You are on page 1of 8

- 2013.

1, 2
svetozar.sofijanic@lasta.rs, nebojsa.curcic@gmail.com

, , .

, , .
: / //

INFLUENCE OF DESIGN ERGONOMIC DRIVER'S SEAT


OF A CITY BUS ON RISK MANAGEMENT
ABSTRACT
The safety of drivers and passengers, and thus the city's buses, to a large extent depends on the ergonomic aspects in the design of the interior of this type of vehicle. Considering the position of a city bus driver in
terms of ergonomic design and the ability to reduce risk in the management of a city bus, the paper deals with
data from service, with the recommendation regarding the mandatory use of seat belts.
Keywords: Ergonomics/interior city bus design/safety/risk management

1.


. ,
.
, ,
.

1.2.
1,
, , ,
2002. 2003.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).
1. e
, .
, .
.
1
2

,
,

152

- 2013.
1:
, [1]

2002.

2003.

2002.

2003.

245

247

4823

5245

80

76

16

128

199

23

623

643

16

217

205

72

45

144

148

41

783

775

12

13

4983

4977

37

290

324

27

36

441

455

862

910

135

161

162

137

381

302

20

12

63

110

11

24

1728

2083

10

321

272

212

274

316

483

11125

11476

36

75

417

826

17

10

8115

8196

1999 2003. ,
(. ) (. ),
0,1 0,6 . 40
18.000.
.
65 [2].
- , , , , ( , , ) [3].
-
- . , , , (.
, ).
, , , ,
[3].
. , ,
" ", ,
[4].
153

- 2013.


.
, 64,3%,
.
74,2% ,
58,0% (60 ) [5]. (
) , ( ),
(55,8%), .
55 0,72%
. [6]

1.3.

1,
.
,
. , ,
. , , , .

,
, ,
.

2.

,
, , .
(
). , 0-100.
,
. [7]

1-

, , , .
, .
, .
, . , , ( 2).

,
.
154

- 2013.

2 - [7]

3 4

5 [8]


30, : , , [9].

, .

155

- 2013.

, ,
.
.
3.


, .
350 .
,
.
3.1.
,
(P = ).
, , , , , .
1 5 . , .
( 1 5) ,
, , .
,
,
( 2).
2.

II

III

IV

()

6 10

11 15

16 20

= 25

I II , III IV . () V, ,
, o .
, .
( 3).
, , . .
(, , ,
.), ( , ,
. ),
.
, .
.
, , .
, .
, .
156

- 2013.
3.

20


, ,
,
, .

,


,
,

,

,


,
,

, ,

10

10

10

12


, -

3.2.
4 .
157

- 2013.

2008.- 2012. .
4.
, 2008-2012.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

2011.

,


,

2012.

2009.

2008.

2010.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15


, ,
,

, 24 .
7%. ,
.

.
, . ,
. ,
, .

3.3.
, , ,
. 3 , ,
.
, . ,
, , , . ,
.
, , , . ,
, ,
.
, . , ,
.
,
,
158

- 2013.

. ,
,
.

, ,
. ,
,
.

4.

, . , .
. , , , .
,
. ,
, ,
, .

5.

1. ***: Economic commission for europe, Statistics of Road Traffic Accidents in Europe and
North America, UNITED NATIONS, New York and Geneva, 2005, Vol. L - L.
2. L. F. Beck, A. M. Dellinger and M. E. O'Neil, "Motor Vehicle Crash Injury Rates by Mode of
Travel, United States: Using Exposure-Based Methods to Quantify Differences", American
Journal of Epidemiology 166(2), (2007), 212-218.
3. M. Peden et al., World report on road traffic injury prevention, World Health Organization,
Geneva, 2004.
4. V. M. Nantulya and M. R. Reich, "The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing
countries", BMJ 324, (2002),1139-1141.
5. A. Kirk, R. Grant and R. Bird, " Passenger Casualties in Non-collision Incidents on Buses
and Coaches in Great Britain", Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference
on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, 2003, Paper No. 296.
6. P. Halpern, M. I. Siebzehner, D. Aladgem, P. Sorkine and R. Bechar, "Non-collision injuries
in public buses: a national survey of a neglected problem", Emerg Med J 22, (2005), 108
110.
7. . ,
, , ,
, 2010.
8. . , . , , , , 2007.,
. 203-209.
9. ***: ( , 02.06. 2006.)

159

You might also like