Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Identify, quantify, and reduce design risk (especially for critical systems) Provide a traceable document for making design decisions Prioritize which design activities to pursue next NOTE: A DFMEA is not a one meeting activity (It needs to evolve with the product)
Product Definition
Drawings, sketches, animations, and simulations Description of systems and components
DFMEA METHODOLOGY: (CONTINUED) (5.) Rate the severity of the failure effect
(linked to the effect of the failure) 1 = device operable with minor loss of functionality 2 = device operable with significant loss of functionality 3 = device damaged and inoperable, but repair is possible 4 = device damaged beyond repair 5 = failure causes moderate to severe operator injury
DFMEA METHODOLOGY: (CONTINUED) (9.) Rate the detectability of the failure 1 = uses sensors and active controls to avoid upset condition 2 = uses operator training/procedures to spot imminent failure 3 = fails without warning (10.) Calculate the RAN of each potential failure effect
RAN = (Severity) x (Occurrence) x (Detection) What are the highest RAN items?
DFMEA METHODOLOGY: (CONTINUED) (12.) Assign action items (13.) Complete Action Results Section of DFMEA
Change ratings if action results justify adjustment, but the rules are:
Severity: May only be reduced through elimination of the failure effect Occurrence: May only be reduced through a design change Detection: My only be reduced through improvement and additions in design control (i.e. a new detection method, better test methodology, better codes)
(14.) Repeat: undertake the next revision of the DFMEA Revise your DFMEA frequently! Include documentation of your results!