ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021 MAY 2020 TRIMESTER UKML3043 BUSINESS ETHICS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COVER PAGE FOR GROUP ASSIGNMENT – TASK 1
Company Name: T1-ABC BERHAD
Name of Lecturer: Dr Wong Hong Chau / Ms Lim Yee Wui
Name of Tutor/Examiner: Dr Wong Hong Chau / Dr Tan Pei Meng / Ms Lim Yee Wui
No. Students Name Student ID Tutorial Group
Group Assignments (80 marks) 1.
2.
3. 1 4.
5.
** Please ensure that student names are arranged in alphabetical order.
UKML 3043 BUSINESS ETHICS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Appendix B FACULTY OF ACCOUNTANCY AND MANAGEMENT ACADEMIC YEAR 2020/2021 MAY 2020 TRIMESTER UKML3043 BUSINESS ETHICS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GRADING RUBRIC FOR GROUP ASSIGNMENT – TASK 1 Assessment Criteria Absent Poor Average Good Excellent Marks Awarded 1 Comment and discuss 0-4 5-8 9 - 12 13 - 16 17 - 20 the ethics programme Failed to provide Little and lack of Satisfactory Well – explained Highly competent of the chosen appropriate ability in evaluation/ evaluation and with and detailed with very depth company. evaluation / discussion/ relevant and evaluation/ and thorough (20 marks) discussion / analysis. appropriate discussion/ evaluation/ analysis. evaluation/discussi analysis. discussion/ on/analysis. analysis.
2 Support the report with 0-4 5-8 9 - 12 13 - 16 17 - 20
the ethical practices Failed to provide Little and lack of Satisfactory Well – explained Highly competent embedded in the appropriate ability in evaluation/ evaluation and with and detailed with very depth company. evaluation / discussion/ relevant and evaluation/ and thorough (20 marks) discussion / analysis. appropriate discussion/ evaluation/ analysis. evaluation/discussi analysis. discussion/ on/analysis. analysis.
3 Then, assess the 0-4 5-8 9 - 12 13 - 16 17 - 20
significance of the Failed to provide Little and lack of Satisfactory Well – explained Highly competent ethics programme to appropriate ability in evaluation/ evaluation and with and detailed with very depth the company. evaluation / discussion/ relevant and evaluation/ and thorough (20 marks) discussion / analysis. appropriate discussion/ evaluation/ analysis. evaluation/discussi analysis. discussion/ on/analysis. analysis.
Implications of the Failed to provide Little and lack of Satisfactory Well – explained Highly competent Covid-19 pandemic to appropriate ability in evaluation/ evaluation and with and detailed with very depth the company. evaluation / discussion/ relevant and evaluation/ and thorough (20 marks) discussion / analysis. appropriate discussion/ evaluation/ analysis. evaluation/discussi analysis. discussion/ on/analysis. analysis.
4 Referencing 0-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9 - 10
(10 marks) Failed to adopt Part of the APA Most of the APA The APA Meets and Accurate APA accurate and referencing and referencing and referencing and exceeds “Good” referencing appropriate APA citation is accurate citation is accurate citation is accurate criteria Appropriate citation referencing and and appropriate. and appropriate and appropriate citation
5 Overall Presentation 0-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9 - 10
and Structure of Majority of the Part of the report Most of the report The report Meets and Report presentation and presentation presentation presentation exceeds “Good” (10 marks) structure of the structure shows structure shows structure is criteria with rich The logical report is not coherent and some coherent and most coherent and each explanation, structure of report coherent and each sentences flow of the sentences sentence flows examples and literary accuracy sentence flows sensibly flow sensibly sensibly and at an application of Quality of insensibly appropriate length content ideas general presentation Proper length Comment: Total Signature of examiner: (100 Marks) Name of examiner: