Hypothesis Test: Mean vs.

Hypothesized Value
800.00
788.00
40.00
2.31
300

hypothesized value
mean Data
std. dev.
std. error
n

-5.20 z
2.03E-07 p-value (two-tailed)
782.63 confidence interval 98.% lower
793.37 confidence interval 98.% upper
5.37 margin of error

Hypothesis Test: Mean vs. Hypothesized Value

22.200
21.900
1.420
0.237
36

hypothesized value
mean Data
std. dev.
std. error
n

-1.27 z
.1025 p-value (one-tailed, lower)

Hypothesis Test: Mean vs. Hypothesized Value

40.00
38.00
5.80
0.73
64

hypothesized value
mean Data
std. dev.
std. error
n

-2.76 z
.0029 p-value (one-tailed, lower)
36.37 confidence interval 97.5% lower
39.63 confidence interval 97.5% upper
1.63 margin of error

Hypothesis Test: Mean vs. Hypothesized Value

162.500
162.500
6.900
0.976
50

hypothesized value
mean Data
std. dev.
std. error
n

0.00 z
.5000 p-value (one-tailed, upper)

Hypothesis Test: Mean vs. Hypothesized Value

162.500
165.200
6.900
0.976
50

hypothesized value
mean Data
std. dev.
std. error
n

2.77 z
.0028 p-value (one-tailed, upper)

Descriptive statistics
count
mean
sample variance
sample standard deviation

#1
10
10.060
0.060
0.246

Hypothesis Test: Mean vs. Hypothesized Value

10.0000
10.0600
0.2459
0.0777
10
9

hypothesized value
mean Data
std. dev.
std. error
n
df

0.77 t
.2300 p-value (one-tailed, upper)
9.8073 confidence interval 99.% lower
10.3127 confidence interval 99.% upper
0.2527 margin of error

Hypothesis test for proportion vs hypothesized value

Observed
0.3

Hypothesized
0.2 p (as decimal)

6/20
6.
20

4/20 p (as fraction)

4. X
20 n
0.0894 std. error
1.12 z
.1318 p-value (one-tailed, upper)
0.0992 confidence interval 95.% lower
0.5008 confidence interval 95.% upper
0.2008 margin of error

Hypothesis test for proportion vs hypothesized value

Observed
0.53
8/15
7.95
15

Hypothesized
0.4
6/15
6.
15

p (as decimal)
p (as fraction)
X
n

0.1265 std. error

1.03 z
.1520 p-value (one-tailed, upper)
0.2774 confidence interval 95.% lower
0.7826 confidence interval 95.% upper
0.2526 margin of error

Hypothesis test for proportion vs hypothesized value

Observed
0.53
8/15
7.95
15

Hypothesized
0.4
6/15
6.
15

p (as decimal)
p (as fraction)
X
n

0.1265 std. error

1.03 z
.1520 p-value (one-tailed, upper)
0.2774 confidence interval 95.% lower
0.7826 confidence interval 95.% upper
0.2526 margin of error

Hypothesis test for proportion vs hypothesized value

Observed
0.55
110/200

Hypothesized
0.6 p (as decimal)
120/200 p (as fraction)

110.
200

120. X
200 n
0.0346 std. error
-1.44 z
.0745 p-value (one-tailed, lower)
0.4778 confidence interval 96.% lower
0.6222 confidence interval 96.% upper
0.0722 margin of error

1)

2)
Paso 1:
Ho: U=22.2
H1: U<22.2

Paso 1:
V.CUANT.
La duracion de los focos en horas
P.H. PARA PROMEDIO
Ho:
H1:

U=800
U800

Paso 2:
significancia =0.04
Nivel de Confianza
Paso 3:
Estadistico de prueba
Datos:
n=300
>30
media=788
S=40

Paso 4:

igualdad
(Prueba de dos colas)

/2=0.02
1-(/2)

Paso 2

1-

0.98

en megastat:
Media=788
S=40
n=300

2.03E-07 p-value (two-tailed)

si p< rechazar Ho

Paso 3:
Datos
media=
S=
n=
Paso 4:
788
.1025
40
300 Paso 5:
como p=0.1025>0.05.
Paso 6:

El contenido
despachadora es igual a 22.2 decili
con 5% de significancia

Paso 5
Como p=0.0000000203<0.04
Rechazar Ho
Paso 6:
La duracion promedio de los focos es
distinta de 800 horas con 4% de

Prueba de cola izquierda

3)
Paso 1
Ho: U=40
H1: U<40

0.05
0.95

Paso 2
= 0.025
1-= 0.975

21.9
1.42
36 >30 Z

Paso 3
Datos
Media=
S
n

4)
Paso 1
Ho: U=162.5
H1: U>162.5
Lest than: menor que

38
5.8
64 >30 Z

Paso 4
p-value (one-tailed, lower)

como p=0.1025>0.05. NO RECHAZAN Ho

El contenido promedio de la maquina

despachadora es igual a 22.2 decilitros
con 5% de significancia

Paso 2
= 0.05
1-= 0.95
Paso 3
Datos
Media=
S
n
Paso 4

.0029 p-value (one-tailed, lower)

.0028

Paso 5

Paso 5

Como p=0.0029<0.025. Rechazar Ho

Como p=0.0028<0.025. Rechazar Ho

Paso 6

Paso 6

Si hay razon para creer que la vida

media de los ratones es menor de
40 meses con 2.5% de significancia

Si hay razon para creer que hay un

cambio en la altura promedio con
5% de significancia

7)

16)
Paso 1
Ho: P=0.2
H1: P>0.2

10.2
9.7
10.1
10.3
10.1
9.8
9.9
10.4
10.3
9.8
165.2
6.9
50 >30 Z

Paso 2
= 0.05
1-= 0.95

Paso 1
Ho: U=10
H1: U>10

Paso 2
p-value (one-tailed, upper) = 0.01
1-= 0.99

omo p=0.0028<0.025. Rechazar Ho

i hay razon para creer que hay un

ambio en la altura promedio con
5% de significancia

Paso 3
Datos
P=

0.3

20

Paso 4
.1318 p-value (one-tailed, upper)

Paso 3

Paso 5
Como p=0.1318>0.05. NO Rechazar Ho

mean
10.060
sample standard deviation
0.246

Paso 6

10 <30 T

Paso 4
.2300 p-value (one-tailed, upper)

Paso 5
Como p=0.23>0.01. Rechazar Ho
Paso 6
El contenido promedio de un
lubricante en particular es de 10
litros con 1% de significancia

El distribuidor tiene la razon

5% de significancia

17)
Paso 1
Ho: P=0.4
H1: P>0.4

18)
Paso 1
Ho: P=0.6|
H1: P<0.6

Paso 2
= 0.05
1-= 0.95

Paso 2
= 0.04
1-= 0.96

Paso 3
Datos
P=
n

Paso 3
Datos
P=
n

0.53333333
15 >30 Z

0.55
200 >30 Z

>30 Z
Paso 4

Paso 4
.1520 p-value (one-tailed, upper)

.0745 p-value (one-tailed, lower)

value (one-tailed, upper)

Paso 5
Como p=0.152>0.05. NO Rechazar Ho

Paso 5
Como p=0.0745>0.04. NO Rechazar Ho

Paso 6

Paso 6

>0.05. NO Rechazar Ho

iene la razon con

No hay razon para que creer que la

proporcion de adultos que hoy
favorece la pena capital ha
aumentado con 5% de

Al menos el 60% favorece la

demanda de anexion con 4% de
significancia