Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Graph 9

    Uploaded by

    singhishan
    4 views1 page
    This graph compares the voltage gain of different types of low pass filters as a function of frequency on a logarithmic scale. It shows that Bessel filters have the flattest response, followed by Butterworth then Chebyshev filters, while higher Q filters roll off more sharply.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Graph9

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This graph compares the voltage gain of different types of low pass filters as a function of frequency on a logarithmic scale. It shows that Bessel filters have the flattest response, followed by Butterworth then Chebyshev filters, while higher Q filters roll off more sharply.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Graph 9

    Uploaded by

    singhishan
    This graph compares the voltage gain of different types of low pass filters as a function of frequency on a logarithmic scale. It shows that Bessel filters have the flattest response, followed by Butterworth then Chebyshev filters, while higher Q filters roll off more sharply.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    0.

    Low pass filters


    0.6
    0.4

    LOG(Voltage gain)

    0.2
    0.0
    -0.2
    -0.4

    Bessel Q=0.577
    Butterworth Q=0.707
    Chebyshev Q=1
    Q=5

    -0.6
    -0.8
    -1.0
    -1.2
    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    Log(frequency)

    2.5

    3.0

    You might also like