The rubric outlines criteria for grading a differentiated performance task on an experimental paper in 7th grade. It evaluates students on introduction/objectives, experimental design, data collection/organization, conclusion/recommendations, content, appropriateness of design, impact, and practicality. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to guide scoring from 1 to 4, with 4 being outstanding and demonstrating deep understanding, and 1 being beginning level. The rubric aims to holistically assess the various components of an experimental paper and a student's mastery of the scientific process.
The rubric outlines criteria for grading a differentiated performance task on an experimental paper in 7th grade. It evaluates students on introduction/objectives, experimental design, data collection/organization, conclusion/recommendations, content, appropriateness of design, impact, and practicality. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to guide scoring from 1 to 4, with 4 being outstanding and demonstrating deep understanding, and 1 being beginning level. The rubric aims to holistically assess the various components of an experimental paper and a student's mastery of the scientific process.
The rubric outlines criteria for grading a differentiated performance task on an experimental paper in 7th grade. It evaluates students on introduction/objectives, experimental design, data collection/organization, conclusion/recommendations, content, appropriateness of design, impact, and practicality. For each criterion, it provides descriptors to guide scoring from 1 to 4, with 4 being outstanding and demonstrating deep understanding, and 1 being beginning level. The rubric aims to holistically assess the various components of an experimental paper and a student's mastery of the scientific process.
4 3 2 1 Introduction All objectives are clearly All of the objectives are Some of the objectives There is no objective (Objectives and stated. The hypothesis is clearly stated. The are clearly stated. The stated and the hypothesis Hypothesis) concise and clearly hypothesis clearly hypothesis reflects a does not clearly reflect reflects the variables of reflects the variables of singular variable for the the variables of the the study. the study. study. study. Experimental Design All materials are listed Most of the materials are Some of the materials No materials are listed. and have proper units. listed and have proper are listed and have Procedure is not given. Procedure is detailed units. Procedure is proper units. Procedure and appropriate with detailed and appropriate is detailed but does not adequate number of with adequate number of specify trials in order to trials. Steps are trials. Steps are test the given appropriately and appropriately arranged hypothesis. logically arranged to test to test the given the given hypothesis. hypothesis. Safety measures are addressed. Collection and All important data are There are a number of There are a number of There are no data Organization of Data collected and are data collected, presented data collected, presented collected, presented and presented and organized and organized in and organized in organized in in very readable tables/charts/ graphs. tables/charts /graphs. tables/charts /graphs. tables/charts/ graphs. Data collected are Some data collected are Data collected are accurately related to the somewhat related to the accurately related to the hypothesis. hypothesis. hypothesis. Conclusion, All conclusions are Most of the conclusions Some of the conclusions No conclusions and Recommendations & supported by data and are supported by data are supported by data recommenda tions are Bibliography reflect realization of the and reflect realization of and reflect realization of given. No sources are written objectives. the written objectives. the written objectives. cited. Recommendations are Recommendations are Recommend ations are given for the given for the given for the improvement of the improvement of the improvemen t of the study and are consistent study and are consistent study but some are not with the given with the given consistent with the given conclusion. All sources conclusion. All sources conclusion. Only a few are properly cited and are properly cited and sources are cited. listed. Some sources listed. have very comprehensive, detailed and updated technical information which can be easily understood Most of the conclusions are supported by data and reflect realization of the written objectives. Recommendations are given for the improvement of the study and are consistent with the given conclusion. All sources are properly cited and listed. Some of the conclusions are supported by data and reflect realization of the written objectives. Recommendations are given for the improvement of the study but some are not consistent with the given conclusion. Only a few sources are cited. No conclusions and recommendations are given and applied. Content The content of the The content of the The content of the The content of experimental paper is experimental paper is experiment paper is experiment paper is complete with additional complete, comprehensive but insufficient and not interpretation and comprehensive and insufficient. comprehensive. implication of the results acceptably sufficient. Some expected data Expected information is that reflects students’ All of the expected data were not discussed. not discussed. deep understanding. were discussed. Very comprehensive. Appropriateness of the The design of the The design of the The design of the The design of the designed experiment experiment is very experiment is experiment is not experiment is not appropriate and the flow appropriate and leading exactly leading to the appropriate. The of the process is leading to the solution of the solution of the problem. experiment is not to the solution of the problem. The steps in Some parts are missing leading to solve the problem. Use of scientific process are and the steps in problem. scientific process was transparently followed. scientific process are not followed and completely followed. recommendations were added to completely solve the problem. Impact of the Establishes and Establishes and The importance and Does not relate the experiment to self and communicates in an communicates the relevance to the personal selected issue at all to the community engaging and practical importance and and community level are the youth or their way the importance and relevance of the issue on not clearly established community. relevance of the issue on personal and community and communicated. personal and community levels. The importance levels. and relevance are clear. PRACTICALIT Y of Practicality of the Practicality of the Practicality of the Practicality of the the experiment suggested process is suggested process is suggested process is suggested process is not very good and justifiable very good and good but not justifiable. discussed. Additional explanation justifiable. illustrates student’s deep understanding of the topic. OVERALL RATING