89454336.xlsx.

ms_office

Potential Analysis Report VDA 6.3-2010 Assessment of Quality Capability

Organsiation:
Supplier No: Location:

Client
Reason for Contract:

Date: Contract No:

Pro. Nr.

Project, Product, Process

Assessed

Findings / Requirements
Process description

Green Yellow Red

Fully approved supplier Controlled supplier Barred supplier

A contract can be issued for the above project, product A contract can be issued conditionally for the above project, product A contract can not be issued for the above project, product

Checks on information provided by supplier

Note: the maximum number of questions not assessed ist limited to 3

Audit history / Certificates

Audit basis Date Carried out Result

Highlights

Areas for Improvement

Participants:

Distri-bute to:

Further actions:

Timing for improvement plan:

For actions see 'Improvement program' and/or 'Immediate actions'

Lead Auditor

Co-Auditor

signed for organisation

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 1 von 9

89454336.xlsx.ms_office

Explanations
Supplier: Client:
Date:

Explanations

The improvement program was discussed in the final meeting on site and handed over as a draft.. The audited Organisaion is asked to define sustainable corrective actions for the identified weak points and to implement them rapidly. We point out that within the audit the processes only can be checked randomly. Other weak points and / or potentials for imprevement may be possible. It is the responsibility of the audited parties to expand the investigation and necessary measures to similar areas / issues.

Participants:

Auditor:

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 2 von 9

89454336.xlsx.ms_office

Potential Analysis (P1) as excerpt from VDA 6.3 questionary

Supplier:
VDA

Client:
Questions Potential Analysis P1 Assess-ment Remarks

6.3*

Project management
Is the project organisation (project management) establshed and are tasks and authorities specified for the project management and teammembers? Are the necessary resources planned and available for the development of the project and are changes highlighted? Is there a project plan and has this been agreed with the customer? Is change management within the project ensured by the project manager? Is change management within the project ensured by the project manager? Is there a quality plan in the project ? Is this implemented and regularly monitored for compliance? Is an escalation process established and is this controlled effectively?

2.1

1.1

2.2*

1.2

2.3

1.3

2.4

1.4

2.5*

1.5

2.6

1.6

2.7*

1.7

Planning the product & process development

3.1 2.1
Are the product-specific and process-specific requirements set out? Is manufacturing feasibility assessed on the basis of the requirements established for the product and process, on a cross-functional level?

3.2*

2.2

Carrying out the product & process development

4.1 3.1
Are the Design FMEA / Process FMEA drawn up and up-dated in the course of the project and are corrective actions specified? Are the necessary demonstrations of suitability and releases available for the relevant phases of the project, based on the requirements? Is the transfer of the project to full production secure in terms of the product launch?

4.5*

3.2

4.9

3.3

Supplier management
5.1* 4.1
Are only approved and quality-capable suppliers appointed? Are the customer's requirements taken into account in the supply chain? Are the necessary approvals available for out-sourced products and services? Is the agreed quality of out-sourced products and services guaranteed? Are incoming goods stored in the appropriate manner?

5.2

4.2

5.4*

4.3

5.5*

4.4

5.6

4.5

Process analysis / Production

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 3 von 9

89454336.xlsx.ms_office

VDA

Questions Potential Analysis P1

6.3* What goes into the process? Process input 6.1.1* 5.1.1
Has the transfer of the project from development to full production been completed? Are upstream materials stored in the appropriate manner and do the transport methods / packing systems take account of the special characteristics of upstream materials?

Assess-ment

Remarks

6.1.3

5.1.2 Work content / process sequence (are all production processes controlled ?)
Based on the production control plan, are all the relevant data fully listed in the production and test / inspection documentation?

6.2.1* 5.2.1
Can the customer's product-specific quality requirements be achieved with the production facilities? Are significant characteristics controlled in production? Are scrap, rework and setting parts, as well as residual in-house quantities properly separated and identified? Is the flow of materials and components secured against mix-ups / incorrect identification?

6.2.3* 5.2.2

57

6.2.4* 5.2.3

6.2.5

5.2.4

6.2.6

5.2.5

Process support / personnel resources 6.3.2* 5.3.1

Are the operators able to carry out their allotted tasks and are their qualifications kept up-to-date?

Material resources 6.4.1 5.4.1

Are the maintenance and overhaul of machines / facilities controlled on a preventive basis? Can the quality requirements be monitored effectively with the measurement, checking and inspection equipment used? Are the work-areas and test / inspection stations suitable for requirements? Are tools, equipment and test / inspection devices stored appropriately?

6.4.2* 5.4.2

6.4.3

5.4.3

6.4.4

5.4.4

Process effectiveness level (Effectivity, Efficency and avoiding waste integrated)

Are targets set for product and process?

6.5.1

5.5.1
If deviations from product and process requirements occur, are the causes analysed and corrective actions checked for effectiveness?

6.5.3* 5.5.2
Are processes and products audited regularly?

6.5.4* 5.5.3 What should the process produce ? (process result / output) 6.6.1* 5.6.1
Are the customer's requirements satisfied in terms of product and process?

Customer support / customer satisfaction / service

7.1* 6.1
Are the customer's requirements satisfied in terms of QM system, product (on delivery) and process?

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 4 von 9

89454336.xlsx.ms_office

VDA

Questions Potential Analysis P1

6.3*
Is the supply of components secure?

Assess-ment

Remarks

7.3*

6.2

Numbers of classifications / assessments

Nicht bewertete Fragen sind zu begrnden. Die Vergleichbarkeit der Ergebnisse bzw. die gegenseitige Anerkennung ist damit nicht mehr gegeben. Number of questions answerded

[green] requirements fullfilled [yellow] requirements partly fullfilled [red] requirments not fullfilled

too less assessments max. 7 questions yellow no question red max. 14 questions yellow no questions red more than 14 questions yellow 1 and more questions red

Plausibilittsprfung

Fully approved supplier Controlled supplier

award / nomination governed by defined conditions

Barred supplier
award / nomitation is not possible
Overall Classification

Note: the maximum number of questions not assessed ist limited to 3

[Green] Requirents are fulfilled [Yellow] Requirements are partly fulfilled [Red] Requirements are not fulfilled
Notes / Remarks to the classification:

The question can be answered in full with yes, there is no potential risk. The question can not be fully answerde with yes, the target (process / product) can be only reached with additionally actions / measures. The question has to be answerded with no., the target (product / process) is not reached, there is a potenial risk for rejects (Ausfalls).

Rot Gelb Grn

Date / signature auditor

Date / sign for organization

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 5 von 9

89454336.xlsx.ms_office

Improvement program VDA 6.3-2010

Supplier:
To be completed by the auditor
Quest Nr.

Date: Client:
To be completed by the audited organisation

Pos.

Weaknesses, recommended actions, findings

Actions and cause analysis by the organisation

Timing

Responsib.

Effectiveness

Project management
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

Planning the product & process development

2.1 2.2

Carrying out the product & process development

3.1 3.2 3.3

Supplier management
4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 6 von 9

89454336.xlsx.ms_office

To be completed by the auditor

Quest Nr.

To be completed by the audited organisation

Pos.

Weaknesses, recommended actions, findings

Actions and cause analysis by the organisation

Timing

Responsib.

Effectiveness

Process analysis / Production What goes into the process? Process input
5.1.1 5.1.2

Work content / process sequence (are all production processes controlled ?)

5.2.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 5.2.4 5.2.5

Process support / personnel resources

5.3.1

Material resources
5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 5.4.4

Process effectiveness level (Effectivity, Efficency and avoiding waste integrated)

5.5.1 5.5.2 5.5.3

What should the process produce ? (process result / output)

5.6.1

Customer support / customer satisfaction / service

6.1 6.2

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 7 von 9

89454336.xlsx.ms_office

Time Schedule Applicant / Supplier for Upgrade Qualification

Supplier: Contract No: Pos. Activites Date: Expected Schedule Date Confirmed Status

1. Improvement program received 2. Timing and detailling of the improvement program 3. Realization of improvement program and proof of effectivity 4.

14 days after 1. 12 weeks after award 12 weeks before SOP

Only at stage 'Green' or 'Yellow', if award is made: Selfassessment according to VDA 6.3

Explanations
Implementation of measures: The activities must be realized immedeatelly. For large imprvement programs the realization can be subdivided in several realization phases. Selfassessment: to assess seriously the selfassessment, we ask for information about the audit timing (man days) and the qualitfication of the auditors used. In our opinion the audit timing equates a timing of a certification audit. After receiving and verifying the audit documents we will, if the result is classified as "A", agree our next audit timing. If trhe result is classified as "B" we ask for realistic timing you will achieve an "A" classification. We expect then the ontime sending of the audit report of the internals follow up audit, without any specific request from us. Agreement of upgrade qualification: Controlled suppliers / tenders commit themselves, after been awarded, to coorperate with an approved consulting company by accpeting the upgrade qualification agreement. Costs will be carried by the supplier. Auditor: Signature Supplier/ Tender:

Erstellt: Rita Demmeler-Wirth

Version/Stand: 2.3/14.03.2012

Seite 8 von 9

Disclaimer:
This template is provided free of charge by ORGAImprove to be used by interested parties. The use of this template is within the responsibility of the user and at users risk only! ORGAimprove will not take any responsiblity or liability for any errors e.g. in calculations / evaluations! There is no right of support or delivery of updates by ORGAimprove! Please note: The exact requirements for each question are provided in the 'Red Book' VDA 6.3!

Status of Changes
Version Nr 1.0 Comment Set up Tool Failure questions (5.2 and 7.3) solved, include column with reference to numbers in '8.1 Overview questionaire' Correction of assessing achievement (number of questions assessed red / yellow) Verbesserungen bei der Formatierung, automatisierte Berechnung Verknpfung Anmerkungen aus Potentialanalyse mit Verbesserungsprogramm Einfgen Time Schedule Qualifikation Analysis sheet, adjusting calculation (>14 yellow is red not =14 is red), and 3 questions empty is still ok Corrction entry 6.3.1 --> 6.3.2* (question was ok, only number to be corrected) Date Name 11/1/2010 R. Demmeler-Wirth

1.1

12/30/2010 R. Demmeler-Wirth

1.2

2/10/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth

2.0

5/30/2011 R. Demmeler-Wirth

2.1 2.2

2/20/2012 R. Demmeler-Wirth 2/28/2012 R. Demmeler-Wirth

2.3

Fragebogen Nummern zum Verweis VDA richtig gestellt. (4.1,4.3,4.9, (5.4,5.6,5.7, 6.3.2, ) Fragen waren richtig! Verbesserungsprogramm, fehlenden Link zugefgt

3/14/2012 R. Demmeler-Wirth