Criteria BC Peer Feedback Name(person giving feedback): Nina

Check and comment as appropriate

B.i
Research question yes no
All variables included in the RQ yes no
Species or population named in RQ yes no
Comment:
You got a very nice research question, it’s short and sweet.
Variables table is understandable, I think you need to add a few more in the independent
variables .

Bii.
Hypotheses is testable yes no
Hypothesis supported by research yes no
Intext citations yes no
Comment:
Your hypothesis is really nice but it’s too long, you don’t have to explain every detail.just a
reminder, that you are missing citations.

Biii.
Independent variable stated and briefly explained yes no
How it will be measured and units yes no
Dependent variable stated and briefly explained yes no
How it will be measured and units yes____ no ______
Control variables yes____ no ______
Variables in a table (they don’t have to be) yes no
Variables clear and complete yes no
Comment:
Understandable variables, you’ve listed most of the units that are in each variables.

Biv.
Materials clearly listed including units yes no
Method bullet points yes no
Method complete (you could carry out the experiment) yes no
Safety explained yes no
Controls explained yes no
Comment:
I didn’t know there was supposed to be a section for safety explanations, so as controlled.
Methods are easy to follow and understandable.
Ci.
Data collected in table yes no
Table has title yes no
Title has number yes no
Units in headers of tables yes no
A sentence below the table describes what the table shows yes no
Comment: I add the header for you, the graph 1,2,3,and 4. You just need to discuss about the
graph.

Data processed yes no

At least one calculation shown for each calculation yes no
Processed data in same table as collected yes no
Processed data in a different table yes no
Graph yes no
Graph titled yes no
Axis labelled (including units) yes no

A sentence or two describing finding yes no

Comment:

C.ii Conclusion
Complete summary of findings from Ci. yes no
Explained what happened to variables citing evidence yes no
Comment:

C.iii
Evaluated hypothesis citing evidence yes no
Explained whether hypothesis is supported or not yes no
Reasons are complete yes no
Scientific sources are used to support findings yes no
Comment:

C.iv
Limitations
Explains how the method allowed for the RQ to be answered yes no
Strengths of method yes no
Weaknesses of method yes no
Reliability of data explained in answering RQ yes no
Comment:
Cv.
Improvements
Recommendations for every weakness given yes no
Suggestions are realistic yes no
Suggestions are based on scientific research yes no
Comment:

Works Cited
MLA yes no
Complete yes no
Correct yes no

Overall comment
Easy to follow structure yes no

Concise yes no

Grammar correct yes no

Spelling correct yes no

Makes sense yes no