Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 Consolidatnii
10 Consolidatnii
2f99
/,322
Consett~
Pvtrff
3Ctp .
__ l i
O, Fm',L sS;rrAw7
2
]B L
S2deU 2
_
_ XC
_ S _ _i_
33
nT
C_
3. RSch@s
/uvm CAngc
PCOnf)JdIO/4 PfXU~sO '3
I.
zi-
4.
;;c
dchatrvj
4,17
CC7ae
'"
4.3
UIAaw .
~4, -
,t c
/4,
-
4, 4.~
(;caphitc
s IAcodM
tp vv Esbm'4
4 7. ,9S&i
ecnts 6f
,E3S fd 0/ f
n / DitiG6er4e
/3
C.2 lv/v 46 6 o OP
a. CA3C
o/, o 7mt
J &4f *&u 4
7
e,4
/IJCC A/,.eouS
. P Ft ou
9.a .
cb
(s ).~ L .
CCQ/3/8 7 /e32Z
l 4--~
'
/4N/V/D70
OF F/A/6L SET7Tfi4J=,
/. ROLE O
OE or7E!
t.4#4a
,4....
P6W/
(T?7 02435-1o)
) SQ nyg 0, o./
2) L/
a" WA ?
o)
l(
?
Whvt redct.
6
Eop?
3) 4)
tC '
Z.
(-d: h, A t
z01sc-
F C - (ca
5Q~~~n!
8t
E
.~~~~~~~~~~~~i
/05
'
<,
CC Cc 319 7 3/3/e
3//
/ 2 32 I. 3
/4d _ /? -F /-L D er IC
ompzx,4710AA Cb7
77LO 7 3rlC/Pb
?, fLl-EL,41FA
,e/
112 - ble r
ee= C
40 o e f4
w
; CR
Cc
4 old,
0
<<<
.4
II $mU' icl
"I"
:4, /-
A,
> I.
?2
gv
(vn
Cd /I
Of
/) Ftn f6i fc
CR6og Cvf/dp)
2) 17/Xp zv&U44,¶.-,% s?
s) Mo
f nrporcan
t
Vlrow/
IP
I
4
2,3
Qscu.son
rtsco. t ,
2 ) TP/on va or J/ c
6
r
(LAd.C
' 8/-0.2, {,s4.'
3) Typlca/v/lues o Re
at)C...gt*;~u~h~ Rf 2
s-
CR
r~
e,
(z)
-~j
4 4 *R~s1 Ay-r
(im&
is.
10,, 7 C- 3131/ /
'I IAq
3, _/kFCNf/SV/1MS
Af'd.,
c/
2) Chan
l /
pcicng dose.ssf"
(econJ7n orlnlabo)
3)
Chngt
porbche
pQeoSo
s/chnt
conact%
S.ad
4.
E C NI4/5$ C WIs G- pREcoELMsLD/on4O PReFsU5RE
C,/ PAagscz/$iu9/)/concc
I T,
P
7r re a/v /- DV/oad q sepo
l5rss W/ec/
behAvor it 2/q3?4C'
vS '"p/OAG ci bah4w/or
4
sfr lo//l
I
racvMe/e / ->no-Y(o
Qjb/c
r - / ee str/ns, mt
.K I %
logT-
/0
TABLE V
Preconsolidation Category A) Mechanical One Dimensional Pressure Mechanisms Description
SF 85
(6
eostatic Stresses) Remarks / References
(For Horizontal Deposits with Stress In situ History Stress Profile Condition Uniform with constant axe with seepage) Often highly erratic (
1) Changes in total vertical stress (overburden, glaciers, etc.) 2) Changes in pore pressure (water table, seepage conditions, etc.)
K o, but value Most obvious and easiest to identify at given OCR varies for rload vs.
B) Desiccation
~o
C) Drained Creep (Aging)
a
Can deviate Drying crusts found at from Ko, e.g. surface of mostland depoisotropic sitsi can be'at depth
capillary
stresses Ko, but not necessarily normally consolidated value
;. .
Vru Z1r
D) Physico-Chemi cal
Not
No Information
Poorly understood and often difficult to prove. Very pronounced in eastern greyCanad (1972), ayBi, errgum (1973San(1980)
Uniform 2) Other causes of bonding due to ion exchange, thixotropy, "weathering"Quigley etc.
43 ",chonical"
aa-= .-
A
Consnf
a) C/
I) Oeriurden
/~~~~~~~-_
CCL33'8 7 /322
f f
/ -vPc
?4~4Z ___
r/
--
2b7
2/?9
+1 f
b)
6 i a Ovu ddaQ
/)
,-
Wq r 7-c4 /
7..
-T, Ik
4re I.
1
I
v I
t,' I
. roAitc,
3
A-di Lr
2cxlh Cy)
#O/fom)
To ko)jrTu,') Ongtok
14
5/rscQ/on(Sryenisc#r )
t ) Evct ora/ -
v c/e t ,
edA.
2) /Frost
0 t0 C-
K&t A
t
C, T -.0
Jo- sCvdu 5M
Koor
". .. I -,s , .W f(~en
'.-
l~
--~
TTdad knd O /a
6/
Se
200
29ft. 18ft. 2.3ft. 1.7 ft.
meters
-200
-400
16,000 14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
-600
Time, Years before Present Boston, Sea-level and Post-Glacial Crustal Movements
80o
75o
10,850 10,630 10,700 10,550 10,200 Y - 215 Y - 216 L - 604 A L - 604 B L - 604 D
70o
65o
60o
55o
50o
50o
Canada
11,950 GSC-75
50o
9,450 I(GSC)-3
9,570 5-100 10,870 GCS-90 North Bay Ottawa Lake Ontario 12,080 W-883 Li
45o
45o
11,570 Y-691
10,600 L-604C
Drummondville 11,950 11,370 W-947 Y-233 12,100 L-678 14,250 &13,800 W-735 L-598A ?
LEGEND
?
40o
U.S.A
o f ic
Atlantic Ocean
40o
80o
75o
70o
65o
60o
55o
40
mi
5o 60o
0o
5o
10o
15o
20o
55o
England
Germany
Li m i t of i c e a
nce dva
25o 50o
(CL 3'/37
-
/,322
, I
/-D
%F(
Par- Ir
I :
61
I
/o
4.r
(Sc.GCo6r.
t
qr)
c 4tIe Jp
O i.iLK
,O PAysleche
-I Tp
sOcPet Ip)
M"
mmo I -11
i(
-"c
c/<Iceao45s
NA, cyc/es
z"
1-1
oce
/.23 1/3o
'
/Of
~VC
1-14
t,4 7/
C,1r Olt tR -A /
/v)
CR o (/:V6)
. /6-,./,
OC(/) m Nf:or5^%rcufJ'3
-1
C/ ICR
V/SCLSS/o,
r 3q
/a Bjerum (O72)
/nc4 aW w,^ 9
Ip S"Ilut
Why
CCLr,4, IC4j) ?
404.Ja;e A-t,
1G i sw
47r;;
, ffkp1a
Pc
COx
/4.R"w<
or mj Sf 'l
3) Wudc
YGt
?s , $,. ,,
oit IPWatclj t;
8?
/.322
-ec/
/, P,L V I 7
ff
71
2/fPAscc7
PX Y.5/ C -
i)
J/sYSS/o1 /2
tc*0 a /m
a
C1encrll
(3ec Tablev,o4)
on rO
( C7,O
cui'as of "o'ndn
"a-F
,~l
-C-
.mi ,Xr
~p
~A4
/f7. t '
r-
71 2
e,g,4
ta
Sh,
I
av
h /z r $yn4/
> d"Op
?o
I-D07Tt$V
f/rx
aIft
s'O a c;
Z, 0
J.5cyj-/, 4 Vt.
I
clab
da&
vu. . a
Indices 0 10 20 30 IP 0 1 2 3 IL
Frost
IL
Selected profile
IP(%)
0.3
' q/p
0.2
Intact
At z = 6.3m
0.1 0
0.5
' p
0.4
'= 35o
B-6
Probable Min. Min. Radius Casagrande Construction Max.
' p
Kc =
' p
' /p ' vo 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 p'/'p 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
At in situ OCR:
Triaxial Compression (TC) Triaxial Extension (TE) ' < in situ p ' : Peak qp(TC)/p ' Lab vc TC and TE (Destructured)
Normally Consolidated:
20
1000 Symbol Sample James Bay B-5 Marine:Block AGS CH MArine:Tube Ip(%) 9 42 IL 2.8 0.6 ' vo 95 85
(a) Normalized Stress-Strain, (b) Effective Stress Paths and Approximate Yield Envelopes from CKoU Tests on James Bay B-6 Marine Clay.
4 8 12 B-6
Note: ' > vo ' Most likely mechanism causing p James Bay: Cementation AGS CH: Mechanical and/or desiccation
16 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 ' (kPa) Consolidation Stress, vc 700 800
Compression curves for clays having different preconsolidation pressure mechanisms (a) Semi-Log scale; (b) Natural scale.
Apparent Maximum Past Pressure vs. Log Calcium Carbonate Content for Pierre Shale Specimens Apparent Maximum Past Pressure, 300 44 vm, kg/cm2 200 62 2 tests 100 40 104 87 61 46 ' =70 + _ 15 p 0 0.1 0.5 5 10 1.0 Calcium Carbonate Content, % 50 100 50 76 57 52 70 59 2 tests 42 69 38 25 20 15 10 3 tests 5 vm, MPa
55 70
LEGEND 104 Plasticity Index, % Range of apparent maximum past pressure, casagrande construction (Data from Geotechnical Engineers, INC.) 55 Data from this study and McKown
L 3/3/3 /,32Z
2/27/97
E-
z
0
0
U)
I~~~~~~~~~~~ (O
o 0
6 o
E-
!r
C O.
r,)
U2
CW
'O
...... .... .... ... .... .................. ...... . ..... .............. . .. .......
6
0
I
<
.
<00
e 00
0
cq
0 o o
z
O O
I
0 N
U5 nfi
0 r
0
I
0
I
0
I
4 >
'I)
>z
z 0 -0 o
'C
U-)
(0
rb
-
Z
O
o
#s E
-!b!
12 z
-4
0
o v 0
0
o
I
0
I
0 N
I
0
(IJ) NOILVA'Ia
0
I
0 (
I
0 I
o 0 0 00
I
CQ0 0 0 =
0 (
m m cn
mn
(1 a
< ( o 3l * -e~ooo.
I 1
CCL 3/3/67
f !
/1 322
*
)/gS
vl
/-'O -- -Pr
PGf ' -
3/1/6 3
2/97
/Cq
B~
I
-
IN,
5.,/ schemlac
mode, o /htrb(n
I
'Mu .,11
NE-
ofpQr,// Vo/Ibdi/y
ozsumplion vs cchnistr;
fC&midg) (W4t4L
14z
G
/03
vc.
5,2 Ecs
Ob5ct r
of /Dl/rnce
ower sf.
2)
Jsadly
p
ComrqSf,&,/h
3) 5,gn;fance/ntr.
,'. /C/ude Jho3cu/d
rCOmorassovn
?
4) :t/,.
/o,C r/gn
co,pn?,',/,,y
* dc/2-2
,^CC~rt
('kd4 rOsfo
-/ow-o1decr 5
cCI ~//5t05 s CR
gs
bt
1
Cncm mucAr
v/r
roou~
o,~,o.s*6 l{n~i/b
/,322
(CCt 3/2/9
EIUL Airt
Ad c, V"104r. gsK(l1Ss)
eYt Hj, (LOtA4) 4ta tt,4Onp Atw /IO. CCZ T Ae /qQ o &* 4Catc4,o."-/
UVO
T.,.,
o.
- (0-,5Lmdncj)
=T
I~~~~
.0
3:
OA
7p/e) 5042
.,
As/umed
3hould b tymwactrol
Obouf
-r " I
I,
-
;0,42(,
-
Consoidaton
-40-
trSX Js alv
(10,q
co/,Z
-It,,,
P-L
i~
/'a
I
pf
-O
14(/o ,ST/MztT
lf 2 Csrg/ndc(AC)
e * folf Cgmn
SfIdrudlsIc3c&4 : , U.X
i~M
,
/ 1V LC c / e z%
3c 4 4t
Jh12A
eb,,
>
oAX/o0)
II
(notCcu j /LAuAwOU -_ Wq
gil
2u/e"r-I/td (/?7?
,----
Jed,
Ao)
/o ( t)-
-E)] ./,3(I/O(/
'a~\'Ci-"'~~(e,9. -
I
\c cit-
,WT y r
/e ce
n no vah/i
1zi.v4)
COrmend ',
6,/ S~ran
Frr y --
/31)
VCL) Am t; "o t, CR dd A W'eYdcA,4 Sat p /2 fp/e ( 4c .0 j, -la.ty .Ce-'4 U d4oO ~ ~c ,o-'cj . ,~c r4~4
PoV
,. ^6.
~5F
6/
uLo au4i.*
7
pt
) /c,
SE
Zoci
Cc 3
/1322 1,322z
i1-D
rl A.a
Pr /
v~~
j
t
-)
t~
4.-
, Q
'
4
o C 0
w,
I-
to
Y,~~~~~~1
0
0 0
:ZEIC
= ()
it 757$
e^
//O,,/
(laej) uoWIAe
l30f0Jd
11
80
0.095 EB Crust
60 Project Elevation (feet) SB Crust 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Compression Ratio (CR) Oedometer - Disturbed Oedometer - Tube Oedometer - Block CRSC - Tube CRSC - Block CKo - TX Virgin Compression Ratio vs. Elevation at SB and EB Test Sites
40
20
-20 0.1
0 5 Vertical Strain, v (%) OED 8 EI.9.5 Possible curve 10 CRS 24 EI.55.1 OCR=3.20 (0.19 constant) (0.2) CRS 19 EI.4.0 OCR=1.12 (0.18)
(0.48)
15
100
CCZ
_ _
/7,/Qc
,
I I
/I ? 2
..
{-
I -D cf PK
-'Woey PEa uAIr 4'c/w Voiu7E6
,f
4
,
Y"
S79RA/#1 IER
() Crobs
(2) (3) ckr,
Gronn
Crooks,
(/le7),
(6(2)
4vVenac, f
(7f), een
4(4)
CCO
e >9
i v; 'r
w2-7 v2
1.u~
V-1 II
Wvf/Vd,
= (CA
ev) or a
, no
R'41' 3)
'A 7Qcihniwae WRa4):
'rVCA,
Jts0T6e tqfurgt
14' c
OCI'
o64 1 60fa
_
YED
TY
_
/ /51/7u
skAsscs,
(Jee p l2e)
--" I
I I
/I
TO
/
W
I
10PJ
I I -4wl
,--O--Fno/ a,
~4J
bt
,I
'II
1C1 - 0-
(/)
I Se I -I
/_
,/ - o/,-,,IU
0
0 I
'O/O
loccllJr , n/ i
I'P b b,:~~~~~~~~ ~ c~~~~~
'-O-O
or
-=
Fl"n / c-
120
W (kJ/m3) 16
100
12 8 4 0 0
80 W (kJ/m3)
60
Depth = 25.8m below Seabed ' hy Vertically trimmed oedometer sample ' h
{
20 A 0 B 0 400 800 1200
1600
2000
2400
2800
Horizontal Effective Stress (kPa) Work per unit volume interpretation of VTO test on overconsolidated Beaufort Sea clay.
N#MP
CCt I"/#/df
CCt3sr/
c t'It
m
e/26'
i....:..
! t
1:
..
I iI l.. i
: I i: I
. ,.... .
: tI .... I:
.. i
... .
.. .
(se)
~-~
' I l~ ::;:,:c
."!'-'
.
I.
..
'
i"' I.
., 1 i :1: I I.. 1. 1
. .. ,,
`b' :
VI
'=--
. ...
............. ......
... ... :~
...
1:~o,~td :i'~
'
Ch
i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~" I I"i : .. :.: II I i:: .. 1:::: :1: :::I' .::"1 : . :': ' ". 1: :1:
:.
::
-4&
6 , '!-: ig l }11
1 | | k
...
4' :
ir
'/
.
.~
p-:ii.!L...
.. ~;
... l.l : *" I~:' i:; il4 l . : *r ' " ' '" : **: ...:::. .i.. -.M : ...' ' ":. '1 _" : 1:' :1: '11 : 1 1...... " ::::::''":: 1l l .:...l I i;(II ,,,j ': ..
' .. '. ",1 i ' /,-. '.
: . '1.1
.l::.:::' ..l i
i,6/
-|l
T-
|||-
1-.
~ ~~
~ ~ .. i~~i i
...
-.
i...
::;:I::I:~::. "
..
. ''!nn~
....
.::..'
.,'
56Z-
/O
/2
14
/6
; CcclcrSofrt;
Fi
I7 OCdontar
smO/c
Oawo4)
?C 27/97 /
2/?9 3/9
1322
F55*16/T O
Como/, /arff3
EFFEC5
7 /55
Z7/Gcner!/ Guta/qn: I)
' sr , rpsa* pp
i AA(ia.t&
a)cdL~
'~ac
41A-tcar 4acliA~p~ W
rz-oty
r..C8E "
'); z,:Ei
W .
~~~~~~~tt
-r ' 9
_
_ $_v
-d -iJ ro.
w I c.,, , Ivvs<P4 5-S,
.r
2)
e,
aS
-` C ,c., 'YLYi
3) bfacu /V 4U h
pXket-
~i ILC GL~LZ j
XICP
7-3
4 4 V ) dLk
/5f A4 * St
'I4,,Or a,
" t~' o,5'4
- C e A/S
0'-#c
f. Ira 4aE,
2) Ftn
-mvvGn~ 6e~
Hui 1rC
ht~ (~y.,
t/3c
3) vct dv 4 iA
&a C/ 5, S(p
14
(ip/^d) InGb~
c.
m Ut l Psap PIfi4/
vm=1.35 vo vm=2.75
15
Test No. 18 12
20
25
12 8 4 0 0.1
Effect of Disturbance on Oedometer Test Data: Sample F1S57 (Depth = 128 FT)
0.2
0.5
10
127.0
E V W X Y Z -
Depth (ft)
127.5
S T U
UUC no. 4 su = 0.14 wN = 72.2% OED no. 12, wN = 64.8% vm = 1.35, CR = 0.25 OED no. 18, wN = 66.5% vm = 2.75, CR = 0.36
Torvane Onboard
128.0
Comparison of Oedometer and Strength Data with Radiograph for Push Sample of Orinoco Clay
Figure by MIT OCW. Adapted from:
1.2 1.1 ' /Best Estimate p ' Measured p 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 2 4 B
Recompression Strain vs. Preconsolidation Pressure from Oedometer Tests in the Soft Orinoco Clay
Adapted
Boring E1 F1
Symbol
Ip (%) _5 37 + _ 10 55 +
20 12 0 5 -20 -30 -40 Elevation, Feet -60 -80 -100 -120 -140 -160
Fill Sand Marl
10
20
Varved Clay
30
Apparent consolidation profile from 1st and 2nd series of tests
40
20
40
60
0.1
0.2
0.3
Preconsolidation, TSF 1st series of tests 2nd series of tests CRS tests
Elevation, Meters
/3d
CC 3/r2
,2/97
/32t
eConso/,c3r4id S
4/)X ?
Ad
r
vP
Mdtk eV "
H &44
i"
"S 2
80
I q-,
3ksf 60
C
.
40
2
0 20 ,,
a).
O M?)X-42
-40
(
Figure 5-14: South Boston Elevation vs. Axial Strain at Overburden Stress from CKo
CCL 3lB
CcL_3 /3
1, 322a
3
ztq7
/5
31/f
3/4/O1
Oa,
f%11 f /Og
I-st
s9earn a/ yiId I
\\
,)SC
5/oi)
)p a tP ( /oAw 24i
\
II-
4 / /A )
-II II,
,. ov)
:C0
mr
/Oatp \
/091 c/
Oh/nm oQ64c via c//ffcrAe/fP fS wSrA atyl Or Samefmsf -/i? da/ p/o/d vqryt,t
IV6 LCoP/r7'cIrs cone/ Cor ri
t P
or c5scMv
2) rypcL
/I d
/ dy
or/kkc
P varts
:
i'
PO4accQI
: sts
d.pL0
r lsr) f 4
(4sT
D213s-a
'X)*Zt fc 2e
bp/cSfic
OC-A/C.
CCI
Pcimmern4e.i
/arr
5. .
UVe
/o~se Hf
fr~A,/od h
pc i # / Q t
s,
Ccr 3t/?q
3/01
Ad.
/ 4a
q
xd 0
0 K
tj
CN
u~~ ~~~
-I
o~
IN To
44 oU N
O 'I
K O
co
N"
V) h
Vulpod2Y
/O/C7
1-4
0~4 K
v 0 0
4i
L(4
'b~h
0 t9
#1
O
,
4i
op
(,
N4
v
1%
I,
3 o 0 0 N1oN
0 I. CA
i~~~~~~
A_-) (LlayS /?I/D~
18v
- 44a
/r/.941 r Z //
CC
3/87
/,322
1Vo 2/92 Z/y7
o
/-o 'cA F?
3/89
/) Pncp/t
I/nec 7r
TV
k o7 -
,ry
H_
4IfE ,.J AlD, 9 7(10)
Di/omc
+ow
3
opro-k
4i
e-3 < -/oZ y
c r
&4oK/
2q .
(t
Cv,, E
2u
dv)
_6 I E /2
2b
r)v
,u
rJ v rM
2) Eecs 4)
of
on heSu/-d
bm I & '17Z I/
a-, -eep/6
dvn7Ioe
*/o tlC
3) /kesrj S Ca.4o
,e= ^W
Co,,, dcda.
Jk
* //
( 3/7 766)
x
4",2
CQe
2CC/CAd 2
(Mrf:;
tS
Q
b
l)
/o0 k
Ml/)
Ck
d/ 01,4
can -- erroneoi5
compressl
Cuevc
8,3 C
0 rlP3e
9 4) Ow ww*o/6 i
dq Aon A.I,
- Ai6 t
* 'a~ Ahl. C 4 4 ,i
Cped
0+
.2
_
CL 7 4
Y
) Y tSbo~r
104o U b
a"
a,L
/ogotB*1vi j
-4
tRAe) &tVY
f4I7 44-
CCL 37
1 4'?7
1.322
.1
er 806
Chyo/wn /
Ko rpo.v
Number and
Depth
St WL
symbol 11 2+ 2+ 3x 3x
3x
(%) 72 89 85 88 76
93
Ip 34 42 43 28 29
29
fall cone 15 22 19 70 35
88
(kPa) 14 25 27 20 20
25
(kPa) 21 55 68 35 38
58
(kPa) 47 80 90 65 67
87
Reference Samson et al. 1981 Morin et al. 1983 Samson etal. 1981 Samson etal. 1981 Leroueil et al. 1983 Samson et al. 1981
Samson et al. 1981
59 68 70 52 53
53
-::v
. . .
Varennes
Joliette
4*
5*
8.9
6.7
62
65
65
41
39
19
0.9
2.3
28
108
60
29
64
40
216
110
Ste-Catherine
il<
60 7V
8A 90 100
3.8 3.8
3.9 6.1 9.2
88 65
60 60 75
60 55
40 45 70
35 30
18 22 27
1.8 1.3
2.1 1.7 1.1
30 52
18 70
13
20 34
25 54 58
60 270
55 105 160
Mascouche
St-Alban Fort Lennox Louiseville
30 22
30 45
110
7.3
80
43
21 ' 2.7
85
25
60
88
l6f las
I-V
OTTAllWA ,CRAM;ORD,1 .i|
SE. TABLE I
VERTICA
STRAIN RATE ;,
,l
litr
/0-'IvrS
ia4 V -4
x /
, x
X
'r U
0
XI 'no
-~~~,o
b
v
-. - 0 -
__'__ O _O.
__ )b~/
__
ri:,
0.7
..
me7on / ra.e If It f.
. s;O /I
'gyoicoe .af It
CC , .. Ub
I'IL
/day
Or
CcL 3,/87
/. 32.
3/iq 3///O
/ - (rc~ 4Lff
'Vi "9S
r4cnn.roaJ aldwi*/1osn, Td CG807-825
/7 i.
3/O?/ 9
q,
/ CE L
9./
tAcr retu/s
(sep/7ic)
7ypcdI/fl31
Tj JC!!
-Cd
C 7 Uk
m S'C 0@U
d. f A G. /flejo
>>
e-
y?
,Hot
e
I
(R-4)
Wajer q-dJo/phon
lercr. T
/n)Cr. ?
Conocf 5tso
/tcr
h'/t
Om77
W
/ , ,J Schpe.a/
(R<4)
X //4z c4/ac/
R.#. (4Mc
fJne cdie,
Lachlro'
Frts(R> -/ .4 ) 2) 0 / cr P e
r
4~~,.* -J
I
V(.
"/ ,7 -V
al/ c
hcr
CCLt
/89
1, 3Z2
156
10
w
z
C,, 15 nJ A
I >
20
25
CONSOLIDATION
STRESS
o\c
(KSC)
Sample
No.
MP - B2 -S7
WN(%)
52.1
WL (%) 66.3
Wp (%) 31.3
op
1.7 KSC
RR 0.027
Ip (%) 35.0
Remarks TEST NO.
Gs 2.78
Corrected
eo
1.494
S(%) 97.0
for apparatus
COMPRESSION
Figure 4-14
/M/
En: ,Xar
Akcr/c s/C7
so rheis -(85s)
A i 2/Iion
f(L-L
t t,,,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
. .,...
I-,io4C ,
PA,4'r .1 rw"
170
60
--
4*7
150 so
so
*
_
IS
U.
W
_ __
C 0o c
I-
30
,in 0 o
... < cs
M== OCO
20
30
40
50
60
C
Temperature
ooc wroo
resressionanalysis.
7 I
qq~9 "II2
r rs>> GGS,
zl<
7r, r iJ
T-Dal'a
FIG. S-CRS test with varying temperature. Clayfrom Blckebol.
7d
IS'//f14r4(l8) SdvThCI4ys
/2
Orani
o
10
t` IQ
e From dsplaccmc
I
/te i(/Lq
,tSiT r 4r
*Ao) c/ay (,2(
of coomprtss'M
8
0
_6' - q
4-
Fq
0
I I
4)
I 40
S0~~~~~~~~
t0
.
810
- -1 I/o
l, oi
.'A V
U1,
(11/0
1.40 1.30 ' / p ' (T = 20oC) p 1.20 1.10 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60
20
Temperature, oC 40 60
80
100
5% per 10oC
Variation of the Normalized Preconsolidation Pressure ' /p ' (20oC)) with Temperature (p
Figure by MIT OCW.
CCL - 3/87 I-
/, ~32z
-I
m II
,/ 9
3 /qAl
o eC #a' c ofC 6,
3)/hChk &
conc, 0 4 n 19
cCiA
4) E
'
cf o jo// on 1aJcdted eJ
wwUocl W,,L
sot GC '
C
~W4s 9'kt
(-
i--;-t
--zI I*1 I
9/cc =- conc,
2.3)
( - sot)
W3
.- , onjl-fqef
GSL
C o,/Sogcc
crytc t$cA r
ev,: SY, S
kV
1
60
Popic Corr/a/r l
empirics.! Corrc/4luf
A' L -P/Q
iic
-
cAarU -
i/
b. cbC&n.SI Ln 'Covcrad /, 37
(a, DnIJ4
- r
/. P/t,4c r/CL
See /lq
2R20/3 /&r(/f)n
( med) efv
6 prc. /,m
- Clqs
/3cqO5sson
On
For- /r;s,&
cohsd
Vr
.CPTUJ
oc /51,61p
2/q7
1. 32 2
/ 32
/-/)ei
-,I
oz/vo
SUppreelri v
,, a4/cc
4 6/O Ons
i wvvqrr
w Ws
WV/ C V$
f - vv c ft
v\/ c vf/4 / C/,Yc;
Vs
So//
3:2
Gc
'
vc
W4 "
4.F VL
31; - t
-/ vaf on
ocV zIV
l/
z
W.3
Vt-
-C ,/
X,,
i 4c
(G' 0
Cvs
., ( /, C w')
( S
I
(Wj ') f
% V(
WS (/- C/)
w/[c
(/- C4.) Ws
+t)
(/- C le)
Q
oo/,
94pC0/cc3ao t?
wACn
6v0
4dd/SC,6 aRG/
fD
WX7r
C/
o (
CnJ4o
)
WC
CA4na
From
Q,,
C/s
EXe p/c
(,C 2 33-ct
i
w/
4r -O0)
Co - ,/ so/cc
loo
Wo 7) I7o-
C ~ 571
-4 Z / rv
Co (o/wt ,)
(s- 4'0
: C,/0
5(
-,I/.73 /6
40
--
k3
- O, W2 z"a) 1 ?3(o.
0,/5( '2 5/,r) 3 6a/ 2
476io)
Vs r'z S
3) ,oecra.Q , u IJ2 - fo ,
(at Wp)
4) PsIctdy CAQrt
/ - 0,/?3J(0, z9
6)
s)
C/flQurozd' t `L 4z ty InSc2
t.u.
Co
6o
07
, (s'/.-
GI --. WLc
JL -
(60,o-476)/64.3
0,/?2