Professional Documents
Culture Documents
API 54 126 Gilbert
API 54 126 Gilbert
ABSTRACT
The paper describes the tao-phase vertical-lift
lunctlon, explains the hydraulics of natural flow,
outlines t ~ o - p h a s eflow through orifices, sumnlarlzes
methods for estimating individual well capabilities,
and includes approximations for solutlon of naturalflow and gas-lltt problenls for tubing of the 1.66-,
1.90-, 2.375-, 2.875- and 3.50-ln. API sizes, and
crude 011s in the gravlty range from 25 t o 40 API.
INTRODUCTION
Advances I n knowledge of the diHerent lifting
methods do not lend theniselves to evaluation qulclily or i n slmple econoniic ternis. I n the aggregate,
however, they constitute the necessary b a s ~ sfor
in~provedl l f t ~ n gp o l i c ~ e sand profitabilities, wherever oil is r a ~ s e d .
Production by natural flow rightly tops the llst of
llftlng methods, inasmuch a s it produces more 011
than all other methods con~blned. It proceeds with
n ~ l n i n ~ ucost
n ~ In relatlve absence of operating difficulties; and 1s relinquished finally In an atnlosphere
charged with regret, and supercharged with explet i v e s intended to fortify the conclusion that the
stoppage 1s an irreversible act of Providence. Nevertheless, production men have been haunted for years
by the thought that a more defin~teknowledge of
flowlng performance would suggest means of resuming flow after premature stoppages, permit more effective well control, more appropriate How-string
selections, and serve In general to Increase the proportion of oil quantities economically recoverable
by natural flow.
bevelopment of organized
information on v e r t ~ c a l
flow has been s o far a matter of slow growth. A presentatlon in 1930 of the baslc theory by the late
Professor boctor J. Versluys' prov~dedan initial
impetus for current developments, but h a s been applied only to a liniited extent because of practical
difficulties in evaluating factors which appear in
the Versluys differential.
* N. V . De Bataafsche Petroleum
t
'
Maatsch~pp~,
The Hague, The
Netherlands
Presented at the sprlng meet~ngof the P a c ~ f i cCoast D ~ s t r ~ c t ,
D ~ v l s ~ oofn Product~on,Los Angeles, May 1954.
References are at the end of the paper.
A PRIhlARY DISTINCTION
T o develop an understanding of the behavior of
flowing and gas-lift wells, l t is essential first to
recognize that there i s one s e t of conditions affecting
f l o ~of gas-liquid mixtures into a bore hole, an entirely different s e t of conditions affecting flow of
mixtures from the bottom to the top of the well, and
a third s e t affecting flow through beans at the s u r face. We may designate the first a s "inflow performance, 1 9 the second a s "vert~cal-lift perforn~ance,"
and the third a s "bean performance."
Inflow Perfornlance
Knowledge of individual well inflow performance
i s a basic necessity in equipping and operating 011
wells for n~aximumprofit under any s e t of imposed
conditions.
Rigorous determination of the inflow performance
of a well at any s t a t e in i t s producing llfe would involve:
1. Measurement of the static pressure in the well
at the midpoint of the producing interval.
2. Measurement of the mass rate of inflow of each
fluid phase corrected to midpoint conditions for
each of a s e r i e s of steady operating pressures
measured at the midpoint.
Fortunately, such detailed deternlinatlons are seldom
necessary; but one or more very complete determinations in a particular field can prove helpful in de-
127
Lu
i? 5
2000
z Z
0
4 z
Lu
w3
LU
cd
I-
1000
200
400
boo
800
PRODUCTION IN BID
W. E. GILBERT
128
@)
STATIC PRESSURE
MAXIMUM GROSS
INFLOW RATE
@(CUT Ctzi%
GASILIOUID RATIO
CURVE)
.
0
Fig. 2-Graph
of watercut curve shown in F'lg. 1 generally indic a t e s water influx predon~inantlyfrom a relatively
low-pressure source, and the cut curve in Fig. 3
a predominantly high-pressure source. Cut-cumulative curves such a s the one shown in Fig. 2, are of
well-known value in estimating future oil recoveries
fronr wet wells.
In selecting the best operating gross rate for an
individual wet well, it IS sometin~eshelpful to plot
the approximate water IPH from the gross IFH and
two or three cuts a s indicated in E'ig. 4. However,
if s p e c i d t e s t s are necessary for this purpose, it i s
desirable to remember that temporary use of abnornlally high inflow rates can induce a permanent in@ GROSSLIOUID IPR
of Individual-well Inflow-performance
Trends
DETERMINATIONS
There have been instances of gas-oil ratio reduct ~ o nfollowing a change in the tubing setting depth
In flowing wells. However, the practice i s not recommended, especially i f it involves killing the
well with water, inasmuch a s the change In tubing
depth can have only a very minor effect of the drawdown opposite gas s a n d s for a given liquid rate;
and if the water reduces gas production, i t i s likely,
at the same time, to reduce the well's future oil potential.
MAXIMUM GROSS
MOO
GASlLlOUlD RATIO = 1 5 MCFIBBL
2000
1OOO
PRODUCTION IN BID
F i g . 3-Diagram
crease in water productivity under some circunistances, e.g., if the water shut-off i s insecure, or if
there is a wide disparity between water and oil viscosities, gentle formation dips, and edge water
close to the bore.
Lilfierential depletion i s progressive during sustained flowing periods wherever the ratio of lateral
permeabilities to vertical permeabilities i s large;
and interflow through the bore between producing
layers takes place durlng any subsequent periods of
shutdown unless a suitable mud i s spotted in the
producing interval. Thus any water inflow from a
relatively high-pressure source tends to seek out
and enter the more depleted oil layers during a shutdown period, and with permanent injury in some
fields to effective oil pernleabilities. After long pe-
129
W. E. GILBERT
130
2
4
6
8
10
12
PRESSURE
14
PRESSURE IN
HUNDREDS OF P S 1
t See p.
145-149, ~ n c l .
'
13 1
0
1
at
8,000 F t
132
W. E. GILBERT
Y1
rm
200
m
LIQUID PRODUCTION IN B / D
F i g . 7-comparison
from
5,000
I
400
of T u b i n g S i z e s for V e r t i c a l - l i f t
F t w i t h Z e r o T u b i n g Pressure
selecting bean s i z e s for particular wells on a trialand-error b a s i s and no correlation for two-phase flow
through beans has been generally applied.
The following approximation i s derived from regularly reported daily individual well production data:
435 r 0 5 4 6 B
=
1.89
wherern:
P = tubing outlet pressure, in psig
r = gas-liquid ratio, in klcf per bbl
= gross liquid, i n bbl per day
5 = bean s i z e , in sixty-fourths of an inch
' Approximate solutions for any one of the lour variables when the other three are known, may be made
by use of Fig. 29. Directions for use of this chart
with examples are given on p. 151. The constant
(435) used in the formula i s based upon Ten Section
data with beans of the types shown in Fig. 29, the
results of one sanipling from the Ten Section Field
being shown in Fig. 8.
An error of '/,,,-in. in bean s i z e can effect an
error of 5 to 20 percent in pressure estimates. In
many c a s e s , gas-liquid ratios are reported bnly to
the nearest 50 or 100 cu ft per bbl and are frequently difficult to determine because of fluctuations
which occur In many wells. Spot readings of pressure at heading wells are not representative of daily
averages. For reasons of thls kind, no fornrula could
be expected to maintain a 100 percent correspondence with observed data at individual wells even
though it correctly correlated the variables involved.
As an exan~pleinterpreting the forn~ula,the p e r
formance of ''/,-in. beans 1 in. in length i s illustrated
13
15
11
18
ACCURACY
20
7
/
40
60
80
100
PERCENT OF READINGS
Fig. 8-Indicated
Range of Accuracy of
Bean-performance Formula
(Ten Sect~onData)
LlOUlD PRODUCTION IN B I D
Fig. 9-Performance
of
''4, -in.
70
W. E. GILBERT
134
U DATA
nu
PRODUCTION IN BID
Fig. 11-Diagram
of Flowing-well Performance
100
200
300
400
PRODUCTION IN B I D
Fig. 12-Effect
of Gas-liquid Ratio on E q u i l i b r i m
Production Rates
yzlJ
12
N ~ Z
Ggz a
z<*
I( +
5 u
0
16
Ln
100
200
PRODUCTION IN 0 I D
300
I00
200
300
PRODUCTION IN 0 I D
FLOWING LIFE
PS I
135
TUBING PRESSURE
136
W. E. GILBERT
Headrng Cycle:
1. Because of the bypassing of gas Into the annulus, the llquid level IS slowly belng lowered, annulus o i l
IS belng displaced Into the tub~ng.
2. The w e l l 1s st111 producing at a low rate and the tublng column IS heavy because gas 1s beingdlverted
into annulus and o i l from the annulus is belng dlverted Into the tubing.
3. The welght of the tubing column IS belng reduced because no further gas can be stored In the annulus.
T h ~ sfurther reduces the Intake pressure, and
4. Allows gas from the annulus t o "blow around." For a short tlme the well 1s gas-lifted w ~ t hannulus
gas a t a hlgh rate, and thls reduces the Intake pressure t o ~ t slowest value. The w e l l gas is NOT
belng used t o best advantage.
5. The extra annulus gas has been dissipated and fluid, because of the low Intake pressure, IS flowlng
at a high rate Into both the tublng and the annulus. The tubing column IS becomlng heavler and the outflow rate IS d i m i n ~ s h i n ~ .
6. F l u l d IS st111 flowlng Into the well at a faster rate than ~t will flow out of the w e l l w i t h the exlsting Intake pressure.
7. The rate of outflow IS again In balance wlth the rate of inflow, and bypassing of gas into the annulus
starts repetltlon of the cycle.
Observatrons.
T h l s IS not an efficient type of flow because i t produces a large proportion of the o i l wlth a deficient
supply of gas and a small proportion of the o i l w ~ t han excess supply of gas.
The usual practice of beanlng a well back t o a low rate of flow t o avoid t h ~ stype of surging is not effic ~ e n t ,and In many Instances results in avoidable reduction of Income.
T h l s type of flow IS c h a r a c G r ~ s t ~ofc the latter part of the flowlng l ~ f eof wells i n most areas, but i s also
characterlst~cof many relatively new low g a s - l ~ q u ~ratlo
d
wells.
Heading actlon of t h l s klnd can be mlnirnlzed by use of tubing-casing packers, but where packers are
not already ~nstalled,use of casing-actuated intermitters may be preferable.
Fig. 15-Unsteady Natural Flow
Headrng Cycle:
1. A t the start of the flowlng perlod, the tublng IS opened by the r i s l n g caslng pressure whlch actuates
the motor valve. The column of gas whlch has collected I n the upper part of the tubing i s produced, and
the consequent r e d u c t ~ o nof pressure ensures flow of the fluld mixture In the tubing below t h l s gas column.
2. The tubing pressure trends downward whlle fluld IS being displaced out of the annulus, and then
3. Rlses as annulus gas starts t o break around the foot of the tubing.
4. When the caslng pressure reaches the predetermined mlnlmum, the motor valve closes the tubing outlet,
but flow Into the we1 l continues w l t h very l l t t l e decrease I n rate, both gas and l ~ q u l dflow lng Into the
annulus. Tublng pressures contlnue t o r i s e . The caslng pressure, whlch IS d ~ r e c t l yrelated t o the
amount of gas stored I n the annulus, a l s o Increases I n response t o gas and llquld enterlng the well.
When the casing pressure reaches the predetermined maxlmum, r e p e t ~ t i o n of the c y c l e IS started by
opening of the motor valve.
Observatrons:
B y regularizing flow, caslng-actuated lntermitters can be used t o Increase the rate of flow and extend
the flowlng I l f e of w e l l s when they reach the heading stage.
lntermltters are not t o be recommended for w e l l s whlch will produce more on the pump, but they are
recommendable:
a. T o Increase the rate of flow of w e l l s whlch have been beaned back t o avold heading.
b. T o regularize and increase t h e flow of new low-ratlo w e l l s u n t l l Increase of gas r a t l o s may permlt
steady flow a t deslred rates.
lntermltters have been used t o flow w e l l s whlch would not flow wrthout an ~ntermltter, wells w ~ t hwater
cuts exceeding 50 percent and w e l l s at rates exceeding 500 bbl per day. lntermitters have been misapplied, and mostly by inexpert selection of bean slze and casing-pressure ranges. The bean should preferably be as large as necessary t o ensure a continuous drop of casing pressure during the on-perlod (1 t o end
of 3) and n o larger. T h e casing-pressure range must be large enough t o ensure a flow of gas around the
foot of the tublng, s l g n a l ~ z e dby a steady buildup In tublng pressure. A longer range IS unnecessary and
often undes lrable.
W. E. GILBERT
138
UNSTEADY FLOW
A working knowledge of unsteady flow i s a necessary tool in maintaining desired production rates
and in avoiding unnecessary stoppages, particularly
in the latter s t a g e s of flowing life.
There are two principal sources of unsteady flow:
1, segregation of free g a s from liquid in the rising
fluid column, and 2, segregation of free g a s from
liquid at the tubing intake.
Fornlatlon heading, which is evident in L a P a z
F'ield, Venezuela, n ~ a ybe excluded from usual consideration inasmuch a s it cannot occur unless the
well i s tapping a fissured or cavernous reservoir.
Heading of the first type i s observable even in
settled pumping wells operating wlth low-liquid
volumetric-pump efficiencies and i s a relatively unimportant phenomenon. It causes relatively small,
and often irregular, pressure changes of short cyclical duration and has little effect on the continuity of production except in very weak flowing wells.
It may accentuate unsteadiness of the second type.
Also, its presence makes tubing pressures inferior
to casing pressures both a s indices of operation,
and a s means of flow control.
139
IN P S l A
DEPTH I N THOUSANDS
= TUBING
1 20
-U
110
VI
0.
+ 15)
2000
TUBING INTAKE)
200
600
800
PRODUCTION-RATE
400
IN B ID
W. E. GILBERT
140
must be made in small increments at weak wells because for each increase I n Intake pressure an easil y computed extra quantity of g a s must be stored in
the annulus before the well's full gas-l~quidratio
can be effectlve In the tubing- for lifting- at the lower
rate. Ignorance of this fact and lack of a readily
available starting compressor result in premature
relinquishment of natural flow In many cases.
GAS-LIFT APPLlCATIONS
It i s still true that no one method.of lift will provide optimunl results in all wells, and due process
of rating- wells and methods will always be d e s i r
able to niainta~nthe profit margins e s s e n t ~ a in
l meeting demands for oil.
p$I
TOTAL G L R
PERFORMANCE
FROM 5000 FT
WlTH 50 PSI
TUBING PRESSURE
RATE WITH
2 875'
(ii)
\I
PRODUCTION IN B ID
200
100
600
400
loo0
PRODUCTION IN B ID
GLR IN M C F l B
PRESSURE H PS I
Ya
em
7-
1-
g
g"
Z
lm
STIUNCSOF sun I N W ~
100 psi)
wherern. M = Mcf per day at 14.7 PSI. It 1s here suggested that thls 1s the horsepower upon which quotatlons should be based w ~ t hthe glven 7, pressure
ratio; 2, Input gas temperature; and 3, Input pressure, and may be from 20 to 40 percent less than
manufacturer's brake-horsepower ratings depending
upon the dev~ationfrom Boyle's law, the auxiliaries
used, and the overall plant effic~encyatta~ned.
Fig. 22-Chart Suggested for Estimating Gas-horsepower Requirements for Gas Lifting
W. E. GILBERT
142
stands in need of a ready means oi estimating horsepower requirements. P o s s ~ b al ~formula of the type
given In Fig. 22 can be adapted to this purpose.
Although n~anufacturersmay regard this suggestion
a s an over-simplification, they also may be Inclined
to agree that some simplificat~onwould serve to promote conlpressor s a l e s for gas lift In competition
~ i t hother lifting means. 1he temperature of power
gas, because of ~ t low
s
specific heat, i s usually
controlled by well temperatures at points of application, and usually the gas-rate requ~rementi s estimated at standard conditions.
-
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
'Versluys, J. klathematlcal Development of the Theory
of Flowing b e l l s , Trans Am. Znst. Mtntng Met Engrs.
(Petroleum Developnlent and Technology) 192 (1930).
kloore, T . V. and Wllde, H. D: Experimental Measurements of Shppage In Flow through Vertical P l p e s , Trans
Anr. Znst Mrntng Met Engrs. (Petroleum Development
and Technology) 296 (193 1).
Kemler, Emory, and Poole, G. A. A Prellmlnary Investlgatlon of Flowlng PJells,Dnllrng and Productton Practrce, 140 (1936).
May, C. J and Laird, A. The Efficiency of Flowlng
h e l l s , J . Znst. P e t Tech., 20, 214 (1934).
k a y , C. J Efficiency of F'lowlng 'Aells, Trans Am Znst
Mrnrng Met Engrs (Petroleun~Developnlent and Technology) 114, 99 (1935).
Poettmann, Fred H. and Carpenter, Paul G. The blultiphase Flow of Gas, 011, and Uater through Vertlcal Flow
S t r ~ n g swlth Appllcatlon t o the Deslgn of Gas-lift Installatlons,Drtllrng and Productton Practrce, 257 (1952).
Shaw, S. F Gas-lrft Prrncrples and Practrces, Gulf
Publishing Company, Houston, T e x a s , 1939.
'Babson, E. C T h e Range of Appllcatlon of Gas-llft
Methods, Drtllrnk and Productron Practrce, 266 (1939).
Sullivan, R. J. Gas-011 Ratlo Control In Flowing R'ells,
Drrlltnh and Productron Practtce, 103 (1937).
'
DISCUSSION
k being t h e a d i a b a t i c constant, and p l / p o , the minimum ratlo for which flow through n o z a l e s i s unaffecte d by po, t h e downstream pressure. If k e q u a l s 1.25,
the critical ratio i s about 1.8, compared with 1.7
u s e d in the report. T h u s , s u g g e s t e d u s e of upstream
p r e s s u r e s exceeding the downstream p r e s s u r e s by
a t l e a s t 7 0 percent i s b a s e d upon observation of
field d a t a and rough consideration ot critical r a t i o s
(values of k for oil-laden g a s were not determined).
T h e d e c l i n e of t h e production r a t e of a flowing
well is greater than the decline of t h e well's inflow
capacity, and t h e disparity i n c r e a s e s as flow continues. A s Mr. Sheldon points out, i t i s preferable
t o follow t h e well's inflow capacity, which may b e
plotted in terms of time, or, better s t i l l , in terms of
oil withdrawals, as indicated by c u r v e s 1 a n d 2 of
Fig. 2.
144
W. E. GILBERT
145
W. E. GILBERT
GRADIENT PRESSURE IN PSI
W. E. GILBERT
WELL PERFORMANCE
1. E s t i m a t e Gas-liquid R a t i o or t h e G a s R a t e
Suppose we have a well equipped with a '%,-in.
bean operating with a tubing p r e s s u r e of 7 2 0 p s i
a t 200 bL1 per day. No differential recording meter
h a s been i n s t a l l e d a n d a n e s t i m a t e of the g a s production i s desired.
Solutzon. F i r s t find in P a r t I1 of the chart, the intersection of the line for the 15 bean a t 7 2 0 psi;
g o vertically t o the s l a n t i n g 10-bean line and then
horizontally t o t h e v e r t i c a l 200 bbl per day line
in P a r t I. At t h i s point the gas-liquid ratlo i s about
1.8 Mcf per bbl, from which t h e total g a s i s 360
Mcf per d a y (200 x 1.8).
2. E s t i m a t e Production R a t e
After a bean change, a new well which showed
a ratio of 1,400 c u f t per bbl on t h e prevlous gage,
i s flowing through a 4 0 bean with 7 5 0 p s i tubing
pressure. What i s the probable production r a t e ?
3. E s t i m a t e Tubing P r e s s u r e
E s t a b l i s h t h e performance of a 13 bean for 0.8
hlcf per bbl.
Solutzon: Slnce the formula i n d i c a t e s that there i s
a straight-line relationship between tubing press u r e and barrels per day, only one point need be
established. T h u s , going h o r i ~ o n t a l l y from the
intersection in P a r t I of the 0.8 ratio and, s a y ,
200 bbl per day, t o the 10-bean line in P a r t I1 and
thence vertically to the 13-bean line, the pressure
1s found t o b e 605 p s l and for any production rate
with the 1 3 bean and 0.8 ratlo, the tubing pressure
i n p s i is equal t o the barrels per d a y multiplied
by 605/200 or 3.03.
4. E s t i m a t e B e a n S i z e
A well h a s been operating for a n extended period
a t 200 bbl per d a y and 4.0 Mcf per bbl ratio. It is
desired to reduce the rate t o 1 0 0 bbl per d a y and
the tubing outlet performance curve Indicates t h a t
t h e tubing pressure a t t h i s rate will be 1,800 psi.
What s i z e bean should be u s e d ?
152
W. E. GILBERT
PRODUCTION IN BID
g-
8-.
OF FEET@
- GWDEWS
I~
cm
OF FEET-@ G R A D I ~ T S
U
GRADIENTS
~ " " ' " ' " " " 1 ' " ' 1
"
'
'
"
GRADIEN~S
0
'
I
%
3X
(0
r!
:
m
(I)
E
(D
?
k
3.
(I)
:
u
Y'
-.
3
W
F
'-.
?
2
z
a
cP
<
!.0
C
La
B ::
"
I
VI