Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problem:
Suppose there are three dice with 18 distinct integers on the faces of the three cubes. They
are numbered in such a way so that it is possible to obtain any of the integers between 1 and
216, inclusive, as the sum of the integers on the top faces of these three dice with a single
throw.
What can be the minimum value for the largest of these integers? (Hint: integers can be
negative!)
Solutions:
Most people found best (smallest) maximum to be 75, assuming that the numbers on the
dice came from arithmetic progressions. This is the sort of argument I expected. However,
the best value is 74. Ill give a short proof of this, and then the original solution by Dustin
that led to the value of 74.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30
0, 36, 72, 108, 144, 180
From here, we can get other solutions by adding any number k to every face on one die,
and simultaneously subtracting k to every face on another die. With some argument, the
following solution may be found, and may be shown optimal:
1
General Solution
The smallest possible value for the largest number on the dice is 74.
As a first step, we show that the largest value is at least 74. Suppose by way of contradiction
that all the sides on the dice have values 73 or less (and are distinct).
The only way we can roll 216 is using the largest possible numbers 71 + 72 + 73. Thus these
must be the largest sides on each of the the dice. The dice must be:
(. . . , 71),
(. . . , 72),
(. . . , 73)
The only way to roll 215 is using both the numbers 72 and 73 on the second and third dice.
If we dont use these numbers, then the next largest number available to be on the dice is
70, but then the highest we could roll is 71 + 70 + 73 = 214, which is too small. Since we
use 72 and 73, the first die must have a 70. Thus the dice must look like this:
(. . . , 70, 71),
(. . . , 72),
(. . . , 73)
By the same reasoning, the only way to roll a 214 is using 72 and 73 again. If we dont use
these numbers, then the largest roll we can make is only 71 + 69 + 73 = 213, which is too
small. Using a 72 and 73, the first die must have a 69. Thus the dice must look like this:
(. . . , 69, 70, 71),
(. . . , 72),
(. . . , 73)
Reasoning the same way as above, the first die must have a 68 to be able to roll a 213, a 67
to roll a 212, and a 66 to roll a 211. Thus the dice must look like this:
(66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71),
(. . . , 72),
(. . . , 73)
How can we roll a 210? We cant use both 72 and 73, since we used them in every possible
combination with the first die to get the numbers 211 through 216. The next largest number
we can use on the last two dice is 65. The largest total we can then make is 71 + 65 + 73 =
209, which is too small. In summary: If the largest number is only 73, then there is no way
to roll a 210. Thus the largest number must be 74 or larger.
The second part of the proof is easy: check that the numbering
(52, 43, 34, 56, 65, 74),
gives a solution. This shows that the best largest value is 74 or less.
Now weve bounded the best maximum value to be 74 or less and also 74 or greater. Thus
the best maximum value is 74.
easy, in the sense its easy to check that this works. Its not so easy to magically find this numbering in the first
place!
For each of these 71 possibilities, we can let d, e, and f vary, and check to see when we get
the smallest maximum value with distinct exponents. Note, this restricts d, e, and f to a
finite (albeit very large) set of values to try, so this guarantees well find all solutions. See
the list at the end.
To illustrate, for the factorization
1 + x + x2 + + x215 = (x126 + x117 + x108 + x18 + x9 + 1)
(x60 + x57 + x54 + x6 + x3 + 1)
(x29 + x28 + x27 + x2 + x1 + 1)
we can let d = 52, e = 9, and f = 44 to get
x(1 + x + + x215 ) = x52 (x126 + x117 + x108 + x18 + x9 + 1)
x9 (x60 + x57 + x54 + x6 + x3 + 1)
x44 (x29 + x28 + x27 + x2 + x1 + 1)
x + x2 + + x216 = (x74 + x65 + x56 + x34 + x43 + x52 )
(x69 + x66 + x63 + x15 + x12 + x9 )
(x73 + x72 + x71 + x46 + x45 + x44 )
So the dice are numbered like this:
(74, 65, 56, 34, 43, 52),
Note all 18 numbers are distinct, with a maximum of 74. Using a computer to check all the
thousands of variations for d, e, and f for each of the 71 different factorizations shows that
we cant do better than 74.
63,
63,
63,
61,
61,
61,
61,
61,
61,
57,
57,
57,
64,
64,
64,
64,
64,
64,
63,
63,
63,
62,
62,
62,
68,
68,
68,
65,
65,
65,
65,
65,
65,
63,
63,
63,
69,
69,
69,
68,
68,
68,
67,
67,
67,
68,
68,
68,
70)
70)
70)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
( 23,
( 12,
( -1,
( 23,
( 14,
( -1,
( 24,
( 14,
( 0,
( 34,
( 16,
(-17,
0,
2,
48,
2,
1,
50,
2,
1,
50,
1,
37,
70,
60,
71,
60,
62,
71,
62,
62,
72,
62,
55,
55,
72,
72)
74)
72)
74)
73)
74)
74)
73)
74)
73)
73)
74)
(54,
(54,
(54,
(56,
(56,
(53,
(53,
(52,
(52,
(51,
(51,
(54,
(54,
(53,
(50,
(50,
(53,
(47,
(47,
(45,
(45,
(44,
(44,
(44,
(44,
(43,
(43,
(42,
(42,
(42,
(43,
(42,
(44,
(44,
(36,
(36,
(32,
(32,
(30,
(30,
(29,
(29,
57,
57,
57,
57,
57,
55,
55,
53,
53,
53,
53,
58,
58,
54,
51,
51,
54,
49,
49,
48,
48,
45,
45,
45,
45,
45,
45,
45,
45,
48,
49,
48,
45,
45,
39,
39,
33,
33,
33,
33,
38,
38,
60,
60,
60,
58,
58,
57,
57,
60,
60,
59,
59,
62,
62,
55,
52,
52,
55,
51,
51,
51,
51,
56,
56,
56,
56,
55,
55,
54,
54,
54,
55,
54,
46,
46,
42,
42,
50,
50,
48,
48,
47,
47,
63,
63,
63,
68,
68,
65,
65,
61,
61,
61,
61,
66,
66,
71,
68,
68,
71,
65,
65,
63,
63,
57,
57,
57,
57,
57,
57,
57,
57,
60,
61,
60,
71,
71,
63,
63,
51,
51,
51,
51,
56,
56,
66,
66,
66,
69,
69,
67,
67,
68,
68,
67,
67,
70,
70,
72,
69,
69,
72,
67,
67,
66,
66,
68,
68,
68,
68,
67,
67,
66,
66,
66,
67,
66,
72,
72,
66,
66,
68,
68,
66,
66,
65,
65,
69)
69)
69)
70)
70)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
74)
74)
73)
70)
70)
73)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
72)
73)
72)
73)
73)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
69)
74)
74)
2,
38,
71,
0,
2,
2,
1,
2,
1,
2,
1,
1,
1,
2,
2,
60,
63,
1,
62,
2,
71,
1,
1,
66,
70,
1,
66,
2,
71,
2,
70,
68,
56,
63,
56,
71,
61,
70,
62,
71,
63,
71,
56,
56,
72,
66,
71,
68,
72,
70,
71,
70,
72,
71,
72,
65,
71,
66,
66,
72,
68,
65,
72,
67,
71,
70,
72,
72,
70,
68,
72,
71,
72,
69,
65,
66,
65,
72,
67,
72,
68,
72,
66,
72,
74)
74)
73)
72)
74)
74)
73)
74)
73)
74)
73)
73)
73)
74)
74)
72)
69)
73)
74)
74)
73)
73)
73)
74)
74)
73)
74)
74)
73)
74)
74)
70)
74)
69)
74)
73)
73)
74)
74)
73)
69)
73)