You are on page 1of 3

Table 1 Achieving the Criteria

Name:

Team:
Date:
Names of team members
assessing:

This table enables you to describe in detail how the team member achieves the criteria. You
should diagnose relative strengths and weaknesses for each factor. For each factor use the
COMMENT space to give specific examples, typical of this team member’s performance. This
should illustrate the effectiveness rating given and any factors that have influenced performance.
Criteria Evidence Comments
Attendance/Participation

Volume of work

Quality of work

Knowledge/skills

Dependability and
consistency

Commitment/Creativity

Communication

Team skills/Team roles


Table 2

Effectiveness Rating Summary based on Table 1

Name:

Team:

Date:

Names of team members


assessing:

Criteria Excellent Above Average Satis- Not


average factory acceptable
Score 5 4 3 2 0
Attendance/Participation
Volume of work
Quality of work
Knowledge/skills
Dependability and Consistency
Commitment/Creativity
Communication
Team skills/Team roles
Overall comments:

Areas for growth and improvement:

Overall summary score:


Appraisal Appraisal Appraisal Appraisal
period 1 period 2 period 3 period 4

29th Oct – 23rd Nov 26th Nov – 21st Dec 28th Jan – 22nd Feb 25th Feb – date of
presentation Total:

Max = 40
Max = 40 Max = 40 160
Max = 40

You might also like