PROJECT CONEL ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT

Student: John Bofarull Guix, 396047 jgb.2009@hotmail.co.uk 396047@student.conel.ac.uk

ANNEX 3: SOME TABLES TABLE 10 areas calculated 1cm:20m from [ref 20]
A0 A1 100 70 9825 7319 A2 150 105 14737 10978 A3 450 315 44210.3 32933.5 A4 1000 700 98245 73186 A5 250 175 24561.3 18296.4 A6 1150 805 112982 84163.5 A7 400 280 39298 29274 A8 500 350 49122.5 36592.8 A9 500 350 49122.5 36592.8 A10 350 245 34386 25615 A11 900 630 88420.5 65867.08
12700 m2

roof area coeff empty roof W/m2 PV panel combined coeffs area/panel measurement: kWh/m2/y kWh/year kWh/day W/m2 generated W/m2 PV panel combined coeffs area/panel measurement: kWh/m2/y kWh/year kWh/day W/m2 generated dust T converter 0.9 0.89 0.93 0.7449 0.5215
John Bofarull Guix

6950 0.7 140.35 0.74493 0.997 144.31 704233 1929.4 16.52 4865 682803 508640

8890 m2

4880

70

105

316

702

176

807

281

351

351

246

632

total panels type 1:

10102 27.68 16.48 15153 41.51 16.47 45602 124.94 16.53 101306 277.55 16.52 25398.6 69.59 16.57 116458 319.06 16.51 40551 111.1 16.53 50652.8 138.77 16.52 50652.8 138.77 16.52 35500 97.26 16.54

8917
91203.92 249.87 16.53 3525.5 kWh/day

146896 W

126.76 0.66483 1.065 144.31

616687 409992

8873 5899

13310 8849

39929.4 26546.3

88732 58992

22183 14747.9

102042 67840.5

35493 23597

44366 29495.9

44366 29495.9

31056 20647

79858.8 53092.53

4568

66

99

296

657

164

756

263

329

329

230

592

total panels type 2:

659208 1806.1 16.47 9524 26.09 16.47 14287 39.14 16.47 42715.8 117.03 16.47 94812 259.76 16.47 23666.8 64.84 16.47 109098 298.9 16.47 37954 104 16.47 47478 130.08 16.47 47478 130.08 16.47 33191 90.94 16.47

8349
85431.52 234.06 16.47 3300.95 kWh/day

137540 W

CONEL Buildings Energy Efficiency ANNEX 3 TABLES 10, 25, 32, 53.1 and 53.2

1/5

TABLE 25: GRID CONNECTED PV PANELS TREND

John Bofarull Guix

CONEL Buildings Energy Efficiency ANNEX 3 TABLES 10, 25, 32, 53.1 and 53.2

2/5

TABLE 32: SIMPLIFIED COMPARATIVE TABLE OF CONVENTIONAL and ALTERNATIVE POWER SOURCES and ADDITIONAL COUNTERMEASURES
ENERGY SOURCE

advantages
1.Already here and working. 2. It supplies requested power, at any time.

drawbacks
1.price climbing up. 2.Factual Cartel keeping prices up. 3. Heavily taxed. 4. CO2 emissions. 5. Shortage

conventional electrical supply

petrol

mature technology

high taxes, shortage may happen sooner than expected, few sources running cartels, more expensive than fossil gas and H2 CO2 emissions, Importing it, if no FC CO2 emissions high 90% cost is drainage, but cannot disconnect drainage without disconnecting intake too

y/n (for CONEL) Y, because no alternative currently. Smart target would be to manage 15% reduction for instance 5 years after alternative power system installation N, CONEL no fuel storage, CO2 emission.
Y, Cheap alternative to Petrol

reason
CONEL has to comply with buildings energy efficiency, but staff and student comfort is a must.

Hospitals and some telephone exchange stations, and farms for instance have power back up. But it is not the case for CONEL. Expensive.

gas supply water supply

topping up current supply. vital supply, no alternative to CONEL

COMPULSORY Yes, if using water as FC propellant through clean electrolysis, such water used as fuel would not be removed through drainage so monitoring inlet and drainage, perhaps CONEL would manage to reduce water supplier bill (10% in,90% out). AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVES: for sake of space many obvious reasons otherwise the table would be 3 times longer. clean, no need for fuel bound to Sun and seasons, PV panels have Y, start ASAP no battery, grid plugged - LV roof to top floor PV panels
storage, no whirling parts

Solar Thermal Wind fossil fuel based cogeneration micro CHP Biofuel
no CO2, off shore is ok market inertia, available

Reformation Burning waste Nuclear Coal ADDITIONAL COUNTERMEASURES: centralized control, cheap, changing IT policies easy, straight saving reduce thermal demand reduce vampires improve insulation sure way to rating A improve materials

gas pipes supply no need for storage. If SOCF = clean energy Methanol is good source for FC with reformation included in SOFC uCHP already working no fuel shortage, no CO2 UK source, reliable

to be replaced, keep eye on meter to make sure feed back is reimbursed. needs maintenance, spare parts, needs commitment to do things right limited energy production, limited size heavily taxed, shortage, no fuel storage, no room for large cogeneration equipment, no large team maintenance available. SOFC not yet licensed in UK (energy trust)

Y, start ASAP N N, CONEL is a college not a generation plant

classrooms; win-win low risk investment. Publish feed back reading online along with standard log best option. again, solar does not cut off conventional supply but it helps reduce it, and it may help to produce clean H2. CONEL may have a portable diesel generation system, or even keep a small group just in case, but as far as I have been told, condition to this project is NO FOSSIL FUEL STORAGE at CONEL. there are microCHP like conventional boilers, burning gas or diesel/gasoline. microCHP SOCF is the one CONEL should pay attention to. BUT of ACADEMIC INTEREST start with natural reformation and end up on H2 incompatible with a learning centre no skills, no security, against urban regulations, no CONEL is not a combined cycle station, incompatible

Y conditional to SOFC technology N, CONEL does not have large ponds Y, it's the way out fossil fuels N N N Y Y Y don't know without IR check don't know

need pond, dedicated staff, needed storage and maintenance needs FC, gas, installation, will to improve it smells, it would make students complain highly skilled staff and expensive, security fossil, requires storage, skills, space, tools administrator rights required, bureaucracy, comfort level reduced, possible complaints, some students learning may slow down installation expensive, impractical or impossible

John Bofarull Guix

CONEL Buildings Energy Efficiency ANNEX 3 TABLES 10, 25, 32, 53.1 and 53.2

3/5

TABLE 53.1 FROM FUEL CELLS HANDBOOK DOE [h2.DOE]

John Bofarull Guix

CONEL Buildings Energy Efficiency ANNEX 3 TABLES 10, 25, 32, 53.1 and 53.2

4/5

TABLE 53.2 WELL2WHEEL GAS REFORMATION TABLE [CUTE]

John Bofarull Guix

CONEL Buildings Energy Efficiency ANNEX 3 TABLES 10, 25, 32, 53.1 and 53.2

5/5