Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11(2):330- 336(2011)
PHYSICO CHEMICAL AND SENSORY QUALITIES OF OSMO DEHYDRATED BANANA (MUSA PARADISIACA)
Pallavi Anand and T.R.Genitha
Department of Food Process Engineering, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Allahabad-211007, U.P. Email: genithaimmanuel@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT This study examined the effect of osmotic dehydration followed by solar-drying
(2-3days) and Tray-Drying (60C ; 1.5m/s) on product characteristics (weight, Total Soluble Solids , pH, colour, protein and moisture ) for unripe banana samples. Three different banana samples were taken which are spears (Longitudinal), round and. cubes, at three different concentrations (45, 50 and 55brix), at three different temperatures (30, 40 and 50C) temperature each. Weight reduction, moisture loss and T.S.S increase were more significant at highest temperature which is at 50C
and highest concentration at 55brix. In addition it is observed that harvest season which influences initial moisture content, has a very marked influence on
drying kinetics. Protein content decreased after osmotic dehydration. However, no significant change in colour was observed in banana after osmotic dehydration.
Tray dried products were better than sun dried products. Products were
acceptable for a period of 1 month after storage in LDPE polyethylene bags.
Key words: Pre-treatment, Osmotic dehydration, Solar - drying, Spears, Sucrose.
Osmotic dehydration is a simple procedure
that is made for the concentration of vegetables and fruits. Osmotic dehydration is done by replacing solid food, whether in pieces or whole, in salt or sugar; aqueous solutions of high osmotic
pressure (:16). This brings upon two countercurrent flows: transfer of solute from the solution into the fruit or vegetable and large water flow out of the fruit or vegetable into the solution.Osmotic
In
India
nutritive and
fruit value
dehydration rates depend on several variables such as type of material (maturity state, shape, size) and pretreatments (blanching, etc) as well as process conditions, as solution composition
concentration, solution/product ratio, temperature and immersion time. Some of these
and
The objedtive of study was to determine the effect of temperature and sugar concentration on osmotic drying characteristics of banana spears, round and, cubes and to determine the physicochemical, organoleptic and quality parameters like weight, total soluble solids, colour, and moisture, before and after Osmotic dehydration.
of banana dehydration and used the results in designing a commercial banana drying plant was investigated
the
Earlier
improvement
from occurring (10). In countries like India, the production of tropical fruits, most of the time, overdone the local consumption, Banana is also not exempted. Banana has to be dried for long
term storage and therefore osmotic dehydration is
331
wheat flour were produced (1). Physiological, microbiological and sensory qualities of the
powder were studied after storages for 0, 3, 6 and 9 months. Among the physiochemical characteristics studies, no significant changes were observed in bulk density, total acid, Ph, total soluble .solids, and total ash, proteins and crude fiber. However, significant changes were observed in non a-total carotene enzymatic browning, moisture content, total sugar, reducing sugar, vitamin C, total carotene, and fat. Presence
There is a gradual weight loss observed as shown in Table 2. This may be due to the loss of moisture during drying (7). Weight reduction accelerates with increase in temperature as reported by (22). There was a gradual decrease in weight irrespective of sugar concentration, temperature and time of soaking. This decrease may be due to loss in moisture due to drying and loss of sugars, vitamins, vitamin C in the case of banana, (10). Weight reduction accelerates with the increase in temperature (6).
Statistical Analysis , ANOVA has shown that . both temperature and concentration had
significant role in the weight loss. ANOVA has shown that the F-test was significant, Critical difference was .006 at 5% level of significance
and Standard error was .033.
Temperatur
e(C)
30
Concentrati
on( brix)
45,
Dehydration
Solids intake is largely a diffusion process which is promoted by high temperature and the
permeability of the cell membrane is also affected by temperature, hence the observed behaviour is tabulated in Table 3. The sugar gain is a
Cubes
.
40
50
30,60,90
Spears
50 55
diffusional process which is promoted at high temperature and the permeability of the cell
30,60,90
Round
Recording parameters
Physicochemical
6
membrane is also affected (14). Table 3 shows that maximum increase in Total Soluble Solids was 20% occurred at 55brix at 50C for 90 min whereas minimum increase in T.S.S was 11.11% that occurred at 45brix at 30C for 30min and 50brix at the same time and temperature. For 55brix at 30C for 30 min increase was 12.9%
for banana spears.
Sensory
The results also show that temperature is directly proportional to the sugar uptake (21). This increase in T.S.S may due to the uptake of sugar
332
Anand et al.
S.No
Sugar
( brix)
Temperature
(C)
Time (min)
30 60 90
Cube s
0.1.1
45
30
40
30.
60 90 30 60 90 30 60 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90
50
50
30
40
50
55
30
40
50
4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
3.8 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3
3.1
4.1
4.0 3.9
3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4
4.1
4.0 3.8
3.7
C. D. at 5%
3.5 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.2 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.2 0.066
0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
'
0.031
ANOVA has shown that the F-test was significant, Standard Error was 0.486, and Critical Difference was 0.972.
darkness decreased only slightly as temperature and concentration of the sugar syrup increased. According to (20) the yellow saturation index of the product given by the 'b' value did not change significantly during osmotic dehydration indicating
that the processing parameters and the steps were successfully established in this study to minimise changes in quality attributes. The
preservative effect of sugar on colour may also be the cause of no change in colour during osmotic dehydration as reported by (8).
333
Table 3: TSS of Banana spears, round and cubes before and after osmotic dehydration
T.S.S( brix) Before Osmotic After Osmotic Dehydration Dehydration
S.No
Sugar (brix)
45
Temperature(C)
Time (min)
30 60 90 30 60 90
Spear
30
54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 54
Round
55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Cubes Spear
55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Round Cubes
57 59 60
61
40
50
30
60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60
50
30
40
55
55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
50
60 64 65 65 65 66 67 68 70 60 64 66 66 68 69 69 70 72
61
56 57
57'
58 58 59 60 62 64 56 57 58 58 59 60 62
63 64 65 67 68
57
59 60
61
55
30
90
40
30 60 90 30 60 9b
50
64 66 66 68 69 70 72 74
62 63 64 66 68 57 58
61
63
64 56 57 58 58 59 60 62 63 66
0.581
61
62 62 63 65 67
C. D. at 5%
0.972
0.596
11.8%,
at
50brix
at
and
temperature the loss was 12.9%, whereas at 55brix at same time and temperature the loss
was 13.9% which is the highest for Banana round. The moisture loss increased with temperature as reported by (4). ANOVA shows that the f-test was significant, the standard error was 0.268, and the critical difference was 0.535.
334
Anand et al.
Table 4 Optical Density of Banana Spears, round and cubes before and after osmotic dehydration.
Optical Density(pm)
S
.No
Sugar Temperature
( brix)
(C)
Time (min)
Before Osmotic After Osmotic Dehydration Dehydration Spear Round Cubes Spear Round Cubes
38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38
45
30
40
50
50
30
40
30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60
50
55
30
90.
40
30 60 90 30 60 90
50
38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38
38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38
38
38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38
36 36 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 36 36 36 35 34 34 33 32 32 36 36 35 35 34 34 33 32 32
36 36 35 35 34 34 33 33 33 36 36 35 35 34 33 32
31
36 36 35 34 34 33 33 32 32 36 36 35
34 34
33 33 32
31
30 36 36 35 35 34 33 32 32 30
36 36 35 34 34 34 33 32 30
CONCLUSION The maximum loss in weight occurred at 55bx at a temperature of 50C for 90min for Banana Spears, Round and Cubes which were 60%,19%
and 11% respectively. The pH loss was maximum at 55brix at 50C for 90min for Banana Spears,. Round Cubes. They were 30%, 27.5% and
335
Moisture (%)
S. No
Sugar (brix) 45
Temperature
(C) 30
Time (min)
30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30. 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60 90 30 60. 90 30 60 90 0.53
5
Spear
1
Round
Cubes
66.9 66.9 66.9. 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9' 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9
Round
57 56 55.4 55.1 54 53 52.5
51
Cubes
57 56 55 54 53 52 51.9 51.5 51.3 57 56 55.4 53.8
40
50
50
30
40
50
55
30
66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9
66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 0.377
66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 0.535
53.2 52
51
50 56 55 54 53 52.7 52.4
51
50 49.2 55
53 52.7 52.2
51
40
50
66.9
66.9 66.9
50
48
C. D. at 5%
2.
K.D
1998.
3.
stability of cereal based papaya (Carica papaya L.) powder. Journal of Food Technology 18:
,
687-696.
336
Anand et al.
4.
Brekke, J.E.
79-81.
5.
Contreras, J.E. 1981. An evaluation of osmotic concentration of apple rings using corn syrup solid solutions. Journal of Food
Science and Technology. 14: 310-314. Temperature and 6. Crank, J. 1975. effects on Osmotic concentration Dehydration of sweet potatoes. Journal of Food Engineering, 5: 67-72. 7. Gherardi, S.; Laratta, B.; and Castaldo, D.2001. Advances in Osmotic dehydration.
16. Rastogi N. K., Raghavarao, K. M. K. S., Nirajan, K. and Knorr, D. 2002. Recent
Development in
Osmotic Dehydration:
199-
17. Robinson, A.A. 1980 Research Design and Development of banana dehydration
process. Journal of Food Engineering. 3_:
255-260. 18. Robbers, M. 1997. Osmotic dehydration of banana slices. Journal of Food Engineering. 7: 89-91.
Karel, M. 1975.
7:9J-95.
9.
Lenart, A. 1996. Osmo-convective drying of fruits and vegetables: technology and application.Journal of Drying Technology, 14: 391-413. 10. Lenart, A and Flink, J.M. 1984. Osmotic
13. Mauro, M.A , and Menegalli, F.C. 2003. Evaluation of water and sucrose diffusion coefficients in potato tissues during osmotic concentration.Joumal of Food Engineering, 57: 367-374.
19. Ranganna S. 2004. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruits and vegetables. Tata Mc. GrawHill Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi. 20. Sabarez, H.T. 1997. A diffusion model for prune dehydration. Journal of Food Engineering. 3: 371-382. 21. Saravacos, G.D. 1981. Diffusivity of moisture in air drying of starch gels. Journal of Food Engineering. 1: 499-507. 22. Sadler, M.J.1993. Bananas ana Plantains. Encyclopedia of Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. 6: 89-91. 23. Torreggiani, D. and Bertolo, G. 1987. Osmotic dehydration of fruits and