You are on page 1of 1

Table III: Direct, Indirect and Total Effects of variables CPD (D.V) Items D.E I.E T.

E Functional Attributes Attraction Informational Labeling Protective Features Hygienic Factors Brand Preference 0.274* 0.061 0.178* 0.061 0.045 0.351* 0.044 0.041 0.03 0.066* 0.117* 0.318* 0.101 0.208* 0.127 0.162* 0.351*

BP(M.V) D.E 0.125 0.116 0.086 0.189* 0.334* T.E 0.125 0.116 0.086 0.189* 0.334*

Note: * identifies the significance of direct, indirect and total effect among variables.

Table V: Summary of Hypothesis Testing Results Hypothesis Supported/ Not Supported

H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9 H10

There is significant relationship between functional attributes of packaging and consumer purchase decision. There is significant relationship between attractiveness of packaging and consumer purchase decision. There is significant relationship between informational labeling of packaging and consumer purchase decision. There is significant relationship between protective features of packaging and consumer purchase decision. There is significant relationship between hygienic factors of packaging and consumer purchase decision. Brand preference significantly mediates the relationship between functional attributes of packaging and consumer purchase decision. Brand preference significantly mediates the relationship between functional attributes of packaging and consumer purchase decision. Brand preference significantly mediates the relationship between functional attributes of packaging and consumer purchase decision. Brand preference significantly mediates the relationship between protective features of packaging and consumer purchase decision. Brand preference significantly mediates the relationship between hygienic factors of packaging and consumer purchase decision.

Supported Not Supported Supported Not Supported Not Supported Not Supported Not Supported Not Supported Supported Supported

You might also like