Defendants used the money Defendants received from Defendants sale of Plaintiffs

check/Promissory Note to fraudulently encumber Plaintiffs real Property by claiming said money paid
to the third party(s) was Defendants money.
hus! Defendants encumbrances on Plaintiffs real Property are prima facie evidence of
Defendants fraud as it is a functional impossibility for the sum of the check/Promissory Note to be
used twice against Plaintiff.
"ore simply stated#
a. Plaintiff sold a Promissory Note to Defendants.
b. Defendants then re$sold said Promissory Note yet still failed to pay Plaintiff.
c. Defendants unlawfully used the money Defendants should have paid Plaintiff to
purchase specific debts.
d. Defendants purchased said debts in Defendants name instead of Plaintiffs name.
e. Defendants used said purchase to transfer the lien rights on Plaintiffs real
Property from the third party to Defendants.
i) Defendants used Plaintiffs money to buy the lien under Defendants
name so as to put the lien in Defendants name instead of removing
said lien.
ii) %uch criminal act is known in law as fraudulent conversion.
f. Defendant then unlawfully claimed encumbrances on Plaintiffs real Property for
the debts paid off in Defendants name with Plaintiffs money.
g. Defendants then used &legalese to trick Plaintiff into believing that Defendants
had given Plaintiff a '()*N.+
h. Plaintiff made monthly payments on said '()*N+ until such a time as Plaintiff
discovered material facts evidencing Defendants fraudulent and criminal
acts.
i. Plaintiff discovered that Defendants used the money from the sale of the
Promissory Note, and N) the money from any '()*N,+ to pay off the
aforementioned debts.
-. .t is a functional impossibility for the '()*N+ to have occurred as such would
re/uire the same e0act money to be spent twice! once for the purchase of
the liens and once to be given to Plaintiff as a '()*N.+
i) he purchase of the lien(s) did occur, therefore the '()*N+
could not have occurred.
ii) 1or the '()*N+ to occur! then the lien purchase by
Defendants could have not occurred.
k. o date! Plaintiff has still N) received the '()*N+ promised by Defendants.
l. Plaintiff has been financially devastated by Defendants failure to supply the
'()*N+ Plaintiff has paid several months on! and is still waiting to
receive.
m. Defendants knowingly! intelligently and willfully created the previous scenario to
defraud Plaintiff and millions of other *mericans in a far reaching
conspiracy to overthrow the government of the 2nited %tates and
unlawfully steal land from *mericans in the single largest act of conspiratory
terrorism in the history of the world as evidenced by the man that created the
concept almost one hundred years ago#
3 4.P. "organ circa 5657# '8apital must protect itself in
every way... Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages
foreclosed as soon as possible. 9hen through a process of law
the common people have lost their homes! they will be more
tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law
applied by the central power of leading financiers. People
without homes will not /uarrel with their leaders. his is well
known among our principle men now engaged in forming an
imperialism of capitalism to govern the world. :y dividing the
people we can get them to e0pend their energies in fighting over
/uestions of no importance to us e0cept as teachers of the
common herd.+