Chapter 5 The Performance of Feedback Control Systems

The ability to adjust the transient and steady-state response of a feedback control
system is a beneficial outcome of the design of control systems.

One of the first steps in the design process is to specify the measures of
performance.
In this chapter we introduce the common time-domain specifications such as
percent overshoot, settling time, time to peak, time to rise, and steady-state tracking
error.
We will use selected input signals such as the step and ramp to test the response of
the control system.
The correlation between the system performance and the location of the system
transfer function poles and zeros in the s-plane is discussed.
We will develop valuable relationships between the performance specifications and
the natural frequency and damping ratio for second-order systems.
Relying on the notion of dominant poles, we can extrapolate the ideas associated
with second-order systems to those of higher order.
Illustrations

Introduction
Steady-State: exists a long time following any input signal initiation
Transient Response: disappears with time
Design Specifications: normally include several time-response indices
for a specified input command as well as a desired steady-state
accuracy.

Illustrations

Test Input Signals

A unit impulse function is also useful for test

signal purposes. Its characteristics are
shown to the right.

Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

Y( s )

R( s )

s p s K
n

Y( s )

s 2 n s n

w ith a unity step input

Y( s )

y( t)
Illustrations

cos

s 2 2 s 2 s
n
n

n t

sin n t

Performance of a Second-Order System

Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

Rise Time, Tr
Peak Time, To
Percentage Overshoot, P.O.
Settling Time, Ts
Normalized Rise Time Tr1
Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

Standard performance measures are usually defined in terms of

the step response of a system. The transient response of a system
may be described using two factors, the swiftness and the
closeness of the response to the desired response.
The swiftness of the response is measured by the rise time (Tr)
and the peak time (Tp).
Underdamped systems: 0-100% rise time is used
Overdamped systems: 10-90% rise time is used
The closeness is measured by the overshoot and settling time.
Using these measurements the percent overshoot (P.O.) can be
calculated.
Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

PO

Ts

M pv fv
fv

100

4
n

Tp
n

M pv

1 e

PO
Illustrations

100 e

Performance of a Second-Order System

Naturally these two

performance
measures are in
opposition and a
compromise must be
made.

Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

Illustrations

Performance of a Second-Order System

Illustrations

Effects of a Third Pole and Zero on the Second-Order System

T( s )

Illustrations

s 2 2 s 1 s 1

Effects of a Third Pole and Zero on the Second-Order System

Illustrations

Effects of a Third Pole and Zero on the Second-Order System

Example 5.1 - Parameter Selection

Select the gain K and the parameter p so that

the percent overshoot is less than 5% and the
settling time (within 2% of the final value)
should be less than 4 seconds.

Illustrations

Effects of a Third Pole and Zero on the Second-Order System

Example 5.1 - Parameter Selection
Ts

4
n

4sec

n 1
When the clos ed-loop roots are chosen as:
r1 1 j 1
r2 1 j 1
We have Ts

4sec and an overshoot of 4.3%.

Theref ore,

and n

2
T( s )

Illustrations

G( s )

1 G( s )

s p s K

s 2 n s n

2 n

Effects of a Third Pole and Zero on the Second-Order System

Example 5.2 Dominant Poles of T(s)

n
Y( s )
R( s )
For n
T( s )

Illustrations

T( s )

3,

a
2

( s a)

0.16 , and

62.5( s 2.5)

1 s

2 n s n
a

s 2 6 s 25( s 6.25)

2.5:

Effects of a Third Pole and Zero on the Second-Order System

62.5( s 2.5)

Example 5.2 Dominant

2
Poles of T(s)
T( s )

s 6 s 25 ( s 6.25)

As a first approximation, w e neglect the real pole and obtain:

T( s )

10( s 2.5)

s 2 6s 25

We now have

0.6 and n

accompanying zero f or w hich

5 f or dominant poles w ith one

a

0.833
n
Using the previously mentioned charts (Figure 5.13a), w e f ind that the
percent overshoot is 55%. We expect the setting time to w ithin 2% of the
f inal value to be:
T( s )

0.6 5

1.33sec

Using c omputer simulations the actual percent overshoot is equal to 38%

and the settling time is 1.6 seconds.
Thus, the ef fect of the damping of the third pole of T(s) is to dampen the
overshoot and increase the settling time (henc e the real pole c annot be
neglected.
Illustrations

The s-Plane Root Location and The Transient Response

Illustrations

Steady-State Error of Feedback Control Systems

For

Step Input - Position Error Constant

Ramp Input - Velocity Error Constant
Acceleration Input - Acceleration Error Constant

Illustrations

The Steady-State Error of Nonunity Feedback Systems

For a system in
which the feedback
is not unity (Fig
5.21), the units of the
output are usually
different from the
output of the sensor.
In Fig. 5.22, K1 and
K2 convert from
rad/s to volts.

Illustrations

The Steady-State Error of Nonunity Feedback Systems

T( s )
E( s )
E( s )

Illustrations

K1 G( s )
1 K1 G( s )
R( s ) Y( s )
1
1 K1 G( s )

( 1 T( s ) ) R( s )
R( s )

es s

lim s E( s )
s0

1
1 K1 G( 0)

Performance Indices
A performance index is a quantitative measure of the
performance of a system and is chosen so that emphasis
is given to the important system specifications.

A system is considered an optimum control system

when the system parameters are adjusted so that the
index reaches an extremum value, commonly a
minimum value.

Illustrations

Performance Indices
There are several performance indices:
(1) Integral of the square of the error, ISE
T

ISE

2
e ( t) dt
0

(2) Integral of the absolute magnitude of the error, IAE

T

IAE

e( t) dt

(3) Integral of time multiplied by absolute error, ITAE

T

ITAE t e( t) dt
0

(4) Integral of time multiplied by the squared error, ITSE

T

2
ITSE t e ( t) dt
0

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

System Performance Using MATLAB and Simulink

Illustrations

Exercises and Problems

Chapter 5

Illustrations

E5.5, E5.16, DP5.4 Select 3 more problems of

your choice. Submit One Set of Multiple Choices,
and Matching Concepts