Harish V. Katore et al.

/ International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

REDESIGNING OF TRACTOR TROLLEY AXLE USING ANSYS

Harish V. Katore
P.G CAD / CAM student Department of Mechanical Engineering, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur E-mail- harishkatore123@gmail.com

Prof. Santosh B. Jaju

Department of Mechanical Engineering, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur E-mail- sbjaju@gmail.com

AbstractIn Central India, various small scale industries are adopting the crude methodologies for designing & manufacturing the machine components. One such industry producing tractor trolleys for agricultural use has been identified for this study. The existing trolley designed by the industry uses heavy axle without considering static and dynamic loading conditions which in turn leads to higher factor of safety increasing the overall cost of the axle. In this study, existing trolley axle is redesigned considering the static and dynamic load conditions. A CAD model is prepared using CATIA V5 as a tool. Minimum cross section for the axle is calculated which resulted in the 24.8 % reduction in the weight of the axle. The axle dimensions are redesigned to 75 X 75 mm which is comparatively smaller than the old axle. The design is optimized based on the manufacturing cost of the axle. The failure analysis is performed on the axle of trolley used in agricultural area. These results provide a technical basis to prevent future damage to the location axle. Keywords: Axle design, CAD modeling, optimization, stress analysis 1. INTRODUCTION In the present market scenario, cost reduction technique is playing signified role to meet the competition in the market. Weight reduction and simplicity in design are application of industrial engineering etc., the sources of the technique which are used. Various components or products used in rural areas are mostly manufactured in small scale industries such as farming machinery, thrashers, tractor trolleys etc. It has been observed that these rural products are not properly designed. These products are manufactured as per need, by trial and error methods of manufacturing. Big industrial sectors have not yet entered in manufacturing of these products; hence no significant development in design of rural product has been done so far. Thus most of rural products are manufactured without availability of design. Tractor trolleys are manufactured in small to moderate scale industries. Through tractor trolleys are manufactured of various capacities by various industries, still there is a large vibration in manufacturing methods, component design etc. The trolley axle manufacturers are having no proper design of trolley, through these trolleys are to be certified by R.T.O. authority. It is observed that most of the trolleys are design for static conditions by tacking large factor of safety. Local Industries in MIDC, Wardha, is presently the leading manufacturers of tractor trolleys producing about 2000 trolleys per annum. The analysis and discussion with owner of local Industries in MIDC, Wardha, revealed that with proper design approach the cost of trolley axle can be reduced. As there is lot of competition in the market, reduction in cost is necessary. 2. TYPES OF LOAD The trolley chassis main frame is supported at two points over the axle. The chassis is connected to wheel axle through isolator leaf spring and to the tractor coupling. The leaf spring attached to main frame and to the axle at two points and this leaf spring transfer the total load to the axle.

2.1. STATIC LOAD ON AXLE The static load on axle is calculated by considering the fully loaded trolley model. The load diagram consists of the total load of load model and weight of axle. Considering the model, fully filled trolley, here the

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4702

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

trolley is loaded with total capacity including axle assembly of 73 KN. Thus the total weight of trolley is distributed and has been considered in same manner for fully loaded trolley model. As the leaf spring is used as isolator so point load conditions are considered, and the shear force and bending moment diagram are drawn. The procedure adopted for construction of shear force and bending moment diagram is as per following: 1. Determination of reaction at support. 2. Determination of value of shear force at change of load position. 3. Sketch the shear force diagram. 4. Determination of values of bending moment at change of load point. 5. Sketch the bending moment diagram. 2.2. DYNAMIC LOAD Trolleys are used in rural areas and on rough roads at moderate speed i.e. up to 40 km per hour. On full load conditions the speed is 20 km per hour maximum. Due to moderate speed and wavy road conditions the axle is subjected to dynamic loads which are nonlinear in nature. The load coming on the axle due to this are much larger than static loads, which makes it necessary to analyses the axle for dynamic loads. The shocks due to sudden velocity change may cause impact loading. The isolators are must for reducing such a high impact which may be the cause for failure. All these conditions have been considered while preparing its dynamic load model. 3. STATIC LOAD ANALYSIS The total capacity of the trolley is 60 KN but self weight of trolley and the axle assembly is 13 KN. So we consider the gross weight come over the axle is 73 KN. As the leaf spring is used as the isolator and whole weight of the trolley is mounted over there. Due to leaf spring the total weight of the trolley is transferred over the axle at two point C and E as shown in load distribution diagram.
Table 1. Specification of 6-tonne 2-wheeler trolley

General

Overall dimensions

Load capacity

Axle Tires

Single axle, 2-wheeler box type trolley Overall 3100mm (trolley box) length 4025mm (chassis ) Overall 1900mm (trolley box) width Overall 730mm (trolley box) height 1700mm above ground Pay load 60KN Unloaded 13KN weight Gross load 73KN weight One square axle is used presently 75*75 mm square of length 1700mm. Weight of axle assembly 0.75KN Two no. of 9 ( width ) X 20 ( radius )
Fig. No. 3.1 Load diagram

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4703

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

The axle having the wheel support at point A and B, so reactions are comes at point A and B and it comes to be_ RA = 36.88 KN RB = 36.87 KN 4. SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENT ON AXLE The shear force and bending moment at points A, B, C, D, E on the axle are found to be_
Table 2. Values for shear force and bending moment

Load Point A C D E B

Shear Force 36.87 KN 0.37 KN -0.38 KN -36.88 KN 0 KN

Bending Moment 0 KN mm 5714.85 KN mm 5899.85 KN mm 5709.85 KN mm 0 KN mm

5. DESIGN OF AXLE An axle is a stationary machine element and is used for the transmission of bending moment only. It simply act as a support for some rotating body such as hoisting drum and in tractor trolley case the axle is supporting of rotating member known as hub for holding the tires. So the axles are used to transmit bending moment only. Thus axles are designed on the basis of bending moment only. When the axle is subjected to a bending moment only then we get the following data_ * Moment of inertia of cross sectional area of the axle about the axis of rotation (I) is equal to 2636718.75 mm4 * As we selected the material for axle is SAE 1040 having bending stress (fb) (allowable) is 430 MPa. * Bending moment is found to be 30234375 N mm On the observations of the bending moment we found that When the axle length and the point load applied on it is considered then the maximum bending stress is found equal to 5899.85KN mm. When the material is considered and the cross sectional area is considered then the maximum bending moment is found equal to 30234.375 KN mm. As the axle is not affected by the length because length between two tires is same, so it will not be change. We considered the maximum bending moment is 30234.375 KN mm which is related to the cross sectional area of the square bar axle. The section modulus (z) of the existing axle (75 X 75 X 1700 mm) is found to be 70.31 X 103 mm3 as z = M / fb. We cross check this section modulus by using data book formulae_ Section modulus (z) = b3 / 6 = 70.31 X 103 mm3. So it is conform that the section modulus of the existing axle is 70.31 X 103 mm3. The axle self weigh approximately 0.75 KN. The maximum load on the axle is 36.5 KN. The figure shows the loading diagram for axle.
Fig No. 5.1 LOAD DIAGRAM OF AXLE

The maximum moment = 5899.85 KN mm The bending stress (allowable) = 430 MPa (SAE 1045) Section modulus (z) = M / fb = 13.72 X 103 mm3 In the existing trolley the square axle of 75 mm X 75 mm of length 1700 mm is used, Having section modulus (z) = 70.31 103 mm3. The obtained value of z = 13.72 X 103 mm3 = b3 / 6 = 43.50 mm = 45 mm.

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4704

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

Thus the presently used axle can be replaced by the suggested square axle of 45 mm X 45 mm as shown in figure5.2, but it required the modification in present hub dimensions. The other alternative suggested is combination of hollow square shaft with solid square shaft as shown in figure5.3. The hollow square shaft is of 90 mm X 90 mm and inside square of shaft is of 75 mm X 75 mm having length 1300 mm. The section modulus (z) is found to be 64 X 103 mm3 and the solid square shaft of 75 mm X 75 mm of length 800 mm having section modulus (z) = 70.31 X 103 mm3.
Fig No. 5.2 SOLID AXLE

Fig No. 5.3 COBINATION AXLE

The approximate weight of combination axle is 0.55 KN. The combination axle can be made by cutting solid shaft of 400 mm, and then the both piece of 400 mm shaft is machined to shape from one side as per fitment of hub. The inside width of hallow square shaft is 75.5 mm. and then solid axle is inserted into hollow shaft and then welded. 6. CHECK FOR BENDING STRENGTH The combination axle has to be checked for the developed bending stress due to load of 36.5 KN. fb developed = M / z M max = 20340 KN mm Z = 64 X 103 mm3 fb = 317.81 N / mm2 The bending stress is less than the permissible value hence combination axle is safe.

7. THE SPECIFICATION OF SUGGESTED COMBINATION AXLE 75 mm X 75 mm square shaft 0.800 mtr 34 kg Weight 44.2 kg / mtr Z = 70.31 x 103 mm3 Hollow shaft 90mm X 90mm x 8 mm 1.100 mtr 22.4 kg Weight 20.4 kg / mtr Z = 64 X 103 mm3 The total weight of combination axle 56.4 kg

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4705

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
Table 3. Comparison between existing axle and proposed axle

Sr. No. 1. 2. 3.

4.

Existing Axle Material selected SAE 1045 Section modulus 70.31X103mm3 Considering available bending stress 430 MPa Weight 75 Kg

Proposed Axle Material selected SAE 1045 Section modulus 64X103 mm3 Calculating bending stress 317.81 MPa Weight Hollow-26.52 Kg Solid Shaft- 34 Kg Total- 60.52Kg

8. STRESS ANALYSIS USING ANSYS TOOL The above suggested combination axle is safe or not, also proved by using ANSYS. The following are the images for existing axle from industry shows the equivalent (von-mises) stress, equivalent strain, total deformation and factor of safety. Solid axle geometry is generated in ANSYS and get the stress, strain, total deformation, and factor of safety by using the steps given bellow also figure shows the color effect which shows effect of load on the axle. STEPS Model o Geometry Part 1 o Mesh o Static Structural Analysis Settings Loads Solution Solution Information Results Stress Tool Results 8.1 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING AXLE IN ANSYS Figure 8.1.1 shows the solid geometry in ANSYS, any 3D modeling software (such as CATIA V5, PROENGINEERING) geometry in IGS from open in ANSYS.
FIG 8.1.1 SOLID AXLE

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4706

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

Figure 8.1.2 shows the Equivalent (von-mises) stress on the axle when the load is applied. Red color shows the maximum stress and blue color shows minimum stress generated on the axle.
FIG.8.1.2 EQUIVALENT (VON-MISES) STRESS

Figure 8.1.3 shows the Equivalent strain on the axle when the load is applied. Red color shows the maximum strain and blue color shows minimum strain generated on the axle.
FIG.8.1.3 EQUIVALENT STRAIN

Figure 8.1.4 shows the Total deformation of axle when the load is applied. Red color shows the maximum deformation occurs on the axle and blue color shows the minimum deformation on the axle.
FIG.8.1.4 TOTAL DEFORMATION

Figure 8.1.5 shows the factor of safety of axle when the load is applied. blue color shows the maximum factor of safety occurs on the axle and Red color shows the minimum factor of safety on the axle.

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4707

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

FIG 8.1.5 FACTOR OF SAFETY

8.2 ANALYSIS OF EXISTING AXLE BY USING ANSYS Sr. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Factors Equivalent Stress Equivalent Strain Total Deformation Factor of Safety Mass Values 6.3799 MPa 3.19 X10-5 m/m 2.335 X 10-5 m 15 69.088 Kg

8.3 ANALYSIS FOR SUGGESTED AXLE (COMBINATION AXLE) Figure 8.3.1 shows the combination axle geometry in ANSYS, figure shows the one hollow shaft and two pieces of solid axle.
FIG 8.3.1 COMBINATION AXLE

Figure 8.3.2 shows the Equivalent (von-mises) stress on the axle when the load is applied. Red color shows the maximum stress and blue color shows minimum stress generated on the axle.
FIG 8.3.2 EQUIVALENT STRESS

Figure 8.3.3 shows the Equivalent strain on the axle when the load is applied. Red color shows the maximum strain and blue color shows minimum strain generated on the axle.

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4708

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

FIG 8.3.3 EQUIVALENT STRAIN

Figure 8.3.4 shows the Total deformation of axle when the load is applied. Red color shows the maximum deformation occurs on the axle and blue color shows the minimum deformation on the axle.
FIG 8.3.4 TOTAL DEFORMATION

Figure 8.3.5 shows the factor of safety of axle when the load is applied. blue color shows the maximum factor of safety occurs on the axle and Red color shows the minimum factor of safety on the axle.

FIG 8.3.5 FACTOR OF SAFETY

8.4 ANALYSIS OF COMBINATION AXLE BY USING ANSYS Sr.No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Factors Equivalent Stress Equivalent Strain Total Deformation Factor of Safety Mass Values 11.168 MPa 5.5841 X10-5 m/m 1.3565 X 10-5 m 15 53.301 Kg

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4709

Harish V. Katore et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)

9. COMPARISON BETWEEN EXISTING AXLE AND PROPOSED AXLE USING ANSYS Sr. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Existing Axle Equivalent Stress = 6.3799 MPa Equivalent Strain = 3.19X10-5 m/m Total Deformation =2.335 X 10-5 m Factor of Safety =15 Mass =69.088 Kg Proposed Axle Equivalent Stress =11.168 MPa Equivalent Strain =5.5841X10-5 m/m Total Deformation =1.3565 X 10-5 m Factor of Safety =15 Mass =53.301 Kg

10. CONCLUSION The dimension of the existing axle is change to be reduced as it proved by above, but there is assembly problem in hub on the axle as the dimensions of the axle is change. As the dimensions are reduced, the assembly problem is occurred so other solution is given as the hollow shaft, which exist the earlier dimensions for the hub assembly on the newly designed axle. This newly designed axle reduces the 22.85% weight as compare to the existing axle shown in comparison table. Also reduces in the cost of trolley axle as the weight of the axle reduces. The weight of axle is reduced without compromising with existing hub assembly of wheel, factor of safety and stiffness of the axle. 11. REFERENCES
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Narang B.S. Automobile Engineering, Khanna Publication Arya A.S., Ajamani J.I., Design of steel Structure Balaney P.L. Theory of machine, Khanna Publisher Shigley J.E., Mechanical engineering design, McGraw-Hill Singer F. L., Engineering mechanics static and dynamic, Harper Collins. Shiwalkar B.D., Design data for machine element, central Techno Pbl. Malcolm K.G., B.A. Stout and S.W. Searcy. 1985. Instrumentation package for monitoring tractor performance. Transactions of the ASAE 28(2): 346-349, 355. J. Pierowicz, National advanced driving simulator utilization research. M.K. Salaani, G.J. Heydinger Heavy Tractor-Trailer Vehicle Dynamic Modeling. W. R. Garrott, P. A. Grygier Methodology for validating the national advanced driving simulators vehicle dynamics. R.S. Khurmi Strength of material. R.S. Khurmi and Gupta Theory of Machine.

ISSN : 0975-5462

Vol. 3 No. 6 June 2011

4710

Copyright of International Journal of Engineering Science & Technology is the property of Engg Journals Publications and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.