Group Statistics Graduation N Performance training during B-tech MCA 150 14 Mean 71.4381 73.7693 Std. Deviation 6.

42430 7.76642 Std. Error Mean .52454 2.07566

From the above table it can be interpreted that the mean training score is more for MCA (mean training score 73.7693, SD 7.76642). The mean training score was found to be low for BTech (training score 71.4381, SD 6.42430) when compared with that of MCA. The significance of this mean was tested by framing the following hypothesis. H0 : Mean training score is same for both MCA and B-Tech. H1 : Mean training score are different for MCA and B-Tech.

Table 39 Independent Samples Test Levene's t-test for Equality of Means Test for Equality of Variance s 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper

Sig .

df

Performan Equal .13 ce during varianc 0 training es assume d Equal varianc es not assume d

.71 9

1.27 5

162

Sig. (2taile d) .204

Mean Differen ce

Std. Error Differen ce -2.33122 1.82824

1.2790 5.9414 5 8

1.08 9

14.70 8

.294

-2.33122 2.14092

2.2399 6.9023 3 7

From the Table () the initial focus will be on Levene's Test for Equality of Variances. This test was found to be significant (f=0.130, p>0.05). Hence we are proceeding with the assumption of equal variance. When the t-test for Equality of Means is considered, it is found to be significant (df=162, p>0.05) so we are accepting H0 which says there is no difference in the mean among graduation. Thus it has been statistically proved training score is same for both MCA and B-Tech