their perceptions of self” (Jamal and Goode, 2001, p.
483; Belk, et. al., 1982; Ericksen, 1996; Solomon, 1983; Zinkham and Hong, 1991). Moreover,
this self image consistency strengthen positive attitude toward products and brands (Ericksen,
1996; Sirgy, 1982, 1985, 1991; Sirgy, et. al., 1997). Specifically, “the more similar a consumer’s
self-image is to the brand’s image, the more favorable their evaluations of that brand should be”
(Graeff, 1996, p. 5).
Brand preference has been conceptualized in many ways in the marketing literature. In
some studies, brand preference has been equated with brand loyalty (e.g., Rundle-Thiele and
Mackay 2001). In other studies, it has been evaluated as a precursor to brand loyalty (e.g., Odin
et al. 2001). In this study, we consider brand preference as a precursor to brand loyalty. Brand
preference is typically viewed as an attitude in which the consumer has a predisposition toward
one or more brands. Ben-Akiva et al. (1999) define preferences as “comparative judgments
between entities.” We use this definition as a basis for distinguishing brand preference as a
comparative judgment between a set of brands which leads to a more favorable attitude toward
one or more of the brands.
In contrast, brand loyalty is viewed as a combination of attitude and behavior where a
professed commitment toward a brand is manifested in repeat purchasing of the brand. Jacoby
and Kyner (1973, p. 2) define brand loyalty as: “(1) the biased (i.e., nonrandom), (2) behavioral
response (i.e., purchase), (3) expressed over time, (4) by some decision-making unit, (5) with
respect to one or more alternative brands out of a set of such brands, and (6) is a function of
psychological (decision-making, evaluative) processes.” This widely accepted definition
encompasses behavioral and attitudinal components, stating both must be present since neither is
sufficient on its own. Further, the definition allows for loyalty to multiple brands.
Does brand preference necessarily lead to brand loyalty or repeated purchase of the preferred
brand? Empirical results have shown that the answer is no. Allenby and Lenk (1995) conclude
that “consumer preferences for brands are not nearly as entrenched as might be expected.” Their
research shows that promotional activities such as feature ads, displays, and price cuts can have a
significant effect on whether or not buyers follow through with their preferences. Additional
reasons (other than promotions) why consumers may purchase other brands despite a stated
brand preference include a desire to try and learn more about different brands in the category;
changing needs or situations; variety seeking; and changes in the available alternatives due to
new products or improvements to existing products (Coulter et al. 2003).
Despite the extensive literature on search, only three studies empirically investigate the
brand loyalty-search relationship, and only one study could be found that addresses the brand
preference-search relationship. For brand loyalty, only one of the studies finds the hypothesized
negative, significant relationship between brand loyalty and search. Bennett and Mandell (1969)
find this relationship between loyalty and search for the product category automobiles (p≤ 0.05),
using a behavior-based measure of loyalty (number of prior purchases of a brand and the
sequence of prior purchases). In contrast, Kiel and Layton (1981) do not find a significant
relationship between a similar behavioral measure of loyalty (repurchase of the same brand) and
search time or search activity for the same category of cars. In another context, Jacoby et al.
(1978) evaluated the brand loyalty-search relationship for breakfast cereals. In this study, both an
attitude-based and a purchase-based measure of brand loyalty were used. Their findings show no
540 relationship between the purchase-based measure of brand loyalty and search (p=0.59) and
only a questionable relationship between the attitudinal measure of brand loyalty (p = 0.06). As
such, the literature provides at best weak support for the hypothesis that brand loyalty reduces
search. Despite this limited support, the marketing literature concludes that brand loyalty
decreases search effort (e.g., Gwinner et al. 1998). In fact, Sheth and Parvatiyar (1995, p. 256)
claim that “the fundamental axiom of relationship marketing is, or should be, that consumers like
to reduce choices by engaging in an ongoing loyalty relationship with marketers.”
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Table No: 1
1 15-20 yrs 12 10
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 35.83% of the respondents have
the age group of 30-40 yrs, 31.67% of the respondents have age group of
20-30 yrs,22.5 of the respondents have above 40 yrs & 10% of the
respondents have 15-20 yrs.
Chart No: 1
Table No: 2
2 Female 17 14.17
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 69.17% of the respondents are male and 30.83% of
them are female.
Chart No: 2
Table No: 3
2 UG 38 31.67
3 PG 21 17.5
4 Professional 18 15
5 Others 17 14.17
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 31.67% of the respondents have the UG degree,
21.67%of the respondents have below 12th ,17.5% of the respondents have PG degree,15% of the
respondents have Professional degree and 14.17% have other qualification.
Chart No: 3
Table No: 4
1 Students 14 11.67
2 Government 17 14.67
employee
3 Private 45 37.5
4 Business 26 21.67
5 Others 18 15
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 37.5% of the respondents are the Private employees,
21.67%of the respondents are Business people,15% of the respondents are Other
occupation,14.67% of the respondents are Government Employees and 11.67% are Students.
Chart No: 4
Table No: 5
1 Below 2 lakhs 36 30
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 47.5% of the respondents have the income group of 2-
4 lakhs, 30% have income group of below 2 lakhs and 22.5% have income group of above 4
lakhs.
Chart No: 5
Table No: 6
1 Below 3 18 15
2 4 23 19.16
3 5 41 34.17
4 Above 5 38 31.67
Total 120 100
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 34.17% of the respondents have the family members
as below 3, 31.67% have above 5 of family members, 19.16% have 4 as family members and
15% have below 3 of family members.
Chart No: 6
5 Others 20 16.67
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 31.66% of the respondents said financial security,
19.17% said children’s future, 18.33% said saving & investment, 16.67% said retirement safety
and 14.17% said tax benefit.
Chart No: 7
Table No: 8
3 Berger 22 18.33
4 ICI 20 16.67
5 Others 8 6.67
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 35.83% of the respondents choose Asian paints, 22.5%
choose Kansai Nerolac, 18.33% choose Berger, 16.67% choose ICI and 6.67% choose others.
Chart No: 8
Table No: 9
3 Berger 18 15
4 ICI 12 10
5 Others 16 13.33
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 35% of the respondents are selected Asian paints,
26.67% are selected Kansai nerolac, 15% are selected Berger, 13.33% are selected others and
10% are selected ICI.
Chart No: 9
1 YES 87 72.5
2 NO 33 27.5
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 72.5% of the respondents using paints for their
building and 27.5% of them using other decors for their buildings.
Chart No: 10
Table No: 11
2 Economic 22 18.33
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 34.17% of the respondents influenced to take through
very attractive, 24.17% take through variety of product, 18.33% take through economic, 14.16%
take through other resons and 9.17% take through maximum life of product.
Chart No: 11
Table No: 12
Table Showing customer preference in Decorative Paint of kansai nerolac paints
1 Wall- Interior 42 35
paint
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 35% of the respondents prefer wall-interior paint,
26.67% prefer wall exterior, 20.83% prefer woods paint and 17.5% prefer metals paint.
Chart No: 12
Table No: 13
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 38.33% of the respondents prefer Nerolac Pearls
Lustre Finish, 21.67% prefer Nerolac Beauty Silky Smooth, 12.5% prefer Nerolac Synthetic
Enamel, 11.67% prefer Nerolac Beauty Premium Acrylic Distemper, 9.17% prefer Nerolac
Beauty Premium Acrylic Distemper, 4.17% prefer Nerolac Impression Metallic and 2.5% prefer
Nerolac Disney Emulsion .
Chart No: 13
Table No: 14
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 29.17% of the respondents prefer Nerolac Everlast Self
Clining, 17.5% prefer Nerolac Nerocem with Titanium+, 35% Nerolac Suraksha Plastic and
18.33% prefer Nerolac Impression Excel Anti Peel Acrylic.
Chart No: 14
1 Radio 19 15.83
2 Newspaper/Magazine 26 21.67
3 TV/Internet 10 8.33
4 Friends/references 21 17.5
5 Agents 44 36.67
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 36.67% of the respondents preference Agents, 21.67%
preference Newspaper, 17.5% preference Friends/references, 15.83% preference Radio and
8.33% preference TV/Internet.
Chart No: 15
Table No: 16
3 Reputation 23 19.17
5 Others 42 35
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 35% of the respondents are attracted by money back
guarantee, 19.17% are attracted by Variety of products&Reputation,17.5% are attracted by low
premium and 9.16% are attracted by easy access to the agents.
Chart No: 16
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 34.17% of the respondents influenced to take
through Decorative paint (wall) - Interior, 24.17% take through Decorative paint (wall) -
Exterior, 18.33% take throughDecorative paint (Metal), 14.16% take through High Performance
coating paint and 9.17% take through Decorative paint (wood).
Chart No: 17
Table No:18
Table showing customer’s satisfaction level in different attributes of Kansai Nerolac Paints
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 32.67% of the respondents satisfied in Wall paint
-Interior,31.67% satisfied in Wall paint - Exterior,19.36% satisfied in Metal Paint -
Interior,11.5% satisfied in Wood Paint and 4.8% are satisfied in High Performance coating
paint.
Chart No: 18
Chart showing customer’s satisfaction level in different attributes of Kansai Nerolac Paints
(Source: Table No:18)
Table No: 19
2 6month-1 yr 28 23.33
4 3-5 yrs 30 25
5 Above 5 yrs 18 15
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 27.5% of the respondents are using paint for 1yr-3
yrs, 25% are having 3-5yrs, 23.33% are having 6month-1yr, 15% are having above 5 yrs and
9.17% are having less than 6 month.
Chart No: 19
Table No: 20
1 Competitive 59 49.17
2 Less competitive 38 31.67
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 49.17% of the respondents are feel competitive,
31.67% are feel less competitive and 19.16% are feel not at all.
Chart No: 20
Table No: 21
1 YES 78 65
2 NO 42 35
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 65% of the respondents said there is value of money
and 35% said there is no value of money .
Chart No: 21
Table No: 22
1 Definitely 24 20
3 Probably 46 38.33
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 38.33% of the respondents are probably like to buy in
future, 29.17% are most probably to buy, 20% are definitely to buy, 8.33% are not probably to
buy and 4.17% are definitely not probably to buy.
Chart No: 22
Table No: 23
2 Satisfied 55 38.33
4 Dissatisfied 12 8.33
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 38.33% of the respondents are Satisfied with the
dealers, 31.67% are Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, 18.33% are Highly Satisfied, 8.33% are
Dissatisfied and 3.34% are Highly Dissatisfied.
Chart No: 23
Table No: 24
1 YES 98 81.67
2 NO 22 18.33
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 81.67% of the respondents are recommended the paint
to others and 18.33% are not recommended.
Chart No: 24
Table No: 25
2 4. Satisfied 41 34.17
3 3.Neither satisfied nor 30 25
dissatisfied
4 2. Dissatisfied 18 15
(Source: Questionnaire)
Interpretation:
From the above table it shows that 34.17% of the respondents are satisfied with rank 4,
25% are neither Satisfied nor dissatisfied with rank 3, 19.17% are Highly Satisfied with rank 5 ,
15% are Dissatisfied with rank 2 and 6.66% are Highly Dissatisfied with rank 1.
Chart No: 25
To test know the relationships between male and female opinion about advertising media has
greater impact on choose the paint company.
Radio 10 8
News paper 8 7
T.V/Internet 6 4
Friends/References 13 13
Agents 46 5
Solution:
3 4 -1 1
2 3 -1 1
1 1 0 0
4 5 -1 1
5 2 3 9
∑ D2 12
n=5
Rank Correlation
r=0.4
Inference
Calculation value of r > 0 , so the relationships between male and female opinion is
positive about. advertising media has greater impact on choose the paint company.
It is a simple nonparametric test for testing whether there is a significant difference between on
observed frequency and a theoretical frequency. This is also known as K-S test.
(HO): There is no significant different between satisfied with the paint & opinion about kansai
Nerolac Paint
(H1): There is significant different between satisfied with the paint & opinion about kansai
Nerolac Paint
Sol :
22/120 21/120
22 22 21 21 0.008
= 0.183 = 0.175
77/120 78/120
55 77 57 78 0.008
= 0.642 = 0.65
102/120 105/120
25 102 27 105 0.025
= 0.85 = 0.875
114/120 117/120
12 114 12 117 0.025
= 0.95 = 0.975
120/120 120/120
6 120 3 120 0
=1 =1
Result:
In the above calculation, it is found that there is no different between satisfied with the
paint & opinion about kansai Nerolac Paint.
ANOVA Table
Alternative hypothesis
There is significant relationship between over all satisfication level with different product
provided by the company.
Solution
N = Row x column = 25
T (Total Sum) = ∑ (x1)+ ∑ (x2)+ ∑ (x3) +∑ (x4)+ ∑ (x5) = 600
Table value: Variance within factor tabulate value F=5.77 [for degree v1=4, v2=24]
Inference
Result:
There is significant relationship between satisfaction levels of different attributes in
Kansai Nerolac Paints.
To test whether there is a significance difference between gender and respondents using
paint in other paint companies.
Null hypothesis
There is no significant relationship between gender and respondents using paint in other
paint companies.
Alternative hypothesis
There is significant relationship between gender and respondents using paint in other
paint companies.
Male 50 20 70
Female 37 13 50
Total 87 33 120(N)
Solution:
(O) (E)
=(r-1) (c-1)
= (2-1)*(2-1) =1*1=1
Inference
Result:
There is no significant relationship between gender and respondents using paint in other
paint companies.
FINDINGS
In Kansai nerolac Paint, 36% of the respondents have the age group of 30-40 yrs, 31% of
the respondents have age group of 20-30 yrs, 23 of the respondents have above 40 yrs &
10% of the respondents have 15-20 yrs.
The 69% of the respondents are male and 31% of them are female.
The 32% of the respondent have education qualification of UG, 22% have below 12th,
17% have PG, 15% are Professional and 14% have other education qualification.
The 48% of the respondents have the income group of 2-4 lakhs, 30% have income group
of below 2 lakhs and 22% have income group of above 4 lakhs.
The 32% of respondent are influenced due to it gives beautiful decors to house,19% are
to provide safety from climate,18% are to attract public, 17% are to other reason and 14%
are to show royalty.
The 36% of the respondents choose Kansai Nerolac Paints, 22% choose Asian Paint, 18%
choose Berger, 17% choose ICI and 7% choose other Paints.
The 34% of the respondents influenced to take through Nerolac Wall Paint Interior, 24%
take through Nerolac Wall Paint Exterior, 18% take through Wood Paints, 15% take
through High Performance Painting and 9% take throughwood Paints.
The 72% of the respondents holding other paint and 28% of them holding Kansai Nerolac
Paints.
The 34% respondent prefer for variety of product,24% for very attractive, ,18% for
economic, 14% for other reason and 9% for maximum life of product.
The 28% of the respondents are using Kansai Nerolac Paints for 1 yr-3 yrs, 25% are
using 3-5yrs, 23% are using 6month-1yr, 15% are using above 5 yrs and 9% are using
less than 6 month.
The 49% of the respondents are feel competitive, 32% are feel less competitive and 19%
are feel not at all.
The 38% of the respondents are satisfied with Kansai Nerolac paint, 32% are Neither
Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied, 18% are Highly Satisfied, 8% are Dissatisfied and 4% are
Highly Dissatisfied.
The 82% of the respondents are recommended the policy to others and 18% are not
recommended.
The 48% of the respondents feel good about the company, 27% feel very good, 17% feel
average, 5% feel fair and 3% of them are feel poor.
SUGGESTIONS
The company should be in advance in sending information about the new paint and
others information to the customer.
The company should come with liability covers embracing all sorts of claims.
The company should restructure the premium rates and make sure that the premium rate
reflects current market conditions.
Agents or dealers and employees should be trained to become more responsive and
courteous toward the customers.
The company should focus more on those factors which will create an awareness about
the products offered and will also increase the good will of the company.
The company should provide free consulting centre for clearing the consumers doubt
regarding their Paints.
The company should try to retain all his present customer by announcing some attractive
package to regular customer.
The company should show more focus on order capturing and processing.
The company should come up with innovative plan to promote online order management
with home delivery.
Brand preference is to identify why the customer of the company prefers more Kansai
Nerolac Paints compare to other paint companies and identify the level of satisfaction among the
customer of the existing services. The success of the company directly or indirectly depends on
their customers, as they are the backbone of the company. Today, the company has expanded
tremendously by issuing traditional and non-traditional plans aiming at high level of customers.
The company can take steps to conduct more promotion programs on paint and promotion to
increase the customer needs, perception, requirements and satisfaction. From this, company sales
will also increase.
A STUDY ON THE BRAND PREFERENCE TOWARDS OTHERS PAINTS COMPANY
WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO KANSAI NEROLAC PAINT LIMITED
QUESTIONNAIRE
Personal details
1.Name
2. Age
(a) 15-20
(b) 20-30
(c) 30-40
Socio-economic factor
4. Educational qualification
(a) Below 12th
(b) UG
(C) PG
(d) Professional
(e) Others
5. Occupation
(a) Students
(b) Government employee
(c) Private
(d) Business
(e) Others
(b) 2 -4lakhs
(a) Below 3
(b) 4
(c) 5
(d) Above 5
Customer Opinion
3. If you have purchased or planning to purchase paint, what would be your choice ?
(a) Kansai Nerolac
(b) Asian paints
(c) Berger
(d) ICI
(e) Others
5. If yes, mention from which paint company you have purchased the paint?
(a) Kansai Nerolac
(b) Asian paints
(c) Berger
(d) ICI
(e) Shalimar
(f) Nippon
(g) Sharlon
(i) Others specify ---------------
7. What type of paint do you prefer in Decorative Paint of kansai nerolac paints?
11. Which advertising media has greater impact on you to choose the paint company?
(a)Radio
(b)Newspaper
(c)TV
(d)Friends
(e)Agents
14. What do you feel about the paint price of kansai nerolac paint limited?
(a) Competitive
(b) Less competitive
(c) Not at all competitive
16.Rank the factors that influenced you to take the paint from kansai Nerolac?
D Decorative Paints(Wood)
17. Rank your satisfaction level on the following attributes of Kansai Nerolac paint?
Level of Satisfaction
S.No. Attributes VS S AVG DS VDS
C Woods paint
D Metals paint
18. How likely are you to buy kansai nerolac paint in future?
(a) Definitely
(b) Most probably
(c) Probably
(d) Probably not
(e) Definitely not
21. Give your overall rank for the Kansai Nerolac paints (1-5 highest)?
(b) 4. Satisfied
(d) 2. Dissatisfied
Philip Kotler, Marketing Management, Prentice- Hall India Publication, Sixth Edition.
Coopes Schindler, Business Research Methods, Tata Mc Grawhill Publication, Sixth Edition.
Websites Visited
www.Paint.com
www.google .co.in
www.wikipedia.com