Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Peer assessment grading rubric checklist feedback

    Uploaded by

    Irena Mestrovic Stajduhar
    60 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric for peer assessment grading that evaluates submissions based on completion of checklists and open-ended questions, the provision of specific and constructive feedback, and the degree to which that feedback is informative, substantive, and suggests improvements. Feedback is considered inadequate if it provides no details, fails to explain problems, and gives no suggestions for improvement. Good feedback provides some details and ideas but does not discuss them in depth. Excellent feedback thoroughly discusses supporting details, ideas, and suggestions for improvement.

    Original Description:

    grading rubric

    Original Title

    Peer Assessment Grading Rubric

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides a rubric for peer assessment grading that evaluates submissions based on completion of checklists and open-ended questions, the provision of specific and constructive feedback, and the degree to which that feedback is informative, substantive, and suggests improvements. Feedback is considered inadequate if it provides no details, fails to explain problems, and gives no suggestions for improvement. Good feedback provides some details and ideas but does not discuss them in depth. Excellent feedback thoroughly discusses supporting details, ideas, and suggestions for improvement.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    60 views1 page

    Peer assessment grading rubric checklist feedback

    Uploaded by

    Irena Mestrovic Stajduhar
    The document provides a rubric for peer assessment grading that evaluates submissions based on completion of checklists and open-ended questions, the provision of specific and constructive feedback, and the degree to which that feedback is informative, substantive, and suggests improvements. Feedback is considered inadequate if it provides no details, fails to explain problems, and gives no suggestions for improvement. Good feedback provides some details and ideas but does not discuss them in depth. Excellent feedback thoroughly discusses supporting details, ideas, and suggestions for improvement.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Peer assessment grading rubric COMPLETION checklists completed open-ended questions answered FEEDBACK specific (provides details and

    examples) NO (0) PARTIALLY (1) YES (2)

    INADEQUATE Provides no supporting details.

    informative (explains why the behavior is a problem)

    substantive (comments are meaningful)

    constructive (suggests how the work could be improved)

    Fails to explain the problem. Restates the facts, but does not say why it should be considered a problem. Ideas are not clear or there are too many comments listed, but not discussed. No suggestions for improvement are given.

    GOOD Some supporting details are mentioned, but not discussed. Provides certain insight, but does not develop ideas further.

    EXCELLENT Supporting details are appropriately discussed. Thoroughly explores the ideas mentioned.

    Provides certain Ideas are clear insight, but does and discussed in not develop ideas depth. sufficiently. Some ideas for improvement are mentioned, but not discussed. Ideas for improvement are appropriately discussed.

    You might also like