Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Impedance Matching in The Audio Signal Processing (Part XX)
The Impedance Matching in The Audio Signal Processing (Part XX)
(a)
Figure 1.
(a).
(b).
(b)
The concept of circuit analyzed in the study
The equivalent circuit
2.1 Analysis of dc
First step, we have to calculate the Thevenins voltage in figure 1:
24
5
10 24
24
5
34
0.71 5
3.55
1|Page
"
"
2.85
150
%" 19'(
2.2 Analysis of ac
In the analysis of ac, we involve the capacitor to pass the ac signal and we also involve the internal
resistance of emitter known as )* (figure 2).
(a)
Figure 2.
(a).
(b).
(b)
The ac circuit
The equivalent circuit for ac analysis
25'
%"
)*
25'
19'(
)* 1.32
The second step, we have to calculate )
+,-* :
)
+,-* . 1 /0 1 2)* 34
)
+,-* 200 1 /150 8.2 21.3234
2|Page
1
1
6
158.2 1.32
1.32
158.2
6
208.824 208.824
) +,-* 201 5
159.52
6
208.824
) +,-*
1'
153.564
8+ 0.0065'(
8+ 6.59(
The fourth step is to calculate 8: :
8: .8+
8: 200 0.0065'(
8: 1.3'(
The last step is to calculate :
8: )
1.3'( 0.764
0.9932'
993.29
3. Simulation Work
The simulation work can be classified into the dc analysis and the ac analysis.
3.1 Analysis of dc
In the simulation, is 3 (figure 3), while in the analytical work is 3.55.
The different of the analytical work and the simulation work is:
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
3|Page
3.55 # 3
100%
3.55
% <8==>)>?@>
0.55
100%
3.55
% <8==>)>?@> 18.33%
% <8==>)>?@>
2.85 # 2.25
100%
2.85
% <8==>)>?@>
0.6
100%
2.85
% <8==>)>?@> 21.05%
% <8==>)>?@>
19'( # 15'(
100%
19'(
% <8==>)>?@>
4'(
100%
19'(
% <8==>)>?@> 21.05%
4|Page
% <8==>)>?@>
0.07'( # 0.0065'(
100%
0.07'(
% <8==>)>?@>
0.0635
100%
0.07
% <8==>)>?@> 90.71%
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 6.
5|Page
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(c)
8+
8+
8+
8+
8+
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
(e)
at 1Hz
at 10Hz
at 100Hz
at 1kHz
at 10kHz
In the simulation, 8: is 14.9'( (figure 7), while in the analytical 8: is 1.3'(. The difference is:
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
14.9'( # 1.3'(
100%
14.9'(
% <8==>)>?@>
13.6'(
100%
14.9'(
% <8==>)>?@> 91.275%
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 7.
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(c)
8:
8:
8:
8:
8:
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
(e)
at 1Hz
at 10Hz
at 100Hz
at 1kHz
at 10kHz
In the simulation, 8 is 09( at 1Hz, is 09( at 10Hz, is 0.059( at 100Hz, is 0.949( at 1kHz, 9.619( at
10kHz, and 15.29( at 16kHz (figure 8). The difference is:
For 1Hz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
1.3'( # 0.189(
100%
1.3'(
1.3'( # 0.00018'(
100%
1.3'(
% <8==>)>?@>
1.29982'(
100%
1.3'(
% <8==>)>?@> 99.986%
6|Page
For 10Hz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
1.3'( # 1.439(
100%
1.3'(
1.3'( # 0.00143'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@>
1.29857'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@> 99.89%
For 100Hz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
1.3'( # 14.39(
100%
1.3'(
1.3'( # 0.0143'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@>
1.2857'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@> 98.9%
For 1kHz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
1.3'( # 73.29(
100%
1.3'(
1.3'( # 0.0732'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@>
1.2268'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@> 94.369%
For 10kHz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
1.3'( # 84.79(
100%
1.3'(
1.3'( # 0.0847'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@>
7|Page
1.2153'(
100%
1.3000'(
For 16kHz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
1.3'( # 84.89(
100%
1.3'(
1.3'( # 0.0848'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@>
1.2152'(
100%
1.3000'(
% <8==>)>?@> 93.47%
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 8.
(e)
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(f).
(c)
8
8
8
8
8
8
in
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
at
at
at
at
at
at
(f)
1Hz
10Hz
100Hz
1kHz
10kHz
16kHz
In the simulation, is 09 at 1Hz, is 09 at 10Hz, is 0.329 at 100Hz, is 5.369 at 1kHz, is 53.89
at 10kHz, and 85.39 at 16kHz (figure 9). The difference is:
For 1Hz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
993.29 # 0.769
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@>
992.439
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@> 99.92%
8|Page
For 10Hz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
993.29 # 8.169
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@>
985.049
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@> 99.17%
For 100Hz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
993.29 # 809
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@>
913.29
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@> 91.945%
For 1kHz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
993.29 # 4109
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@>
583.29
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@> 58.719%
For 10kHz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
993.29 # 4749
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@>
519.29
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@> 52.275%
For 16kHz,
% <8==>)>?@>
% <8==>)>?@>
993.29 # 4759
100%
993.29
% <8==>)>?@>
9|Page
518.29
100%
993.29
In this study, the simulation shows that the 8 and became stable started at 1 kHz.
(a)
(b)
(d)
Figure 9.
10 | P a g e
(e)
(a).
(b).
(c).
(d).
(e).
(f).
(c)
in
in
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
the
the
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
simulation
at
at
at
at
at
at
(f)
1Hz
10Hz
100Hz
1kHz
10kHz
16kHz