Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tadpoles. McDiarmid & Altig1999.
Tadpoles. McDiarmid & Altig1999.
nre hastet1 to
point out that some of the illustrations dep~ct.I tadpole with
almost no tall fins, toothlike strtictures on the fisM1ke lower
jm; front leg that looks very much like a pectoral fin, and
~ v h a tappear to be scales on tllc tail. Mqo, the sequence of
e i ~ h~lluarations
t
$haws a recently transformed metamorph
progressing Into a fislihke tadpole! Our review sugpeas that
proqess on understand~ngthe nature of tadpoles n.as belng
made but slowlv m d rel~ictantl!: if this paper is any inciication. The fact that the tadpole was d r a ~ ~inn right latcral
view, t l ~ u sprecluding the illustration of the spiracle on the
left side. also 15 of note. Recause of thi5 common structural
asvmmetn: it has become conventional to ill~15tratetadpole5
in-left late'ral vlen:
The earliest figure and descript~onof a tadplrv=i mouthparts were those bv Swamn1erd.im (1737-17.78, pl. 40, fig.
1). Nearlv a cennlnf elapsed before Saint-Arise (183 1) described tadpoIe mouthparts and Di1gGi.s (1834) described
and pamally ~llustratedl a n d m o u t h p . 1 ~In~h ~ comparative
s
studv of the o ~ t c o l o pand m v o I o p of ,imphrbl~nc.These
cla5s1cd works \trere t'ollo\ved bv the fi rst hlstologlcal s n ~ d v
of the de\~clopmcntof 1ahia1 teeth and j.11~. 4ieaths (Vogt
1842). Van Bambeke (1863) pioneered the use of lama1
traits, zncluding rnouthpnns. as rayononilc charac~enand
n.as the first to note lnterspecific ditference5 among European specles. There Followed sc\,eral s n ~ d i eon~ tadpoles of
Europe,m frogs. Amon9 the more noteworth\. are papen
hv Lrvdig (1876) on structural 1ari.ition in morrthparts and
Lamste ( 1879) on structural differences in inchvidual labid
teeth of L)ircqflfo.c~~ts
pictrrs; L a ~ s t ca l ~ ogenerated farnil id
names based on chancteri~ticsof the s p ~ ~ i c(e.g.,
l ~ s Mediogninidae [midventral spiracle] m d L c v o ~ r i n i d a e[s~nirtral
spiraclc]). Ke~ffcr(1888) d~scussedthe development and distribunon of labla1 teeth on the oral d ~ s co f A h ~ cobs~rfi-iurrzs,
s
and Schulze (1888) did the same for Peloltntrrfi~scrrs.Gutzeit
(1889) expanded on these comparative \vorh and studied
the development of 13wsheaths. Papers by Hiron-Koyer and
V J ~Bmbeke (1881, 1889) described and compared the
formation and structure of the mouthparts of tadpoles of 22
kinds of f r o p (15 currently recognized European and 2 African species) and built on the earlier work of Van Bmhekc
by recognizing that terrain morphologicd traits were uscful
in distinguishing among tadpoles of different species. They
d s o pointed o~rtthose 1nn.d characteristics usefill at the generic and E~miliallevels. Roulcnger (1892) recognixci the
value of being able to identi& tadpoles and presented a synopsis of u s c f ~ ~l al n d characters for distinguishing amon%
species. He darifiecl and expanded the results of previous
work, affimied the value of the position of the spiracle and
vent tube in distinguishing among groups, argued for including patterns of pigmentation in species descriptions, was
the first to p r o p s c a labial tooth r m r formula, discussed the
relative value of the distribution of neuromasts in species
characterizations, and wrote a key to the tadpoles of 1 Y species of Europcan anurans. This paper had a significant influence a n future workers. Tllc cxccllent illustrarions of the tadpoles m d mouthparts, some of the best elverpublished, nrerc
reissued in his nionograph on thc tailless batrachians of
Europe (Roulenger 1897-1898). Roulenger described only
what he cnllcd "matlire' tadpoles, and only recently have we
started looking at all stages of dc\rclopment in our delibcrations o n tadpole morphc~lop.
Interest in thc tadpoles of North h e r i c a n frogs also was
de\reloping in the later pare of the nineteenth ccntury. At
almut die same time that Hkron-Royer and Van Ranibcke
(1881) published their iniprt.int paper on European tadpoles, M a n Hlnckle!. independentiy had beLgun to study
the lanae of anurans in AIassachusetts (Hitickley 1880).
Her subsequent paper describing the mouthparts oitadpoles
of seven species was the first compantive work on North
American muran l a n w (H~nckley1881) and marked the
advent of comparative devclopmentd studies of tadpoles in
the Nelv \170rld. She quickly foIlo~vxiwith dc\~elop~iiental studies of nvo other species (Hlnckle!r 1882, 1884). Mre
have observed that older literature, even though niformarive, often is slighted m d that cunous obsenrations reported
therein too oi'ten are missed. For example, ~ i n c k l e y
(1 882:95) reported that Rnnn gdraricn occasionaUy has dual
spiracles, a condition not known in rmid tadpoles. In his
cInssic stirdies o n North American .kura, A. H. Wright
(lC?14, 1932) published detailed descriptions and photop p h s of taciplcs and clrawings of mouthparts of species
occurring near Ithaca, New York, and from the Okefenokec
region of southern Gcorgia. In a separate svnopsis, A. H.
\\'right (1529) described, illusmted, and presented a key to
tadpoles of 38 species mostly from the eastern and southern
Cnlted States. Some information on tadpoles appeared In
the first (1933) and second (1942) edinons ofdie Hn~rdltaoX.
of Frqgs nnd Ends by A. A. Wright and Wright, but it wasn't
unnI the third edition (1949; rcpr~ntedIn 1995) by A. H.
IVright and tjTrisht that a kev and photographs -of tadpoles 2nd their mouthparts appeared. Unfortunatel!; A. H.
\lrnsht continued to use only "niature" larvae because "halfgro\ipnlarvae . . . are ofien quite aknormaI in the usual characters used In I,zn.al descriptions." U'hilc the early w o r k by
A. H. Ct'r~ghtwcre uulv tlseful, his preoccupation with variof expressing relation ~d measurements m d c o m p l e ~\ln\!~
28
sophyne and Stephopaedes, sma African bufonids that commoniy breed in phytotelmata, have a circular, fleshy "crown"
that encircles the eyes and nares (Channing 1978, 1993;
Grandison 1980). We suggest that the hnction of this structure remains conjectural because none of the suggestions
(e.~.,
- attachment, floatation, and respiration) seem feasible.
Even t h o u"~ hthe dorsai and laterd ~rofilesof the tad~ole
snout vary considerably and their shapes appear to be phylogeneticdy and ecological correlated, no descriptive terms
have been proposed. Viewed from above, the snout varies
from rathe;ac;te to broadly rounded. In lateral profiie (eyes
to base of upper labium) the snout varies from uniformiy
rounded to sloping, the trajectory of which turns abruptiy
near the oral disc.
BODY PLAN
29
of elv~ia.
' a of whch are assumed to shade the eve from
intense light. The umbraculum (e.g., Rana vertebralis) is a
projeaion of the dorsal pupiilary margin. Elygia may occur
as a hemispherical area of melanophores extending lateray
from the kddorsal margin of the ;ris (ocular) or i i the dorsal cornea (epidermal).She corneas of an uddentified hyiid
tadpole (personal observation) are mostly pigmented; if not
a case of teratology, this rnay be an extreme form of epidermal elygium. Wassersug et ai. (1981a) noted similar pigmented corneas in Thelodemza carinensk. Recently we have
observed an ocular elygium in a number of other taxa (e.g.,
some Buf, Hyh, Mantidactylus, Pseudamis, and Rana), although often it is visible only with bright dumination and
at rnagnification of iive specimens. The eyes of Stauroisnatator are covered with "thick skin . . . but in stages 36 onward
Eyes and NasolucrimalDuct
there is a small, clear window over the eyeball" (Inger and
Eye position and eye orientation are different concepts (fig. Tan 1990:4).
3.2A). Position indicates where the structures are located on
The tadpole iris cornmonly has bright, metdic pigments
the head and orientation describes their manner of place- arranped
" in comviicated Datterns that seem to be influenced
ment or aiignment (e.g., facing direction). Eye position is by the topography of underlying blood vessels. Interspecific
generay described as dorsal or lateral, although a contin- pattems in the arrangement and distribution of color probuum exists. Dorsal eyes may face dorsay (upward), dorso- ably exist, but these features (e.g., D u e h a n 1978; Gaardo
laterally, or lateray, while lateral eyes always face laterally. 1961; Scott and Jennings 1985) have seldom been examThe eyeba of tadpoles is covered by a two-layered cornea ined. Aithough the entire eye can be rnoved, the round pupil
that is continuous with the body epidermis. Dorsal eyes have has no abiiity to adjust its size relative to iight intensity.
no part of the eye or cornea in the dorsal siihouette, and
During &id- to late metamorphosis, either dark pigmenlateral eyes have some part of the eye or cornea included in tation appears or the surroundmg pigmentation decreases in
the dorsal siihouette (fig. 3.2). Dorsal eyes e x e m p e benthic intensity to accent a shallow groove that extends in an arc
tadpoles in both lentic and lotic systems, whde lateral eyes from the anterior corner of the eve toward the naris. This
are rnost common in lentic forms that spend considerable nasolacrimal duct develops in association with the Harderian
time in the water column (e.g., many hyiids and microhy- gland (Schmalhausen 1968; see Baccari et al. 1990) that lulids). Relative positions of dorsal or lateral eyes can be quaii- bricates the eye.
fied verbay or by measurements. Lateral eyes are typicay
larger and have more cornea curvature and lenticular protru- Integument and Chromatuphores
sion than dorsal eyes. Eye size ranges from minute (e.g., Numerou uniceiiular glands throughout the epidermis of
centrolenids) to quite large (e.g., some nektonic hylids). The tadpoles produce mucus; chapter 5 has more details of integexceptionay sma eyes of centrolenids are located quite umentary histology. Small serous glands often are scattered
close to the midline, and because of their orientation and an generally over the body surface (e.g., Asca.phus and Poyntonia
apparent late closure of the choroid fissure, they often ap- paludzcoh) or concentrated along the dorsal fin, w i t h the
pear C-shaped in dorsal view. The extent that the eye pro- ventral fin, along the dorsum of tad muscle, and dorsolatertrudes frorn the surface of the head, the curvature of the cor- ally and ventrolateray on the body (e.g., Inger 1966; Liem
nea, and the lenticular protrusion also vary. We detect some 1961; S. J. Richards 1992; some Amolops, Huza, and Meriscorrelations with ecology, but definitive data to support togenys, Hyla, Hyhrana, Litoria, Rana, Phyllomedusa, and
these observations are lacking.
Physahmus). Tadpoles of someAmolops have keratinized spiVan Dijk (1966) discussed an umbraculum and two types nules on the dorsum that may abate turbulence as water
flows over the body; they also have various patterns of small,
densely arranged papiilae and iight keratinization in the roof
of the beiiy sucker. Short papiilae occur on the snout of the
tadpoles of Hoplophryne rogemz (Noble 1929).
Close exarnination of certain tadvoles reveals a circular
area of siightly contrasting color anterolateral to the base of
the vent tube. This slightly raised area appears glandular, but
it mavJ be associated with the lateral line svstem. It is most
obvious in darkly pigmented, neotropical, lotic hylids.
Bright coloration and distinaive patterns are important
sexual and species recognition features for many adult vertebrates but apparently are of little importance to larval or imFig. 3.2. Dorsal views of styiized tadpole bodes showing eye positions. (A) Lateral. (B) Dorsal.
mature ones. Dorsal coloration in tadpoles is mostly of
about on the forest floor. Definitive data are lachg, but it
appears that finger and toe webbing of metamorphs is equal
to or less than that of adults. Inhibitory versu stimulatory
modulation of iimb growth by hormones of the pituitary
and adrenal hormones is stage dependent (M. L. Wright
et al. 1994; also Elinson 1994). L. Muntz (1975) recognized four behavioral stages in leg mobiiity and muscle and
nerve development during leg myogenesis (also Dunlap
1967; Hughes and Prestige 1967; L. Muntz et ai. 1989).
Comparisons of her data on Xenopus to those from species
of Merent metamorphic patterns and ecology would be informative. &o, the ontogeny of pigment patterns during
limb development, although largely unstudied, may be mefui in species identifications.
i"
30
BODY PLAN
31
BODY PLAN
33
Fig. 3.4. Basic patterns of spiracular tube arrangement in anuran lar(Dendrobatidae). (B)
vae. (A) Single, sinistral, Dendvobates tiwononus
Single, sinistral with long spiracular tube, Otophynepybumi (Microhylidae). ( C )Dual, lateral, Lepidabatruchw LlanennS (Jiptodactylidae).
(D) Dual, lateroventral, Rbinophynus dorsalis (Rhinophrynidae).(E)
Single, posterior ventral, KahlapuLhva (Microhylidae). (F) Single,
midventral (on chest),Acaphw tmei (Ascaphidae).
includeAcrrs and Heleophvyne. Scaphzophvyne (Scaphiophryninae) has many odd features (e.g., jaw sheaths) for a microhylid tadpole, including a spiracle that is between midventral and sinistral. Representative spiracle arrangements are
shown in figure 3.4.
Because of differences in the pattern of fusion between
the opercular fold and body wall, the spiracular aperture may
face various drections and have different shapes and tube
codgurations. The different developmental patterns that
produce dual, lateral spiracles, a single medial spiracle at various sites, or a sinistral spiracle are understood in general,
but details of which tissues are involved and the Datterns of
formation among taxa are unclear (Inger 1967; Nieuwkoop
and Faber 1967; 0.M. Sokol1975; Starrett 1973). The inner or centripetal wall of a sinistral, paragyrinid, or midventral spiracle may be absent (e.g., Rrcaphm; phyllomedusine
hylids), present only as a partial or complete ridge, or present as the wall of a tube of various lengths that posteriorly
or terminally is free from the body wall with the posterior
tip free from the body wall (fig. 3.5A-D). The lateral wall
may end anterior to, at the same plane as, or posterior to the
insertion of the medal wall. The spatial limits of the spiracular walls determine the shape and orientation of the aperture.
In certain cases the aperture faces laterally and is commonly
smaller than the bore of the s~iraculartube.
Functional explanations to account for the Merent spir a d a r arrangements are few. Starrett (1973) suggested that
midventral (e.g., microhylid) or dual lateral (e.g., pipid) spiracles in suspension-feeding, nektonic species may allow the
tadpole to avoid disturbance of planktonic or particulate
food items. At least some of these forms can maneuver solely
by the force of the spiracular jet (Starrett 1973; personal obm a t i o n , several taxa). Wassersug and Viertel (1993) sugp t e d that folds in the inner walls of the long spiracle of
OtopiCnyne may provide elasticity t o modulate water flow.
Based on tadpoles raised from a single clutch of Stereoyclups
eggs,I. Griffiths and De Carvalho (1965) suggested that a
Vent Tube
An anus is the posterior opening of the mammalian digestive
tract. Amphbians have a common collecting chamber -a
cloaca-into whch the dgestive, urinary, and reproductive
tracts empty. The aperture through which feces exit to the
outside is not the anus in the adult and probably not in the
tadpole either. Without knowing more details of the development and origin, the use of proctodeum in association
with the vent is also debatable. For tadpoles, we suggest the
terms vent and vent tube in deference ;o the samelotation
(i.e., snout-vent length) used for frogs. See previous dscussions of why body and tail length measurements should not
involve the vent or vent tube as a landmark.
The digestive tract of a typical tadpole exits the abdominal cavity through a tube, the aperture of whch usually is
located in the sagittal plane and commonly associated with
the ventral fin (fig. 3.5). The location of the aperture usually
is consistent enough within taxa to be usefid for identhcation. The primary character states, recognized more than
34
BODY PLAN
35
36
sheaths that cover the jaws of tadpoles and the keratinized shape, as seen in tadpoles ofMegophvys. In tadpoles of the
coverings (= rhamphotheca) of the jaws of other animals hylid Scarthyla ( D u e h a n and De Sa 1988) and members of
surely are not homologs, we believe they warrant a distinct the Scinm ccowata group (e.g., McDiarmid and Altig 1990),
term and recommend "jaw sheath." The so called jaw sheaths the exceptionally short P-3 lies at the end of an armlike modfound in certain salamander larvae (e.g., Ambystoma and Si- ification of the medal part of the posterior labium that rests
ren) have not been examined hstologically, but they appear in a gap in the ventral papillae. The lower labium commonly
to differ structurally from either of the previous two cases; is larger than the upper labium and more of its area is free
although they overlie dermal bones, the specific bones in- from the body wall. Tadpoles of species with many tooth
volved are not entirely the same in larval salamanders as in rows have larger oral discs than those with fewer rows. The
other taxa. Also, the jaw sheaths of anuran larvae typically lower labium particularly may extend a considerabledstance
are not pointed and do not project, as is implied by the usual posterior to the last tooth row in some tadpoles (e.g., some
connotation of beak. Finally, the term "beak" has been used Ansonia, some Litoria, and Stauois). The labia consist of
to denote the prominent medal convex projection of the loose connective tissue covered with an epidermis of varied
margin of the upper jaw sheath of certain carnivorous tad- thtckness. Although the disc is more rigid in lotic than in
poles; this usage adds addtional confusion, and we recom- lentic forms, the structural modifications that contribute to
mend incised as more appropriate descriptive terms for this these differences in rigidity have not been determined. Aljaw sheath morphology.
though the cores of papdlae and bases of tooth ridges someThe conventional use of length to refer to the longer and times are pigmented, the face of the d s c usually lacks pig-,
usually longitudinal dimensions of a structure poses a con- ment, and mucous glands are absent. An inverted U-shaped
flict when describing jaw sheaths because their greatest di- depression or transverse slit commonly, perhaps always, ocmension is transverse. For convenience we retain length for curs within the medial gap of the anterior tooth row adjacent
the transverse measurement. This dunension is usually mea- to the upper jaw sheath. Neither the function nor developsured or described without considering curvature because it ment of this structure has been studied, and its occurrence
is the only measure that can be obtained without dissection. in those species with a complete proximal, upper row is
Jaw length as appropriate for a mammal (= gape, the basal not known.
Most commonly the oral disc has all but its anterior marterminus of the jaw sheath in a straight line to the peak of
the front curvature) has never been suggested as a measure- gin free from the body wall. In tadpoles with a dorsal gap in
ment for a tadpole, again perhaps because it could not be the marginal papillae, the upper labium essentially is a conmeasured on an intact specimen and because the jaw carti- tinuation of the snout; in species with complete marginal
lages do not articulate basally. By retaining length for the papdlae (e.g., suctorial forms) the entire margin is free. In
longest but transverse dunension and width for the shorter, some rheophilous Litoria from the Australopapuan region,
longitudinal dimension, jaw sheaths may be described and the snout and anterior margin of the oral disc are separated
measured as follows: long/short (transverse measurement), by a crevice that appears to be covered by a thin membrane
widelnarrow (basal boundary of keratinization to serrated (personal observation). The function of this morphology is
edge), and thicwthin (front, oral or adoral to back, buccal unknown but surely it signals a novel structure in streamor aboral surface). Thickness has not been examined in dwelling pelodryadine tadpoles as compared to streamdwelling tadpoles of neotropical hylids. The back of the free
many tadpoles.
The jaw sheath is only the keratinized part of the jaw portion of the oral disc, which is primarily in the lower lacovering and is usually pigmented. Descriptions should be bium, is typically smooth. In tadpoles of Ceratupblys, this
based only on the sheath and should not include jaw and surface is often fluted.
associated soft tissues. In those rare cases where the sheath
An umbelliform or upturned oral disc appears as a conis not pigmented (e.g., Scaphiophlyne), determining the lim- vergent trait in tadpoles of some arthroleptids, dendrobatits of the sheath is diicult. If the excised jaws of tadpoles ids, hylids, mantelline rhacophorids, megophryids, and miare placed in water, the jaw sheaths will detach (soon if speci- crohyline microhylids (fig. 9.5). Most umbelliform tadpoles
men not preserved, several days for preserved specimens) occur in the backwaters of lotic systems. Tooth rows and jaw
from their underlying cartilages, thereby facilitating de- sheaths are reduced to absent in these forms, and large
tailed observations.
ridgelike papillae that project radially from the mouth are
common. When present, marginal papillae are complete but
Oral Disc and P a p i l h
greatly reduced in size. Morphological comparisons among
The oral disc of a typical tadpole is round to transversely umbelliform tadpoles have not been made, but cursory
elliptical. The poorly delimited upper (anterior) and lower examinations show that both labia or primarily the lower
(posterior) labia of a M y formed d s c in nonsuctorial tad- labium form most of the disc. The bi-triangular disc o f M g poles are delineated by a fold that during closure (as usually ophvys is the most bizarre; when the tadpole submerges, the
occurs in preserved specimens) develops along a line that lateral, pointed flaps of the oral disc by their own elasticity
approximates the angles of the jaw cartilages. The degree to fold medally; when the tadpole rises to the surface to feed,
whch parts of the upper and lower labia contribute to the the flaps unfold to form a bi-triangular oral d s c with the
entire disc determines the disc shape. For example, enlarge- longer dimension oriented transversely. Even though funcment of lateral portions of the disc produce a bi-triangular tions other than feeding have been suggested for an umbelli-
BODY PLAN
'%
37
I I
R O N A L D A L T I G A N D R O Y W. M c D I A R M I D
38
BODY PLAN
39
40
and timing of these muscle contractions during a feedmg cycle are not clear, it seems that the muscles relax soon after
maximum oral dsc excursion and as closure begins (C. L.
Taylor et al. 1996). The m. intermandibularis posterior
(Gradwell 1972b) also may aid in tooth reorientation. Gradwell (1968) noted that the m. mandibulolabiahs is innervated by the trigeminal nerve. We suspect that lymphatic
spaces in and near the oral disc (chap. 5) also may function
in the operation of some of the mouthparts.
The number and arrangement of tooth rows on the oral
disc of tadpoles is species specific. The labial tooth row formula (LTRF) is a synoptic representation of this arrangement. A number of systems have been devised for numbering labial tooth rows and designating the rows with medal
gaps. Any system is clear to an experienced user, but many
systems are not obvious to a neophyte. To us, less cumbersome schemes seem to be more useful. Dubois (1995) and
Dubois and Ohler (1994) present the most recent variations.
Accordingly, we continue-to use the fractional designation
(e.g., Altig 1970) to spec@ the number and gross morphology of tooth row. Thls system accommodates all row configurations easily, does not use Roman numerals, has been
used for quite a long time and is familiar to many workers,
and takes less space than formulas that are written in spatial
order. Rows on the anterior labium are numbered distal (labial margin) to proximal (mouth). The notation "A-1" denotes the first anterior (most dstal from mouth) row, and
designations extended sequentially through A-n to the row
adiacent to the mouth. Rows on the vosterior labium are
numbered proximal to distal. The first row adjacent to the
mouth is P-1, and more distal rows are numbered sequentially through P-n. Notations such as "PR-1" and "AR-1,"
denoting the tooth ridge for tooth row P-1 and A-1, can be
extended for any anterior or posterior row if in developmental studies one wishes to refer to tooth ridges dstinct
from tooth rows. Rows with medial gaps are-designated
with parentheses, and rows that vary between individuals
(gap present or absent) are placed w i t h brackets. A gap in a
tooth row is a physical break in the tooth ridge and therefore
expressed in the tooth row; teeth occur only on tooth ridges.
Even apparent atavistic teeth are positioned on hillocks of
tooth ridge tissue (see below and fig. 3.7D). If the gap is
quite narrow, as it often is in row P-1, staining (see chap. 2)
may be necessary to discern if the ridge in fact is broken. The
absence of teeth on part (or all) of a tooth ridge should be
noted, but these breaks do not constitute gaps as defined
here. Also, sharp bends in tooth rows caused by flexures of
the d s c in preservation are sometimes interpreted as gaps;
one should open the oral disc manually to ver@ that a gap
probably is not present in most of these cases.
The functional and developmental considerations of gaps
in tooth rows have not been examined. These gaps may
allow larger excursions of the jaw sheaths during feeding;
adjacent tooth rows that have only narrow or no gaps perhaps signal smaller jaw excursions during feeding. We assume that most gaps are neither gained nor lost ontogenetically w i t h rows and that in most cases gaps
- - can be used to
evaluate row homology.
BODY PLAN
41
the tissue. What appears as a single long tooth with sequential light and dark areas are actually the replacement teeth
stacked in a series. Sometimes an older tooth sticks to a
newly erupted one and makes it appear longer than others
in the row, and other times a tooth looks longer because of
the dfficulty of interpreting the extent of the soft tissue of
the tooth ridge on the shaft. However, closely adjacent teeth
are comparable in size and shape. Tooth size may vary in
different parts of a row or in dfferent rows (e.g., fig. 3.7A,
I; Gosner 19-59), but the usual pattern is a gradual shlft to
smaller size laterally within a row and dstally among rows.
Smaller specimens have smaller teeth than larger specimens.
Meager data suggest that rows increase in length without
changing tooth density; where and in what pattern teeth are
added remains a mystery.
Most tadpoles have a single tooth row per ridge (= uniserial), but tadpoles with bi- (e.g., dscoglossids) and even
tri- or multiserial (fig. 3.7A) rows are known. Tooth densities of 30-100/mm, with higher counts in lotic tadpoles, are
typical, and the number of cusps range from 0 (simple spike)
to at least 18. Biserial sections in typically uniserial rows are
not uncommon. The teeth of Bombina orientalis are uniserial
at first appearance but become biserial during development.
Noble (1929) noted biserial tooth rows in Hopfobatrachw
rttgufosus, but the text and adjoining figure leave doubt if
these rows actually are biserial.
Tadpoles ofXenopus lamis develop true calcified teeth precociously (J. E Shaw 1979). True teeth usually appear late in
metamorphosis as the maxlllae and premaxillae ossify, but in
X. laevts, tooth buds are present at about stage 33 and start
to calcify at stage 37. True teeth begin to form at about stage
36 in tadpoles of Lepidobatrachw (Starrett 1973).
Jaw Sheaths
Jaw sheaths are formed by the fusion of palisades of keratinized cells along their lateral margins (Kaung 1975; Kaung
and Kollros 1976). Sometimes iaw sheaths have a striated
appearance to at least their basal parts. As the serrated edges
of the jaw sheaths wear away or break off, mitotic cells in
the base of the sheaths continually produce new cells that
keratinue in transit to the dstal edge. Typically, jaw sheaths
have a serrated edge, and the serrations vary in density, orientation (straight medially and angled laterally), presence
(rarely absent, e.g., Osteopilusbrunneus group; Noble 1929),
shape (broad-based and short vs. narrow-based and long),
and sue. In a few cases, 1-3 enlarged serrations occur withtn
44
L L
but neither have been described well. Wide infra- or suprarostral cartilages accompanied by narrow keratinized sheaths
occur, and the difference between this situation and one
where narrow sheaths cover most or all of the cartilages
needs to be qualified.
To visuahze jaw sheath shapes better, imagine a rectangular piece of paper with the opposite short ends placed on a
table so that the paper forms an arch that represents the typical smooth arc of the upper jaw sheath. The same concepts
pertain to the lower sheath, although it is more difficult to
simulate because the sheath is most often V-shaped. With
proper pressures on and repositioning of the ends, the paper
can be fashioned into various uniform (e.g., tall and narrow
vs. short and wide) or nonudorm (e.g., less curvature in
medial section) arches that effectively illustrate the known
variations in the shapes of jaw sheaths. The facing edge,
which equals the serrated edge of the sheath, can be cut to
form various uniform or nonuniform (e.g., incised sheath
with a medial convexity) borders. Also, various (uniform
and nonuniform) serrations that usually grade from the
largest medally to the smallest laterally can be cut into the
facing edge. The ends of the arch can be modified in shape
and lateral flexure to form the indstinctly differentiated lateral processes. Last, the roof (= front, oral, or adoral surface
of sheath) and ceiling (= rear, back, aboral, or buccal surface
of sheath) of the arch could be nearly flat and parallel, similar
to the paper, or could curve to various degrees. The line of
keratinization on the front face of the upper sheath typically
describes a smooth, either abrupt or graded, arc, but the line
of dark keratinization on the buccal face of the upper sheath
often takes various shapes (Altig and Johnston 1989) with
graded or abrupt margins. The lower sheath passes inside
the upper sheath during a feeding stroke, and through scissorlike interactions serrations on the two sheaths cut or
gouge surfaces for food removal. The degree of keratinization varies from weak (yellow to light brown) to strong
(dense black); other than color differences, there is no system for even subjective evaluation of these differences. The
cause or functional significance of light keratinization in
sheaths that normally are heavily keratinized is unknown.
Structures with melanic pigment are stronger than those that
lack h s pigment, but the strength and resistance to wear of
sheaths that differ in degrees of keratinization have not been
evaluated. Because of the way jaw cartilages articulate with
their supportive structures, jaw sheaths are oriented and operate at several angles. A wide variety of sheath shapes can
be seen in buccal view in Wassersug and Heyer (1988).
Other keratinized structures are associated with the oral
d s c and buccal cavity. A rounded, heavlly keratinized boss
occurs on the ceiling of the buccal cavity just posterior to
the buccal base of the upper jaw sheath in tadpoles of Spea.
Tadpoles of Kassina sengalensis, T~chobatrachusrobustus, and
several members of the Ranapipiens group, mostly with robust lower jaw sheaths, commonly have areas of thin keratinization lateral to the oral face of the lower jaw sheath. Although unclear, a comment by Annandale and Rao (1918)
suggested a unique feature of the tadpole of Euphlyctis hexadactylus: "There is a deep groove, with its sides and base
pun
BODY PLAN
Fig. 3.11. Photomicrographsshowing development of the oral apparaars in three tadpol~es.Top: Hyh s a y d (Hylidae), a tadpole with
jrw sheaths, reduced oral disc, and no labial teeth. (A) Jaw sheath visiblc, mvginapapillae starthg to appear, Gosna 24. (B) Distinct seratioason jaw sheaths and marginal papillae arc obvious, Gosna 25.
W:
G&qhtync &
d (Mimhylidae),a tadpole with oral
Saps and no keratinized mouthparts. (C) Oral disc relatively un&a&ad, conical adhesive gland visible in lowa lefi coma, Gosna 24.
@) Labial flaps beghmng to difkentiate, lower jaw (= idkhbial
pornincnce) visible as rounded projection in notch between labial
48
Oral Morphology
The functional roles that have been proposed for oral papillae fall into two basic categories: chemosensory and tactile
receptors and structures that control water flow (Van Dijk
1981), enhance attachment to substrates (Altig and Brodie
1972; Gradwell 1971a, 1975b), mod@ the shape of the oral
disc during feeding, and manipulate food and substrate particles. As is usually the case, few data are available. The size
and density of oral papillae in many cases seem to reflect lineages and habitats. For example, ranid tadpoles have larger
papillae arranged more sparsely than hylids, and stream hy-
BODY PLAN
49
50
been used infrequently in systematics analyses (e.g., Duellman and Trueb 1983, 1986; Grandison 1981; I. Griffiths
1963; I. Griffiths and De Carvalho 1965; Inger 1967; Kluge
and Farris 1969; 0. M. Sokol1975) and debated less often.
The lack of a clear phylogenetic hypothesis of some groups
surelv has exacerbated the situation. but cursorv examinations suggest to us that tadpole morphology commonly is
concordant with perceived taxonomic boundaries and perchance signals the need for closer examination of relationships (e.g., B u . debilis group vs. other B u f , Hyla leucophyllata group vs. other groups of hylids, Scinm yostrata vs. S.
rubva groups, Otophrynepyburnivs. other microhylids). Boulenger (1897:110) made a knowing statement in this regard:
"The structural differences which separate the genera and
species in their tadpole condition reflect, on the whole,
pretty accurately the system based on the perfect animals. . . ." Yet, even heuristic attempts to gain ideas on evolutionary patterns by overlaying larval traits on cladograms
derived from analyses of adult traits have not been done (see
chap. 4). Degree dfcommonness, at least as presently known
(e.g., a 213 LTRF in many g d d s and taxa), coupled with a
bewildering array of morphological diversity, makes the situation aooear
chaotic. Even so. inclusion of larval traits in
I I
phylogenetic analyses of anuran groups is essential. We are
not sure whether external or internal characteristics will
prove to be more informative, so we recommend investigators consider both. A few examples adequately illustrate the
need for much more work. J. D. Lynch (1971) considered a
LTRF of 313 or greater as primitive within leptodactylid
frogs, and Drewes (1984) noted that larger LTRFs belong
to the more primitive tava in hyperoliids. Noncusped teeth
have been considered primitive by Noble (1931) and derived bv Gosner ( 1959).
Al&ough devklopkental and functional data may help
define characters and their states, their inclusion in phyloeenetic analvses should be with caution. We are convinced
V
that understandmg the developmental morphology of a character often provides insight into character homology. For
example, determining the developmental history of a trait
across lineages may enable one to distinguish between instances of what appears to be the independent occurrences
of the same trait (homoplasy) and those that actually represent the occurrence of G o traits (apparent homoplasy).~
Altig and Johnston (1989) pointed out that patterns of
early development and metamorphic atrophy were informative'and suggestive of tooth row homoldgi. Based on data
from several sources (e.g., Dutta and Mohanty-Hejmadi
1984; Echeverria et al. 1987; Fiorito de Lopez and Echeverria 1984; Limbaugh and Volpe 1957; R. J. Nichols
1937; Thibaudeau and Altig 1988; Tubbs et al. 1993),tooth
rows in species with a LTRF of 213 commonly appear in
the developmental sequence of A-1, P-2, P-1, A-2, and P-3
(sequential formulas 110, 111, 112,212,213). Rows A-1 and
P-2 are closely linked during development and may appear
slightly reversed in time. Likewise, the first five rows to develop in species with LTRFs larger than 213 commonly appear in this sequence. In species with more than five tooth
rows, subsequent rows apparently are added alternately on
i
the upper and lower labia, but in at least four different patterns two of these are apparently common. In ranids, tooth
rows are added proximally on at least the upper labium,
whereas in ascaphids, heleophrymds, and hylids, additional
rows are located distally on both labia. Species with many
tooth rows (e.g., suctorial forms) attain the full compliment
much later in ontogeny and retain tooth rows further into
metamorphosis than species with fewer tooth rows (Menzies
and Zweifel1974; Nodzenski and Inger 1990). A thorough
evaluation of row homology is hindered by the paucity of
developmental series and the lack of understanding of how
medial gaps in tooth rows develop and evolve.
The rows in a 213 formula are designated the prime formula. In species with a formula greater than 213, the pattern
differences that were proposed to account for additional
tooth rows reauire that the orirne rows be renumbered once
the entire compliment of tooth rows is present. Based on
this observation, certain LTRFs should not exist. Of 124
species with fewer than 213 rows, 88 fit within the expected
categories of 212 (loss of P-3), 112 (loss of A-2), 111 (loss of
P-1), and 110 (loss of P-2) or 011 (loss of A-1). If homology
is assumed, LTRFs such as 012, 211, and 113 (common in
hyperoliids and African ranids) indicate the presence of
other patterns. The genetics of tooth row formation, and for
that matter of most other morphological characteristics of
tadpoles, essentially is unknown. Fortman and Altig ( 1973)
showed that F, crosses among species of Hyla from the
southeastern United States resulted in hybrids that more
closely resembled one parent than the other; seemingly
many traits acted as simple dominants. Crosses of Rana sp.
with LTRFs of 213 and 314 produced hybrids with a formula
of 214 (Haertel and Storm 1970; also see Kawamura and
Kobayashi 1960, Michalowski 1966). Although the relative
sizes of various mouthparts remain nearly constant throughout large parts of larval ontogeny (Gates 1983), the patterns
of growth of oral structures as they relate to feeding ecology
are poorly known.
Summary
The biphasic life cycle of anuran amphibians comprises two
quite different body plans on which selection can operate:
tadpoles and adults. The products of this selection especially
among the larval forms are amazing! As discoveries are made
and papers are published, one is coerced into believing that
the total morphological diversity of anuran tadpoles is nearly
endless. Except for the pelagic areas in a continually flowing
river or stream, there seems to be no freshwater habitat of
any duration that does not harbor tadpoles. Even though we
do not understand them well, numerous adaptations allow
tadpoles to live and feed in these various habitats. The distinctions between ecological forces and phylogenetic restrictions remain muddled in part because of the shortage of phylogenetic hypotheses within major clades of advanced frogs.
Throughout much of tadpole diversity, a tadpole is a tadpole is a tadpole: a simple, depressed body shape, dorsal
eyes, sinistral spiracle, marginal papillae with a dorsal gap,
and 213 tooth rows describes many anuran larvae. W i t h
ARCHITECTURE
Cranial and Axial
Musculoskeleton
David Cannatella
Introduction
Ovid's epic poem Metamorphoses chronicles miraculous
changes of all sorts-a boy is transformed into an eft for
offendmg Ceres, a statue carved by Pygmalion becomes a
woman, the eyes of the dead musician Argus are made to
adorn a peacock's train, and tadpoles metamorphose into
frogs. The Roman poet's view of tadpoles as ephemeral
stages is not unexpected, for even amphibian biologists do
not M y appreciate the significance of tadpoles as free-living
organisms. Tadpoles use the transient source of energy available in aquatic primary production, which is not available to
adults (Wassersug 1975); the larval stage provides the advantage of rapid growth in unstable environments. Being a
tadpole means that cranial morphology is canalized into
unique feedng structures at the expense of all else. The body
cavity contains mostly gut. The tail is emphasized over the
h b s as the instrument of locomotion. The reproductive tissue lies outside of the body cavity, so reproduction (and thus
neoteny) is not possible until metamorphosis, when the tad
is resorbed, the lunbs develop, and the body cavity enlarges.
Thus, except for sex, tadpoles engage in most of the same
activities as adult frogs- feeding, respiration, and locomotion- but in very dfferent ways. This chapter emphasizes
the structure and function of the musculoskeleton as it relates to these activities.
53
ARCHITECTURE
Caudata
Ascaphus truei
Leiopelma
Bombinatoridae
Discoglossidae
Megophryidae
Pelobatidae
Pelodytes
Rhinophrynusdorsalis
Discoglossanura
LA
Neobatrachia
Micrhylidae
Allophryne
Brachycephalidae
Bufonidae
Heleophryne
"Leptodactylidae"
Limnodynastinae
Myobatrachinae
Sooglossidae
~hiniderma
Hylidae
Pseudidae
Centrolenidae
Scaphiophryninae'
Scoptanura
Dendrobatidae
Hemisus
Arlhroleptidae'
'Ranidae"
The Chondrocranium
The first study of the frog chondrocranium apparently was
by Dug& (1834), who described and figured the larval
chondrocranium of Pelobatesfiscus; other literature on tadpole crania is summarized in table 4.1. Intertaxic variation
in the larval chondrocranium is &scussed below and in Haas
54
DAVID CANNATELLA
Fig. 4.2. Evolution of Orton's (1953) tadpole types under the assumption of unordered states, based on the
phylogenies of L. S. Ford and Cannateiia (1993), Haas (1997a), and Hay et al. (1995).
ARCHITECTURE
55
Table 4.1 Summary of iitenture concerning tadpole chondrocrania, muscles, and gi apparatus. Since t h s table was first compiled, similar compendia have appeared (Haas 1993, 1995, 1996b) that were of great help in updating the present table. Aii taxa treated in Haas (1996b) are also
iisted in Haas (1993). Some species names may be incorrect according to current taxonomy.
A&caphustmei
LEIOPELMA
Leiupelma archeyi
Lewpelma hochstetteri
BOMINATORIDAE
Bombina bombina
Bombina urientalis
Bombina variegata
DISCOGLOSSIDAE
A&es obstetncans
Discoglossus sardas
MEGOPHRYIDAE
Leptobrachium hasseltii
Megophtys montana
Megophtys nasuta
Megophtyspania
Megophtys robusta
Megophtys stejnegmi
PELOBATIDAE
PelobatesfiLscus
Pelobates syn6cus
Scaphiopus holbrookii
Spea bombtfions
PELODYTIDAE
Pelodytespunctatus
PIPIDAE
Hpnochims boettgeri
P i p canialhoi
P9apart.a
P@apipa
RHINOPHRYNIDAE
Rhinuphtynus donalis
ATOBATRACHIA
Heleophtyne natalensis
Heleophyepurcelli
.\IYOBATRACHINAE
Pseudophtyne australis
Pseudophtyne bibronii
Uperoleia lithomodu
LU'NODYNASITNAE
Limvwdynmtesperonii
Limvwdynbes tasmaniensis
Mixophyesfasciolatus
-LEMODACIYLIDAEn
Alsodes bawioi
Caudiverberamudiverbera
Ceratophtys comuta
Cwatophtys cranwelli
Cychamphusstejnegmi
Eiatherodactylus coqui
Eieutherodac~lusnubicoiu
Lepidobatrachus h k
Lepidobatrachw liunensis
I~ptodmtyluschaqwnsis
LLptodmtylus ocellatus
Leptodmtyluspentadadylus
Gradwell1971a, 1973; Haas 1995,1996b, 1997a, b; Pusey 1943; Reiss 1997; Van Eeden 1951;
Wassersug and Hoff 1982
N. G. Stephenson 1951b
N. G. Stephenson 1955
Goette 1875; Ridewood 1898b (as B. &teus); Severtsov 1969b
Haas 1997a; 0 . M. Sokol 1975; Wassersug and Hoff 1982
Haas 1995,1996b, 1997a
De Beer 1985; Haas 1995,1996b, 1997a; Kmjitzer 1931; Magnin 1959; Pusey 1938; Ridewood 1898a,
b; O. M. Sokol 1981b; Van Seters 1922; Wassersug and Hoff 1979, 1982
Kraemer 1974; Haas 1995, 1996b, 1997a; Pusey 1943; Ridewood 1898b; Schiosser and Roth 1995,
1997a, 199%
Pgener and Maglia 1997; 0 . M. Sokol1981b
Ridewood 1898b
Haas 1996b; h j i t z e r 1931; Ramaswami 1943
Haas 1995
Ramaswami 1943
Ramaswami 1943
Haas 1995
Dugs 1834; Haas 1997a; Luther 1914; Plasota 1974; Ridewood 1898b; Rotek 1981; Schultze 1888,
1892; Severtsov 1969a
O. M. Sokol 1975,1981b
Haas 1995
O. M. Sokol 1981b; Wassersug and Hoff 1979, 1982 (as Scaphwpus);J. J. Wiens 1989
Ridewood 189%, 1898b; 0 . M. Sokol1981a, b
O. M. Sokol 1959,1962,1977a
O. M. Sokol 1977a
Haas 1995; 0 . M. Sokol 1997a
W. K. Parker 1876 (as l? monstrosa);Ridewood 1897a, 1898b (as l? americana);Rozek 1989, 1990;
Rozek and Veself 1989
O. M. Sokol1977a, b (asXenupw)
Dreyer 1915; Edgeworth 1930; Gradwell 1971b; Haas 1995, 1997a; Kotthaus 1933; W. K. Parker 1876
(as Dadyiethra cnpensis);Paterson 1939a; Ramaswami 1941; Ridewood 1897a, 1898b; Sedra and
Michael1956a, 1957; Tmeb and Hanken 1993; Wassersug and Hoff 1979,1982; Weisz 1945a, 1945b
Haas 1995,1996b; Orton 1943; 0.M. Sokol1975,1977a, 1981b; Swatt and De S 1998; Wassersug
and Hoff 1982
Wassersug and Hoff 1979, 1982
Ramaswami 1944; Van Der Westhuizen 1961
C. M. Jacobson 1968
C. M. Jacobson 1968
Davies 1989
Haas 1996b, 1997a
W. K. Parker 1881
Kesteven 1944
W. K. Parker 1881; Reinbach 1939; Ridewood 1898b (as Calyptocephalmgayi);O. M. Sokol 1981b
Wild 1997
Fabrezi and Garca 1994; Lavilla and Fabrezi 1992
Lavilla 1991
Hanken et ai. 1992; Schiosser and Roth 199%
Lynn 1942
Haas 1995,1996b; Ruibal and Thomas 1988
Lavdla and Fabrezi 1992
O. M. Sokol l 9 8 l b
W. K. Parker 1881
Haas 1995,1996b
DAVID CANNATELLA
Table 4.1 umtinued
Odontophvynusachalemis
Physaiaemwpumlosus
Pleurodema bibronii
Pleurodema borellii
Telmatobius bolavianus
Telmatobiw ceimum
Telmatobiw mleus
Telmatobiusjelskii
Telmatobius latkps
Telmatobius cf. m a m a t u s
Telmatobiuspisanoi
PSEUDIDAE
Pseudisparadoxa
RHINODERMA
Rhinoderma ahtwt'nii
BUFONIDAE
Bufo cf. americanus
BufD amwr'canus
BufD angusti'ceps
Buf bufo
Buf %ntiginosusn
Bufo melanostictus
Bufo regulanS
Bufo cf. spinulosw
BufD p i d h
HYLTDAE
Agabchnh callidym
Anotheca spinosa
Cycloranaplapphala
F~ctonotusgoeidii
Gastrotheca espeletia
Gastrothecagracilh
Gastrotheca cf. manupiata
Gastrotheca manupiata
Gastrotheca orophylax
Gastmthecaperuana
Gnrtmtbecapse21stes
Gastrotheca riobambae
Hyla arbma
Hyla cinerea
Hyla laruzfomtis
Hyla microcephala
Hyla nana
Hyla pukcheh
Hyla rosenbergi
Hyla sguirella
Phnrmabyhguttata
Phyllomedusa boliviana
Phylhedusa sauvagii
Phylhedusa trinitatir
Pseudacris cru&
PseuMs regila
Scinat:acuminata
S c i m mbra
''WAE"
Amolops af8hana
Euphlyctis hexadaqlw
Hoploba&chus tigerinus
Occidazyga iuevis
Rana catesbeiana
Rana clamitans
Rana mrtipes
Rana ahlmatina
Rana esculenta
Rana cf.pipiens
Rana pipiem
Rana temporaria
Rana "whitehendi"
Haas 1997a
Schlosser and Roth 199%
O. M. Sokol 1981b
Fabrezi and Garca 1994; Wassersug and Hoff 1982
Laviiia and De Ia Riva 1993
Fabrezi and Lavilla 1993
W. K. Parker 1881
W. K. Parker 1881 (as Cyclmhamphw culeus, fide Ridewood 1898b)
Fabrezi and Lavilla 1993
Ridewood 1898b
Fabrezi and Lavilla 1993
W. K. Parker 1881; Ridewood 1898b
W. K. Parker 1881
Wassersug and Hoff 1982
Barry 1956
Haas 1995, 1996b; W. K. Parker 1876; Ridewood 1898b (as B. rmbaris)
Sedra 1951
Ramaswami 1940
Sedra 1950; Sedra and Michael1956b, 1958,1959
W. K. Parker 1881
O. M. Sokol1975
Haas 1995,1996b
Haas 1996b; Wassersug and Hoff 1982
Ridewood 1898b (as Chimleptes)
Haas 1996a
Haas 1996b
Fabrezi 1985; Fabrezi and Lavilla 1992
W. K. Parker 1881
Haas 1996b
Haas 1996b
Haas 1996b
Haas 1996b
Haas 1995,1996b, 1997a
Haas 1996b; Ridewood 1898b; Severtsov 1969a
Haas 1996b
De S 1988
Haas 1996b
Fabrezi and L a d a 1992
Fabrezi and Lavdia 1992; Lavilla and Fabrezi 1987
Haas 1996b
O. M. Sokol1981b
Fabrezi and Lavilla 1992
Fabrezi and Lavilla 1992
Fabrezi and Lavilla 1992
Haas 1996b; Kemy 1969a
W. K. Parker 1881 (asAcvispicken'ngi)
O. M. Sokol1981b (as Hyla)
Fabrezi and L a d a 1992
Haas 1996b
Ramaswami 1940,1943 (as Rana)
Ramaswami 1940 (as Ram)
Chacko 1965,1976; Ramaswami 1940 (as Rana)
Ridewood 1898b (as Oyglossw)
Gradwell 1968, 1970, 1972a, b; Starrett 1968
W. K. Parker 1881
Ramaswami 1940
Kratochwiil 1933 (as R agilh)
Ridewood 1898b
W. K. Parker 1881
Starrett 1968; Wassersug and Hoff 1979
De Beer 1985; De Jongh 1968; Gaupp 1893; Haas 1995, 1996b, 1997a; W. K. Parker 1871; Plasota
1974; Pusey 1938; Ridewood 1898b; 0 . M. Sokol1975; Spemann 1898; Stohr 1882
Ridewood 1898b
ARCHITECTURE
57
Trabecular horn
Okutomi 1937
Ramaswami 1938
Ridewood 1898b
Swanepoel1970
Laviiia 1992b
Wassersug and Hoff 1982
Haas 1995,1996b
De S and Tmeb 1991
O. M. Sokol1975,1981b
Starrett 1968 (as H. albooenter)
Ramaswami 1940; Ridewood 1898b
Haas 1995,1996b
Wassersug and Pyburn 1987 (as 0. vobwta)
Gradwell 1974 (as Phynomerrts)
Ramaswami 1940
Haas 1995,1996b
Haas 1995,1996b
Rtdewood 1898b (as Phyhbates)
De S and Hdl1998
Haas 1995,1996b
Haas 1995,1996b
Haas 1995,1996b
Haas 1995,1996b
Haas 1993,1996b, 1997a
,Trabecular
plate
Quadratocranial
,Trabecula
Notochord
Parachordal cart.
tebral neural arches. The occipital arch fuses to the rear end
of the skull.
Etbmoid Region
The anterior end of the primordial chondrocranium is elaborated to support the nasal capsuies and the larval jaws. Two
C
trabecuiar horns (cornua trabecuiarum) extend forward vent r d v and anterolateraiiv from the ethmoid = trabecuiar
plati, fig. 4.3). The trabedar horns articulati with, or are
fused to, a pair of suprarostral cartiiages (cartilago labialis
superior, superior rostral carulage), the skeletal elements of
th tadpole kpper jaw. In other gnathostomes, the functional
upper jaws are formed either by the palatoquadrate cartilage
or by a series of dermal bones (e.g., maxillae and premaxiiiae). In this region two ligaments, the quadratoethmoid
ligament (ligamentum quadratoethmoidale, I. cornuquadratum mediale; Van Der Westhuizen 1961) and the lateral circumoral ligament (I. cornu-quadratum laterale, I.
cornu-auadratum. I. circumoralis: 0.M. Sokol1981b) ioin
the ethmoid regi& to the palatocguadrate cartilage; sie'details below under Circumoral Ligaments.
The nasal septum (septum nasi; fig. 4.4) arises from the
trabecuiar dati and s e ~ k a t e sthe naial ca~suies.The nasal
capsuies ofllarvae u s d y are partidy forked spheres. The
roof of the nasal capsuie (tectum nasi) is confluent posteriorlv with the lamina orbitonasalis and is united to the seDtum nasi. The confluente of the trabecuiar horns joins the
ventral part of the nasal capsuie and forms the floor of the
nasal capsuie (solum nasi, trabecuiar plate, ethmoid plate;
O. M. Sokol1981b). The anterior w d of the nasal ca~suie
is the anterior cupola (cupola anterior).
The nasal capsuie is separated from the orbit by a w d , the
lamina orbitonasalis (planum antorbitale). The lamina orbitonasalis is confluent &th the tectum nasi anteriorlv and the
anterior end of the orbital cartiiage (via the sphenethmoid
commissure; see below) medidy. The muscular process of
the palatoquadrate is bound to the processus antorbitalis
(Haas 1995) of the larnina orbitonasalis by the ligamentum
58
DAVID CANNATELLA
teai, which has two parts, the I. teai superius and 1. tecti
inferius. These iigaments may be chondrified in some taxa to
form the cartilago tecti ("cartilago tectum" of Sokol 1975)
or comrnissura quadrato-orbitalis (Haas 1995). As metamorphosis begins, the cartiiages and olfaaory epithelium of
the nasal region become elaborated into a highly folded saclike structure; detaiis of these structures can be found in
R. S. Cooper (1943), Denis (1959), Higgins (1920), Jurgens (1971), Rowedder (1937), and Swanepoel(1970).
Ossifications associated with the nasal region include several well-known dermal bones and some neomorphic elements. The nasais form part of the roof of the nasal capsules.
The vomers are palatal bones that form the floor of the nasal
capsule; these are absent prirnitively in frogs (Cannatella
1985) and secondarily lost in several taxa. The septomaxillae
are generally small elements that are intimately associated
with the nasolacrimal duct but develop independently of the
nasal cartilages (De Jongh 1968; Jurgens 1971). Neomorphic elements, such as the internasals and prenasals in various taxa of casque-headed frogs (Tmeb 1973), appear relatively late in ontogeny (Trueb 1985). Hanken and Hall
(1984, 1988), N,E. Kemp and Hoyt (1969), Stokely and
List (1954), and citations in Trueb (1985) provided ossiication sequences in variou5 species.
Diversity. The ligamentum tecti was figured for Pelodytes
(O. M. Sokol1981b) andXenopush 5 (Sedra and Michael
Orbital Region
The lateral wall of the cranial cavity (cavum cranii) consists
of an orbital cartilage (cartdago orbitalis; fig. 4.4) that arises
from the posterior parts of the trabecular cartilages and the
anterior ends of the parachordal cartilages. The orbital cartilage is joined to the floor of the braincase by several cartilaginous pillars; in some vertebrates the orbital cartilage arises
as a discrete elernent, but it is not clear if this is so in frogs.
Pila antotica
T r o c . f
Oz!!om!?!orf.8,
ParEtal fen.
Taenia tecti rnedialis
Anterior semicircular canal
---.--
1 r
O
sem. canal
Posterior serni. canal
'~ugu1ar.f.
Operculurn
Stapes
Fenestra ovalis
Otic proc.
Quadratoethrnoid
Trabecular horn
Arcus subocularis
Lateral circurnoral
basitrabecular proc.
/ 1
I
Muscular proc.
Articular Droc.
I
Meckel's ca,laie
Ceratohyal
Infrarostralcartilage
Fig. 4.4. Lateral view of the chondrocranium of a Rana temporaria tadpole (13 mm body length). Abbreviations: cart.
men, fen. = fenestra, lig. = ligament, and proc. = process. Redrawn from Pusey (1938).
carrilage, f.
= fora.
ARCHITECTURE
The anteriormost of these piiiars is the preoptic root forming the anterior margin of the optic foramen and attaching
to the trabecula. In frogs and salamanders the preoptic
root forms an extensive cartilaginous waii between the optic
foramen and the sphenethmoid commissure; in caecilians
(M. H. Wake and Hanken 1982) it is more of a stmt. The pila
metoptica grows upward from the trabecula and separates
the optic foramen from the oculomotor (metoptic) foramen,
the latter for the oculomotor nerve (111), ophthalmic artery,
and pituitary vein. The pila antotica (pila prootica) arises
bom the parachordais and separates the oculomotor and
prootic foramina. A fourth, more transitory stmt, the pila
ethmoidaiis, forms the mediai was of the nasai capsules and
olfaaory canals (canales olfactorii, forarnina olfaaoria evehentia) and merges into the nasai septum (De Beer 1985).
Posteriorly, the orbitai cartiiage joins the otic capsules via the
raenia teai marginalis. Anteriorly, the sphenethmoid commissure conneas the orbitai cartiiage to the lamina orbitonas a h and the nasai capsule.
The orbitonasai foramen (foramen orbitonasaiis; fig. 4.4)
demarcates the lamina orbitonasalis from the orbitai cartilage; the p r o h d u s nerve (ophthalmic branch of V) passes
out of the orbit into the nasai cavity through this foramen.
The optic foramen (for craniai nerve 11)is the largest of the
foramina of the orbitai cartiiage and is located posteriorly in
the orbitai cartiiage. The oculomotor foramen (for cranial
rime 111)is smaer and lies just posterior to the optic foramen. The tiny trochlear foramen (for craniai nerve IV) is
k t e d dorsai to the two aforementioned foramina near the
raenia tecti marginaiis. The prootic foramen (foramen prooticum) more or less separates the orbitai cartiiage from the
otic capsule. The trigeminai (V) and faciai nerves (VII; from
the combined prootic gangiion), the abducens nerve (VI),
and the laterai cephalic vein (vena capitis lateralis) pass
rhrough the prootic foramen.
~s&catins in this retzion include the valatines and
sphenethmoid (orbitospheioid). The palatinis form along
the larnina orbitonasaiis and usuay extend from the maxilla
mediallv to near the midline. The svhenethmoid. usuav an
unpaired bone in adults, ossifies as paired elements along
the anterolaterai wa of the braincase anterior to the optic
foramen.
DAVID CANNATELLA
62
tive tissue that is associated with the processus posterior dorsalis of the pars alaris. Haas (1995) described the details
of its connection to the mandibulosuprarostral iigament
and the lateral circumoral ligament (iigamentum cornuq u a d r a m ) in dendrobatids. ~e noted its presence (apomorphic) only in T j ~ 4e tadpoles. I interpret its absence in
microhylid larvae ( T p e 2) as a loss. Its absence in pipoids
(Type 1) may aiso be a loss or may indicate that pelobatoids
are more closely related to Neobatrachia than to pipoids,
resulting in paraphyly
- . . of Mesobatrachia. Noble (1929)
claimed-that &e absence of the suprarostral cartilage was
characteristic of microhylid (his "brevicipitid") larvae. Starrett (1973) reported that the suprarostrai was lacking i11pipoid ( T p e 1) and microhylid (Type 2) larvae; t h s was
linked to her view that the absence of jaw sheaths was pleiomorphic for anurans. 0.M. Sokol (1975) pointed out that
all frog larvae have suprarostral cartilages; in Types 1 and 2
larvae they are firmly ankylosed to the trabecular horns. The
presence of keratinized jaw sheaths may be correlated with
mobility of the suprarostral. The posteroventral process of
the suprarostral (0.M. Sokol 1981b) is absent in Pipanura.
Alytes and DWcoglossus have long, distinctive, U-shaped corpora ( 0 . M. Sokol1981b). The lateral tip of the suprarostral
Diate LI Z n o ~ u uevis
s
fuses with the ~uadratoethmoidcartilage to form the tentacular cartilage, which supports the tentacle (Tmeb and Hanken 1993).
L
(De Beer 1926). Because of the position of the process relative to the palatine nerve, Pusey (1938) rejected the homology of the two conditions; the newer process and its postpalatine connection have been termed the pseudobasal process
(De Beer 1926) and pseudobasal connection (Pusey 1938).
Van Der Westhui7~n(1961) offered compehng evidence
that the basal process simply has moved from the basitrabecular articulation to a more lateral position on the otic ledge
to produce a postpalatine connection (commissure). Therefore, the basal and pseudobasal processes are homologous
(Pyles 1987; Reiss 1997).
As one proceeds anteriorly, the paiatoquadrate underlies
the orbit and in this region is named the arcus subocularis
(fig. 4.4). The wide gai that separates the paiatoquadrate
from the neurocranium is the subocular fenestra. The region
anterior to the a r a s subocularis is termed the quadrate
(O. M. Sokol 1981b). The most prominent part of the
quadrate is the muscular process (processus muscularis), a
flattened triangular process that curves dorsally and medially
and is the site of attachnient for the orbitohyoideus and suspensoriohyoideus muscles. The muscular process is bound
to the processus antorbitalis (Haas 1995) of the neurocranium by the ligamentum tecti (cartilago te& or commissura
quadrato-orbitalis when chondrified), which may be composed of two ligaments (see Ethmoid Region above), the
ligamenti tecti superius et inferius. Anteromedially, the
quadratocraniai commissure (figs. 4.3 and 4.5) rises dorsally
as a thick cartilaginous strip to join the quadrate to the floor
of the braincase near the ethmoid plate. On the anterior margin of the commissure is the s m d triangular quadratoethmoid process (processus quadratoethmoidahs) to which the
quadratoethmoid ligament (ligamentum quadratoethmoidale) is attached. A smail processus pseudopterygoideus
(Haas 1995) projects from the posterior part of the cornrnissure into the fenestra subocularis.
The hyoquadrate process (processus hyoquadrati) is a
condyle for the synoviai articulation with the ceratohyal
(figs. 4.4 and 4.7) and is located ventrally at the posterior
part of the quadrate region. The hyoquadrate ligament attaches to a ridge posterior to the hyoquadrate process and
binds the ceratohyai to the quadrate. The most anterior part
of the quadrate is the stout articular process (pars articularis
quadrati), which forms a synovial articulation, the adult jaw
joint, with the posterior end of Meckel's cartiiage.
During metamorphosis, the arcus subocularis, ascending
process, hyoquadrate process, and muscular process are resorbed as the paiatoquadrate rotates posteriorly (fig. 4.6).
The quadratocranial cornniissure is partly destroyed, but its
surviving part, with the quadratoethmoid process and processus m d a r i s posterior of the lamina orbitonasalis. forms
the pterygoid process (processus pterygoideus) of the adult.
Most of the larval paiatoquadrate disappears at metamorphosis, and some of its supportive function is assisted or
taken over by severai ossifications: m d a , p r e m d a , quadrate, quadratojugai, pterygoid, and squamosai.
The auadrate is an endochondral ossification that forms
in the similarly named region of the palatoquadrate at the
articular process, the point of articulation with the lower jaw.
An arc of the p r e m d a e , m d a e , and quadratojugals takes
ARCHITECTURE
Palatoquadrate
Infrarostral caltilage
Meckel's cartilage
Fig. 4.6. Four arbitrary stages in the metamorphosis of the paiatoquadrate of a generalized tadpole; lateral view. Arrow indicates direction
of metamorphic shift of the jaw elements. After Sedra (1950).
63
64
DAVID CANNATELLA
h e rJaws
The lower jaws consist of paired Meckel's cartilages and
paired infrarostral cartilages (infralabial cartilages, mentomeckelian cartilages) joined at the midline by connective
tissue (fig. 4.5). The infrarostrals are placed posterior and
slightly lateral to the suprarostrals. The two infrarostrals are
connected by a slender cartilage, the commissura intrarnandibularis (fig. 4.5). In Rana, a second, condylar articulation
is present ventral to the cornrnissura, but it is not synovid.
Although the infrarostrals have been termed mentomeckelian cartilages (0. M. Sokol 1975), the extent of these is
much greater than the mentomeckelian bones (J. J. Wiens
1989).
Meckel's cartilages are generally stout and shallowly
V-shaped; they are not associated with the lower jaw sheath.
The medial end of Meckel's cartilage generally bears a cotyle
for articulation with the infrarostral cartilages. The articulation with the pars articularis quadrati of the palatoquadrate
is saddle-shaped and subterminal; thus, there is a posterolaterally directed retroarticular process on which the suspensorio-, hyo-, and quadratoangularis muscles insert (0. M.
Sokol1981b). The articulation with the palatoquadrate has
a well-developed synovial capsule.
The bones associated with the lower jaw are the paired
angulars (angulosplenials), articulars, dentaries, and mentomeckelians. The endochondral mentomeckelian bone ossifies in the medial ends of the larval infrarostral cartilage. The
dentary and angular are elongate dermal bones that invest
Meckel's cartilage. The angular is posterior and medial and
the dentary anterior and lateral to Meckel's cartilage. The ar-
ticular ossifies endochondrally in the posterior end of Meckel's cartilage at the jaw articulation.
Diversity. The infrarostrals of R r c a p h are splintlike elements (Van Eeden 1951). In pipoids, the shape of the lower
jaw resembles the adult co~guration-slender and gently
curved. The angular ossifies earlier than in nonpipoid frogs
(0. M. Sokol 1977a; Trueb 1985). The infrarostrals are
fused medially in some microhylids (De S i and Trueb 1991;
0.M. Sokol 1981b) and apparently in Huplobatrachus tigerinus (Ramaswarni 1940). Fused infrarostrals (0. M. Sokol 1975) are a synapomorphy for Pipoidea. A syrnphysial joint later develops between the infi-arostrals during
metamorphosis, but mentomeckelian bones do not develop
in Pipoidea. Separate, so-called sub-meckelian cartilages are
known in Heleophryne (Van Der Westhuizen 1961), and
Alytes (called pararnandibularia; Van Seters 1922); these cartilages are not in the same position in Alytes o b s t (per~ ~
sonal observation) as in Heleuphryne.
B d Flow Muscles
Most of the cranial muscles of premetamorphic larvae are
found in the adult frog, albeit with different names at times.
However, all muscles are transformed during metamorphosis as the larval fibers die and adult-type fibers develop from
myoblasts (Takisawa et al. 1952a, b; Takisawa and Sunaga
1951). Gradwell and Walcott (1971) discussed the dual functional and structural aspects of these fiber types in the interhyoideus muscle. These muscles are summarized in table 4.2.
In a premetamorphic tadpole of Raw tempmaria at
Kopsch stage 25 (Kopsch 1952), the muscles of the buccal
Ceratobranchial IV
Terminal commissure
Fig. 4.7. Ventral view of the gill arch skeleton of a Rana catesbeiana tadpole. Symbols: dashed lines = lower
jaw. Afier Gradwell (1972a).
65
ARCHITECTURE
Table 4.2 Origins and insertions of selected cranial muscles in a Gosner stagc 35 tadpc)te of Ranacatefbeiam, modified from Gradwell 1972b.
Terminology is based on Ram t m p u r i a (Edgeworth 1935) as modified by Haas (1997a); CB = ceratobranchial.
Muscle
Origin
Insertion
Mandibular Group
-
Levator mandib~daeposterior
superficiaiis
L. m. p. profundus
L. m. anterior
I-. m. externus
L. m. a. articularis
L. m. a. subexernus
L. m. a. lateralis
Intermandibularis anterior
Intermandibularis posterior
Mandibulolabialis
Hyoid Group
Lateral part of ceratohyd
Orbitohyoideus
Suspensoriohyoideus
Interhyoideus
Interhyoideusposterior
Branchial Group
Levator arcus branchiatis I
I.a. b. I1
L. a. b. I11
L. a. b. IV
Constrictor branchidis I
C. b. I1
C. b. 111
C. b. N
Subarcualis rectus I, dorsal head
S. r. 11, ventral head
S. r. 11-IV
Subarcualis obliquus
Transversus ventralis IV
T>mpanopharyngeus
Diaphragmato-branchialisIV
LTnnarnedmuscle (Cucullaris?)
Lateral part of CB I
Lateral part of CB I
Anterior, lateral part of CB I1
Posterior, lateral part of CB II
Tenninal commissure of CB I and I1
Terminal Commissure of CB I1 and 111
Terminal Cornmissure of CB I1 and 111
Medial part of CB I
Medial part of CB II
Medial part of CB IV
Medial part of CB I1
Lateral part of CB IV
Terminal commissure of CB I1 and I11
Scapula
Spinal Group
Geniohyoideus
Rectus c e ~ c i s
Hypobranchid plate
Medial part of diaphragm; continuation of rectus
abdorninis
Infrarostral cartilage
Medal part of CB 11
ARCHITECTURE
67
in various taxa, but these are not apparent until near metamorphosis. Starrett (1973) reported that in microhylid tadpoles the intermandibularis posterior inserts on the basihyai
(copula 11) rather than a mediai raphe. She also reported an
infraiabial retractor muscle that joins the infrarostrai cartilage to Meckel's cartilage in microhylids. Presumably it retracts the lower jaw and closes the mouth. Starrett (1973)
speculated that t h s muscle was homologous with the mandibulolabialis of Types 3 and 4 tadpoles. In several species a
mandibulolabialis superior inserts onto the upper iip and a
mandibulolabialis inferior inserts onto the lower iip (Carr
and Altig 1991). The mandibulolabiaiis is apparently absent
in some Type 1 larvae; it is present in Gastrqpblyne carolinensis and Microbyla pulchra and absent in Hoplophlyne
rogersi and Pblynomantis (= Pblynomerus) annectens (Gradweii 1974; Noble 1929).
Gradweii (1972b, c) pointed out that the interhyoideus
posterior muscle (H3b in his terminology) occurs in Pelobates, Pseudis, Rana catesbeiana (contrary to Edgeworth
1935), and R. fiscigztla but not in Ascapbus, Pblynomantis,
pipoids, or Scapbzopus. Gradweii (1974) later diustrated and
described an extensive interhyoideus posterior in Pblyno-
ideus
Fig. 4.9. Ventraiview of the musdes of the jaws and branchiai apparatus of an idealized tadpole, based on Gradwell (1972a), with additions.
68
DAVID CANNATELLA
Table 4.3 Comparisons of the terminology of jaw muscles in tadpoles (adapted from Starrett 1968) of Edgeworth 1935, Starrett 1968, Luther
1914, Sedra 1950, and the terminology for adults from Edgeworth 1935
Edgeworth
Starrett
Luther
A. m. pterygoideus
Levator mandibulae anterior Adductor rnandibulae
anterior internus
A. m. anterior longus
A. m. posterior longus
L. m. posterior superficialis A. m. posterior
superficialis
superficialis
A. rn. posterior profundus A. m. posterior longus
L. m. posterior profundus
profundus
A. rn. posterior subexternus
L. m. anterior subexternus A. m. posterior
subexternus
A. m. posterior articularis A. rn. posterior articularis
L. m. anterior artidaris
A. m. externus superficialis A. rn. externus
L. m. externus
L. m. anterior lateralis
A. m. externus lateralis
Sedra
L. rn. anterior
Edgavorth (Adult)
Levator rnandibulae anterior
L. m. posterior
L. m. externus pars
anterior
L. m. externus pars
posterior
L. m. anterior lateralis
L. m. anterior subexternus
L. m. anterior artidaris
L. m. externus
L. m. anterior lateralis
70
DAVID CANNATELLA
ified drawing in which the pars posterior was no longer pres- to the insertion of the suspensorioanguiaris. The quadratoent, and he remarked that h s pars anterior was homologous anguiaris originates on the ventrolaterai aspect of the paiatowith the 1. m. externus and that the I. m. subexternus (pre- quadrate, is bounded laterdy by the bodies of the hyoangusumably his pars posterior) did not appear u n d stage 40 in laris and suspensorioanguiaris, and inserts on a common
Rana uztesbeiana. The distinction between the I. m. externus aponeurosis with the hyoanguiaris. These three muscles
and I. m. subexternus is particularly important because Star- form part of the depressor mandibulae of the adult.
rett (1968) defined character states for the levator muscles
based on the relationship of the mandibular branch of the Diversity. Starrett (1968) reported the occurrence of these
muscles in many taxa, but these data are inconsistent with
trigeminal nerve (V,) to these muscles.
The fates of the larvai mandibular and hvoid muscles of some other reports, including Starrett (1973). For example,
Bufi regularis, Rana temporaria, and Xenopus lmis were dis- pipoids have a single mandibular depressor muscle, the
cussed by Sedra (1950) and Sedra and Michael (1957). quadratohyoangularis, which is thought to represent fusion
Metamorphosis in Xenopus appears to be very different from of the three muscles ( 0 . M. Sokol1962,1977a); ontogenetthat in the other two taxa, but this may be caused by rnis- icdy, it appears as a single muscle in Xenopus laevis (Nieuwidentifications of certain muscles. Sedra and Michael (1957) koop and Faber 1967). However, Starrett (1968) reported
claimed to foliow Edgeworth's (1930) muscle terminology both the hyoangularis and quadratoanguiaris present in
for Xenqus lami, but their treatment is problematic. For ex- Xenopusgilli and X. l m i . The hyoanguiaris is said to be abi
1943; Starrett 1968) and Disample, they named the largest and most superficial of the sent inhcaphus ~ e (Pusey
mandibular muscles the 1. m. anterior and divided it into the coglosuspictus (Starrett 1968), but Starrett (1973) reported
I. m. anterior pars intermedius, pars lateraiis, and pars medi- it present in Type 3 tadpoles.
aiis. The 1. m. anterior pars medialis, on the basis of its toHaas (1997a) noted that the origin of the suspensorioanpography and its long, slender tendon, corresponds to the guiaris from the paiatoquadrate is behind the orbit in Alytes,
I. m. anterior ofRana temporaria. The 1. m. anterior pars in- Ascuphus, Bombina, and Discoglosus (state O of his character
termedius corresponds to the I. m. posterior pars super- 23) but in front of the orbit in Pelobates and Neobatrachia
ficialis, and the I. m. anterior pars lateraiis corresponds to (state 1). In pipids, he described the origin of the single anthe I. m. posterior pars profunda based on relative positions gularis muscle as from both the quadrate and the ceratohyai
and points of insertion; compare Sedra and Michael(1957) and coded the state as missing. Sokol (1977a) provided
to De Jongh (1968), Edgeworth (1935), and Gradweli greater detail on the origin of this muscle, but even so, the
(1971b, 1972b). Gradweii (1971b) d e d attention to this extreme distortion of the pipid paiatoquadrate precludes a
discrepancy, but unfortunately followed the terminology of clear assignment to either state. In Haas's tree (1997a: fig.
Sedra and Michael (1956a, 1957).
15) with charaaers optimized using accelerated transformaIn Rana, the 1. m. posterior profundus inserts on the su- tion (Swofford and Olsen 1990), state 1 is a synapomorphy
prarosuai cartilage. In pipids the suprarostrai is fused to the of Pipanura. However, the delayed transformation optimizatrabecular horns, and the 1. m. posterior profundus (mis- tion would suggest that state 1is a synapomorphy of Pelobanamed the I. m. anterior pars lateralis by Sedra and Michael toidea + Neobatracha.
1957) inserts on the cartilaginous base of the tentacle of Silurana tropicalis and Xenopus lmis (Gradweii 1971b; O. M.
Sokol 1977a); t h s muscle was aiso called the m. tentaculi Hyobranchial Apparatus
(Nieuwkoop and Faber 1967). In Hymenochirus boettgri, The ceratohyais and branchiai baskets (fig. 4.7) are the two
whch lacks tentacles, this siip inserts on the supralabial pad major components of the hyobranchial skeleton. The cera(O. M. Sokol 1977a), a transversely oval connective tissue tohyais and basibranchiai elements (copulae and hypopad that lies at the anterior edge of the ethmoid plate ( 0 . M. branchiai plates) are the pistons of the buccal pump that conSokol1962). Starrett (1973) tabulated differences in adduc- veys currents of food-laden water to the gdi filters and
tor muscles among Orton's four classes of tadpoles but more branchiai food traps and irrigates the respiratory surfaces of
the giiis. The branchiai baskets support the giii filters and
variation exists ( 0 . M. Sokol1975) than she reported.
gills. Water pumped posteriorly passes through the pharynJaw Depressor Muscles
geal slits, opercular c a v i ~and findy, the spiracle(s).
The hyoanguiaris, quadratoanguiaris, and suspensorioangularis, which are hyoid arch muscles innervated by the faciai Ceratohyals and Branchial Bashets
nerve (VII), insert on the retroarticular process of Meckel's The ceratohyals are the main levers of the pump upon which
cartiiage. The suspensorioangularis is a fan-shaped muscle muscle contraction aas. The ceratohyals lie anterior to the
that extends from the lateral aspea of the base of the muscu- branchiai baskets and are generdy oriented transversely. The
lar process and inserts via a short aponeurosis on the retroar- ceratohyais articulate with the paiatoquadrates by means of
ticular process of the lower jaw (figs. 4.94.10). The hyoan- the synoviai hyoquadrate articulations, which are reinforced
guiaris is cone-shaped and originates from the laterai aspect by a stout hyoquadrate iigament. The ceratohyals articulate
of the ceratohyal slightly ventral to the articulation of the with each other medidy via copula I1 (posterior copula,
ceratohyal and palatoquadrate cartilage. It inserts via an apo- copula posterior, basibranchial) and the interhyoid iigament
neurosis in comrnon with the quadratomgularis just laterai (iigamentum interhyoideum, iigamentum interhyale), of
ARCHITECTURE
71
72
DAVID CANNATELLA
ARCHITECTURE
'Table 4.4 Homologies of muscles of the branchial baskets, as described by various authors for specified taxa
.-
Edgeworth 1935
Ram
Pusey 1943
Ascupbus
Sokol 1975,1977a
Pipa
Subarcualis rectus I1
Constrictores
m u m
branchialium
(hsed)
(fused)
(fused)
Ceratohyoideus
externus
Interbranchialis I
Subarcualis re~tus111
Subarcualis recms I V
Subarn~alisrectus 1
Interbranchialis I1
S. r. IT-IV
S. r. I
Absent
Ceratohyoideus
internus
Absent
Ws
Levator arcus
branchiah I
Levator arcus
brachialis I
Constrictores arcuum
branchialium
L a. b. Il
L a. b. LII
L a. b. IV
L. a. b. 11
L. a. b. I11
L. a. b. N
.knt
Branchiohyoideus
externus
Constrictor
branchialis I
C. b. I1
C. b. I11
Subarcualis
rectu.9 I
Absent
(fused)
(fused)
Levator arcuum IV
Absent
Consmctor
branchialis I
C . b. II
C . b. I11
Subardis
r mI
5. r. II
S. r.
m +N
Tiam-ersus
venrralis II
Dqhragrnatobranchialis IV
Sot described
-bsent
-Absent
Subarcuales recti
IV and ?V
Subarcualis
obliquu%
11-IV and ?V
Diaphrapatobranchiah
Absent
Transversus
ventralis N
Absent
Absent
Haas 1996b
Gamtheca
Haas 1997a
Bombina
Levator arcus
branchialium I
Levator arcuum
branchialium I
L. a. b. TI
Laa. b. 111
L. a. b. N
L. a. b. I1
L, a. b. 111
L, a. b. IV
Absent
Constrictor
branchidis I
C. b. I1
Constrictor
branchidis I
C. b. I1
C b. 111
Branchiohyoideus
internus
Subarcualis rectus
C. b. 111
C. b. IV
S. r. I (dorsal
head)
S. r. I (ventral
head)
S. r. 11-IV
Transversus ventralis I1
Subarcualis
obliq uus
Subarcualis rectus
IV
Transversus
ventralis I1
Not described
Transversus ventralis IV
Absent
Diaphragmatobranchi alis
Tympanopharyngeus
Absent
Diapluagmatobranchialis
Tympanopharyngeus
Absent
Diaphragmatobmchialis
Absent
Absent
Absent
Laryngcobranchialis
Absent
Absent
Subarcualis
obliquus
m c e of this shift in attachment of constrictores branchiales but were named subarcualis rectus 11-TV. In reporting tlwee
II and IIIleads to the conclusion that the attachment of con- muscles in Xinopus, Gradwell (1971b) followed Sedra and
rtrictor branchialis I is part of a common pattern. Given the Michael's terminology but named them B2a, 2b, and 2c, as
rrature of their whole-mount preparations, it is not clear he did with the constrictor branchialis muscles of other nonakxher Schlosser and Roth (1995) were able to see the pipid taxa that he studied.
banchial arch or the artery, or whether they recognized the
Haas (1997a: fig. 13) also illustrated, but did not discuss,
significance of their muscle identifications.
three branchial constrictors in Oduntibvynus and Pelabates.
I have followed the new arrangement of Schlosser and The first of these in Odontophyus is labeled constrictor
RMh (1995) as promoted by Haas (1997a). The traditional branchialis 11, but the last avo are both labeled constrictor
amsnictors I, 11, and I11 are simply renumbered 11,111, and branchialis 111, an error in labeling (Haas, personal commun-:and the branchiohyoideus externus muscle (found in nication). Assuming the last muscle is in fact constrictor
ant)- a few frog species) is renamed constrictor branchialis I branchialis IV, its origin is correctly shown on ceratobranI @. 4.9; table 4.4).
chid I11 rather than TV as Haas (199%) illustrated forhcaHaas (1997a: fig. 13b) reported a short constrictor phus; this does not tnean that Haas's illustration ofhmphus
banchialis IV (sensu novo) in two specimens of leutphus, is incorrect. The attachments of the three constrictor muscles
similar in appearance to that described by Pusey (1943). in Oduntophrynus and Pelabates are almost identical to those
Hon-ever, Haas described and illustrated it attaching to the in Rana (fig. 4.9).
tnse of ceratobranchial IV rather than ceratobranchial I11 as
Haas's (1997a) phylogenetic analysis indicated that the
in Pusep (1943). Gradwell (1973) reported and illustrated absence of the constrictor branchialis I (sensu novo) was a
the same muscle (as R2c) on ceratobranchialII1 ofAscapbus. synapomorphy (character 19) for the ciade Pipanura. HowBixh Gradwell and Pusey reported that the muscle is ever, Haas did not include data from Smphiqpus or Spea, and
amached to the incipient branchial process at the base of Sokol (1975) reported that these larvae have the muscle (I
oaarobranchial 111and inserted into soft tissue rather than have verified &is for Speu bombzfions). If one assumes that
mto the ceratobranchial. Haas (1997a) reported this muscle
Speu is the closest relative of Pelabates (among the taxa Haas
&mt in Alytes, Bombina, and Disc~lassus.Pusey (1943) examined), then under parsimony optimization the muscle
ared its presence on ceratobranchial I11 in Dis~~lassus.must have reappeared in Spea. Clearly, a greater range of tax0.AI. Sokol(1975) erred in claiming that there was no con- onomic sampling is needed.
striaor (he termed these interbranchialis muscles) on cerato'bc;Lochlal n I in Types 1 and 3 tadpoles. Three constrictors Subarcuaiis Rectus, The homology of the four subarcualis
me illustrated in Xmpus hem (Sedra and Michael 1957) rectus muscles with those of other amphibians and fish is
74
DAVID CANNATELLA
particularly troublesome (Jollie 1982; Wiley 1979). In anurans these muscles extend more or less longitudinally, connecting each gill arch to the one in iiont. Subarcualis rectus
I connects the ceratohyal to the ceratobranchials, and subarcualis rectus 11,111, and IV span the ceratobranchlals.
Haas's (1997a) interpretation of subarcualis rectus I is
followed here. This muscle has several conformations. InAscapbus it has but one head. In some species (e.g., Bombina)
there are two closely placed slips that connect the base of
ceratobranchial to the ceratohyal. In other species the two
slips are more dstinct, and the deeper (viewed ventrally; fig.
4.9) dorsal head extends from the base of ceratobranchial I
to the processus posterior hyalis on the ceratohyal. The ventral head stretches &om the branchial process of ceratobranchid I1 to the ceratohval. These heads are so distinct as to
have been given different names (e,g., ceratohyoideus internus; table 4.4). Subarcualis rectus I is innervated by the principal ramus of cranial nerve LX (Schlosser and Roth 1975).
The remaining part of the muscle series, the subarcualis
rectus 11-IV, is a band of muscle extending across the proximal parts of ceratobranchials I-IN, as in Ascapbus. The compound nature of this muscle is suggested by the observation
that in Dism~lassussubarcualis rectus 11-IV is innervated by
the first, second, and (probably) the third branchial rami of
cranial nerve X (Schlosser and Roth 1995). In other species
(e.g., R a m temporaria) the muscle spans ceratobranchials
11-IV (as subarcualis reams 111-IV) or only ceratobranchials
III-IV (as subarcualis rectus IV,Haas 1997a).
The literature indicates general confusion about these
muscles. The subarcualis rectus 11,111, and IV of Sedra and
Michael (1957) are actually constrictor branchiatis muscies.
0 . M. Sokol illustrated a muscle in Pipa he termed the fused
subarcualis reaus 11-IS( but this appears to be the third
branchial constrictor (1977a: fig. 6). Subarcualis rectus
11-XV is absent inH-~emchiws
( 0 . M.Sokol1977a). Thus,
it seems that there is no verified subarcualis rectus 11-IV
muscle in pipids. In Rana the subarcualis rectus muscles disappear at metamorphosis.
arcualis rectus I might actually represent subarcualis obliquus I, whch is missing in frogs and salamanders. This muscle does not persist past metamorphosis.
Transversus Ventralis IV. Transversus ventralis lV is present in Ascaphus truei and salamanders (Gradwell 1973; Haas
1997a; Pusey 1943) but is not present in Rana catesbeiana
(Gradwell 1972b). Haas (1997a) reported that in Ascapbus
the origin is the proximal part of ceratobranchial IV and the
insertion is a median coimective tissue raphe anterior to the
glottis. Edgeworth (1920, 1935) reported that a poorly developed transversus ventralis IV (hyopharyngeus in his terminology) disappeared during ontogeny in young larvae of
Ram. tempmaria; he also (1935) reported it absent in P$a
pipa and Xenopus lamis. Sedra and Michael (1957) reported
the muscle present in Xenopus t m ? , and Gradwell (1971b)
fbllowed their usage. 0. M. Sokol (1977a) considered the
tranmersus ventralis nTof Silurana tropicalis and Xenclpus
Lamis to be synonymous with the tympanopharyngeus of
Pipa. Haas (1997a) believed that Sokol was correct in his
interpretation, and I follow his opinion here; in his data matrix only Ascapbus has transversus ventralis rV:Noble (1929)
reported a "hyopharyngeus" in Hophphyte, but its topography does not correspond to the transversus ventralis IV of
other taxa. The transversus ventralis IV does not survive
metamorphosis.
Tympanopharyngeus. The tympanopharyngeus muscle, as
described in Rana catesbeiana (Gradwell 1972b) and Pelabates@scus (Schulze 1892), extends from the lateral aspect of
ceratobranchial IV laterally to the tympanic region of the
otic capsule. According to Sedra and Michael (1957) and
Gradwell (1971b), in Xenupus the muscle extends from the
medial aspect of ceratobranchial IV dorsal to the dilator laryngis muscle to meet the fibers of its companion in a medial
raphe. In Pipa the tyrnpanopharyngeus originates medial to
the dilatator laryngis and inserts on the ventral surface of the
posterior pharynx (0. M. Sokol 1977a). Gradwell (1972b:
fig. 1) described and figured the tympanopharyngeus of
Rana catesbeiana as extendirlg from the otic capsule to ceratobranchial
essentiaUy following Schulze (1892). Haas
(1996b) gave the origin of the tympanopharyngeus in Gmtrotheca as the pharyngeal wall and the insertion as the pericardium and indicated that it was closely associated with the
levator arcus branchialis IV and the dilatator laryngis. The
descriptions presented by 0.M. Sokol, Sedra and Michael,
Gradwell, and Haas are somewhat different. However, Haas
(1997a) examined the muscle in a wide variety of frogs, and
I accept his conclusions about the distribution of this muscle; the tympanopharyngeus is absent in Alytes, Ascaphus,
Bornbina, Dism~lossus,and Ximpus and present in G ~ o t b e c a ,
Pelabates, and other neobatrachians but not Rana tmporamk.
In his analysis, the presence of the muscle (character 16) is a
synapomorphy of Pelabates + neobamchians but is reversed
in Rana.
Subarcualis Obliquus. The subarcualis obliquus I1 (transversus ventralis 11) is a stout muscle that extends from the
crista hyoidea of copula I1 to the branchial process in Rana
(Edgeworth 1935). Pusey (1943) argued, probably correctly, that Edgeworth's (1935) terminoloby was in error
and that this muscle should be called subarcualis obliquus
11. However, he pointed out that Edgeworth's transversus
ventralis IV was correctly labeled. Edgeworth (1920) had
earlier stated that transversus ventralis I1 was not present in
any amphibian, so his (1935) listing of transversus ventralis
I1 is curious.
Pusey (1943) also pointed out that only Ascapbus among
frogs has subarcualis obliquus 11-V. Muscles 111-V are a
fused series of slips that attach to the crista hyoidea and fan
out to insert on the medial portions of the ceratobrar~chials
and spicdum IV (Gradwell 1973; k e y 1943). Other frogs,
indudng Alytes, Bornbina, and ~ s c ~ l o s s uhave
s , only subarcualis obliquus 11, which Haas (1997a) referred to as the Diaphragmato-branchialis. The diaphragmato-branchialis
subarcualis obliquus. Haas (1997a) also speculated that sub- (IV) (diaphragmato-branchialis lateralis) extends antero-
ARCHITECTURE
75
DAVID CANNATELLA
Thyroid f.
Posterornedial proc.
(incipient)
osterolateral proc.
Posterornedial proc
Mentorneckelian bone
Ceratobranchials
Laryngeal sinus
Parahyoid bone
Posterornedial proc.
(bony)
Fig. 4.11. Changes in the hyobranchiai apparatus during metamorphosis in Peiudpespunctatus. (A) Dorsal view, tadpole with intaa mouthparts, h d limbs 1mm long; (B) dorsal view, rnetamorphosing
tadpole with rnouthparts absent and empted forelimbs, tail23 mm,
ment in adult Hymemchims and Pseudhymenochims (Cannatelia and Tmeb 1988a, b). In some pelobatoids (e.g., Pelodytes) fusion of the anterolateral process to the ceratohyal
forms a "lateral foramen" (Ridewood 189%) that is traversed by the glossopharyngeainerve and the lingual branch
of the carotid arterv. The anterolateral Drocess of Alvtes is
formed by adhsion of an autochthonous cartilage rather
than from the lateral margins of the hypobranchial plate
(Ridewood 1898a). In ali pelobatoids and in Rhinupbrynus,
the middle Dart of the ceratohval is resorbed in late metamorphosis (fig. 4.11) to produce a disjunct ceratohyal (Cannatelia 1985; Ridewood 189%). In contrast to Ridewood
(1898a), Pusey (1943) claimed that the fourth spiculum becomes the thyrohyal of the adult. In pipoid larvae the anterior processes of the ceratohyals are greatly enlarged and underlie aimost ali of the buccal cavity (0.M. Sokol 1975).
The vosteromedial Drocesses of the hvoid are ossified in
aii frogs. A parahyoid bone forms late in metamorphosis;
it is present prirnitively in Anura but lost independently in
different lineages (Cannatelia 1985). According to RideI
78
DAVID CANNATELLA
Spinal cord
eob
Rectus abdominis
atulomlntis
Obliquus aWor
exfernus superfciafis
Interarcualis
- , lnterarcualis
Anterior
Anterior
Dorsalls trunci
Middle
Middle
Coccygewacralis
Posterior
Posterior
DAVID CANNATELLA
80
Rana catesbeiana
Ascaphus truei
Xenopus laevis
~ i 4 .~~ 4. .composite
diagramsofsagirtaland parasagidsections
through the heah of hna
catM&cianu,Amphw ; andX
IatPis. Abbreviations and symbols: arrows = passage ofwater into the
buccal cavity, BC = buccal cavity, GC = @
cavity,
I and PC = pharyngeal cavity. Redrawn from Gradwell (1971a, 1971b, 1972b).
81
ARCHITECTURE
spout of Gradweii). The spiracle has no muscular or membranous valves in Rana. The lefi and right sides of the gi
cavity are conneaed across the rnidline by the opercular canal through which water passes fiom the right side, joining
the stream from the lefi, to exit the spiracle (fig. 4.15).
Within the gi cavity, there are four pairs of gis, each
consisting of a series of about 7-15 highly vascularized tufts
attached along a ceratobranchial in close association with
branchial arteries and constriaor branchialis muscles 11-TV
(sensu novo); no muscle is associated with ceratobranchial
N; Additiondy, the opercular cavity has a vascular iining,
the membrana vasculosa operculans (Gradweii 1969b).
Gradweli (1972b) discussed the association of the first gdi
clefi with a weii-vascularized operculum and the absence of
the clefi in taxa with a poorly vascularized opercular lining.
Haas (1997a) found the first gill clefi to be open (charaaer
30) in Pelobates and d but one of the neobatrachians he examined.
Gradweli (1972a, c) reviewed the literature on gi irrigation and pointed out that De Jongh (1968), Kenny (1969c),
and R. M. Savage (1952) recognized only a buccal pumping mechanism, whereas Kratochwill (1933) and Schulze
(1892) recognized branchial and pharyngeal pumps in addition to the buccal pump. The movements associated with gi
irrigation wi be considered in several sections that overlap
temporally: movements of the jaws, the buccal pump, the
\C&-
-D Hyoangulans
DAVID CANNATELLA
82
'
B m l Pump
The buccal oumo is the mechanism that draws water into
the buccal cavity of the tadpole. Its piston is formed by the
paired ceratohyal cartilages that underlie the floor of the bucI
orbnohyoldeus end
Suspensorbhyddeus
Inspiration
, - - ~ - ~
Expiration
Fig. 4.17. The visceral skeleton of a Ram catubciana tadpole. (A) Dor-
ARCHITECTURE
tologicaily distinct in that they are thicker and have peripheral nuclei; these pink fibers, with "slow" contrade propertia, many mitochondria, and phasic activity, are used
primarily in the regular contractions of giii irrigation. The
"adult" fibers are thinner, with centrally placed nuclei; these
white fibers, of the "fast" type with fewer mitochondria and
intermittent activity, are used primariiy in hyperexpiration.
The two types of fibers have different functions in the tadpole of Rana catesbeiana (Gradweii and Walcott 1971). It is
the more anteriorly located pink fibers of the interhyoideus
83
Orbitohyoideus
Hyoangularis
Suspensoriohyoideus
(Suspensorioangularis,
Geniohyoideus)
Geniohyoideus
(Constrictor branchialis 11-IV,
Subarcualis rectus 11-IV)
Hyoangularis
Suspensorioangularis
Orbitohyoideus
0.5 sec
Interhyoideus
Subarcualis obliquus
Interhyoideus
Subarcualis obliquus
Interhyoideus posterior
(Levator mandibulae posterior
L. rn. anterior, L. m. externus)
Subarcualis rectus I
Diaphragrnato-branchialis
(L. m. anterior articularis)
Fig. 4.18. Sumrnary of muscle activity and hydrostatic pressures during gill irrigation in Rana catesbeiana. Muscle names in parentheses
indicate that activity is postuiated, not observed. Symbols: dashed
line = typicai cyde of pharyngeai pressure, dotted line = branchiai cav-
ity pressure, open rectangles = data frorn anatorny and direa observation, solid line = pressure tracing of buccai pressure for severai cycles,
and solid rectangles = data from electromyography.Redrawn from
Gradweli (1972b).
84
DAVID CANNATELLA
well 1972c) indicate that both elastic recoil and contraction ment joining the crista hyoidea of copula I1 to the branchial
of the hyoidean depressors (orbitohyoideus and suspensori- process of ceratobranchiaiI1. Thus, during buccal floor eleohyoideus) depress the buccai floor for inspiration. The neg- vation, the ceratobranchiais are puiied fonvard and mediaiiy.
ative pressure draws water into the buccai cavity through the The movements are assisted by subarcualis rectus I, which
mouth. Sedra (1950) incorrectly judged that the hyoidean aiso assist in opening gill clefi I.
depressors lifi the buccai floor. The suspensoriohyoideus
aiso may help to stabilize the jaw joint during hyperinspira- Branchzal Pump
tory contraction othe hyoanguiaris muscle and to assist in Substantiai changes in branchiai cavity volume are only occaclosing gdi clefi I (Gradweii 1968, 1972a). During inspira- sionai and occur during hyperexpiration (figs. 4.184.19).
tion in Rana catesbeiana and R. Jsc@da (Gradweii 1972a) Contraction of the interhyoideus posterior muscle comwater flows in through the nares as weii, and a nariai vaive presses the opercular charnber, and contraction othe subarprevents egress of water during expiration (Gradweii cualis obiiquus (= transversus ventraiis I1 of Gradweii) and
1969a). Experiments using dye particles suggest that the lefi the normaiiy inaaive fibrdiar parts of the interhyoideus musand right currents do not mix in the pharyngeai and buccai d e elevates the buccai floor. Water is thus forcehlly expeiied
through the spiracle.
cavities (Gradweii 1972a) of these two species.
Gradwell (1968) found that denervation of the interhyoideus, orbitohyoideus, and suspensoriohyoideus muscles Pressure Dynamzc~
greatiy reduced ceratohyai osciiiations, but a siight rhythmtc Inspiration begins with elastic recoil of the buccai floor from
pumping was maintained. Bilateral denervation of the hy- an elevated position. The buccai pressure drops (fig. 4.18),
oidean depressors did not completely eliminate osciiiatory and as it approaches its minimum, the orbitohyoideus and
buccai floor depression caused by the continued activity of hyoangularis contract, actively depressing the buccai floor
the r e m s cervicis and elastic recoii of the buccai floor. De- and opening the mouth, respectively. Probably the suspennervation of the interhvoideus showed that buccai floor ele- soriohyoideus and suspensorioanguiaris aiso contract at this
vation persisted because of contraction of the subarcuaiis time. Just after buccal pressure reaches its minimum, the inobiiquus (transversus ventralis 11) and subarcuaiis rectus I terhyoideus and subarcuaiis obiiquus contract to begin the
.
the iigamentum te& (liga- expiration phase. The pharyngeai cavity is enlarged as the
(Gradweii 1 9 7 2 ~ ) Severing
mentum supraorbitale cranii and I. supraorbitale ethmoi- buccai floor is elevated and the ceratobranchiais are displaced
daie) caused the muscular process of the quadrate to bend anteromedidy. Probably the subarcualis rectus I and diaoutward, suggesting that these iigarnents stabilize the ori- phragmato-branchiaiis assist as weii. The mouth closes from
gins of the hyoidean depressors (Gradweii 1972~).
elastic recoil, and buccai pressure increases greatiy.
The osciiiations of the buccai pump are mechanicaiiy
At the peak of buccai pressure, the branchiai levators and
iinked with opening and closing of the mouth. When the reaus cervicis contract, constricting the pharyngeai cavity,
ceratohyai was held against the buccai roof, contraction of closing the velar vaive, and elevating the pharyngeai presthe jaw depressors opened the mouth only siightiy, and the sure. The resultant hydrostatic pressure is added to that just
jaws were not protruded as in normal mouth opening. When transrnitted to the pharym from the buccai cavity. Thus, wathe mouth was held open the amplitude of ceratohyai excur- ter is pushed further posteriorly across the giii clefis. Immesion was reduced.
diately after the peak of buccal pressure, the inspiration
phase begins again as the ceratohyals begin to recoii pasPharyngeal Pump
sively, the mouth opens, and buccai pressure drops. The phaMovements of the ceratobranchiais during irrigation cause ryngeai pressure drops as weii but lags behind the buccal
changes in the volume of the pharyngeai cavity; t h s consti- pressure curve. At the onset of inspiration the pressure in
tutes the pharyngeai pump. Simultaneous with buccai floor the branchiai cavity rises because of d o w generated by
elevation (expiration), anteromediai displacement of the compression of the pharyngeai cavity; this is the time of
ceratobranchids enlarges the pharyngeai cavity, and the gds greatest efflux from the spiracle. Most other workers have
are swept through the water in the gill cavity (fig. 4.19). This suggested incorrectiy that spiracular outflow is greatest durmovement is effected by contraction of the subarcualis obli- ing expiration (Gradweii 1 9 7 2 ~ ) .
quus (transversus ventraiis 11), which is synchronized with
that of the interhvoideus. When the ceratobranchiais reach
their fonvard limit, the buccai floor recoils passively, and the Evolutionary and Comparative Aspects
grlls are swept posterolaterally, reducing the pharyngeal cav- of Gil1 Irrigation and Feeding
ity. The spicules support the ventral velum against the buccal The mechanics of giii irrigation were studied in hmphus
roof and prevent backflow into the buccal cavity. Movement w e i (Gradweii 1971a, 1973), Bufo regularis (Sedra 1950),
of the ceratobranchiais occurs both by elastic recoii and ap- Hymenochiws boett~eri(0.M . Sokol 1962), PelobatesJscus
parentiy by contraction of the rectus cervicis and the (Schulze 1888, 1892), Phlynomantis annectens (Gradweii
branchiai levators I-R the apparent antagonists of the sub- 1974), Phyllomedusa trinitatzs (Kenny 1969c), various species ofRana (De Jongh 1968; Gradwell1968,1970,1972b,
arcualis obliquus.
Movements of the ceratobranchiais and ceratohyals are c; Kratochwdi 1933; Severtsov 1969a), and Xenopus laeas
synchronized to some degree by the subarcualis obiiquus, (Gradweii 1971b). Gradwell's studies of Rrcaphus, Phlynowhich in addition to contraction apparently acts as a liga- mantzs, Rana, and XencIpus provide consistent anatomicai
ARCHITECTURE
85
Inspiration
Tyrnpanopharyngeus
nares
/'i7
Rectus cewicis
Suspensoriohyoideus
Expiration
Levator rnandibulae
anterior articularis
'-F> Diaphragrnatobranchialis
obliquus
Interhyoideus
(Interhyoideus
posterior)
Fig. 4.19. Gradweii's model of the mechanics of gi inigation in Rana catesbeiana. Symbols: dashed white
arrows = direction of muscle action, gray area = pharyngeal cavity, and solid black arrows = water flow. The
musdes in this model clearly have conuacted or have elecuical activity during gi irngation (see fig. 4.14).
The interhyoideus posterior muscle is enclosed with parentheses to designate its activity only dunng hyperexpiration. After Gradweii (1972b).
DAVID CANNATELLA
Disengaged sucker
Peripheral contact
Engaged sucker
and evacuation of water frorn the sucker cavity into the buccal cavity
causes the oral disc to becorne engaged to the substrate. (C) During
inspiration, reduction in buccal pressure draws in water through the
nares, but the oral valve rernains closed and adherence to the substrate
is maintained. Redrawn from Gradweii (1971a).
iaw bv adduaor muscle contraction moves it fonvard. de- ryngeai force pumps that operate siightly out of phase. Unpression of the buccal floor increases the suction, and the like Rana, the pharyngeal pump is smaii relative to the bucbody is puiied close to the substrate, possibly by the rectus cai pump, and the outfow of water from the branchial
abdominis muscles. The combination of suction pressure chamber is intermittent rather than continuous. Although a
and friction of the lower lip may rasp aigae from &e sub- ventral velum is present, it is reduced and not completely
strate. Thus, "hitching" may aiso function sirnultaneously in free, and the dorsai velum assists substantiaiiyin maintaining
feeding. However, the labial teeth do not serve in anchoring unidirectional flow, &eAscaphus
and Rana. A large interthe tad~oleto the substrate (Gradwell 1971a).
hyoideus posterior muscle can simultaneously constria the
Tracings of buccai pressure and suction pressure are iden- buccal, pharyngeal, and gili cavities and may function in extical, and the frequency and amplitude of irrigation is similar peiiing detritus from the irrigation system. The flow of water
in tadpoles whether or not suction is engaged. The flow of from the midventral spiracle is intermittent, but because this
indicator ~articlesdemonstrates that when the sucker is en- tadpole is nektonic, there is no interferente from the subgaged, water enters the buccal cavity only through the nos- strate.
trils; when not engaged, water enters through both nostrils
and mouth. Nariai valves prevent reflux of water through Xenupus 1amG
the nostrils. As in Rana, there are both buccal and pharyn- The tadpole ofXenopuslua% (Type 1)has a simpler jaw sysgeal force pumps, siightly out of phase, with a velar valve tem than those described for Ascaphus, Phynomantis, or
that ensures the posterior flow of water over the gilis. Pres- Rana (fig. 4.14). Keratinized jaw sheaths and labial teeth are
sure in the gili cavity fluauates but is continuously positive, lacking, and the larva is obligately microphagous. Meckel's
indicating a constant flow of water from the branchial cavity. cartilage is elongate, as in the adult frog, and h e d to the
Unlike Rana, there is no interhyoideus posterior muscle in infrarostrals. The suprarostrals are fused to the trabecular
the opercular waii, so there is n branchial pump. Gradwei horns. This results in a wide transverse slit for the mouth.
(1971a) speculated that the single, midventral spiracular Many of the jaw muscles appear to be fused. &nupus larvae
opening maintains a constant oudow and prevents detritus aiso lack gilis and are obiigate air breathers, so it is inappropriate to refer to buccal pumping as giii irrigation. Gradwei
or parasites from entering the giii cavity.
(1971b) stated that the buccai pump is not active until the
Phrynomantis annectens
larva finds suspended food particles. Phasic pumping then
In contrast to Ascaphus and Rana, Phlynomantzs annectens begins, and the larva suspends itself in the water column.
(Type 2) is a midwater filter feeder and lacks keratinized jaw
InXenopus the mouth opens as inspiration begins, but the
sheaths and labial teeth. In the larvai stage, the external nares lower jaw is not protnided because of the nature of the jaw
have not yet opened (as in most microhylid taxa), so the only joint. Also, Meckel's cartilage is restricted to movement in
inlet is the mouth. As described for Rana, there is a jaw- the dorsoventral plane, like Phyrwmantis but not as in Ascaligament coupling such that both upper and lower jaws are phus or Rana. Correspondingly, the three depressors of the
protnided simultaneously. The intermandibularis anterior lower jaw are h e d into a single quadratohyoangularis. Unand mandibulolabialis muscles are absent. Unlike Rana, the like the ligament-dependent linkage of Rana, the quadratolower jaw rotates in only one plane and the suspensorioan- hyoangularis muscle provides the only force to open the
gularis muscle is absent (Gradwell1974).
lower jaw during buccai depression. The upper jaw does not
Like Ascaphus and Rana, there are cyclic buccal and pha- move during mouth opening and closing.
I
ARCHITECTURE
+-
GmtparatipeEcowholo~iGaland F~nctianal
Aspects @Buccal P m p i n ~
,ilthough the diverse ecologies of tadpoles have been appreciated, relatively little attention has been given to the relationship of ecology and the mechanics of buccal pumping.
Wassersug and Hoff (1979) devised a model by which they
estimated buccal volumes in a broad spectrum of tadpole
pi&:
Ranacatesbeiana, 50 p1; Ranasylvutica, 10.55 p1; and
Xmopus kvis, 14.7 p1. Negative allometry of body length
mith buccal volume among and within species suggests that
f h g structures impose a size limit on how big a tadpole
can get before it must metamorphose. The lever arm ratio,
the ratio of the projected width of the lateral part of the
ceratohyal (that part to which the buccal floor depressors
87
---
88
DAVID CANNATELLA
rous tadpoles were predicted t o require a large buccal vol- t o rocks. Slow-water stream forms such as Hyla lgleri and
ume to produce the single burst of suaion needed t o capture Rana boylii had a lower mean vaiue (0.30) than did pond
moving prey. In contrast, the feeding efficiency of micropha- generalists (0.44), but the three species of obiigate, suctorial
gous forms depends on the quantity of water passed through stream forms (Rrcaphus, Heleophryne, and Litoria) had a mean
the buccai cavity, and a larger buccal cavity wi increase food value of 0.44, not different from generalists. The small samintake. In bo& cases, b&cal volume i; increased, but in ple sizes may be inadequate to detect significant Merences.
different ways. Macrophagous tadpoles had a short angle of
These comparative studies were done before appropriate
ceratohyai rotation (stroke of the piston) and long lever arm methods were avadable for anaiyzing correlations among
combined with a large buccal floor area (bore of the cylin- continuous characters in an expiicitly phylogenetic context
der). Conversely, midwater suspension feeders had a large (Harvey and Pagel 1991). Apparent correlations among
degree of rotation and short lever arm, but a s m d buccal traits surveyed in a range of taxa may be artificidy high because a certain component of the covariation is attributable
floor area (Wassersug and Hoff 1979).
Like the carnivores, the benthic larvae examined had long to phylogeny. It wouid be instruaive to readdress these
lever arms and iittle rotation of the ceratohyal, but the buccal questions in an explicitly phylogenetic context with the apfloor, and thus buccal volume, was smaii. The large mechani- propriate methods. Reiiable information on tadpole diet and
cal advantage of long lever arms generates lar& negative ecology is also needed. Although macrophagous tadpoles
pressures at the suctoriai disc for adhering to the substrate have certain traits in conimon, the actual diet of these may
(e.g., hmphus; Gradwell 1971a, 1973). Because benthic vary greatly. Some are oophagous bromeiiad dweiiers (e.g.,
larvae presumably feed on periphyton on the rocks, large Anothecaspinosa; Lannoo et ai. 1987), while others are openbuccal volumes needed for either elusive prey or to move water predators (Hymenochimsboe~~eri;
0 . M. Sokol1962).
large volumes of water with tiny food particles were not ob- Other faaors, such as physiological constraints (Feder et ai.
1984a, b), merit consideration in generalizations concerning
served.
Tadpoles can effea a constant ingestion rate when food associations of diet, morphology, and function.
concentration is experimentaiiy altercci (Seale and Wassersug
1979). For suspension-feeding tadpoles, the rate of water Phylogenetic Aspects of Tadpole Morphology
pumping must be adjusted such that the g d iiters do not
become obstruaed; this can be accompiished by either am- Caenogenesis and Pipoid Tadpoh
plitude moduiation (AM) or frequency moduiation (FM) Frog tadpoles are caenogenetic (De Beer 1951; Gouid
of the buccal pump (Wassersug and Hoff 1979). In frequency 1977); they have deviated from the ancestral ontogeny in
moduiation the rate of pumping is adjusted, but each pump having larval specializations (nonterminal additions, such as
cycle transports the same volume of water (e.g., Xenupw keratinized jaw sheaths and labial teeth) and less obvious but
laevis). In am~litudemodulation the volume of the buccd e q u d y important skeletal modifications (e.g., orientation of
cavity is altered so that more or less water is pumped in one the palatoquadrate and presence of suprarostral and infraroscycle (e.g., Rana sylaatica). The type of moduiation appears trai cartilages). These larvai feeding specializations provide a
to be related to the feeding morphology. Forms with short way of prolonging the larval Me cycle (Slade and Wassersug
lever arms are prediaed t o have more difficuity in moduiat- 1975), and it may be that a reduaion in food is a cue for
ing the amplitude of buccal floor displacement than do those metamorphosis (Wassersug 1986).At metamorphosis, these
with longer lever arms. Xenopus h s , with a short lever arm, larval specializations are lost as the cranium of most tadpoles
is a FM tadpole, and R. sylvatica, with a longer lever arm, is is extensively remodeled (Orton 1957). Metamorphosis in
saiamanders, the outgroup, is relatively gradual, but phyloan AM tadpole (Sede and Wassersug 1979).
The muscles involved in moduiating either amplitude or genetic analysis indicates that the ancestor of Anura had
frequency of the buccal pump are primarily the orbitohy- drastic metamorphosis.
oideus (buccal floor depressor) and interhyoideus (elevator).
In Pipoidea, nearly ali of the skuii bones appear prior to
Satel and Wassersug (1981) prediaed that because macro- the completion of metamorphosis whereas in other frogs
phagous carnivores must generate a large suction pressure, several of the skull bones appear after metamorphosis (Trueb
they would have orbitohyoideus (OH) muscles that are large 1985; Trueb and Hanken 1993). It seems that the appearrelative to the interhyoideus (IH), or a low IH/OH ratio. ance of craniai ossifications is accelerated because metamorMicrophagous larvae have dense gi iiters that strain s m d phosis in these pipoids is not as drastic as in other frogs
partic&s &d were predicted to rec$re large buccal pressures (Wassersug and Hoff 1982) and less remodeling of the osand a large IH/OH ratio to force water through these filters. teocranium is required. Pipoids have several peramorphic
Quantification of muscle cross-sectional areas supported features (i.e., new morphologies or shapes that are added to
these predictions (Satel and Wassersug 1981). The cross- the end of the ontogenetic sequence; Aiberch et ai. 1979).
sectional areas were isometric to body length. Obiigate mid- Examples of such features are the fusion of the frontopariewater feeders (i.e., five species of microhyiids, Agalychnis tais in Pipoidea, fusion of the vomers in Xenopus, fusion of
callidryas, Rhinuphrynus domalir, and Xenupus hms) had the the parasphenoid to the sphenethmoid, expansion of the mehighest IH/OH values of 0.82), and macrophagous tadpoles dial ramus of the pterygoid, and an elongate columeiia in
such as Anotheca spinosa, Hymenochims boett~eri,and Spea Pipidae (Canriateiia and Trueb 1988a, b). In contrast, some
bombifions had a mean IH/OH value of 0.26. Suaorial forms features are interpretable as paedomorphic (i.e., developwere expected to have strong buccal depressors for clinging ment has been arrested at an earlier stage in the ontogenetic
ARCHITECTURE
T p e s 3 and 4 were the most derived, with T p e 4 more specialized than Type 3. These assumptions of the primitiveness
of pipoid larvae led to a historical controversy about hgher
level frog relationships because of incongruence of trees derived kom larval data with trees based on adult data. Studies
of adult morphology had concluded that "discogiossoid"
frogs such as Ascapbus, Bombina, and LeiqeImu, were the
most primitive anurans (1. Griffiths 1963; Noblc 1922).
This "larva versus adult" controversy was comparable to the
recent, but now obsolete, c'molecules versus morphologyn
debates.
Starrett suggested that the plesiomorphic mode of feeding was similar to that of the Type 1 (pipoid) larvae. Water
passing through the "beakless" mouth carries food particles,
which are filtered out, and a steady stream of water exits the
two spiracles. Feeding and respiration are the same actions.
Type 2 tadpole
Type 3 tadpole
Type 4 tadpole
*Separate branchial
chambers with median
external opening
Forelimbs develop close
to branchial chambers
Type 1 tadpole
\\
*Characters same as
Primitive tadpole
Prirni1:ivetadpole
--
Fig. 4.22. Starren's interpretation of the evoiutionary sequence of Orton's (1953) tadpole types. Characters
Redrawn from Starrett (1973).
89
DAVID CANNATELLA
90
The mouth is opened by the angularis complex and the geniohyoideus and dosed by the adductor muscles.
She further argued that in the Type 2 (microhylid) tadpole some separation of feeding from respiration occurs. A
strange, spoon-shaped lower lip is extended by the geniohyoideus and intermandibularisposterior. The lower lip and
mouth are closed by the infralabial retractor, interhyoideus,
and interhyoideus posterior. The evolution of keratinized
jaw siieaths in ~~~i
3 and 4 tadpoles contributes to the separation of feedng and respiration. The adductor muscles
move the jaws in a rasping motion. The labial teeth and papillae are controlled by opposing actions of the geniohyoideus and adductor muscles. The addition of a joint
between the infrarostral and Meckel's cartilage increases the
range of motion of the lower jaw. The intermandibularis
nosterior muscle has abandoned its ori~inal
function of as"
&ing the interhyoideus in buccal floor elevation and functions in feeding only.
This evolutionarv seauence suffers &om rwo ~roblems.
One is the misinterpretation of larval anatomical and functional data, and the second is the lack of a phylogenetic context. Starrett's statenlent that feeding and respiration are the
same action in pipoid larvae is incorrect. AU pipoid larvae
lack internal gills and are obligate air breathers ( 0 . M. Sokol
1977a; Wassersug 1996); thus the movement of water
through the buccal cavity serves no apparent (or a minor)
respiratory fiuiction. LXCmpus laePis tadpoles die if they cannot get air, even in highly oxygenated water (Wassersug
1992). Moreover, feeding in pipoid larvae is more diverse
.
larvae
than was represented by ~ k r e k x 1 9 7 3 )Rhinopbrynus
are known to be both carnivorous and microphagous (Satel
and Wassersug 1981). Silwana anddXbwpus larvae are obligtely microphagous. Hymenuchimcs boett$jni is a predatory
zooplanktivore and lacks gdl filter plates completely (0. M.
Sokol 1962), free-swimming Pipa larvac are macrophagous
filter feeders (0.M. Sokol 1977a), and the direct-developing Pipa species (Tmeb and Cannatella 1986) cannot feed
as larvae. I suggest that the diversification of heterogenous
feeding modes of pipoid larvae results from the complete
decoupling (sensu Lauder 1981) of feeding from respiration. When the buccal Dumn is freed from the constraint of
irrigating the giUs, its mechanical parts are then able to
evolve with the exploration of other trophic niches.
Some of Starrett's other statements ( i s , purported action of the geniohyoideus in opening the mouth and controlling the mouthparts, the muscles that close the mouth in
microhylid tadpoles, the action of the intermandibularis in
tadpoles with jaw sheaths, and a steady watcr strem exiting
the spiracles in pipoid tadpoles) are not supported by the
work of Gradwell (1968, 1971a, b, 1972b, c, 1973, 1974,
1975~).Other discrepancies were addressed by 0. M. Sokol(1975).
Starrett's (1973) proposal assumed that the simpler musculoskeletal system (lack of jaw sheaths and labial teeth,
fewer muscles and joints) of pipoid larvae is primitive for
Anura, following an implicit assumption that structural simplicity is plesiomorphic. It is well established that determination of character polarity must be based on outgroup com1
sways
ANATOMY
Viscera and Endocrines
Bruno Viertel and Susanne Richter
Introduction
An anuran larva is a nonreproductive, highly specialized
stage within the complex, amphtbian life cycle and not simply an extended embryonic phase that concludes with metamorphosis. A tadpole is a mosaic of organs that are either
remodeled (e.g., exocrine pancreas and posterior alimentary
traa; see Pretty et al. 1995; F. Sasaki and Kinoshita 1994;
Yoshizato 1992) or degenerated during metamorphosis
(e.g., blood-forming organs, flter apparatus, integumentary
ceiis, lymphatic system, and pronephros), remain functionaiiy quiescent (e.g., parts of the excretory and reproduaive
systems), or are functional throughout both larval and adult
stages of the cycle (e.g., liver, lungs, pancreas, spleen, thymus, and thyroid, and the vascular system). The nonreproductive tadpole feeds and grows to produce a metamorph
that has some probability of entering the breeding component of the population. In that context, much of the anatomy of a tadpole involves the gathering and processing of
food, and many of the structures used in these aaivities,
especiaiiy involving the buccopharyngeal area, are unique
among vertebrates.
We summarize the anatomical diversity of the circulatory,
digestive, respiratory, urogenital, and endocrine systems of
tadpoles. Much of the data available on these subjeas is derived from studies of only a few genera (e.g., Bufo, b n a ,
and Xenopus); when known, information on embryonic development and metamorphic changes is included. Additional information on some subjeas is found in chapters 3,
4, and 6.
We used the staging tables of the original authors; translations of selected staging systems to that of Gosner (1960)
are shown in table 2.1. The foiiowing staging systems are
cited in this chapter and are presented by the author name(s)
and the appropriate arabic or roman nunieral(s): Cambar
and Gipouloux (1956a, Bufo bufo), Cambar and Marrot
(1954, Rana dalmatina), Cambar and Martin (1959, Alytes
obstetricam), Gailien and Houhon ( 1951,Disco~lossuspictzls),
Gosner (1960, ali generalized anuran larvae), Nieuwkoop
and Faber (1956, Xenopus laePir), Rossi (1959, Bufa bufo),
Sedra and Michael (1961, Bufo rgularis), Shumway (1940,
Ranapipiem), and A. C. Taylor and Kollros (1946, Ranapipiem). The terminology we used in defining periods of development are as foiiows: embryonic = Gosner 1-24 (zygote
to closure of operculum); larval or tadpole = Gosner 2 5 4 6 ;
premetamorphic = Gosner 25-35 (growth of trunk and
tail); prometamorphic = Gosner 3 6 4 1 (growth of iimbs,
thyroxine titers increase), and metamorphic climax = Gos-
93
ANATOMY
H
C
Q++p
v
: ; &c
AKm
@: 4
V
RA
v
VA
Fig. 5.1. Development of the heart of Rana temporaria. Cross sections of (A) plate of ceiis that wiii form the
endocardium of the heart (Taylor/Koiiros stage 17),(B) dorsai mesocardium (Taylor/Koikos 18), (C) endocardium continuous with the endothelial lining of the aortic arches (Taylor/Koiros 18), and (D) septum
coni originating anteriorly as a continuation of the nght distal conai vaive (section through conus septum).
Three horizontal sections (E-G) from dorsai to ventral, interauricular septum developing from the anterodorsal w d (Taylor/Koiiros 24). Twisting of heart tube at early (H) and later (I) stages. Right lateral view of the
heart at Taylor/Koiiros 25 (J) and in the adult (K). Abbreviations: A = auride, AS = interauricular sepnim,
C = conus, DM = dorsai mesocardium, E = endocardium, EP = plate of ceiis that wiii form the endocardium of heart, LA = left auricle, LAT = left aortic arch, LDCV = left distal conai valve, M = myocardium,
P = floor of pharynx, RA = nght auricle, RDCV = right dorsai conai vaive, S = sinus venosus, SC = septum coni, SM = splanchnic mesoderm, V = ventnde, and VA = ventral aorta. Orientationai crosses: A =
anterior, D = dorsai, L = left, P = posterior, R = nght, and V = ventral. From Ison (1968); reprinted by
permission of Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
95
ANATOMY
terior cardinal veins are the afFerent renal veins). One of the flow into the anterior and only persistent ventral commistwo omphalomesenteric veins forms capiiiaries in the liver sural vessel and thereby drain the hind lirnbs and t d . The
and, passing caudaily, drains the intestine via the newly head-pharynx region drains via the external (especiaily the
formed portal vein; the lefi omphalomesenteric vein drains flter apparatus) and internal jugular veins.
the stomach region via the gastric vein. The posterior vena
cava arises anteriorly from the hepatic vein and posteriorly Blood
from the interrenal vein. A capiliary network connects the Turpen and Knudson (1982, Ranapz$iens) described hemaabdominal and musculo-abdominal veins. Blood flows pos- topoietic precursor ceiis in the late gastrula and early n e d a
teriorly via three ventral cornrnissural vessels to the inter- (fig. 5.6). Celi aggregates in these plates of precursor ceiis
renal vein, then to the hepatic vein (i.e., the posterior vena differentiate to hematic cords of the blood islands and oval,
cava), and from there to the sinus venosus. During meta- primitive blood cells. Precursor celis identical with common
morphosis, a blood sinus connects to the larval subintestinal plunpotent hematopoietic stem ceUs (PHSC; Broyles et ai.
vein (from the lefi omphalomesenteric vein) and forms the 1981 and Cltne and Golden 1979) migrate from the dorsal
adult abdominal vein; blood flows anteriorly, opposite to part of the lateral plates into the larval hematopoietic organs
that of the larval abdominal vein. Femoral and iliac veins (Broyles 1981; Turpen et al. 1979; Turpen and Knudson
..W'
..
,
Bulbus arteriosus
icle
\.
Ductus Cuvieri
+C
1
Subclavian vein
=-/I"
:-:.: . ,
\
\
_Ductus arteriosus
Externa1 carotid
'
// / tyC
artery
/
Pulmonary artery
Posterior vena cava
Hepatic vein
-:......:.. ............
. .. . . . ..:
.:. -.........
.... .:.::....:.
L
Ventricle
Right auricle
Sinus venosus
Fig. 5.2. Blood vascular systems of an early (A) and late (B) frog embryo viewed from the nght side. From
Rugh (1951); reprinted by perrnission of McGraw-Hi, Inc.
96
FA BRANCH III
FA BRANCH IV
TO SUBRECT III
SUBRECT 111
proteins (Mangia et al. 1970). The intertubular liver and hepatic ducts, pro- and opisthonephros, and spleen are primary
centers of hematopoiesis (Broyles et ai. 1981, R. catesbeiana;
G. Frank 1988,1989a, b, R. esculenta complex; Maniatis and
Ingram 1971a, b, c, R. catesbeiana (fig. 5.7). In Ranapipiens
(Shumway 24-25) and other species, hematopoiesis begins
ANATOMY
Fig. 5.3. Ventral views of the development of the aortic arches ofXeno-
97
"
T
OMR
ANAST
SUB
SUB
HEP
ABD
OML
MPC
MPC
DUOD
CAUD
GAS
. MP
ST
PVC
RAC
SUBC
ISCH
'OP
3,&
J[
"Pr"
...^ ..
.........
. . ..'..
.. '..... :.. .
:.:...
::
.......
....
.. . . .,...:
..
:. . ', ;.:.
<
,
I
ABD
COMM
CAUD -
"'
'
ISCH
RAP
Fig. 5.4. Development of the venous system ofXenopus laevis. Diagrammatic representation (not to scale) of the development (ventrai view) of the omphalomesenteric veins and hepatic portal system in (A) 5, (B) 6, (C) 6.5, (D) 7, (E) 8 4 0 mm larvae, and (F)
metamorph. Diagrammatic representation (not to scaie) of the development (vmtralview)of the postcardinal veins and posterior
vena cava in (G) 6, (H) 8, (I) 10, (J) 12, (K) 14, (L) 24-mm larvae, and (M) metamorph. Diagrammatic representation (not to
of the abdominal and hid limb veins in (N) 7, ( 0 ) 10, (P) 18-24, (Q) 37-mm larvae, (R)
scale) of the development (ventralh)
early metamorph, and (S) adult. Reconstmction of the alimentary canal and its blood vessels in (T) 6.5, (U) 8, and (V) 24-mm larvae. Abbreviations: ABD = abdominal vein, AC = anterior cardinal vein, AFF = afferent vein, AGAS = anterior gastric vein,
ANAST = dorsai anastomosis around gut, AVC = anterior vena cava, BRAC = brachiai vein, CAP = capiiiary network, CAUD =
caudal vein, COMM = commissurai vessels between abdominal and caudal veins, CUT = cutaneous vein, DC = duct of Cuvier,
DUOD = duodenum, EFF = efferent renai veins, FEM = femorai vein, GAS = gastric vein, GASD = gastroduodenai vein,
HEP = hepatic vein, IJ = internai jugular vein, INT = intestine, IR = interrenai vein, ISCH = ischiadic vein, LATV = lateral
vein, LPC = lateral postcardinal vein, MAV = muscularis abdominis vein, MESS = mesonephric sinus, MP = main portal vein,
MPC = mediai postcardinal vein, OML = left omphaiomesentericvein, OMR = right omphaiomesenteric vein, OP = opercular
vein, PH = phacynx, PItS = pronephric sinus, PVC = posterior vena cava, RAA = ramus abdominalis anterior (anterior anastomosis), RAP = ramus abdominalis posterior (posterior anastomosis), RECT = r e m , RP = renai portal vein, SOM = somatic
veins, ST = stomach, SUB = subintestinai vein, SUBC = subdavian vein, and SV = sinus venosus. After Miilard (1942);
reprinted by permission of the Royal Society of South Africa.
Dorsolateral
plate rnesoderm
Colonization of
Interstitial ;
, pronephros
migration
., Post. cardinal
Dorsal aortae
B-Lymphopoiesis (1)
Granulopoiesis (2)
Monopoiesis
'.,
'S.
II
(deterrnination) (4)
Gastrula
Ventral blood
island rnesoderrn
Stage
12 -14-
Viteiiine
veins
Circulation
/
~mbryonic
erythropoiesis (6,7)
Fig. 5.6. Postulated relationships and migratory patterns of hematopoietic precursor ceiis during embryonic development in Ranapiphns.
Dashed lines indicate events not documented experimentally. Stages
12-25 (embryonic period from gastnila to hatching) foiiow Shumway
(1940) and stage I (beginning of larval period) is of Taylor and
Koiiros (1946). Numerais in parentheses refer to the foiiowing refer-
Metamorphic climax
STAGE
15
(determination)
18-19
24-25
X-XII
XXI-XXI II
o---&-
Area of
anterior
presumptive
mesonephric
Ventral
0 0
islands
Liver pronephros
(mesnephros?)
,, ,,
PHSC
Primitive
RBCs
(Hb type?)
Mesonephric
Irnrnature
RBCs
$1%-4)
T Y P2~
(Hbs Td-1 , Td-2, Td-3)
stem ceiis, RBC = red blood cells, and Td-1 to Td-4 = hemoglobin
g l o b u h fractions. From Broyles (1981) and Turpen et al. (1979);
reprinted by permission of Plenum Publishing Corporation and Academic Press.
and dorsaie) are visible. The hemolymphatic system has separated into blood vessels and lymphatic vessels at Gosner 24;
lymphatic heart vaives are present, and lymphatic vessels and
lateral lymphatic sacs are present dorsaiiy and around the
eyes. By Gosner 25 (fig. 5.8) the vas lymphaticum caudaie
laterale (VLCL) and the trunci lymphatici laterales corporis
(TLLC)have appeared and paired ductus thoracici are
ANATOMY
VLS
,LLS
LLS
ALH
VLCL
VLCD
VLCV
101
ular ceils predominate (fig. 5.9A). Parts of the cortex are surrounded by connective tissue capsules, and blood capiaries
begin to penetrate the dorsoventrdy elongated m&s. The
increasing tendency of branching blood capillaries to push
through the cortex increases the blood supply, and this invasion forms lobes in the udand. In 25-27 dav-old larvae. concentric cytoplasmic striations found in a small nurnber of
these cells resemble those in Hassali's unicellular corpuscles
in the cvstic soaces
of the medda. Uniceilular and multicelI
lular Hassall's corpuscles are conspicuous in the m e d d a at
Tay1orF;ollros ni) from stages V-XVI, the organ increases
in size to a maximum of about 1 x 2.5 mm (J. D. Horton
1971a, b). The persistence of the thymus throughout amphibian development suggests a favorable reaction to thyroxine or synthesis of a hormone that counteracts thyroxine
(E. L. Cooper 1976).
i
102
Taylor/Koiiros 111. The most anterior lies mediai to the posterior corner of the eye, and two of the posterior pairs are
positioned half-way up the opercular w d (fig. 5.9B).Large
round or oval cells that resemble hemocytoblasts (Cowden
et ai. 1968)or monocytes (Rouf 1969)are concentrated in
the central region of the nodule connective tissue. Up to
eight pairs of ventral cavity bodies may develop by Taylorl
Koliros N.Six pairs are in the lateral and ventral opercular
chamber waii. Bodies positioned lateral to the heart and
ANATOMY
Kg 5.9. (A) (Rilular details of the dorsal region of the right thymus
16-day-old Ranapt@m larva (Taylor/Kollros 11). The cortex and
d u i i a are beginning to differentiate; smaJi lymphocytes can be recogrzed in the cortex; and paler staining, more irregularly shaped epithefLI cells predominate in the central, meduiiary zone. From J. D.
H m o n (1971b). (B) Ventral branchial region of a 68-day-oldRana
larva (Taylor/Kollros X) showing (low magnification) the location of a number of ventral cavity bodiis project&g from the ventral
md lateral opercular w d s (peribranchial chamber wds) of the right
side. The epitheiia of aii these nodules are lymphoid. The ventral cavity
bdies shown here are diffusely populated (i.e., central connective tisnie t-egions contain only a scattered array of leucocytes). Densely popuhtcd ventral cavity bodies are also found in leopard frog larvae i t mrious stages of development. From J. D. Horton (1971a). (C) Right
chymus of a 97-day-oldRanapip>iemlarva (Taylor/Koliros XXIII) showing (low magnhcation) the extent of this organ during metamorphosi. The ratio of meduiia to cortex has increased since earlier larvi life,
and rhe densely staining cortical zone with its mass of s m d lymphorrj appears lobuiate because of inwardly projecting connective tissue
~ p t aFrom
.
J. D. Horton (1971a). (D) The extent of the intembuiar
ephomyeloid tissue of the right opisthonephros of a 68-day-old
RaMppiew larva (Taylor/Koliros X). The section passes through the
more posterior part of the kidney whose ventral portion consists of a
mass of hematopoietic tissue. From J. D. Horton (1971a). AbbreviaWns: AC = auditory capsuie, C = capsuie, E = epithelial cells (ineguiady shaped), GA = giii arch-second branchial, HT = hematopoietic
-e,
MOW = medial w d of opercular chamber, MY = myotomal
m u d e , OC = opercular chamber (peribranchialchamber), SK = skin,
and SL = s m d lymphocytes. ~ e ~ r & t by
e dpennission of the Wistar
institute Press and AWmn Zwh&.
&-a
103
104
Sma accum~dationsof lymphocytes and granulocytes ap- larva. During metamorphic clunax, cutaneous arteries and
pear from Taylor/Koliros X in and around the blood capillar- veins increase in diameter, subcutaneous arteries and veins
ies near the g d s and branchial arches and in the posterior become numerous, and a second venous network is develpharyngeal cavity at the leve1 of, and medial to, the lymph oped in the form of anastomoses between the subcutaneous
gland. T h s tissue contacts the blood vessels in the region veins (De Saint-Aubain 1982, Bufi bufo and Rana temporaof the branchial arches and continues to grow until Taylor/ ria; also sec Strawinski 1956, Rana esculenta comph).
Kollros XVI. Du Pasquier (1968, 1970, Alytes ~ b s t ~ c a n r ) Merkel cells are found in R. temporaria from Cambat-/
found large accumulations of lymphoid tissue in the esopha- Martin 33-36 and in X. lamis during Nieuwkoop/Faber 49gus and smalier lymphatic iniltrations in the giiis, intestine, 50. These s m d cclls occur in the tail and body as well as in
lungs, and rncsentery. G. Frank (1988) showed the existente the tooth ridges of R. japonica and the barbels of &nopus.
of granulopoietic tissue in the mesentery and in the mesen- Synaptic contacts with nonmyelinated nerves (Whitear
chymal coat of the bile and hepatic duas in the larvae of the 1983) suggest that barbels may be mechanoreceptive.
R. esculenta complex. The mesenteric artery and arterioles are Membrane-bound Merkel granules originating from the
surrounded exclusively by granulopoietic tissue, and smaer Golgi complex and located dose to the synapses may contain
accumulations of granulocytes are attached to the bile duct. various components that are released into the cytoplasm
(Fox 1984; Fox and Whitear 1978; O v d e 1979; Tachibana
1978). Mitochondria-rich celis (Type A cells of Hourdry
Respiratory System
1974) in the tail and trunk (Ranatemporaria, Canibar/MarTadpoles use the general body surface, lungs, and pharyngeal tin 33/34) have a high concentration of microridges on the
organs for gas exchange. The low capacitance coefficients of apical pole and many mitochondria and may be stimulated
0, and CO, in water compared to air demand that a water by oxytocin (D. Brown et al. 1981). Type B cells Beaumont
breather ventilate 28 times as much as an air breather under (1970) also have a high mitochondrial density and microvilli
the same conditions (Prosser 1973). The ontogenetically and may transport substances (Alvarado and Moody 1970;
early differentiation of the lungs enables many tadpoles to Maetz 1974) or have an osmoregulatory function. They rebe air breathers. Gas exchange is effected automatically with semble die cldoridc celis of fish (Whitear 1977), but it is
the locomotory movcmcnts of at least the tail (Wassersug unclear whether Type B celis are precursors of flask cells of
1989a) if the body surface is used for respiration. Under adult amphibians (Fox 1985, 1986). Stij2chenzeLlen (= pin
some hypoxic conditions, some tadpoles use aerial respi- cells) found in the dorsal tail fin cpidermis of tadpoles of
Rana (CambarlMartin 28-29) but absent in adults are probration.
ably chemosensory (Fox 1985,1986; Whitear 1976). These
Integument and P@mentatwn
pear-shaped cells with microvilli on the apical poles are
The epidermis of premetamorphic Iarvae consists of an outer thought to contact nerve fibers.
periderm and an inner sensory layer (B. I. Balinsky 1981;
Mucous or goblet cells are known in X. laevzs (Gartz
Fox 1985; Gerhardt 1932; E. Marcus 1930). Numerous 1970; Le Quang Trong 1974; Pflugfelder and Schubert
populations of teus make up the larval anuran epiderrnis, 1965; Schneider 1957) andR. temporaria (Fox 1972,1988).
and considerable changes occur at metanorphosis (e.g., Ka- Leydig mucous cells (Leydig 1853, 1857; "clear cells" of
wai et al. 1994). Three epidermal layers occut during pro- Fox 1988) present during prometamorphosis are rich in tometamorphosis and about six cell layers are present after noflaments and sparsely populated with granular ER and
metamorphosis (Fox 1977, 1984). Epidermal cells are con- mitochondria. The mucous ceils that Elias (1937), Le
nected by tight junctions and desmosomes and have little Quang Trong (1973), Poska-Teiss (1930), and Sato (1924)
ultrastructural differentiation other than fiiarnentous and fi- described as Leydig cclls in the Bufonidae were classified as
brous structures (Fox 1977; Junqueira et ai. 1984, Pseds Riesenzellen (= alarm cells) by Fox (1988).The Akgelzelle (=
~aradoxa).Dense arravs of tonofilkents are associated with ball cell or unicellular gland; Meyer et al. 1975a, b) occurs
abundant a& filaments near the surface membranes of cells in high densities in Ascaphus twei until metamorphosis and
of the sensory layer. Collagen in thc basement lamella first uncommonly in X. luevis and Hymerwchims boettgeri (Frohappears in Raha temporaria-at Cambar/Martin 25. An adepi- lich et al. 1977; Meyer et al. 1975a, b). Pfeiffer (1966) called
dermal space with lameiiated bodies, the adepidermal mem- these ceiis Riesenzellen in the Bufonidae. The mucus of some
brane and collaeen fibrils of the basernent lamella form un- of these cells is acidic and extrusion is merocrine. Riesenzelder the membrane. This system is remforced by fibrils in the len, originaliy descnbed in Bufo bufo and B. calamita (Wenig
1913), that develop deep in the epidermis in young Xenopus
tail (Fox 1985).
Epidermal vascularization (subepidermal capiiiaries) is are not homologous to Leydig cells (Fox 1988). The rnusparse in premetamorphic larva. Head, back, and tail have cous cuticle is not an evaporation barner in larvae or aquatic
the smaliest capillary net mesh size and are therefore consid- adults but probably functions as an ion trap in larvae, aquatic
ered to be the most active respiratory parts of the body sur- frogs, and fishes (Friedrnan et al. 1967). Epidermal melanoface (De Saint-Aubain 1982, Bu$ bu$ and Rana temporaria). phores up to 500 pm in diameter form a network between
In general, the role of skin in gas exchange is not as signi- epidermal cells and are primarily involved in color change
ficant in larvae as one might expect from their large body (Bagnara 1972,1976; Nikcryasova and Golichenkov 1988).
surface. The capiilary net bccomes dense in prometamorphic Various immigrant cells (e.g., mesenchymal macrophages,
105
ANATOMY
B R U N O VIERTEL A N D SUSANNE R I C H T E R
ANATOMY
Digestive System
Most tadpoles are suspension feeders (Wassersug 1972), and
the flter apparatus enables them to trap a wide range of particulate food. Tadpoles lacking keratinized mouthparts fiiter
particles suspended in the water colurnn. Tadpoles with keratinized mouthparts scrape or bite food from the substrate
and fiiter the suspension. Many bottom feeders ingest periphyton, detritus and interstitial organisms from the sediment, and large quantities of indigestible material of different particle sizes (Seale et ai. 1982; Seale and Wassersug
1979; Viertel 1990, 1992, 1996).
The buccopharynx consists of the buccal cavity (anterior
buccopharynx) and pharynx (posterior buccopharynx). The
pharynx develops as a filter apparatus by integrating anterior
parts of the esophagus and lateral areas of epidermal eaoderm (Viertel1991,1996). Because of their position relative
to the visceral skeleton and because the buccal cavity and
pharynx cannot easily be distinguished from one another,
these components are coilectively referred to as the buccopharynx (fig. 5.1 1).
Wassersug (1976a, b) established the first comprehensive
anatomical terrninology and made broad comparisons (Wassersug 1980) among members of eight farnihes (also Lannoo
et al. 1987, Orteopilus bmnneus; Viertel 1982, 1984b,Alpes
muletensis, A. obstetricans, Bombina variegata, Hyh arborea,
107
Pelobatesfuscus, and central European Bufo and Rana; Wassersug and Heyer 1988, Leptodactylidae). Other investigators concentrated on the ontogenesis of the tongue (Hammerman 1965, 1969a, b, c, R. catesbeiana and R. chmitans;
H e H and Meiiicker 1941, R. sylvatim) or described the
developmental changes and chemoreceptive characters of
buccopharyngeal structures (Fiorito de Lopez and Echeverra 1989; Nomura et al. 1979a, b, R. japonica).
Authors from the beginning of the last century did not
realize that they were describing a fiiter apparatus. They lirnited their investigations to individual components (Dugs
1834; Huschke 1826; Maurer 1888; W. K. Parker 1881;
Rathke 1832), and Goette (1874, 1875) even rejeaed the
notion that the "internai giils" functioned as a filter apparatus. Oniy Rusconi (1826) and Boas (1882) realized that
they were investigating a fiiter apparatus. Informative descriptions by Kratochwill (1933, R. dalmatina), R. M. Savage (1952, Buf bufo and R. temporaria and several microhylids), and Schulze (1888, Pelobatesfuscus) form a bridge to
the view of this organ that has been established in recent investigations.
The first descriptions of the surface of the branchial food
traps examined by scanning electron microscopy (Wassersug
and Rosenberg 1979) included members of nine families.
Other papers that addressed the filter apparatus of speciic
species include the following: Das (1994, frogs from South
India); O. M. Sokol (1981a, Pelodpes punctatus); Viertel
(1984b, Alpes muletensis, A. obstetricans, and Bombina variedata); Wassersug (1984, compared Scaphiophyne with larvai
Types 2 and 4); Wassersug and Duellman (1984, eggbrooding hylid frogs), and Wassersug and Heyer (1983, leptodactylids living on wet rocky surfaces, Cycloramphusduseni,
Thoropa miliaris, and Tpetvopolitana).The first investigations
of the fiiter apparatus by transmission electron microscopy
were by Viertel (1985, 1987, Bombina variegata, Bufo buf,
R temporaria, and X. h s ) .
The mouth, buccal cavity, pharynx, glottis, and esophagus are arranged seriaiiy only during the embryonic stages
FPIV
MLB
EP
I
FP I1
~y
Fig. 5.11. Dorsolateral views of the alirnentary tracts of (A) Rana temporaria (Orton's larval Type 4, Gosner stage 36) and (B) Xenopus la&s
(Type 1, Nieuwkoop/Faber stage 54). Right, dorsal halves of the heads lifted and rotated and abdominal waii reflected. See table 5.1 for abbreviations. Redrawn frorn =ertel (1985, 1987); reprinted by perrnission of Springer-Verlagand Gustav Fischer Verlag.
ANATOMY
ST
STAGES 17-18
OS
STAGE 21
STAGE 23
0.3mm
the ventilation movements of the entire buccopharynx (also and the tongue aniage is flanked on both sides by infialabial
Viertel 1991). The lingual papdae, buccal roof arena papil- papillae (fig. 5.15). In the premetamorphic stages the tongue
lae, and buccal floor arena papiliae may function as chemore- aniage forms a transverse bulge that changes in position and
ceptors (Hamrnerman 1969a, b, c; H e H and Meiiicker form. In prometamorphic stages it becomes cushion-shaped
1941; Honda et al. 1992; Nomura et. ai. 1979a, b).
and extends along the longitu&nal axis. Lingual papdae are
The buccal floor begins posterior to the lower jaw sheath, differentiated on the tongue anlage during premetamorphic
ANATOMY
-,
P ~ ~ d u sPtycbohyla,
a ,
Rana esmlenta complex, and
112
ANATOMY
113
connection of ciliary cushion and fiiter plates is distinct; waii of peribranchial chamber united with pericardium and peritoneum. (E) Proximai parts of Mter apparam removed, posteroventral view; position of
ventral velum and dorsai velurn forming a slit; ciliary cushion and ciiiary groove (stipph)posterior to the dorsai velum. (F) Glandular zone
of the buccal floor arena of Bufi buf0 with mucus secreting seuetory
pits. Scale = micrometers. See table 5.2 for abbreviations. From Vierte1 (1985); reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag.
ANATOMY
115
ANATOMY
Kg 5.18. Filter apparatus of Ibzm t e m p s & (Gosner stage 32).
-2)Left branchial arch IT,lateral view; note close position of fitter
rvws and ciliary cushion and connection of branchiat food trap and
vumal
velum. (B) C*
cushion touching the fitter rows. (C) Set-
of filter rows.
Sm-e
a filter row.
Surface
d o n including ciliary and secretory cells. (F) Ciliary cushion
qxned, connective tissue supporting the ciliary cells. (G) Ventral
and velar papilla; position of branchid food trap, filter pLte,
& \ - e n d velum in posterior view; secretory ridges of brachial f w d
z n p s changing to typical secretory pits of ventral velum. h s e t g: Sec600of proximal ventral velum, cadaginous clasp supporn the thin
squamous epithelium and a large vacuolized secretory cell. (H) Dorsal
of ventral velum and velar papilla with a pattern of secretory pits.
1' Secretory pits of the velar edge, (J) Superficialsecretory p i s of the
mnn-d
side ofthe ventral velum swmunded by polygonal squamous
cprthelial cells. (K) Surface anatomy of branchid f w d trap. Inset k:
k f a c e of branchial food trap showing cells on a secretory ridge.
kale = micrometersexcept millimeters in (A).See table 5.2 for abbrevia&. From Viertel(1985); reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag.
+
'I
117
ANATOMY
Fig. 5.19. Fiter apparanis of Xnops k (Nieuwkoop/Faber stage
54). (A) Fiiter apparanis and buccal floor arena with views of ventral
velum, filter plates, and dorsal vela. Symbol: stipple = ciliary groove.
(B) Right side, anterior view of cross section at the plane of fiiter plate
III and branchial cavities I1 and I11 with epidetmis reflected. (C) Section of ventral velum showing different sizes of apicai ceii poles caused
by different exmision phases of mucus. (D) Ciiiary groove and dorsal
velum. Areas: Z1 = rim of squamous epithelium separating cihary
groove and lateral filter plate, 2 2 = ciliary groove (also shown in E),
23 = tramitional zone of ciliary groove and dorsal velum (also shown
in F), and 24 = dorsal velum with smooth epithelial cells (also shown
in G). (H) Epithelium at base of filter plate III;see asterisk in (B).
(I-J) Morphology of fiiter row. (K) Fiiter rows of the ventral region
with pustuiations at the base of a filter row. Scale = micrometers. See
table 5.2 for other abbreviations. From Vieael (1987); reprinted by
permission of Gustav Fischer Verlag.
119
first occurs and all larvai organs are present at least as an"
ANATOMY
Fig. 5.20. Cytology of the filter apparatus of Rana temporaria (Gosner
stage 32). (A) Cross section of ventral velum anterior to the velar
edge. (B) Cross section of the edge of ventral velum. (C) Longitudinal
section of the edge of ventral velum. (D) Longitudinal section of the
ventral side anterior to the edge of ventral velum. (E) Section of secretory celi. (F) Cross section of branchial food trap; secretory ceils
extendiig to the whole branchial food trap at SC1; squamous epithelial celis covering the secretory celis at SQC. (G) Cross section of
branchial food trap. (H) Transverse section of branchial food trap of
Eu$ bu$; secretory cells exposed plauily. Scale = micrometers. See
table 5.2 for abbreviations. From Viertel (1985); reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag.
of the area between the halves of the velum in the oral cavity.
Neither surface anatomy nor celi repertoire provides evidente of the origin of the ventral velum inX. laevis. The transition of endodermal celis to secretory ceiis SC1 is conspicuously similar to that in the ventral velum, transition zone,
and branchial food traps of larval Types 3 and 4. The arrangement of SC1 in rows also is strikingly similar to the
pattern in the ridged branchial food traps of Type 4 lamae.
It is therefore probable that the branches of the ventrai velum ofX. W s are homologous with the ventral velum and
the branchial food traps of larvae of Types 3 and 4. The previous description of the filter plates in larval Types 3 and 4
also applies to X. laevis.
The term "pharynx" warrants hrther discussion. The site
of the ceratobranchials shows that the anterior pharynx bes at the leve1 of the buccai floor arena. The ectoderm that
vaginates toward the aniagen of the iiter plates does not
belong to the pharynx any more than does the esophageal
tissue that penetrates the pharyngeal roof to form the ciliaty
cushions and ciliary groove. These structures penetrate the
embryonic p h a q m and contribute to the formation of the
filter apparatus. Relative to the origins and sites of the visceral skeleton, branchial nemes, and visceral musculature,
the original embryonic pharynx does not d i e r from that
of other vertebrate embryos (i.e., plesiomorphic vertebrate
pharynx). It is a supporting structure for the invaginating
epidermis and the esophageal endoderm; an eaodermalesophageal iiter apparatus has appeared.
If the anterior-posterior extension of the buccopharynx
in X. laevis is a plesiomorphic charaaer, then the buccopharynx may have evolved according to the foiiowing scenario.
A fold morphologically and ultrastructurally similar to the
ventral velum of lamai Type 3, but whose location is similar
to that of the Type 1 lama ofX. b i s , lirnited the posterior
extension of the buccai floor of the primitive anuran larva.
This primitive morphology gave rise to two lineages. In one,
the anatomical position of the buccopharynx was maintained, while the types of ceii present in the ventral velum
acquired their own pattern of differentiation and arrangement. This is the coniguration found in xenoanuran larvae
(Type 1; Starrett 1973). In a second lineage, the longitudinal
axis of the mouth-buccal floor-glottis was shortened, especially posteriorly, while the transverse axis of the buccal floor
was extended. Fewer celi types diierentiated in the buccopharynx than in the xenoanuran larval type. This is the
121
122
Fig. 5.21. Cytology of the filter apparatus of Rana tempmrh (Gosner smge 32). (A) Different conditions of
merocrime exmision in the ciiiary cushion. Inset a: Cilia on the ciiiary cushion. (B) Cross section of ciiiary
cushion. (C) Cross section of primary side fold of filter row. Scale = micrometers. See mble 5.2 for abbreviations. Frorn Viertel (1985); reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag.
ANATOMY
plates do not lend thernselves to cladistic analyses within anurans (0. M. Sokol 1975). Although quite Merent among
anurans, the supporting cartilaginous system also lacks characters usefd in a phylogenetic analysis. The esophageal derivation of ciliary grooves in X. laevts and of ciliary grooves
and cushions in the other species is not found in Dipnoi,
Urodela, or Gymnophiona and seerns to be unique to anuran larvae. Ciiiary grooves and ciiiary cushions therefore are
best considered as ~utapornomhiccharacters of anuran larvae, and their evolutionary origins should be considered
carefuliy. Does the different structure of the ciiiary groove in
Xenopus cornpared with the ciiiary grooves and ciliary cushions of Bombina variegata, Bufo calamita, B. bufo, and R. tempmatia allow phylogenetic conclusions?
Goblet celis are the typical secretory celi of the ciliary
grooves and ciliary cushions in these four species. InXequs,
goblet celis do not occur in the ciliary groove (or esophagus), and Type 3 and 4 secreto9 celis are present (Viertel
1987). There are two alternative explanations. (1) The ciliary grooves of all the species studied were derived frorn a
common anuran ancestral larva ("earlier stock" of Tihen
1965). This common character was rnodified structurally in
Merknt ways in Xenupus and other species, and the ciiiary
cushions were derived from the ciliary groove. (2) The ciliary grooves in Xenupus and other species (families) originated independently fi-orn the esophagus via convergence or
parallelisrn. In this case the ciliary cushions would be derived
frorn the esophagus.
The first alternative is supported by several other combrnon anuran larval characters, such as the positions of the
operculum (fold of peribranchial chamber) and spiracle(s)
and the simpiification of the rnouthparts rnodified in different ways in Xenupus and tadpoles of larval Types 3 and 4
(Inger 1967; 0. M. Sokol 1975; Then 1965). As for the
ciiiary grooves, these organs probably were inherited frorn a
common ancestor and rnodi6ed differentiv in the various larval types. As expected, corroboration of this alternative is
found in the dendrograms of frog farnilies (Inger 1967;
Trueb 1973) and the cladistic analysis of Dueliman and
Trueb (1986); a ciliary groove was f&d in a cornrnon ancestor for all anurans and subsequentiy modified in Xenupus
and other lineages. The alternative is corroborated by the
first hypothetical phylogeny of frogs of Inger (1967) in
which Pipidae and Rhinophrynidae (Type 1) on the one
hand and all the other families (and larval types) on the other
are derived independentiy from a common ancestor. In
other dendrogr&s by 1nier (1967), ciliary grooves would
have been derived independently three times, and in the
other hypothesized phylogenetic relationship (Dueliman
and Trueb 1986; Trueb 1973), four separate origins would
be expected for the species studied here. If it is presumed
that all anuran families developed ciiiary grooves, then seven
independent origins would be required. This high number
of independent derivations suggests that the first alternative
is much more probable than the second (see Ax 1984).
The ultrastructure and ontogenesis of the filter apparatus
of Type 2 larvae (Microhylidae) also is in agreement with
this discussion. Mucous cords are described by R. M. Savage
L
123
ANATOMY
,
F 3.22. Ontogeny of the iiter apparatus ofBufocahmita. (A) Left
Pih- ot'buccal floor arena, anlagen of iiter plates, and transient epiderd
(Gosner stage 21). (B) Lateral view of anlage of filter plates,
of rentrai velum, and transient epidermai giiis (Gosner early
22 . C ) Cross section of undifferentiated endodermal ceiis of the phaorgans (Gosner 21). (D) Cross section of the ectoderm covciq die nansient epidermal gis (Gosner 22) with mitochondrialah Tlpe B ceiis. (E) Site of anlage of iiter plates, transient epidermai
&aniage of persistent epidermai gills, and anlage of ventral velum
h e r lare 22). (F) Cross section of proximai base of transient epikmd
nith underlying endodermai celis (Gosner 22). Scaie =
znaometers. See table 5.2 for abbreviations. From Viertel (1991);
-qrinced b!. permission of Springer-Verlag.
125
ETZ
Fig. 5.23. Ontogeny of the iiter apparatus ofXenopus iuevis. (A) Cross section at the plane of the visceral pockets and the anlagen of transient epidermal @s (NieuwkoopJFaberstage 38). (B) Magnified cross section from
area in (A) of visceral pocket showing the sensory layer and endoderm. (C) Frontal section of left side of pharynx showing sensory layer and endoderm (Nieuwkoop/Faber38). (D) Paramedial section of the head region,
peribranchial chamber opened, anlagen of iiter plates sectioned (Nieuwkoop/Faber 42). Schernatics of TEM
section of anlagen of filter row, yo& endoderm overlapped by the sensory layer of the epidermis: (E) an early
hatchlig (Nieuwkoop/Faber 40141) and (F) an early tadpole (Nieuwkoop/Faber45). Abbreviations: AD =
aorta dorsahs, BII-I11 = branchial arches I to III, CT = connective tissue, Cn= = connective tissue ceii,
ENC = endodermal ceii, EIZ = ectodermal-endodermaitransition zone, EV = ear vesicle, FPC = epidermal
fold of peribranchial chamber (operculum),PC = penbranchial chamber, SL = sensory layer, SLC = sensory
layer ceii, TEG = transient epidermal gis, VA = visceral arch, VP = viscerai pocket, VPl = visceral pocket 1,
and W = yok vacuoles. From Viertel (1991); reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag.
ANATOMY
.'.'.
IIII
"."o:,
OO
Periderm
Sensory layer
Periderm
Blood
Sensory layer
Primordial cranium
.....::.., and visceral skeleton
:.:: . .
..
..::.
,de'
Neurai anlage
Muscles
.,$&
Chorda dorsalis
Epiderm
SensOr~layer
penetrating endoderm
[mmn
Endoderm
Mesoderm
128
r-
ciliary cushion
posterior of
buccal cavity
--------------
,_______
_ _ _- -_
- - - -_
= - - -_
- - - -_
- - - -_ _ _ _ _ _branchia
-
DV
: BRA
W-
: BFT+FP
.. .
-.r-----------
transition
coat of the transient ',
zone
and persistent gills ,'
.........................
BFA ,, '
.-------_-__-____---
endoderm
of esophagus
endoderrn
of buccopharynx
cells rich in yolk and lipid
endoderrn A
vacuoles
--------------
Fig. 5.24. Origin and morphogenesis of the filter apparatus. The filter
plates (ectodermal-endodermaltransition zone) and epidermal gis
form one branchia. The parts of different origins (i.e., ciliary cushions,
branchial food traps, and filter plates) are shown as a functional unit
for mucus entrapment and ciliary transport. Symbols: arrows indicate
V ~
t /
epidermis
'
CG FP
change in morphogenesis, the box endoses functional units for production and transpon of mucus, and dashed lines enclose unit of one
organ. See table 5.2 for abbreviations. From Vierte1 (1991); reprinted
by permission of Springer-Verlag.
1 w
PET
chamber
peribranchial
fold
ectoderm
cells flat and rich ir1 lipid
C U O ~and
~ S melanin granules,
some cells with cilia
/ CG
\
PCW
-+
2 mrn
I
FP II
EYEDVI
\
HY
ANATOMY
129
during metamorphic climax show that the manicotto glandulare is a typicai larva1 organ (see Carver and Frieden 1977
and Janes 1934 for further discussion of metamorphic regression of the gut).
Anuran larvae lack a pylorus, so the rnidgut begins irnmediately posterior to the manicotto and ends at the posterior
opening of the hepatopancreatic duct (fig. 5.264 C). This
Fig. 5.26. Form and function of the foregut in Rana dibunda. (A) Ventral view. (B) Foregut reconstruction; left, anterior half of gut tube removed (Shumway stage 22). (C) Ventral view of foregut (Shumway
25). (D) C i l i q patterns of the larvai foregut: (a) Ventral view of foregut opened along ventral midline and
edges reflected lateraiiy, c d q tracts in black, (b-e) diagrammatic cross sections at levels 1 4 in (a), and (f)
lateral view of foregut showing topographic relationship of the planes w, x, y, and z in (a). (E) Manicotto of
a larva (Taylor/Koiiros stage V). Numerals 1-6 = successive stages in the development of manicotto glands.
Abbreviations: B = manicotto-pancreatic bridge, C = manicotto crypt, CL = ciliated border of crypt opening, D = distal opening of hepatopancreatic duct, DP = dorsal pancreas, EP = esophageal plug, ES =
esophagus, F = foregut, G = gaiibladder, GC = gland cord, GL = gland lumen, GR = glandular rupturepoint in the epithelium, HP = hepatopancreatic duct, I = intestine, L = gut lumen, LB = left lung bud,
LV = liver, M = manicotto, MC = manicotto cells, OC = opening into manicotto crypt, OG = outer generative layer, P = pancreas, PH = pharynx, R = recurrent hepatopancreatic ducmles, S = secretory granules, SM = serosa and attenuated muscle layer, T = transverse septum, and W = ventral pancreas.
Orientation marks as in fig. 5. 1.After I. Grif5th.s (1961); reprinted by pemssion of The Zoological Society of London.
part of the second gut loop descends posterior to the manicotto and rises again anteriorly. The duodenum begins at
the orifice of the hepatopancreatic d u a and extends dorsay
to form a loop that descends on the right and rises on the
left. N. E. Kemp (1949, 1951) discussed how body shape
influentes the coiling pattern of the intestine (see Ichizuya-
Oka and Shimozawa 1990 for development of gut connective tissue). Two spirais are formed, and a fibrous or muscular rnfolding of the intestinal wa (i.e., typhlosolis; Ueck
1967; see Rovira et ai. 1993; Sesama et ai. 1995) enlarges
the anterior secretory and posterior resorptive surface of the
intestine, controls clearance time of food through the gut,
ANATOMY
causes a narrowing of the intestinal passage, and slows rnixing of the pancreatic enzymes with the food mass. The orifice of the hepatopancreatic duct lies next to the anterior end
of the typhlosolis. The lack of secretory digestive granules in
the duodenal ceils suggests that this part of the intestine does
not produce its own digestive enzymes but resorbs substances metabolized by pancreatic enzymes (Fox et al. 1970).
Typical duodenal celis are columnar, mitochondria-rich, microvdious, ciliated celis (Fox 1981; Fox et al. 1970; Jorquera
et al. 1982; Ueck 1967, Brwpus luevis, Rhinoewna danuinii,
and R. mfim). Calciform ceils have been observed in R. mfim. ~oncentrationsof lipid vacuoles are high during embryonic and early premetamorphic stages (Jorquera et al.
1982). The yolk and lipid vacuoles and the ciiia in Brwpus
disappear by Nieuwkoop/Faber 65.
The boundarv between the duodenum and the iieum is
indistinct. The ilium extends ventrdy in a left-handed outer
spiral and then from posterior to anterior in 4-8 counterclockwise coils (figs. 5.11-5.13). There are no diverticula,
villi, or caeca in the ileum; and the muscularis is thin. The
diameter of the intestinal tube and the thickness of the epithelium decreases posteriorly from 70 to 10 Fm. Goblet and
microvilious adsoritive cells are present, and endoreduplication is common (Ueck 1967). The iieum resorbs metabolites
digested by pancreatic enzymes, and the microvilious celis
probably secrete various enzymes (Ueck 1967). High catalase activity found (Daua et al. 1980, R. catesbeiana) in the
"anterior intestine" probably relates to the iieum. Enzyme
activity decreases during metamorphic climax and resumes
dter metamorphosis.
The colon (= rectum, coprodaeum) comprises the last
two loops of the intestinal spiral (Ueck 1967, X. luevis; figs.
5.11B and 5.13) and can be distingushed from the ileum by
its greater diameter. Intense enzyme activity and the presente of microorganisms in a characteristic layer near the epithelial celis suggest the symbiotic breakdown of plant celi
w d s . Symbionts are not found when larvae are fed only yolk
(Ueck 1967), and Piavaux (1972) found no evidence of cellulases in the intestinal tract.
The rectum is positioned longitudindy and dorsdy. Its
cuboidal, microvilious, ciliary celis (Nieuwkoop/Faber 47
X. laevts, Fox et al. 1972) indicate resorptive and transport
functions, especidy water (figs. 5.11-5.13). Microvdious
celis rich in mitochondria, smooth vesicles, and ribosomes
are found exclusively in the anterior rectum in X. laevik
(Nieuwkoop/Faber 47); during stages 54-58, they are present in the entire rectum (Fox et al. 1972; Ueck 1967).
The rectum, bladder, and ureters lead into the cloaca. In
contrast to the intestine from the foregut to the colon, the
cloaca is not exclusively endodermal in origin (B. I. Baiinsky 1981; Monayong Ako'o 1981). Mesoderm contributes
to the nephric ducts. In early larvae (Nieuwkoop/Faber 47),
the urodaeum, the dorsal orifices of the nephric ducts, and
the posterior proctodaeum are visible. The urodaeum is situated at the posterior margin of the coelom, and the proctodaeum is beyond the splanchmc w d of the splanchnotome
(Van Dijk 1959, Ascaphus tntei). In A. tntei (Nieuwkoop/
Faber 51) a ventral thickening of the urodaeum indicates the
development of the bladder aniage. This grows ventrdy, so
131
that an externally unpaired and internally divided, saclike extension is present by Nieuwkoop/Faber 56. The bladder remains externally paired at stage 58, and both parts have a
common comection to the ventral urodaeum (Van Dijk
1959).
The liver and gdbladder (fig. 5.26A, B, C) lie between
the two foregut loops and the midgut loop. The liver surto
rounds the manicotto and lies ventral and ~osteroventral
I
the trachea and esophagus. A large gdbladder is in the anterior region of the liver, often extending beyond the liver in
many species. The short neck of the gallbladder and the ductus cysticus lead into the bile duct, which courses laterally
along the liver margin and crosses the liver posteriorly. At
the pancreas, the bile duct foliows the course of the two pancreatic duas for a short distance before all three duas merge
to form the he~ato~ancreatic
duct.
The development of the liver begins as a ventromedial
diverticulum of the midgut aniage between the heart and duodenum aniagen (Nieuwkoop/Faber 35-36, Xenopus luevis).
The pocketlike primary hepatic cavity corresponds with the
gut cavity and has an outlet into the submesodermal space.
Anterior diverticular folds appear and narrow d but the posterior region of the hepatic cavity (Nieuwkoop/Faber 3740). At the same time, the area comected to the midgut narrows and forms the bile duct (Nieuwkoop/Faber 41). The
remaining parts of the primary hepatic cavity form the main
hepatic duas that transport bile from the liver to the g d bladder. Rernnants of the primary liver cavity form the g d bladder and ductus cysticus (B. I. Balinsky 1981; Nieuwk o o and
~ Faber 1956).
fiolds of the anterkr diverticulum break into strands of
ceils corresponding to the primary hepatic cavity that are traversed by blood vessels and the sinuses of the viteliine veins
(B. I. Baiinsky 1981). The basic histological organization of
the larval (and adult) liver consists of a parenchymatic frame
of hepatocytes with an imer surface lined by endothelial and
Kupffer ceils. The perisinusoidal space (= space of Disse)
lined by endothelial celis lies between the hepatocytes and
the endothelial ceils.
Precursor celis of liver parenchyma are arranged in
strands, rich in yolk and lipid vacuoles, held together by desmosomes. and often undergo
" mitosis. These celis form lobules, and the enclosed interceilular space becomes a bile capiilary. The celis increase in size, there is a marked increase in
cristate mitochondria (yolk mitochondria), and some rough
ER is present (Gosner 20-23). The yolk content is exhausted by Gosner 24, but lipid droplets are present.
Liver tissue remains firm during and dter metamorphosis. and the spaces of Disse contain-numerous microvil~and
large nucleoli. Parenchymal celis of Rana catesbeiana change
in fine structure in response to thyroid hormone (Cohen
et al. 1978 and Fox 1984, Bufo bufo and R. nigromaculata).
Peroxisome and micro~eroxisome~densities
i&rease in vitro
under thyroxine iniuence, and catalase activity is increased
by four times (Daua et al. 1980; Daua and Hourdry
1983). Hepatocyte cytology remains unchanged in X. luevis
during metamorphosis (Fox 1984).
Columnar celis lining the lumen of the gdbladder have
short microviiii, ribosomes, numerous smooth-wded veL
132
ANATOMY
/"*
CLT
Fig. 5.28. Anatomy and development of the larvai kidney. (A) Schemauc representation of the configuration of the larva1 kidneys. (B-D)
Pronephros of Rana esnrlenta (Gosner stage 27); l a and 1b in (B) connect with l a and l b in (C), and 2 in (C) connects with 2 in (D). Development of opisthonephros of R. esculenta. (E) Developing nephrons
134
ANATOMY
Fig. 5.29. Anatomy and development of the pro- and opisthonephros.
Pronephros in Rana escuenta: (A) Glomus and tubular c~mplex
( ~ o s n c 27);
r
arrow indicates a mesangial ceii; scaie = 50 p k (B) Visceral podocytic epithelium of the glomus; scale = 5 pm. Opisthonephros of Rana esmenta ( G D and F-G), and Bufo bufo (E): (C) Sshaped body; arrow indicates an invading mesangioblast; scaie = 30
Fm. (D) Peritoneal fumel; scaie = 50 pm. (E) Immature glomerulus
ofBufi, hfo;
scaie = 20 pm. From Naito (1984); repcinted by permission of Niigata University School of Medicine. (F) Glornerulus and
tubular cornplex; arrow indicates rnesangial celis; scale = 40 pm. (G)
Viscerai podocytic epithelium of glornerulus; scaie = 10 pm. See table
5.3 for abbreviations.
1983, Xenupus l e ; Fox 1963,1970, 1971, Rana temporaria; Fox and Hamilton 1971, X. hms; Gibley and Chang
1966, R. pipiens; Hurley 1958, R. sylaatica; JafTee 1954a,
R. pipiens; Kindahi 1938, R. tempmaria; Matsurka 1935,
Bufofomzosus; M. I. Michael and Yacob 1974, B. v. viridis,
H. a. sam>nyi, and R. 1: dibunda; Richter 1992,R. esculenta;
Schiuga 1974, B. bufo and Pelobates&scus). Each tubuiar
complex (figs. 5.28B-D, 5.29A) is composed of three
nephrostomal segments that lead from the coelom, via nephrostomes, to three short proximal tubuie segments. The cuboidal epithelium of the ciliated nephrostomal tubuie segment possesses straight intercelluiar junctions and irregularly
shaped mitochondria. The proximal segments unite to form
a common proximal tubuie segment. Micropinocytotic vesicles are visible between the microvilli of the apicai cell
membrane of the proximal tubuie cells. Proximal tubuiar reabsorption, large numbers of celluiar infoldings and lateral
interdigitations, and the presence of enzyme systems have
been demonstrated (Fox 1984, &nopus h s ; Grard and
Cordier 1934a, b, Alytes obstez%mns, B. bufo, Disc~lossuspictus, and R. temporaria; Hah 1974, Bombinu oriental& JafTee
1954b, 1963, R.pipiens; Piatka and Gibley 1967, R.pipiens).
Golgi networks are scarce in R. temporaria (Fox 1970) but
always present in X. laePis (Fox and Hamilton 1971). The
common proximal tubuie segment connects via an intermediate ciliated tubuie segment that more distdy becomes the
conneaing tubuie segment. The distal tubuie segment has a
flat, striated epithelium where water is reabsorbed (Grard
and Cordier 1934a). The connecting tubuie empties into the
pronephric duct.
The glomus is a slightly elongated mass of capiilaries and
intercapillary cells w i h n a spongy mesangial matrix and
covered by a visceral podocytic epithelium (fig. 5.29B). Podocytes have well-detined, interdigitating prirnary, secondary, and tertiary processes and pedicels. The afTerent vessel
of the capdary tufi is derived from the dorsal aorta, and the
efferent vessel is derived from the posterior cardinal vein
(figs. 5.28B and 5.29A). Epithelioid-like cells around the
afTerent vessels may regulate arterial pressure (Richter 1992;
Richter and Splechtna 1990, Rana esculenta). The space between the variou tubuie segments is occupied by sinusoids
of the posterior cardinal vein that form an extensive vascular network around the tubuies. The pronephric sinus plays
an irnportant role in hemopoiesis (K. L. Carpenter and Turpen 1979, Ranupipiens; Foxon 1964, G. Frank 1988, R. es-
135
ANATOMY
137
138
140
Fig. 5.31. Gonadai Merentiation of Rana nigrommulata. (A)Primordial gonad (Gosner stage 24), scaie = 50 pm. Sexualiy inMerent
gonads at (B) Gosner 26 and (C) Gosner 27; cortex and medda
clearly distinguished, direct contaa (awms) between corticai and medd a r y ceiis; scaie = 20 pm. Rudimentary testis: (D) Gosner 30, corticai and meddary regions closely associated (nrtenskr); mesenchyrnai
ceiis ( a m s ) and blood cap~laries(awmheadr) are evident; scale = 40
pm; (E) Gosner 35, inner epithelial mass separated from surface epithelium, shows cordlike structure; scale = 50 pm; and (F) Gosner 46,
rudmentary seminferous tubuies ( a m s ) formed from the inner epitheliai mass, and testicular rete connected to rudimentary seminiferous
tubuies (awmheadr); scaie = 100 pm. Rudimentary ovary: (G)
Gosner 30, cortex and medda separated, rnesenchyrnal A s ( a m s )
and blood capiaries (awmhead) visible; scde = 40 pm; (H) Gosner
40, formation of ovarian cavity evident in meddary celi mass, primitive follides (awms) visible in cortex; scale = 100 pm; and (I)Many
developing foiiicles present; scaie = 100 pm. See table 5.3 for abbreviations. From Tanimura and Iwasawa (1988); reprinted by permission
of the Japanese Society of Developmental Biologists.
vagii, female gonadal differentiation initially displays a testicular trend (Rengel and Pisan 1981).
Larval ovaries (figs. 5.30D-F and 5.31G-I) are larger
than testes and have a slightly irregular outline. They usudy
consist of meduiiary and cortical tissue in which the proliferating gonial ceiis form several groups of oogonia and oocytes
(Iwasawa and Yamaguchi 1984, X. W s ; Lamotte et al.
1973, Nimbaphlynodes occdentalis; Lopez 1989, Bombina
orientalk; Ogielska and Wagner 1990, R . ridibundu; Tanimura and Iwasawa 1986,B u .japonicusfomsus 1988,1991,
R. nigromaculuta 1989, Rhacophows arboreus). The cortex is
distinctiy separated from the meduiia by an aceiiular coliagenous layer, and the meduiiary tissue has degenerated and lost
its sex cord Dattern. The cords. which are continuous with
the mdiments of the rete ovarii svstem. dissolve. Small lumens formed in this way enlarge k d finhy fuse to the ovarian cavity. The meduiiary connective tissue thus becomes a
simple epithelial layer
the ovarian cavities.
Oogonia measure 17-25 pm in diameter and cytologic d y resemble PGCs except for the lack of pigrnent granules
and abundant ER. Oogonia undergo periodic proliferation
to replenish oogonial nests of about 16 gonial cek (Coggins
1973, Xenupw W s ; Lopez 1989, Bombina oriental&; Redshaw 1972, X. W s ) .Intercellular bridges appear to be responsible for synchronous developmeni d&Gg oogenesis
(Coggins 1973, X. W s ; Ruby et al. 1970, Ranup@iens).
The transition from primary to secondary oogonia (= primary oocytes) is characterized by a dark cytoplasm (Eddy
and Ito 1971. X. hmi) and a channe from lobed to round
nuclei. Oogonia and primary oocytes contain germ plasm
(Al-Mukthar and Webb 1971; J. B. Balinsky and Devis
1963; Coggins 1973; and Kalt 1973a,X. W s ; Delbos et al.
1971, R. dalmatina; Eddy and Ito 1971, R . catesbeiana, R.
clumitans, and R . pipiens; Kress and Spornitz 1972, R. esmlenta and R. temporaria).
Prophase of primary oocytes is initiated in larvae prior
to metamorphosis (Al-Mukthar and Webb 1971; Coggins
1973; Jmgensen 1973; Lofts 1974; Lopez 1989; Ogielska
and Wa~ner1990: Van Gansen 1986). At metamor~hicclimax larval ovaries exhibit oogonia and leptotene, zygotene,
V
142
ters (= germina1 cyst or nest) of celis of similar size and appearance that develop at a uniform rate (Fawcett et ai. 1959,
X. laevis; Rastogi et ai. 1983, R. esculenta).
Meiosis usu-allv starts in late metamorvhosis with the
transformation of secondary spermatogonia into primary
spermatocytes. Leptotene spermatocytes occasionally observed in larval gonads (Iwasawa and Kobayashi 1976,
R. nigromaculata; Kalt 1973a and Kalt and Gall1974,X. laevis) have large nuclei with siightly condensed chromatin.
Zygotene spermatocytes are characterized by a prominent
Golgi complex, a few flattened vesicles, and partiai synapsis
and condensation of sister chromatids (= bouquet configuration). Synapsis is completed in the pachytene stage. Germ
plasm disappears in pachytene spermatocytes (J. B. Kerr and
Dixon 1974,X. l m i ) , and chromatin bivaients become separated in diplotene spermatocytes.
The Woffian and Mderian duas of anurans transport
gametes and, especially in males, nitrogenous wastes andrater. Therefore, the anatomical structure of the genital ducts
reflects the functions of water economy, egg protection, and
nurturing of developing young (M. H. Wake 1979). The
Woffian duas arise from the anterior rezion of each kidnev
and converge irnmediately behind the l&heys as they prOceed to the cloaca. Woffian duas persist in both sexes to
develop initially as primary nephric ducts. In females they
retain their excretory function. In males they also serve as
urogenital ducts with remarkable modifications, especially
near the cloaca where a seminal vesicle develops in some species (Amer 1972, Bufo r&aYis; Beigl 1989, Bmbina vaYieBata, Bufo bufo, Disco~lossuspictus,and Rana esculenta; Bhaduri 1953; Bhaduri and Basu 1957).
In young female anurans, the Muilerian duas or oviducts
usudy arise at metamorphosis from tissue near the pronephric funnel (Richter 1992, R. esculenta, Gosner 43). They are
attached to the dorsal body w d , extend posterolaterally to
the Wolffian ducts, and connect to the cloaca. In larvae. M d lerian duas are s&aight, h n - w d e d tubules, and in dults,
they are extraordinarily coiled, especidy during the breeding season. Each oviduct includes an ostium, a short, straight
pars recta, and a long, coiled pars convoluta; the posterior
sections are eniarged as the ovisacs (Amer 1972, Bufo regularis; Bhaduri 1953; and Bhaduri and Basu 1957; P. Horton
1983. Rbeobatrachus silus). In males. Mullerian duas either
degenerate or remain vestigial and apparently functioniess.
Bidder's organ, present in male and most female bufonids
(Amer 1968-1969, B. regulans; Bhaduri 1953; Di Grande
1968, 1987; and Di Grande and Marescalchi 1987, Bufo
bufo; Tanimura and Iwasawa 1986, 1987, Bufojaponuusformosus; Zaccanti and Vigenti 1980, E. bufo), is formed from
the anterior mesogoniaiportion of the g e ~ t aridge.
l
Because
neither corticomeduilary structure nor primitive gonial cavities develop, Bidder's organ, which retains the potentiaiity
of an ovary in adults of both sexes, consists of a cortical layer
of flattened ceiis, peripherdy located gonial celis, a few 60cytes, and large auxocyte-hke ceils that partiaiiy degenerate
postmetarnorphicaiiy (figs. 5.30J-N). Gonial celis and oocytes increase in number at metamorphic climax. The num-
ANATOMY
143
ber and mitotic index of these celis is significantly hgher in quently pPGCs bear a single (15-30 Fm long) pseudopofemales (Tanirnura and Iwasawa 1987, B.j.fomsus). The fat diurn at one end and a short ( 3 4 Fm long) celular process
body, derived from the progonium, is characterized by pro- at the other extremity. Both are missing in PGCs situated at
liferating somatic cells that form fingerlike projections the genital ridge. The pPGCs show membrane adenylattached to the gonads. No data are available on the function cyclase activity (Delbos et al. 1981, R. esculenta andX. W )
of fat body in larvae, but in the adults, fat body mass and and are separated from the smali, polygonal somatic endogonad mass are inversely correlated (Chieffi et al. 1980, R. dermal celis by a large intercellular space (Ikenishi 1982, X.
esculenta; Jargensen 1986 and Jargensen et al. 1979, B. bufo; h s ) . The cells are rounded and contain many large yolk
Pancharzma and Saidapur 1985 and Saidapur 1983, 1986, platelets, abundant amorphous lipid droplets, cortical granEuph(yctis qanuphlyctis), and fat body excision may (Cheffi ules, and germ plasrn that is characterized by a mass of large,
et al. 1975, 1980, R. esculenta and Kasinathan et al. 1978, electron-dense mitochondria (Cwvwska 1972; Ikenishi et
Euph(yctishexadactyllw) or may not (Kanamadi and Saidapur ai. 1974; Ikenish and Kotani 1975; Kait 1973a; and L. D.
1988, E. qanuphlycts) result in testicular regression and sper- Smith and Wilhams 1979, X. iuevis; Mohawald and Hennen
matogenesis. In females, the fat body sustains vitellogenesis 1971 and M. A. Williams and Smith 1971, R. pipiens). The
round nucleus is, in contrast to the endodermal somatic nu(Prasadmurthy and Saidapur 1987, E. qanoph(yetis).
cleus, totipotent (L. D. Smith 1965, R. pipiens and Wylie
Reproductive System: Devebment
et ai. 1985, X. lmir) and contains a prominent nucleolus.
Gonadal development starts with the accumulation of germ Particles of P-glycogen supply the energy resource for migraplasm at the vegetal pole of the fertdized egg. During cleav- tion (Delbos et al. 1981, R. esculenta andX. k s ) . J. B. Kerr
age the germ plasm is distributed among a few cells that be- and Dixon (1974) suggested that germ plasm activated in
come progenitors of the germ cell line (Rournoure 1937 and germ celis between gastruiation and meiosis controls migraBournoure et 4 . 1954, Rana temporaria; Buehr and Blackler tion, mitosis, and meiosis.
1970 and K. E. Dixon 1981, Xenopus k;Di Bernardino
During migration, pPGCs show three main types of
1961; R. pipiens; Gipouloux 1962, 1975, DiscoglossuspiEtus, Merentiation: polarized pseudopodial projections conPhrynobatraEhus natalensis, R. pipiens, and R. temporaria; taining microfilaments, accumulation of extraceliular matrix
L. D. Smith 1965, 1966; R. pipiens; Wakahara 1978; Whit- around these projections, and junctions and desmosomes
ington and Dixon 1975,X. h s ; reviews by Beams and Kes- between the pPGCs and the substrate cells (Delbos et al.
se1 1974 and Eddy 1975).
1981, R. esculenta andX. h;
Delbos et al. 1982, B. bufo
Presumptive primordial germ cells (= pPGCs), giving and R. dalmatina; Heasman and Wylie 1978; Kamimura et
rise to a11 gametes, subsequently undergo a smaii number of al. 1980; Wylie and Heasman 1976a; and Wylie and Roos
cloning divisions during the migration to the genital ridge 1976,X. laevis). Migration of the pPGCs from the endoderm
(Whitington and Dixon 1975, X. k ) . After gastruiation, to the genital ridge likely is achieved by passive segregation
these celis (= pPGCs) migrate from the embryonic gut to of the pPGCs from other endodermal cells, by the fusion
the'root of the dorsal mesentery (Lopez 1989, Bombina ori- of lateral mesodermal plates to form the dorsal mesentery
entalis, Gosner 22) and then laterally across the dorsal ab- (Giorgi 1974 and Vannini and Giorgi 1969, B. bufo), and
dominal wall to the gonadal ridge (figs. 5 . 3 0 4 B; Iwasawa by the attraction exerted by the genital ridge on germ cells
Hyla arbmea, R
and Yamaguchi 1984; Kamirnura et al. 1976; and Zst and (Gipouloux 1970, B. bufo, Dis~~lossusputus,
Dixon 1977, X. laeais, Nieuwkoop/Faber 41-46; Lopez dalmatina, R. esculenta, and R. temporaria and Gipouloux
1989, Bombina mientalis, Gosner 23) where they Merenti- and Girard 1986). The basement membrane of the epithelial
ate into primordial germ cells (= PGCs). Between the early cells that line the migratory route of the pPGCs may be an
gastruia and Merentiation from the endoderm, pPGCs di- additional factor. T h s is believed to regulate the movement
vide twice (Dziadek and Dixon 1977 and Whitington and of pPGCs from endoderm to mesentery by restricting those
Dixon 1975, X. b i s ) . They synthesize DNA between ceils to the lateral plate (Heasman et al. 1985, X. laevis). The
Nieuwkoop/Faber 10-33 and RNA from the gastruia to pPGCs also may be guided by diffusible substances released
early tail-bud-stage (Dziadek and Dixon 1975, 1977, X. from the chordamesoderm (Giorgi 1974, B. bufo; Gipoub i s ) . The transcription of hnRNA, rnRNA, and DNA is loux 1964, 1970, B. bufo, D. pietus, H. arbmea, R. dalmatim,
suppressed during Nieuwkoop/Faber 4 0 4 8 (Wakahara R esculenta, and R. temporaria) and neural crest cells (Gipou1982). The cells remain mitoticaiiy quiescent between loux and Girard 1986, B. bufo). Diffusion of cAMP from the
Nieuwkoop/Faber 40-48 afier they enter the genital ridge; chordamesoderm is distributed along a concentration gradia second proliferative phase starts at about stage 48-52 (Ijiri ent that attracts pPGCs on their migratory pathway (Delbos
and Egami 1975; Zust and Dixon 1977; Wakahara 1982). et al. 1980,1981, R. esculenta andX. favis; Gipouloux et al.
The pPGCs, averaging 30 Fm in diameter, display polymor- 1978, X. laeais; Ratiba et al. 1981, R. dalmatina and X.
phsm during migration from their endodermal position to laevis). The cells move actively in a sequence involving elonthe genital crest (Kamimura et al. 1980, X. W s ) . The ultra- gation coupled with the extrusion of dopodia and broad
structure is similar in aii anuran species examined thus far blunt cell processes, waves of contraction, and ultimately by
(Delbos et al. 1982, Bufo bufo and R. dalmatina; Ikenishi retraction of the trailuig end of the cell (Heasman et al.
1980 and Wylie and Heasman 1976a, b, X. laeais). Fre- 1977; Heasman and Wylie 1978; and Wylie et al. 1979,
144
ANATOMY
145
1992, R. esculenta, Gosner 43). The lips of the groove close neurai crest origin (Accordi and Grassi Milano 1990),while
and the tube then grows posteriorly &til it jo& the cloaca. the gonadai primordia are of mesodermal origin.
The Mderian duas are present in both males and femaies,
although they typicaiiy degenerate in males (Bhaduri 1953; Pituitary Giund
Bhaduri and Basu 1957: M. H. Wake 19791. Embrvonic The stomodeal-hypophysed anlage is visible at NieuwkoopJ
differentiation of both genital duas is independent of hor- Faber 20 in Xenupus luevis. The adenohypophyseai anlage
monai influences, but as development proceeds they become segregates at NieuwkoopJFaber 28, and by stage 41 the
sensitive to steroids secreted by the gonadal primordium. largest mass of the compaa tissue lies anterior to the noEstroeenic
steroids are resoonsib~efor-the diierentiation of tochord. Differentiation of the pars intermedia begins at
"
the oviduct and urogenital papdla and for jelly secretion NieuwkoopJFaber47. Tuberai parts extend longitudindy in
(Gunasingh et ai. 1982, Euphyctis h e x ~ l u s ) .
NieuwkoopJFaber 5 1, and the entire hypophysis or pituitary
gland (neurohypophysis and adenohypophysis) is well deBidder's Ogan and Fat Body
veloped at stage 53 (Atwell 1918-1919; Eakin and Bush
Bidder's organ develops in maie and female bufonids from 1957; Nieuwkoop and Faber 1956).
The dislocation of the pars intermedia, pars nervosa, and
the mesogoniai seaion anterior to the definitive gonad.
Differentiation starts soon d e r hatching with the prolifera- mediai eminence from late Iorometamorohosis
to late metaI
tion of germ cells scattered among a few medda-llke cells morphic climax is similar in Bufo americanus, Ranap@iens,
(figs. 5.30J-N; Tanirnura and Iwasawa 1986, B. j. fomsus; and R. sylvatica. The horizontal axis from the mediai emisee Petrini and Zaccanti 1998 for effects of various hor- nence to the pars nervosa assumes a perpendicular or transmones and inhibitors).The germ cells eniarge and differen- verse orientation. and the ~ a r sintermedia and adenohvtiate into goniai and auxocyte-like ceh both enveloped by a pophysis are drawn dorsdy. By early metamorphic climax,
layer of foiiidar cells. During larvai development no sexual the adenohypophysis loses direa contact with the media1
Merentiation in the number of Eerm cells is found. Post- eminence and pars intermedia (Etkin 1968; Hanke 1976).
metamorphicdy the number of oocytes and secondary
Three types-of pituitary cells occur in larvae (Batten and
gonia are significantly higher in females (Tanimura and Iwa- Ingleton 1987; Hanke 1976; Van Oordt 1974; figs.
sawa 1987, B. j. fmzosus).
5.32A-B) : thyrotrops (NieuwkoopJFaber 48), a smaiier
The fat bo$ composed oniy of somatic cells is derived Type I basophii (stage 52), and adrenocorticotrops or
from the progoniai, germ cell-freepart of the germinai ridge. ACTH cells. The A1 acidouhiis secrete prolactin. and A2
In Xenopus, fat deposition starts at NieuwkoopJFaber 51 acidophils that secrete somatotropin are deteaable d e r
(Ogielska and Wagner 1990, R. ridibunda, Gosner 29). Fat metamorphic climax. During metamorphic climax (Nieuwbodies are largely composed of adipose cells at the beginning koop/~aber57) they are the-most numrous cell type in the
of hind limb development (Lopez 1989,B. orientalis, Gosner ventral half of the pars anterior.
30; Nieuwkoop and Faber 1967, X. luevis; Tanimura and
nyroid Giund
Iwasawa 1986, B. j.fomsus).
The thyroid begins to differentiate at SedraJMichael 27-28
(Gosner 17-18) as a ventral divertidum near the second
Endocrine System
visceral arch (Etkin 1936).At SedraJMichael35-36 (Gosner
Regulation of the development, growth, and metamorpho- 20) the groove aiong the anterior anlage has disappeared. At
sis of tadpoles by the endocrine glands of endodermai or me- SedraJMichael42(Gosner 24) the anlage separates from the
sodermai origin is a fascinating aspea of larvai biology. Ex- buccopharynx, contaas the basibranchial, and consists of
cept for the iodmated amino acid derivatives of the thyroid, two lobes bounded by a fibrous capsule and conneaed by
endodermal glands produce polypeptides, whiie mesoder- an anterior, saddle-shaped structure. At SedraJMichael 46
mal glands synthesize steroid hormones. Endocrine glands (Gosner 26-27) the lobes are separated, colloid-containing
of neurai or neural crest origin consist of photoreceptor cells fohcles are differentiated, and prefohcular cells are present.
(e.g., dorsai pineai complex, ventral infundibulum, neurohy- At SedraJMichael 50 (Gosner 29) each lobe divides and
pophysis anlage of pituitary gland) that evaginate from the comes into close contaa with the hypobranchialplate. Vacudiencephalon and produce oligopeptides, polypeptides, or, oles appear in the foiiicular cells, and a homogeneous basoin the case of the pineai complex, a derivative of amino acid philic colloid Ms the foiiicular lurnen. Beginning with SedraJMichae1 58 (Gosner 41) the lobes are about 1.5 times
and polypeptides (chap. 6).
The dorsomediai adenohypophysisanlage, the ventrome- that at SedraJMichael 57, the colurnnar cells are tali, and
diai thyroid anlage, and the endocrine glands derived from there are large chromatophobe droplets (Michael and A1 Adthe branchial arches d evaginate from the buccopharyngeal hami 1974).
area. The endocrine pancreas originates from the midgut anIn Xenupus luavi (NieuwkoopJFaber 33-34), the thyroid
lage. It is not clear whether the endocrine pancreas origi- anlage is situated medidy near the first viscerai pouch. At
nates from an ancestrdy difise gastrointestinai endocrine NieuwkoopJFaber 35-36 it grows posteroventrdy as a thin
system, d&se and already specialized endocrine cells of the strand of cells under the skin. The anlage thickens, spiits into
intestinal w d , or the neurai crest (Epple and Lewis 1973; two lobes (NieuwkoopJFaber 37-38), comes to iie near the
Wessels 1968). The adrenai glands are of mesodermal and branching point of the truncus arteriosus at stage 39, and is
V
146
EndomCrCne
Pancrem
The islets of h g e r h a n s develop from celis lining branching
ducts or capiiiaries that extend through the exocriie pancreas tissue. The precursors of a-celis (= glucagon or A celis)
are not visible before Gaien/Houiiion 27-28 in Dism~loossus
pia% (Beaumont 1970) but are visible at Shumway 24 in
Ranappiens (Kaung 1981). The irst a-granules are synthesized by the Golgi apparatus. At Gaiiien/Houllion 31 the
a-ceiis are differentiated (Pouyet and Beaumont 1975,Alyies
obst&m).
The p-celis (= insuiin or B ceiis) are differentiated during h b - b u d stage. At Taylor/Koliros I1 in R.ppiensJ
p-celis and insuiin are already present and increase until Taylor/Koiiros XVIII and XIX, respectively (Kaung 1983).
In Xenqiw W the endocrine tissue starts to develop at
Nieuwkoop/Faber 42 (Fox 1984), although islet ceiis are not
differentiated before stage 48. Fox (1984) suggested that pcelis at Nieuwkoop/Faber 42 in X. laepis may be undifferentiated A ceiis or centroacinar celis of the adult pancreas. The
endocrine pancreas of Xenqiw metamorphs (after Nieuwkoop/Faber 61) consists of acini surrounded by a- and Pcells. After metarnorphosis the endocrine celis occupy about
3% of the total pancreatic tissue, and there is a drastic increase in insulin production in prometamorphic and metamorphic ciimax larvae (from Taylor/Koilros XI; Buchan
1985; Frye 1964). After an initial decrease of p-cells during
metamorphic climax (Taylor/KollrosXM-XX), stasis in Taylor/Koiiros XXI-XXV is foiiowed by another decrease during later stages (Kaung 1983, Ranupijkm). During prometamorphosis and metamorphic climax, pancreatic weight
and insuliniike imrnunoreactivity decreases (Hulsebus and
Farrar 1985, R. catesbeianu).
ANATOMY
147
148
(Lawrence); Oxford University Press (Oxford); SpringerVerlag (Heidelberg); Alan R. Liss, Inc. (New York);
Vaillant-Carmanne S. A. (Lige); Gustav Fischer Verlag
(Jena); E. J. Briii (Leiden); Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft
Geest und Portig K. G. (Leipzig); and the Zoological Society of London (London).
S. Richter is gratefui to B. Viertel for his keen and continu o u ~support. She is aiso gratefui to A. Tanimura, H . Iwasawa, and I. Naito for their valuable and spontaneous help
in providing iiiustrations. She is indebted to M. Stachowitsch for assistance in English translations and to S. Neulinger for preparing the iiiustrations.
INTEGRATION
Nervous and Sensory Systems
Michael J. Lannoo
Introduction
The nervous system, consisting of the brain and its craniai
nerves and the spinai cord and its nerves (fig. 6.1), underlies
aii vertebrate behaviors. Vertebrates detect environmentai
cues iitered through their variou senses and send these signais centraily via peripherai nerves. This information is processed by either relatively simple spinai reflexes or more
complex brain circuitry, and commands are sent back
through peripheral nerves to drive muscles and glands in
some presumably adaptive manner. An adaptation is deined
here as a feature that contributes to the survivai of an individual or to the survivai of its offspring (Liem and Wake
1985).
For most anurans, the tadpole n e d circuitry is remodeled abruptiy at metamorphosis. Sensory systems, muscle
groups, and glands are reworked during the transition from
aquatic, essentiaiiy limbless, swimming larvae to, in most
cases terrestrial, quadrupedal, saltatory adults. During this
remarkable transition. the nervous svstem must shift its ability to process and int&rate the infoimation received and the
systems being afFected between two very different types of
ornanisms. This transition means that in addition to the
usual and important questions of neurai structure and function, the tadpole nervous system requires a further leve1 of
anaiysis; unlike that of most other vertebrates, the nervous
system of the aquatic tadpole must be considered within the
context of its rapid metamorphosis into the nervous system
of a terrestriai frog. In this light, three questions concerning
the neurobiology of tadpoles are addressed. (1) What portion of a tadpole's nervous system reflects what a tadpole
actually uses? (2) Which systems must be reworked at metamorphosis? (3) What tadpole neurai tissues are developed
for later use by the adult?Also, interspecific variations in the
behavior and ecology of tadpoles reflected in their neuronal
organization
and function must be considered.
The general neurobiology of anuran tadpoles is less weii
known than that of either anuran embryos or adults. For
example, Spemann discovered the mesodermic induction of
ectoderm to neuroectoderm in anuran embrvos
(Ham,
burger 1988). Adult anurans were used in the discoveries of
the workings of the neuromuscular junction (Birks et ai.
1960) and the d e s underlying neuronal speciicity within
the visual system (e.g., Constantine-Paton et ai. 1983; Reh
et ai. 1983; R. W. Sperry 1963). An excellent review of the
neurobiology of amphibians, including adult structures, is
provided by Wilczynski (1992). More recentiy, studies of
tadpoles have provided an understanding of the growth of
the cerebeiium (e.g., Hauser et ai. 1986a, b, and Uray
U
MICHAEL J. LANNOO
and summarize the organization of the tadpole nervous system with a brief consideration of the changes
- that it undergoes during metarnorphosis.
An Overview
The nervous system can be divided into (1) peripheral
(PNS) versus central (CNS) systems, with the CNS divided
further into the brain and spinal cord (figs. 6.2-6.3); (2)
somatic (external or voluntary) and visceral (intemal or involuntary) systems; (3) sensory, integration, and motor systems; and (4) neurons and their more numerou supportive
glial cells. Neural processing begins with information acquired through the sense organs. External sensory systems
detect the types and intensities of energy present in the environment and translate this information into neuronal signals. Sensory systems act as flters for the reception of types
of stimuli with adaptive value while presumably eliminating
those that are less important. Internal sensory systems monitor the visceral environment and insure that the animal's
physiological mechanisms are operating within their limits
of tolerante.
The brain. which receives sensorv information and transmits motor commands either through cranial (CN) or spinal
(SN) nerves (figs. 6.2-6.3), is divided into a forebrain (prosencephalon), midbrain (mesencephalon), and hindbrain
(rhombencephalon; fig. 6.4; also see D. Black 1917); The
forebrain is divided into an anterior telencephalon and a posterior diencephalon (fig. 6.4), which function in receiving
oifactory and terminal nerve information and integrating
sensory inputs and motor outputs. One region of the diencephalon, the hypothalamus, regulates hormone produaion
and involuntary autonomic responses. The midbrain consists of a dorsd, sensory tectum and a ventral, motor tegmentum (fig. 6.4). The midbrain integrates first-order (primary) visual inputs with higher order inputs from the lateral
line, auditory, and vestibular systems. The hindbrain includes the cerebellum and meduiia oblongata (fig. 6.4), and
the combination of the mid- and hndbrains forms the brain
Fig. 6.1. Dorsal view of the brain and spinal cord in a generalized tad- stem. The area receives primary inputs from aii of the sensory systems except the terminal nerve and oifaaion, includpole. Cranial and spinal nerves are shown as if they have been severed.
ing vision, acousticolateral, gustatory, and general sensations, and sends motor commands to the muscles and glands
1985), the formation of and variation in the spinal cord (K. of the head, cervical region, and viscera. The reticular frmaNishkawa and Wassersug 1988, 1989; Nordlander 1984, tion of the brain stem is involved with integrating sensory
1986), and sexual differences w i t h the nervous system inputs and with overaii arousal. The cerebelium mediates
motor learning and coordination.
(Gorlick and Kellev 1987).
The spinal cord is both a relay center and controller of
The information contained in this chapter largely results
fiom research on species of Rama and Xinopus with most reflexive behaviors and receives sensory information from
other information based on species of Bufo and Hyh. The specialized touch, temperature, pain, and postural receptor
detaiis of the organization of higher brain centers ar; known organs through its dorsal nerve roots. The spinal cord either
only for adults and are presented as a starting point for un- diiectly provides the motor output to the muscles of the
derstanding the brain of tadpoles. To avoid the pitfaiis of trunk, taii, and developing limbs (reflex behavior; see Shirigenerahing about "the tadpole:' I point out known phylo- aev and Shupliakov 1986 for the anatomy of these connecgenetic and ecological variations. I introduce the nervous tions) through its ventral roots or first relais these sensations
system and the organization of the tadpole brain and then to the brain and then transmits the brain cornrnands back to
examine the organization and function of the spinal cord and the muscles. W~thinthe brain stem and gray matter of the
brain, discuss the variou sensory systems used by tadpoles, spinal cord, sensory centers tend to be aoisal, autonomic
i
INTEGRATION
151
thetic trunks, each a series of gangiia that extend from anterior to posterior and paraiiel to the spinai cord (fig. 6.6; Taxi
1976). sympathetic ganglia receive pregangiionic fibers that
trave1 through cornmunicating rami from the spinai nerves
(fig. 6.7; W. M. Davis and Numemacher 1974 and Schlosser and Roth 1995). About one quarter of the fibers in a
spinal nerve are pregangiionic parasympathetics (fig. 6.8;
Vance et ai. 1975). Pregangiionic fibers enter the sympathetic trunk and may course either anteriorly or posteriorly
IV
VI1
nALL
VI11
nPLL
Fig. 6.2. Lateral (i@) and dorsai (nhht)views of a generaiized tadpole
brain showing the positions of the craniai, lateral line, and selected spinai nerves. Craniai nerves (CN) : I = oifactory (CN O is induded with
CN I), I1 = optic, I11 = oculornotor, IV = ti-ochlear, V = mgeminai,
VII = facial, W I = acousticowstibular, M = glossopharyngeai,
X = vagus, XI = accessory, and XII = hypoglossai. Lateral line (LL)
nerves: nALL = anterior division and nPLL = posterior division. Spinai nerves (SN): 2 and 3 are the anteriormost spinai nerves. From
Stuesse et ai. (1983) and Lowe (1987); reprinted by permission of
Wdey-Liss, a subsidiary of John Wdey & Sons, Inc., and of Stuesse
and Lowe.
IX
X, M
XII
Fig. 6.3. Dorsai view of a generaiized brain and spinai cord of a tadpole showing craniai and spinai nerves. Craniai nerves I11 and Vi and
the posteriormost 10-18 pairs of spinai nerves whch innervate the tail
segrnents have been omitted for clariq. Abbrniations as in fig. 6.2.
152
MICHAEL J. LANNOO
TEC
Fig. 6.4. Lateral (I$)and dorsal (right) views of the tadpole brain.
Abbreviations: Forebrain: TEL = telencephalon and DI = diencephalon; rnidbrain: TEC = tectum and TEG = tegmentum; and hindbrain: CB = cerebelium and MO = m e d d a oblongata.
through two or three gangha prior to synapsing on postsynaptic neurons. Postsynaptic neurons leave the sympathetic
trunk and follow the major arteries to visceral organs. Presynaptic neurons may also synapse distal to the sympathetic
truck in viscerai plexuses (figs. 6.6-6.7). For example, the
solar plexus in anurans is formed by branches emanating
from sympathetic ganglia 3,4, and 5 that supply the stomach and adjacent parts of the alimentary canal (see C. A.
Brown et al. 1992). The sympathetic ganglia and nerves of
aii vertebrates develop from neurai crest cells. Neurons of
the parasympathetic system leave the central nervous system
either via cranial nerves or through the sacral parasympathetic system. Parasympathetic fibers from the laryngeus
ventralis branch craniai nerve CN X provide parasympathetic
innervation of the smooth muscles of the lungs, heart, and
stomach.
O h et ai. (1989) observed parasympathetic neurons by
backiiiing CNs V, VII, IX, and X branches with cobalt lysine. Parasympathetic ceii bodies form an almost continuous
column through the brain stem dorsai to the corresponding
motor neurons of the same craniai nerves. Heathcote and
Chen (1991) detailed the development of the parasympathetic cardiac ganghon in Xenopus hetis. The sacral parasympathetic system functions in reproduction and for this reason
may not be well developed in tadpoles.
Spinal Cord
The spinal cord occupies the n e d canal within the vertebral column and is round or oval in cross section (figs. 6.7-
SSP
Fig. 6.5. Cross sections of the brain stem. (A) The brain stem has an
inside (ventricular) and outside (pial) surface, and the dorsal, vertical
alar plates are separated from the ventral, horizontal basal plates by the
suicus Limitans in the lateral ventricular w d . (B) Cranial nerve and
brain stem functional components are arranged into four longitudinal
columns. (C) The ceiiuiar organization of the brain stem. Asterisk indicates position of suicus limitans, and dotred lities separate longitudinal
columns. Abbreviations: AP = alar plate, BP = basal plate, P = pial,
SA = somatic atferents (sensory), SAI, = stratum aibumen (major area
of fiber tracts), SE = somatic efferents, SEP = stratum ependymale
ceiis, SGR = Stratum griseum (major ceii body layer), SSP = stratum
subependymaie ceiis, V = ventricuiar, VA = visceral atferents, and
V E = viscerai efferents (motor).
INTEGRATION
Fig. 6.6. The sympathetic trunk showing ganglia 2-10 and the coeliac
(gut) plexus of an adult &na esculenta. Ganglion 8 is split in the specimen drawn, and the ventral rami of spinal nerves 3-6 are indicated.
Abbreviations: CP = coeliac plexus, Gan = ganghon, and SN = spinal
nerve. Redrawn from Taxi (1976) with modifications of the original
figure suggested by Dr. Taxi; reprinted by permission of SpringerVerlag q d Taxi.
153
from the cord progressively more anterior than they exit the
neurai canal (fig. 6.9). Nerves exit the neurai canal between
the vertebrae, except for SN 10 and 11 (if present), which
exit via forarninae in the coccyx. The morphology of the spinai cord and spinal nerves and their relationships to tail myotomes through metamorphosis have been studied by K. Nishkawa and Wassersug (1988) for both Rana and Xenopus.
Spinal nerves range from 23 to 29 pairs prirnitively (e.g.,
ascaphds and discoglossids), and reductions have occurred
independentiy at least seven times during anuran evolution.
The posterior end of the spinai cord, termed the filum terminde, in R. catesbeiana and R. pipiens (Chesler and Nicholson
1985) contains a functional neuropile supported by a large
number of gliai ceiis (H. Sasaki and Mannen 1981).
Tadpoles have a ventral root in the position of SN 1 that
is apparentiy homologous to CN XII in other vertebrates
and is designated here as such. All other spinai nerves have
a dorsai root with a large ganglion (M. R Davis and Constantine-Paton 1983 and Willielm and Coggeshaii 1981)
and a ventral root that fuses with the dorsai root distai to
the ganglion (fig. 6.7). Peripherai to this junction, a smaii
branch of the spinai nerve passes dorsaiiy to innervate the
skin and muscles of the dorsai trunk. The large ventral
branch of each spinai nerve innervates ventral and lateral skm
muscles of the trunk and tad. The ultrastructurai development of ventral roots has been studied by Nordlander et ai.
(1981). A ramus cornrnunicans containing preganglionic
Dorsal
Gray
Dorsal
Root
MICHAEL J. LANNOO
Fig. 6.8. Fiber types in the anuran spinai cord. The left side of the
iustration shows dorsal sensory fibers and a dendritic tree from an axiai
motor neuron from the right side; on the right there are three motor
neurons that send axons ventrdy to the periphery. The ventromedial
celi represents an axiai motor neuron of the mediai celi group (M), and
the more laterai celis represent limb motor neurons from the lateral
celi group (L). The transition between white matter and gray matter is
shown by a dashed iine. From Szkely and Czh (1976) after Szkely
(1976); reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag and Szkely.
Rana
INTEGRATION
155
MICHAEL J. LANNOO
TBS
157
INTEGRATION
(v)
158
MICHAEL J. 1,ANNOO
from brain stem nuclei and tracts involved in reflex arcs. The
superior olive (fig. 6.12) is located within the basal plate and
receives neurons from the dorsal octaval nucleus (CN VIII;
F d e r and Ebbesson 1973) and the midbrain tegmentum
(Wilczynski and Northcutt 1977). The olive sends fibers to
&e midbrain toms semicircularis (~ikundiweand Nieuwenhuys 1983 and Opdam et al. 1976). The nucleus isthmi (fig.
6.12) may be involved in processing binocular inputs in
adults and in tadpoles with overlapping visual fields. Most
tadpoles do not have binocular vision and the function of
this nucleus in tadpoles with lateral eyes is not clear. The
nucleus isthmi is reciprocdy connected to the midbrain tectum (Grobstein and Comer 1983; Udin et ai. 1992; Wdczynski and Northcutt 1977).
Among fiber tracts the medial longitudiiai fasciculus
(figs. 6.11E, F, G) is a phylogenetically old feature of the
vertebrate brain stem. This tract contains reticulospinal, vestibulomesencephalic, and vestibulospinal axons and mediates the vestibulo-ocular reflex. ~ h lateral
e
lemniscus (fig.
6.11F) carries second-order auditory and lateral line nerves
from their primary nuclei to the midbrain toms semicircuiaris. (Wilczynski 1988; Will 1988). S e m (1972) detailed
the develo~mentof these and other brain stem structures in
Rana temporaria.
Mauthner neurons (fig. 6.11G) are the largest axons in
the brain stem and appear to initiate the startle response of
tadpoles, although other ceiis may also contribute (R K. K.
Lee and Eaton 1989). Mauthner neuron connections have
been described in Bombina, Bufo tewestris, Hyla cinerea, I&.loulapulchra, Potypedates bucomystax, Rana escubnta, Scaphwpus holbrookii, and Xenopus laevis (Wdi 1986). Mauthner ceil
dendrites are contacted by fibers from the CNs VI11 and V,
lateral line neurons, and midbrain neutrons (Cioni et ai.
1989; Wdi 1986). The spinal motor neurons that receive
input from the Mauthner ceils in larval amphibians are the
earliest to develop (Blight 1978; Nordlander et al. 1985).
Stefaneiii (1951) reported that Mauthner ceil degeneration
is related to taii resorption at metamorphosis even in species
with aquatic adults, while Moulton et al. (1968) and Will
(1986) reveaied the persistence of Mauthner cells in adult
anurans.
The sensory and motor connections of CN XII (fig.
6.11H; Stuesse et ai. 1983) of Ranapipiens originate from
two nuclei located mediaiiy and laterdy withm the cauda
medda. Motor fibers from the medial nucleus project to
the extrinsic tongue muscles in adults. Motor fibers from the
lateral hypoglossal nucleus innervate the sternohyoid muscle. Sensory fibers arise mainly from the tongue, and in the
brain stem, they trave1 posteriorly in the dorsolateral fiber
tract to thoracic levels. The development of these motor and
sensory connections in tadpoles probably depends on the extent of tongue development.
The central projections of the CN IX-X complex (fig.
6.12) were mapped by Stuesse et ai. (1984; adult Rana catesbeiana) and Simpson et ai. (1986; adult Xenupus laepis).Motor fibers of CN IX arise in the brain stem from a s m d ventrolateral nucleus, and those of CN X originate from a
slightly more posterior nucleus (Stuesse et al. 1984). AfFer-
ents from CNs IX and X enter the dorsal roots of the respective nerves and descend in two tracts, either the solitary tract
(fig. 6.12) or the spinal tract of CN V and the dorsolateral
tract of the spinal cord. In Xenupus, CNs IX and X fibers are
within the three roots of the H-X complex and withm the
nPLL (Simpson et al. 1986). The most anterior of these
IX-X roots (root 1) contains sensory fibers that terminate in
the solitary tract and on lateral line efferents. Root 2 contains
somatosensory fibers that terminate in the posterior meduiia
and anterior spinal cord and motor fibers from CNs IX and
X. Root 3 contains motor fibers to the laryngeal musdes and
efferents to the viscera. The results of these studies confirmed the same general conclusions of Rubinson and Friedman (1977) on Rana catesbeiana, R. pipiens, and Xenupus
muelbri.
Lateral line, acoustic, and vestibular afferents terminate
in different areas of the somatic sensory column (figs. 6.116.12; Fritzsch 1988; McCorrnick 1988; Wiil1988; Wdi and
Fritzsch 1988). Herrick (1948) and Larsell (1934) proposed
that lateral line target neurons receive auditory fibers at
metamorphosis. Fritzsch et ai. (1984) and Jacoby and Rubinson (1983) did not support this hypothesis based on
modern tract-tracing techniques. Lateral line fibers project
into an intermediate nucleus, whle auditory fibers project
to a distinct nucleus located more laterdy and ventrdy
(Fritzsch et al. 1984). According to Aitman and Dawes
(1983), some anterior fibers in the posterior division of the
CN LL (nPLL) may be cutaneous afferents that project to
the spinal cord in a manner similar to that of CN V. Within
the lateral line system, second-order neurons project to the
contralateral midbrain torus semicircularis (figs. 6.11-6.12)
via the lateral lernniscus (fig. 6.11F).
Efferent neurons (not shown) project from the brain
stem back to receptors and prevent hair ceiis from firing.
These fibers originate fiom a CN VI11 nucleus located vent r d y and medially withm the medulla (Fritzsch 1981a; Russell 1976). Primary afferents from the amphibian and basilar
papillae (fig. 6.13, see auditory system) project into one or
two nuclei at the dorsolateral edge of the aiar plate (figs.
6.11-6.12; Aitman and Dawes 1983; Fritzsch et ai. 1988a,
b; Jacoby and Rubinson 1983). Rubinson and Skiies (1975)
suggested that primary auditory afferents also project directly to the superior olivary nucleus. Second-order projections from the primary auditory nucleus project to the superior olivary nucleus (Rubinson and Skiies 1975) and the
midbrain torus semicircularis (fig. 6.12; Nikundiwe and
Nieuwenhuys 1983; Opdam et al. 1976, Rana; Wilczynski
1988).
Sensory fibers from neurons innervating the semicircular
canals, utricle, saccule, and lagena project into the meddary
vestibular complex(fig. 6.13). Sensory vestibular fibers aiso
project directly to the cerebeiium (Altman and Dawes 1983).
Efferents from the brain stem to the vestibular end organs
arise from the same nucleus as lateral line efferents, and
single efferent neurons may send axons to both the lateral
line and vestibular systems (Claas et al. 1981). Based on second-order projections, the vestibular complex can be divided
into anterior and posterior divisions (not shown). In Rana
INTEGRATION
159
160
MICHAEL J. LANNOO
connections from the contralateral t o m (Nikundiwe and ery et ai. (1982) examined the rnesencephaiic nuclei responNicuwenhuys 1983; review by Northcutt 1980). The nu- sible for the optokinetic response in R.pipiens aduits.
deus mber forms reciprocal connections with the cerebellum
(Larson-Prior and Cruce 1992).
Three additional tegmental nuclei have been identiied. The telencephalon and diencephaion (fig. 6.4) integrate senThe nucleus profundus (fig. 6.12) receives fibers from the sory inputs and initiate motor outputs. The telencephaion
superior olive (Rubinson and Skdes 1975), but its funaion appears to integrate sensory information beyond that found
is unknown. The optic nucleus receives bilateral connections in the thaiamic nuclei (Ebbesson 1980: Northcutt 1981).
projecting from each retina (Levine 1980). The mesence- The telencephalon receives anterior inputs from the oifacphalic nucleus of CN V contains large sensory neurons that tory buibs (CN I) and terminal nerve (CN 0) and posterior
systems
mediate masticatory forces. More cells occur in the trigemi- inputs from the visual, auditory, and
nai rnesencephalic nucleus of tadpoles than in adults and by way of thalamic (diencephaiic) relays (Kicliter 1979;
during metamorphosis a large number of these celis die Northcutt 1974: Wilczvnski and Northcutt 1983a). The di(Kollros 1984, Ranap$iens; Koiiros and Thesse 1985, Xn- encephalon includes the epithaiamus, consisting of the haopus l m i ) . The midbrain tectum is located dorsal t o the teg- benula and the pineal gland; the hypothalamus, which conmentum (figs. 6.4 and 6.11E) and receives first-order inputs trols homeostasis and drives such as hunger and thirst (fig.
from retinai gangiion ceiis and third-order inputs from the 6.11); and the thaiamus, which functions primarily as a relay
laterai line and aiiditory systems (Ebbesson 1970; Keating nucleus. Stehouwer (1987) described the effects of forebrain
and Gaze 1970; Lowe 1986). The tectum integrates sensory ablations on the behavior bf tadpoles.
inputs with motor commands (Elepfandt 1988a, b, lateral
Thc terminal nerve (CN O), of iinknown function in anline system,X. laeyt?).Tectai inputs were considered by Wilc- urans, is associated with the olfaaory nerve (Herrick 1909;
zynski and Northcutt (1977), and Lowe (1987) showed that Hofmann and Meyer 1989; aiso Szabo et al. 1990). Hofsingle cells within the tectum respond to both lateral line and mann and Meyer (1989) reported that the terminal nerve in
visual inputs. Vestibular and auditory signais also reacli the Bufi, &nus a n d x m p s h s projects to the forebrain memidbrain tectunl. Auditory and laterai iine information ter- diai septum, preoptic nucleus, and the hypothalamus. The
minates in the toms sernicircularis before being relayed to olfactory bulbs (CN I) located distal to the anterior telenthe tectum (Feng and Lin 1991; Pettigrew 1981; Wilczynski ce~halohare corhected to the brain via olfactorv tracts. The
1981). The toms is homologous with the mammaiian infe- t&gets of these traas are the main olfactory b d b and the
rior colliculus, and the tecturn is a homolog of the superior accessory oifaaory bulb (fig. 6.14; Scalia et ai. 1991a, b).
colliculils.
The ma& olfacto& bdb. a~cessorvolfactorv buib, and the
The tectum is the best-studied structure in the anuran anterior olfaaory nucieus are interconnected ipsilaterdy.
brain. Retinal ganglion celi axons of tadpoles projcct to the The main oifactorv bulb and anterior oifactorv nucleus moicontralateral tecnun in an ordered fashion, an arrangement ect to the contralaieral mediai waii of the telen&phalon.ipithat faciiitates the study of neuronal connections (e.g., Con- lateral main olfaaory b d b fibers aiso terminate near the oristantine-Paton and Capranica 1976; Debski and Con- "
zin of the brain stem mediai loneitudinai fasciculus. The
stantine-Paton 1990; Reh et 4 . 1983). The formation of accessory olfactory bulb projects to the lateral cortex of the
order within the nervous system is itself an important ques- contraiaterai telencephalon via the lateral forebrain bundie.
tion. Recent papers on this subject involving anurans include The amygdaia, a nucleus associated with the olfactory systein
Constantine-Paton (1987), Constantine-Paton et ai. (1983), (fig. 6.14), projects to two nuclei within the ipsilaterai hypoFujisawa (1987), Grobstein et al. (1980); Levine (1980), thalamus and a nucleus posterior to the ipsilateral nucleus
Montgomery and Fite (1989), Reh et al. (1983), and Straz- isthmi (fig. 6.12; Kemali and Guglielrnotti 1977). Scalia
nicky and Tay (1982). Detads of the salamander tectum in et ai. (1991a, b) provided detaiied descriptions of the inain
the context of visual behavior were presented by G. Roth and accessory olfaaory bulb projections in Ranapipiens. Ji(1987), and Lzr et ai. (1991) deinonstrated differences in ang and Holley (1992) described the olfactory bulb outputs
the pattern of tectal lamination benveen Rana escunta and in R. ridibunda, and Burd (1992) and Byrd and Burd (1991)
Xemps &S.
Anterior tectal projections in the tectotha- described olfactorv develo~rnentin Xx&us ue9is.
lamic tract and the postoptic commissure (Lzr et ai. 1983;
The posterior telencephaion is divided into four areas
Vessekn et al. 1971) wili be considcred with the forebrain. around each lateral ventricle (figs. 6.11 and 6.14). The dorPosterior tectai efferents project to the nucleus isthmi (fig. sal part of the posterior te~ence~halon
is divided into medial
6.12) and in turn comect bilateraiiy back to the tectum and lateral pallial areas. The septal area fies ventral to the
(Grobstein and Comer 1983; Gruberg and Udin 1978; medial I~aliium.and the striatal area iies ventral to the lateral
Udin and Fisher 1985). Other posterior tectal projections pallium and lateral to the septum. The amygdala lies in the
include tectobulbar (bulb refers to the meddia) and tectos- posterior striatum. The septum and striatum are synaptic
pinai fibers which rnay be responsible for generating or stations where olfactom fibers ioin with fibers from the ditransmitting motor commands (Lzr et ai. 1983). The pre- emephaiic thaiamus &d the hidbrain. The telencephaion
tectal nucleus lentifornus (not shown) receives contraiaterai connects with posterior brain areas through the mediai and
retinal inputs as well as inputs from the tecnun and tegmen- laterai forebrain bundies (fiz. 6.14). The mediai forebrain
tum in Ranapipiens (Montgomery et ai. 1985). Montgom- bundle contains ascending and descending conneaions that
INTEGRATION
161
il
MICHAEL J . LANNOO
the lateral line system, olfaction, taste, vision, and rnisceiianeous senses (,.i., photodetection through the pineai complex and somatosensation-pain and posturai sensation,
temperature, and touch). For each system, the material wiN
be presented in the sequence: receptor structure and function, peripheral innervation, first-order connections within
the brain or spinal cord, development, and patterns of phylogenetic and ecological variation.
Fig. 6.15. The projection of pineal axons into the ventral diencephalon in embryonic anurans. Low-power diagram (upper) for orientation
of brain regions within the embryo, and higher magnification ( h m )
to show features of the projections. Abbreviations: F = forebrain,
H = h d b r a i n , M = midbrain, O P = optic placode, OT = otic
placode, P = pineal gland, P R OPT = preoptic commissure, V = CN
V, and VC = ventral commissure. Redrawn from R. G. Foster and
Roberts (1982);reprinted by permission of Springer-Verlag and
Foster.
Sensory Systems
The sensory capabilities of generalized tadpoles include: audition and vestibular functions, mechanoreception through
Auditoly System
The anatomy, development, evolution, and physiology of
the anuran auditory system have been weii studied (e.g.,
Fritzsch et al. 1988a; Viiiy 1890; Wever 1985). The role of
audition in spacing, courtship, and isolating mechanisms
contributing to speciation is weii known for aduits (Fritzsch
et ai. 1988a; McCormick 1988; Ryan 1986, 1988; J. J.
Schwartz and Weiis 1983). It is important to realize that the
mode of transfer of pressure waves (sounds) to the inner ear
(Jaslow et al. 1988) is different in tadpoles than in aduits. In
aduits, sound impinges on the tympanic membrane where
pressure differentials are transformed into mechanical movements. The middle ear transmits these vibrations to the inner
ear via (fig. 6.13) the plearum (attaches to the tympanum),
columeiia (the connecting bone), and opercuium (links columeiia to the oval window, which in turn connects to the inner ear). In some anurans the columeiia has been lost (Trueb
1973, 1979). Motions of the oval window create movements of the perilymphatic fluid that generate movements of
the endolymphatic fluid. The endolymphatic fluid stimulates
the hair
of the sensorv neuroe~i;heliaand the basilar
and amphibian papillae.
Tadpoles hear despite lacking middle ear bones and a
tvmDanum. Sound oressures are transmitted to the inner
ear via a bronchiai columella. which "
grows from the round
window (a connection betwien the middle and inner ears)
toward the ipsilaterai bronchus and lung at about the time
of opercular closure (Witschi 1949, 1956). In the process
of growing, the columeiia pierces the dorsal aorta (see
Boatwright-Horowitz and Sirnmons 1997). According to
Capranica (1976) and Witschi (1949), this unusual arrangement mav isolate the columella from other tissues and permit it a greater degree of movement. The columeiia attaches
to the lung and bronchus, which vibrate in response to
changes in water pressure.
The inner ear of tadpoles and aduits contains two auditory receptive areas, the amphibian papiiia and basilar papiiia
(fig. 6.13; E. R. Lewis and Lombard 1988). Amphibians are
unique in this regard because most other vertebrates have
one auditory receptive area epithelium (e.g., saccuie in fish,
bailar papia in reptiles, and cochlea in birds and mammals;
Wever 1973). The surface morphology of the amphibian papdia of Rana catesbeiana is described by E. R. Lewis (1976)
and E. R. Lewis and Lombard (1988). The basilar and amphibian papiiiae are tuned to different frequencies which
tend to be s~ecializedto an animal's acoustic environment.
The number of hair ceii receptors within these papiiiae varies
interspecificallyand with size intraspecifically. Typically, large
animais have large papiliae that contain numerous hair celis
i
INTEGRATION
i Capranica 1976). The basilar papilla is the generalized auditory organ. Its hair ceiis receive only afferent innervation and
respond to frequencies above 500 Hz. The amphbian papilla is sensitive to both low- and high-frequency stimuli.
During metamorphosis of Bufi reguhrts, the walls of the
dorsal aorta close; the bronchal columeiia is resorbed; and
the oval window, operculum, and tympanic columella form.
-1t metamorphosis the cartilage for the plectrum is visible
and the tympanic membrane is visible as a crescent-shaped
smicture (Capranica 1976).
Auditory fibers from the basilar and amphibian papiiiae
trave1 in CN VI11 (acousticovestidar nerve) and terminate
in the auditory nucleus in the brain stem (Boord et al. 1970;
Capranica and Moffat 1974; Larsell 1934; Matesz 1979;
McCormick 1982). Acoustic fibers within CN VI11 are organized by the frequency of the stimulus they carry. The auditory system in anurans has been considered in detail by
Fritzsch et al. (1988a).
Shofner and Feng (1984) exarnined the developing basilar and amphbian papillae with both light and scanning
electron microscopy and described an increase in the size of
the sensory epithelium and the addition of hair cells as the
animal grows. Capranica (1976), Fritzsch et al. (1988a, b),
Sedra and Michael (1959), and Witsch (1949, 1956) detailed the changes in the auditory apparatus through larval
development and metamorphosis in Bu$ and Rana. Mudry
and Capranica (1980, 1987), Mudry et al. (1977), Neary
(1988), and Neary and Wilczynski (1986) described auditory pathways in the forebrain of adult Rana. See Fritzsch
(1988) for a description of the evolution of the auditory system in anurans.
VestibularSystem
The vestibular system consists of three orthogonally oriented semicircular canals plus a utricle. a saccde. and a lagena that function together in orientation and maintenance
of body position in space (fig. 6.13; E. R. Lewis and Lombard 1988). As with the lateral line and auditorv, svstems.
,
the sensory mechanism is fluid (endolymphatic fluid in the
vestibular system) motion across an epithelium of mechanorece~tivehair ceiis. The sensorv e~itheliaof the three senlicircular canals are contained in ampullary bulges w i t h the
canais, while utricular and s a c d a r hair cells project into an
otolithic membrane. The semicircular canals detect a n d a r
acceleration or rate of body turning and tilting and are oriented in orthogonal planes with respect to each other (e.g.,
E. R. Lewis and Lombard 1988; Precht 1976). Each of the
semicircular canals emerges from the elongate utricle. The
anterior vertical semicircular canal detects motion in an anterolateral-posteromedial plane, the posterior vertical canal
detects motions in an anteromedial-posterolateralplane, and
the horizontal canal detects horizontal movements. The anterior vertical canal of one side of the tadpole is oriented in
the same plane as the contralateral posterior vertical canal.
The utricle and saccule monitor linear acceleration and gravitational puli. The utricular macula is oriented horizontally
and is crescent-shaped around a central structure termed the
striola. The hair cells are polarized in a direction radial to the
i
'3
163
striolar curve and, taken together, are responsive to movements through 360". Type I hair cells with long stereocilia
that extend to the tip of the kinociiium are found along the
striola. Type I1 hair cells with a long kinociiium and short
stereociiia are found along the sides of the striola.
The saccular mac~ilais oriented nearly vertically and faces
posterolaterally. The striola is curved and the hair cells, conSidered toge&er, are sensitive through 360". Outside the
striola, kinocilia are directed outward and inside they face
inward. Most saccular hair cells resemble the utricular Type
I1 cells. The posterior protrusion from the saccule is termed
the lagena and has a ciliary pattern resembling the utricle.
Afferent neurons are bipolar cells. Axons terminate in the
vestibular nucleus (e.g., R. F. Dunn 1978). Hair cells also
receive efferent fibers. Caston and Bricout-Berthout (1985)
described conneaions of vestibular nerve to the horizontal
semicircular canal in Rana esculenta and showed that the
efferents both inhibit and facilitate the afferent response.
These authors reported that neurons within the vestbular
nucleus respond both to motion through the vestibular
nerve and light pulses from the midbrain tectum. Van Bergeijk (1959) described a reflexive vestibular behavior that
allows Xenopus tadpoles to maintain a stable position in the
water colurnn.
M I C H A E L J. L A N N O O
164
PSO
hyperpolarize the other. Neuromasts are innervated by muitiple neurons, and hair ceiis that are oriented simdarly are
innervated bv fibers of the same neuron.
Neuromasts are usuaiiy elongated, and their direction of
maximum sensitivity corresponds to the long axis of the
oval. Sensitivitv in directions other than the main axis is Droportional to the cosine of the angle from the main axis
(Flock 1965). Unlike other tadpoles, pipoid larvae have
round neuromasts; such structure makes their axis of sensitivity difficult to determine (Lannoo 1987). In contrast,
aquatic pipoid adults have linear neuromasts (Shelton 1970,
1971). Typicaiiy, neuromasts w i t h a line are oriented in
the same direction (fig. 6.16A; Gorner 1963; Lannoo 1987;
Shelton 1970). Dorsal trunk neuromasts are most sensitive
to dis~lacementsin a dorsoventral direction. and middle and
ventrai neuromasts are most sensitive to anterior-posterior
displacements. On the head, supraorbital and infraorbital
lines around the eve are most sensitive in directions tanaen"
tial to the margin of the eye. As these lines run onto the
snout, neuromasts change orientation to become anteriorposteriorly sensitive. The angular l h e is most sensitive to
dorsoventral displacements while the two hyoid lines combine to be sensitive to both dorsoventrai and anteriorposterior displacements (Lannoo 1987).
As generaiized, pond-dwelling tadpoles grow, prirnary
neuromasts formed embryonicaiiy divide to form secondary
neuromasts (fig. 6.16B; Lannoo 1987; Russeii 1976). A
secondary neuromasts derived from a single primary neuromast are aiigned in the same direction as the primary neuro-
mast and compose a receptor unit (after Zakon 1984; previously termed stitch or plaque, Lannoo 1987, 1988; I. J.
Russeii 1976).
Hair celis within neuromasts are innervated by bipolar
prirnary a'ierent neurons whose ceii bodies are 1catd in
ganglia (Shelton 1970; Van Der Horst 1934). Neuromast
afferents course through branches of either the anterior
(nALL, head) or posterior (nPLL, trunk) lateral line nerve.
Once in the brain, aii lateral line a'ierents bifurcate to send
one coiiateral anteriorly and one posteriorly within the meduliary nucleus mediaiis (Altman and Dawes 1983; Boord
and Eisworth 1972; Fritzsch et al. 1984; Jacoby and Rubinson 1983; Lowe and Russeli 1982; Matesz and Szkely
1978). Neuromasts ais0 are innervated by efferent fibers
whose ceii bodies are located in the ventral medulia (WiU
1982). Efferent axons course through the lateral line nerves.
Single efferent ceiis may send axon; to the lateral line, auditory, and vestibular systems (Claas et al. 1981). The efferent
system appears to hyperpolarize hair ceiis, which prevents
neuromast function and precludes overstimuiation (e.g.,
during swimrning; I. J. Russeii 1976). The laterai line system
may be responsible for maintaining the spacing between individuais in schools of Bufo tadpoles. Diminishing the sensitivity of neuromasts through exposure to streptomycin,
which is toxic to hair celis, alters the orientation of individuals and the distance between tadpoles of Xenupus laevis (Lum
et ai. 1982). In adult Xenopus, Elepfandt (1988a, b) .found
that the oriented response to water displacements diminishes with the suraical
ablation of neuromasts.
"
Neuromast receptor units vary in number of organs,
number of hair celis per organ, and their position relative to
the epidermai surface. These morphologicai features correlate weli with the particular habitat of a tadpole (Lannoo
1987) and presumably are adaptive. Generalized pond tadpoles have a large number of units composed of three to five
secondary neuromast organs that are positioned flush with
the epidermis. In contrast, stream and arboreal tadpoles have
fewer receptor units composed solely of primary neuromasts
that are positioned below the epidermai surface. In general,
reductions in the number of receptor units occur within lines
rather than through the elunination of whole lines, aithough
Acaphus tadpoles appear to have lost their oral line (Lannoo 1987). Considerable variation in neuromast features is
found within the genus Osteopilus (Hylidae). Older tadpoles
of the bromeliad-dweiiing 0 . bmnneus (see Thompson 1996
for mformation on the habitat and ecology of these tadpoles)
have receptor units composed of single (primary) neuromasts, while congeneric, pond-dweliing tadpoles (0. hminuensis and 0 . septentrionalis) have receptor units containing
multi~lesecondarv neuromasts (Lannoo et al. 1987).
The lateral line system develops embryonicaiiy from preand postoptic placodes (R. G. Harrison 1904; Lannoo and
Smith 1989; S. C. Smith et al. 1988, 1990; Stone 1922,
1933; see J. F. Webb and Noden 1993). These placodes give
rise to primordia that migrate in anterior and posterior directions to form the neuromast organs and their innervation
(review bv Lannoo and Smith 1989'). Primordia from vreotic placodes migrate anteriorly to form the cranial laterai
INTEGRATION
165
Fig. 6.17. Developmental series (I@ to niht) and organization of the olfactos. epithelium. Note the ciliated
ces separating th dark oifactory neurois. From ~ l e m
and Graziadei (1983); reprinted by permission of
Wiley-Liss, a subsidiaty of John Wdey & Sons, Inc., and of Kiein.
166
MICHAEL J. L A N N O O
rods
OPL
I PL
on cent
kaUy
168
MICHAEL J. L A N N O O
The iiterature on the visual orientation and feedmg behavior of anurans has been dominated by studies on adult
frogs (Ingle 1976; Maturana et ai. 1960). From a phylogenetic perspective (review by Grsser and Grsser-Cornehls
1976), the retinas of adult ranids respond to cues from stationary objects, those of bufonids respond to cues from
moving objects, and hylids respond to intermediate stimuli.
These visudy guided behaviors correspond to ecological activity patterns (sit-and-wait vs. mobile predators) and result
from differing proportions of retinal neuronal classes. Interestingly, the tadples of the species reviewed by Grsser et
al. (1976; Bufo bufo, Osteupilusscptentrionalis, Rana esculenta,
and R. pipicns) were d generalized pond dwellers (Orton
1944). This begs the question of whether the retinal morphology of these tadpoles reflects their common lifestyle or
the more variable iifestyles of their respective adults.
Retinal ceii number increases with growth in tadpoles.
Beach and Tacobson (1979a., b), and P. Grant et al. (1980)
examined the patterns of ceii proliferation in the retina of
Xenupus. S. Grant and Keating (1986) studied the metamorphic and postmetamorphic maturation of the retina and the
midbrain optic t e m m . Dunlop and Beazley (1981) described the increasing number of ganglion cells in tadpoles
through adults in Helewpoms eyrez, where a visual streak is
Dresent in adults but not tadooles: Bork et al. (1987) deScribed the growth of optic fibers in the retina f X2Loptcs,
and C d e n and Webster (1979) described the metamorphic
changes that occur in the myelin sheath of optic nerve axons
L
Miscellaneous Senses
Adult frogs, and apparentiy tadpoles, are sensitive to pain
and touch through free nerve endings in the epidermis and
dermis (reviews by Catton 1976 and Spray 1976). Cutaneous nerves, among the 60-80 myelinated neurons arising
from each spinal nirve, can be g-6uped into two functiond
categories: those less than 3 pm, which are also the slowest
conducting fibers (0.8-5 m/s) that transmit temperature and
pain impulses, and those greater than 5 pm with conduction
belocities greater than 7 m/s that transmit phasic and tonic
pressure information. In addition to s m d fibers with slow
conduction velocities, pain and temperature receptors are
characterized by a long latency from-stimulus to &scharge
and by an action potential of long duration.
The pineal organ (epiphysis) is a s m d projection attached to the dorsomedial surface of the epithalamus (fig.
6.15) which, within amphibians, is best developed in anurans. These fibers enter the pretectal region in the posterior
portion of the epithalamus. The cytology of the pineal is described by Van de Kamer (1965). This organ functions in
detecting features of ambient light, such as seasonal variation
in photoperiod and perhaps the strength and inclination of
sunlight, that mediate physiological functions such as breeding and ovenvintering (Bagnara 1965; Binkley et al. 1988).
Locomotor activity is altered by a sudden drop in light intensity detected by the pineal organ (R. G. Foster and Roberts 1982). Hendrickson and Keiiy (1971) described the
development of this structure. Frogs (D. H . Taylor and Fer-
guson 1970) and tadpoles (Justis and Taylor 1976) can orient relative to a shoreline when dowed only pineal input.
In most anuran tadpoles and adults, the peripheral portion of the pineal organ is termed the frontal organ (= stirnorgan; reviewed by Adler 1976). The skin with reduced pigmentation overlying the frontal organ is c d e d the brow
spot. Eldred et al. (1980) showed that the central projections of the frontal organ are similar to the ordinary pineal
projections and are widespread, including the amygdala,
pretectal region, and the central gray of the mesencephalon
and dience~halon.
Muscle Spindles are stretch receptors that provide information about the location and position of the limbs, trunk,
and tail. S~indlesare reflexivelvconnectedto motor neurons
through a pathway termed the stretch reflex, which serves
to maintain muscles at their functiondy appropriate length
(e.g., E. G. Gray 1957; reviewed in Ottoson 1976); Gans
and De Gueldre (1992) presented some data on the physiology of larval muscles.
Metamorphosis
The changes that occur in the nervous system of anurans
during metamorphosis and the effects of thyroxine in driving these changes are summarized in Hughes (1976) and
Koiiros (1981). Some conclusions can be drawn about how
the nervous system accommodates the tadpole and adult
stages. First, the tadpole nervous system comprises features
(e.g., lateral line system and posterior spinal cord) that are
exclusively larval traits lost at metamorphosis. Second, the
tadpole has nervous elements (e.g., limb motor neurons and
the corpus of the cerebelium) that apparentiy are not important in tadpoles but will become functional in adults. Third,
the tadpole nervous system includes cells (e.g., motor trigeminal ceiis) that perform one function in tadpoles and are
reworked at metamorphosis to perform a new function in
adults. Findy and perhaps most remarkably, a majority of
the ceiis, especidy in higher order nuclei, are not known
to change during metamorphosis. These cells may function
appropriately within the demands of both the tadpole and
adult worlds.
The brains of tadpoles are not d alike. Variation appears
to be common even within the limited number of tadpoles
that have been studied. Orton's (1944) tadpole types offer a
starting point for comparative neurobiologists interested in
the ecological and phylogenetic bases (but see chap. 4) of
neuronal variation in these animais, and the diversity described in chapter 12 provides the mileposts for such investigations. Despite enormous efforts by many researchers to
provide basic information about the organization and functioning of the anuran nervous system, we are only now
beginning to understand how tadpoles integrate nervous
system development and differentiation, and how it is altered to fit the demands of different environments. Learning by tadpoles and how this is modified at metarnorphosis is poorly studied (e.g., Munn 1940a, b; Punzo 1991;
Strickler-Shaw and Taylor 1991; Youngstrom 1938).
INTEGRATION
Summary
There are two significant generalizations that can be drawn
hom a review of the nervous and sensory systems of anuran
tadpoles. Few taxa have been examined, but there are many
variations exhibited even among this small number. Future
studes of a more ecologically and phylogenetically &verse
assemblage will most certainly turn up other interesting patterns. The second generality arises from the profound and
abrupt remodeling of the neural circuitry at metamorphosis
(also chap. 5). In a Me cycle that includes a profound metamorphosis from an aquatic larva to a terrestrial adult, questions about adult influences on tadpole nervous system morphology must be considered in addition to the more obvious
questions of neural structure and hnction in tadpoles. Several conclusions can be drawn. First, tadpole nervous systems have elements (e.g., lateral line system) that typically
function only in tadpoles. Second, tadpole nervous systems
have other elements (e.g, limb motor neurons) that are not
important to tadpoles but are important in adults. Third,
other elements (e.g, trigeminal motor neurons) are reworked at metamorphosis to perform new functions in
adults. Fourth, the majority of neurons are not known to
change during metamorphosis. This latter uniformity is re-
169
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I express my greatest respect and appreciation to those
whose work I have cited here and apologize to those whose
work I have inadvertently slighted either through oversimplhcation or omission. I thank D. Pratt, who produced the
original artwork, and S. Lannoo, who redrew the figures
borrowed from other sources. Acknowledgments to R. J.
Wassersug, K. Nishikawa, K. Hoff, and D. Townsend (my
ex-labmates in Richard Wassersug's lab at Dalhousie University) and to R. Altig, R. McDiarmid, J. Eastman, and
B. Bock for their comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.
This chapter is contribution number 452 from the Iowa
Lakeside Laboratory and was supported by NIH Grant
NS30702-01 and a grant from the Ball State University
Office of Research and Sponsored Programs.
ENDOTROPHIC
ANURANS
Development and Evolution
Giseile Thibaudeau and Ronald Altig
Introduction
The quote from Raff (1987) concerns the development of
sea urchins, but the conspicuous parallels during the evolution of direa development in sea urchins and endotrophic
anurans are significant. Endotrophic anurans obtain their
entire developrnentai energy from parentai sources, most
commonly vitellogenic yoik (Altig and Johnston 1989), and
the developmentai patterns of these anurans deviate in many
ways from those of typicai anurans. The evolutionary history
of the various forms of endotrophic development and the
pertinente of understanding these developmentai modes relative to anuran systematics still are debated (see chap. 11and
Bogart 1981). Lutz (1948:29) made a fascinating projection: "As long as anuran taxonomy continues to be based
exclusively on adult morphology they will be left aside in
establishing phylogeneticai relationships." Many papers pertinent to understanding the evolution of endotrophy in anurans involve ancillary subjeas or deai with other organisrns
(table 7.1)
Aitig and Johnston (1989) deined the following six developmentai guiids of endotrophs: (1) viviparous (after exhaustion of viteiiogenic yoik, fetus in the ovidua feeds on
oviducal materiais to complete a modified development before birth as a froglet), (2) ovoviviparous (embryo completes a modified development in the oviduct via only oogenic energy sources and is birthed as a froglet; see Blackburn
1994 for opinions on terminology), (3) direct developer
(embryo completes highly modified development via oogenic energy sources in an oviposited egg that is not intimately
associated with a parent's body and hatches as a froglet),
(4) paraviviparous (ernbryo completes a modified development via oogenic energy sources in a site other than the reproductive traa of the mother and is "born" as a froglet),
(5) exoviviparous (embryo develops via oogenic energy
sources in a terrestriai egg before the hatchhg moves to a
site usually in or on the maie parent's body and a froglet
eventually is birthed from that site), and (6) nidicolous (eggs
oviposited terrestrially, and embryo develops from oogenic
energy sources to produce various sons of free-living,
nonfeeding larvae). The nidicolous and direa development
modes are more common than other endotrophic guiids. Diversity is highest among the nidicolous group where various
developmentai patterns provide a range of morphotypes; at
the unnlodified end of this continuum an entire tadpole
morphotype is produced. Near the other end of the continuum, there are various forms of embryos with progressive
losses of typicai tadpole features.
If endotrophy occurs in a presently recognized genus,
usually all species involved are in one guild; exceptions
E N D O T R O P H I C ANURANS
include Eleutherodactylus (teirnatobine leptodactylid, 2 endotrophic guilds), Gastrotheca (hemiphractine hylid, 1 endotrophic and 1 exotrophic guild; Matthews 1957), Mantidadylus (manteiiine rhacophorid, 1 endotrophic and severai
exotrophic guilds), and Mgophys (megophryid, 1 endotrophic and 1exotrophic guild). Arnong microhylids, endotrophv occurs in 6 of 10 subfamilies and is ~ervasivein 4 of
thiseiall brevicipitine (Africa) and asterophbnine and genyophrynine (Australopapua) frogs have direct development.
All cophylines (Madagascar) are nidicolous with similar
morphologies, aithough embryos of Stump*
seem to have
a different developmentai trajectory. These observations
should not be used to imply anything about the evolution
of endotro~hvwithin these lineages.
"
The characterization of a taxon as endotrophic often is
based solely on the presence of a small clutch of large, usually
nonpigmented ovarian eggs. Based on known relationships
benveen egg size, pigmentation, and the occurrence of tadpoles, this criterion should be employed cautiously. Even
though more than 1,000 species in more than 90 genera and
11 famrlies are involved and data have appeared over a span
of more than 225 years (e.g., Bavay 1873; Bello y Espinosa
1871; Fermin 1765; Spallanzani 1785), developmental data
on endotrophic anurani generally are sparse to absent. There
has been little standardization in terrninology, staging systems, and information presented. The majority of this information is derived from~hutherodactylus(telmtobiine leptodactylid), Gastrotheca (hemiphractine hylid -even though
1
171
the most cornmonly studied species in fact produces tadpoles) and Nectophrynoies (bufonid). The only complete
staging table of an endotroph is based onE. coqui (Townsend
and Stewart 1985). and considerable data on other Eleutherodadylw make th developmental patterns of this genus the
best understood. Salthe and Mecham (1974) suggested that
direct development of Eleutherodactylus may represent the
most advanced type of endotrophy, although this idea may
only reflect the paucity of data for other taxa and our understanding of the evolution of the various forms ofendotrophy. Primarily through the work of Eugenia De1 Pino
(e.g., 1975, 1989a, 1996; De1 Pino et ai. 1992) and her colleagues, the unique development of hemiphractine hylids,
based primarily on the genus Gastrotheca, is aiso well documented.
The first part of this chapter is a collation of mformation
on the development of endotrophs (tables 7.2-7.3; figs.
7.1-7.2) based on a common terminology and the staging
systems of Townsend and Stewart (1985; direct developers)
and Gosner (1960; nidicolous larvae). In table 7.4 we standardize stages of Townsend and Stewart (1985) with three
other systems involving Eleutherodactylus. Townsend and
Stewart (1985:432, table 3) compared stages and developmental times of eight other species of Eleutherodactylus with
those of E. coqui. Stages of Gastrotheca hbambae (De1 Pino
and Escobar 1981) can be standardized against Gosner
stages (table 7.5). In species of Gastrotheca that do not have
tadpoles, a modified staging scheme is needed at least for
Table 7.1 Summary of anciary subjects, often pertaiiung to organisms other than amphbians, that couid have a notable
impact on various studies of endotrophic anurans
Subject
Developmental regulation
Evolution of viviparity
Evolution of viviparity and egg retention
Hybridization of ovo- and viviparous lizards
Developmental vs. evoluuonary rates
Fertilization mode and parental care
Parenta1 care in Eleutheroda~lz~s
Froglet transport in Eleutheradaqlus
Reproductive energy docation/viviparous Lizard
Multigene families regulate development
Ontogeny/phylogeny relationships
Reproductive strategies in heterogeneous habitats
Regulatory geries and development
Evolution of viviparity in fishes
Evolutionaq loss of feeding larvae in an echinoderm
Evolution of larval types in invertebrates
Developmental energy use in echinoids
Maternal-fetal oxygen transport in lower vertebrates
Evolution of viviparity
Immunological/endocrinologicalproblems in viviparity
Maternal body volume constrains viviparity
Costs of viviparity in scorpions
New hypothesis for evolution of viviparity
Loss of larval types in invertebrates
Evolution of direct developmeiit in salamanders
Evolutionaq significance of fetal maintenance
Phylogenesis of direct development and viviparity
Evolutionaq scenario of viviparity
Evolution of oviducd viviparity and egg retention
Referente
Alberch 1982,1985,1987
Amboroso 1968
Andrews and Rose 1994
Arrayago et al. 1996
Arthur 1982
Beck 1998
Bourne 1997, 1998
Diesel et al. 1995
Doughty and Shtne 1998
Dressler and Grusse 1988
Fink 1982
Giesel 1976
Gluecksohn-Waelsch 1987
Guiiiette 1987
Hart 1996
Havenhand 1993
Hoegh-Guidberg and Emlet 1997
Ingerman 1992
Mathies and Andrews 1996
Medewar 1953
Q u d s and Shine, 1995, 1996
L. R. Shaffer and Formanowicz 1966
Shtne 1995
Strathmann 1978
D. B. W&e and Hanken 1996
M. H . Wake 1977
M. H. Wake 1989
M. H . Wake 1993b
M. H . Wake 1993c
172
Table 7.2 Alphabetical list of f d e s and genera including species (number of species in parentheses) known or suspected of being endotrophs.
More detailed data for some taxa appear in table 7.3.
Arthroleptidae
Arthroleptinae: Avthroleptis ( 12)
Bombinatoridae: Barbounrla (2)
Brachycephalidae: Brachycephalw (2) and Pyllaphyne (1)
(part, 3 out of 217 species may be endotrophs, at least under some circumstances)CrepiBufonidae:Altiphtynoides ( l ) ,Andinuphtyne (3), BU$J
+h~yne ( 1), Didynamipus (1), Frostiw (l), Laurentophtyne ( l ) , Metaphtyniscus (1), Nectophtyne (2), Nectophynoides (5), Nimbaphynoidez (2),
Oreophymlla (6), Osmnophtyne (6), Pelophlyne (8), Rhamphophph-e (8), Tmebella (2), and WokentoIffinu(2)
Dendrobatidae: Colostethus (part, 3 out of 90)
Hylidae
Hemiphractinae: Ctyptobatrachus (3), Fectonotus (5, feeding occurs under some circumstances in some species), Gar~votheca(part, 27 out of 43
species),Hemiphracbus (5), and Stejania (7)
Leiopelmatidae:Lehelma (3)
, .
Lep~odactylidae
Leotodactvlinae:Adenomem (oart. unknown number out of 6) and Vanwlinius (1)
~eimatobihae:Adelophtyne
~tycholos(2), Cycloramphus (1 out of 25 species):~ischidodactvlzbs(2), Ekutherodactylus (517), EuparkereUu (4),
Eupsophus (8), Geobatrachus (I), Holoaden (2), Ischnomema (4), Phlynopus (20),Phyllonartes (4), Phyzelaphtyne (I), and Z d m n w (3)
Megophqidae: Mgophtys (part, 1 out of 24 species)
Microhylidae
Asterophryinae:Asterophtys (I), Batyoenys (7), Callulops (13), Hylophorbus (I),Mantophtyne (3),Pherohapsr ( l), Xenobatrachus (17), and &mrhina (6)
Brevicipitinae: Baebreviceps (I), Breviceps (13), Callulina ( l ) , ProbrePiceps (3), Spelmophryne (1)
Cophyiinae:Anohnthyla (4), Cophyla ( l ) ,Madeccmophtyne (I), Platypelis (9), Pbthohntohyla (14), Rhombophyne (I), and Stump@ (6)
Genyophqmnae: Aphantophlyne (3), Copiada (5), Choerophtyne (I), Cophixalus (28), Genyophtyne (l), Oveophtyne (24), and Sphenophlyne (24)
Melanobatrachinae:Melanobatrdus (1) and Parhoplophtyne (1)
Microhyhae: Adehes ( l ) ,Alberictls (3), Arcmomer ( l ) , Gastrophynoidez ( l ) , Hyophtyne (l), kzluphtynus (lO), Myemiella (I), PhyneUu (I), Synaptumnus (3), and Syncope (2)
Myobatrachidae
Limnodynastinae: Kyaranus (3) and Philmia (1)
Myobatrachinae:Arenophtyne (10),Rrsa (I), Btyobatrachus (I), Geocvinia (7), Myobatrachus (I), and Rheobatrachus (2)
Pipidae
Pipinae: Pipcr (part, 1 out of 7 species)
Ranidae
Petropedetinae: Anhydroph~e(1) and Avthroleptella (6)
Raninae: Batrachyiades ((8, Ceratobatrachus ( l ) , Discodeles (5), Palmatorappia (I), Phtynohn (I), Plntymantis (42), and Tayiurana (2)
Rhacophoridae
Manteiiinae:Mantzdactylus (part, 6 and 7 in each of two species groups out of 61 species)
Philautinae: Philautus (87, unknown number are endotrophs)
Rhinodermatidae: Rhinodma (2)
Sooglossidae:Nesomantis (1) and Sooglossus (2)
L
(T),
ENDOTROPHIC ANURANS
173
Table 7.3 Summary of breeduig biology of endotrophic anurans. Enig = ecomorphological guild (Aitig and Johnston 1989): DD = direct developer, EV = exoviviparous, NI = nidicolous, OV = ovoviviparous, PV = paraviviparous, and VI = viviparous; Mod = mean ovum diameter,
mm; Clutch = eggs/dutch; Deve = developmentai time, days; Site = developmentai site: UO = under objects, IB = in burrow; ES = elevated
sites; OV = ovidud-ovoviviparous, IS = in stomach of femaie, BS = in back skin of female, 0 B = on back skin of femaie, IP = in partiai or
complete dorsai pouch of female, VI = oviducai-viviparous;VS = in maie vocal sac, ID = in dorsal pouch of maie, and OM = on back of maie;
Hatch = hatchling SVL, mm; and Reference = a pertinent referente.
Taon
..irthroleptidae, Arthroleptinae
Arthrokptis
msculum
poecilonotuc
wahlbmgi
Bufonidae
Altiphrynoides
maicomi
Didynamipus
sjoestedti
Laurentophyne
parkeri
Nectophyne
afia
Nectophymides
tomeiri
Nimbaphvides
ocddentalis
Omoph7yneUa
n&va
Pelophyne
brevtpes
Dendrobatidae
Colostethus
chakopis
stephani
Hylidae, Hemiphractinae
C~toba~dchus
jkhmzanni
Fk-ctomtus
fitzgmaldi
goeldii
Emg
Mod
Clutch
Dev,
Site
Hatch
Referente
DD
DD
DD
NI
H. H. Wake 1980
DD
Grandison 1981
DD
Grandison 1981
NI
OV
Orton 1949
VI
DD
NI
NI
NI
PV
Ruthven 1915
NI
hTI
ohausi
NI
flgmaeus
NI
Gastrotheca
cwatophryes
PV
christiani
PV
ernestoi
PV
mfira
PV
testudinae
PV
weiniundi
PV
Hemiphractus
scutatus
PV
Stejania
scalae
PV
Leiopelmatidae
Leiupelma
archeyi
EV
hamiltoni
EV
hochstetteri
NI
Leptodactylidae, Leptodactylinae
Adenomera
hylaedaqh
NI
mamorata
NI
Leptodactylidae,Telmatobiinae
Eleutherodaqlus
abbotti
DD
atkinsi
DD
aua'unti
DD
augusti
DD
cooki
DD
G I S E L L E T H I B A U D E A U A N D R O N A L D ALTIG
174
Table 7.3 contznued
Taxon
Emg
coguz
co~ltutus
dimidiatus
fmleri
gossei
hedricki
inoptatus
jasperi
johnstonei
martinzcens~
nnrutus
nubhla
pams
pa"zae
planirostris
pwto&nsic
thorectes
parians
varieyi
wetmorez
Eupsophus
roseus
taeniatw
vittatus
Zachaenus
pamltrr
Microhylidae, Brevicipitinae
Breviqs
dpemus
Microhylidae, Cophylinae
Anodonthyla
bouiengeri
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
OV
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
DD
NI
NI
NI
DD
Lutz 1944b
W Y ~
Mod
Clutch
Dev,
Site
Hatch
Reference
DD
NI
phylioahqla
NI
2Mademsophyne
truebae
Platypelis
grandis
NI
Piethodontohyla
notostim
NI
Rbombophyne
testudo
NI
Stumpjia
grandis
NI
Microhylidae, Genyophryninae
Cophixalus
parkeri
DD
Oreophyne
annulata
DD
Microhylidae, Microhylinae
Calaphynus
pleurostgma
NI
Myeniella
micvops
DD
Synapturanus
salsmen
NI
Srncope
antenmi
NI
Myobatrachidae, Limnodynastinae
Krarranus
sphagnhlus
NI
Philoria
j?osti
NI
Myobatrachidae, Myobatrachinae
Arenophyne
rotunda
DD
Blommers-Schlosser 1975
Glaw and Vences 1992
Glaw and Vences 1992
Blommers-Schiosser 1975
Blommers-Schiosser 1975
Glaw and Vences 1992
Glaw and Vences 1992
De Bavay 1993
Littiejohn 1963
E N D O T R O P H I C ANURANS
175
Emg
Mod
Clutch
Assa
darlingtoni
Myobatrachus
gouldii
Rheobatnubus
silw
Pipidae, Pipinae
Pipa
pipa
Ranidae, Petropedetinae
Anhydruphqwe
ratlayi
Arthmleptella
hewitti
lightfooti
Ranidae, Raninae
Ceratobatrachus
guentheri
Platymantis
guentheri
hamiue
meyeri
Rhacophoridae, Philautinae
Phiuutus
llcsobrachius
schmackeri
Rhinodermatidae
Rhivwdemza
danvinii
Sooglossidae
Sooglosus
gardim'
Dev,
Site
Hatch
Reference
Ehmann and Swan 1985
J. D. Roberts 1981
Tyler and Davies 1983
176
E N D O T R O P H I C ANURANS
Fig. 7.1. Embryos and hatchling o f E h t h e m ~ L ~ m q uStages
i . are
fiom table of Townsend and Stewart (1985). (A) Embryo, dorsai view,
head upward, limbs buds visible, Townsend/Stewart 4. (B) Embryo,
lateral view, removed fiom egg capsules, Townsend/Stewart 6.
(C) Embryo, ventral view, within egg capsules, Townsend/Stewart 12.
(D) Embryo, lateral view, within egg capsules, Townsend/Stewart 12.
(E) Embryo, stained with a rnonoclonai antibody for Type I1 coiiagen,
most dark areas are cartilage, Townsend/Stewart 9. (F) Hatchling, lateral view of head, stained for cadage.
Fig. 7.2. Embryos of different endotrophic fiogs. Stages are fiom the
table of Townsend and Stewart (1985), except in (D). (A) Ccratubamzchw&u~nthcn'(Ranidae, Raninae), lateral view, Townsend/Stewart 13.
(B) Gmtheca sp. (Hylidae, Hemiphractinae), venaal view, beii giiis
(Microhylidae,
visible, Townsend/Stewart 15. (C) Copi&-m
177
olous form, resembles that in Ranu (J. A. Moore 1961), although the eventual neurai plate appears narrower and
shorter.
Early Emlnyology
Hemiphractine hylids foiiow a nove1 pattern of early development. Although Gastrotbeca riubambae eventuaiiy produces a tadpole (De1 Pino and Eiinson 1983; De1 Pino and
Loor-Vela 1990; Eiinson and De1 Pino 1985), an embryonic
disc forms as a result of gastruiation. The embryo proper is
derived from this disc in a pattern similar to that seen in
birds and reptiles (see Gatherer and De1 Pino 1992). Involution is limited, and the primitive gut is lunited to a smaii
cavity at one end of the embryo. In most genera the yok
178
Lynn/Lutz
L~
Sampson
24
23.5
23
22
21
19
18
17
16
14
13
12
11.5
11
10.5
10
9
6
I1
I11
I
-
Iv
-
ENDOTROPHIC ANURANS
179
along the venter or lateraiiy along the side of the ernbryo, tooth has not been reported frorn rnernbers of any other geusuaiiy to the lefi. In other species, the tail and ins are dis- nus. Advanced embryos of Stefaniagoini have a srnaii, triantorted so as to appear somewhat like a rnushroorn whose cap gular, keratinized tubercle in the middle of the upper jaw
covers the posterior hemisphere of the ernbryo. A section of that Dueiiman and Hoogrnoed (1984) thought might be
the tail inat about midlength appears firrnly adherent to the a remnant of the upper jaw sheath. Based on the location
inner surface of the egg jelly in E. inoptatus (personal obser- of the tubercle and the age of the ernbryos, this structure
vation). Other species of Eleutherodactylus (e.g., E. hazelue may be an egg tooth. An unidenthed leptodactylid ernbryo
and E. meyeri) and frogs in severai other guilds (e.g., Asa, (R. W. McDiarrnid, personal cornmunication) has an apparCeratobatrachus, several Gastrotheca,Myobatrachus, Nectophry- entiy anaiogous keratinized structure on the symphysis of
noides tornieri) have srnaii tails with ins srnaii to absent. the protruding lower jaw.
Embryos of Discodeles opisthodun lack a tail, and there appear
to be no data to support the staternent of Rostand (1934)
that the tail of Nectophrynoides is hollow. The tail fins of di- No vestiges of tadpole rnouthparts are known in E. q u i or
rect developers are thin and nonpigmented, and the blood other Eleutherodactylus, aithough a detailed developrnental
vessels are obvious. Whether or not there is a suficient in- study of the rnouth area is lacking. Vestiges of oral structures
crease in vascularity to suggest a specific respiratory func- are present in some hemiphractine hylids (Wassersug and
tion for the tail is debatable. De Vilhers (1929b) found no Dueliman 1984), Arthrolepteliu (Lambiris 1988a, b), and
specialized vascularization in the fin of Arthro&ptella and Nimbaphqwoides occidentalis (Lamotte and Xavier 1972); the
concluded that gas exchange is enhanced only by increased iatter u&ors sunnested that the rnouth~artsin fetuses of
surface area. Warren (1922) stated that embryos of Anhy- Nectuphrynoides were somehow used in feeding in utero.
drophryne ratcrayi developing from smaiier eggs had larger Arthrolepteliu has d r a - and suprarostal cartilages (Lambiris
tas than embryos developing from larger eggs. Even 1988a, b; Van Dijk 1966), and the occurrence of rnouthpart
though Townsend and Stewart (1985) intirnated poten- remnants in this genus agrees with Elinson's ideas (1990)
tiai ecological, developrnental, and systernatic correlations that the typical lack of rnouthparts results frorn the absence
among the number and size of gilis and tail morphology, of the proper inducing sources. Embryos of Cycloramphus
dehtive data are lacking.
stejnegeri have an aitnost complete oral apparatus, and those
of Rhinoderma have nascent tooth ridges on the lower laIntgument and E
m Tooth
bium (Cei 1987).In direct-developing species of Gastrotheca,
IMost endotrophic eggs and ernbryos are nonpigrnented and pigmented rnouthparts forrn but as development proceeds
appear white, yellow, or orange. Those of Pipapipa and some they undergo changes associated with metamorphosis and
nidicolous forrns are exceptions, and Noble (1917) noted produce the mouth configuration of a frog (Wassersug and
that early ernbryos of Cryptobatrachussfhrmanni are black; D u e h a n 1984). Nectophylnoides tomieri has a ridge at the
based on some of our observations, we suggest that ths col- place the lower labium Godd forrn in an exotrophi~tadpole,
oration is a preservation artifact. Ernbryos of Ebutherodac- and the sides of the upper jaw overhang the lateral parts of
~Lusmqui and probably rnost other taxa begin to deposit the lower jaw (Orton 1949). Most nidicolous cophyiine larpigment on the head and along the dorsal rnidlme by Town- vae have reduced. soft rnouth~artsthat resemble those of the
send/Stewart 5. In subsequent stages, chrornatophores exotrophic scaphiophrynine Scaphiophiyne; larvae of Stumpdifferentiate lateraiiy but do not go beyond the lirnits of the fia do not have such rnouthparts and mouth developrnent
body waii. By Townsend/Stewart 12 aii but a sliver of yolk proceeds more directiy toward that of a frog.
is enclosed by the body waii, and the entire yoik rnass is pigEiinson (1990) suggested that the lack of rnouthparts rernented by stage 13. Pigment is rnost intense dorsaiiy and sults frorn the absence of the inducing cartilages or ectoderlateraiiy, and characteristic patterns on the head and legs are mal cornpetence, or both, but it is obvious that detailed,
evident by Townsend/Stewart 14. As a generality, the adult corn~arativedevelo~mentdstudies are needed to underpattern is present by hatching in direct developers but ap- stand the developmental patterns more effeaively. Adhesive
pears later in other endotrophic froglets. The tail muscle and glands apparentiy are lacking in aii nonnidicolous endoins are typicaiiy nonpigmented.
trophs and often are nonfunctional in nidicolous forms (e.&
In species of E&utherodugvLus, a single keratinized egg Cei and Capurro 1958; Formas and Pugn 1978; Formas
tooth forms on the skin adjacent to the premaxillary syrn- and Vera 1980, Eupsophus roseus and E. vittatus; Akala and
physis late in Townsend/Stewart 12. The conical tooth proj- Brown 1957, Pephryne brepipes).The less-modifiedernbryos
ects verticaiiy from its insertion and terrninates in a single or of Philautus (Aicaia and Brown 1982) and Philoria (Littlebiid point (Hardy 1984; Lutz 1944a; Noble 1926a). The john 1963) have funaional adhesive glands.
single point of the conical egg tooth of E. urichi from Trinidad projects anteriorly. Differences in the number of points Gills, Operculum, Spiracle, and Respiratoly Systems
and the projecting direction suggest the employrnent of Pharyngeal slits apparentiy are absent in ali endotrophs. One
different motions during hatching or differences in the char- or two pairs of smali gilis with fimbriae present as not much
acteristics of the egg jelly. Except for the ranid Discodeles opzs- more than terminal knobs and bumps are present for less
thodun (Alcala and Brown 1957; Boulenger 1886), an egg than one-third of development in E. coqui, and the number
VV
180
ENDOTROPHIC ANURANS
bryos ofArthrolepteLla have neuromasts on the head (De Villiers 1929b; Lambiris 1988a, b). The neural tube is closed by
Townsend/Stewart 3 in Eleutherodu~luscoqui, primary brain
divisions are present by stage 6, and ali parts of the brain are
present in correct proportions by stage 9 (also Hughes
1959; Lynn 1940b). Schlosser and Roth (1997b) studied
the modified development of the peripheral nervous system
of E. wqui.
181
first ossifications to appear in Eleutherodadylus are in the appendicular skeleton at Townsend/Stewart 12. The ischium,
sternum, and episternum ossi@ during metamorphosis in
Rana but show no ossification at hatchmg in Eleutherodactylus. The angular, mentomeckelian, and septomaxilla appear
later in development than in exotrophic tadpoles. An embryo of Eleutherod#ylus slightly before hatchmg is very similar to a ranid tadpole at the completion of metamorphosis,
although they each arrived at tliis state by different routes.
Dbestive, Uro~enital,and Reproductive Systems
Cranial elements associated with larval mouthparts are abThe prirnitive gut separates the early embryo from the large sent. Swanepoel(1970,Brevi~psadspenus) specifically examo k mass, ends b h d l y anteriorly, and is open posteriorly ined the ontogeny of the chondrocranium and nasal sacs,
via a persistent blastopore. Rupture of the oropharyngeal and Haas (1996) reported heterochronic changes in the demembrane during Townsend/Stewart 9 aiiows communica- velopment of the head of herniphractine hylids.
tion between the buccal cavity and the exterior. Rapid absorption of yok by the endodermal ceils lining the gut Physwlogy
causes the di~estivetract to become convoluted and filied Burggren (1985) suggested that conditions of O, CO,, and
with yok. O i y the anterior and posterior ends remain hol- pH witliin aquatic egg masses are not as severe ai has been
low throughout embryogenesis, and the intestine never suggested (e.g., R. M. Savage 1935). Bradford and Seymour
forms a coil mical of tad~oles.Warren (1922) stated that (1985, 1988a, b), Gollman and Gollman (1993a), A. A.
the gut ofdk(ydruphiyne Idevelops first ai the kterior and Martin and Cooper (1972), Seymour and Bradford (1995),
posterior ends. Jorquera et al. (1982, Rhinudemza spp.) and Seymour et al. (1991a, b, 1995), Seyrnour and Roberts
Teran and Cerasuolo (1988, Gastrothecagrmilis) also studied (1991), and Shoemaker and McClanahan (1973) supplied
larval gut development. Vilter and Lugand (1959) noted pertinent data on various facets of intracapsular metaboprecocious development of the alimentary tract in Nectophiy- lism and development of terrestrial eggs. Caiiery and Elinson
nuides and suggested that the small f e m "drinks" a nutritive (1996) examined the urea-cycle enzymes during ontogeny
substance se&ted bv the oviducal e~ithelium.Labial fila- of Eleutherodaa$us wqui, and Alcocer et al. (1992) determents found on these embryos may be specializations to aid mined that ureotelism was the prevailing mode of nitrogen
in the stimulation and absorption of oviducal secretions (La- excretion in larvae of Gastrotheca riobambae.
motte and Xavier 1973; M. H . Wake 1980,1982).
Endotrophs take 13 days to 9 months to hatch, and the
Three pairs of convoluted tubules form the pronephros, developmental period of Eleutherodu&us coqui ranges from
and a straight tube leading to the Wolffian duct forms the 17.1 days at 24.6"C to 26.3 days at 21.1C (Townsend and
mesonephros at Townsend/Stewart 6. By stage 9 the meso- Stewart 1985, 1986). A decrease of 1C increased develnephros has enlarged, and by stage 13 the pronephros is opmental time by 2.5 days. Their Q, of 3.92 is higher
nonfunctional (Lynn 1942; also see Meseguer et al. 1996; than any of 15 species of temperate-region frogs except
Selenka 1882). The urinary bladder diverticulum from the Rrcaphus. This large value suggests that direct developers
cloaca and the liver and pancreas diverticula from the gut are have a greater sensitivity to environmental temperatures and
present by stage 6. In the next few stages, the liver becomes reduced tolerance to thermal deviations. Wager (1986)
lobed and the gabladder is formed. The gonadal ridge ap- noted that Brm'ceps adspemus takes about 2 months to hatch
pears between Townsend/Stewart 6-13. Chbon (1962, E. and Anhydrophiyne rattrayi and Avthroleptis wahlberg-i take 4
martinicensis) and Larnotte and Xavier (1973) and Lamotte weeks.
et al. (1973, Nimbaphynuides occidentalis) discussed gonad
Eleutheroda~luscoqui can develop in water of low tonicity from fertilization through hatching (Elinson 198%).
development.
Cei (1980:281) cornmented on the development of Ba- Wager (1986) noted that Anhydrophryne larvae drowned if
trachyh taeniata as foliows: "After 15-20 days [when em- placed in water, and Lynn (1948) found that embryos of E.
bryos are intracapsular] solid wiutish wastes can be seen in ricordi raised in water grew more slowly than those in air
the taill' Cei speculated that tliis storage was similar to that unless the jeily was removed. The development of embryos
of a cleidoic egg. He did not state if the observed tadpoles of Gastrotheca riobambae (De1 Pino et al. 1975) in water or
lvere alive or preserved, and if this whte material is differ- Ringer's depended on the stage of development. Heart rate
ent from the white precipitate that commonly occurs in is about 12 beatslmin at 30C in Platynzantkpehensis at
preserved tadpoles, rther investigations certady are war- about Townsend/Stewart 7 (Atoda 1950); Burggren et ai.
(1990) presented data on the developmental changes in carranted.
diac physiology of E. coqui. Larvae of Batrmhyh start development in what appears to be a nidicolous mode but spend
The sequence of postcranial ossifications in Eleutherodactylus most of their development as exotrophic tadpoles.
is similar to that of &na, although these bones o s s 4 along
The thyroid gland differentiates by Townsend/Stewart
with cranial ossifications (Hanken and Summers 1988; 13. Tail degeneration is stimulated by thyroid hormones
Lynn 1940a) that are highly modified from the norm. The (Hughes 1966; Lynn and Peadon 1955), while limb ini-
182
Evolution of Endotrophy
Endotrophy was attained through modifications of the normai amphibian developmental prograni (also see chap. 11).
We do not imply that ali lmeages with similar development
necessarily were produced by the same evolutionaq pathway, but certain common denominators are present. The fact
that these alterations have occurred repeatedly with similar
results suggests provocative ideas about potential evolutionary and genetic mechanisms (see Fang and Elinson 1996).
All obsewed "intermediates" would not have had to occur as
a progression; those that appear to be intermediates between
typicai amphibian development and the more derived conditions should suggest probable sequences of changes and
Dromote an understanding: of develo~mentaiconstraints.
thers have used this reasckig to illu&ate sequential aiterations of breeding modes of amphibians (e.g., Grandison
1978; Heyer 1969, 1973a; M. H. Wake 1982) and other
taxa (e.g., RafF 1987; Strathmann 1978, 1993; Strathmann
et ai. 1992). In some circumstances the intermediates seemingly would be at a disadvantage by not expressing the appropriate phenotype for either option. In the case of anuran
development, an exotrophic tadpole, a profoundly modified
developmental pattern as in Eleutherodactylus, and many
cases &at apper as intermediate morphologies along the
nidicolous continuum ali produce a froglet. Because of
the duai Me-history pattern of anurans, the developmentai
exdusion of features uniaue to tad~olescauses elaborate
changes in larvai developmentai patterns with no effect on
the adult. Although the understanding of development of
endotro~hsis based on rather few data involvinn a smali assemblage of taxa, we suggest several ideas that differ from
current dogrna.
Genetic on-off signals (e.g., morphogen production and
distribution. cellular comDetence and induction., Dattern formation) d u e n c e the sequence of events or pattern of development. The period during which an event(s) occurs reflects
the rate at which a develo~mentaievent or Drocess occurs:
Genetic mechanisms are of prime irnportance in considering
I
.I
sequence of developmental events, whiie abiotic factors;particularly temperature, often are more instrumental in immediate considerations of altering developmental period. Aiterations in developmental sequence were instrumental in the
evolution of endotrophy, while alterations in developmental
period probably had a rninor influence on these unusual developmental patterns. Even cursory comparisons show that
endotrophy is not simply a shortened or telescoped sequence
of events. Developmental periods of typical anurans from
egg to metamorph range from 9 days (e.g., Forge and Barbault 1977, Bufopentoni) to 3 or more years (e.g., Metter
1967, Ascaphus truei) with inconsequential changes in general developmental sequence; both extremes exceed the
known developmentai periods of endotrophs, and in the examples given, differences in sequence reflect habitat (Nodzenski and Inger 1990) and not development. A common
staging table will work in either case.
A reasonably consistent developmentai sequence in early
stages of ali exotrophs eventualiy results in a wide diversity
of morphologies (e.g., the intricate oral apparatus) because
of developmentai modifications later in ontogeny. Because
most endotrophs lack the oral apparatus and have less variation in tail morphology compared with exotrophic tadpoles,
the morphologicai variation in endotrophs is lower than in
exotrophs. Conversely, the multiple times that endotrophy
has evolved in a number of lineages suggest that (1) the
genetic mechanisms involved are either relatively simple,
simply regulated, or likely to occur; (2) similar mechanisms
operated repeatedly to produce similar developmentai patterns; and (3) the mechanisms involved alterations in gene
regulation rather than mutations of structural genes. It
seems highly unhkely that homologous mutations of structurai genes would occur repeatedly in the proper sequence
in so many Merent lineages. If there has been a reversal
from endotrophy to exotrophy (e.g., Wassersug and Duellman 1984), gene regulation rather than structurai mutations
seems a more likely mechanism. We do not imply that the
process was not complicated; changes in the (1) development, genetics, and physiology of the egg and embryo and
(2) behavior, morphology, and physiology of the adult had
to be properly orchestrated (e.g., Xavier 1977). Based on the
obsewations that apparent intermediates between exotrophic and endotrophic development occur, that species of
Gastrotheca may produce either tadpoles or froglets, and that
a frog results from ali such developmentai variations, we reiterate that the examination of extant taxa will provide insight
into the probable patterns and mechanisms and aid in illustrating the developmentai aiterations. Depending on the
hierarchicai leve1 of developmental regulation that is postulated, ali lineages would not necessarily pass through the
same sequence of events. These presumed intermediate species should be placed in a sequence only for heuristic purposes, and they should not be viewed as incomplete attempts
(Lutz 1948) at terrestriai development. In hopes of stirnulating thoughts on the subject and coilection of pertinent materiais, we continue this discussion under the following three
topics: (1) two general pathways based on the presence
or absence of oviposition, (2) characteristics of exotrophs
ENDOTROPHIC ANURANS
that seem to imitate conditions found in early stages of nidicolous and direct developing endotrophs, and (3) changes
within the various forms of endotrophy.
Om-positwn and Endotr-phy
Although the changes most certainly occurred in concert, we
suggest that various alterations in oviposition were a fundamental factor in the evolution of endotrophy. Without egg
retention (= lack of oviposition), the associated changes in
both adult reproductive systems that d o w ovovivipary and
vivipary could not have arisen. Even so, the ovoviviparous
forms (e.g., Ehutherodu&lur ja'peri is more similar to direct
developers compared to some species of Nectophrynozdes,
which are more similar to nidicolous larvae) do not follow similar embryological patterns. If so, one would predict
that these conditions arose Merently; the condition in
Ehutherodu&lur rnay have involved the retention of a directdeveloping egg, while in Nectuphrynoides the changes involved the retention of an egg that would develop at some
point along the nidicolous continuum. Although these
differences do not suggest it, ovovivipary and vivipary also
could have evolved in sequence once oviposition was suppressed, or at least a series of ovoviviparous-likeconditions
(i.e., vary as to length of time retained) rnay have been intercalated into the evolution of vivipary.
The other forms of endotrophy involve a common oviposition pattern and moddied developmental patterns.
Hemiphractine hylids have highly modified breeding behaviors (i.e., fertilization foliowed by positioning of eggs) and a
unique embryology. Exovivipary, which essentidy involves
nidicolous larvae that are intimately tended by a parent,
could easiiy be derived from the normal nidicolous types by
moddication of either parental (e.g., Rhinudema) or larvai
(e.g., Assa, some Leiopelma, and some Sooglussus) behavior.
Negative geotaxis, perhaps modulated by a chemotactic response to material from the adult skin, would suKce in the
latter case.
Even though we do not have enough details of even morphological (much less genetic) development to make astute
predictions about the possible evolutionary steps leading to
the larval types along the nidicolous continuum, the developmental regulation that produced these forms is surely less
complex than that which produced direct development. At
least for the present discussion, we will consider nidicoly as
a potentiai precursor to direct development. A postulate of
where on the nidicolous continuum that direct development
rnight have arisen wiil be tenuous at best. In summary, hemiphractine hylids possess highly modified breeding biologies
and strangely different developmentai patterns that certainly
evolved via mechanisms different from d other endotrophs.
Other endotrophic forms rnay have similar developmentai
stages, and in the next section we present scenarios whereby
particularly nidicoly and then direct development might
have arisen from exotrophic development.
Environmentdy influenced variations in development are
important, but they ordy aiter developmentai period and not
183
developmentai sequence. Regardless of the embryonic period, exotrophic embryos typicdy hatch w i t h a narrow
range of stages centered at about Townsend/Stewart 22.
From hatching untii the tadpole stage at Gosner 25 (about
3% of develo~mentaltime and about four develo~mental
stages), the hatchling is particularly vulnerable, locomotes
slowly over short distantes by epidermal ciiia, and stabilizes
itselfwith a transitory adhesive gland. Yolk reserves support
development for about the first 22 stages, and perhaps 80%
of the developmental time commordy remains after yolk exhaustion; this period primariiy involves isometric growth
with minor developmentai change. A second period of development (i.e., metarnorphosis) comes at the end of larval
ontogeny. We first suggest ways in which exotrophic development might be altered without requiring changes in developmental sequence.
Initial developmental changes of exotrophs would affect
the period, and therefore the stage, to hatching. The embryo
could remain intracapsular during part or d of the time that
is normdy spent as a hatchling (Lamotte and Lescure
1977). "Late hatching" commordy accompanies oviposition
out of water, on the soii surface near water (e.g., Chirixalus
idwotocus, Ranagrayi), on leaves (e.g., centroenids, some
hyline and phyliomedusine hylids), and underground or under objects (e.g., some L e p t o ~ l u sPseudophyne;
,
see Alcala
1962). The development that ensues during the extended
intracapsular period enhances the probability of survival and
therefore the selection for oviposition out of water if egg
mortality is low (ordy 8.1% survival in Philuria; Malone
1985).If reduced oxygen concentration is the hatching stimulus (Petranka et ai. 1983), the increased oxygen concentration in an aeriai environment rnay d o w an extended intracapsular period by dowing the ihreshold concentration of
oxygen to be reached later in development. Higher oxygen
concentrations also rnay cause the hatching glands to develar, and secrete later than normal. Embrvos that hatch
"late.' often have erdarged gds (e.g., ~arnoheand Lescure
1977) presumably to accommodate the larger size and advanced development wMe con6ned in the jeliy. Embryos of
Ranagrayi my reach at least Gosner 25 $&r to hatching
(personal observation), and embryos of Geocrinia vitoriana
rnay arrest at stage 26 for 4 months if conditions are not
amenable to hatching (A. A. Martin and Cooper 1972).
Downie and Weir (1997) found that the response of tadpoles of Leptoh~lus$scur that were artlficidy induced to
arrest differed in growth and metamorphic response. The
longer the tadpoleS stayed in the foam, &e more~lowlythey
grew when released and a smder proportion eventudy
metamorphosed. The mean metamorphic size of those that
arrested for longer periods was greater than those that left
the foam earlier.butthe variabili6 was "
greater. Based on oviposition sites on land and vegetation out of water, embryos
of Dendrophryniscus minutus and Tachycnemis seychelhnsis rnay
also have-th capability to remain &tracapsdar for longLr
periods than normal. Researchers need to study the feedback
interactions that rnay exist among remaining yolk reserves,
stimulation of hatching, and developmentai stage at hatching. We argue that no dditional enirgy or alteration of de-
184
velopment wouid be needed to make these rninor developmental adjustments common to nonaquatic eggs, and &e
individual can reach Gosner 25 (i.e., a tadpole) in this
manner.
If particuiate food is not present, the tadpoles of Bufoper&enes metamorphose at a smaiier size but at the same time
as siblings that feed (Crump 1989b; aiso see Inger 1992b,
RhaccIphol"lts~auni;McDiarmid and Altig 1990, Bufo haematiticus; Weygoldt 1989, Flectonotus~oeldii).Seemingly there
are no data on the possibility of amphibian larvae absorbing
dissolved organic material (DOM; see Manahan 1990), and
bacteriai popuiations were not monitored in Crump's experiments. The ovum of B. peribenes is large and lightly pigmented and the clutch size is smaii for a Bufo of about 50.0
mm snout-vent length. Aitig and Johnston (1989) classified
B. penaienes as an exotroph because they considered exotrophy to be the primitive condition and feeding to be the likely
scenario foilowed in most natural cases. In the present context, one aiso couid consider B. pen3enes as a facuitative endotrovh residine: at the absolute teiminus of the nonmodified ind of t h l developmentai continuum of nidicolous
anurans (Altig and Johnston 1989). Therefore endotrophic
develovment is vossible without develovmentai modifications in species whose eggs are weil within the size range
and presumed energy content of exotrophs. B. penig-lenes has
sufficient energy in the egg, a function of maternal reproductive physiology, so that the resuiting offspring can survive to
metamorphosis without feeding, if that scenario is encountered in the environment. The benefits of this facuitative
form of develovment are obvious. and one has to wonder if
other species that develop rapidly in habitats with apparently
low productivity can respond similarly. Also, we suggest caution in subjectively equating the absence of visible aigal
growths with limited food availabhty. At least in dystrophic,
tropical pools, the detritai/fungal/bacterial component is
likely more important as a food source than photosynthetic
aigae. Similar cases occur in highiy ephemerai desert pools.
I
Chan~eswithin Endotrophs
The next step toward endotrophy wouid be to change the
facultative nonfeeding type (e.g., B. pen@nes) to an obligatory nonfeeding type (e.g.,Anodonthyla, Phibloria, Phynodon,
and Pethodontohyla).That is, an entire tadpole morphotype
that does not feed is produced, but one must be aware of
the danger of generaliiing based on incomplete knowledge
of the developmeiit of frogs with large eggs. A case in point:
Dueiiman and Gray (1983) showed that the tadpole of Fectonotusfitzgerali did not feed and metamorphosed in 5-20
days; they predicted that the tadpole of other Fbctonotzts
wouid respond similarly. Weygoldt (1989) reported that the
tadpoles of E~oeldiifeed readily and take 23 days to metamorphose. &o, the fetus of Nimbaphlynoides occidentalis
feeds from uterine secretions (Vilter and Lugand 1959), and
the embryos of Rhinuhmza darwini may feed from the lining
of the vocal pouch of the male (Goicoechea et ai. 1986).We
need to know more about comvarative visceral develovment
among members of various developmentai guilds. For ex-
ample, does the development of the intestine of Nectophlynoides spp. differ from that of Eeutheroductylus spp.?
The next step might involve the first changes in developmental sequence. Because structures lost by individuais in
the intermediate and modified parts of the nidicolous continuum occur oniy in embryos or tadpoles, the aduit phenotype is not dected. Considerably less than an entire tadpole
morphotype can produce a frog via metamorphosis, and development can proceed toward metamorphosis from an organism that resembles various stages of a typicai exotrophic
hatchling. A tadpole morphotype is mandatory oniy if feeding is mandatory because of developmentai energetics but
not for the production of a froglet. Whether eggs that develop into nidicolous larvae have more yoik or a higher yoik
density than eggs of exotrophs is not known, but some increased amount c e r t d y is expected. Patterns of phylogenetic and ontogenetic gain or loss (e.g., Aiberch and Gaie
1983; Thibaudeau and Aitig 1988) suggest that modifications of development that involve losses may occur in the
reverse order of ontogeny of typical species. We have reliable
information on the ontogeny of typicai embryos but lack
these details on a diversity of nidicolous forms. If these data
were avadable, we shouid be able to discern common mechanisms among lineages and make hypotheses about the development of various features or groups of features controiled
by a single inductive cascade (e.g., Elinson 1990). Early interruption of the cascade wouid prohibit the formation of aii
subsequent structures because of their developmental interdependente. Within the confines of little data, we specuiate
that a sequence of expected loss may be adhesive glands,
externai giiis, oral apparatus, coiled gut, lateral line, and spiracle. Conversely, Junc et ai. (1994) and Kaiser and Altig
(1994) couid not find concordance among character losses
of nidicolous lamae w i h the same genus of dendrobatids
(see E. N. Arnold 1994). The nidicolous embryos of Arthroleptellahewitti provide another iilustration. Probable vestiges of marginal papiliae at the corners of the mouth and
neuromasts are present, and infralabiai and supraiabiai cartilages, which are probably instrumental in the inductive cascade of mouthparts (Elinson 1990), are present. Detailed
studies of the developmentaipattern and developmentalreguiation of features of representative types of embryos are
needed.
As indicated above, the early appearance of large limb
buds and the usual lack of a number of larval features in both
nidicolous and direct developers support a very tenuous assumption that nidicolous-like patterns occurred during the
evolution of direct developers. For the evolution of direct
development, (1)an increase in energy, by some combination of increases in egg size or yoik density, or both, beyond
that which was posuiated as being needed to enter the nidicolous grade of endotrophy from exotrophy wouid be required (see Digression b e l o ~ )and
,
(2) the first profound
changes, something more than developmentaitruncation, in
developmentai timing couid have occurred. The most obvious alteration concerns precociai limb and head formation,
and the early appearance of these structures signals a highiy
185
ENDOTROPHIC ANURANS
modified cascade of developmental events. Whiie remembering that stage designations have no relevante to size or real
time per stage, limb buds appear at Gosner 26 in typical tadpoles -shortly after the tadpole becomes free-swimming.
In direct developers, limb buds appear immediately after
neurulation. Comparisons of timing among developmental
modes may be frivolous other than as an indication of degree, but limbs begin to develop perhaps 10%-20% (much
more for head development) and 9-10 Gosner stages earlier
in relative developmental time than in typical exotrophs.
Large, heavily vascularized tail fins presumably serve as a respiratory surface, but no data are available to support this
idea; embryos of many species, often ones larger than others
with large tails, have s r n d tails. External giiis of direct developers never approach the size or complexity of those of
many exotrophic hatchlings.
Retention of eggs by a direa developing species may result in ovoviviparity and seems like a relatively minor shift
in development, but the similarity of development and morphology between embryos of ovoviviparous forms and the
modified end of the nidicolous guild (not direct-developing
forms) suggests that the evolution of ovoviviparity and direa-development are independent events or that the constraints of ovoviviparitv are different from those for direct
development. Changes in embryonic physiology, especiay
respiration, adjustments in breeding behavior of the adults
to ccomplish.internal fertilization; and alterations in maternal endocrinology to repress ovipositional stimuh would
be involved. Even so, the smail number of ovoviviparous
fiogs signals either strong, negative selective pressures or
constraints. In most circumstances the energetic cost of carrying embryos may be too extreme over too long a period,
especially if being gravid retards preparation for subsequent
broods. The transition from ovoviviparity to nonplacental
viviparity (see M. H . Wake 1978) is perhaps a smder step,
aithough some sort of dometry of the feeding and digestive
structures would have to occur to aow intrauterine feeding.
L
Dgresswn on E
m Size and Composition
The lack of information concerning the relationships betnreen egg composition and size is a strong deterrent to a
thorough understanding of reproductive biologies. Egg size
is commonly invoked as an important modher of anuran
development, and the largest anuran eggs are laid by endotrophs. Numerous studies show that larger eggs provide
greater fitness, even for up to eight years later (Semlitsch
et ai. 1988), but it seems that no one knows what it is about
a big egg that is good. A big egg is assumed to contain more
energy, but (1) variations in yolk density (yolk weightlvolume) and (2) other important components influenced by viteiiogenic physiology (e.g., mRNA, polypeptides translated
by the mother) have not been taken into account. Egg sue
alone is a poor predictor of endotrophy of any kind; there is
a 25% overlap in the range ofendo- and exotrophic eggs
sizes. Exotrophic eggs range from about 0.8 (e.g., Dendrophyniscus) to at least 4.0 mm (e.g., h a p h w tnsei), and endotrophic eggs range from about 1.8 (Sooglosus~ardinen)to
10.0 rnm (Gastrotheca watuph~es,G. weinlandi, and Hemiphractus scutatus). Geocnnia rosea, with an egg diameter of
about 2.4 mm, develops directly in about 6-8 weeks, while
G. victonana has a typical tadpole that develops normdy
from an egg 3.1 mm in diameter (A. A. Martin and Cooper
1972). Based on these observations and the case ofBufoped~enes,we contend that the increase in available energy does
not increase linearly with increases in egg size, and an increase of energy beyond that contained in some average egg
is not the prime prerequisite of endotrophic development.
Even through Salthe and Duellman ( 1973) suggested that
seleaion favors increased ovum size in s r n d frogs and that
only s r n d and medium-size frogs are able to enter fdly terrestrial reproductive zones, there must also be some correlation of egg composition and the likelihood for the evolution
of endotrophy within that sma size group. Even if direa
development and sma adult sue are correlated, one must
consider these two factors on development and eventual
morphology (e.g., Hanken 1983, 1982; Hanken and Wake
1993).
Based on the geometry of a sphere, does a 5-mm egg contain an increase of exady 27% of d components relative
to a 4.5-mm egg? Doubling egg diameter equals an 8-fold
volume increase, whereas doubling the diameter of a large
egg is a much larger absolute amount but a smaer percentage increase than for a sma egg. N o one seems to know
how the composition of energy stores change with egg size
and what patterns might be most advantageous under any
given circumstance. How does metabolic regulation of
yolk consumption differ among developmental modes (e.g.,
A. A. Martin and Cooper 1972)?Answers to these m, e s of
questions likely would demonstrate alterations of maternal
oogenic physiology.
The amount and distribution of volk affects cleavage.
" The
membrane-bound, protein-matrix yolk platelets of various
sizes and shapes distributed throughout the egg persist at
least through neurulation. The transcription of the zygotic
genome and the degradation of the platelets as an energy
source do not start immediately after fertilization. Eggs vary
intra- and inters~ecificavin volk densitv. and there are more
and larger platelets toward the vegetal pole compared with
the animal pole (= moderately telolecithal). This dispersion
produces an increasing yolk gradient from animal to vegetal
bole. and an increase i; iolk aensitv would increase the dope
Lf &e gradient. The poskon of the t h r d cleavage plane (fiist
horizontal plane) above the equator is determined by this
increase in the amo& of
volk "
nradiekt. We assume that
yolk would shft the curve of the yolk gradient toward the
animal pole. We suggest that the latitudinal position of the
third cleavatze
u furrow above the eauator reflects the shaoe of
the yolk gradient, and that t h s cleavage plane probably occurs at a point of similar yolk concentration (at least in eggs
of about the same size). If so, species that have a high yolk
density, whether exotrophic or ndotrophic, compa&dto a
less dense egg would have the t h r d cleavage plane at a
higher latitude. This circumstance would cause the formation of smaer micromeres and larger macromeres than in a
i'
186
<7
and hatchlings (about 1.6 mm SVL) rnay also be able to consume rnites.
We ask if one codd observe normal development afier
the removal of the amount of yoik that normaliy remains
after hatching of a direct developer and replace it with an
inert material to maintain egg conformation? We know of
no data that suggest the kinds of relationships among egg
size (or other egg qualities), yolk remaining at hatching, and
time and growth before first feeding. The absolutely smdest
egg that can produce a froglet directly rnay be dictated by
embryological mechanics and scaling funaions associated
with locomotion, feeding, and dehydration, and the 1.6-mm
egg of S.gardzneri is probably near the lower lunit.
Changes in EmJelly
Although not a direct modifier of endotrophic development,
certain qualities of the egg jeliies had to be modified in association with the various routes out of the aquatic environment. Suggested fnctions for the layers of mucopolysaccarhide jeUy around amphibian eggs include: protection against
predators, bacteria, fungi, dehydration, and thermal shock;
enhancing solar radiation; attachment to a substrate; and restriction of sperm entry to a specific zone and inhbition of
polyspermy. Few correlations among phylogenetic relationships of frogs, their reproductive ecologies (e.g., J. A. Moore
1949b), breeding modes, and egg jeliy configurations have
been suggested. The eggs of phyliomedusine hylids and
Chikalus hatch explosively, and touching one rnay cause
numerou others to hatch in a crackling fry. This explosive
hatching suggests quite a dfierent osmotic regime in these
eggs compared with aquatic eggs, which become increasingly flaccid as development proceeds. Exiting the aquatic
environment wouid produce additional demands on the
functions of egg jeliy (e.g., maintaining turgidity to protect
the embryos from trampling by parents and avoid the loss
of surface area for respiratos. exchange by collapse of the
jeily, retaining spherical egg conformation for proper development in the absence ofwater buoyanq protecting the egg
from desiccation without inhibiting gas exchange, and aiding attachment to the damp surface of the mother's back).
The outer jeliy layer of direct developing eggs ofien is tough
and elastic (eggs bounce when dropped), while the ovum
wiU rupture under its own weight if the jelly is removed in
air. The thick, proximal layer is a stiff gel. Especiaiiy in hemiphractine hylids that carry exposed eggs, the outer jeliy becomes brown and parchmentlike.
Exovivipaq and Paravivipaq
The site of oviposition, the sex and behavior of the attendant
parent, and activities of newly hatched larvae were important
parameters used to delirnit exoviviparous and paraviviparous
g d d s (Aitig and Johnston 1989). While accepting that a discussion of such behavioral modifications of both embryos
and aduits is entirely speculative, we suggest that initial
stages in the evolution of exovivipary and paravivipary were
driven primarily by selection on male behavior. If tactile or
visual stimuli are important in breeding, the male probably
ENDOTROPHIC ANURANS
187
Summary
As noted by E. R. D u m (1924), anuran adults and larvae
live in different worlds so that the significant changes of
rnetamorphosis d o w independent selection on the two life
stages. In a functional context, one can consider two partially
overlapping genornes w i t h each amphibian egg. Largely
different sections of this cornposite genorne rnust be deployed sequentially in order to produce larval features during developrnent and adult features at rnetamorphosis.
Within this single genomic program, the different developmental patterns are produced by dterations in gene expression, and aiterations in either section of the genorne rnust
not adversely affea the other stage (M. J. Rose 1982). The
relative uniformity of rnost endotrophic developmental patterns suggests that the regulatory changes that were ernployed were relatively similar in many cases, but the trajectory of the development of herniphractine hyiids certainly is
grossly different. At a time when the phylogenetic relation-
188
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In alphabetical order, D. Auth, A. Channing, R. C. Drewes,
W. E. Duellman, M. Cherry, M. Hero, D. L. Jameson,
A. J. L. Lambiris, W. Magnusson, H. Marx, R. W. McDiarmid, J. I. Menzies, R. A. Nussbaum, J. D. Roberts, L. Rodriguez, F. Slavens, R. Stocks, P. Tolson, and.J. Vindum contributed or loaned valuable specimens for use in this study
or assisted our efforts in other ways. W. J. Diehi, R. P. Elinson, J. Hanken, and D. S. Townsend contributed substant i d y to earlier drafts. K. Adler and J. R. Mendelson I11
provided citations and other pertinent information, R. Rappaport commented on certain of the ideas presented above,
and J. Hanken kindly supplied several of the photographs
used in this chapter.
PHYSIOLOGY
Coping w i h heEnvironment
Gordon R. Ultsch, David F. Bradford,
and Joseph Freda
Introduction
Early scientific interests in the study of tadpoles centered
mainiy upon developmentai biology and date back to at Ieast
the morphologicai investigations of Jan Swammerdam (e.g.,
1737-1738). Physiologicai studes, aiso inspired by an inquisitiveness about developmentai processes, are generally
dated more recently, usually from the seminal work of Wilhelm Roux (1888), who tested the preformation theory of
development. He destroyed one blastomere of the two-celi
stage of a frog with a hot needle and concluded that the remaining celi could not form a complete embryo. This conclusion was later proven to be incorrect (McClendon 1910);
frogs have radial and indeterminate cleavage, and the effeas
R o a saw were caused by not separating the dead celi from
the live one. Nevertheless, Roux is usually considered the
"father of experimental embryology." In a sense, Roux can
aiso be considered to have been the initiator of studies on
the general physiology of tadpoles (see B. I. Balinsky 1981;
Browder et al. 1991; Carlson 1988; J. A. Moore 1972).
Interests in nondevelopmentai aspeas of the physiology
of tadpoles were insignificant untii the last two to three decades. An increase in the number of papers on tadpole physiology during that period parallels a general proliferation
of studies of the comparative physiology and physiologicai
ecology of lower vertebrates. In this chapter we concentrate
on those aspeas of physiology that are especially relevant to
the ecology of tadpoles, particularly respiration physiology,
thermai relations, and ion and water balance.
Discussions of amphibian energetics by Sede (1987) are
applicable to severai subjeas presented below. Staging notations are from A. C. Taylor and Koiiros (1946) in Roman
numerais and Gosner (1960) parenthetically in Arabic numerais (and see table 2.1).
Respiratory Physiology
It only has been within about the last 20 years that an appreciable amount of research has been done on the respiration
physiology of tadpoles. As with other vertebrates, tadpoles
need to take up oxygen, eliminate carbon &oxide, and maintain an appropriate acid-base status. Beyond this rather generic assertion, further generalizations are risky because of
the diversity of rnicrohabitats in which tadpoles are found
and the variety of gas exchange organs that are present. Furthermore, most studies of gas exchange and acid-base baiance have been done on North Arnerican species, and the
majority of those have been on the bulifrog (&na catesbeiana). Finally, there are apparently physiologicai clines (e.g.,
hemoglobin funaions) occurring in this wide-ranging frog
190
Hemoglobin Functwn
Hemoglobin (Hb) greatly increases the 0, carrying capacity
of blood. Reports of the 0, capacity of bullfrog tadpole
blood range from 7.8 (McCutcheon 1936) to only about 3
v01 % (Pinder and Burggren 1983). McCutcheon (1936)
first reported that the P,, of tadpole (bullfrog) H b was considerably lower than that of an adult, although there is not
enough information to state this as a general case for anurans. A low P,, is presurnably adaptive for an animal that
is primarily a water breather, especialiy if it lives in vegetated
areas that are prone to seasonal and diurnal hypoxia (Nie
et al. 1999; Ultsch 1973, 1976a). McCutcheon (1936) also
reported a negative Bohr shift in tadpole H b contrary to
the positive Bohr effect found in most animals, including
adult bullfrogs. A shdt to the left of the 0, dissociation curve
is adaptive if an animal lives in a hypoxic environment that
is also hypercarbic. This s h h enhances 0, loading from the
hypoxic environment, and hypoxic aquatic environments
are often hypercarbic (Ultsch 1973, 1976a). However, the
presence or absence of a negative Bohr shift in tadpole
H b solutions is dependent upon the buffer solution used
(Aggarwal and Riggs 1969; K. W. K. Watt and Riggs 1975),
and more important, the Bohr shift of whole blood is positive (Johansen and Lenfant 1972; Pinder and Burggren
1983). Thus, the potential ecological adaptive value of a
negative Bohr shift is apparently not realized in whole animal~.
McCutcheon's (1936) finding of an ontogenetic increase
in P,, has been corroborated for H b solutions (reviews by
Broyles 1981; Riggs 1951; SulLivan 1974) and for whole
blood (fig. 8.1; Hazard and Hutchison 1978; Johansen and
Lenfant 1972; Pinder and Burggren 1983). As is the d e in
blood from other species, the P,, of whole tadpole blood is
considerably higher than that of stripped H b solutions because of the presence of cofactors such as nucleoside triphosphates (Aggarwal and Riggs 1969; Sullivan 1974). However, the increase in P,, from tadpole to adult is not related
to organic phosphates, which decrease with metamorphosis
(Hazard and Hutchison 1978; Johansen and Lenfant 1972;
Pinder and Burggren 1983) and is caused by larval H b being
abruptly replaced with adult H b at about Taylor/Kollros
XXII-XXIV (Gosner 4 4 4 5 ; fig. 8.2; Just and Atkinson 1972; Moss and Ingram 1968b; Theil1970). The hemoglobins of both larval and adult buiifiogs are composed of
several components (Just and Atkinson 1972; Moss and Ingram 1968a; Wise 1970). Of the four components (I-IV)
of bullfrog tadpole blood (K. W. K. Watt and Riggs 1975),
components I and I1 predominate in young tadpoles and
have higher 0, affinities than components 111and IV, which
predominate in older tadpoles. Because the lungs of young
bullfrog tadpoles are less developed than those of older ones
Y
O
20
RED CELL
30ORGANIC
PHOSPHATES 10
(PMIs Hb)
1O0
40
60
80
OXYGEN TENSION (mrn Hg)
TAD
INT
ADULT
Fig. 8.1. Oxygen dissociation curves and erythrocyte organic phosphate concentrations of tadpoles (TAD),intermediate stages (INT),
and adults of Rana catesbeiana; n = calculated Hill coefficient. After
Johansen and Lenfant (1972).
191
PHYSIOLOGY
Oxygen Uptake
Gatten et ai. (1992) reviewed the literature on metabolic
rates of amphibian larvae (see aiso Lovtrup and Werdinius
1957) and concluded that only at 20C was there enough
data to permit generalizations. They found that the routine
metabolic rate was essentialiy the same for anuran and saiamander larvae and that the pooled estimate of the metabolic
rate of amphibian larvae was about 50% higher than that of
:t+
d ~ +
Adult type
m/------@
66
------+--------Q
XV
Q
I
P
I
XX
'
I
1 WK
7WK
ADULT
DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE
Fig. 8.2. Relative proportions of larval- and adult-type hemoglobins as a function of developmental stage
(Taylor/Koilros) of Rana catcsbeiana. After Just and Atkinson (1972).
192
arnple, have relatively h g h metaboiic rates even when con- D, fig. 8.3) without any change in 0, conduaance. If the
sidering their small size (Feder 1982; Noland and Ultsch animal can reduce its SMR by halfand double its 0, conduc1981), which could be considered adaptive if a high meta- tance simultaneously, then it can lower its Pcby a factor of 4
bolic rate results in a faster developmental rate that would (25 mm Hg, p o h t C, fig. 8.3). Assurning that these are the
mximal possiblc adjustments in SMR and 0, conductance,
d o w them to escape from a drying pond.
Gattcn et ai. (1992) concluded that the average Q,, for the range of potential adjustments in P, resulting from ail
anuraii larvae was 2.14 over the temperature range of 15"- combinations of changes in SMR and 0, conductance is de25C but did not generalize about Q, values over lower fined by area ABCD.
Decreases in SMR (metabolic depression) of ectotherms
temperature ranges. It would be advantageous for the Q,
to increase corisiderably as temperature falls, particularly at can be induced by a nurnber of factors, including diving (in
temperatures associated with overwintering (i.e., a "meta- air-breathing animais), lowering temperature, torpor and hibolic depression" to considcrably below that expeaed from bernation, and hypoxia or anoxia (reviews by Hochachka
the usual value for Q,, of 2-3 observed at higher tempera- 1988 and Ultsch 1989). Mechanisms normaiiy involve biotures; see Ultsch 1989). A high Q,, would indicate a meta- chemical regulation of rate-limiting enzymes (review by Hoboiic depression that would be adaptive to both a reduced chachka and Somero 1984). Increases in the whole-body 0,
food supply (if ovenvintering tadpoles feed) and the poten- conduaance can be attributed to any mechanisms that
tiaily severe hypoxia that can occur in northern ponds during can favorably alter the rate-iimiting step in the transport of
the winter. There is some indication that metabolic depres- 0, from the extemai environment to the cell. Potential
sion occurs in tadpoles at low temperature (as indicated by O,-exchange limiting mechanisms have been grouped into
a h g h Q,,; Bradford 1983 and G. E. Parker 1967), but the those involving the movement of 0, across the surface of
case for a metabolic depression associated with low tempera- the external gas exchanger (diffision lirnitations), delivery of
ture, hypoxia, or both, is not compeiling. There is a meta- blood to the external gas exchanger (perfusion limitations),
bolic depression during starvation in tadpoles (Bradford and or circulatory limitations between the external gas exchanger
Seymour 1985), and adult anurans and other arnphibiaris and the ceiis (convective limitations; reviews by Feder and
reduce their metabolic rates 70%-82% whiie estivating Burggren 1985; Piiper 1982; Piiper and Scheid 1977).
As mentioned above, some evidence indicates that meta(Seymour 1973; Van Beurden 1980; Whitford and Meltzer
1976; review by Pinder et ai. 1992). Therefore it is likely bolic depression may occur in tadpoles in response.to low
that there is an increase in Q, in tadpoles at low tempera- temperatures during ovenvintering. Most tadpoles that
overwinter are ranids, which during warmer seasons can use
tures (also see Thermal Relations).
Among vertebrates that are exclusively water breathers their lungs to supplement aquaticO, uptake from hypoxic
(e.g., fishes, aithough the following discussion is also rele- water. However, ice covcr during the winter would force the
vant for air-breathing vertebrates), it is typical for VO, to be tadpoles to rely exclusively upon dissolved O,, and a metairidependent of water PO, over some ecologicaiiy relevant bolic depression would be highly adaptive. Whether a metarange from the PO, of air-saturated water downward. Such bolic depression in response to diving occurs in tadpoles is
animais are caiied metabolic 0, regulators, as contrasted open to question and may deperid on the importante of air
with metabolic 0, conformers whose VO, declines steaddy breathing to a given species. Feder (198 1)found that Xemwith declining ambient PO,. The range of naturaiiy oc- pus laevis tadpoles reduced VO, by 20%-40% during forced
curring PO, over which metabolic 0, regulation can occur submergence at 25C relative to conuols with access to air,
is one measure of the degree of adaptation to hypoxia. The while there was no eEect of forced submererrice
on thc VO.
V
PO, at which regulatiori is no longer possible, and VO, of Rana berlander larvae. l n later studies on tlle samc two
starts to decrease with further lowering of ambient PO,, is species, there was no decrease in the VO, during forced subtermed the criticai 0, tension (PJ. The lower the Pc of an mergence of either species relative to those with access to air
animal, the better adapted it is to hypoxic water. At ambient (Feder 1983a; Feder and Wassersug 1984). Thus thc more
0, tensions below the P,, the relationship between VO, and usual finding is no change in total VO, with submergence at
PO, is usudy dose to linear. The slope of this linear rela- near-normoxic PO,. Considering the relatively smaii contritionshp between vO, and PO, below P, has bcen termed bution of puimonary respiration to total VO, in normoxic
the 0, transport capacity of the animal (Beckrnbach 1975) water (Burggren and West 1982; Feder 1983a; Feder and
or the whole-body 0, conductance (J. T. Duke aiid Ultsch Wassersug 1984), this is not a surprising result. However, in
1990); the latter was named in anaiogy to the thermai con- hypoxic water (less than about 70 mm Hg), the aquatic VO,
duaance of endotherms.
of Rana berlandim' and Xenopw uevis tadpoles is much reChanges in metabolic rate and whole-body 0, conduc- duccd in forcibly submerged animais, and access to air does
tance can effect changes in P, (fig. 8.3). Consider an animal not raise the total VOZto control (normoxic water with acthat is a metaboiic 0, regulator with a given standard meta- cess to air) levels (Feder 1983a; Feder and Wassersug 1984).
bolic rate (SMR) and a P, of 100 mm H g (point A, fig. 8.3). Thesc findings suggest that the set point for aquatic VO,
If the animal can double its 0, conductance, P, wiil reduce is lowercd. The possibility that such a controlled response
by halfto 50 mm H g (point B, fig. 8.3) without any change occurred is supported by the observation that ifRana berlanin thc SMR. Alternatively, if the animal can reduce its SMR dieri tadpoles were exercised in water with a PO, of 44-70
by one-half, P, wdl stiii reduce by half to 50 mm H g (point rnrn Hg, the total VO, averaged 80% of control values and
PHYSIOLOGY
P 0 2 at AIR-SATURATION
-+
SMR
(3
SMR
tative. One qualitative conclusion that seems fairly well supported is that the Pcof tadpoles is higher than that of fishes
(Ott et ai. 1980; Ultsch et ai. 1980b, 1981a) and lower than
that of most aquatic saiamanders (J. T. Duke and Ultsch
1990; Ultsch 1976b; Ultsch and Duke 1990), indicating
that the efficacy of tadpole mechanisms for breathmg water
are intermediate between the two. There is a trend toward
a lowering of P, with fding temperame, which could be
expected because of the decreased SMR (fig. 8.3), but data
are sparse. The Pc would be expected to increase with body
size as the surface-to-volumeratio f d s in tadpoles ifthe skin
is an important gas exchange site (see below). This was
found to be the case by Feder (1983b) for resting Bufo woodhousii, but the results are mixed for B. t e w e h and Rana
sphenocephala (Noland and Ultsch 1981). Moreover, Feder
(1983b) found no relationship between body size and Pc in
R. bwlandieri, but Crowder et ai. (1998) found the P, of R.
catesbeiana tadpoles to be relatively constant with body size
through Taylor/Koilros XVI (table 8.1). More data relevant
to this point for species with late lung development would
be especiaiiy interesting.
Gatten et ai. (1992) cded attention to the paucity of
physiologicai data on anuran larvae in their review. They reported that the ability of tadpoles to increase mass-specific
aerobic rates of 0, consumption (i.e., metabolic scope) is
194
G O R D O N R . U L T S C H , D A V I D F. B R A D F O R D , A N D J O S E P H F R E D A
Table 8.1 Estimates of criticai oxygen tension (P,. mm Hg) of various water-breathing tadpoles relative to developmental stage (Taylor/KoUros
1946), body mass (g), and temperature ("C)
Taxon
Stage
Mass
Temperature
pc
Referente
Bufo terrestrtj
Noland and Ultsch 1981
Noland and Ultsch 1981
Noland and Ultsch 1981
Noland and Ultsch 1981
II-VI1
IX-XIV
II-XII
M-xv
Bufo woodhousii
Feder 1983b
Pseuduphyne bibronii
Bradford and Seymour 1988b
Rana berhndien'
Feder 1983a
I-XV
Rana mtesbeiana
Crowder et al. 1998
Crowder et ai. 1998
Crowder et al. 1998
Crowder et ai. 1998
Crowder et ai. 1998
Crowder et ai. 1998
Crowder et al. 1998
Crowder et ai. 1998
Rana muscosa
Bradford 1983
Rana pipiens
Helff and Stubblefield 1931
Rana sphenocqhah
Noland and Ultsch 1981
Noland and Ultsch 1981
Noland and Ultsch 19.81
Noland and Ultsch 1981
I-v
M-m
I-v
M-xrv
xe"PU.cl&
Feder and Wassersug 1984
I-XX
a D qmass.
bEstimatedfrom increases in lactate concentration and visual inspecon of graphs.
<Estimatedfrom increases in iactate concentration after 6 hours submergence.
PHYSIOLOGY
195
TIME ( h )
Fig. 8.4. Respiratory responses of tadpoles of Rana catesbeiana. (Uppw)Respiratory exchange ratio (R =
V C O ~ ~ Oat, )rest and after exhaustive exercise at 23C; the hatched area indicates a sustained decrease in R.
&mm) Means + S. E. of 0, consumption (sqrutres)and CO, elimination (Crtan~les)
under the same conditions;
solid symbols indicate valurs that increase significantlyfrom resting levels. After Quinn and Burggren (1983).
196
However, the ecological importance of the ability to accumulate lactate is most likely related to hypoxia tolerance.
From this viewpoint it is interesting that Feder (1983b)
found that Bufii woodhousii tadpoles swimming to exhaustion
accunlulated no more lactate than those at rest in water with
a PO, of 19 rnm Hg. The effects of prolonged elevations of
lactate dur'ig chronic hypoxia have not been studied.
Gas Exchan~ePartitioning
Tadpoles, like many aquatic salamanders, may have several
sites of gas exchange (e.g., gills, skin, and lungs) and therefore may exchange gses with air, water, or both. The extent
to whlch gas exchange is partitioned among sites and between media depends on a host of factors, including the
presence or absence of lungs, body size, respiratory gas concentrations in the water (at the moment and over time), temperature, stage of development, level of metabolism, and microhabitat (e.g., Jia and Burggren 1997a, b). To understand
the complexities of gas exchange in tadpoles, one must consider the morphological characteristics of the gas exchangers
and their vascular supply. A number of species, such as all
bufonids studied to date and some torrent-dwelling species
(Feder 1981; Nodzenski et al. 1989; Wassersug and Heyer
1983), have rudimentary lungs or do not develop lungs until
metamorphosis. These species are likely more dependent on
cutaneous gas exchange than those with lungs. Microhyiids
(R. M. Savage 1952; Wassersug and Pyburn 19871, some
leptodactylids (Wscrsug and Heycr 1988), and some pipids (Malvin 2988) have a reduced development of the respiratory portions of the gills, which Ikely lowers the ability of
the gills to exchange gases with water. Ranids have all three
sites fu~tctionalfrom an carly age (R. M. Savage 1952). Because bullfrogs and other ranids are most commonly smdied, the discussions herein are heavily weighted toward that
group.
Probably the only universally important gas exchange organ among tadpoles is the integument. Both terrestrial and
aquatic tadpoles possess d ~ typical
e
gas-permeable skin of
amphibians, and all amphibians exchange gases, especially
carbon dioxide, through it. The degree of gas exchange cannot be predicted directly from morphology. For example, the
importance of the skin of tadpoles as a gas exchanger for
oxygen has been questioned by De Saint-Aubain (1982,
1985) and McIndoe and Snlitll (1984b); they noted that
cutaneous vascularization is sparse relative to that of aquatic
salamanders and adult anurans. However, tlle skin can be an
important site of 0, uptake (see below). There also may be
no coupling between the degree of skin vascularization and
the presence or absence of lungs. De Saint-Aubain (1982)
found no morphologtcal Merences in the cutaneous vascular system between the tadpoles of Bufo b u . and Ram tempmaria, although the latter has well-developedlungs and the
former has only rudimentary lungs (R. M. Savage 1952) and
presumably is dependent upon aquatic respiration. Perhaps
the small size of Bufo larvae negates any need for an increased
cutaneous 0, conductance.
In considering the potential of the skin as a gas exchanger,
Fick's law of diffirsion is appropriate: M = D(S)(dP)/I,
where M is the rate of gas transfer, D the diffusion coefficient, S the effective surface area for gas exchange, dP the
partial pressure gradient across the skin, and 1 the distance
over which diffusion must occur (water [or air]-to-blood
barrier). It has been a p e d that gas exchange across the
integument of amphibians is primarily diffusion-limited
(Clemens and Feder 1990; review by Feder and Uurggren
1985) and that &f can be regulated only by varying dP (e.g.,
changing the internal gas pressures or moving to a more favorable respiratory microenvirocment). However, Burggren
and his coworkers argued that at a given dl: M can be regulated by changing the effective values of either S or I. They
proposed that the effective cutaneous exchange area can be
varied by capillary recruitment and derecruitment (Burggren
and Moalli 1984; Feder and Burggren 1985; also Feder
et al. 1988) and that the apparent thickness of the diffusion
path can be decreased by convection that reduces the thickness of the boundary layer (Burggren and Feder 1986; Feder
and Pinder 1988); this layer is potentially important in limiting cutaneous gas exchange (Booth 1990; Pinder and
Feder 1990).
Whether such cutaneous regulatory changes occur, and
whether they are effective in altering cutaneous
is an
open question. For example, the cutaneous VO, of the skin
of aduit Rampdpiens in water with access to air fell as water
PO, fell (Vitalis 1990), which implies that mechanisms avaiiable for increasing cutaneous ~ 0during
,
progressive hypoxia were not effective. Because the frogs could breathe air,
it could be argued that the shortfall in cutaneous VO, was
sirnply made up by an increase in pulmonary 0, uptake,
whlch negated any need for cutaneous regulatory mechanisms to be brought into play. Ln contrast, the much larger
and predominantly skin-breathing salamander Cqptobran&us allganknss can maintain its cutaneous VO, over the
same range of water PO, (Ultsch and Duke 1990) that the
frogs in the study by Vitalis could not (or did not). Therefore, among the amphibians in which the question of the
regulation of cutaneous
in water has been addressed,
there is no definitive answer; data on tadpoles are lacking.
Apparently changes in the rate of gas transfer, particularly
0, uptake, can occur among aquatic amphibians over both
short (Feder et al. 1988; Malvin and Hlastala 1986a, b,
1988) and long terms (J. T. Duke and Ultsch 1990), but
mechanisms and their control remain conjectural (Malvin
and Riedel1990; Pinder et al. 1990). The only study involving tadpoles (Burggren and Mwalukoma 1983) showed that
chronic exposure of bullfrog tadpoles to hypoxia resulted in
a thitlning of the skin, a d o u b h g of capillary mesh density,
and a reduction of the blood-water barrier by one-hall.
Anurans develop external gills prior to hatching and retain them for several days after hatching. The external gills
arc replaced by the internal g a s coincident with the development of the operculum; the internal gills are lost by Taylor/
Kollros XXIII (Gosner 45; Malvin 1988). In bullfrogs between Taylor/Ko1lros V and XX (Gosner 30-42), the gills
are highly vascularized and remain a constant proportion of
body mass; by Taylor/Kollros XXII (Gosner 44) the importance of the gills is diminished as resorption starts and the
m,
m,
197
PHYSIOLOGY
sill capdiaries move deeper into the epithelium (Atlunson in hypoxic water, and the rnicrohabitat of ranid tadpoles can
&i
Just 1975).
It is adaptive for aquatic amphibians to have variable perh i o n patterns that are related to environmental 0, tensbm. Tadpoles in weli-oxygenated water exhibit cardiorespiraton synchrony when at rest (Wassersug et al. 1 9 8 1 ~ )In
.
merely hypoxic water, when the lungs are the primary organ of 0, uptake, 0, would be lost to the water if gdi perfu&n nTasinevitable. Most, if not a, gilled aquatic saiamanbers have shunts that either direa blood from the ventral to
the dorsai portions of the aortic arch before it enters the gili
kmeliae or bypass the respiratory portion of the larneliae by
h n i n g directly from the afferent to efferent branchiai arteries (C. L. Baker 1949; Darneli 1949; Figge 1936; Malvin
1988; Malvin and Boutilier 1985). While the physiologicai data are not as extensive as for saiarnanders, some tadpoles possess giil shunts (De Saint-Aubain 1981, Bufo bufo
md Rana temporaria; McIndoe and Srnith 1984b, Litmia
mhdi), and tadpoles likely exert control over the degree of
shunting (De Saint-Aubain 1985). As with saiamanders
Figge 1936; Malvin 1985a, b), the proportioning of blood
h n - between the respiratory portions of the gills and the
stiunts is presumed to be controlled by selective vasoconariccion, vasodilation, or both, perhaps under the influence
ot'circulating catecholamines.
,hwith external giils among other amphibians (Bond
1960), the degree of development of anuran internal giils is
responsive to the concentrations of dissolved respiratory
( b v t r u p and Pign 1968). Bulifrog tadpoles in Taybr;'Koiiros XV-XX (Gosner 40-42) exposed to a water PO,
ot'7C80 mrn H g for 4 weeks increased the size and nurnber
of'gili iiaments; chronic hyperoxia (387-430 mm Hg) had
w d e a (Burggren and Mwaiukoma 1983). Although tadpoles in hypoxic water in that study had access to a gaseous
phase, the gas had the same PO, as the water, so it is uncerQin how great the morphologicai response of the giils would
have been had the tadpoles had access to normal air, espea d y because they were at a stage where the lungs are weli
k e l o p e d . Nevertheless, the presence of a morphological
response capability was evident.
The lungs of bulifrog larvae gain weight frorn Taylor/
Koilros V-XV (Gosner 30-40); afier that, lung absolute
neight remains relatively unchanged, but their relative
a-eight increases as body weight falis (Atkinson and Just
1975). These authors reported the degree of lung septation
ro be minor at Taylor/Koliros X (35) and increasing considm b l y by stage XXII (44) as tail resorption progresses. This
does not mean that the lungs are not functionai in early
stages, because even early-stage bulifrog tadpoles surface
occasionally to breathe and routinely have gas-filled lungs
(Crowder et al. 1998; Just et ai. 1973; also Orlando and
Pinder 1995).
The ability to breathe air is not cruciai to developrnent
or survival in bulifrog larvae through Taylor/Koliros XXI
rGosner 43) when submerged in normoxic water at 20C,
but later stages wiil drown (Crowder et al. 1998; Just et al.
1973). It appears that ali stages breathe air (Crowder et al.
1998; Just et al. 1973). The utility of breathuig air is obvious
198
m,,
m,
+--+
Lungs
".i_::-----.
.>
40
20
...I.____
.-.......
-E
Gills
$-/
Skin
Skin
.>"
40
w..
..
....,...
+/+
Lungs
-.A~ills
(IV-V)
(XVI-XIX)
(XXill-XXIV)
ADULT
DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE
Fig. 8.5. The relative contributions of giiis, skin, and lungs to gas exchange in tadpoles and adults of Rana catesbeiana at 20C. (Ufler) O,
uptake (vo,). (Lower) CO, elimination (vco,). Tadpoles and metamorphosing individual staged according to Taylor and Kohos (1946). Dotted lines connect to presumed values. After Burggren and West (1982).
199
PHYSIOLOGY
1 ,
(a*,)
GORDON R. U L T S C H , D A V I D F. B R A D F O R D , A N D J O S E P H F R E D A
50% SATURATION
C*
. ..
Om.
RANA SPHENOCEPHALA
1990; Sexton and Phillips 1986; D.C. Smith 1983; see Barreto and Moriera 1996). Some anurans that breed in temporary ponds have relatively unpalatable larvae (e.g., R. A.
Griffiths 1986; Reading 1990; Voris and Bacon 1966; Wassersug 1971; Wilbur 1987; some Bafa), which would allow
them to be exposed in shallow, well-oxygenated waters, but
in general temporary-pond breeders have tadpoles that are
more palatable than those of permanent-pond breeders (see
chap. 9). Among anurans that breed in permanent ponds,
tadpoles of those with extended developmental periods may
also be less palatable than those with shorter developmental
periods. Bullfrog tadpoles, wMe apparently not absolutely
unpalatable, will be avoided by some predators if there are
other anuran larvae available ( h s e and Francis 1977;
Woodward 1983).
The relationshius between behavior and air breathing
have not been exteisively studied. The decreasing frequenG
of air breathing with increasing water PO, (Crowder et al.
1998, Wassersug and Seibert 1975; reviews by Feder 1984,
Burggren 1984) intjlcates that pulmonary respiration is an
accessory means of gas exchange in tadpoles. Using lungs
only when necessary shodd lower the predation risk associated with breathing at the surface (Feder 1983~).In addtion, when a tadp& does surface t* breathe air, ;he breath
is taken quickly and followed by a rapid descent to minimize
PHYSIOLOGY
201
202
Thermal Physiology
Of all the physicai parameters in the aquatic environment,
temperature is perhaps the most dramatic in its effea on the
physiology, ecology, and behavior of anuran larvae. For example, environmental temperature dramatically affeas the
time taken to reach metamorphosis, which can be criticai t o
the survivai of an individual faced with a drying habitat or
the onset of winter. Temperature aiso affeas differentiation
and growth rates, body size at metamorphosis, mechanisms
of gas exchange, rates of energy metabolism, and undoubtedly many other physiologicai parameters documented in
other eaothermic vertebrates. Moreover, the limits of temperature tolerance and temperature-dependent life history
traits of anuran l m a e are generally related to the geographic
distribution of the species.
The thermai environment of all anuran larvae is variable
in space and time, often extremely so in shallow water exposed t o intense insolation. For example, tadpoles of Rana
catesbeiana may encounter seasonai temperatures ranging
from near 0" t o over 3SC, and near-shore temperatures may
increase by more ti~an20C in less than 6 hr (Ldlywhite
1970; Menke and Claussen 1982). Water temperature adjacent t o tadpoles of some species in temporary ponds may
regularly rise during the day to 42C (H. A. Brown 1969;
Dunson 1977). Anuran larvae have generally accornmodated
to variation in the thermai environment by (1) possessing
the physiologicai ability to function over a wide range in
body temperature, (2) behaviorally regulating body temperature, and (3) physiologically adjusting to changes in environmentai temperature (i.e., acclimatization, or in the laboratory, acclimation). O n an evolutionary scale, variation in
the thermai environment has resulted in natural selection for
differences among anuran larvae in a number of temperature-dependent physiological or life history traits.
Temperature Tolerante Lzmits
The lirnits of temperature tolerance of an animal are commonly described by a criticai thermai maximum (R,)
and
criticai thermal rninimum (CT-). These usually are defined
as the temperatures at which "locomotor activity becomes
disorganized and the animal loses its ability to escape from
conditions that wili promptly lead to its death" (Cowles and
Bogert 1944). The CT,, for most anuran larvae, when compared at the same stage of development and at intermediate
acclimation temperatures, is between about 38" and 42C
(table 8.2). Extreme vaiues are severai degrees higher
(44.9"C, Bufo marinus; fig. 8.7; table 8.2), and CT,, is apparently often approached in nature. For example, Cyclorana
cultrpes, C. piutyuphaiu, and Litoria mbella occur in Australian pools at 39.2"C (Main 1968), Lzmnonectes canwivovus
at 42C (Dunson 1977), Scaphwpw couchii at 39"40C
(Mayhew 1965), Pseudaois tmimata at 36.SC (Hoppe
1978), Osteopzlus septentrionalis suspeaed at 42C (H. A.
Acclimation temperature
O 35C
A 30C
O 25C
DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE
Fig. 8.7. Critical thermal m b a (a),
and critical thermal minima
(arn) of larvae of Bufi marinus at three acclimation temperatures and
variou stages of development. Dotted liries connect mean responses
of larvae averaged over aii acciimation temperatures. Staging foiiows
Gosner (1960). After Floyd (1983).
PHYSIOLOGY
203
Table 8.2 Preferred body temperatures (PBT, as mean selected temperature) and CT,, and CT,,for anuran l m a e at various stages and acclimation temperatures. In studies including more than one acclimation temperature or larval stage, an intermediate acclunation temperature and
,,
o b s e ~ e dat any larval stage
stage closest to Gosner (1960) stage 39 were chosen. Values UI parentheses are the extreme means of CT,,or a
or acclimation temperature. FTP = final thermai preferendum, (i.e., acclimation temperature equals PBT; Reynolds and Casterlin 1979) and
RT = room temperature.
Species
Stage
Acclimation
Temperature
("c)
ASCAPHIDAE
Ascaphus tnrei
BUFONIDAE
Bufi amwicanus
B. boreas
PBT
a,,
10
FTP
22.5
20
22.5
22.5
27
30
21
25
27
-
20
HYLIDAE
Osteupilus
septentrionalis
Pseudaclzr regilia
f?hiseriata
20
H . A. Brown 1969
H. A. Brown 1969
Dupr and Petranka 1985
Hoppe 1978
Cupp 1980
21
20
Cupp 1980
25
20
ETP
-
LEPTODACTYLIDAE
Lepto*lus
albilabvk
MICROHYLIDAE
Gartruphvyne
carolinensis
PELOBATIDAE
Scaphiopus couchii
S. holbmokii
Spea hammondii
RANIDAE
Limnanectes
ca~tcrivwus
R. cmcadae
R. cutesbeiana
25
18-20
26.5
H. A. Brown 1969
Gosner and Black 1955
H. A. Brown 1969
22-25
21
21
24
26.7
RT
15
20
20
4
20
FTP
RT
27
FTP
20
20
22
Dunson 1977
W o h u t h et al. 1987
W o h u t h and Crawshaw 1988
Dupr et ai. 1986
Hutchison and Hi 1978
Lucas and Reynolds 1967
Menke and Claussen 1982
Workman and Fisher 1941
Wiilhite and Cupp 1982
D. F. Bradford, unpublished data
W o r h a n and Fisher 1941
Casterlin and Reynolds 1979
Lucas and Reynolds 1967
Noland and Ultsch 1981
Dupr and Petranka 1985
W o r h a n and Fisher 1941
Cupp 1980
Manis and Claussen 1986
204
(Manis and Claussen 1986). In contrast, no sigiiificant difference in CT,= was found benveen populations ofleptodmtylus albilabris at 15 and 570 m elevation in Puerto Rico
(Heanvole et ai. 1968).
The CT,,also appears to correlate with environmentai
temperatures, although it has been determined for tadpoles
of only a few species (table 8.2). In Rana muscosa, a species
in which tadpoles ovenvinter in frozen lakes, CT,,is below
-2C. The CT
,,
is near or below 0C in R. catesbeiana, a
temperate species that ovenvinters in some populations
(Coiiins 1979), a n d h a p h w truei, a species inhabiting coo1
temperate streams. In contrast, the tropical Bufo marinus has
a much higher Ct,, (i.e., 6.0C or greater and dependent
on acclimation temperature and larvai stage; fig. 8.7). Similarly, in the temperate species Scaphiopus holbrookii, which
undergoes larvai development entirely during the surnmer,
CT, is 8.5"C in larvae acciimated at 18"-20C.
The temperature tolerance range of anuran larvae is large
in comparison to most eaothermic vertebrates. In species
in which both CT,, and CT,,have been determined, the
temperature tolerance range for a single stage of development and acclimation regime is 34C in Bufo marinus, 37C
in R. catesbeiana, and 28C in Scaphwpus holbrookii (table
8.2). This range is even greater if acchation effects are included. For example, B. marinus tadpoles at Taylor/Kollros
VI (Gosner 31) can tolerate a temperature range of 39C if
acchated prior to exposures to the low and high temperatures (fig. 8.7; Floyd 1983; ais0 Abe and Godinho 1991).
Data are not available for the temperature tolerance limits
of tropical forest species that experiente relatively s m d variations in temperature. It might be expected that tadpoles of
these species would have narrower temperature tolerance
ranges than species exposed to wider temperature variation.
However, among adult anurans, tropical species do not gene r d y have narrower temperature tolerance ranges in comparison to temperate forms, aithough their temperature tolerance iimits are higher than those for temperate species
(Brattstrom 1968).
The typicaiiy higher CT,, of tadpoles relative to adults is
a striking difference in the thermai relations of larvai and
adult anurans. This is the case for Bufo americanus, B. exsul,
B. marinus, B. woodhousii, Gastrophlyne carolinensis, Rana
catesbeiana, R. pipiens, R. sylvatica, and Scaphiopus holbrookii
(Cupp 1980; Floyd 1983; Hathaway 1927; Sherman 1980;
Straw 1958; compare data in table 8.2 with Brattstrom
1968). The only apparent exceptions to this pattern are Pseuh r i s tnjeriata, in which larvai m
, appears to be similar
to adult CT,, (Hoppe 1978), and B. canums, in whch larvai
CT
,,
is lower than adult CT
,,
(Karlstrom 1962). The finding that R. pipiens tadpoles die more quickly at high temperature than adults (Orr 1955) may have been caused by
differences in body size. The generdy higher a,,,,
of tadpoles than adults may reflea the need for tadpoles to minimize the time to complete metamorphosis and escape inimicai environmentai conditions and aquatic predators (see
below). Alternatively, this difference may reflect the greater
iikelihood for tadpoles than adults to become trapped in
warm surroundings. Adults on land continudy lose heat
i1
Growih
TEMPERATURE ('C)
Fig. 8.8. Temperature dependence of differentiation rate and growth
rate for individual Ranapipiens. Growth rate is cornputed as the regression coefficient of body v o l ~ r n eon
~ .days
~ ~ up to Taylor/Koiiros XVII
(Gosner 40). Differentiation rate is computed as the regrcssion coefficient of stage on days through Taylor/Kollros XX (Gosner 42). Lines
connect geometric rneans at each temperature. After Smith-Giii and
Berven (1979).
PHYSIOLOGY
205
206
son and Maness 1979; and references therein). In ali amphibian larvae examined (table 8.2), temperature tolerance
limits are significantly affected by the temperature of acciimation. For example, an increase in acciimation temperature
of Bufo marinus from 25" to 35C resiilted in an increase in
CT,= of about 2.5"C and an increase in CT, of about 1C
(fig. 8.7). Among five other species (Bufo,Gastrophryne,Pseuda&, Rana), an increase in acclimation temperature from
10" to 30C resulted in an increase in CTm, of about 1"-3C
(Cupp 1980), and an increase in acclinlation temperature
from 15" to 35C in three species (Osteopilus,Scaphiopus, and
Spea) resiilted in an increase in lethal temperature by about
4C (H. A. Rrown 1969). Such effects are probably essential
for surviving temperature extremes in natural conditions, as
a number of species have been observed in the field thriving
,,
(see above). The
in water at temperatures near their CT
effect of acclimation temperature on PBT is much less distinctive than its effea on temperature tolerance iirnits. InAscaphus truei and B u . marinus, there is no effect of temperature acclimation (De Vlaming and Bury 1970; Floyd 1984),
whereas a complex interaction was found among acclimation
temperature, stage of development, and PBT in Rana cascadae,R. catesbeiana, and R.pipiens (Hutchison and Hdi 1978;
Lucas and Reynolds 1967; Wollmuth et al. 1987). The time
required to acclinlate completely to a new temperature has
not been documented for anuran larvae. In adult anurans
about two to four days are required for CT
,,
and CT,, to
s t a b h e after a large change in acclimation temperature
(Brattstrom 1968; D u e h a n and Tmeb 1986). Possibly as
little as 24-36 hr are required in larvae, and t h s time has
been used as the minimum required for measuring the "final
thermal preferendum" (= the temperature uitimately selected regardless of previous thermal experiente; Casterlin
and Reynolds 1979; Dupr and Petranka 1985; Reynolds
and Casterlin 1979).
In addition to acclinlation, which is a gradual process,
tadpoles of Rana catesbeiana undergo heat and cold "hardening" (Menke and Claussen 1982). In this process tadpoles
exposed briefly to near-lethal temperatures become more
tolerant to subsequent exposure to these temperatures
within 90 rnin.
PHYSIOLOGY
207
1982). Seasonal differences in PBT have been found in R. during the daytime as water temperature increases. Tadpoles
catesbeiana and R. pipiens (Lucas and Reynolds 1967; Woil- commonly select the warmest temperatures available (e.g.,
muth and Crawshaw 1988). In tadpoles of R. catesbeiana at Beiswenger 1977,1978; Bradford 1984b; Brattstrom 1962;
Taylor/Kollros XI-XVI (Gosner 36-40), PBT was above Muilally 1953; Noland and Ultsch 1981; Tevis 1966; Woll30C during surnmer and in the mid-20s during winter. In muth et al. 1987; Bu) boreas, B. canorus, B. hemwphlys, B.
contrast, earlier stage tadpoles selected the same temperature punctatus, B. terresCm,,Rana c a s h , and R. muscosa). Overthroughout the year. Aithough the cues underlying this sea- wintering R. muscosa select the warmest temperature below
sonal diierence in later stage tadpoles of R. catesbeiana are the thermocline in frozen lakes (i.e., 3"4"C; Bradford
unknown, a seasonal dzerence in PBT would unction to 1984b). For some anurans (e.g., Beiswenger 1977, 1978;
minirnize rate of diierentiation at a time inappropriate for Brattstrom 1962; Noland and Ultsch 1981,Bufo a m a n u s ,
rapid development and metamorphosis (Woilmuth and PseudamS crucfer, Rana boylii, and R. sphevwcephala) surface
waters become sufficiently warm that they are avoided or no
Crawshaw 1988).
Although tadpoles of many species are positively or neg- longer sought.
A comparison of the thermal relations of Bufo terremi
atively phototaxic (Dueliman and Tmeb 1986; Wolimuth
et ai. 1987), daytime PBT does not diier significantly from and Rana sphenocephala in the field and laboratory demonnighttime PBT of Rana pipiens (Casterh and Reynolds strates relationships among tadpole temperature tolerance
1979). Many positive phototaxic responses may occur in an- limits, tadpole thermoregulatory behavior, and the therticipation of increasing water temperatures that foilow expo- mal characteristics of the environment (Noland and Ultsch
sure to sunlight (Beiswenger 1977; Dueliman and Trueb 1981). Tadpoles of B. tememi typicdy select the warmest
1986). Photoperiod d e a s the PBT of second-year but not temperatures available in shaiiow water, which often results
PBT increases when in body temperatures above 30C. In contrast, R. pipiens
first-year tadpoles of Ascaphus -i;
photoperiod increases (De Vlaming and Bury 1970). Photo- avoids shaiiow water when temperatures become warm, and
period affects CT,, and CT,,, in B. marinus tadpoles in a body temperatures are typicaiiy weil below 30C. These
way that appears to increase survival under potentially dan- dzerences correlate with a higher CT,, in B. temescris than
gerous thermal conditions (Floyd 1985). At high acclima- in R. pipiens (table 8.2). Aiso, the body temperature of B.
tion temperatures, a long photoperiod increases R,,and temesh-zj in the field more frequently is near the CT,, than
at low acclimation temperature, a short photoperiod reduces R. pzpiens The conspicuous behavior that maximizes body
CTmm.
The magnitude of these effects in B. marinus is a s m d temperature in B. temesh-zj, a species that frequently breeds
fraction of the changes in CT,, and CTm,,caused by ther- in shdow, temporary waters, is viewed as a strategy for
mal history.
shortening developmental time and thus increasing the
Nutritional state affects PBT in many ectothermic verte- probabiiity of completing metamorphosis before the habitat
brates, includiig aduit anurans. The increase in PBT that oc- dries. In contrast, R.pz;piensusudy inhabits more permanent
curs when the animal is digesting food (Ldiywhite et al. habitats than Bufo and does not develop as rapidly. More1973) presumably maximizes rate of digestion and con- over, Rana habitats typically have lower ambient temperaserves energy when digestion is not occurring. This pattern tures than Bu$ habitats.
may be irrelevant for many anuran larvae, which are virtudy
Dense aggregations of a few to thousands of anuran larnever without food in the digestive tract. No data are avail- vae frequently occur (see chap. 9). Aithough a number of
able to assess the effect of nuuitional state on PBT in tad- factors are involved in the formation and maintenance of
poles. Nutritional state affects thermal tolerance limits in these aggregations, water temperature is often the dominant
Bufo americanus and B. marinus by decreasing the range of factor (Beiswenger 1975, 1977,1978). For example, in Bufo
tolerance during food deprivation (Cupp 1980; Floyd ametiuznus,
dispersed tadpoles are activated in the morning
1985). However, the magnitude of the reduction in both by increasing light intensity and move to shdow water on
species is s m d in comparison to the effects of thermal his- sunny days where they accumuiate in warm microhabitats
tory on temperature tolerance h i t s .
(Beiswenger 1975). Once tadpoles reach sufficient density
in the lighter and warmer microhabitats, feeding and social
Themzoreg~tlatwna n d h r e g a t w n Behavwr
activities draw them into dense aggregations. At night as
Aithough selection by tadpoles of a preferred body tempera- water temperatures decrease in the shdows, tadpoles return
ture is evident in the laboratory, a host of factors (e.g., light to warmer, offshore water. Beiswenger (1975) argued that
intensity, food availabiiity and quality, dissolved oxygen, aggregating is a way for tadpoles-to exploit food more
popuiation density, presence of predators, and tadpole social efficiently, engage in certain social activities, and seek suitinteractions) other than temperature may d e c t microhabi- able temperatures more effectively. In contrast, Brattstrom
tat selection in the field (Beiswenger 1975, 1977; Lemckert (1962,1970) and Woilmuth et al. (1987) argued that aggre1996; Noland and Ultsch 1981; Woilmuth et al. 1987). gations in B. boreas, Pseudacris crttcfer,l? regila, &na boylzi,
Nevertheless, temperature is often the dominant factor de- and R. c a s h occurred because of, and to augment, the
termining microhabitat seleaion, and thermoregulatory be- thermal characteristics of the local microhabitat. Clearlv.
havior has been documented in a number of studies.
dense aggregations in many species are often observed in the
Tadpoles in many temperate ponds typicatiy lie offshore warmest niicrohabitats in a pond.
at night in warmer, deeper water and migrate to shdows
Brattstrom (1962) provided experimental evidence that
i'
208
tadpoles aggregate, in part, because they absorb more solar crease from 13" to 23C resuits in about a 10-fold increase
radiation than the surroundmg water, which resuits in more in differentiation rate and a 6-fold increase in growth rate in
heat being absorbed in water containing aggregations. Beis- Ranapipiens (fig. 8.8; Smith-Giii and Berven 1979). Similar
wenger (1977) described observations both supporting and patterns are also found in R. chmitans and R. sylvatica (Berrefuting this argument. The use of white porcelain pans in ven 1982; Berven et ai. 1979).
which much of the radiation rnay have been refleaed by the
Environmentai temperature has a ~ronouncedeffect on
white substrate is a limitation in evaluating the data in Bratt- length of the larvai ieriod by virtu; of its iduence on
strom's (1962) paper. Further experiments are needed in differentiation and growth rates (Smith-Gill and Berven
which the radiative properties of the substrate in the test sys- 1979). In some species, reducing the time to metamorphosis
to a rninimum is critical because tadpoles must complete
tem better represent those in the field.
metamorphosis prior to drying of the habitat or onset of
Temperatwe, Dzflerentiatwn, and Crowth Rate
other inimical conditions. Behavioral temDerature selection
The influence of temperature on differentiation and growth resuiting in maximal differentiation rate wouid be expected
rates probably is the most dramatic effect of environmentai (e.g., Brattstrom 1962; Sherman 1980; Wolimuth et al.
temperature on the ecological physiology of anuran larvae. 1987). The differential effea of temperature on differentiaThis influence determines larval body size and length of the tion and growth rates promotes emergence from ponds durlarval period (Reques and Tejedo 1995; Smith-Giii and Ber- ing the warm part of the year, particularly if ponds become
ven 1979), which in turn are directly related to survivai and overheated during pond drying (Etkin 1964). The same
reproductive success (Berven 1982; Berven and Gdl 1983; mechanism mhibits emergence during the inappropriate
Berven et al. 1979; C o h s 1979; Crump 1989a; Harkey cold season.
In some species and environments, temperature may be
and Semiitsch 1988; D.C. Smith 1987). Typicaiiy, an increase in temperature resuits in faster rates of development sufficiently low to make ovenvinteriig of larvae obiigatory
and growth, shorter time to metamorphosis, and smaiier (Berven et al. 1979; C o h s 1979; Coiiins and Lewis 1979;
Smith-Giii and Berven 1979). Overwintering occurs in a
body size at metamorphosis.
A model that predicts the timing of metamorphosis based number of anurans at high elevation and latitude where averon differentiation rate has been proposed and tested in the age temperatures are lower and the growing season is shorter
laboratory and field by Smith-Gdl and Berven (1979). In than at lower elevation and latitude. For examde. Rana
Ranapipiens, differentiation rate (defined as the slope of the catesbeiana larvae in Louisiana rnay complete metamorphosis
stage-age relationship) is strongly correlated (r2 = 0.95) in a few months, whereas individuals in Michigan may not
with the length of the larval period, whereas growth rate is metamorphose untii their third summer (Coiiins 1979).Asconsiderably less correlated (rZ = 0.51). Growth rates of caphus trei tadpoles in subalpine sites in Washington require
R. pipiens and R. sylvatica larvae in some circumstances show five summers to complete larval development (H. A. Brown
no significant relationship to length of the larval period. 1990b). In R. ylvatica in montane environments, a oneGrowth pararneters are often poor predictors of timing of month difference in ovi~ositionresuits in nearlv, a vear
,
metamorphosis largely because growth and differentiation difference in completion of metamorphosis because larvae
are affected differentiaily by environmental factors such as from eggs oviposited later must overwinter (Berven et ai.
temperature and population density. Also, growth rate is 1979). At extreme elevations and latitudes, low temperafunctionaiiy dependent upon differentiation rate, whereas tures that Drevent metamor~hosismav be the factor h:tine
the converse is not true. This is because growth and develop- the geographic range of a species (Smith-Giil and Berven
mental rates are both functions of circulating hormone lev- 1979; Uhlenhuth 1921).
els, which are in turn dependent upon thestage of differAmphibian larvae are typicaiiy larger when raised at low
entiation reached. Nevertheless, growth rate frequently is temperature, a phenomenon that appears to be general for
related to the duration of larval development (e.g., Wiibur larval ectotherms (Berven 1982; Berven and GU 1983; Berand Coilins 1973) because conditions favorable for differ- ven et al. 1979; C o h s 1979; Etkin 1964; Harkey and Sementiation often are also favorable for growth (Smith-Giil and iitsch 1988; Koiiros 1961; Smith-Gdi and Berven 1979;
Uhlenhuth 1919). For example, R. pipiens raised at 13" and
Berven 1979).
Temperature is a major factor determining larvai differ- 23C in the laboratory differ in body size by about 3-fold at
entiation and growth patterns, although other factors such aii stages, including metamorphic climax (fig. 8.9; Smithas density, food abundance and quality, and water quality Gdi and Berven 1979). In R. sylvatica in the laboratory and
are clearly important (Berven 1982; Berven and Giil 1983; in R. clamitans in both the field and laboratory, a 10C deHarkey and Semiitsch 1988; Pandian and Marian 1985b; crease in temperature results in about a 2-fold increase in
Smith-Giii and Berven 1979; Viparina and Just 1975; Wil- body size at ietamorphic clima (Berven 1982; Berven and
bur 1980; Wdbur and Coilins 1973). As temperature in- Gil1 1983; Berven et al. 1979). Larger size at lower temperacreases, rates of differentiation and growth both increase ture can be attributed to the greater effect of temperature on
until an mhibiting temperature is reached (Berven 1982; Be- differentiation rate than on growth rate (fig. 8.8; Berven
rven et al. 1979; Harkey and Semhtsch 1988; Smith-Giii et ai. 1979; Smith-Giii and Berven 1979). Thus. iarvae at
and Berven 1979). Such an increase is predictable based on low temperatures gain more mass and are larger at any given
Arrhenius enzyrne lunetics. For example, a temperature in- stage, including metamorphic clima, than at higher temI
PHYSIOLOGY
209
210
Osmoregulatory Physiology
Our current knowledge of ion and water balance in tadpoles
has come from three principie areas: comparative physiology, properties of adult and lamal frog skin, and acidiication
of freshwater habitats by acidic deposition. The latter causes
mortality of amphbian lamae (e.g., Ling et ai. 1986) primarily through the disruption of Na+ and C 1 regulation. Studies exploring the mechanisms of acid water toxicity have revealed much basic information about ion regulation in
tadpoles (e.g., Pierce 1985; Pierce and Harvey 1987; Pierce
et ai. 1984). Although osmoregulation in tadpoles has been
studied from these different perspectives, our overaii knowledge stili remains incomplete in comparison with our
knowledge of gas exchange in tadpoles or osmoregulation in
fishes. Thus far, ion regulation in tadpoles appears to be similar to ion regulation in teleost fishes. Significant differences
between tadpoles and teleosts include an active uptake of
ions across the skin, giils that are less developed morphologicdy, and metamorphosis providing a gradual transition to
air breathing. Many interesting detais regarding ion and water balance in tadpoles await discovery. In this section, our
current state of knowledge is presented and promising areas
for research are suggested.
Body Compositwn
The ionic composition of the plasma of tadpoles, like most
freshwater vertebrates, is markedly hyperosmotic and hyperionic relative to the surrounding environment. Ions of Na+,
CI- and HCO; (table 8.3) are the major constituents responsible for 50%, 30%, and 15% of the osmotic pressure
of plasma respectively (Just et al. 1977). The concentration
of Na+ in bullfrog tadpoles is much more dilute than in typical teleost fishes (90 and 150 mEq/liter, respectively). In the
crab-eating frog (Lzmnonectes ~ a n ~ v m sNa+
) , and C 1 are
also the most important ionic constituents, but their concentrations are about 50% higher than in bullfrogs acciimated
to similar conditions (table 8.3; M. S. Gordon and Tucker
1965). Limnonectescancrivorus inhabits braclush water ponds
and both tadpoles and adults can survive prolonged exposure to fil-strength seawater. The plasma osmolarity of
Table 8.3 Ionic cornposition, osmotic pressure and hernatocrit of the pla srna of tadpoles
Ionic cornposition (mEq/liter)
Species
Limnonectes
~anrrivorus~
Rana catesbeiana
Na'
K+
CI-
HCO,
Osmotic
Pressure
(rnOsm/liter)
153
90
96-109
5
4
3 4
99
68
57-60
25
8-24
272
70-195
1-200
Hernatocrit
(%)
Referente
M. S. Gordon and Tucker
1965
Alvarado and Moody 1970
Just et ai. 1977
S. C. Brown et ai. 1986
Funkhouser 1977
Funkhouser 1977
PHYSIOLOGY
Table 8.4 Ion content and percent body water of five species of Rana tidpoles
lon Content
(p,Mol/g dry body mass)
Species of Rana
catesbeiana
clamitans
muscosa
pip'ens
sylvatica
'units
Na'
573-1080
573
369
60-70'
-
1365-1815
400-800
Body
water
K+
Cat+
339-355
45-5 5'
30-35"
507
300-600
C1-
Referente
3040'
-
88-91
300-825
87-96
(%)
212
Ion Rt~uiution
Tadpoles continuously lose Na+, CI- and other ions because
of the large concentration gradient between their body fluids
and the water. In addition, ions are lost in the urine. We are
not aware of studies that quanti@ the relative importance of
these different loss routes. Several studies reported loss rates
of Na+ and CI- for Rana catesbeiana and R. clamitans (Aivarado and Moody 1970; Dietz and Aivarado 1974; Freda and
Dunson 1984; McDonald et ai. 1984). Uptake of Na+ and
CI- generaiiy exceeds loss so the animais remain in positive
ion baiance. Possible routes of active uptake of ions include
the gilis, skin, gut, and buccopharyngeal epithelium. Initially
uptake was thought to occur only at the gilis because Na+
and CI- was lost from solutions used to perfuse the gilis,
but uptake was not increased if the persate was aiiowed to
contact the skin (Aivarado and Moody 1970). In addition,
studies of isolated larval skin did not detect active uptake
or a transepithelial potential (TEP; Aivarado and Moody
1970). In support of the notion of the lack of dermai transport, active transport and TEP across the skin abruptiy appear late in metamorphosis and are correlated with an increase in skm Na+-K+-ATPase(Boonkoom and Aivarado
1971; Kawada et ai. 1969; R. E. Taylor and Barker 1965).
This conclusion has been challenged because stripping the
skins from the underlying musculature caused considerable
stress to the preparation. In addition, no specific precautions
were taken to prevent edge damage. Cox and Aivarado
(1979; see Aivarado and Cox 1985) developed techniques
for the study of isolated larval skin that rninimized dissection
and edge damage. They found that larval skin actively transports Na+ inward at a rate of 5%10% of that of adult skm.
Their work suggests that the basal membrane in the skm of
larval and adult anurans is similar. The difference in the rate
of Na+ transport may be caused by the absence of amilorideinhibitable Na+ channels in the apical membrane of larvai
skin. The addition of nystatin (forms cation-selective channels in lipid bilayers) to the outer bathing solution stimulated Na+ influx to rates comparable to untreated adult
skms (Cox and Aivarado 1983; also Zamorano and Salibin 1994).
The many factors that influente the active uptake of Na'
include temperature, external ion concentration, water hardness, and pH. Interspecific differences may occur, but conclusive data are lacking. The uptake mechanisms for Na+ and
CI- display typical saturation kinetics. The Km and V, for
Na+ uptake in Rana catesbeiana tadpoles were 0.2 mEq/liter
and 0.25 ~ E q / g - h(Dietz and Aivarado 1974). Freda and
Dunson (1986) reported a Km and V, for Na+ transport
in R. catesbeiana to be 0.28 mEq/liter and 13.4 ~Eq1g.hon
a dry mass basis (= 1.61 p,Eq/g.h; assuming 90% body water). The chloride transporter was saturated over the range
of 0.2-3.0 mEq/liter and the V, for C1- was 0.10-0.15
~Eq1g.h(Dietz and Aivarado 1974). The location and type
of ceils responsible for Na+ and C1- transport have not been
identiied. Na+-K+-ATPaseactivity in microsomal fractions
of giil homogenate correlates weil with the intensity of Na+
transport (Boonkoom and Aivarado 1971). Na+-K+-ATPase
has also been measured in the skin of Rana catesbeiana tadpoles (Kawada et al. 1969).
The transport of Na+ and CI- are independent. For example, acetazolamide inhbits the branchial influx of CIwithout affecting the influx of Na+ or the efflux of Na+ or
CI- (Dietz and Aivarado 1974). The counter ions for Na+
transport are thought to be H + and NH,', while CI- is exchanged for HC03. These findings bring up another important ~ o i n t In
. addition to their function in sait and water
baiance, the gilis of tadpoles are also important sites of acidbase regulation and NH,' excretion. Dietz and Aivarado
(1974) reported net NH,' excretion in Rana catesbeiana tadpoles of 260 nEq1g.h. McDonald et ai. (1984) reported net
losses of NH; for Rana clamitans of 634 nEq1g.h. In addition, NH,' excretion in postmetamorphic animais was 12%
of that in premetamorphic animais, indicating that the weilcharacterized switch from ammoniotely to ureotely had been
completed. In the terrestrial BufO bufO, this switch starts at
the time when forelimbs are developed under the operculum
and accelerates with f o r e h b emergence but does not occur
in the aquatic Xenupus luevis (Munro 1953).
Effects of Temperature
When tadpoles are exposed to cold temperatures (e.g., 4"C),
they rapidly increase in mass because of the uptake of water.
The water content of Rana muscosa tad~oles
increased bv 6%
I
after 1month of exposure to 4"C, after which water content
remained stable for 7 months (Bradford 1984a). Between 7
and 12 months of exposure, water content again increased
slightiy. During the first month of exposure, the osmotic
pressure of the peritoneal fluid dropped by 14%, approached control values after 7 months, and then again declined at 12 months. It appears that water uptake is accommodated by the extraceilular fluid volume (ECF; Bradford
1984a). In a related study, S. C. Brown et al. (1986) studied
the weight loss in cold-acchated (5C) tadpoles after return to warmer temperatures. Rana catesbeiana tadpoles
transferred to 11" and 18C lost 7% and 10% of body
weight after 5 days, whde plasma Na+ concentration increased by 28% and 21%, respectively. Daily treatment with
ovine prolactin or growth hormone prevented weight loss
or the concornitant increase in plasma Na+ concentration.
Neither propylthiouracil nor arginine vasotocin had an
effect. These authors concluded that the changes in plasma
solutes reflected changes in ECF volume. The adaptive significance, ifany, of cold-induced edema in larval or adult anurans is not known. It would be interesting to know ifwater
gain was simply because of an inhibition of osmotic regulatory mechanisms at low temperature, or if it is a specific
physiological adaptation to winter conditions.
Effects of Salinity
Frogs occur in aquatic habitats that range widely in salinity.
Many habitats are extremely dilute, such as soft-water bogs,
rainwater fiiled temporary ponds, and water in granitic basins. Rana catesbeiana tadpoles can be reared in distiiled water (Aivarado and Moody 1970). Similar to frogs and fishes,
exposure to distilled water or very dilute solutions stimulates
PHYSIOLOGY
the sodium transport system. Elevated V, for Na+ transport and an unchanged Km (Dietz and Aivarado 1974;
Freda and Dunson 1986) may reflect an increase in the total
number of transport sites. Freda and Dunson (1986) also
found that exposure to high Na+ concentrations increased
Km and depr&sed V,,,,. ~ h e s changes
e
in the characteristics
of the transport mechanism would help maintain Na+ balance in dilute water and reduce energetic costs of ion regulation in water with high concentrations of Na+. It is not
known whether branc6al or s h permeability is adjusted in
response to water saiinity.
Some amphibians occur in highly saline habitats such as
ponds and streams d u e n c e d by saltwater spray or tidai
movements and desert ponds as they evaporate. The majority of field studies have focused on the distribution of aduits
with referente to salinity (Christrnan 1974; Ruibai 1959,
1962). Manv s~ecieshave been found in braciush salt
marshes, and it appears that species vary in their tolerance to
salinity. A few specialized species (Bufo viridis and Limnonectes cancrivoms) can survive in 40% and fuli-strength seawater, respectively (M. S. Gordon 1962; M. S. Gordon and
Tucker 1965; M. Uchiyama et al. 1990). Very few studies of
to habitat salinity
the distribution of tadpoles with regard
have been re~orted.
The best:known euryhahe amphibian is the crab-eating frog (Limmnectescancrivoms) of southeastern Asia. The
aduits and tadpoles may be found in braciush water ponds
and mangrove swamps. The tadpoles can survive exposure
to fdi-strength seawater (M. S. Gordon and Tucker 1965;
M. Uchiyama et al. 1990; M. Uchiyama and Yoshizawa
1992) and have been found in ponds ranging from 16% to
75% seawater (M. S. Gordon and Tucker 1965; Dunson
1977). However, M. S. Gordon and Tucker (1965) couid
not induce tadpoles to metamorphose in the lab if water
salinity was griater than 20% Seawater, and the largest
tadpoles were obsemed in the most saline ponds. These
obsemations suggest that L. cancrivoms tadpoles cannot
metamorphose at high salinities, but this suggestion awaits
more rigorous verification. The adults are osmoconformers
and are able to survive in highly saline waters by elevating
plasma urea, which raises plasma osmotic pressure and
thereby elirninates the driving force for the dehydration that
would occur in saltwater. Larvae are osmoregulaters; ifwater
salinity is increased from 100% freshwater to 100% saltwater (a more than 10-fold increase in osmotic pressure),
plasma osmotic pressure only doubles (M. S. Gordon and
Tucker 1965). Over d salinities (0%-100% seawater),
90%-100% of the osmotic pressure of plasma is caused by
Na+. K+. and C1-. Similar to marine teleost fishes. these tadpeles osmoregulate in seawater by d r i n h g th hyperosmotic medium and by excreting a s m d amount of isosmotic
urine. Aithough it hai never bein verified, the tadpoles probably excrete salts by an extrarenal pathway such as Na+ transporters in the skin and gis. M. S. Gordon and Tucker
(1965) also found that tadpoles become osmoconformers as
froglets (Taylor/Kollros XXV, Gosner 46). In 80% seawater,
starting at Taylor/Kollros XX (Gosner 42), plasma osmotic
pressure increased and plasma Na+, K+, and CI- concentra,
213
tions did not change. This pattern was presumably the resuit
of the initiation of urea production. More detailed experimental data are clearly needed on the physiology of this interesting species.
Effects of LowpH
Concern over acidic precipitation has stimuiated a great deal
of recent research on the effects of acidic water on amphibians. Lowered rain pH over the northeastern United States,
southeastern Canada and Europe has been implicated in the
depression of alkalinity and pH of many freshwater habitats.
Acidic mine drainage associated with coal and metal strip
mining can also seriously impact freshwater habitats (Kinney
1964; Porges et ai. 1986). Aithough anthropogenic acidification has received much attention, it is generdy not
realized that many freshwater habitats are acidic because of
naturdy occurring humic acids or the biological activity of
Sphapum (reviews by Gorham et al. 1985; Kilham 1982;
see Rosenberg and Pierce 1995). Naturdy acidic waters
have been described throughout the world: major branches
of the Amazon and Congo rivers (Marlier 1973); boreal
peat bogs of North America, Europe, and Asia (Gorham
et al. 1985); many waters of the eastern and Gulf Coastal
plain of the United States (Gosner and Black 1957%) and
the southwest cape of South Africa (Picker 1985; Picker et
al. 1993); heathlands of Great Britain (Beebee and Grifin
1977); swamps of Maiaysia (D. S. Johnson 1967); and
ponds of northern Austraiia (T. E. Brown et al. 1983). Detailed discussions of the distribution of acidic waters in the
United States, the relative tolerance of different species, and
the ecological effects of acidic waters are reviewed by Freda
(1986) and Pierce (1985). Tadpoles are more tolerant of low
environmental pH than embryos but less so than aduits
(Freda 1986). Amphibians as a group are much more tolerant than fishes. The primary toxic effect of low pH is dismption of Na+ and CI- balance (Freda and Dunson 1984; McDonaid et al. 1984). Acute exposure to lethal p H mhibits
the active uptake of Na+ and C1- while causing a massive
stimuiation in passive Na+ and C1- loss. InAux of Na+ is linearly related to pH and 100% inhibition occurs near pH 4.0.
The loss of Na+ increases exponentidy just above the lethal
pH. In d species tested, death occurs when body Na+concentration is reduced by about one-half. The increased efflux
of Na+ and C1- at low pH is quantitatively responsible for
the reductions in body ions, and variation in the rate of loss
defines intra- and interspecific variation in acid tolerance
(Freda and Dunson 1984). The inhibition of Na+ influx may
be caused by direct competition of H + and Na+ for the carrier sites (which may not be the sarne for the two ions), as
increasing the concentration of Na+ in acidic water elevates
Na+ uptake (Freda and Dunson 1986). Ion loss presumably
occurs across the s h and giils. In fishes it is thought that
Na+ loss at low pH results from the leaching of calcium from
the branchial epithelium, which opens up tight junctions
and compromises the structurai integrity of the gdi epithelium (Freda and McDonald 1988; also see Suffler 1996).
Chronic exposure to sublethal p H generdy causes a 20%
decline in body Na+concentration and stimulates compensa-
214
Summary
To understand the ecological physiology of tadpoles as a
group, it is essential to examine phylogeneticdy diverse tua
and diverse environmental conditions. At present, most of
the knowledge about tadpole ecological physiology is based
on very iunited subsets of taxa and environmental settings.
For example, most ecophysiological studies have been done
with temperate zone species, rather than tropical species, yet
the greatest diversity of taxa are tropical. Even within the
temperate zone, the preponderance ofwork has been iunited
to members of the Bufonidae and Ranidae. In part, this
is because relatively few investigations have been conducted
on amphibian larvae in comparison to aduit amphibians
and other vertebrate groups. Also, these studies have often
sought to understand how amphibian larvae d s e r from
aduits and other vertebrates rather than to understand how
tadpole biology M e r s among species and environments. Investigators have tended to work with local species or species
easiiy maintained in the laboratory.
Future ecophysiological studies should ask questions
concerning the interaction of environmental parameters and
the physiology of tadpoles in environmental settings that are
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank T. Dietz, A. Riggs, and R. J. Wassersug for editing
parts of this chapter. Additional cornnients were provided
by W. Burggren and M. Feder. Bradford acknowledges the
environmental Science and Engineering Program at the University of California, Los Angeles, for support during the
early stage of preparation of t h s chapter.
BEHAVIOR
Interactions and Their
Consequences
Karin vS. Hoff, Andrew R. Blaustein,
Roy W. McDiarmid, and Ronald Altig
Introduction
A tadpole is an energy-gathering,growing, nonreproductive
larvai stage in the biphasic anuran life cycle. Various authors
(e.g., Wdbur and Cohns 1973) have modeled the impacts
that different aquatic environments have on tadpole gr&th
and feeding, and growing to the largest size in the shortest
period remains a driving force for selection. Optirnizing
growth enhances the probability of completing metamorphosis and reaching the reproductive stage. Forms of paedomorphosis that result in a larval individual capable of reproduction occur in saiamanders but are unknown in anurans.
As a resuit, behaviors usuaiiy associated with sexual activity
and species recognition (e.g., courtship displays) among reproductive adults are absent in larvae. Instead, the behaviorai repertoire of tadpoles is restricted to activities that augment development, growth, and survival to metamorphosis.
Aggregations of tadpoles in nature are relatively common
(see Duellman and Tmeb 1986; Lescure 1968; Lyapkov
1996; P. J. Watt et al. 1997) and may be interpreted broadly
as ecophysiological, metamorphc, feeding, and social responses. Relative to aggregative behavior, we focus primarily
on feeding and social interactions.
Three basic subject areas provide the organization for this
chapter: (1) aspects of general maintenance (feedmg, respiration, thermoregulation, and locomotion); (2) dispersion
and social behaviors (habitat selection. social interactions.
and kin recognition); and (3) sensory abilities (vision, cutaneous senses, olfaction, and chemical communication) and
learning. Tadpole behavior is not weii studied, and we point
out specific areas that need attention.
i
notations of developmental stages foilow the system
of Gosner (1960; see table 2.1 and fig. 2.1).
General Maintenance
Feedin~
Tadpoles usuaiiy are considered highly speciahzed, fiiterfeeding herbivores (e.g., Duellman and Tmeb 1986). Most
ingest planktonic material from the water column, obtain organic materiais from pond sediments, or scrape material
(i.e., aufwuchs, periph~on)from submerged substrates.
Given the diverse and son~etimesbizarre morphology of
their feeding structures, the variety of sizes and kmds of food
items recorded in their guts, the absence of ceiiuiase for digesting plant materials, the diversity of microhabitats occupied, and our lack of basic knowledge of their diets determined from conventional gut content analyses convinces us
that tadpoles are better thought of as opportunistic omnivores or detritivores.
216
Stimuli emanating from food sources that initiate locomotor or feeding responses (e.g., P. H . Harrison 1990)
also have not been studied well. Svstematic and com~arative
evaluations of the food habits of tadpoles are uncommon
(but see Diaz-Paniagua 1985; Heyer 1973b; Inger 1986 and
referentes therein) and generaily not very informative because many ingested items pass undanlaged through the gut,
whiie other soft-bodied oreanisms
and bacteria are not dea
tected. Such observations have led some authors to suggest
that the real sources of food for tadpoles may be dissolved
inorganic and orgaxiic nutrients, bacteria, and viruses (Heyyr
1973b; Inger 1986). The contribution of these s m d itcms
to tadpole diets remains unstudied in nature, and that part
of thematerial that a tadpole ingests that is actually digeSted
is not known.
Items re~ortedfrom the Vm t s of tad~olesinclude sand.
detritus, viruses, bacteria, smaii unicellular organisms (protists), algae (diatoms, filarnentous green, euglenophytes),
plant fragments of assorted sizes, pollen grains, hngi, various kinds of s m d animals (axmelids, cladocerans, copepods,
gastrotrichs, insccts, nematodes, rotifers, tardigrades, water
mites), anuran eggs, and heterospechc and conspecific tadpoles (Costa and Balasubramaniam 1965; Diaz-Paniagua
1985; J. D. Harrison 1987; Heyer 1973b; Inger 1986; Lajmanovich 1994; Sabnis and Kuthe 1980; Sekar 1992). Tadpoles also are known to feed on fecal material (Steinwascher
1978a) and swldry typcs of carrion (= necrophagous group
of Beiswenger 1975). In all cases, caution must be exercised
in interpreting feeding habits and their possible correlations
with morphology. A. Haas (personal communication) recently found intact ephemeropteran larvae in an unidentified
~oophistadpole from ~ a d a ~ & c aThis
r . situation was unexpected in a suctorial tadpolc that lives in very fast water and
maintains position with an exceptionaily large oral disc.
Research has focused on evidence of food selection from
several approaches: stomach content analysis (e.g., Jenssen
1967); comparative aspects of buccal anatomy related to
feeding (e.g., Viertel 1985; Wassersug 1980); comparative
mechanical restrictions on feeding behavior based on anatomy a i d limitcd experimentation(e.g., Wassersug and Hoff
1979); feeding dynamics of a smaii number of species in the
laboratory (e.g., Sede 1980); and relationshps between
feeduig modes and microhabitat use, oral morphology, diet,
and phylogenetic groups (e.g., Altig and Johnston 1989;
Diaz-Paniagua 1985; Heyer 1973b; Ingcr 1986). Warkentin
(1992a, b) examincd the effects of temperatiire and Uumination on microhabitat use and feeding rates of Rana clamitans tadpoles.
Most tadpoles feed by producing currents that carry particles into the bucal cavitv and across food entraDment surfaces. A tadpole opens its mouth (ser fig. 4.16), depresses
the floor of the buccal ca~ityto draw in water, closes the
mouth, and then elevates th floor of the buccal cavitv to
pump water across food entrapment surfaces and out
through the spiracle(s) (e.g., De Jongh 1968; Gradwell
1972b, c; Kenny 1969b, c; Severtsov 1969a; Wassersug
1972).
Tadpoles occur in countless aquatic habitats, feed at many
sites (benthic, midwater, surface) throughout the water column, and have characteristic morphologies and behaviors.
To demonstrate t h s ecological and morphological diversity
and to provide some background for reading this chapter,
we illustrate two somewhat hypothetical larval comm~mities,
one typical of a forest pond
9.1) and the other of a forest
stream (fig. 9.2). VCTeselected our examples from the Neotropical region because that is a fauna with whch we are
familiar. It also is broadly representative of faunas in other
tropical regions, which are ecologicaily arid taxonomicaily
diverse compared to tliose in comparable habitats in temperate zones. More detailed illustrations of these and other tadpole morphotypes are shown in figure 12.1, and their associated mouthparts are shown in figure 12.2.
Heyer (1973b) described the microhabitat use, feeding
and swimming behavior, and diet of pond-dwehlg tadpolcs
of 1 7 species in a dry forest site in Thailand, and Inger
(1986) a l d Ingcr et ai. (1986a) reported a comparable study
for 12 stream and 4 nonriparian tadpoles of 16 frog species
from a wet forest site in Borneo. Pond tadpoles of the African frog Xenupus laevis are typicaiiy positioned head downward at about 4S0, while those of&alychnis p w e l l i (Duellman and Trueb 1986) and otlier phyllomedusine hylids
usuaiiy position thcmselves upward a t .about 45'. suspension-feediig microhylid tadpoles usuaiiy float horizontdy
near the surface or in midwater, and tadpoles of Rbinopbvynus dorsalir usuaiiy swim horizontaiiy.
The buccal purnping mechanism is similar in at least ail
rasping tadpoles, but species d 8 e r in the efficicncy of entrapment based on the sizes (i.c., 0.126 in Wassersug 1972 to
greatcr than 200 p.m in Seale 1980) of particles that are capGred. These differences in efficiency have been correlated
with variations in skeletal elements of the purnp (Wassersug
1972; Wassersug and Hoff 1979) and density of the giil aters (Wassersug 1972). Tadpoles without keratiriized mouthparts (e.g., G ~ o p h l y n eandXenopus) cannot graze on plant
material that is too laree
" to fit into their mouths. and tadpoles lacking ultraplanktonic entrapment surfaces (e.g., Hymenocbirur) feed on items large enough to be retained without entrapment surfaces.
Wassersug and Hoff (1979) noted specific behavioral correlates with buccal pump design. Deflcaion of the floor of
the cavity by a levcr aaion of the ceratohyal causes the buccal
cavity to act as a hydraulic pump. The area of the bucal cavity floor, the length of the lever, and the amount of deflection
determine maximum buccal volume and maximum suction
force (negative pressure) generated by the pump. Microphagous tadpoles tend to have large buccal volumcs and short
lever arms and regulate fecding rate by frequency moduiation (FM) of pumping frequency (e.g., Xenopus laevzs). Tadpoles with relatively longer lever arms vary buccal volumes
and pressures by amplitude modulation (AM)of the ceratohyal defleaion (e.g., Rana yl17atica). Suctorial forms that
rely on buccal suction to adhere to surfaces (e.g., hcaphus)
have large lever arms and smail buccal volumes to generate
high pressurcs. Macrophagous tadpoles have large volumes
and long lever arms.
The validity of morphological modeling to predict feed-
(fig.
BEHAVIOR
ing behaviors is supported by studies of feeding dynamics in 1997; aiso see Caidweii and De Arajo 1998 and Nguenga
Ranu ylv&
and Xempus laePrj (Sede et ai. 1982 and Sede et ai. 1997). In their review of arboreai tadpoles, Lannoo
and Wassersug 1979; see feeding dynamics below) and aiso et ai. (1987) tabulated species known to consume frog eggs;
is consistent with the suggestion (Wassersug and Seibert other hylids that breed in phytotelmata (i.e., bromeliads and
1975) that the buccal pump design of tadpoles refleas feed- tree holes), including Phrynohym resinzjhm (R. W. McDiaring more than respiratory needs (see Respiration below).
mid, personal observation), Osteocephalus d.iqmeurii (R W.
Polis and Myers (1985) tabulated 14 species
fiogs McDiarmid, personal observation), 0.oophqgus (Jungfer and
whose tadpoles ate conspecific tadpoles or eggs, and other Schiesari 1995); Anothecu spinosa (Jungfer 1996) and 0.
species have been added to the list (e.g., Osteopilus ieptencvio- phnieps (L. Haugen, personai cornrnunication) can be added
dIj,Crump 1986; aiso see table 10.2). Crurnp (1986) dis- to that list. ChirUcdw etfingm' (Rhacophoridae)nests in tree
tinguished between opportunistic cannibalism (such as oo- holes and broken or cut bamboo stems and has oophagous
phagy and necrophagy, in which the prey does not attempt tadpoles (Ueda 1986; Karn et al. 1996). Tadpoles ofPhilautus
to evade the predator, and cannibahsm, in which conspecifics sp. aiso found in a tree hole in Thailand apparently feed on
are attacked, killed, and eaten (e.g., Summers and Amos frog eggs, likely their own (Wassersug et ai. 1981a).
218
K A R I N vS. H O F F , A N D R E W B L A U S T E I N , R O Y M c D I A R M I D , R O N A L D A L T I G
Cannibalism may be more common than reported, especiaiiy among tadpoles of frogs that breed in smaii, ephemerai
ponds and phytotelmata (e.g., bromeliads and tree holes)
that are subject to unprediaable drying or where resource
shortages and overcrowding may be common and survivorship low (Bragg 1957, 1965; Crump 1986, 1990, 1992;
Downie 1990b; see chap. 10). Cannibaiistic tadpoles most
commonly eat conspecifics of different sizes or develop-
BEHAVIOR
have not aiwavs made it clear whether the orev were aireadv
dead before they were eaten. However, conspecific tadpole
cannibaiism has been observed in the field (Cmmp 1990,
Hyhpseudupuma); Petranka and Thomas (1995) argued that
explosive breeding in Rana sylvatica reduced egg and tadpole cannibalism.
In laboratory studies, Cmmp (1986) dowed tadpoles of
Osteopilus septencrionalis to me&norphose in aquaha with
emergent surfaces to reduce the likehhood of drowning. The
presence of these surfaces did not eliminate cannibalism by
younger tadpoles in the sarne aquaria, and rnetarnorphosing
tadpoles (Gosner 42-43) in both experimental treatments
(i.e., those that were not eaten by conspecifics) climbed up
the verticai glass waiis. Aii metarnorphosing froglets survived in the control treatments (i.e., those without younger
conspecifics). It seems k e l y that cannibaiism, at least in this
species, is active predation by younger (Gosner 36-39) tadpoles, perhaps siblings. Cmmp (1986) speculated that metamorphosing tadpoles were more vuinerable to predation because they had diminished locomotor capacity compared to
either tadpoles without forelegs or froglets without taiis.
Wassersug and Sperry (1977) aiso demonstrated that anurans in the middle of metarnorphosis (four legs and a tail)
do not swim as fast as tadpoles younger
- than Gosner 42 or
hop as far as froglets older than stage 45. It may be that
tadpoles prey preferentiaiiy on conspecific tadpoles when
they are most vuinerable; t h s is the same stage at whch they
are aiso preferentiaiiy preyed upon by other species (e.g.,
Tbamnuphis, S. J. Arnold and Wassersug 1978).
Some tadpoles (e.g., Hymenocbims and Lepidobatracbus)
are specialized for consuming large food items (Wassersug
and Hoff 1979). and some are activelv
, oredaceous on heterospecifics. The hypertrophied jaw serrations of the tadpoles
of Otopbryne pyburni (Wassersug and Pyburn 1987) and
Mantdu@ylus lu.ubrtr (R. Altig, personai observation) superficidy appeai to be specializa~onsfor carnivory but are
probably used to sort particles during filtration processes.
Wassersug and Pyburn (1987) suggested that the tadpole of
Otopbrynepyburni feeds by passive aspiration caused by water
flowing past the aperture of the elongate spiracle tube.
An arnazing example of feeding behavior and parentoffspring com&unica<on has been dlocumented in &e Centrai Arnerican frog, Dendrobatespumilw. After 10-12 days of
development, tadpoles hatch from eggs (clutchesrange from
5 to 20 eggs; mean of 10 clutches = 10.9) laid and fertiiized
on horizontal dry leaves (Weygoldt 1980). The femaie parent transports a single tadpole on her back to a suitable bromeliad and releases the tadpole in a leaf axii with water. Periodicdy (1-9 day intervals), she returns, inspects the leaf axil
holding her tadpole, and deposits an unfertilized egg which
the tadpole eats. When a tadpole of D. pumilw detects (see
Sensory Abilities, Vision) a frog visiting the bromeliad axii
in which it lives, it begins a speciai tail-vibrating "dance" that
can be seen by the visiting frog. Instead of swimming with
the usual taii undulations.' the \tadoole
creates noticeable cirI
cular movements beneath the water surface by stiffening and
rapidly vibrating its taii. If the visitor is the femaie parent
coming to feed her tadpole, she backs into the axd and the
L
, A
219
220
Two other interesting examples apparently involve communication between the tadpole and parent. Wager (1929)
reported maternal care in Hmisus mammatzw. Femaies remain in a hoilowed-out cavity atop the developing eggs until
they hatch. Newly hatched tadpoles are lively and "indefatigable wrigglers." Based on excavations of burrows and other
circurnstantial evidence, Wager (1929: 129) commented that
". . . it seems certain therefore that the mother burrows towards the water making a tunnel down which the tadpoles
wriggle in a squirming mass until they reach the water."
These observations were repeated without qualification by
Wager (1965, 1986) and have been repeated in the general
literature (e.g., Dueiiman and Tmeb 1986). On reviewing
d the published reports, Van Dijk (1985) rejeaed Wager's
scenario and noted that others had reported hatched larvae
swarrning over the back of an attending female and on the
back of another frog, presumably a female. Van Dijk suggested that female Hemhus carry their tadpoles to the water.
M.-O. Rodel (personal communication) reported tadpoles
foiiowing a female as she constmcted an open channel from
the nest to water; during this period some of the tadpoles
BEHAVIOR
221
Fig. 9.4. Tadpole holes (depressionsin the muddy botmm) formed by feeding tadpoles of Buf anwhXr
(Bufonidae), photographed in June in Jackson County, Mississippi.
BEHAVIOR
223
lua& and fitted the data to either a rnodified Monod spatial distribution of potentiai tadpole foods in ponds must
(Michaelis-Menten) or an energy optimization model. Tad- accornpany future laboratory seiection experiments. Ponds
pole feeding dynamics resernble those of other suspension- that experiente intense aigai bloorns (e.g., Sede 1980) rnay
feeding organisms and provide for both high energy return not present opportunities for selection among food types.
to the tadpole and stabhty of populations of food organMany authors have suggested that microhabitat use and
isms. Xenopus b s tadpoles, presented with concentrations temporal partitioning (e.g., Degani 1982; Heyer 1976a; Inof food (yeast) ranging from 5 X 10-3 to 5 X 102mglliter, ger 1986; Loschenkohl1986; chap. 10) reduce interspecific
increased feeding rates as food concentrations increased until cornpetition for food among tadpoles. Laboratory rneasurea maxirnum ingestion rate was attained. Sede et ai. (1982) ments of growth rates in Hyhgratiosa versus Hyiufemoralis
speculated that the rnaximum ingestion rate was determined indicate that one species rnay decrease the growth rate in
bv gut packmg or by saturation of the gili iiters. The low another and that this effect is variable among sibships (Trafod concentrations (below about 0.1 mg/liter) at which vis 1980b). Although Steinwascher (1978b) detected both
tadpoles cease to feed is presumed to reflect an autoregula- chemical interference and behavioral exvloitation comvetitory rnechanisrn that avoids energy loss during atternpts to tion in laboratory experiients with Rana sphenocephaiu, beharvest scarce resources. Feeding cessation aiso provides a haviors associated with exploitation competition have not
concentration refinium for food iterns so that s&ce items been rigorously examined- Larger tadpoies probably push
are not elirninated. Work with a population ofRana catesbei- smaiier tadpoles away frorn food patches, aithough this
a m in a natural pond showed that phytoplankton popula- would most likely occur only with particulate food sources
aons responded reasonably weii and their density stabilized and at high tadpole densities relative to food availability
at the concentrations that were predicted by the laboratory (Travis 1980b; Werner 1994). Also, a tadpole of one feeding
eqxriments (i.e., d e r aigai bloorns, the concentration grad- rnode (e.g., rasps and swims actively) rnay physicaiiy interually decreased and stabilized at about the refigium concen- fere with a tadpole of another feedmg type (e.g., suspension
uation predicted in the laboratory; Sede 1980). Viertel feeder rernains quiescent). Chemical interference rnay have
( 1990, 1991) showed that tadpoles at early stages of devel- no obvious behavioral correlates beyond preferential assoopment rnay have lower threshold concentrations (the low- ciations or avoidance (see Social Behavior below). R. A.
est concentration at which feedmg starts) than older tad- Griffiths (1991) noted that cornpetition rnediated by nutripoles.
ent depression rnay occur between species in the absence of
Farlowe (1928) assumed that tadpoles were indiscrimi- physical interactions.
nate suspension feeders and used intestinal contents as an
index of the aigai constituents of ponds. Jenssen (1967, Respiratwn
Rana ciumitans) and Hendricks (1973, Ranapipiens) found Tadpoles respire through the skin, gills, and lungs (Respirathat foregut contents of tadpoles and water column constit- tory Physiology, chap. 8). Most work on tadpole respiratory
uents were indistingushable. Tadpoles also graze on peri- behavior has focused on the rates of ventilation with differphyton and epiphytic aigae (Dickman 1968; see L. M. John- ent oxygen availabilities, development of lung use, partison 1991; Kamat 1962; and Sahu and Khare 1988 for other tioning air and water breathing, trade-offs between respirastudies of tadpole feeding habits), epibenthic algae (Caief tion and feeding, and the relationshp between respiration
1973), and their own fecai peiiets (Steinwascher 1978a). and locomotor performance (e.g., Watkins 1997). Tadpoles
The issue of selection among these patchy food sources has that use both giils and lungs respond to changes in dissolved
not been addressed, but C. L. Taylor et ai. (1995) showed oxygen (DO) concentration by varying the rate of air breaththat tadpoles can choose among foods of differint nutri- inn. To breath air. tadvoles characteristicaiivswim to the surtionai quaiities.
face, quickly ili the buccai cavity with air, and rapidly swim
During an examination of ingestion rates of five larvae down again ( = "bobbing" of Wassersug and Seibert 1975;
(Bufo amhcanus, B. woodhousii fmieri, Pseudacris crucqer, S. Wong and Booth 1994). Bobbing rates are consistent
Rana catesbeiana, and R. sylvatica), Seale and Beckvar (1980) with the state of lung development in tadpoles of Bufo woodassumed that ingestion rates were indicative of food prefer- housii, Pseudamis trt>meiLata,
and Rana pipiens; these forrns
ence. They demonstrated some differences among species showed a significant negative correlation between D O conthat were fed on single aigal cultures but found no differ- centration &d bobbinc rate once D O was below a criticai
ences with R. catesbeiana when six species of green and blue- vaiue. The bobbing r z e of Spea bomb@ons was negatively
green aigae were offered. In aii cases, tadpoles appeared to correlated with D O throughout the range of DO concentraadjust feeding rate to food volume or biornass (see Sede and tions used. Air bubbles t&n into the biccal cavity rnay pro\Vassersug 1979). Tadpoles of Pseudacris cmcifer had a much vide oxygen by absorption through the operculum, filter aphigher threshold concentration (= food concentration be- paratus, and waiis of the buccai cavity. The tadpoles of Bufo
low whch feeding ceases) than did those of E. w. fowleri or woodhousii, essentiaiiy lungless untii rnetamorphosis, rnay
R. catesbeiana when these species were fed a iiamentous not take atmosvheric air into their buccai cavities but mav
blue-green alga (Anabaena spherica). These findings suggest come to the oxygen-rich surface water for longer periods of
that the concentration range over which food is available time to take in oxygen through the skin (chap. 8).
rnay W e r among tadpoles -and rnay afFect seleaion of food
Feder (1983a) noted increases in lung ventiiation as a req e s (e.g., Anholt and Werner 1995). Studies of the micro- sponse to aquatic hypoxia in Rana beriundieri, and West and
Y
224
Burggren (1983) found the converse; forced lung ventila- ature selection has not been identified (also see Behavioral
tion per se (as weli as the resulting increase in PO,) contrib- Thermoregulation in chap. 8). There have been numerous
uted to the suppression of gill ventilation in Rana catesbei- speculations on its adaptiveness, but there i5 no consensus
ana, although the lungs contributed relatively little to gas that any factor(s) (e.g., developmental changes, energy
exchange at early developmental stages. As tadpoles ap- metabolism, gas exchange, osmoregulation, predator avoidproach metamorphosis, the lungs increase in importance be- ance) adequately explains the observed behavioral temperacause of increased oxygen demands, and aquatic respiratory ture selection in any species. Most of the hypotheses rebehavior (gili ventilation rate) in Ranapipiens increased with viewed by Brattstrom (1979) remain untested. Lefcort and
D O concentration in tadpoles at Gosner 4 1 (Wassersug and Eiger (1993) discussed how a fever caused by a pathogen
Seibert 1975). Differential abilitv to use aerial and aauatic influenced tadpole behavior and may influente pathogen
oxygen resulted in interspecific differences in locomotor transmission.
Cupp (1980) found interspecific, geographical, and ontostamina (time to fatigue) under conditions of hypoxia (Wassersug and Feder 1983). Comparisons of lungless Bufo amer- genetic differences in the critical thermal maxima ( a m ;
icanus versus R. berlandieri and Xenopus laevts (which use Bufo woohousii, Gasr~ophrynecarolinensis, Rana catesbeiana,
both lungs and gdls; see Pronych and Wassersug 1994) andR. sylvatica, but not in Pseudacris trrkeriata).Of those that
showed that air-breathing tadpoles could moderate the re- showed changes in the CT, the highest temperature was
duction in stamina se& in dl species in hypoxic water. tolerated by tadpoles in Gosner 3 0 4 0 . Dupr and Petranka
Breathing air also reduces stamina because of increased (1985) noted similar ontogenetic trends in final thermal prebuoyancy (X. l m k , Wassersug and Feder 1983; Campeny ferendum (ETP;mem temperature selected by tadpoles in
and Casinos 1989), increases exposure and risk of predation thermal gradients) of several tadpoles including PseudanZc
(Feder 1984), and reduces growth rate because of the meta- triseriata; the ETP peaked sharply at premetamorphic stages
bolic cost of surfacing to breathe (Pandian and Marian and did not track precisely the development of CT, noted
by Cupp (1980) and Sherman (1980). Dupr and Petranka
1985~).
Ontogenetic changes in buoyancy were described for five (1985) speculated that behavioral temperature selection respecies (Bgfo americanus, Hyh chrysosceli/versicolor;Pseuda- fleas changes in thermal sensitivity of cutaneous coldA s trise&zta macuhta, Rana pipiens, and R. sylaatica) at sensitive neurons (also see Crawshaw et al. 1992; Hamhatchling, larval, and early metamorphic stages by Gee and merschlag et al. 1989; Wolimuth and Crawshaw 1988; WolWaldick (1995). Hatchlings were negatively buoyant and lmuth et al. 1987).
sessile; their lGgs were no; idated. L1 b u t ~pipiens
.
were
Indeed, the many ontogenetic changes in the amphibian
neutraily buoyant through most larval stages and active in nervous system (Kollros 1981) include changes in the temmidwater; R. piiens larvae were negatively buoyant and ac- perature at which static irnpulse frequency occurred in cutative or sedentarv near the bottom. Ail svecies were neganeous cold-sensitive neurons (Ranacatesbeiana; Dupr et ai.
"
tively buoyant and benthic in metamorphic stages. Gee and 1986). Tadpoles at younger stages were not as selective of
Waldick (1995) showed that the tadpole lung has a hydro- temperature as older tadpoles, even though developmenstatic role and some species were able to regulate precisely tal trends in static irnpulse frequency of individual neurons
their buoyancy to compensate for environmental changes. and behavioral temperature selection were similar. Static irnCampeny and Casinos (1989) examined buoyancy in tad- pulse frequency usuaily occurred at somewhat lower temperapoles of the midwife toad, Alytes obstetricans (see Feder and tures than those that were behavioraily selected (Dupr et
Wassersug 1984, Pronych and Wassersug 1994, and Snet- al. 1986), and the development of additional warm-sensitive
kova et al. 1995).
neurons may also mfluence temperature selection. Such neuSuspension-feeding tadpoles use the buccal pumping rons have not yet been identified. Other aquatic ectotherms
mechanism for both food and oxygen uptake. Feder et al. (including sal&ander larvae) modulate temperame selec(1984b) found that tadpoles of Xenopus h i s increased tion in response to hypoxia (Dupr and Wood 1988), but
buccopharyngeal respiration in hypoxic water at the expense this has not been examined in anuran larvae.
of feeding when prevented from breathing air; food ingestion decreased even though buccal pumping rate increased,
and tadpoles likely actively suppressed mucus secretion to Anuran larvae are not shaped like any other aquatic vertereduce food entrapment rate. Wassersug and Murphy brate. Tadpoles have globose bodies, no lateral h s , and a
(1987) noted that aerial respiration promoted growth in ob- relatively long, muscular, flexible t d that comprises most of
ligate suspension feeding Xenopus. Feder et al. (1984b) spec- the body length (Hoff and Wassersug 1985; Wassersug
ulated that the evolution of air breathine" in aauatic verte- 1989a; chap. 3). This shape suggests that tadpoles swim
brates occurred as the result of selection for the complete differently from more typical aquatic vertebrates, such as
dedication of the buccopharyngeal surfaces to feeding.
fishes, and often has led to the assumption that tadpole
swimrning is relatively ineffective and uncontrolied. Recent
studies h& shown ihat many aspects of the swimrning
Although tadpoles ofien aggregate in warmer areas of ponds movements of tadpoles do not differ greatiy from those of
and sometimes follow changing patterns of suniight (Bratt- typical subcarangiiform fishes, such as trout (Wassersug and
strom 1962; Schley et al. 1997), the mechanism for temper- Hoff 1985).
BEHAVIOR
225
by dragonfly naiads (see Sensory Abilities, chemical communication, later in this chapter). In the Wassersug and Hoff
studies, the highest steady velocity was about 12 body
lengths/sec.
The maximuni amplitude of a tadpole tail beat (measured
at the tip) increases graduaiiy as swimming speed increases
to an asymptotic vaiue of about 0.25 body lengths. Tadpoles
with relatively longer taiis (e.g., Rana clamitans or R. septentriomalir compared to B. americanus or Rama catesbeiana) had
a relatively lower maximum amplitude, but ali amplitudes
were well within the range of steady swimming recorded for
many species of fishes. Because of the odd shape of pondtype tadpoles (i.e., heavdy weighted toward the front end
as compared to many streamined fishes), a head wobble is
apparent during s&ing.
~ u b s e ~ u e study
nt
(Hoff and
Wassersug 1985) has shown that these standard kinematic
measures that relate to efficiency and control (e.g., maximum amplitude of the traveling wave at ali points aiong the
body) are similar among tadpoles of severai bufonid and ranid species and subcarangiiform (i.e., troutlike) fishes. Indeed, the apparent head wobble is in large part an iilusion
created bv &e snout movinp: from side to Side. The vivot
point for ihis motion is on $e sagittai line between thi otic
capsules (Wassersug and Hoff 1985) and not more posteriorly at the center of the body mass. This suggests that
tadpoles have some mechanism for adjusting that point of
minimum amplitude (i.e., minimurn laterai displacement)
and may invest considerable energy in maintaining stabiiity
during swimming. It is reasonabk to expect that &e po&t
of minimum laterai displacement would be in the vicinity of
the semicircular canais so that equiiibriurn is not effected by
the side-to-side movements of the head. Wassersup: (1992)
showed that a tadpole can bend its body verticdy & &at
upward and downward movements.
The mechanicai efficiency of tadpole swimming, measured as the relationshiv btween tGl beat frequenq and
swimming speed, f d s Aear the middle of the range fr ali
fish species described (Hoff and Wassersug 1985). In a more
t e l h e comvarison of the distance traveled ver tail beat
among the "average" tadpole, the "average" fish, and ambystomatid saiamander larvae, Hoff et ai. (1989) showed that
traveled farther ver tail beat than did saiaanuran tad~oles
L
mander larvae but not quite as far as the "average" fish. The
great similarity between tadpoles and many fish species suggests that mechanicai design constraints on moving through
water by laterai undulations are very strong. Although tadpoles do not cruise often or quite as well in ali regards as
the best cruising fishes, the mechanicai similarities are more
remarkable th& the differences.
Tadpoles that maintain position in midwater (e.g., Xerwpus l&; Hoff and Wassersug 1986) present a different mechanicai issue. Some aspects of their swimming mechanics
are consistent with the argument that maintenance of stability (lack of side-to-side movements) of the head is conducive
to increased feeding efficiency in obligate suspension feeders. Up to about 6 body lengths/sec, Xenopus tadpoles do not
use their entire tail for propulsion; they use only the flagellum at the end of the t
d while holding position (swimming
V
226
down against their own buoyancy) and gradually recruit surprisingly high maximum speeds, it is clear that most tadgreater lengths of the tail to increase swimming speed. The poles and small fishes would stiii be consurned. Their speeds
bending wave on the tail is not initiated at the base of the are inadequate when compared to the recorded velocities of
tail until the tadpoles are swimming moderately rapidly (6 feeding events by relatively large, potential predators of tadbody lengths/sec); at these speeds the tadpoles probably poles (i.e., lunging and gape-and-suck feeding in several fish
cease feedmg. Restricting lateral movement to the end of the species). The ability t o evade a predator Uely depends on
tail. combined with a midventral keel-like extension of the the sensory capabilities of the predator and prey and the
tail fin onto the body, probably contribute greatly to main- complexity of the habitat and avadability of cover, as w e l as
taining anterior stability (Hoff and Wassersug 1986). At the locomotor abiiities of a tadpole.
The neuromuscular control of iocomotion in tad~oiesis
higher swimming speeds, Bnopus tadpoles increase the tail
beat frequency of the entire tail t o increase swimming speed not completely understood. Variations in the distribution of
much like more benthic species (Wassersug and Hoff 1985); peripheral nerves in the tails ofRana andxenopw (K. Nishiat these speeds their heads have the characteristic tadpole kawa and Wassersug 1988, 1989) may relate to patterns of
muscle recruitmentthat vary with swi&ing speed. Xenopw
wobble.
Burst swimrning used for predator evasion is another has a long spinal cord and many nerves branching (presummode of swimming. Feder ( 1 9 8 3 ~ )reported that if Rana ably from different motor neurons) along its entire length
berlandieri tad~ole; ~ursuedbv turtl& could extend the that apparently innervate individual (at ieast few) muscle
chase (in som: cases Ifor 11 secJor more), the Uelihood of segments (see chap. 6). Rana tadpoles have a cauda equina
their evading predation would increase. Those experiments branching (at the point where the spinal cord ends in the
were conduaed in a large open pool with no cover for the adult) into large nerves traversing (and possibly innervating)
tadpoles and may iustrate a threshold for the attention or many muscle segments. The patterns of innervation are corthe sensory abiiity of the turtie rather than any measure of related with the observed ability ofxnopus to initiate waves
of anuran tad~olesto evade ~redators.Increas- of bending anywhere along the tad as they increase the porthe ca~acitv
1
,
ing plant density and cover (= habitat heterogeneity) has tion of the tail used with increases in swimming speed,
significant positive effeas on the survival of Bu@ tewestrtk in rather than increasing the frequency of the tail beat, as was
the presence of visual-hunting odonate naiads and giant wa- shown for tadpoles of Buf and Rana (Hoff and Wassersug
ter bugs (Babbitt and Jordan 1996; also see Bronmark and 1986). Rana tadpoles seem to use their tails in larger blocks
Edenharnm 1994 and Stauffer and Semlitsch 1993 for be- or functional units (haifthe tail or the whole tail) and initiate
havioral responses of tadpoles to fish). Tadpoles observed waves of bendmg only at the base or about at the middle of
under more natural conditions (i.e., with cover sites or bot- the tail.
tom substrate) make short dashes followed by periods of
Waves of bending pass posteriorly as the animal moves
immobility (Caldwell et al. 1980). During these predator- fonvard. It has been presumed that these traveling waves of
avoiding dashes, tadpoles move with speeds comparable t o bending are accomp&ied by waves of muscle contraction
fishes of the same size range (2-10 cm total length; W. (e.g., J. Gray 1936), but Blight (1976) suggested that at least
Webb 1978). In studies of electrically induced startle re- three patterns of muscle contraction can produce travelmg
sDonses. Hoff (1986b. 1988b) found that maximum veloc- waves of bending. Electromyographic studies of slow swimi b in a short dsh w i correlaied with the proportional and ming in several amphibians (Blight 1976, larval newts; A.
absolute amounts of axial muscle arnong tadpoles (i.e., Bufo Roberts et ai. 1984, anuran hatchhngs; and Stehouwer and
awricanus, Rana catesbeiana, R. clumita>s, R septentrionaks, Farel 1980, 1981, tadpoles) and other aquatic vertebrates
and %nopus laePZr) that varied in siix and shape. Although (Grillner 1974, dogfish; Grillner and Kashin 1976, carp)
the performances of size-matched tadpoles were broadly showed that ipsilateral axial muscles can contraa serially t o
overlapping, the performance ranks correlated with the mus- ~ r o d u c ea wave of muscle activitv that travels with the bendcle mass; Rana septentriunalis was the fastest tadpole with ing wave. Examination of other swimming activities (e.g.,
26% of its mass as axial muscle andxnopw laevis ( 3 . 5 4 . 0 starting, stopping, very slow and very fast swirnming) in
cm TL) was the slowest with 16% of its mass as axial muscle. Rana catesbeiana showed that traveling waves of bending can
Most fishes have greater amounts of axial muscle compared be produced when contralateral muscles are acting simultato any tadpole exarnined (Hoff 1988b). This disparity sug- neously and also can be transmitted passively (i.e., without
gests that muscle mass alone is not what permits compara- muscle aaivity in the posterior tail) if the wave is initiated
tively good burst swimming performance; overall body anteriorlv. It is not clear whether this rance
" of locomotor
shape may be an important factor. The maximum absolute mechanisms is specific to Rana catesbeiana or to anurans, or
velocity recorded (Hoff 1986a, 1988b) was 104 cm/sec for if it is a general feature of vertebrates that use undulatory
a largetadpole, and the hghest relative velocity was 29 body swimming.
lengths/sec for a small tadpole (about 2 cm long). The range
L. Muntz (1975) described five stages in the behavior of
in locomotor performance was very large for a11 species, and B n q w larvae relative to trunk myogenesis: nonmotile
many individuais did not respond by swimming rapidly. (NieuwkoopFaber 20-22; myotomic muscles start to
Maximum electrically inducible speeds may not be indicative differentiate), premotile (stage 22-24; first striated fibrils
of the utility of speed alone to evade predators. Even at these visible, contractions possible), early flexure (stage 24-27; re-
BEHAVIOR
227
228
Fig. 9.6. Semiterresmal mdpole of PetmpcdttEsparkcri (Ranidae).Tadpoles were found climbing on slime-covered rock faces along a road
cut through a forest in Cameroon, West Africa.
BEHAVIOR
cavity; their size implies that pulmonary respiration is important for these tadpoles (Noble 1929).
It is interesting to speculate about the origin and adaptive
nature of patterns of taii-flippingJsemiterrestnal locomotion. Undoubtedly, the precursor of this behavior can be
found in more typical tadpoles but little information is avaiiable. M. A. Smith (1916) noted that the carnivorous tadpoles of Occidozyda and Phlyno~iussuslie quietly for long periods, seldom move with their taiis, and push themselves
about with their precocial hind legs. Perhaps other examples
are in the literature but have not been evaiuated in this regard. Our understanding of the evolutionary interplay between the breeding ecology of most frogs and the feeding
and locomotion of their tadpoles is elementary. A cursory
review of the literature on more specialized patterns of
breeding (Dueiiman and Tmeb 1986), especially on frogs
that deposit eggs in relatively small and potentially ephemerai habitats such as phytotelmata, suggests fniitfd areas of
investigation. The convergent evolution of similar morphology (e.g., body shape, taii length, oral stmctures), physiology, locomotion, and feeding in different lmeages in similar
habitats is strikmg. What are the trade-offs and patterns of
convergentes between feeding and locomotion in these
difrent habitats in whch tadpoles find themselves? For example, what is the evolutionary hstory of the independent
trends toward increasing tail length, dependency on pulmonary respiration and development of semiterrestriai/tailflipping locomotion, and changes toward macrophagy as exemplified by carnivory, cannibalism, and oophagy? Surely,
more tadpole watching wi provide insight and answers to
some of these questions and bring other morphologicai and
behavioral correlates to light; we encourage such investigative .efforts.
There is considerable information on the stmcture and
funaion of hatching glands (chap. 3), but few observations
have been made across species to identi5 potential differences in the timing and actual hatching process and behavior
of the embryo (e.g., Bradford and Seyrnour 1985; Goiiman
and Goiiman 1993a; Kothbauer and Schenkel-Brunner
1981; Lutz 1944a; Noble 1926a; Yoshzaki and Yamasaki
1991). Thrashing about by embryos may enhance hatching
of other embryos in a clutch of eggs with h g h water turgor.
Physicai features like pH (e.g., Dunson and Connell 1982)
and oxygen tension (e.g., Petranka et ai. 1983) also influence
hatching; one of us (R. Aitig, personal observation) has seen
several cases where the surface-film eggs of Hyla cinerea became encased in a mat of aigae in a particuiarly eutrophic
pool. These embryos died &er reaching Gosner 25 because
they could not escape the jelly membranes.
Behavior of hatchiings is largely unknown, but specific
activities that have not been studied must occur in those
frogs that have larvai transport or some other form of larvai
brooding. Hatchlings of some endotrophs (e.g., G. J. Ingram et ai. 1975, Assa; Brauer 1898, Sooglossus secheliensis)
and exotrophs with larvai transport (e.g., De Prez et ai.
1992a, dendrobatids; Inger and Voris 1988, Inger et ai.
1986b, Limnonectes microdtrca) must respond by negative
229
230
BEHAVLOR
23 1
232
that schooling behavior of Bufo woodhousii and Xenopus l m ? than individuals in the early detection and avoidance of
tadpoles is similar to that of fish. In the absence of other predators (O'Hara 1981). Theoretical, observationd, and
cues, both Bufo and Xenupus larvae exhibited two features experimental evidence suggest that as prey group-size inof fish schools -oriented paraliel to and showed preferential creases early predator deteaion and probability of escape inbearing to their nearest neighbors. In spite of these similari- creases (e.g., S. J. Arnold and Wassersug 1978; Hamilton
ties, most tadpole schools do not exhibit the mobiiity dis- 1971; Kenward 1978; G. V. N. Powell1974; P d i a m 1973;
played by fish schools. Compared to those of fish, rnost tad- Siegfried and Underhill 1975; R. J. Taylor 1976, 1979;
pole schools are relatively stationary and individuals in Treisman 1975; Vine 1973). Tadpole groups rnay efficiently
schools are usualiy at random distantes fi-om their nearest swamp potential competitors. O'Hara (1981) and Olson
neighbors. A preferred distance to neighbors displayed by (1988) occasionaliy observed aggregations of western toad
fish is rarely observed in tadpole schools (Wassersug et al. (Bufo boreas) tadpoles displacing s m d groups of Pacific tree1981b). The mobile schooling behavior of Hylageographh frog (Pseuducris r@Lla) tadpoles. Intraspecific competition
is an exception to the generalization that tadpole schools are rnay be mediated by aggressive behavior between individual
relatively stationary (Caldwei 1989); the same is true for tadpoles; apparent aggressive "butting" has been observed
schools of Rhznophynus donalis (Stuart 1961; R. W. McDi- in Bufo americanus tadpoles (Beiswenger 1975; D.C. Smith
armid, personal observation). Tadpoles of certain species, 1990 and referentes therein; Waldman 1982a).
Groups of tadpoles rnay thermoregulate more efficiently
such as Phyllomedusa vaillanti, rnay be evenly spaced when
schooiing in midwater (Branch 1983; J. P. Caldwell, per- than individuals. An aggregation of black tadpoles rnay
sonal cornmunication). Bufo and Xnupus tadpoles differ in efficiently absorb solar radiation that raises the temperature
some aspects of their schooiing behavior. The bearing rela- of the surrounding water (Caldwei 1989; Guilford 1988;
tionship of one individual changed with iiiumination inXen- Wassersug 1973).O'Hara (1981) repeatedly found temperaopus but not in Bufo. Aithough Bufo tadpoles in schools seem ture differentials of 2-3C inside and outside of B. boreas agto be generaliy weakly polarized (Breden et ai. 1982), they gregations; he ascribed these to solar heat absorption and
polarize more extensively in the field than in the laboratory possibly metaboiic activity. Aiso, tadpoles rnay accrue inclusive fitness by associating with related individuals. The con(Wassersug et ai. 1981b)
L i e some fishes (e.g., Radakov 1973), tadpoles in cept of inclusive fitness (Hamilton 1964a, b, c) predicts, ali
schools rnay orient toward individuals of similar sizes (e.g., else being equal, that individuals wiii cooperate with or aid
Alford and Crump 1982; Branch 1983; Breden et al. 1982). related individuals over unrelated individuals. Aithough
The magnitude of and the factors involved in size sorting not required, Hamilton suggested that an ability to discrimivaries arnong species. Phyllomedusa vaillanti larvae in Brazil nate between kin and nonkin (= km recognition) couid fa(Branch 1983) formed temporary schools of rnixed size cilitate this so-calied kin selection (Maynard Smith 1964)
classes that eventualiy segregated into schools cornposed of process.
different size classes. Unequal locomotor capabilities of size
classes, social attraction of like-sized individuals, and prefer- &n Rewpitwn and &n Association
ences for specific water depths rnay contribute to sorting by Tadpoles of many species are socialiy attracted toward and
size in these schools (Branch 1983).Ranasphenocephala tad- form schools with conspecifics in nature, and tadpoles in
poles of different size classes rnay iive in different habitats, schools rnay orient toward individuals of similar sizes. Aiso,
and both interferente and exploitative competition rnay based on numerous laboratory. experiments that controlled
contribute to intraspecific size sorting (Alford and Crump for body size, tadpoles of several species seemingly prefer to
1982). S m d R. sphenocephala tadpoles rnay be displaced by associate with relatives over unrelated individuals regardlarge ones. Aithough Bufo woodhousii larvae seem to associate less of body size (A. R. Blaustein 1988; A. R. Blaustein
with individuals of the same size, the magnitude of size sort- et al. 1987a; A. R. Blaustein and Waldman 1992; Waldman
ing is sma (Breden et al. 1982). Both large and sma indi- 1991; also see Cornell et al. 1989; Dawson 1982; O'Hara
and Blaustein 1985; Waldman 1982a, 1986a). It seems
vidual~rnay be found near one another.
Group living has numerous benefits, including the possi- iikely, therefore, that tadpole schools of certain species are
bhty of avoiding, detecting, and deterring predators, en- composed primarily of related individuals.
Investigators have used variations of two basic rnethods,
hancing foraging efficiency, accming benefits in competitive
interactions, and increasing the efficiency of thermoreg- laboratory choice tests or laboratory open-field tests, to deulation (Aiexander 1974; Bertram 1978; Hamilton 1971; termine Ghether or not a tad~oiec k discriminate between
o i cof
e tadpoles of the
Pitcher 1986; Pulliam and Caraco 1984; G. C. Williams kin and nonkin. ~ ~ ~ r e ~ a t i o n c htests
1964). Tadpoles that form aggregations rnay gain many of western toad (Bufo boreas), Pacific treefrog (PseudacrW rethese benefits (A. R. Blaustein 1988; Brodie and For- gilla), and the red-legged (R. aurma), Cascades (Rana casmanowicz 1987; O'Hara 1981; Waldman 1982a; Wassersug cadae), and spotted (R.prehosa) fi-ogs have been conducted
1973). For example, stirring of the substrate by groups of in the laboratory (review by A. R. Blaustein 1988; A. R.
toad tadpoles results in suspending food that larvae can filter Blaustein and Waldman 1992; A. R. Blaustein and W d s
from the water (e.g., Beiswenger 1972, 1975; Wdbur 1995) after test animals were reared in one of four regimes
197%). Tadpoles that form groups couid be more efficient (summarized in A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1986a): (1) km
BEHAVIOR
233
oniy, (2) kin and nonkin (mixed-rearing regime), (3) in colors, equai numbers of the two groups were placed in a
isolation from an early embryonic stage, and (4) nonlun laboratory pool simuitaneously, and the distantes from each
oniy. Association preferences were measured by allowing tadpole to its nearest s i b h g and nearest nonsibling were retest individuais to associate near members of two stimuius corded. Waidman (1985a, 1986a) also used choice tests in a
groups within a rectangular tank (A. R. Blaustein and Y-maze to assess iun recognition in B. americanus tadpoles.
O'Hara 1986a). Stimuius compartments that were separated In some of these tests, tadpoles were simultaneously prefiom the main portion of the tank by a screen were placed sented with water flowing from m o containers, each holdon opposite ends of the tank, and various numbers of tad- ing members of Merent s i b h g groups. In other tests, tadpoles that varied in genetic affinities were placed in each poles were simuitaneously presented with water flowing
compartment. In most tests, the time out of 20 min that from a container holding siblings and one holding dechloritadkles spent in the h& nearest one stimuius group was nated tap water. Dawson (1982) used both choice tests and
compared with the time that wouid be expected if associa- open-field tests to investigate lun recognition in B. ameritions were random. In other experiments, the time that tad- canus tadpoles. Like in experiments of Corneil et ai. (1989),
~ o l e sDent
s
in the thrd of the tank closest to one stimuius the test apparatus used by Dawson was much smaller than
group, the third closest to the other stimuius group, or the the one used by A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara. The methods
time spent in the middie third of the tank was compared and rearing regimes used by Dawson (1982) differed somenlth a random expectation. Resuits obtained by A. R. what fiom those used by A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara and
Blaustein and O'Hara are difficuit to compare directly with Waldman, so again direct comparisons are difficult.
similar tests of iun recognition done by Cornell et ai. (1989,
Significant Merences in how tadpoles discriminated beR. ylvaticu) and Fishwild et ai. (1990, Pseudmris mcifer, R tween kin and nonlun exist among species (table 9.1), and
pipns, and R. ylvatica) because rearing and testing proto- the different methods used by the various investigators cancols were different.
not fuiiy explain the observed differences. DifTerences in disWaldman (1981,1984,1985b) and Waidman and Adier crimination between species were apparent even when iden(1979) conducted open-field laboratory experiments to test ticai rearing and testing regimes were used. For example, the
kin recognition in B. americanus and R. sylvatica tadpoles three ranids tested and reared identically by A. R. Blaustein
(alsosee Rautio et ai. 1991).After being reared under a vari- and his coiieagues displayed signhcant differences in how
ety of regimes, members of two sibships were dyed different they discrirninated between iun and nonkin (table 9.1).
Table 9.1 A summary of the results of kin recognition experiments involving various anuran tadpoles.
ENC = experiment not conducted.
Species
Bufonidae
Bu@ americanus
B. bweas
Hylidae
Pseuhris mtcijr
l?r@ih
Ranidae
Rana aurora
R. cuscadae
R. pipieru
Discriminates
Siblings Frorn
Nonsiblings
Identifies
Half-Siblings
Yess
Yes
Yesh
Yesc
No
No
ENC
ENC
ENC
Yesd
No
ENC
No
Yes
ENC
Yes'
234
Rana cascadae discriminated between kin and nonkin after exert a stronger influence than paternal cues. Rana c a s c h
being reared under a variety of regimes. Rana aurora tad- tadpoles showed a positive attraction to kin rather than a
poles discriminated oniy between kin and nonkin in early repuision to nonkin (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1987).
larva1 stages and oniy after rearing with fuli siblings. Rana
Waldman (1984) conduaed open-field laboratory tests
pretiosa tadpoles failed to discriminate between kin and non- of Rana sylvatica tadpoles that had been reared with sibhgs
kin regardless of how they were reared (A. R. Blaustein or in mixed-rearing regimes. Tadpoles reared oniy with sib1988). Sidarly, R. sylvatica tested by Fishwild et al. (1990) lings displayed a smaiier, mean nearest-neighbor distance to
discriminated between kin and nonkin whereas Pseudami3 siblings than to nonsiblings. The importante of famiiiarity is
cmcifer and R. pipiens, tested and reared identicaiiy to R. 8- dificuit to interpret from these experiments. Mixed-reared
vatica, did not. Using choice tests and a laboratory apparatw tadpoles distinguished between f a d a r siblings and familiar
slightiy modhed from that used by O'Hara and Blaustein nonsiblings, but individuais reared in mixed regimes had
(1981), J. A. Haii et ai. (1995) investigated the ability of closer contaa with siblings than nonsiblings; this couid have
Spea intemntana tadpoles to discriminate between kin and influenced their preferences (Waldman 1984). The tadpoles
diet-based (= environmental) cues in forming associations. showed a tendency to associate more closely with familiar
They found no evidence of kin-based associations for indi- siblings than with unfimdiar sibhgs. Corneli et al. (1989)
viduais raised on the same diet, and mixed resuits between showed that R. sylvatica did not discriminate between familkin and nonkin groups raised on different diets. They con- iar and unfamiliar siblinzs but did discriminate between uncluded that if kin discrimination occurs, environmentallly familiar paternal half-sivblings and unfamiliar nonsiblings.
derived cues rnay be the basis for such discrimination and These resuits suggest that neither maternal cues nor prior
that those cues rnay be external to the natal environment of association with individuals are necessary for recognition in
R. sylaatica tadpoles.
the tadpoles.
Rana c m c h and R. sylaatica seem to have the most acute
The discrimination system ofRana aurora tadpoles differs
kin recognition abiiities. The rearing regime had little i d u - significantiy from those iiiustrated by R. c a s c h and R. sylence on the discrimination abiiities of R. c a s c h tadpoles. vatica. Oniy those R. aurora tadpoles reared with siblings
Results of testing mixed-reared tadpoles show that individu- and tested in early developmental stages associated with kin
als preferred to associate with unfamiliar sibluigs over un- (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1986b; A. R. Blaustein et al.
familiar nonsibhgs (O'Hara and Blaustein 1981).They also 1993). Ths tendency disappeared as tadpoles developed.
preferred to be nearest an unfamiliar stimulus group comThe larvae of Bufo americanus and B. boreas showed both
posed of sibhgs oniy, over a familiar group containing 50% sidarities and differences to each other and to the ranids.
siblings and 50% nonsiblings (O'Hara and Blaustein 1981). The ontogeny ofB. boreas kin recognition was influenced by
Also, tadpoles reared in isolation subsequentiy associated the rearing regime; tadpoles reared with kin preferentidy
preferentidy nearest unfamiiiar siblings over unfamiliar associated with kin over nonkin in laboratory choice tests
nonsibhgs (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1981, 1982). (O'Hara and Blaustein 1982).
,, but individuais reared in
These resuits suggest that familiarity with other individuals mixed-rearing regimes and with nonkm oniy displayed ranis not required for kin recognition, but siblings reared in dom association with respea to siblings and nonsiblings.
mixed-rearing regimes failed to discriminate between famil- Even when preferences for siblings were fuiiy established
iar sibiings and familiar nonsiblings. Tadpoles reared with after prolonged rearing with siblings, short-term exposure
siblings could assess the relative composition of sibling to nonsiblings nulliied these preferences (O'Hara and Blaugroups to some degree; individuais discriminated between a stein 1982).
stimulus group composed of 50% kin and 50% nonkm and
The use of methods and sample sizes identical to those
one containing 100% nonsiblings by preferring to associate used by A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara (1982a, Rana cas&)
nearest the former group (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara in their investigation of half-sibling recognition in Bufi bmem tadpoles (A. R. Blaustein et ai. 1990) makes comparisons
1983).
Embryos rnay respond to cues that emanate from the jeliy between these studies especiaiiy meaningii. Bufo bmem tadderived from the mother's oviduct (A. R. Blaustein and poles preferentiaiiy associated with fuii siblings over paternal
tad- half-siblings and with maternal half-siblings over nonsiblings
O'Hara 1982a; Waldman 1981).Tests ofRana cas&
poles that were reared after the jeiiy had been removed or (A. R. Blaustein et al. 1990). They did not discriminate beafter the jeliy had been removed and replaced with jeliy from tween fuii siblings and maternal half-siblings or between paa nonkin egg mass indicate that tadpoles were unaffeaed by ternal half-siblings over nonsiblings. These results suggest
these manipulations (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1982a). that a maternal component is necessary for discrimination,
Rana c a s c h tadpoles preferred to associate with fuii sib- which contrasts with the data onRana cascadae and R. sylvatlings over either maternal or paternal half-siblings and with ica tadpoles. Unlike R. cmcadae tadpoles, Bufo boreas tadpoles
half-siblings (either maternal or paternal) over nonsiblings did not discriminate between maternal and Ioaternal half(A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1982a). Because fuli siblings siblings. The role of maternal cues in B. borem kin recogniwere chosen over maternal half-siblings, and paternal half- tion rnay be relatively complex (see A. R. Blaustein et al.
siblings were chosen over nonsibhgs, maternal cues are not 1990).
Bufo americanus tadpoles reared oniy with siblings or in
necessary for kin recognition. Because maternal half-sibhgs
were chosen over paternal half-siblings, maternal cues may isolation associated significantly nearer their siblings than
BEHAVIOR
235
nonsibiings (Waldman 1981; Waidman and Adler 1979). the laboratory rnay not have been motivated to display disTadpoles reared with sibiings in early development and then crimination behavior (A. R. Blaustein et ai. 198%) iun recexposed to siblings and nonsiblings in later development re- ognition rnay be m k e s t e d differentiy in differeit' popuiatained their dose association with sibhgs. However, tad- tions, rnay be a polyrnorphic trait within popuiations (A. R
poles that were reared with both siblings and nonsibiings Blaustein 1988; A. R. Blaustein et ai. 1987b), and rnay
in early development and exposed to sibhgs only in later change ontogeneticaiiy (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1986b).
development did not preferentiaiiy associate with familiar
Studies of Bufo americanus (Dawson 1982; Waidman
sibiings over familiar nonsiblings (Waidman 1981). This 1985a), B. borem, Rana aurora (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara,
suggests the possibility of a sensitive period in early develop- unpubiished data) and Rana mcadae (A. R. Blaustein and
ment during which B. americanus tadpoles familiarize them- O'Hara 1982b) illustrate that h recognition in tadpoles is
selves with other individuais (Waldman 1981). Maternal mediated by water-borne chemical cues. Kin recognition
cues seem to be important in B. americanus h recognition persists after metamorphosis in at least R. cmcadue (A. R.
because maternal haif-sibhgs were not distinguished from Blaustein et ai. 1984) and R. sylvatica (Cornell et ai. 1989;
fii sibhgs, yet paternal h*-siblings were distinguished Waidman 1989); and based on the experimental regimes
from fii sibhgs (Waldman 1981).
used, it does not seem as if water-bome chemical cues were
In laborato6 Y-maze experiments, Bufo americanus tad- used by metamorphs to discriminate between sibiings and
poles preferred unfamiiiar sibhgs rather than familiar non- nonsiblings.
siblings (Waldman 1986a). These data provide further eviPfennig (1990b) suggested that kin association in spadedenc;thit familiaritv is not the sole basi; for h recoenition
foot toad tadvoles resuited from habitat selection based on
"
in B. americanus. In other Y-maze tests, tadpoles chose water diet-based environmental cues rather than from social preferl a c h g conspecific chemical cues over water containing non- ences. Tadpoles with similar diets aggregate in the laborasiblings (Waldman 1985a). Thus, avoidance of nonsiblings, tory. In nature, because of the spatial and temporal proximrather than attraction to siblings, codd be the basis for kin ity of siblings within a pond, individuals eating similar foods
association in B. americanus tadpoles. Tests of B. americanus are more inciined to be related and therefore rnay form agkin recognition (Dawson 1982) showed that tadpoles gener- gregations. Work by Pfennig impiies that "hrecognition"
aiiy associated with siblings over nonsibhgs in choice tests behavior and lun association in tadpoles of some species rnay
but f d e d to do so in open-field tests.
be an artifact of habitat selection (also see arguments by J. A.
Resuits of laboratory h recognition tests of similar Hail et al. 1995). O'Hara and Blaustein (1982) posed a simimethodologies with tadpoles of Bufo americanus (Waldman lar argument concerning habitat selection for kin association
1982a) and Rana cmcadue (O'Hara and Blaustein 1985) in B u . tadpoles, and Grafen (1990) suggested that aii cases
have been corroborated in field experiments. Larvae of R. of vertebrate kin recognition can be more consistentiy excmcadae from six popuiations were reared in pure sibiing plained as species recognition. A. R. Blaustein et al. (1990)
groups or in mixed-rearing regimes. Equal nurnbers of tad- addressed this point in detail; and for some species of anuran
peles fiom two unrelated sibships were dyed diierent colors larvae, the proposal by Grafen (1990) rnay be correct (A. R
and released together in ponds they naturaiiy inhabit. For Blaustein et al. 1990).
several days, single aggregations were censused for sibship
A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara (1986b) suggested at least
composition. Aggregations consisted of tadpoles primarily two important parameters associated with the tendency for
from one of the two color groups (controls revealed that a tadpole to display kin recognition behavior: dispersal charcolor did not d e c t aggregation behavior). Tadpoles raised acteristics and aggregation behavior. These parameters relate
in pure sibiing and in mixed-rearing regimes associated in to the probabhty of whether a tadpole wiii have the opporgroups composed principaiiy of sibiings. Unhke the case of tunity in nature to interact with h . Species whose larvae
laboratory tests, familiar sibiings were distinguished from fa- randomly disperse (see Augert and Joly 1994) from their
miliar nonsibhgs.
oviposition sites wouid have a relatively low probability of
Resuits of 6eld exveriments on Bufo americanus tad- interacting with relatives; A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara
poles generdy corrobo>ate the laborato& resuits (Waldman (1986b) predicted that larvae of such species wouid not ex1982a). As with Rana m&, B. americanus tadpoles couid hibit kin-selected behaviors. Similarly, in species whose lardiscriminate between f a d a r siblinns and familiar nonsib- vae do not sociaily interact (form coheske aggregations)
iings in the field, but they couid notudo so in the laboratory with conspecifics, h-selected behaviors rnay have iittle op(Waldman 1982a). These data suggest that field experiments portunity to evolve.
In nature, the patterns of aggregation formation and disprobably are a more sensitive measure of kin recognition
persal characteristics M e r among the anuran larvae tested
than are laboratory experiments (A. R Blaustein 1988).
Two ranids (Fishwild et al. 1990, Rana pipkns; O'Hara for kin recognition. Bufo americanus, B. borem, and Rana cmand Blaustein 1988, R. pretwsa) and two hylids (Fishwild cadae form persistent, compact, social aggregations (A. R.
et al. 1990, Pseudacris mci$er; O'Hara and Blaustein 1988, Blaustein 1988). Rana cascadue aggregations are smaii and
P s e u h s regilu) f d e d to discriminate between kin and usuaiiy composed of a number (less than 100) much smaiier
nonkin in laboratory choice tests. These resuits do not ne- than the clutch size (A. R. Blaustein 1988). Rana sylaatua
gate the possibility that these species rnay discriminate kin tadpoles rnay aggregate similarly in certain ponds but not
from nonkin under different conditions. Tadpoles tested in in others (DeBenedictis 1974; Hassinger 1972; Waldman
" ,
236
1984), and their aggregations are usudy composed of hundreds of thousands of individuals from numerous sibships
(Waidman 1984). Although little is known about the larvai
ecology of Rana aurora, there is evidence that intermittent,
temporary, aggregations rnay form in early larval stages
(A. R. Blaustein, unpublished data; Caief 1973). Ranapretiosa aggregations probably form only sporadicdy (C. C. Carpenter 1953; R. K. O'Hara and Blaustein, unpublished
data). Pseudacris regilha tadpoles occasiondy form s m d ,
loose, aggregations (O'Hara 1981); tadpoles of Pseuducris
crtlcijir and Ranapipzens are not known to aggregate (Fishwild et ai. 1990). Bufo aggregations are generdy much
larger than aggregations of Rana tadpoles, are often extremely dense (O'Hara and Blaustein 1982; Waldrnan
1982a; Wassersug 1973), and rnay be composed of hundreds of thousands of individuals from numerous sibships.
S m d group size and low dispersal from sites of oviposition make it likely that aggregations of Rana cas&
tadpoles are composed primarily of h.Because of these behaviors, R. cascadae tadpoles appear to have sufficient opportunity to interact with siblings and display a kin recognition system that would be efficient in their natural habitats
(A. R. Blaustein et ai. 1987%; O'Hara 1981; O'Hara and
Blaustein 1985). Potential exists for mixing with nonsiblings, especidy because egg masses may be laid commundy
(A. R. Blaustein 1988; O'Hara and Blaustein 1981). If there
are benefits to aggregating with kin, tadpoles of R. cascadae
must be able to discriminate benveen siblings and nonsiblings; rhis abiiity must be resistant to modification after exposure to nonsiblings. Laboratory and field experiments
indicate that the kin recognition system of R. cas&
is established early in development and is generdy not altered
by exposure to n o n h (A. R. Blaustein and O'Hara 1981,
1982a, b, 1983; O'Hara and Blaustein 1981, 1985). In certain ponds Rana sylvatica tadpoles rnay disperse rapidly and
far from sites of oviposition, whereas in other ponds dispersai rnay be moreAlimitedand tadpoles mayavoid one
another (DeBenedictis 1974; Hassinger 1972; Waidman
1984).
In ponds where the tadpoles aggregate, there is some opportunity for the formation of kin groups. At times, large,
single, polarized, schools break up into smder, feeding
groups of severai hundred to severai thousand individuals
(Waidman 1984). Althoueh most schools of the tad~olesof
R. sylvatica conskt of in&iduals from many sibshiis, these
smder units rnay represent sibling groups (Waldman 1984).
Rana syloatica tadpoles display a kin recognition system that
generdy is not influenced by exposure to nonsiblings. As
in R. cas&,
a system that is resistant to modification after exDosure to nonsiblin~swould be reauired because of
comrnunai egg laying and exposure to nonlun during larval
stages (Waidman 1982b, 1984).
Dispersal from sites of oviposition in both Bufo americanus &d B. boreas tadpoles is Ggh and members of different
sibships intermingle (Beiswenger 1972; O'Hara 1981;
O'Hara and Blaustein 1982; Waidman 1982b). The kin recognition system of B. americanus is generdy consistent with
I
its larvai ecology and behavior. Large aggregations rnay subdivide into smder schools (Beiswenger 1972, 1975; Waidman 1982a) that rnay represent sibling cohorts (Waidman
1982a). MWng with nonsiblings is frequent in active larvae
(Beiswenger 1972; Waldman 1982a), and sibling preferences, once established, are resistant to modifications (Waidman 1981). The larvai behavior of B. boreas tadpoles may
preclude kin association; extremely large aggregations form
from individuals from numerous clutches, and the feeding
behavior of the individuals in aggregation entails frequent
moving, intermingling, and splitting o E The formation of
discrete kin associations rnay be difficult even if such behavior conferred fitness benefits (O'Hara and Blaustein 1982).
Maintaining cohesive sibling groups would be difficult even
if tadpoles retained a capability to recognize siblings after
encounters with nonsibiings. As in B. americanus, smder
schools split off from the main aggregation, and these rnay
be sibiing cohorts.
The failure of Pseuducrir crtlcijir, E rgilla, Rana pipiens,
and R. pretwsa to discriminate benveen h and nonkm is
genera& consistent with their larvai ecology (discussed by
A. R. Blaustein 1988). Because these species either do not
aggregate or form aggregations only interrnittently, there is
lide opportunity for siblings to interact. Too lide is known
about the larvai ecology of R. aurora to speculate whether
there is opportunity for kin to interact (A. R. Blaustein and
O'Hara 1986b). These larvae are the onlv ones known to
have a kin recognition system that changes ontogeneticdy.
Ir is not necessary for a tadpole to aggregate with kin to
gain the benefits of group living, but those individuals that
preferentidy associate with kin rnay accrue additional benefits through an increase in inclusive fitness (Aiexander 1974;
Hamilton 1964a, b). Kin recognition potentiay enhances
.
is
the formation of and maintenkce of kin e r o u ~ i which
important if there are benefits to associati& w i x h.Tadpoles living in groups composed primarily of kin could warn
relatives if they release an aiarm substance when they are attacked (Hews and Blaustein 1985; Hrbek 1950; Waidman
1986b). This is a more likely benefit of kin association in
R. cas&
tad~oles(Hews and Blaustein 1985). Iniured
R. cas&
tadpoles release a chemical cue that causes others
to elicit an escapelike response (Hews and Blaustein 1985).
In t h s situation, kin would be warned because individuals
in R. cascadae aggregations are presumably mostly kin, and
kin recognition may be maintained by kin selection. Unpaiatabiiity and noxiousness are probably important antipredator adaptations in some species of tadpoles (Brodie et ai.
1978; Formanowicz and Brodie 1982; Wassersug 1973;
Werschkul and Christensen 1977). The evolution of distasteh e s s or aposematic coloration has often been explained by
a kin selection model (e.g., Benson 1971; Fisher 1930; Harvey and Greenwood 1978).If members of a single kin group
aggregate with each other and a predator that sarnples one
or more distastefd sibhes learns to avoid others in the
group, then a gene for distastehess could increase in
frequency through kin selection. This scenario has been
invoked to explain the advantage of associating with kin
I
BEHAVIOR
238
BEHAVIOR
239
Summary
Aithough there is much that is not known about the mechanicai aspects of the behavior of anuran larvae, the mdiments of behaviors associated with feeding, respiration,
thermoregulation, and locomotion are understood and documented. The same cannot be said of the social behavior of
these animals. Empirical investigations suggest that there is
as much or more variety in the details of social behavior as
there is in any aspect of tadpole behavior. Aithough the ecological context of some behaviors, such as preferential km
association, is understood for some species, the understanding of general patterns must await more experimentation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Kate Spencer, whose artistic skds are considerable, designed
and produced the two drawings for this chapter; we greatly
appreciate her willingness to work with us. Karl-Heinz Jungfer loaned siides and provided information on the tadpoles
of Anotheca spinosa (fig. 9.3A), Osteocephalus oophagus (fig.
9.3B), and Mgophys mntana (fig. 9.5A). Mark-Oliver Rode1 and Karsten Grabow shared their knowledge of Hemisus
mamratus biology with us and K. Grabow l o k e d the slide
reproduced in figure 9.3C. Jonathan A. Campbel loaned the
slide of Petropedetesparkeri shown in figure 9.5. To each of
these colleages weexpress our thanks.
ECOLOGY
Resource Use, Competition,
and Predation
Ross A. M o r d
Introduction
As noted in the quote above, R. M. Savage (1962) recognized that the ecology of tadpoles is a cornplex and variable
reflection of rnost of the processes that govern the dynamics
of populations and cornrnunities. During the 1960s and
1970s severai pioneering studies took advantage of this idea
by using larval amphbians as rnodels for examining ecologicai and evolutionary processes (see fig. 10.1). Continuation
of this trend into the 1980s and 1990s led to a rapid expansion of the tadpole iiterature. Anuran larvae were used in
studies ranging from the genetics of growth (aiso see Rist et
ai. 1997) and development to the organization of complex
communities and ecosysterns. Sede's (1987) synthesis of
the literature on amphbian energetics is appiicable to various subjects below, and Wibur (1980) summarized the state
of tadpole ecology at the start of the 1980s. In this chapter,
I provide a similar summary, and point out new areas of
inquiry that have arisen from work done primarily since
1979.
Ali staging notations are from the systern of Gosner
(1960; aiso see table 2.1).
General Features
ECOLOGY
Primary
faciors
changes preclude the estabiishment of stable ciimax cornmunities and may fachtate invasion by transient organisms such
as anuran larvae.
EcOh~iicd.L
Interaccions
It is iikely that the interaction of biotic and abiotic factors
influentes tadpole ecology (Dunson and Travis 1991; fig.
10.1). During their lives, tadpoles of most anuran species
Components
Reproduction -4
Mate selection
Site seledion
Physical
Secondary
faciors
Population structure
Phenology
241
Site history
Habitat and
microhabitatselection
Long-term climatic history
Reeent weather history
Water movemenis
pHlnutrienislcontaminants
Dissolved O,
Desiccation risk
Interspecific competition
Survival
Biotic
Intraspecific competition
Interspecific predation
Antipredator behavior
Phenotypic plasticity
Intraspecific predation
Diseaselparasites
Historicallpriority effects
Microhabitat selection
(U
2
m
Temperature fluduations
Development
Fig. 10.1. Summary of factors affeaing the ecology of adults, eggs, and hatchlings (combined because of similar processes), and tadpoles of anuran amphibians. Four major processes control transitions through and
between life history stages, and these processes are iduenced by primary factors in or of the biotic environment. While secondaq factors are reflected primarily in the reproductive ecology and behablor of adults, they
can affect direcdy the biotic environment of a larva (e.g., microhabitat selection).Arrows indicate interactions
and their directions, which need not be directly causal. For example, developmentai differences are larva1
responses to components of the environment and iduence the duration of larvai period and thus the degree
and type of exposure to the physicai environment.
242
R O S S A. A L F O R D
increase in mass by factors of 50 or more, They may experience local densities of several hundred inhviduals/m2 or
25+/liter (table 10.1). Most of the habitats occupied by tadpoles are used by more than one species and contain herbivores of a variety of other taxa, many of which may compete
with tadpoles (Morin ct al. 1988). Most also contain predators (Cooke 1974; C. L. Rowe et al. 1994), and the roles
of predator and competitor may switch through time (L.
Blaustein and Kotler 1993; L. Blaustein and Margaht 1994;
Hearnden 1992; Petranka et al. 1998). The phenology and
reproductive site preferences of adult &ogs control the exposure of tadpoles to con~petitorsand predators.
The general type of reproductive habitat chosen (temporary or permanent water, surroundrng habitat type) has a
strong influence on the entire developmental strategy followed by many species. Reproduction in permanent water
decreases the risk of drying before development is complete,
generally increases the diversity of competitors and prcdators prescnt, and decreases the availability of food. Species
spawning in permanent water tend to have prolonged larval
periods and metamorphose at sizes larger than temporarypond spawners (Patterson and McLachlan 1989). In part
this may be influenced by adult reproductive parameters;
egg size and clutch size can depend on the type of reproductive habitat used by a species (Tejedo and Reques 1994a).
Woodward (1987a) found that species breeding in tempo-
Table 10.1 The mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum numbers (listed in order vertically) of tadpoles per liter and tadpoles per
square meter in field samples from a temporary pond in northern Florida in 1981.Number of samples and pond area (mZ)are given below each
date. Expanded from Mord 1986b.
-.
1 March
7
1400
Liter
m2
8 Mar&
12
1470
liter
m2
23 march
6
612
liter
m2
5 April
11
264
liter
13 April
10
80
m2
liter
m2
17 April
10
50
liter
ma
19 April
12
20
liter
m2
ECOLOGY
243
244
ROSS A. ALFORD
ECOLOGY
TREATMENT
Fig. 10.2. Growth of tadpoles ofRanu clantitans reared (see x-axis) at nvo densities, two food levels, and two
degrees of food dispersion. Treatments are 2 or 8 individuals per container, high (H) or low (L) food level,
and concentrated (C) or dispersed (D) food. Vertical bars = 95% confidencc limjts of the means. Data frorn
Steinwascher (1979a).
most of the species they examined, and they presented no tive efficiencies of 7.8% at 22C to 24.9% at 30C and the
data on the composition of gut contents, so drawing firm fast clearance times ranned
" from 29 to 101 min at 22C.
conclusions from their data is ciiffcult.
Digestive efficiencies may have been higher in t h s study
An alternative approach to understanding the significance than they are in nature because processing of rabbit peiiets
of differences in relative intestine length appeared in Horiu- may rupture ceii walis and expose a greater proportion of
chi and Koshida (1989), Nodzenski et al. (1989), and Yung their contents for easy absorption than wouid be true for
(1904). Horiuchi and Koshida (1989) showed that the in- intact algal ceiis. Dash and Mishra (1989) examined digestestines of Rhacuphoms arboreus tadpoles that were fed plant tive efficiency as part of a study on the growth and rnetamores
~ a d i o l e smay sometimes
material from haiching were about-1.5 times as long o; day phosis of ~ & p e & z tmacu&s.
15 as larvae fed an animal diet. Adding ceilulose to the ani- feed on cryptic items; animais apparently scraping the surmal diet produced longer intestines. Intestines of tadpoles face of macrophytes, for example, may actudiy be feeding
switched from an animal diet to a plant diet partway through on epiphytic diatoms (Kupferberg et al. 1994). Even though
the larval period responded by becoming longer and reach- larval diets and other rearing faaors have been studied by
ing maximum lengths similar to those of tadpoles always fed L. E. Brown and Rosati (1997), Carmona-Osaide et ai.
plant material. This study showed that relative intestine (1996), Cuiiey (1991), Culley et al. (1977), and Cuiiey and
iength can be related to &e proportion of plant material in Sotairidis (1983) in the laboratory and by Castanet and Caethe diet. It also indicates that interspecific comparisons of tano (1995) in the field, dietary requirements and metabolic
tadpoles from field coiiections shouid be made cautiously be- efficiency of tadpoles need further attention.
cause there may be considerable phenotypic plasticity for relA few studie; have used nrowth and develovmental rates
ative intestine length. Nodzenski et al. (1989) examined the of laboratory popuiations to compare the relative vaiue of
development of the viscera of pelobatid tadpoles and found feeds. Li and Lin (1935) raised larval Kalouu borealzs at a
that Merent organs grow at different rates after tadpoles density of l/liter (274/m2).They found that tadpoles fed anihatch; in
thi gut and pancreas experiente gowth mal material (egg yolk and macerated pork) gr& more rapidly and survived at a greater rate than those fed algae or a
spurts shortly after hatching.
Percent assimilation and clearance times were measured hay infusion. Nagai et al. (1971) examined the relative valby Altig and McDearman (1975) for tadpoles of five species ues of severai diets for larval ~ h,f bufo.
o ., Food rnixtures infed rabbit peilets. Mean percent assimilation of organic mat- cluded vegetable material oniy, vegetable and animal mateter for four species ranged from 53.8% to 85.7%. The fifth rial, animal material oniy, and a cannibal diet of ground
species, Rana catesbeiana, showed considerably lower diges- conspecifics. Unfortunately, the cannibal tadpoles were fed
U
ROSS A. ALFORD
246
only one-fifih as much dry weight per day. Tadpoles on the Crump 1992). Three of these are Spea, which develop speanimal and mixed animal/vegetable material ciiets reached ciaiized cannibal morphotypes under appropriate environthe greatest metarnorphic sizes, whle cannibals showed the mental conditions (Pfennig 1990a). Larvae of at least 15
greatest conversion efficiency. This experiment established species eat normal conspecific eggs, whiie m o eat unfertilthat Bufo tadpoles benefit considerably from the addition of ized nutritive eggs provided directly by the mother. At least
animal material to their diet and that cannibaiism or scav- 12 species have unspecialized tadpoles that are known to
enging from dead conspecifics is an efficient feeding mode. consume conspecific tadpoles, and one species consumes
Larval Bufo stomaticus and Hoplobatrachus tberinus respond conspecific metamorphs. At least three species are known to
with optirnal growth rates and size at metamorpliosis on a cannibalize both eggs and smaller conspecific larvae, whde
diet combining animal and vegetable material (Dash and some species (e.g., Heusser 1970b, Rana temporaria) prey
Mahapatro 1990; Hota and Dash 1986; Mohanty and Dash on eggs of both tiieir own and other species.
Interspecific predation among anurans, particularly pre1986), as do larval Xenupus lua+> (L. E. Brown and Rosati
1997). Ahlgren and Bowen (1991) found that rates of sur- dation by tadpoles on the eggs and hatchlings of other spevival and growth of larval Rufn americanas fed on deuitus cies, may prove to be very common. The predators in this
depended on the source and particle size of the material. Pol- situation gain nutrition whle reducing or eliminating polei1 was not a good source of nutrition for larval Pseuddtris tential competition or predation. Hota and Dash (1983) attempted an experiment on competition between B u . melacriseriataferiarum (Britson and Kisseii 1996).
The effect of cannibaiism o11 the growth of larval H y h nostictus and Hoplobatrachus tgerinus, but the experiment
pseudopuma was investigated experirnentaiiy by Crump failed because the Rana larvae consumed many of the Buf
(1990). These oppoministic cannibals and predators of con- in most of their treatments. Tejedo (1991) found that predaspecific and heterospecific eggs and hatchlings in the field tion by larval Pelobates culcripes and Pelodpes punctatus
were raised inciividually in laboratory containers on a 1:l strongly affected rates of embryoriic survival in Bufo calam(dry weight) mixture of ground tadpoles and artificial feed. ita. Magnusson and Hero (1991) tested 14 species of tadThe tadpoles used as food were either H. pseudopuma, Osteo- poles with eggs of 6 species of frogs; every species tested
pilus sepientrionalis, or Scinax stauferi. Tn one-experiment, consumed at least some heterospecific eggs. Crossland and
each H. pseudopuma tadpole was fed 20 mg of one of the Aiford (1998) found that larvae of all six species of Austratypes of food every 2 days, and in the other experiment, the iian frogs they tested attempted to consume eggs of Bufo
quantity of food was adjusted so that each tadpole received marinw when they were available, despite the fact that Bufo
food with equal energy content. Iii both experiments, tad- eggs were highly toxic to them. Crossland (1997) found that
poles given food containing conspecifics reached signi- larval Limnodynastes omatus consumed eggs of all five other
ficantly greater mass at metamorphosis than tadpoles fed species they were tested with, as weii as cannibalizing conheterospecifics. Crump suggested that cannibalism is a par- specific eggs. He also found that the competitive effects of
ticularlv valuable source of animal food for tad~olesand dis- larval Limnodynmes ornams on B. marinus were reduced
cussed the implications of cannibalism for species popula- when B. marinus entered ponds as eggs after L. omatzts. T h s
tion biology and evolution; she pointed out that species that occurred because consumption of Bufo eggs kiiied larval
enzazc in cannibaiism should have mechanisms that reduce L. omatus, reducing their numbers and their competitive
the probability of consuming close relativa.
effeas on Buf. Larval Rana amurensis preyed on eggs and
In experiments with artificial feeds, Steinwascher and hatchlings of Rombina orientalis (R. H . Kaplan 1992). PeTravis (1983'1demonstrated that arowth rates oflarvalRana uanka et ai. (1998) found that larval Rana sylvatica consume
chmitans do not respond to changes in the ratio of protein eggs of the salamander Ambystoma maculatum, which is a
to carbohydrate, whiie larval Hyla chrysoscelis grow much predator on Rana tadpoles. An alternative method for feedbetter at h i"~ ~rotein:carbohvdrate
h
ratios. Test and McCann ing on animal matter is that of Rbacophomsyiridis, which eat
(1976) noted that larval Buf americanus aggregate and their own foam nests after hatching (Tanaka and Nishinara
switch from scraping substrates to ater feeding in response 1987). Foam nests may also serve to protect g g s from canto high concentrations of protozoans and suggested that nibalism or interspecific predation in some species (Downie
protozoans are a higher quality resource than periphyton. In 1990b; Magnusson and Hero 1991; personal observation).
general, the results of these studies suggest that tadpoles
Estimates of the rate of occurrence of oppoministic can&w more rapidly when animal mate&l occurs in their nibalism and cannibal morphotypes are avaiiable for a few
species, but in general iittle is known about the importante
diets.
Many tadpoles may supplement their diets with animal of cannibaiism and carnivory in the diets of generalist tadprotein through predation or scavenging on conspecific and poles. In a review of the evolution of cannibaiism and canniheterospecific eggs and tadpoles (Crump 1983, 1990,1992; bal morphotypes in amphbians, Polis and Myers (1985)
Magnusson and Hero 1991; Tejedo 1991). Crump (1983) concluded that there was little evidence for genetic polymorsuggested that cannibalism rnight be particularly common in phisms and much evidence for switches to cannibaiism in
species that reproduce in ephemeral ponds where it can serve response to environmental cues. Pfennig (1990a) demonas a means of rapidly consoiidating resources in a high- strated that the development of cannibal morphotypes in
aualitv
form. ~ a b a e - o at
f least 30s~eciesare k n o G t o Spea multiplicata is controlled by the avaiiability of animal
I
eat conspecific eggs, tadpoles, or metamorphs (table 10.2; food and (Pfennig 1992b) that diet switches can cause
U
ECOLOGY
Table 10.2 Cannibalism in anuran larvae. Abbreviations: CL = cannibal-morph larvae, E
M = metarnorphs prior to tail resorption, and NE = special nuuitive eggs.
Species
Predator
Anotheca pinosa
Buf buf"
B. marinw
Chacophyspierott+
Dendvobatespumili@
Euphiyctis cyanophiyct&
Hopiobatrachusti&erinw
H y h arboveaa
H. boaw
H.8eo8vaphica3
H. pseudoprrma
H. zetek+
Hymenachirus boettg&
Lechriodusfitcheri
Leptodactylus pentadactylus
L i m n o d w e s ornatup
Litwia rubeUaa
Osteocephdusoopha8us
0.taurinup
Osteopilusbrunneup
0.septenhonali~
P h y h e d w a vaiUantP
Pyxicephalus adpenus
Rana sylvaticaa
R. tempovanaa
Rhinophynw donalis
Scaphiopw holbmokii
Spea bombtf7orrc
S. hammondii
S. multiplicata
eggs, L
larvae,
Prey
Reference
NE, L
L
Jungfer 1995
Nagai et ai. 1971
Hearnden 1992
Polis and Myers 1985
Brust 1993
Polis and Myers 1985
Polis and Myers 1985
Heusser 1970b
Magnusson and Hero 1991
Magnusson and Hero 1991
Crump 1983,1990
Polis and Myers 1985
Polis and Myers 1985
Polis and Myers 1985
Heyer et al. 1975
Crossland 1997
Crossland 1997
Jungfer and Schiesari 1995
Magnusson and Hero 1991
Poiis and Myers 1985
Crump 1986
Magnusson and Hero 1991
Poiis and Myers 1985
Bleakney 1958
Heusser 1970b
Poiis and Myers 1985
Polis and Myers 1985
Poiis and Myers 1985
Polis and Myers 1985
Pfennig 1990a
Ahlgren and Bowen 1991; Plytycz and Klimek 1992; Syuzyarnova and Iranova 1988) and often not very informative.
After examining gut contents of Rana ciumitans before and
during metamorphosis, Jenssen (1967) concluded that the
larvae are unselective continuous flter feeders. The larvae
ceased feeding at stage 42 (forelimb emption) and did not
feed again until tail resorption was complete. Hendricks
(1973) found that 97% of the food items in the gut contents
of Rana pipiens larvae were free-floating forms. By examining the diets of larvai Acris crepitans from two ponds
with differing phytoplankton assemblages, L. M. Johnston
(1991) concluded that the abundance of aigae in tadpole
guts were related to their abundance in the environment and
that tadpoles from the pond with more abundant phytoplankton grew more rapidly. Johnston's data aiso suggest
that A. crepitans are selective feeders; comparisons of proportionai similarity showed that the diets of animais were 25%
and 67% similar to the composition of the aigai assemblage
from the two ponds but were 82% similar to each other.
C. L. Taylor et al. (1995) demonstrated experimentdy that
larvai Rana sphenocephaiu and Bufo woodhousii selected agar
blocks with lower agar concentrations and containing food
with more anirnai material.
Dietary information may suggest ecologicai relationships
among species. The diets of seven species living in Spain
were related to morphology and microhabitat by Diaz-
248
ROSS A. ALFORD
Paniagua (1985, 1989). Proportional similarities (Feinsinger et al. 1981) between pairs of five species varied from
0.4 to 0.7. Relative intestine length varied among species
and was short in detritivores. Relative intestine length generaiiy increased with development to about Gosner 36 and
then remained constant or decreased. Pavignano (1990)
concluded that the diets of larval Hyla arborea and Pelobates
fscus showed large overlaps consistent with a high degree
of competition. Twelve of 16 species in a Bornean rain forest
(Inger 1986) occupied stream microhabitats. Inger divided
these inhabitants into 3 groups based on food particle size:
macrophages-2 species that fed on relatively large particles
(mean size > 0.12 mm) of mostly vascular plant fragments;
mesophages - 3 species that fed primarily on intermediate
sized particles (0.069 mm < mean size < 0.08 mm); rnicrophages -7 species feeding on small particles (mean size <
0.05 mm). He found broad overlaps in types of food eaten
among species within feeding types. Some of this apparent
lack of dietary differentiation is probably because of the low
statistical power of tests caused by a small sample size (maximum N = 3 per species). Inger suggested that much of the
dietarv differentiation he observed was because of ~hvietic
dzerences in feeding behavior, rnicrohabitat preference and
morphology rather than to immediate competitive pressures.
Trenerry (1988) examined the diets of four species of tadpoles from a rain forest stream in northern Queensland, Australia, during wet and dry seasons. The suctorial tadpoles of
Litoria nannotis and Nvctimvstes
, , davi inhabit riffles and other
fast-moving water in the same areas of the creek. Their diets
were 89% similar in the wet season and 85% similar in the
dry season (proportional s d a r i t y index; Feinsinger et al.
1981). The large dietary overlap suggests that they compete
or occupy dZerent rnicrohabitats, and food rnay not be a
limiting resource. Tadpoles of two pool species, Litoriagenimaculata and Mwophyes schevilli, had diets that were 61%
similar in the wet season and 68% in the dry season. The
diets of the pool and riffie species were 65% similar on average.
Parasites and commensals of tad~oleshave not been studied extensively, and this field of research would seem to be
worthwhile in light of the current interest in the declining
and deformed amphibian phenomena. I present only exarnples of citations on the subjea. The numbers, developmental stages, and species of enteric protozoans vary arnong
tadpoles and depend on the developmental stage of the host
(Affa'a 1979, 1983; Affa'a and Amiet 1994; Hegner 1922;
Oku et al. 1979; Schorr et al. 1991; Wessenberg 1978), but
the significance of these presumed commensals to the welfare of the host has not been determined (see Beebee and
Wong 1992a, b). Affa'a and Arniet (1994) presented an engaging sumrnary of the biology of nyctotherans w i t h the
frog fauna of Carneroon. Studies of other parasites include
Desser et al. (1986, myxozoan), Hird et al. (1981, Aeromunas), Nyman (1986,-~eromunas),Papernal and Lainson
(1995, rnicrosporidian), and Poinar (1988, nematodes).
Studies such as Aho (1990) on parasite communities relative
to the ecology and phenology of the tadpoles would be of
I
interest. M. L. Adamson (1981a, b) discussed the epiderniology and seasonal changes in populations of a heiminth in
wild tadpoles, and Goater (1994) and Goater and Vandenbos (1997) discussed the effects of parasites on larval life
history of tadpoles; see Eberhard and Brandt (1995) and
Schrnutzer (1977) for other information on the interactions
of tadpoles and parasites. Thraii (1972) reported that there
were no bacteria in the guts of tadpoles of Rana catesbeiana,
while others (e.g., Battaglini and Boni 1967; R. Altig, personal cornmunication) report numerous bacteria.
Because tadpoles often occur at relatively h g h densities,
usuaiiy have broad diets, and have high rates of ingestion
and clearance, they rnay be the major primary consumers in
some ecosystems, particularly temporary ponds. Tadpole
grazing can strongly alter the standmg crop and species composition of algae. Dickrnan (1968) showed that grazing by
caged Rana aurora tadpoles reduced the standing crop of
filamentous green algae to 1%-2% of levels found in ungrazed controls. This altered the species composition of the
algal community. Lamberti et a. (1992) found that tadpoles
ofrlrcaphw truei (5/m2) could reduce periphyton biomass by
98% and chlorophyll a by 82% in streams in Washington, a
response that was about equal to the total effeas of grazing
by smaii invertebrates. Seale (1980) showed that tadpoles,
feeding primarily by filtration from the water column, significantly altered the distribution of nitrogen from suspended to dissolved compounds. Tadpoles also shifted the
community composition of algae in a pond from blue-green
algae to green algae. Morin et al. (1990) demonstrated that
Hyla andersonii tadpoles reduced the standing crop of periphyton in artificial ponds. In some habitats, tadpoles ma?
alter algal species composition through feeding and by promoting nutrient cycling (Kupferberg 1997a; Osborne and
McLachlan 1985; Weigmann 1982). Tadpoles rnay also
simply decrease algal biomass without affecting species composition (Holomuzki 1998). The feces of tadpoles can have
greater nutritive value than the food the tadpoles ingest
(Steinwascher 1978a). Tadpole feces can form a nearly continuous layer several centimeters deep in a Carolina bay
(Harris et al. 1988) at the end of summer (personal observation). If the tadpole populations observed by Trenerry
(1988) in a northern Queensland creek were processing food
at rates similar to those measured by Altig and McDearman
(1975), in late summer his pool 2 would receive roughiy
1000 g of tadpole feces per day. It seems likely that in some
systems tadpole grazing rnay strongly &ect the composition
of the plant community and that tadpole feces rnay be an
important source of fine particulate organic matter for detritivores of many taxa. This possibility deserves further investigation.
ECOLOGY
249
ROSS A. ALFORD
250
(HATC)
4
GROW
t-
NO
YES
W>b+c
Fig. 10.3. The Wilbur-Coiiins model relating growth and development rates of tadpoles. Abbreviations: b = minimum size for metarnorphosis; c = dzerence between minimum and maximum body size for
metamorphosis; g = si=-specific growth rate below which metamorphosis is initiated, above which metamorphosis is delayed; and W =
body mass. After C o h s (1979).
ECOLOGY
of research by focusing on when in the lama1 period developmental rate loses its ability to adjust to different growth conditions. Thev demonstrated that the stage
" at which fixation
occurs varies among species. Beck (1997) s~unmarizedadaptive explanations that have been proposed to explain this
variation. Although it has also been suggested that this variation may be nonadaptive, to my knowledge no studies have
examined the possibility that it may be explained by simple
functional morphological constraints. That is, ifthe development of the fore1imG constrains the filteriie and food colleaing apparatus in any way, the potential increase in growth
rate achievable if resource levels increase must decrease. Perhaps developmental rates become fixed at or after the point
at which thk trade-off between forelimb size and filierine
a
rate becomes unfavorable for additional growth. This possibility would be fairly easy to examine experimentally.
Crump (1989a) examined whether tadpoles of Hylapseuhums increased their develonmental rates when water level
dicreased. She raised tadpoles' at a single density under constant high water levels, constant low water levels, and decreasing water levels. Tadpoles raised in decreasingwater levels had the shortest larval periods and metamorphosed at
sizes similar to tadpoles raised a t constant low water levels.
Tadpoles raised at constant high water levels were significantly larger at metamorphosis than either of the other
groups and metamorphosed after intermediate larval periods. Tejedo and Reques (1995) showed that Bufb c a h i t a
larvae metamorphosed more rapidly from ponds with
shorter duration-~hesestudies a&in
demonstrated that de"
velopmental rate can respond to ecological deterioration in
the direction predicted by the Wilbur-Collinshypothesis. Although most tadpoles appear to have at least some ability to
respond as predicted by Wilbur and Collins, larval salamanders may not. Beachy (1995) found that developmental rate
of larval Desmopathw ochrophaew did not respond to
changes in growth rate at any point during the larval period.
The Wilbur-Collins model is an abstract model concerned
with suggesting how relative rates of growth and development should be controlled within a population experiencing
a common physical environment. Smith-Gill and Berven
(1979) developed a predictive model for larval period and
size at metamorphosis in populations of Ranapipiens exposed to different thermal regimes. They found that differentiation, as expressed by
along the Taylor/Kollros
staging series (A. C . Taylor and Kollros 1946), was strongly
correlated with size and time. This result might have been
predicted; the Taylor/Kollros staging series was developed
by choosing the morphological benchmarks for each stage
deliberately so that stage increased linearly with time in a
laboratory population of Ranapipiens. Smith-Gill and Bcrven 11979) also found that the relationshiv between size and
developmental stage depended on environmental temperature; developmental rate decreased faster than growth rate
as temperature decreased so that larvae grown at lower temperatures grew more in each stage and metamorphosed at
larger body sizes than those reared at higher temperatures.
Berven et al. (1979) applied these concepts to explain differences between montane and lowland populations o f h
U
251
252
ROSS A. ALFORD
ity rates appeared t o be constant but growth was exponential. Absolute popdation densities ranged from 7/m2 shortly
after hatching t o less than l/m2 nearly 1 year later. Many
invertebrate and vertebrate predators were present. Licht
(1974) measured growth and survival of R. aurora and R.
pretwsa in a temporary pond and a river in British Columbia,
Canada. Differences in percent survival t o hatching, an average of 71% of R.pvetwsa and 92% of R. aurora, were caused
by choice of oviposition sites; R.pretiosa deposited eggs near
the margins of water bodies where they were vulnerable to
desiccation caused by s m d fluctuations in water level. Both
species showed relatively constant mortality rates throughout development. Cumulative survival from egg to metamorph was less than 1% in the pond and about 5% in the
river site. Licht suggested that most tadpole mortality was
caused by predation. When predation is absent, tadpoles can
survive to metamorphosis at high rates. Seigel (1983) estimated that R. sylvatica in a highly ephemeral pond experienced only 37.5% mortality from egg to metamorph.
D. C. Srnith (1983) presented one of the most comprehensive studies of growth and survival of tadpoles under natural conditions. He studied populations of the c h o m frog,
Pseudacvis trzjeriata, which breed in ephemeral rocky pools
on the shorelines of two s m d islands in Lake Superior, just
off the coast of Isle Royale National Park, Michigan. PseudaE1.i~triseriata required ephemeral pools with intermediate
size and duration for development. Larger, more permanent
pools harbor popdations of dragonfly naiads (Anaxjunius)
that eliminate tadpoles from them, while very s m d , ephemerai pools were either scoured out by r a i d d or dried before
tadpoles could metamorphose. Removai of A.junius increased tadpole survivai in large pools. Variation in the persistence of intermediate-size pools caused tadpole survivai
rates to vary from O to 100%. Tadpole densities in these
pools were high (mean initiai density = 0.95lliter) and ofien
increased as tadpoles grew and pool size decreased. There
was strong evidence for effects of density on the growth rates
and size at metamorphosis of tadpoles. Experimentai manipulations of density and food level showed that competition
was occurring.
Schmuck et al. (1994) studied the effects of density on
growth and metamorphic performance as weii as associated
physiologicai responses. Tadpoles of H@emlius viridz@vus
responded to increases in nitrogenous waste from metabolic
processes or evaporation by increases in the ornithine cycle
(increased urea synthesis; also Shoemaker and McClanahan 1973). In contrast, tadpoles of H. mamratus taeniatus
tolerated high arnmonia levels (aiso Candelas and Gomez
1963; Harpur 1968). The deterioration of natal pond conditions also increased the postrnetamorphic responses of H. v.
nitidulus and H. v. ommatostictus.
Newman (1987) conducted a study that used natural
ponds but d o w e d a rigorous anaiysis of patterns. He monitored the growth and survival of Scaphiupus cwchii tadpoles
in 82 ephemerai desert ponds over a 3-year period. In 16
ponds, predation was the major cause of S. couchii mortality,
and desiccation was the major cause of death in 49 ponds;
only eight ponds produced metamorphs. High initial densi-
ties of eggs led to slow growth and mortality through desiccation. Supplementing the available food in high-density
ponds increased individual growth rates, d o w e d some animais to metamorphose, and demonstrated that resources
were in limited supply.
Berven (1990) studied the popdation biology of terrestriai and aquatic stages of Rana sylvatica at two ponds in
Maryland over a 7-year period. Enclosure of the ponds with
drifi fences d o w e d complete censuses of frogs as they arrived at and departed from the ponds. Survivai from egg to
departing metamorph varied from 0.36% to 8.0% (n =
4.5%) at one pond and 0.09% to 1.7% (E = 0.95%) in the
other. There was strong correlational evidence that larval
growth and survival in each pond depended on larval density. Spearman rank correlations for the two ponds were
-0.77 and -0.90 between the proportion surviving to
metamorphosis and number of eggs deposited, -0.77 and
-0.94 between mean snout-ischium length of metamorphs
and number of eggs, and 0.77 and 0.83 between mean larval period and number of eggs. Cohorts developing in years
of high adult reproductive effort survived at lower rates,
reached smder metamorphic sizes, and spent longer in the
aquatic environment than cohorts in years with lower egg
input. Juveniles produced from larger, faster developing larvae were more likely to s w i v e to reproductive age, reproduced earlier, and were larger and more fecund as adults.
Berven suggested that the consistently lower larvai survivai
rates in one pond may have been caused by larger numbers
of predators in the pond that dried less ofien. Larvai density, predation, and pond duration appeared to control the
growth and survivai rates of larvai Bombina variegata at 46
Swiss ponds studied by Barandun and Reyer (1997). Skeiiy
(1996) showed that larvae of Pseudacrij mcifer and l? trism'ata are affected by density, predators, and pond permanente,
while L. Blaustein and Margaiit (1995) demonstrated that
the distribution of larvai BuJ viridis arnong pools was correlated with the availability of iiamentous aigae.
While the studies cited above have I~roduceduseM estimates of growth rate and survivai of tadpoles under natural
conditions, most d o w many possible interpretations of the
observed Datterns. Growth and survivai of tad~oeshave
been studied rigorously in nearly natural systems by two additionai approaches. The first approach is to subdivide natural populations in pens and manipulate factors such as
density and predators. The second approach is to construa
artificial cornmunities in large outdoor ponds or tanks.
Brockelman (1969) placed pens in two ponds to examine
the responses of larvai Bufo americanus to conspecific densiq
food level, and the presence of predators. Larvai period increased and metamorph body size decreased with increasing
density, and the addition of supplemental food reduced but
did not eliminate the effects of increased densitv. In one
pond, his experimental pens were heavily colonized by predators, and low survivai was not related to initiai density. In
the other pond, mortality was lower and strongly related to
density; about 45% s w i v e d to metamorphosis at an initiai
density of 6 7 tadpoles/m2 (= 0.4/liter), and swivai decreased to about 32% at 178 tadpoles/m2 (= 1.18/liter) and
I
ECOLOGY
253
254
ROSS A. ALFORD
Field enclosure experiments offer the benefits of in- Four replicates were destructively sampled on days 5 and 6
creased control but ofien suffer from high variability among of the experiment, and those that remained were destmcrepiicates. The use of artificiay assembled experimental tively sampled on day 30. In ponds with no predators, an
communities is the next leve1 of increased control and de- average of 90% of Hyla tadpoles survived the first 5-6 days
creased realism. Morin (1981, 1986) first used this tech- of the larval period, and 43% survived to day 30. When N.
nique to study tadpole ecology. The artificial ponds used in viridesmns only were present 21% of Hyh survived to day
his studies, like most others who have employed t h s ap- 516, and none survived to day 30. Predation by C. bartonii
proach, are cattle watering tanks that contain about 1,000 foiiowed a different pattern; 78% of Hyla exposed oniy to
iiters of water. Tanks usuav are covered with iids made from crayfish survived to day 516, and 14% survived to day 30.
screening to prevent colonization by aquatic insects and in- When both predators were present, an average of 29% of
sect larvae. In a typical experiment, tanks are fiied with wa- Hyh survived to day 516 and 1% survived to day 30. Despite
ter one to two weeks before hatchling tadpoles are added. their lower density, Hyh tadpoles exposed to either predator
Leaf iitter, supplementary nutrients, and a standardized set or to both together were smaer on day 516 than tadpoles
ofzooplankton and phytoplankton are added sometime after not exposed to predators. Tadpoles survived to day 30 in
the ponds are fiiied. This technique establishes a set of ex- reasonable numbers oniy when predators were absent or C.
tremely similar but totay independent communities that bartonii was the only predator; data (table 1of Fauth 1990)
can be manipuiated by selective additions or removals of indicate that mean tadpole size at day 30 in these treatrnents
larval anurans and other species. The advantages and draw- did not differ significantly. These results can be explained by
backs of this approach to experimental ecology are discussed antipredator behavior by H. chiysoscelis tadpoles. Presence of
by Hairston (1989), R. G. Jaeger and Was (1989), Morin either predator elicited avoidance behavior that reduced the
growth rates of tadpoles in the first days of life. Avoidance
(1989), and Wdbur (1989).
Morin (1986) examined the effects of intraspecific com- behavior elicited by the presence of both predators simuitapetition and predation by the newt Notophthalmw viridescens neously may have reduced mortality caused by either predaon the growth, larval period, and survival of PseudanZs cm- tor more than the avoidance elicited by oniy one species of
cifer tadpoles. Three densities of hatchling tadpoles (31,62, predator. Fauth concluded that the effects of the predators
and 124/m2; 0.1,0.2, and 0.4/liter) were combined with 0, on the growth and survival ofH. chiysosceliswere not additive
2, or 4 addt newts per pond. Oniy newt density dected and that their final effects at the end of the larval period
survival of tadpoles; it deciined from 73% with newts absent couid not be predicted from short-term studies near &e beto 61% and 47% at medium and high newt densities, respec- g i ~ i n of
g the iarvd period.
tively. The growth rate, length of larval period, and mass at
The artificial pond technique aows for controiied experimetamorphosis of tadpoles were primarily controiied by ini- ments under seminaturai conditions but stdl leaves some
tial tadpole density; tadpoles at hgher densities grew more variation uncontroiied. For example, because artificial ponds
slowly and emerged at s m d e r sizes after longer larval peri- are largely self-sustainingsystems, most tadpoles feed on priods. Tadpoles avoided newts by switching from foraging in mary production that occurs in the ponds. Rates of primary
exposed sites to foraging in hidden, benthic sites. This ap- production, and thus of food supply, are likely to difer beparently did not affect their growth rates.
tween ponds given different experimental treatments. AddiArtificial ponds were used by A. H . Roth and Jackson tionay, unbiased intermediate censuses and measurements
(1987) to examine the effects of pond size on survival and are difticult to conduct; artificial ponds present the same
predation rates of larval Hyh cinevea. They established pools sampling problems that arise in natural ponds. It is difficult
of about 0.09, 1.5, and 3 m2 and aowed insects to colonize to foliow individuals, because that wouid require that they
some of them for 3 months. Over the remainder of the vear.
be individudy marked. Fine control of factors like tempera,
they performed 3 experiments in which larval H. cinevea ture and photoperiod is also difficuit. To look in more detail
were stocked at a constant density of 43/m2 (0.43/liter) and at one or a few controiied factors, many studies have been
foiiowed survival of the tadpoles through metamorphosis. conducted under laboratorv conditions.
Most predation occurred in the first week of larval life, and
Early studies of tadpofe popuiations in the laboratory
predation rates increased significantly as pool size increased. usuay were concerned with examining factors controlhg
They suggested that greater predation pressure in large pools growth and differentiation rates from a mechanistic rather
might be one factor causing selection of sma pools as repro- than an ecological perspective. R. M. Savage (1952) obductive sites.
served that large Bufo tadpoles behavioray kept smaer inFauth (1990) manipuiated the occurrence of aduit No- dividual~away from preferred food sources. H e suggested
tophthalmus vindes~nsand the crayiish Cambams bartonii in that this might lead to inhibition of the growth of smaer
375-liter artificial ponds and examined the effects on the individuals. Adolph (1931) showed that growth rates of
growth and development of larvai Hyh chiysos~lisat a den- Ranapipiens and R. sylaatica declined with increasing density
sity of 200 individuals per pond (130/m2; 0.53/liter). The and that the growth rates of tadpoles raised aione decreased
experimental treatments included neither predator present, as the size of the rearing container decreased (see Guyetant
oniy N.viridescens present (two per pond), oniy C. bartonii 1977a, b; Hourdry and Guyetant 1979; Lametschwandtner
present (two per pond), and two predators of each species et ai. 1982: Streb 1967). H e attributed the effects of crowdpresent per pond. Each treatrnent was replicated eight times. ing to "stress," which increased metabolic rate and decreased
ECOLOGY
255
256
ROSS A. ALFORD
posed that inhibitors are chemical compounds that act primarily to inhibit the growth of conspecifics with aiielotoxic
effeas being largely incidental. This interpretation was contradiaed by Licht (1967), who examined the effeas of water
conditioned by Bufo woodbousii and R.pipiens tadpoles on the
growth of many other species. Licht found no evidence for
decreasing effects with increasing phylogenetic distance and
attributed the inhibitorv effects of conditioned water to oarasitic cels shed in the feces of tadpoles.
To summarize, growth inhibition is common in laboratory populations of tadpoles. It can have several causes, including exchange of parasitic organisms and release of chemical compounds. It probably does not occur on a large spatial
scale in natural populations but may be important where
tadpoles are locaiiy dense, in hatchling aggregations, and in
habitats such as smaii pools and larger pools in the final
stages of drying.
Manv recent studies have used tadooles as models of the
operation of intraspecific competition in general. These usuaiiy have concentrated on exploitation competition where
th rate of resource suoolv, i; not sufficient i o meet maximum demand. In exploitation competition, individuals prevent others from using the resource by consuming it rather
than by defending it. Many studies have concentrated on
competition among individuals reared at a variety of densities on identical food suppiies. This varies the rate of food
supply per individual and hence the degree of exploitation
competition. Unfortunately, without controi treatments that
vary density while holding rate of supply per individual constant, such experiments cannot distinguish effects caused by
resource limitation from effects caused by interference. In
general, interference competition, which may be caused by
any of the inhibitory effects just discussed, can increase the
e&s of density observed & such experiments.
Wiibur (1977a) investigated the effeas of density on laboratory populations of larvai Bufi americanus. The variance
of bodv mass arnong
individuals reared in isolation and fed
u
ad libitum increased as they grew. There was no correlation
between the rates of growth and development of individuals.
Other Rufo were raised at densities of 10, 20, 40, 80, 160,
and 320 per 0.08 m2 in 2-liter pans with the same ration of
food supplied to aii densities. Instantaneous mortality rates
were not related to initial density, and larval growth and
development rates deciined with increasing density. This
led to the apparently paradoxical result that despite densityindependent instantaneous mortality rates, the probability of
survival to metamorphosis was strongly correlated to initial
density. At high initial density, low growth and differentiation rates mean that individuals are exposed to equivalent
instantaneous chances of mortality for ionger perids, and
thus a greater proportion of individuals die before metamorphosis. Dash and Hota (1980, Hoplobatracbus therinus) and
A. Sokol (1984, Litoria ewin~z) found similar patterns in
comparable experiments.
In order to separate the effeas of exploitative and interference competition, Wibur (197%) raised larvai Rana sylvatica in the laboratory at 1 , 2 , 4 , and 810.0110 mZ(250-ml
dish) and 1, 2, 4, and 8X then 6X multiples of a ration of
L L
ECOLOGY
257
remained constant. When feedmg rate per individual decreased with increasing density, length at metamorphosis
decreased and larval period increased.
I recently conduged a laboratory experiment designed to
separate the effects of interference and exploitation competition on the growth of larval Limnodymxites ornatus. I raised
tadpoles at densities of 1, 2, and 4 individuals in 10 x 7
cm-circular plastic containers holding 250 rnl of water and
completely crossed these densities with feedmg rates of 1,2,
and 4X multiples of a basic food ration consisting of a 1:3
mixture by weight of finely ground tropical fish flakes and
alfalfa pellets. I weighed d tadpoles in the experiment on
day 10 of development (fig. 10.5).The design of this experiment was similar to that of Wilbur (1977b), but its outcome
was different. In L. ornatus the effeas of interference and exploitation competition appear to be nearly equivalent, particularly at lower densities. For example, the performance of
isolated individuais raised at a 1X ration is nearlv identical
to the performance of individuals raised in pairs with a ration
of 4X. The effects of interference competition increased less
when density increased from 2 to 4 individuais per container. These results suggest that the intensity of interference
competition may increase noniinearly with density and perhaps reaches an asymptote beyond which adding individuals
does not increase the intensitv of com~etition.This could be
true if interference were caused by stress, and the asymptote
would be the point at which hormonal systems were maxim d y perturbed by disturbance. This could also be true if
2X
FEEDING RATE
Fig. 10.4. Responses in body mass at day 30 of lawae ofRanasylvatica raised at three densities (1,2, and
4 per container) and three food levels (lX, 2X, and 4X). Dashed lines connect means of treaunents
expected to have the same mean mass ifinterference competition were absent, and solid lines connect
means of replicates raised at the same density. Data from Wiibur (197%).
ROSS A. ALFORD
FEEDING RATE
Fig. 10.5. Responses of body mass at day 1 1 of larvae of Limm~dyrz~esomatus
raised at three densities (1, 2,
and 4 per contwier) and three food levels (lX, 2X, and 4X). Dashed lines connea means of ueatments expeaed
t o have the same mean mass ifinterference competition were absent, and soid lines connect means of replicates raised at the same density. Vertical lines are Gabriel simultaneous 95% comparison limits for means.
interferente was caused by physicai interactions bctween in- egg size; these effects were of about the same magnitude as
dividuais, and a maximum of aggressive encounters might the effects that were related to egg size.
Newrnan (1988a, b) investigated genetic and environbe reached at intermediate dcnsities bevond which individual activity could decline. I obtained similar results in an mental infiuences on the growth and development of Scaphiexperiment with larvai Bufo marinus (Aiford 1994). Other opus couchii. In a laboratory experiment, Newman (1988b)
laboratory experiments that have examined intraspecific demonstrated that develo~mentalrate has a h e h heritabiiitv
competition include Hota and Dash (1981), Mahapatro and and that the ranking of pirformance of families can depend
Dash (1987), Mishra and Dash (1984), and Murray (1990). on the competitive regime. In another set of experiments,
Parichv and Ka~lan11992b) examined effects of maternal Newman 11988a) showed that five d sibshi~sdiffered in
investrnent on growth and survivai of larvai Bombina orien- developmental rate in the laboratory. He raised the same sibtalis in the laboratory and found that tadpoles from smaiier ships in experimental ponds with long and short durations
eggs performed worse than those from larger eggs in low- and showed that similar differences ~ersisted:the sibshi~
quality environments, but egg size had no consistent effects with the slowest rate of development experienced greater
in higher quality environrnents. They suggested that these mortality in short-duration ponds but reached greater sizes
results are consistent with the hypothesis that frogs produce in long-duration ponds.
Blouin (1992a) raised tadpoles at different food levcls
eggs of a variety of sizes as a form of "bet hedging." In a
second paper (Parichy and Kaplan 1995), they showed that (Hyhcinmea and H.gatwsa) and temperatures (H. cinerea,
larvae from larger eggs have higher sprint swimrning speeds H. ~ratiosa,and H. squirella). H c compared species mean
and may thus be more capable of avoiding predation. In norms of reaction of mass at metamorphosis and lenmh
" of
contrast, Tejedo (1992) found no trade-off between egg size larvai period across levels of food and temperature and
and number in Bufo cahmita and suggested that increases in found that the mean reaction norms of H. cinerea and H.
both the size and number of eggs with increasing femalc ~ratwsawere paraiiel across levels of food. Evidence of
body size must be caused by some other factor, perhaps differences in slope suggested species-specific differences in
"phylogenetic constraints." Egg size may not aiways be re- responses to temperature variation. Blouin suggested that
lated in a sirnple way to ecological properties of tadpoles; selection may have favored different plastic responses to
Wfiamson arid Bu (1989) found that variation in egg size temperature in the three species. Blouin (1992b) showed
within clutches of Crinia sgnifera was related to size at that some aspects of metamorph morphology in H. cinerea
hatching but not to time to-hitching or feeding. Clutches are geneticdy correlated with larva1 life history characters,
with larger average egg sizes both developed more rapidly so that selection on length of larvai period, for exarnple,
and produced larger hatchlings. They also found effects of might also d e c t size-adjusted head width at metamorphosis.
clutch on size and hatching time that were unrelated to mean
Breden and Keiiy (1982) were interested in the extent to
I
ECOLOGY
259
260
ROSS A. ALFORD
ECOLOGY
261
were unpalatable to newts (Notophthalmus viridescens) and limited predators like fish and salamanders. Size limitation
sucking (Belostoma sp.) and chewing (Anmjunius) inverte- of predators may mean that tadpoles are exposed to differing
brates. Predators exposed to unpalatable hatchlings eventu- predation risks from d ~ e r i n gsuites of predators as they
ally avoided more palatable intermediate stage (Gosner 30- grow. The ecological implications of size-specfic predator33) tadpoles. Brodie and Formanowicz suggested that this prey interactions were dscussed in detad by Persson (1988),
learned avoidance protects later stages from predation with- Polis (1988), and Wilbur (1988). M. K. Moore and Townout continued production of defensive compounds. Sheratt send (1998) discussed the effects of abiotic factors on these
and Harvey (1989) investigated the effects of absolute and interactions. Nearlv all ~redatorsthat have been examined in
relative density of tadpoles of Phyllomedusa trinitatir and Phy- the laboratory show some evidence for size-selectivity (table
salaemuspustulosus on rates of predation and prey selectivity 10.3). For many predators, decreasing predation rate with
by larvae of the odonate Pantalaj-lavescens. The consistent increasing prey size may be caused by a combination of sevpreference of Physalaenzus over Phyllomedusa independent of eral factors. The operation of the mouth or mouthparts may
absolute or relative density might reflect a dfference in palat- limit prey taken to sizes less than the maximum gape, faster
ability between the species. Denton and Beebee (1991), burst swimming rates may enable large prey to escape more
Henrickson (1990), Peterson and Blaustein (1991), and effectively (Huey 1980; S. J. Richards and Bull 1990b), and
Readmg (1990) found that Bufo eggs, embryos, or larvae larger and later stages may develop glands that secrete protective substances (Formanowicz and Brodie 1982). Laborawere less palatable than other species.
The effect of tail coloration on tadpole predation by odo- tory experiments on prey selection may or may not be realisnate naiads (Anm junius) was investigated by Caldwell tic simulations of nature; prey may be forced into closer
(1982). Tadpoles ofAGms crepitans andA.glyllus have black, contact with predators than they would normally allow, and
mottled, or clear tads. The clear morphotype was more com- outcomes may depend on exact numbers of prey exposed to
mon in permanent water containing fish, while the black tail oredators and on when data are taken.
pattern was most common in temporary pools where A.junEncounter rates between tadpoles and predators are inim was the dominant predator. She suggested that this re- fluenced by the behavior of both predator and prey. Tadpole
sulted from natural selection for crypsis in the presence of behavior may change in response to extrinsic cues having no
fish and for deflection of predator strikes away from the relation to predatory interactions and may also respond to
body when odonates were the dominant predators. The hy- cues related to predation. Some behaviors of tadpoles may
pothesis that tadpole tails may be lost to predators with little actually facihtate predation. Ideker (1976) suggested that
loss in fitness was supported by an experiment conducted by aggregation of larval Rana berlandieri near shore increased
Wilbur and Semlitsch (1990). They experimentally damaged the rate of predation by grackles. Feder (1983~)demonthe tails of Rana catesbeiana and R. sphenocephala tadpoles strated that both swimming and air-breahg increased the
and raised them in pond enclosures and in the laboratory. distance from which painted turtles (Chlysemyspicta) would
Removing any part of the tail of R. utesbeiana tadpoles attack Rana be~landiem'tadpoles. Moving tadpoles were atslowed their rates of growth and development in field enclo- tacked from &stances as great as 175 cm, whlle the maxisures. Growth rate over a 36-day period was reduced by mum &stance for attack on nonmoving tadpoles was 30 cm.
about 33%. A second experiment with R. catesbeiana in Air breathing increased rates of attack on tadpoles but did
whlch tadpoles were reared in the laboratory showed no not increase their escaoe abilitv and thus increased their
effect of any degree of tail damage on growth or develop- overall rate of loss to turtle predation. When behavior inment. There was no effect of tail damage on survival rates of creases predation risk, this increase must be offset by gains
tadpoles in either experiment. Tail damage also did not affect in fitness from other sources. Such trade-offs might prove to
survival rates of R. sphenocephala exposed to predation by be a fertile field for M e r investigation.
"
adult Notophthalmus virt'descens. Figiel and Semlitsch (1991)
Many species of tadpoles also show behavioral responses
demonstrated that tail damage needed to be severe (75% to predators that decrease their vulnerability to predation.
lost) to increase rates of crayfish predation on larval Hyla ~ a d ~ o l of
e sAscaphus @mi altered their feeding behavior in
chlysoscelis in 20-liter containers. Semlitsch (1990) also response to nonvisual cues from four predators (Feminella
found that 75% tad damage increased the rate of predation and Hawkins 1994). Caldwell (1989) suggested that Hyla
by dragonfly naiads (Tmmea lmerta) on H. chlysoscelis larvae. ~eographicatadpoles form schools to reduce individual vulIn some species tail damage may have greater effects. Parichy nerability to predation, and Rodel and Linsenmair (1997)
and Kaplan (1992a) showed that Bombina orientalis that demonstrated that swarms of larval Phlynomantis microps
hatch from larger eggs are less affected by tail injury, as are form in response to visual or olfactory cues of predator preslarvae raised at higher food levels. Tad injury tended to in- ence. Morin (1986) suggested that Psedumis C~ZGC@Y
tadcrease the larval period and decrease survival to and size at poles altered their microhabitat use in response to predation
metamorphosis in this species.
by Notophthalmus videscens. This change may have been a
The influence of body size on tadpole vulnerability to response to chemicals released by newts or other tadpoles
predation has received considerable attention. In general, or might have been a reaction to other sensory cues. Some
mechanical limitations should cause most predators to pre- chemical cues eliciting avoidance behavior may originate in
fer prey within a limited range of body sizes. This is less true the bodies of tadpoles. Hews and Blaustein (1985) demonfor some predators, such as odonate naiads, than for gape- strated that larval Bufo boreas responded to an extract of
2
262
R O S S A. A L F O R D
Table 10.3 Summary of the effects of predator and prey body size on predation rates on tadpoles. C = constant, D = decrease, I = increase,
- = not measured. Predator taxa: A = bird, B = beetle adult, b = beetle larva, F = fish, H = hemipteran or heteropteran adult, N = odonate
naiad, S = salamander adult, and s = salamander larva.
Prey
Bufo arenarum
B. bufo
Crinia s&n@a
Hyh chryoscelis
H.gratiosa
H. pseudopuma
Pleurodema borellii
Pseudaois wcifer
Pseudupblyne bibronii
Rana areolata
R. clanzitam
R sylvatica
R. warschm'tschii
Smiliscaphaeota
Predator
Effect of
Prey Size
Increase
H , Belostoma oxyuwm
S, Trituwsvubaris
B, Dytiscus lapponicus
B, Bantus exoletus
N, Aeshna sp.
N , Leucowhinea dubia
H , Notonectaglauca
N, Pantahfivescens
F, Lates calcamj2r
N , Hemicordulia tau
F, Lepomis macrocbiws
N, T m a lazerta
s, Ambystoma talpoideum
B, Rhantusguticollis
N , Sympetrum n&rocentrum
N , Aeshina sp.
F, Lates calcanj2r
N, Hemicordulia tau
F, Pyrrhulina sp.
N, Aeshnidae
N, Pantalafivescens
F, Lebidcinapanamensis
A, Pitanqus sulphuratus
b, Dytiscus verticalis
s, Ambystomajeffersonianurn
H , Lethocerus americanus
N, Hemicordulia tau
N , T m a lacerta
H, Notonecta i&a
H , Notonecta undulata
S, Triturw vubaris
N, Dytiscus lapponicus
B, Bantus exoletus
N, Aeschna sp.
N , Leucorrbinea dubia
H , Notonectaglauca
B, Dyticus verticalis
N , Anax junzus
b, Dytiscus verticalis
H , Belostoma sp.
N, Libelluh hercztlea
N , Megaluprepus caeruhtus
N , Pantalaflavescens
D
Db
I then Db
Db
I then Dh
Db
I then Db
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
C
D
D
D
D
IorD'
I
D
D
Dd
D
D
I then D
D
Db
I then Db
Db
I then Dh
Db
I then Dh
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Effect of
Predator Size
Increase
Reference
Kehr and Schnack 1991
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Hellrikson 1990
Heyer et al. 1975
K. L. Lawler and Hero 1997
S. J. Richards and Bull 1990b
Semlitsch and Gibbons 1988
Semlitsch 1990
Caldwell et al. 1980
Crump 1984
Crump 1984
Crump 1984
K. L. Lawler and Hero 1997
S. J. Richards and Bull 1990b
Gascon 1989b
Gascon 1989b
Heyer et al. 1975
Hews 1995
Crump and Vaira 1991
Brodie and Formanowicz 1983
Brodie and Formanowicz 1983
Brodie and Formanowicz 1983
S. J. Richards and Bull 1990b
Travis et al. 1985b
Cronin and Travis 1986
Cronin and Travis 1986
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Henrikson 1990
Formanowicz 1986
Brodie and Formanowicz 1983
Brodle and Formanowicz 1983
Brodie and Formanowicz 1983
Caldwell1994
Caldwell1994
Heyer et al. 1975
chemicals from injured conspecifics by increasing their over- iads of Aeshna umbrosa. Other chemical cues may originate
all activity level and avoiding areas containing the substance. in predators. Petranka et al. (1987) demonstrated that Hyla
Bufo boreas tadpoles captured by the water bug Lethocems ch~soscelistadpoles exposed to water conditioned by the fish
americanus release chemicals that act as alarm substances Leponzis cyanellus spent more time in refuges than tadpoles in
(Hews 1988). Other B. boreas tadpoles increased activity unconltioned water. Petranka and Hayes (1998) showed
rates and avoided areas where tadpoles had been injured. that larval Buj%americanus and Rana sylvatica responded to
Bufo tadpoles l d not respond to feeding by L. americanus water condtioned by the predatory odonate Anax junius by
on tadpoles of other species. In another experiment, Hews reducing activity levels and moving away from the source
(1988) showed that thls avoidance behavior was effective at of the odor. Larval B. americanus responded identically to
decreasing the vulnerability of B. boreas to predation by na- conspecific tissue extracts, whde R. sylvatica larvae ignored
264
ROSS A. ALFORD
fins and wider tail muscles despite not showing greater activity, which suggests that this response may reflect morphological plasticity triggered by exposure to predator cues.
Warkentin (1995) demonstrated that late-embryonic &alychnis callidryas respond to snake attack by hatching early,
dropping into water, and avoiding the predator. The evolution of tadpole defenses against predation is an area that deserves greater attention in future work. The influente of predation on species interactions among tadpoles wdi be
considered later in this chapter.
ECOLOGY
265
ROSS A. ALFORD
266
Table 10.4 Records of frogs calling in a seasonal tropical eucalypt w o d a n d near Townsviile, Queensland, Australia. Perm
Temp = temporary water.
permanent water,
--
T i g in Wet Season
Mxd-
Early
Taon
Bufo
marinus
cn1
' zia
desertzcola
GYCI~RIUZ
brkpes
mmhoUandtm
Limnudyastes
omatzrs
t~sm~niensis
Litm
aibo~uttata
biufior
rarmlea
fdfrw:
griuhta
Post-
Temp
Perm
Temp
Perm
Temp
Perm
Temp
Perm
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
inem
aaszrta
rothi
rubella
Upemha
lithmda
mimula
Late
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ECOLOGY
of the chosen sites and spawning phenology affect the ecology of tadpoles by defining whch species of competitors and
predators are likely to be present and whether the habitat
rnay dry before the end of the larval period. Species that
spawn very early in the history of a temporary pool rnay gain
an advantage for their larvae from the flush of primary productivity that arises from the high levels of dochthonous
nutrients available early in the hstory of such pools. Their
larvae rnay also gain size refuges from gape-limitedpredators
and gain a size-mediated advantage in competition with
other herbivores. Larvae of early spawners in permanent water bodies rnay gain simdar advantages against the larvae of
fish and insects (e.g., Majecki and Majecka 1996) that use
these sites. Several disadvantages are balanced against the advantages; spawning before temporary pools have completely
filied rnay increase the risk of desiccation for tadpoles, and
spawning early in the summer season in permanent water
rnay lead to slow growth and development caused by low
water temperatures. Such slow growth can increase the period of exposure to size-limited predators and decrease sizemediated competitive ability. With such complex possibilities, it is not surprising that frog reproduction follows a variety of phenological patterns.
Blair (1961) summarized the reproductive phenology
over a four-year period of seven species of anurans that bred
at several sites near Austin, Texas. One species bred p r i m d y
in winter, four in summer, and two in spring and autumn.
Six species cded for more than 1month. The c a h g activity
and initiation of first calling of all species was in response to
heavy rains. After initial calling, some species continued to
call any time that it rained or even with no rain, whiie others
lirnited calling activity to periods of heavy rainfai. The
sequence of c&ng and spawning by the species varied considerably among years. Temporal separation of caiiing and
spawning activity of adult frogs inhabiting a temporary pond
in Mexico was documented by J. R. Dixon and Heyer
(1968); they suggested that this phenology enforces temporal habitat segregation and resource-use differences in the
tadpole assemblage. Seasonal occurrence of tadpoles and salamander larvae was documented at a site in Maryland over
a 2-year period by Heyer (1976a). He found that the phenology and density of some species was very similar between
years, while considerable pattern changes of other species in
the same pond produced large changes in the total species
assemblage. The same pattern continued over a further two
years of monitoring at the same site (Heyer 1979).
Brook (1980) identified three seasonal patterns of c&ng
and spawning by frogs in Victoria, Australia: frogs with 4-6
week reproductive seasons occurring at roughly the same
time each year regardless of precipitation hstory, frogs with
short reproductive seasons (2-3 days) apparently initiated
by heavy rainfai, and frogs with extended reproductive seasons. The frogs breeding for 4-6 weeks began c a h g at
different times depending on the genus; Litoria, Philoria, and
Uperoleia initiated caiiing in early sumrner, while Pseudophryne started in late summer. Eggs or amplectant pairs occurred in more than 1month in 20 of 33 species.
Diaz-Paniagua (1986, 1988) studied the reproductive
267
268
ROSS A. ALFORD
ECOLOGY
269
270
ROSS A. ALFORD
typicai lotic body forms. Population densities reached relatively high levels in summer months. In a pool measuring
about 10 x 6 m with a mean depth of 40 cm, he estimated
a population of 621 14 M. schevilli (l/m2; 0.0025Jliter) and
9162258 L.~enimaculata(15.3/m2; 0.04Jliter) in late summer. Hawkins et ai. (1988) presented s d a r information
for tadpoles ofRccaphus.
umas
ECOLOGY
271
272
ROSS A. ALFORD
Laboratory Studies
Compared to the large number of laboratory studies of intraspecific competition, relatively few have examined interspecific effects. Some experiments, such as those ofAiun (1966)
and Licht (1967), have already been discussed with reference
to growth inhibition. Smith-Gill and Gill (1978) examined
interferente competition between Ranapipiens and R. ylvatzca and fed the tadpoles boiied lettuce ad libiturn. The effects
of conspecific density on R. ylvatica were curvilinear and R.
pipiens had iittie effect on R. ylvatica. Conversely, the effect
of R. ylvatica density on R. pipkns was greater than the conspecific effect of R. pipiens. The interspeciic effect of R. 91vatica on R. DiDiens was also curvilinear (i.e.. increased more
rapidly thanLiensity).They also found ekdnce for positive
effects of increasing density at lower densities. They concluded that the intensitv and even the sign of intersoecific
competition coefficients may depend on density and that extrapolation from single-densityexperiments to predict interactions over a wide ranp.e of densities is unlikelv to resuit
in realistic predictions. It wouid be interesting to perform a
similar experiment under conditions where exploitation
competition was likely to be dominant as it usually is in nature (Petranka 1989).
Travis (1980b) examined the responses of Hyhgratwsa
larvae belonging to six sibships to competition with H.femoralis lamae from a single sibship. Six of 7 experimental treatments included 20 individuais from 1H.gratiusa sibship and
20 H.femralis sibships, and the final one included 4 H.gratiosa from each of 5 of the sibshios olus 20 H. fimmalzs. The
initial densities in aii treatments were equal with 40 individuals in a plastic pan holding 6 liters of water (555/m2; 6.661
iiter). His analysis indicated that H.~ratwsasibships differed
in their compe&tiveeffects on ~.fet&raliswhose mass at day
47 of the larval period varied from means of 125-185 mg
depending on the H.gratwsa sibship with whch they were
competing. The H.gratwsa families also differed in their responses to the combination of inter- and intraspecific competition. The treatment that included H.g~atiosafrom a mixture of famiiies showed responses intermediate between, but
more variable than, the sGgle family groups.
The laboratory experiment of Aiford (1989b) was designed to determine whether variation in reproductive phenlogy of aduits might interact with gene6c variation for
factors deterrnining competitive abhty in larval H. chlysoscelis. I designed a 2 x 2 x 3 factor experiment in which
the first 2 factors were male and female oarentage and the
third was competitive regimen. Crossing two males with
each of two females gave four sibships of tadpoles. I raised
these in 3 competitive regimens: individuais alone in plastic
boxes containing 250 ml of water (83/m2; 4/iiter), 1 H.
chlysoscelis with 4 R. catesbeiana introduced simuitaneously
(4 15/m2; 20/iiter), and 1 Hyh with 4 Rana introduced on
dav 11 of the Hvh larval oeriod. These treatments simuiated
variation in the relative tirning of reproduction of Hyh and
V
Rana similar to that encountered in monitoring of field popuiations. I suppiied food to ali containers at the same dady
rate and evaluated the effects of competition on the H.
chlysoscelis tadpoles by weighing them o i day 41 of their larval periods. The presence of R. catesbeiana significantiy
reduced the mass of Hyla tadpoles. The four H. chlysoscelis
sibshps responded differentiy to competition, and the offspring of different females differed signiicantly. Offspring
from different male parents Mered significantly, but their
raniung from large to s m d changed depending on whether
competing Rana were introduced simuitaneously or later.
These results suggest that seleaion caused by phenological
variation may be a factor leading to the retention of genetic
variation in the competitive abiiity of tadpoles because different suites of characters may be advantageous depending
on when competitors reproduce.
In anothercase (pers&xd observation), I examined competitive effects of tadpoles of Limnudynastes ornatus and Litoria inermis from Australia on lamae of the exotic Bufo marinus. I raised tadpoles in 10-cm diameter x 7-cm deep plastic
containers holding 250 ml of water and suppiied food at 1
and 6X. As part of the experiient, I used 5 experimental
treatments to examine interspechc competition: 1Bufo tadpole raised alone with 1X food, 1 Bufo raised alone with 6X
food (density 127/m2;4/iiter), 1Bufo tadpole raised with 5
L. inemzis (762/m2;24/iiter), 1 Bufo with 5 L. ornatus, and 6
Bufo tadpoles. There were large differences in relative'effects
of each species on Bufo growth rate. Tadpoles of L. inemzis
had very iittie effect on growth rates of Bufo, which grew at
nearlv the same rate in comoetition with five L. inermis as
they 'did when raised alone. btraspecific competition from
Bufo had an intermediate effect, while competition from L.
ornatw had the greatest effect; Bufo raised with L. ornatus
grew very slowly and ali died before metamorphosis. These
results are consistent with what is known of the basic biology of tadpoles of each species. Limnudynactes are specialized
for rapid growth in extremely ephemeral pools; they hatch
from relatively large eggs with large yoik suppiies that d o w
them to reach large sizes within 2 days posthatchmg. They
are voracious feeders and behavioraiiv interfere with the access of other tadpoles to food sources by butting and can
reach metamorphosis in as iittie as 13 days (personal observation). ALI of these characteristics suggest that L. ornatus
tadpoles shouid be strong competitors. Tadpoles of L. inermis, which normaiiy occur in semipermanent or permanent
dams and water holes, hatch from much smaiier eggs than
L. ornatus and at a much smaiier sizes, grow more slowly
posthatching, and appear to be less aggressive (personal observation).Bufo marinus are intermediate in aii characters except aggression while feeding; they appear to be as aggressive as L. matus, but because thev are usuaiiv smaiier after
hatching and thek relative size decieases withke passage of
time, L. ornatw iarvae can outcompete them for macroscopic
food items. Semiitsch (1993) examined competition between tadpoles of species of the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta complex and showed that interspecific competition
exists, with the hybrid R. escuienta a somewhat stronger
competitor than R. iessonae.
ECOLOGY
2 73
evidence for interspecific competition with inter- and inuaspeciic competition having about equal effects. Predators
(fish, leeches, and odonate naiads) reduced sumivai and increased metamorph size of both species. Many of the results
of DeBenedictis are difficult to interpret because of highly
variable repiicates.
Artificial pond communities generally exhibit less variation among replicates than pond enclosures and therefore
ailow complex experiments with interpretable results. Interactions between competition and predation were first examined in artificial pond communities by Morin (1981). He
established 16 experimental ponds containing adult brokenstriped newts (Notophthalmusviridescens donalis) at densities
of 0,2,4, or 8 per pond (0, 1.1,2.2, or 4.4/m2). Five days
later he added hatchluigs of Pseudmi crttcifeer,Rana @emcephah, and Scaphiopus holbrookii at densities of 0.2,0.3, and
O.l/liter (110, 165, and 55/m2), respectively. The community was completed 36 days later with the addition of Bufo
tewestris hatchlings at a density of 0.3/liter (165/m2).Morin
found that ScaphUIpushad very high sumival to metamorphosis in the absence of predators (3 = 93%). Bufo ais0 survived
at a relatively high rate when predators were absent (3 =
40%). Morin attributed the low survival of Pseudacris when
predators were absent (2 = 4%) to interspecific competition.
The survival rates of Buj and Scaphiopus deched with increasing newt density and reached means of 8% and 18%,
respectively, at the highest newt density. Survival of Pseud m i increased to 28% at a newt density of l.l/m2 and remained constant at higher newt densities. Mean body mass
at metamorphosis of Pseudmi increased frorn 72 mg at a
newt density of 1.l/m2 to 211mg when 4.4 newts/m2 were
present. Data from his table 1suggest that total metamorph
biomass produced per pond deciined from about 93 g when
newts were absent to about 46 g when 4.4 newts/m2 were
present; this suggests that some competition rnay have been
caused by interferente. Aiternatively, this result could have
been caused by increased S U N ~ Vand
~ competition from larvai Rana that did not metamorphose during the period covered by his anaiyses.
Morin (1981) demonstrated that predation could aiter the competitive hierarchy in a temporary-pond system
but suffered from some lack of realism by includiig only a
single predator. In a second overlapping experiment, Morin
(1983) manipulated the abundance of a second predator, larval tiger saiamanders (Ambystoma t@rinum). Newts were established at the same densities (0,2,4, and 8 per pond) used
in the first experiment. Two additional treatments were
added: one with four adult N. v. dorsalis per pond and four
A. tigrinum per pond and one with only four A. tigrinum per
pond. Hatchling anurans were added in the sequence and
densities previously outluied in Morin (1981). Twenty-two
days after the introduction of Bufo tewestris, Morin added
Hyla chrysoscelis and H. ~ratiosaboth at densities of 83/rn2
(0.15/liter). Larval A. tt&rinurnrernoved nearly d tadpoles
from d ponds they occurred in. The effeas of newts on the
tadpole metamorph assernblage were similar to those reported in Morin (1981), although the obsemations were
over a longer period. Indusion of data on H. chrysosdlts and
274
ROSS A. ALFORD
the metamorph assemblage was afFected strongly by predators. Rana were almost eliminated from ponds with no predators, but about 10% survived in ponds with one species of
predator. Rana survival decreased to 2% when both predators were present. Bufo and l?mzrczyer were afFected similarly
by A. junius, which reduced their survival rates from 74%
and 62%, respectively, to 30%. Tramea carolina afFected l?
cmcqer and Bufo differentialiy with 0% and 35% surviving
when Tmmea were the oniy predators. When both predators
were present, their effects on Bufo appeared additive, with
about 19% of Bufo reaching metamorphosis. The survivai of
l?triseriata was afFected strongly by both dragonfly species
by declming from 62% when predators were absent to about
10% when either predator was present and 0% in the presente of both. Predation benefitted surviving B. americanus
and l? triseriata by increasing their growth rate and decreasing their larval periods; it did not afFect the performance of
the other tadpole species. Van Buslurk concluded that the
effects of predators on the tadpole assemblage were essentialiy additive and aliowed the effects of both species together to be predicted from the effects of each one alone.
This offers some hope for the eventual construaion of models of species interactions in complex communities.
Cortwright (1988) exarnined interaaions among predators and the effects of predators on their prey in 1 x 2.5-m
pens placed in a permanent pond. His predators were adult
Ambystoma *um and larval A. jefiersonianum, and A. macuhtum. The presence or absence ofA. opacum (O or 4.4/m2)
was crossed with 3 initiai densities (17, 34, or 67/m2) of
hatchling A. jeffeersonianurn. Other species were added at
equal initial densities to ali pens: hatchling A. macuhtum
(34/m2),hatchlmg Hyh chlysoscelis (92/m2),hatchling Rana
sylvatica (200/m2),and year-old ovenvintering Rana clamitans (12/m2).Cortwright found that the yearling R. chmitans were not vulnerable to salamander predation presumably because of their large body size. Hyh chlysoscelis were
virtualiy eliminated from ali pens with a maximum survival
rate of 0.2%. The fate of R. sylvatica depended on the presente ofA. opacum; when these were present, R. syltatica were
almost eliminated. WhenA. opacum were absent, about 10%
of R. sylvatua survived to metamorphosis. There was some
evidence that surviving R. sylvatica benefitted from reductions in conspecific density when the initial density of A.
j@eersonianum was higher. Cortwright and Nelson (1990) report on additional results from this experirnent.
Wilbur and Fauth (1990) examined competition and predation in a mo-predator, two-prey system in artificial ponds.
Their experiment crossed the presence and absence ofAnax
junius naiads ( m o per pond) and adult newts (Notupbthalmus virihscens; m o per pond) with the presence and absence
of tadpoles of Bufo americanus and Rana palustrs, both at
276/m2 (0.5Jliter). When predators were absent, there was
significant intra- and interspecic competition. The leve1 of
competition was reduced when predators lowered survival
rates. The survival of both species was reduced in ponds with
one predator and one prey species but to a species-specific
extent; Rana were more strongly afFected by Anax than were
Bufo. When one or two predators and both prey were pres-
ECOLOGY
275
2 ,
276
ROSS A. ALFORD
of the late-breeding species. The relative tirning of introduction altered the effects of 0. taurinw on l?tomoptema; they
were reduced when both s~ecieswere introduced simultaniously. Relative tirning did not alter the competitive effect of
0. taurinus on E. fenzoralis. S. P. Lawler and Morin (1993)
used artificial pond experiments to determine how Bufo
woodhousii and Pseuducris crucqer larvae responded to O,
7, and 14 day lags in tirning of reproduction. They found
that the species responded asymmetricdy; Pseudacvis were
affectedmore strongly by Bufo when Bufo were introduced 7
days before them, while Bufo were not affected by Pseudacvis.
They concluded that the usual pattem in nature, in which
Pseudami's reproduce very early, probably maxirnizes the success of this competitively inferior species.
Competition may be direct, through the use of the same
resources or behavioral or chemical interferente, or indirect,
through alterations to the physical or biological structure of
the environment. Wilbur and Alford (1985) demonstrated
that tadpoles may affect other species through persistent
effects on the environment. We examined the effects of pond
history and competition on the performance of ~ ~ l a h r
soscelis larvae. Hyh were introduced at a density of 274/m2
(0.5lliter) to the artificial ponds used in a separate experiment (Alford and Wdbur 1985. discussed above) 80 davs
after &e ponds were initiaiiy filld. They were als raised in
a set of ponds that had been filled only 15 days previously
and had never been occupied by other tadpoles. This led to
H. chvsoscelis tadpoles experiencing ponds with 10 different
hstories: 15- and 80-day-oldponds that had never been occupied by tadpoles, 80-day-old ponds that had been occupied by Rana sphenoc~.phalaor Bufo americanus for 66 or 72
days, and 80-day-old ponds that had been occupied by both
Rana and Bufo for various combinations of 66 and 72 days.
Most Bufo had completed metamorphosis before any Hyla
were introduced to the ponds; effects of Bufo on Hyla thus
were caused by environmental alterations rather than direct
competitive effects. Growth and survival ofH. chrysosceliswas
greatest in 15-day-old ponds. Eighty-day-old ponds that had
never been occupied by other tadpoles produced the next
best Hyh performance. The presence of Bufo or Rana decreased the performance of Hyla metamorphs, which was
also iduenced by the order in whch Bufo and Rana had
been introduced.
Indirect effects between tempordy separated species
were examined further by Morin (1987), who introduced
Pseudacvis crucifer tadpoles to experimental ponds at 55, 110,
and 220/m2 (0.1, 0.2, and 0.41hter). These were crossed
with densities of the predatory newt Notophthalmw viridescens at 0, 2, or 4 per pond (0, 1.1, or 2.2/m2). Forty-three
days later, about 1week before Pseudacri's began to metamorphose, Morin added hatchling Hyh versicolor to d ponds at
a density of 110/mZ(0.2lliter). Newts had little effect on the
growth .and survival of Pseudacri's, but increasing newt density strongly decreased the survival to metamorphosis of
Hyla. When newts were absent, the total froglet biomass exported from ponds was relatively constant (about 75 g). The
proportion of that biomass attributed to Hyla depended
strongly on the initial density of Pseudami's; although d
ECOLOGY
277
Summary
The avaiiable information on the ecology of tadpoles has increased greatly since Wilbur's (1980) review. Tadpoles have
proved to be a valuable model system for investigation of
many aspeas of population and cornmunity ecology. In the
course of these investigations, it has become clear that a iii
understandmg of the ecology of any tadpole assemblage requires data of severai types. First, there must be information
on reproductive habitat choice and phenology of the frog
species mhabiting that region. Choices of reproductive habitats by frogs set the range of possible tadpole assemblages
that may develop. Reproductive phenology can predetermine the outcomes of interactions between tadpoles and
their competitors and predators. Second, mformation on the
reproductive habitat use and phenology of potential predators is necessary for the same reasons. I suggest that information on potential competitors belonging to other phyla will
aiso be needed. Third, it is necessary to have mformation
on tadpole, predator, and probably interphyletic competitor
densities. Finaiiy, information on resource availabhty, habi-
278
ROSS A . ALFORD
tat stnicture, behavioral responses of tadpoles to competitors and predators, and the previous history of the habitat
may be needed. A lack of any of this information may lead
to incorrect predictions about the course of interactions in
any tadpole assemblage. Extrapolation from ecological interactions experienced by tadpoles to their effects on the population biology of frogs requires much more information on
the biology of metamorph and juvenile fkogs than is currently avadable for nearly d species. This complex picture is
far from the optimisticdy sirnple views of community ecology that prevailed in the early 1970s (see May 1974). It is
also far from the nondeterminism espoused by some authors
(see Strong 1983). Rather, it appears that tadpole assemblages, and probably complex assemblages of other species,
are highly deterministic but that a great deal of information
is needed to unravel the sources of that determinism.
I identified several areas that are in particular need of h r ther investigation. To fully understand the autecology of tadpoles, detaded studies on their foods, feeding rates, and assimilation efficiencies must be initiated. Such studies also
would aid in understandmg the role of tadpoles in communities. Although the evidence is sparse, tadpoles may provide
a major source of ine particulate organic matter for detritivores. Studies of interphyletic interactions between tadpoles
and other aquatic herbivores would also aid in examining
this connection.
Despite the comparatively great amount of work that has
examined the relative imponance of interference and exploitation as competitive mechanisms in tadpoles, some good
areas for investigation in these fields remain. Combining the
quantitative genetic approach with ecological experiments
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would Me to thank S. J. Richards for h s considerable assistance in reading and commenting on drafts of the manuscript and for access to h s comprehensive reprint collection.
R. Altig and R. W. McDiarmid provided imrnense assistance
in keeping up with developments in the field during the prolonged gestation of the book and made many invaluable editorial comments and corrections. I would also like to thank
L. J. Alford and M. N. Hearnden for comments on the
manuscript and my students K. S. Bradfield, M. R. Crossland, W. Martin, and M. I? Trenerry for discussions and access to their data. Support for my research was provided by
several Australian Research Council grants, the Council of
Nature Conservation Ministers, and the Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management.
REID N. HARRIS
280
the evolutionary
of interest is that the larvai stage
. hypothesis
.is where adaptations to maximize growth rate are expected.
Evidence consistent with this hypothesis would include the
presence of nonadditive genetic variation for growth rate
&d a response to naturaiselection on genotype< that M e r
in growth rate. Trade-offs between growth rate and other
traits, such as competitive ability or antipredator mechanisms, might aiso be expected (Aiford 1986a, 1989a, b). If
the gowth rate maximikon hypothesis is correct, selection
has favored growth over other traits to the degree that any
confia among fnctions exist.
Rapid g r o d rate d o w s a tadpole to reach a sue refuge
from many gape-limited predators and achieve a large body
size at metamorphosis. Aiso, larvae quickly attain the minimum size needed for metamor~hosisand have the o ~ t i o n
to metamorphose if the pond kgins to dry or if pre&on
pressures increase. Body size at metamorphosis can be negatively correlated with age at first reproduction and positively
correlated with sue at first reproduction (Berven and Giii
1983; D.C. Smith 1987). Thus, a high larvai growth rate is
also of potential value in terrestrial survival, fecundity, mating success, and age at first reproduction. Predator avoidance and resistance to parasitism are other important traits
that can be disassociated from growth rate and may be involved in phenotypic or geno<pic trade-offs with-growth
rate.
Morphologicdy, tadpoles appear primarily adapted for
feeding and therefore achieving maximal growth. A large
proportion of a tadpole's biomass (50%) is accounted for by
its digestive tract (Wassersug 1974). Many of the morphological variations of buccopharyngeal (buccal filters) and oral
(papiiiae, labial teeth) features are correlated with the mode
of feeding (e.g., carnivorous, suspension feeding, scraping;
Altig and Johnston 1989; Orton 1953; Wassersug and
Hever 1988). In "
general. carnivores have reduced branchiai
filters, buccal papdiae, and labial teeth, whereas suspension
feeders have the most elaborate buccopharyngeai
structures.
Suaoriai and surface feeding forms have major morphologicai features associated with feedmg (Altig and Johnston
1989; Orton 1953).
1
growth is restrained and the degree of restraint can be modeled by the coupled equations
and
Here, y is the size-specificgrowth rate, and a is the exponentiai decay of the size-specificgrowth rate. Physiologicdy, y
can represent the rate of ceii division; (Y can represent ceii
death, slowing of division rates, and the truncation of
growth as tissue differentiation occurs. The solution of the
coupled equations is
(5)
This model ~rovidesan im~ortantframework for a discussion of evolutionary and ecological questions (Travis
1980a; Wilbur and Collins 1973). First, it deimeates three
wavs in which final size can be afTected: f. 1)variation in initia size (W,), (2) variation in size-specific growth rate (y),
and (3) variation in the exponentiai decay of the size-specific
rate (a). AI parameters can be afeaed intrinsicdy by genotype and extrinsicdy by environmental faaors. In addition, variation in initial sue ( W,) could result from variation
in egg sizes, including yolk content, or from geneticaliy or
environmentdy caused variation in embryogenesis. The parameter (Y can be thought of as the rate of change of the sizespecific growth rate and may increase or decrease throughout the iarval ~ e r i o d .Thus. differences in size-s~ecific
growth rate, y, can be based on Merences in y,, a , or both
(Travis 1980a).
Based on developmentai events, the previous equations
predict that growth wiii be size specific; this leads to interactions among the parameters. Dserences in initial size
among individuais or sibships wdi be translated into differences-h dWldt. An increase in final size at metamor~hosis
can be achieved by beginning at a larger size that ;an be
maintained by a constant size-specificgrowth rate and a constant damping parameter (a).A large size at metamorphosis
can aiso be achieved by beginning growth earlier and at a
higher size-specificrate (y,). Early growth may be a conservative trait maxirnized by selection, but the damping pararneter, a, may be plastic and underlain by a large amount of
genetic variation (Travis 1980a). Rapid early growth aows
the tadpole to escape gape-limited predators and to reach the
size suitable for metamorphosis if the pond begins to dry or
predation pressure increases. Tadpoles are under selection
for rapid growth; thus, a variable a would seem maladaptive.
1
T H E ANURAN TADPOLE
281
Maintenance of genetic variation for the damping parame- ability to dissociate growth rate and developmental rate can
ter, a,may be explained by relatively weak selection on late occur throughout the larval period afier a minimum metagrowth rate as compared to early growth rate in the tadpole morphic si; is attained.
stage (Travis 1980a). Once a tadpole achieves the minimal
Travis (1984) presented a fixed-rate model that predicts
size necessary to metamorphose, the selective pressure on that growth rate and developmental rate are dissociated oniy
growth rate may relax because of the option of metamorpho- during the early parts of the larval period. Developmental
sis. If resources decline or predation pressure remains high, rate is set toward the beginning of the larval period, and subthen selection would favor the metamorphic decision (Wil- sequent changes in growth rate change oniy size at metamorbur and Cohns 1973). A negative genetic correlation be- phosis. Hensley (1993) modified the Wilbur-Collinsmodel
tween growth rate and length of larval period (Travis et ai. ;o take into account a fixed develo~mentdrate late in the
1987; discussed below) is another explanation for the persis- larval period. Changes in growth rate that occur late in detente of genetic variation for later growth rate.
velopment affect size at metamorphosis and not developA t e m for developmentai rate (Mord and Harris 1988; mental rate. The proportion of the larval period that is sensiHensley 1993; Leips and Travis 1994; Smith-Giil and Ber- tive to changes in growth rate is the fundamental difference
ven 1979; Wilbur and Coilins 1973) is lacking in the above between the Wilbur-Coiiins and fixed-rate models. This senequations. Wdbur and Coliins (1973) predicted that growth sitive period may be variable. Indeed, K. A. Berven (perrate and developmental rate should be dissociable (i.e., de- sonal communication) has evidence that populations of
velopmental rate should be responsive to changes in growth Rana sylvatica differ in the fraction of the larval period that
rate). In an experimental study, Bufo woodbousiifowle~tad- is responsive to changes in growth rate. This difference sugpoles did slow their developmental rate in response to an gests that variation among populations and species could be
enhanced growth rate (Mord and Harris 1988). In Scaphw- correlated with selective environments or revresent different
pus couchii, the degree of correlation of developmental and "solutions" to maximizing size at metamorphosis.
growth rate varied among sibships. Sibships that had a rapid
Mord and Harris (1988) argued for an experimental
developmentai rate could not alter it in response to an en- manipulation to evaluate adequately the Wilbur-Collins or
hanced opportunity for growth (e.g., a long-duration pond). fixed-rate models because Merent correlative patterns are
This implies a "tight link between growth and development" consistent with either model. For example, Coiiins (1979)
(Newman 1988a). Other sibships characterized by a weaker stated that a positive relationship between length of larvai
correlation between growth and developmental rates had period and mass at metamorphosis of field-coiiected metaa slower overail developmental rate and were able to take morphs would support the Wdbur-Cohns model. As the
advantage of enhanced growth oppomnities. Temperature first larvae metamorphose, more resource per capita is left.
affects growth and developmental rate differentiaily in tad- Larvae delay metamorphosis to take advantage of the inpoles of Rana ylvatua (Smith-Giiiand Berven 1979). Exper- creased "
nrowth rate. This assumes that resource level is conimental evidence indicates that growth and developmental stant or increasing in the pond. Resource level can decline
rates are separate biological entities and are dissociable in during the season if primary productivity decreases or if prianuran larvae. A quantitative model that incorporates the mary productivity is constant, and increasingly larger tadgrowth parameters discussed above with developmental pa- poles consume more. In this case, a negative correlation
rameters is needed.
would be generated even if the larvae are conforming to the
Wilbur-Collins model.
Models ofMetamorphu TzmingThe fixed-rate model also can generate either a positive
The ability to time the change between iife-history stages in or negative correlation of length of larval period and size at
a way that wiil enhance fitness is a key adaptation of any metamorphosis, assurning some variation in developmental
species that has more than one iife-history stage. Wilbur and rate is present. Larvae with a fixed rapid developmentai rate
Coilins (1973) proposed a model that predicts the timing of metamorphose early, freeing resources for larvae that have a
amphibian metamorphosis. The cornerstone of their hy- slow developmentalrate. This situation would lead to a posipothesis is that growth rate (GR) and developmental rate tive correlation. If resources are deciining over time, a nega(DR) are dissociated (see chaps. 9 and 10). The degree to tive correlation would be produced. Variation in developwhich dissociation is possible represents an adaptation; the mental rate can be caused by underlying genetic variation or
degree to which dissociation is not possible represents con- by a response to competition early in the larval period. In
straint. Growth rate is the change in body size over time. summary, since either model can generate a positive or negaDevelovmental rate is the avvea&ce of new features (bio- tive correlation of length of larval period and size at metachernical, morphological, behavioral) in the organism over morphosis, an experimental analysis is required to ascertain
time (Gosner 1960; A. C. Taylor and Koiiros 1946). The how individuais are making metamorphic decisions.
Wdbur-Coiiins model ~redictsthat if the nrowth rate of the
Three ex~eriments
that tested larval resDonses to inI
larva increases, developmental rate is retarded to capitalize creases and decreases in food level address predictions of
on the improved growth conditions. If growth rate de- the Wilbur-Coiiins and fixed-rate models. Mord and Harris
creases, developmental rate is predicted to increase to escape (1988) exposed tadpoles of Bufo wooa!housiifowle~to eight
to the model, &e experimental treatments. Four treatments initiaily had low
a deterioratini environment.~ccordin~
L L
T H E ANURAN T A D P O L E
r ,
283
a"
a>
Time
Time
Time
Time
Time
Fig. 11.1. Graphicai model of energy aiiocation during development
and growth of larvai amphibians. (A) The proportion of energy aocated to development by larvai anurans. (B) ~ h proportionai
e
amount
of energy aiiocated to growth. (C) The absolute amount of energy aocated to development. (D) The absolute amount of energy aiiocated to
growth. (E) The absolute amount of energy allocated to growth if
food Irvel changes after metamorphosis has been initiated. The rectangle at the right side of each graph denotes that period of time from the
initiation of metamorphosis until metamorphic climax. Abbreviations:
D = development, G = growth, H F = hgh food condition, and
LF = low food condition.
284
REID N. HARRIS
individuals devote proportionally fewer resources to development and more to growth in order to take advantage of
favorable conditions for growth (figs. 11.lA, B). Individuals
are able to devote absolutely more energy to both development and growth at high food conditions (figs. 11.lC, D).
It foliows that individuals at low food conditions metamorphose at a smaiier size after a long larval period, and individuais at high food conditions metamorphose at a larger size
in a short time. Upon the initiation of metamorphosis, suggested to be between Gosner 35-38 (Hensley 1993), develpmental rate is ixed and begins to consumi a greater proportion of energy because of morphologic and other changes
associated with metamorphosis induced by increasing titers
of thyroxine. Proportional and absolute amounts of energy
devoted to growth decline. The observation that individual
growth curves tend to level off or drop toward metamorphic
climax supports the idea that less energy is devoted to
growth, presumably in favor of an increased allocation to development.
Changes in the food level prior to fixation of developmental rate will have prediaable results; increases in food
level wiii lower the proportion of energy aiiocated to development but allow a greater absolute amount of energy to be
allocated to development. A greater proportion and absolute
amount of energy is aiiocated to growth; length of larvai period will decrease and size at metamorphosis will increase.
Decreases in food level will increase the ~ r o ~ o r t i oofn energy aiiocated to development but a small absolute amount
of energy will be available for development. Proportionaiiy
and absolutely, little energy is allocated to growth. Length of
larvai period increases and size at metamorphosis decreases
relative to individuais that experiente constant high food.
Changes late in the larvai period occur after the developmental trajeaory is fixed; the absolute amount of energy devoted to development also is ixed. A change to high food
conditions means that a smaii but increasing amount of energy is committed to finishing metamorphosis. A very large
vro~ortionof the increased resources can be devoted to
growth, which results in a large increase in size at metamorphosis (fig. 11.1E).A change to low food implies that a large
and increasing amount of energy is required to complete the
fixed developmental trajeaory. Essentially, all energy is devoted to development and none to growth, with perhaps
some negative growth required to complete metamorphosis
on the rapid developmentai trajectory (fig. 11.1E). A large
decrease in body size is possible. N o asymmetries in response to increasing and decreasing food levels at different
aaes
" are ~redicted.
The Aidence from three studies that have investigated
larvai responses to increases and decreases in food level, in
addition to supporting the modified Wdbur-Collins model
as presented by Hensley (1993), also supports the graphical
model of resource allocation discussed above. Recall that
Leips and Travis (1994) prediaed asymmetrical effeas from
chGging food levels at di-fferenttimes, whereas the graphicai
model does not. Aiford and Harris (1988) found no asymmetry from changing food levels at different times. All
groups that received increased food at different times were
I
not significantly different from each other in mass at metamorphosis. Two groups that received decreased food, including the 1 s t group to be switched, metamorphosed at
the same mass. Hensley (1993) also found no asymmetry in
responses. Early increases and decreases in food levels had
their greatest effea on size at metamorphosis. Leips and
Travis (1994) presented evidence that responses were asymmetric for Hyla cinerea but not for H. gratwsa. Body size
(SVL) at metamorphosis did not differ significantly for all
groups that received increased food levels at different times
in both species. Two groups of H.gratwsa that received decreased food, including the last group to be switched, metamorphosed at the same s&. Earlier decreases in food level
had more of an effect than late decreases in H. cinerea. N o
asymmetry of responses was found in recent studies by Beck
(1997) on H. squirella and Tejedo and Reques (1994b) on
Bufo calamita.
Metamorphosis does not seem to be possible until a minimum size is attained. A panadaptationist might suggest that
metamorphosis at a very smaii size is better than death in
a drying pond. Metamorphosis at a smaii size can decrease
terrestriai performance (Emerson 1986; Pough and Kamel
1984; Taigen and Pough 1985).A developmental constraint
may exist because adult organs may not form below a cem&
size. The maximum size that a species attains at metamorphosis is very likely an adaptation to average opportunities
for growth and mortality rates experienced on land. However, mapping metamorphic trait values on anuran phylogenies would be vaiuable as a means of assessing the relative
role of seleaion and evolutionary history.
T H E ANURAN TADPOLE
285
286
REID N. HARRIS
size at metamorphosis. Not enough information on the actuai genetic architecture of these traits exists, but the partial
didel designs of Alford (1986a, 1989a), Blouin (1992b),
Newman (1988a, b), and Travis et ai. (1987) show irnportant progress in this area. The pattern of existing underlying
variation (additive, nonadditive, maternal) is expected to
differ depending on past selective environment of the population (see discussion below).
T H E ANURAN TADPOLE
Table 11.1 Heuristic rnodels that explore the outcorne of selection on larvai and adult traits. (A) Depiction of
a rnodel by Faiconer (1989) and (B-D) extensions of that model. Fitness vaiues for genes affecting larvai (horizontai axis) and adult (verticai axis) traits are shown in left pane1 of each section. Genetic combinations that
are h e d , selectively eliminated, or rernain neutrai are shown in right panel.
A. Correlated selection on larvai and adult stages: no selection for coupling or uncoupling of stages, and the
life cycle is cornplex. Genes affecting the same trait in the larva and adult in favorable and unfavorable
ways are given fitness values of + 1and - 1, respectively.
Fitness Values
Eliminated
Neutrai
B. Selection on the adult stage, uncouplmg of stages, and no evolution in the larvai stage; the life cycle is
complex. Genes that affect a trait in the adult in favorable and unfavorable ways are given fitnesses of 1
and - 1, respectively. Genes that affect the trait in the larva in any way are selected against (fitness of
- 1). There is selection for uncoupling (+ 1) and against coupling (- 1) of the trait in larva and adult.
Fitness Values
Eliminated
Neutrai
C. Selection on the adult stage in a species with direct developrnent. Genes that affect the trait in the adult in
favorable (+) and unfavorable (-) ways are given fitnesses of 1and - 1, respectively. Genes that affect
the trait in the ernbryo in any way are selectively neutrai. There is no selection for uncoupling or against
coupling of the trait in larva and adult.
Fitness Values
Eliminated
Neutrai
D. Selection on the adult stage for uncoupling of stages and against any cturent or past correlated evolution
of the ernbryo; the life cyde is now cornplex after a period of direct developrnent. Genes that affect the
adult in favorable (+) and unfavorable (-) ways are given fitness vaiues of 1and - 1, respectively.
Genes that affect the larva in any way are selected against (fitness of - 1). There is selection for
uncoupliig and against coupling of the trait in larva and adult as in B.
Fitness Vaiues
The work ofTravis et ai. (1987) included a principal component analysis (PCA)of the phenotypic, additive, nonadditive, and environmentalcorrelation matrices for growth rate,
length of larval period, and size at metamorphosis. For the
phenotypic variation, the first principal component that
Eliminated
Neutrai
288
REID N. HARRIS
T H E ANURAN TADPOLE
A 1
Ancestral trajectory
Ancestral traiectorv
Ancestral trajectory
Ancestral
trajectory
D Specialized
b
ladult
i z
--.
SIZE
Fig. 11.2. Graphicai model to iiiusuate the evolution of divergent Me
history stages in amphibians. (A) Ancesuai size-shape uajectory that
leads to little phenotypic vanation between stages. Metamorphosis
occurs at the break in the trajectory. (B) Selection for a specialized
adult reduces the slope of the larvai trajectory if the developrnentai programs are correlated. Metamorphosis occurs at the breaks in the trajectories. The dashed lines in the late larvai and adult trajectones indicate
new shapes that are not characteristic of previous ontogenetic stages.
(C) Selection for a s p e c i k d adult when the developmental programs
are uncoupled. The larva of the specialized adult foiiows the ancestral
larvai uajectory. Metamorphosis occurs at the breaks in the trajectories.
The dashed line in the adult trajectory indicates a new shape that is not
characteristic of previous ontogenetic stages. (D) Once uncoupling
occurs, the larva aiso can diverge from the ancestral trajectory. Metarnorphosis occurs at the breaks in the trajectories. The dashed lines
the adult and larvai trajectories uldicate new shapes that are not characteristic of previous ontogenetic stages.
289
REID N. HARRIS
290
and uncoupiing (Jagersten 1972). Direa development removes a larva from manv of the faaors of external selection
present in the environment of a free-iiving larva (Lutz
1948). Seleaion for adult specialization would produce correlated larval morphologies that may be maladaptive, but
such morphologies would be exposed to weak selection. The
genes that coded for adult speciahzations and larval evolution, +/+ , -/+, and o/+, would tend toward ixation (table
11.1C). The neutral combinations of -/O, +/O, and 010
would covary. Adult evolution occurs, but the embryo does
not evolve (fig. 11.1C).
Should seleaion again favor an aquatic larva, the embryo
(now tadpole) would be exposed to seleaion. With seleaion
for uncoupling of larval and postlarval stages, the +/+ and
-/+ genes would be eiiminated rapidly (table 11.1D). The
loss of + genes that d e c t adult specialization in the desired
direction would lead to regression of the adult specialization. After selection, only the +/O and -/O genes would
contribute to the covariance because the O/- genes had been
selectively eliminated.
What are the differences between simultaneous selection
for a change in adult specialization and uncoupling in species
with a complex Me cycle (table 11.1B) as opposed to a species that secondariiy evolved a complex iife cycle from direa
development (tables 11.lC, D)? The simple models predia
that in both cases the O/+ genes wiil tend toward ixation
and that the evolution of uncoupling of traits has occurred.
One difference is that the O/- genes are neutral in the simultaneous selection case but eliminated selectively in the direa
development scenario. Selection for uncoupli& after direa
development allows a greater initial speciaiization in the
adult stage. This may make it more probable that a complex
Me cycle with a major metamorphosis will evolve from an
ancestor with direa development. This sirnple heuristic
model needs to be developed quantitatively in order to explore further the evolution of divergent life history stages.
The model suggests an alternative pattern to the one proposed for plethodontid salamanders. Based on work with
Eulycea, Aiberch (1987) proposed that compartmentahzation of larval and adult development programs may have
d o w e d a suppression of the larval structures by direa developers. If true, compartmentahation preceded direct
development. The model presented here for protoanurans
suggesis that direct development preceded selection for
compartmentahzation.
1s there any evidence that direct development did or did
not facilitate the evolution of divergent Me stages in anurans? Can direa development be considered primitive in
frogs? I argue that if direa development is primitive, then
an analysis of Leiupelmu, which retains many primitive traits,
or a fossii ancestor should reveal a larval size-shape trajeaory
that retains prirnitive, perhaps salamander-like traits. If dir e a development is derived, then Lewpelma and other species with direa develo~mentshould have a iarval size-sha~e
trajectory that retains some trace of a tadpolelike trajeaory.
Most workers have considered a complex life cycle to the
primitive in anurans ( D u e h a n 1989; Noble 1925a; Orton
1953; Szarski 1957; but see Bogart 1981). The argument
I
T H E ANURAN TADPOLE
29 1
i l
292
REID N. HARRIS
has played an important role in the larvai biology of many pended aigae. How resource concentration would interact
species (chap. 9), and this rnay lead to an overali increase in with relative size of the filtering surfaces to affect size-specific
fitness to the individual with a complex life cycle in environ- growth rate needs investigation.
ments that aliow it.
A comparison of size-specific growth rates of ranid tadComplex life cycles have been stable over long periods poles tends to support the hypothesis that a large body size
of evolutionary time (Bolt 1977; Wassersug 1975). A theo- decreases the efficiency of suspension feeding. Werner
reticai model by Istock (1967) suggested that such stability (1986) reviewed data for severai species of&na and found
is unexpected, thus creating Istock's paradox. A critical as- that size-specific growth rates increase and then decrease
sumption of Istock's model was that no genetic correlation over the larvai period. The decrease in growth rate as body
exists between traits in both stages thereby allowing inde- size increases late in the larvai period is not associated with
pendent evolution. This leads to the suggestion that stages the typicai depression in growth rate at metamorphosis.
d differ consistently in rates of adaptation. Genotypes as- These data are consistent with a mechanistic explanation of
sociated with a reduction or elimination of the less adapted decreasing efficiency of tadpole feeding as body size instage wiil be favored. The assurnption of genetic correlition creases and with the hypothesis that larvae (see above) d o has been evaiuated in only two studies with anurans (Blouin cate greater proportions of energy to development late in the
1992b; Emerson et ai. 1988) and is discussed below. Istock's larvai period. However, some species can grow exponenparadox can be resolved with the foliowing three explana- tially throughout their larvai period if resources are adequate
tions: functionai constraints, fluctuating selection, and ge- (e.g., ALford and Harris 1988, Bufo woodhousiifwleri). Exponentiai growth implies a constant size-specific growth rate
netic correlations.
Functionai constraints of tadpole morphology and physi- throughout the larvai period (see eq. [I]).
ology rnay lead inevitably to metamorphosis. Anuran tadUnder some ecologicai conditions, aquatic growth as a
poles become less efficient feeders as they grow. Wassersug large larva, with its relatively smalier filtering surfaces, rnay
(1975) argued that the surface area-to-volume ratio of the stili carry a higher fitness than metamorphosis to a terrestrial
filtering surfaces of a tadpole decreases as biomass of the tad- stage at a smder size. This would select for paedomorphosis
pole increases, and this creates less efficient feeding at in- or the relative lengthening of the larvai stage. An unfavorcreasing size. This ratio creates an upper limit to the size of able terrestrial environment would create such a selective rethe branchiai basket in tad~olesof ali s~ecies.In order to gime. More snidies that integrate the relationship of larvai
overcome this constraint, evolution in the tadpole would size to filtering efficiency, assimilation percentage (Aitig and
have to proceed via a peak shift (an ontogenetic change in McDearman 1975), metabolic costs of feeding, and specific
trophic morphology and behavior tantamount to a meta- growth rates are needed. For example, tadpoles of species
that metamorphose at a small body size (e.g., Bufo) apparmorphosis; S. Wright 1931).
Morphological anaiyses provide an explanation for the ently can maintain a constant size-specific growth rate while
decreasing trophic efficiency hypothesis. Oral trophic stmc- those of species that metamorphose at a large body size (e.g.,
tures show isometric growth or negative dometric growth Rana) cannot.
Functionai constraints in the form of decreasing trophic
with body size (Wassersug 1976a). In the latter case, feeding
structures become relatively smder as the tadpole increases efficiency with increasing larvai body size can provjde a parin size. A positive allometsr of filtering surfaceand body size tiai resolution of Istock's paradox. The tadpole stage is
would lead to a tadpole with an increasingly crowded body thought to be an adaptation to exploit ephemerai but favorcavity. Wassersug (1975) suggested that there rnay be an up- able growing conditions, aithough the isometry of filtering
Der limit to the size of the branchiai basket: the branchiai surfaces to body size rnay lead to a slowing of further growth
I
baskets of large Pseudis paradoxa tadpoles are no larger in (Wassersug 1976a). Wassersug's argurnent leads to the sugabsolute terms than those of &na catesbeiana larvae.
gestion that the adult stage wiil displace the larvai stage over
Wassersug (1975) tested the hypothesis that large body evolutionary time because the rate of adaptation slows in the
size decreases the relative size of the filtering surfaces and larval stage (i.e., larvae are as "adapted" as they can get bethus decreases feeding efficiency. He found that 12 smali cause of allometric constraints) but not in the adult stage.
Ranapipiens tadpoles cleared their guts more rapidly than This resolution rests on the assumption that large size in a
three large tadpoles of the same combined weight. Wasser- tadpole is always adaptive. The existente of species that typisug (1975) did not measure the metabolic costs of feeding caliy metamorphose at a smali size, such as Buf, suggests
in small and large individuais. Large tadpoles rnay be less that metamorphosis at a smali body size can be an adaptaefficient feeders, but they rnay spend less energy feeding. If tion. Furthermore, the rate of larvai adaptation can proceed
true, the net energy return per unit time rnay have been aiong numerous other axes, including the evolution of
greater in the large tadpoles. Further experiments with a va- mechanisms of predator avoidance, increased competitive
riety of species with the same and different feeding modes abdity, and digestive efficiency.
need to be conducted to test W y the hypothesis. For exWassersug (1975) considered life-cycle evolution in diample, R. pipiens has keratinized mouthparts, which suggests chotomous terms: either the population retains or eliminates
that the species rnay not function primarily as a fiiter feeder a stage. It seems more likely that selective pressures wiil op(R. Aitig, personal communication). Sede and Beckvar erate to increase or decrease the relative durations of a stage.
(1980) and Sede and Wassersug (1979) showed that tad- If selection favored the larvai stage for a long period, two
poles can adjust filtering rates to the concentration of sus- outcomes are conceivable. One would be the elimination of
293
the adult stage (paedomorphosis). As Wassersug noted, this relation between lengths of the two stages is of interest. If
would require a reworking of the tadpole body plan to make longevity is constant among individuais, then the length of
space for eniarged gonads, to aiter amplexus or other mating larvai and adult stages necessarily are negatively correlated,
behaviors, and to overcome a lack of emetic behavior that is but longevity in the larvai and adult stages might be posirequired for oviposition and sperm extmion (Naitoh et ai. tively geneticaiiy correlated. Individuals with longer larval
1989). Paedomorphic tadpoles may not be an evolutionary periods might aiso live longer after metamorphosis. If there
possibility. This is a consequence of the high degree of diver- is no genetic correlation between length of larval stage and
gente between life stages. The same phenomenon occurs in length of adult stage then persistent or fluctuating variation
insects; the oniy truiy larvai reproduction in insects is asso- in length of larval period wdi have iittle effect on evolution
ciated with par;henogenesis (H. F. Nijhout, personal com- in the adult stage and therefore persistence of a complex iife
munication). Wassersug's question, "Why there are no pae- cycle. This has not been estimated in anurans, and its estimadomorphic tadpoles?" could be foliowed by the question, tion in a variety of species would be of interest.
"Why are there no parthenogenetic tadpoles?"
The occurrence of genetic correlations for Me-history
The relative lengthening of the larvai stage, resulting in traits across stages provides a t h r d resolution of Istock's para single breeding period shortly after metamorphosis (e.g., adox. The possibility of antagonistic pleiotropy (M. J. Rose
ephemeropteran insects; Istock 1984) is another possible 1982) could explain the maintenance of a complex Me cycle.
evolutionary outcome of a highly adapted larvai stage. This If the genotype that codes for a complex of adaptive adult
hypothesis could be tested by geographical comparisons. For traits does not code for the most favorable complex of adapexample, one might expect that populations that occupy fa- tive larvai traits, then genetic variation for those traits and
vorable adult environments but consistentlv use IDoor larval the concornitant complex life cycle could be maintained. A
environments should have a relativelv short larvai period. polymorphism would be achieved as two solutions come to
Populations from the center of a geographical range may oc- an equilibrium: less adapted larvae and more adapted adults
cupy equally favorable larval and adult habitats. Populations versus more adapted larvae and less adapted adults. If geat the edge of the range iikely exist in a poor larvai or poor netic correlations across life-history stages exist, it would be
adult habitat. The goal would be to identi@ areas where the unlikely or impossible for one stage to evolve at a faster rate.
environment was iimiting only on the larva or only on the This hypothesis could be tested with a conventionai quantiadult. A geographical comparison of the relative durations of tative genetic anaiysis, such as a ha-sib design that foliows
larvai and adult periods would be of great interest. Indeed, tadpoles into adulthood and measures trait values for both
Berven et ai. (1979) found that montane populations of stages (Faiconer 1989). Additive genetic correlations beRana clamitans have evidence of past selection for a shorter tween larvai and adult Me-history traits could be estimated
larval period relative to lowland populations. The montane (e.g., Emerson et ai. 1988). Selection experiments on larvai
ponds arguably are poorer larvai environments than lowland and adult traits with an assay for correlated selection reponds. The techniques of common garden (e.g., Berven sponses of larvai and adult traits aiso could be used. The long
et ai. 1979) and reciprocal transplant experiments could be generation time of many anuran species would make selecemployed to test whether any observed differences have a tion experiments problematic. Species with generation times
genetic basis. Because of the long generation times of an- of one year would be good candidates for a test of the antagurans, these experiments would be far more practicai than a onistic pleiotropy hypothesis. As argued above, anuran evoselection exper&ent.
lution probably has been characterized by a genetic or develIstock (1984) postulated another resolution of Istock's opmental independence between stages. Such independence
paradox: persistent genetic variation in length of larvai pe- would allow divergence of stages and would allow each stage
riod could preserve a complex Me cycle. When ecological to adapt to different environments. If true, the antagonisfactors periodically favor lengthening the larvai period via tic pleiotropy hypothesis is unlikely to provide a resolution
fluctuating selection, genetic variation for the length of the to Istock's paradox. Viability selection acts on the larval
larvai period is maintained. If length of the adult stage is stage before viability selection or fecundity selection acts
inversely related to length of the lakal stage, then such selec- on the adult. Whether this could create a differential rate of
tion would concomitantly decrease the length of the adult adaptation in favor of the larval stage is unclear because
stage. Fluctuating selection might aiter the relative lengths such difficult models have not been constructed (Hartl and
of the two stanes. but neither stane would be eliminated if Clark 1989).
the larval period were periodicaiiy favored. Fluctuating selection is one factor that leads to the maintenance of genetic Experimental Approaches to the Evolution
variation (Hartl and Clark 1989), in this case for length
- of of the Complex Life Cycle
larval period.
~ h fluctuating-selection
e
explanation could be addressed Quantitative Genetics
first by surveying populations for genetic variation for A central characteristic of the anuran complex Me cycle is a
length of larval period. Such genetic variation has been phenotypic divergence between larval and postlarval stages.
found in some populations (Berven 1987; Blouin 1992b; I have argued that uncorrelated developmental programs are
Newman 1988b; P h c z et ai. 1984; Travis et ai. 1987). Sec- necessary for such divergence to have evolved. Support for
ond. the assum~tion
that the leneths of the larval and adult this hypothesis would be a quantitative genetic analysis that
I
periods are inversely related could be examined. Genetic cor- estimates no genetic correlations between a trait in the larval
i
294
REID N. HARRIS
stage and the same trait in the addt stage. An analysis of this
kind has not been performed, although genetic correlations
between larval iife-history traits and postlarval morphological traits have been estimated. Emerson et al. (1988) showed
that time to metamorphosis and growth rate of larvae were
not correlated with hind iimb shape of metamorphs, and
Blouin (1992b) demonstrated that growth rate of larvae was
not correlated with head width. These resdts suggest that
larval life-history traits and postlarval hind limb traits are
able to evolve independently. The generality of these resdts
require further study.
Estimations of the genetic correlation between values of
the same trait in larval and postlarval stages are avenues for
future study. One such trait is body shape in the tadpole and
in the metamorph. For example, if selection is imposed for
a narrower tadpole, will there also be a response to that selection in the postiarval stage? Lack of an additive genetic
correlation wodd suggest that independent evolution is
possible. Estimation of genetic correlations between traits
in larval and postlarval salamanders wodd be an interesting
companion study. I hypothesize that correlationsin salamanders wili be large, whde correlations in frogs will not be significant. If true, this wodd help to explain the far greater
phenotypic divergence between stages in anurans.
Lack of genetic correlations between stages wodd also
explain why paedomorphosis is cornmon in caudates and not
in anurans. The abiiity of a species to reproduce in a larval
morphology (paedomorphosis) is inversely related to the degree of phenotypic divergence between stages. A lack of
developmental flexibility (e.g., loss of possibility of paedomorphosis) has adverse macroevolutionary consequences
(higher extinction rates) in benthic marine invertebrates
(Valentine and Jablonski 1983). Such a pattern is unsnidied
in anurans.
Summary
The complex iife cycle of anurans is characterized by a phenotypic divergence between larval and postlarval stages. Selection for specialization of one stage in protoanurans may
have been accompanied by seleaion for uncoupling of traits
in the other stage. Genetic and developmentalindependente
is expected between stages that d o w independent evolution.-~irectdevelopmen; may have facilitated the origin of a
divergent complex life cycle by dowing greater initial addt
specialization. The divergent larval stage (tadpole) seems to
be specialized for growth. Adaptations that promote rapid
growth and provide an optirnal timing of metamorphosis are
expected and have been examined by many workers.
The evolutionary stability of a complex life cycle has been
questioned (Istock 1967), and several solutions have been
discussed. Once highly divergent life cycles evolve, elimination of the addt stage may be impossible without parthenogenesis. A parthengene;ic solu6on has been exiloited by
insect groups (H. F. Nijhout, personal cornrnunication) but
not by anurans. However, the relative lengths of the anuran
larva17andaddt stages can be adjusted. In Gurans, the length
of larval period is under genetic control, but genetic control
of addt longevity is unknown. By i d e n e i n g larval and
addt environments that d a e r in auaiitv. it shodd be DOSsible to test the hypothesis that le&h &f larval
has
been adjusted accordingly. For example, a consistentiy lush
larval habitat surrounded by a harsh terrestrial environment
wodd select for ~aedomorbhosisin saiamanders but codd
select for a long?arval period and short addt iife span in
frogs.
Further work is needed in several areas. Mor~hometric
and phylogenetic anaiyses are needed in a variety of species
An aiternative to the quantitative genetic methodology is to assess phenotypic correlations of traits across metamorrooted in descriptive histology and developmental biology. phosis. The case of Leiopelma is of particular interest in that
Using this approach, Aiberch (1987) identiied two devel- it is unclear if the earlysize-shape kajectory of the embryo
opmental pathways that led to the formation of the larval resembles a tadpole (fig. 11.2D), an ancestral salamanderand postlarval epibranchial in the saiamander Eulycea. The like larva (fig. 11.2C), or neither (fig. 11.2B). Quantitative
unique formation of the epibranchial cartilage during the genetic analises coupled with ecoGgical information are
embryonic and larval periods is a primitive pattern. During invaiuable for testing hypotheses about current seleaion
metamorphosis, larval chondrocytes can undergo ceii death on anurans. Such analyses aiso can test the hypothesis that
or remain static. The compartmentalization of the precur- tad~oieand addt traits are eeneticdv uncorrelated. Develsors to larval chondrocytes (neural crest cells) into prospec- opmental biology wili become increasingly important in
tive larval and addt ceiis is the derived pattern. Whde some addressing the general issue of uncoupling of iife-history
neural crest ceiis differentiate into the larval epibranchial, stages (Alberch 1987). The combination of morphological,
others remain quiescent. At metamorphosis, undifferenti- ge&ic, ecological, developmental, and phylo&netic apated cells develop into the postlarval epibranchial and the proaches surely wdi clarie our understanding of iife-history
larval chondrocytes die. The derived compartmentalized de- evolution in anurans.
velopment d o w s for independent evolution of larval and
postlarval stages.
Anurans also are expected to have compartmentalized de- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
velopmental programs (Aiberch 1987). The greater &ver- I thank R. Aiford, J. Hanken, S. Marks, and G. Wyngaard
gence between stages in anurans perhaps is explained by a for helpful comments on the manuscript. James Madison
greater number of compartmentalized developmemai path- University provided me with a research leave during which
ways. A research program involving the marking of larval I developed the ideas presented in this chapter.
V
DIVERSITY
Farnilial and Generic
Characterizations
Ronald Altig and Roy W. McDiarmid
Introduction
Orton (1953) clearly recognized the impedirnents that commoniy are encounteied w k n attemptGg to i d e n t q anuran
tadpoles. If it were oniy the inherent morphologicai traits
characteristic of the larvae of different species that were holding back our understanding of tadpole diversity, we would
have made considerable progress over the past 45 years. Unfortunately, the tadpoles of many species remain to be identified, and we have oniy meager understanding of the nature
of ontogenetic, geographic, &d metamorphc~variation(e.g.,
Cei and Crespo 1982; Goiiman and Goiiman 1991, 1995,
1996; Inger 1966; Korky and Webb 1996; L a d a 1984b;
J. M. Savage 1960). Our abiiity to recognize and identq
new forms progressively improves with each description,
but many factors, including a chronic lack of detail in many
descnptions, inadequate collections, and too few workers,
harnper progress. Intangible insights come from looking at
manY tad~olesof many s~ecies,and through such exPosure
one begins to develop an understanding of their morphologicai diversity. Having a readily available surnmary of the
known morphological diversity of tadpoles aiso would be
beneficiai. At times, interspecific variation seems to be slight
or absent; whether such Gariation simply is not recogni&d
(e.g., Bufo)or poorly understood (many taxa) remains to be
shown. Phenotypic plasticity, especiay of pigmentation and
fin shape, is confusing. Conspecific tadpoles collected from
turbid versus clear water vary tremendously in color, and
cultured tadpoles often have aberrant mouthparts compared
to wiid-caught individuais of the same species. Tadpoles of
the same siecies may dXer in shape in Still versus flowing
water (R. D. Jennings and Scott 1993; Van Dijk 1966), and
ontogenetic changes in color and oral morphology are occasionay profound. Improper fixation and storage (chap. 2)
tend to complicate a other issues. Examination of the sma,
complex oral apparatus of a tadpole provides the major characteristics for species identifications but often is fmtrating.
The discovery of a simple method for properly preserving a
tadpole with its oral disc wide open and without distortion
would facilitate consistent observations and be a major advance. In s ~ i t eof manv tzains. we sti find ourselves in the
realm of k e "prelimk& studyn mentioned by Orton
(1953).
Because research on tadpoles is increasing rapidly, the
need for properly identified tadpoles is becoming more common. Researchers are reaiizing that sampling tadpoles usuay is an efficient, viable means of assessing local biodiversi+. Tadpoles are present in aquatic hab:itats for longer
periods than breeding adults and are often more easily collected. H . B. ShafFer et ai. (1994) presented useful ideas in
296
R O N A L D ALTIG A N D ROY W. M c D I A R M I D
boundaries that typicdy coincide with the phylogenetic patterns derived from aduit frogs, but the extremes in ecologicai and morphologicai diversity among anuran larvae (figs.
12.1-12.2) seem truiy astounding. Some of this diversity is
captured in the composite of microhabitats and morphoTable 12.1 Guide to select literature on tadpole faunas and regional
treatments of groups. Referentes with keys are indicated with
asterisks.
Europe
General: Boulenger 1892*, E. N. Arnold and Burton 1985*, Nollert and Nollert 1992*, Berninghausen 1997"
Austria: Grillitsch et al. 1983*, Lower Austria
Belgium: De Witte 1948*
France: Ame1 1946*
Germany: gerninghausen 1994*, Brauer 1961*, Engermann et al.
1993"
Italy: Lanza 1983*
Portugal: Serra and Aibuguerque 1963*
Russia: Terent'ev and Chernov 1965"
Spain: Salvador 1985+
Turkey: Basoglu and Ozeti 1973
Africa
East f i c a : Schiotz 1975, hyperoliids
South Africa: Van Dijk 1966*, Wager 1986
West Africa: Rode1 1996, Schiotz 1967, hyperoliids
Cameroon: Mertens 1938
Madagascar: Blommers-Sdilosserand Blanc 1991, Glaw and Vences
1992*
Natal: Lambiris 1988aX,b*
Zimbabwe: Lambiris 1989*
Asia
Southeast Asia; Bourret 1942*
Borneo: Inger 1966*, 1985*
China: C.-C. Liu 1940, 1950
Japan: Okada 1931, Maeda and Matsui 1989
Java: Schijfsma 1932
Malaysia: Berry 1972
Pakistan: Khan 1982aX
Philippines: Inger 1954
Russia: Terent'ev and Chemov 1965*
Taiwan: Chou and L i 1997"
Thailand: M. A. Smith 1916a, 1917
Australia/New Guinea
Australia: Watson and Martin 1973, Tyler 1989*; Queensland:
Retallick and Hero 1988*, rainforest streams in one area
North America
Canada: Orton 1952*, genera, Aitig 1970*; British Columbia:
Corkran and Thoms 1996"; Aiberta: A. P. Russell and Bauer
1993"
United States: Orton 1952*, genera, Aitig 1970", Wright 1929*;
Eastern United States: A. H. Wright and Wright 1949*; Florida:
Fanning 1966*, Stevenson 1976*; Louisiana: Siekmann 1949*;
North Carolina: Travis 1981ar; Oregon: Corkran and Thoms
1996"; Washington: Corkran and Thoms 1996*
Middle America
General: Dueilman 1970, hylids
Costa Rica: J. M. Savage 1968*, dendrobatids; 1980ar, Lips and
Savage 1996"
Honduras: L. D. Wiison and McCranie 1993*
Mexico: Aitig and Brandon 1971", genera, Aitig 1987"
Panama: J. M. Savage 1968*, dendrobatids
South America
Argentina: Cei 1980, 1987; Kehr and Wfiarns 1990
Brazil: Hero 1990*, Manaus; Heyer et al. 1990, Boracia
Chile: Cei 1962
Ecuador: Dueilman 1978*, Santa Cecilia/pper Arnazon Basin
DIVERSITY
297
Bufo campons
Korky and Webb 1973
Chinjcalw vittatus
Pope 1931
Chimmantisnrfeswns
Guib and Lamotte 1958
Colostethushaydeeae
Rivero 1976
Colostethw subpunctatus
Cei and Roig 1961
Gephyromuntis methueni
Razariheiisoa 1973b
HetenXdus amoulti
Razarihelisoa 1979
H-vhloyuaxa
Duellman 1970
Hyh siopeh
Caldweii 1974
Hyh sp.
Stuart 1948
Hyperoliuspicturatus
Ai111931
Kivsina sengaiensis
Lamotte and Zuber-Vogeli
1956
Leptobrachium hmelti
Wassersug 1980
Leptobrachiumgracili~raciliP
Inger 1966
Mantuictylus alutus
Arnoult and Razarihelisoa
1967
Manttdactylus brevipalmatus
Razarihelisoa 1973a
Mantidaqlus ulce-rosus
Razariheiisoa 1969
Nyctimystes montana
H. W. Parker 1936
?-Tvmmmystes
duyi
Czechura et al. 1987
Microhyh bmeensis
H. W. Parker 1934
Otophlyne robusta
Wassersug and Pyburn 1987
Paratelmatobiw lutzi
Heyer 1976b
Corrected Identification
Citation
Bufo mucromistatus
Mendelson 1997
ChinXal1*rdonae
Heyer 1971
Phlyctr'mantU ieonardi
Schietz 1975
HyhpWdaqh
La Marca 1985
Colostethussemiguttata
J. Faivovich, personal
communication
Manttdactylus bicaisuratus
Blommers-Schiosser and
Blanc 1991
HeteruCdus betsileo
Blommers-Schlosser 1982
Unidentified Rana
R. Altig, personal observation
Hyh whta
Toal and Mendelson 1995
Piemhvh teuchestes
~ u e h a and
n Campbeii
1992
Rana albolab*
Schietz 1967
Kivsina macuhta
Schietz 1967
Leptobrachium hendhcbsonii
Inger 1983
Leptobrachella mjobergi
Inger 1983
Heterklw betsibo
Blommers-Schiosser 1979a
Mantdmtylw aenrmnalir
Blommers-Schiosser and
Blanc 1991
Manttdactylw curtus
Blommers-Schiosser 1979a
Nym'mystes cheesmanae
Davies and Richards 1990
Litoria nyakaiensis
S. J. Richard~1992
Kalophlynus sp.
Inger 1966
0tophynepyburn.i
Campbeii and Clarke 1998
Unknown
W. R. Heyer, personal
communication
Nyctib&acbuspygraciliPmaeus
Piai 1978
Probably Ranapipiens
R Altig, personal observation
Rana@eri
R. Altig, personai obse~ation
Ptychadena anchietae
Van Dijk 1966
Unknown
Inger 1966
Unknown
Inger 1966
(continued)
298
Rana [= Limnanectes]w o d a n
Inger 1956
Rana microdiscapalavanensis
Inger 1956
Rana nicobariensis
M. A. Smith 1930
Ranapleske6
Annandale 1917
Rena vertebral&
Hewitt 1927
Rhacophorzls leucomystm
Inger 1956
Staurois natatm
Mocquard 1890
Staurois latopalmatus
Inger 1966
Rhqhoncs bimacuiuta
Inger 1985
Limnanectes microdisca
Inger 1966
Limrumectesparamurodon
Inger 1966
Unknown
Inger 1966
Perhaps Scutiger naumnauta
Boulenger 1919
Rana umbraculata
Van Dijk 1966
Polypedutes m m ~
Inger 1966
Unknown
Inger 1966
R h q h w w bimaculatus
Inger 1985
Rhqhwusgauni
Inger and Tan 1990
Amo@ sp. A
Inger 1966
Amo@ sp. B
Inger 1966
Rhqhorus sp. B
Inger 1966
Unknown
Pyburn 1980
Unknown hylid
Stuart 1948
Unknown
E. H. Taylor 1942
Unknown
Inger and Wassersug 1990
Merktgenysphaeomms
Inger and Gritis 1983
Me&o~enyspoecilus
Inger and Gritis 1983
Rana luctuosa
Inger 1985
Otophynepybumi
Wassersug and Pyburn 1987
Rana maculata
Hiis and De S 1988
Rhinophrynw h a l &
Orton 1943
Staurolc natatm
Inger and Tan 1990
Fig. 12.1. Representative body shapes and fin configurations among anuran tadpoles. (A) Ranupalmipes (Ranidae, dasping). (B) Mgophys m t a n u (Megophryidae, neustonic). ( C )S c i m mbulosa (Hylidae, nektonic). ( D )Hyh vimduris
(Hyiidae, suctorial). (E) Atclopw &nesm (Bufonidae, gaswmyzophorous). (F) Coiustcth nubicoh (Dendrobatidae,
neustonic). ( G )Thmopapmopolitana (Leptodactylidae,semitemesmal). (H) LeptopclU byluih (Hyperoiiidae, benthic).
(I) Hyh b?vmeliaiu (Hyiidae, arboreal Type 1. (J) Gashvphynecuwli&
(Microhyiidae, suspension feeder). (K) Hyh
nrinocephala (Hyiidae, macrophagous). ( L )Oudmy~aLISrna(Ranidae, macrophagous). (M) Hyh li&
(Hylidae, suctorial). (N) DucUinamclyh ummchvoa (Hylidae, adherent). (0)CochvamUap$thsi (Centrolenidae, fossoriai) ( P ) Anothea
pinosa (Hylidae, arboreai Type 2). (Q) Cmaqhrys m u t a (Leptodactyiidae, camivorous Type 1). (R) Sttphop&amclr
(Bufonidae, arboreai Type 3). From Altig and Johnston (1989), after Dueiiman and Tmeb (1986); original drawings by
and Tmeb.
L i d a Tmeb. Reprinted by permission of HevpetoIo~gicalMm~raphs
Fig. 12.2. Representative configurations of the oral apparatus among anuran tadpoles. (A) Ranapulrn*
(Ranidae, dasping), (B)Megopby muntuna (Megophryidae, neustonic), (C) Hyla riarlarLr (Hylidae, suctorial), (D)Atehpa & n e s m (Bufonidae, gastromyzophorous), (E) Hyla micmcephaia
(Hylidae, macrophagous), (F) Cem&phtys m u t a (Leptodactylidae, camivorous Type l), (G) Hyla
l i h (Hylidae, suctorial), and (H) DueUmumbh uranucbroa (Hylidae, adherent). From Altig and
Johnston (1989) after D u e b a n and Trueb (1986); original drawings by L i d a Trueb. Reprinted by
permission of H"pctob@ulMmpphs and Trueb.
DIVERSITY
301
Trichobatrachus
Ascaphus
RFcaphus: CO: 1. GR: northwestern United States-adjacent Canada. CI: Altig (1970);
H. A. Brown (1990a); Metter (1964, 1967); Stebbins (1985).
Bombina
Ansonia
BUFONIDAE: CO: 331381. GR: widespread except Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
benthic; lotic: benthic, suaorial, gastromyzophorous; endotroph. LTRF: 2/3,2(2)/3, 2(2)/
3(1), 2(2)/2. OA: typical: anteroventral, rarely ventral and suaorial. MP: wide dorsal and
ventral gaps, complete: uni- and biserial, wide dorsal gap only. DEM: lateral, absent. NA:
often large, often not round and with mediai papilla, sometimes smaii and rounded, doser to
eye than snout or reverse. VT: mediai, dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: usuaiiy narrow
and broadly arched. LJ: usuaiiy narrow and broadly V-shaped. DE: low, originates near or
posterior to dorsal td-body junction, tip round to slightly pointed. BS: oval to roundldepressed. CP: typicaiiy uniformiy black; td muscle sometimes bicolored or banded. TL:
1540136.
Ahiphlynoides: CO: 1. GR: Ethiopia. EMG: endotroph.
Andinophlyne: CO: 3. GR: Ecuador-Colombia. EMG: endotroph.
Ansonia: CO: 19. GR: India-Borneo-Philippines. EMG: exotroph: lotic: clasping, suctorial, gastromyzophorous. LTRP: 213. OA: typical: ventral. MP: smaii, with medium
to wide dorsal gap, complete: uniserial. SUP: row(s) distal to P-3, few lateraiiy. DEM:
lateral, absent. NA: smaii, nearer eyes than snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: narrow to medium, divided, absent. LJ:narrow, very open V-shaped. DE: low, originates on t d muscle or near dorsal taii-body junction, tip bluntiy pointed. BS: ovalldepressed. CP: uniformiy dark, with rniddorsal stripe. TL: 18-35/36. NO: large variations
in oral morphology within genus; anterolaterai terrninus of abdominal sucker of A.
"sucker" of Inger (1992a) has fingerlike projection. CI: Inger (1966, 1985, 1992a).
Atelophlyniscus: CO: 1. GR: Honduras. EMG: exotroph: lotic: gastromyzophorous.
LTRP: 213. OA: typid: ventral. MP: wide dorsal and smaiier ventral gaps: uniserial
ventraiiy, biserial dorsally. SUP: few anterolateraiiy. DEM: absent. NA: s m d , nearer eye
than snout. VT: medial, not attached to ventral fin. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow,
without serrations, V-shaped. LJ: narrow, V-shaped. DF: low, originates slightly posterior
to dorsal taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval to round/depressed. CP: black t d
muscle boldly banded; other white marks on body. TL: 26/37. NO: ventral fin originates
on t d muscle; resembles tadpoles ofAtelupus. CI: McCranie et al. (1989).
Atelopus: CO: 50. GR: Costa Rica-Bolivia. EMG: exotroph: lotic: gastromyzophorous.
LTRF: 213. OA: typid: ventral. MP: wide ventral gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM:
lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow,
smooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near or slightly distal to
dorsal td-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval to round/depressed. CP: uniformiy
black, may have white blotches or bands on t d . TL: 15-20136. CI: Duellman and Lynch
(1969); Gascon (1989a); Lidquist and Hetherington (1988); J. D. Lynch (1986); Starrett (1967).
Bufi: CO: 217. GR: widespread. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic; lotic: benthic, suaorial, gastromyzophorous; endotroph. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1), 2(2)/3,2/3,2(2)/2(1). Ok. typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal and ventral gaps, complete: uniserial. SUP: few
lateraiiy, absent. DEM: lateral, absent. NA: large and usuaiiy not round, often with me-
DIVERSITY
diai papdla. VT: mediai, dextrai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow, smooth arc, angled
lateraiiy. LJ: narrow, open V-shaped. DE: low, originates at dorsai td-body junction, tip
rounded. BS: ovai-round/depressed. CP: typicaiiy uniformly black, tail muscle sometimes
bicolored or banded. TL: 15-35/36. NO: smaii size is cornrnon; morphologicaliy conservative and species characteristics poorly docurnented; no consistently recognized morphologicai dserences among numerous species groups except in debilis group; Crump
(1989b) reported facultative endotrophy in B.pm$enes. CI: Altig (1970); Berry (1972);
McDiarmid and Altig (1990); Zweifel (1970).
Bufoides: CO: 1. GR: hdia. Tadpole unknown; see Piai and Yazdani (1973).
Capensibufo: CO: 2. GR: southwestern South Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRP: 2(2)/3. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and ventral gaps: uniserial.
SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: large, nearer eye than snout. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai.
SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, broad mediai convexity. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DE:
low, originates at dorsai taii-body junction, tip round. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly
dark. TL: 35/36. CI: Power and Rose (1929); Wager (1986).
Crepzdophryne: CO: 1. GR: Costa Rica. Unknown developmentai trajectory.
Dendruphryniscus: CO: 3. GR: Ecuador-Pem-Guianas-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
benthic, arboreal. LTRF: 213, 2(2)/3. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and
ventral gaps: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: laterai. NA: large, nearer eye than snout.
VT: medial. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, angled at dorsolaterai points. LJ:
medium, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates at dorsai td-body junction, tip rounded.
BS: ovai/depressed. CP: untformly dark. TL: 10-13136. CI: Izecksohn and Da Cmz
(1972).
Didynamipus: CO: 1. GR: Cameroon. EMG: endotroph.
Frostt'us: CO: 1. GR: Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Laurentuphyne: CO: 1. GR: Zaire. EMG: endotroph.
Leptupbryne: CO: 2. GR: Maiaysia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRP: 2(1-2)/3.
OA: typical: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral.
NA: large like Bufo and equidistant between eye and snout. VT: mediai. EP: dorsal. SP:
sinistrai. UJ: narrow, smooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates at
dorsai tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly black. TL: 151
34. NO: lack of gap in marginai papiae of lower labium is unusual. CI: Berry (1972);
Inger (1985).
Melanupbyniscus: CO: 11. GR: Brazil-Paraguay-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
benthic. LTRF: 2/3[1]. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and ventrai gaps:
uniserial. SUP: absent, few lateraiiy. DEM: laterai, absent. NA: nearer eye than snout.
VT: mediai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai. UJ: mediurn, smooth arc, coarsely serrate. LJ:
medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai td-body junction, tip round.
BS: ovai/depressed. CP: umformly dark, tad muscle bicolored, fins speckled. TL: 19/36.
NO: figure in Prigioni and Arrieta (1992) shows laterai gaps in marginal papiae. CI:
Prigioni and Langone (1990); Starrett (1967).
Mertensuphryne: CO: 2. GR: Zaire-Tanzania. EMG: exotroph: arboreal. LTRF: 112.
OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: laterai.
NA: nearer snout than eye, withm the fleshy, hoiiow "crown" that encircles the eyes and
nares. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, almost straight edge, coarsely
serrate. LJ: similar to upper sheath. DE: low, originates near dorsal td-body junaion,
tip broadly rounded. BS: oblong/depressed. CP: unrformly and lightly pigmented. TL:
13/30. NO: see Stephupaedes. CCI: Grandison (1980).
Metaphryniscus: CO: 1. GR: Venezuela. EMG: endotroph.
Nectophryne: CO: 2. GR: Cameroon-Zaire. EMG: endotroph.
Nectuphrynotdes: CO: 5. GR: Tanzania. EMG: endotroph.
Nimbaphymides: CO: 2 . GR: Liberia-Ivory Coast. EMG: endotroph.
Oreuphrynella: CO: 6. GR: Venezuela-Guyana-Brazil. EMG: endotroph. CI: McDiarmid and Gorzula (1989).
Osmnophryne: CO: 5. GR: Colombia-Ecuador. EMG: endotroph.
Pedostipes: CO: 6. GR: hdia-Borneo. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/
3(1). OA: typicai: ventrai. MP: wide dorsai and ventrai gaps: blunt and uniserial. SUP:
absent. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: mediai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
pjOPhtyne
Schismudenna
Stephopaees
w
e
m
n
z
a
Cochranella
UJ: medium, smooth arc, coarsely serrate. LJ: medium, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai td-body junction, tip round. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark.
TL: 16/36. CI: Inger (1966, 1985).
Pelophvyne: CO: 7. GR: Philippines-China. EMG: endotroph.
PeltcIphvyne: CO: 9. GR: Greater Anties. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/
3, 212. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and ventral gaps: uniserial. SUP:
row lateral to lower tooth rows. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: mediai.
EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, smooth arc with slight mediai indentation. LJ:
medium, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip rounded.
BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 2 1/36. CI: Ruiz Garcia (1980).
Pseuubufo: CO: 1. GR: Borneo. Tadpole unknown.
Rhamphqhvyne: CO: 9. GR: Panama-Peru. EMG: endotroph.
Schismaema: CO: 1. GR: Tanzania-Zaire-South Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic. LTRP: 213. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and ventral gaps: s m d
and uniseriai. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP:
dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, long low convexity in margin; Wager (1986): upper
sheath lacks serrations. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsai t d body junction, tip rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 35/36. NO:
unique semicircular flap across body b e h d eyes; commonly schools in midwater/surface
at least during the day. CI: Wager (1986).
Spinophvynoihs: CO: 1. GR: Ethiopia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3.
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and ventral gaps: uniseriai. SUP: -. DEM:
-. NA: -. VT: -. EP: -. SP: -. UJ: -. LJ: -. DE: -. BS: -. CP: -. TL: -. CI: Grandison
(1978); M. H. Wake (1980).
Stephqaehs: CO: 2. GR: Tanzania-Mozambique. EMG: exotroph: arboreal. LTRF:
2(2)/2. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial, some appear
branched and s m d gaps between papdiae. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye
than snout. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, edge nearly straight. LJ:
absent or not keratinized. DE: low, originates near dorsai td-body junction, siight arc
about midiength, tip broadiy rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly paie. TL: 201
37. NO: fleshy "crown" encircles nares and eyes; see MertenscIphvym. CI: Channing
(1978, 1993).
Tmebella: CO: 2. GR: Peru. EMG: endotroph. CI: Graybeal and Cannatella (1995).
Werneria: CO: 4. GR: Togo-Cameroon. EMG: exotroph: lotic: suaorial. LTRP: 213.
OA: typicai: ventral, suaoriai. MP: wide dorsai gap: biseriai. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral.
NA: s m d , nearer snout than eyes. VT: medial. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: narrow.
LJ: narrow, open V-shaped. DE: low, originates at dorsai td-body junction. BS: oval/
depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 27/36. CI: Mertens (1938); Perret (1966).
Wolterstorffina:CO: 2. GR: Cameroon-Nigeria. EMG: endotroph.
CENTROLENIDAE: CO: 31103. GR: Mexico-Brazil-Boiivia. NO: generic and specific
drfferences poorly known.
Centrolene: CO: 33. GR: Honduras-Peni-Venezuela. EMG: exotroph: lotic: burrower.
LTRF: 5 213. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniierial. SUP: absent.
DEM: lateral. NA: s m d , about equidistant between eye and snout. VT: medial, dextrai.
EP: dorsal: tiny and near sagittal line. SP: sinistrai. UJ: narrow to medium, smooth arc,
sometimes coarsely serrate. LJ: narrow to medium, U- or V-shaped. DE: low, originates
on t d muscle to near td-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/strongly depressed. CP:
reddish in iife because of skin vascularization, uniformly tan in preservative. TL: 40-501
36. CI: J. D. Lynch et ai. (1983); Mijares-Urrutia (1990).
Cochranella: CO: 44. GR: Nicaragua-Bolivia-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lotic: burrower.
LTRF: 5 213. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent.
DEM: lateral. NA: s m d , about equidistant between eye and snout. VT: medial, dextrai.
EP: dorsai: tiny and near sagittai luie. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to medium, smooth arc,
sometimes coarsely serrate. LJ: narrow to medium, U- or V-shaped. DE: low, originates
on t d muscle to near td-body junction, tip rounded. BS: ovai/strongly depressed. CP:
reddish in iife because of skin vascularization, uniformly tan in preservative. TL: 40-501
36. CI: Duellman (1978).
DIVERSITY
Hyalimbatrachzztm: CO: 26. GR: Mexico-Bolivia-Tobago-Guyana-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lotic: burrower. LTRF: 5 213. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap:
uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: small, about equidistant between eye and
snout. VT: medial, dextral. EP: dorsal: tiny and near sagittal line. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to medium, smooth arc, sometimes coarsely serrate. LJ: narrow to medium, U- or
V-shaped. DF: low, originates on taii muscle to near taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS:
oval/strongly depressed. CP: reddish in Me because of skin vascularization,uniformiy tan
in preservative. TL: 40-50136. CI: Duellman (1978); Heyer (1985).
DENDROBATIDAE: CO: 81164. GR: Nicaragua-Bolivia-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
benthic, arboreal; lotic: benthic, neustonic; endotroph. LTRF: number of variations from O/
O to 213. OA: typical: anteroventral, terminal, umbelliform. MP: medium to wide dorsal gap:
uni- and biserial. SUP: few lateral, absent. DEM: lateral, absent. NA: nearer eye than snout
or reverse. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to wide, smooth arc. LJ: narrow to wide, Uor V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip rounded to slightly
pointed. BS: oval to rounded/depressed. CP: uniform or muted variations. TL: 12-68/36.
NO: generic and specific differences poorly understood.
Aromobates: CO: 1. GR: Venezuela. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial on upper labium, biserial on
lower labium. SUP: few ventrolaterally. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT:
dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: massive, finely serrated edge a uniform arc. LJ:
large, moderately V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip
rounded. BS: globular/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL: 68/37. CI: Myers et al.
(1991).
Colostethus:CO: 85. GR: Costa Rica-Peru-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreal, neustonic; lotic: neustonic; endotroph. LTRF: 2(2)/3[1], 212, 010. OA: typical:
anteroventral,umbehform, largely absent in endotrophs. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: row throughout extent of marginal papiiiae, absent, few laterally and distal
to P-3. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: medium to wide, smooth arc. LJ: medium to wide, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: muted tones,
dark line from nostril to snout common. TL: 15-30136. NO: C. nubicola group has
umbelliform oral disc and jaw sheaths but no labial teeth. CI: Kaiser and Altig (1994);
Lescure (1984); J. M. Savage (1968).
Dendrobates: CO: 26. GR: Nicaragua-Peru-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreal. LTRF: 1/1,2(2)/3[1]. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial, sometimes narrow ventral gap. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than
eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: mediun~to very wide, smooth arc. LJ:
medium to wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip
rounded to slightly pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform and muted variations. TL:
15-25/36. CI: J. M. Savage (1968); Silverstone (1975).
Epipedubates: CO: 24. GR: northern South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic,
arboreal. LTRF: 2(2)/3[1-21. OA: typical: anteroventral.MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial.
SUP: few laterally, absent. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP:
dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to medium, smooth arc. LJ: narrow to medium, open
U-shaped. D E low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: u d o r m and muted variations. TL: 15-20136. CI: J. M. Savage (1968);
Silverstone (1975).
Mannophryne: CO: 9. GR: Venezuela-Tobago. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreal. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreal, neustonic; lotic: neustonic; endotroph.
LTRF: 2(2)/3[1], 212, 010. OA: typical: anteroventral, umbelhform, largely absent in
endotrophs. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: row throughout extent of marginal papillae, absent, few laterally and distal to P-3. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than
snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium to wide, smooth arc. LJ: medium to wide, open V-shaped. D E low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip
rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: muted tones, dark h e from nostril to snout common
TL: 15-30136. NO: see Colostethus. CI: J. R. Dixon and Rivero-Blanco (1985).
Minyobates: CO: 9. GR: Venezuela-Ecuador. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
tnnitatU
Colostethw; C.fitatw
Dendrobates
2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM:
absent, lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: rnedial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ:
wide, srnooth arc. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsai td-body
junction, tip rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 12-18/36. CI: J. M.
Savage (1968); Silverstone (1975).
Nephalobates: CO: 5. G R Venezuela. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3.
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent,
lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: rnediai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide,
srnooth arc. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction,
tip rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 12-18/36. NO: forrner Colostethus albogztlaris group. CI: La Marca and Mijares-U (1988).
Phyllobates: CO: 5. G R Costa Rica-Colornbia. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF:
2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsal gap: uni- and biserial. SUP: absent.
DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: rnediai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ:
wide, srnooth arc. LJ: wide, open V-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsai td-body
junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniforrnly dark. TL: 15-25/36. CI: Donnelly et ai. (1990b); Lescure (1976); J. M. Savage (1968).
DISCOGLOSSIDAE: CO: 219. G R Europe. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2/3(1), biserial. OA: typical: anteroventrai. MP: complete: uniseriai. SUP: absent. DEM:
lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: rnediai. EP: dorsai. SP: low on lefi side. UJ: narrow,
srnooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction,
tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: chainlike melanophore pattern in skin. TL: 3555/36.
Alytes: CO: 4. G R Europe. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2/3(1), biserial.
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: complete: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA:
nearer snout than eye. VT: rnedial. EP: dorsai. SP: low on lefi side. UJ: narrow, smooth
arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip
rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: chainlike rnelanophore pattem in skin. TL: 35-55/36.
CI: Bouienger (1892); Lanza (1983).
Dism~lossus:CO: 5. G R Europe-Syria. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2/3(1),
biserial. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: crnplete: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral.
NA. nearer snout than eye. VT: rnedial. EP: dorsai. SP: low on lefi side. UJ: narrow,
srnooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded: BS: oval/depressed. CP: chadke rnelanophore pattern in skin. TL:
35-55/36. CI: Bouienger (1892); Lanza (1983).
HELEOPHRYNIDAE: CO: 115. G R South Afi-ica. EMG: exotroph: lotic: suctorial.
LTRF: 4114-15(1). OA: typicai: ventral, upper jaw sheath absent, sometimes lower also.
MP: complete: biserial. SUP: rows below distai rnost lower row. DEM: absent. NA: equidistant between eye and snout, slightly tubuiar. VT: rnedial. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: absent.
LJ: when present: rnedium, open V-shaped. DE: low, originates on taii rnuscle, tip rounded.
BS: oblong/depressed. CP: rock/lichenlike rnottiing, yeiiow/gold ofien in background color
in life. TL: 50-85/36. NO: fewer than 14 tooth rows on lower labium common; hypertrophed, isolated jaw serrations in the position of jaw sheaths of srnd tadpoles are soon lost
(Visser 1985); large subbranchial rnuscle present ventrolaterdy along anterior two-thirds of
body gives ventrai silhouette a distinaive shape.
Heleophyne: CO: 5. CI: Channing (1984); Channing et ai. (1988); Van Dijk (1966).
HEMISOTIDAE: CO: 118. G R sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic.
LTRP: 5(3-5)/4(1), 6(3-6)/3. OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap: uni- and
biseriai, some ventrai papiae exceedingly long. SUP: absent, few laterally. DEM: absent.
NA: srnd, doser to snout than eye. VT: dextrai. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: rnedium to
wide, strong rnedial convexity. LJ: rnedium, open U-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal
taii-body junaion, tip pointed. BS: ovai/cornpressed. CP: stripes on taii, distal thrd dark,
basai conneaive tissue sheath visible. TL: 40-60136.
Hemks: CO: 8. CI: Lambiris (1988a, b); Van Dijk (1966); Wager (1986).
HYLIDAE: CO: 411743. GR: Holaraic-Neotropic-Australopapua. EMG: exotroph: lentic: severai guilds; lotic: several guilds; endotroph. LTRF: rnany variations between 010 and
DIVERSITY
17/21. OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral, terminal. MP: dorsal gap, complete, dorsal and
ventral gaps: variable, ofien bi- or multiserial. SUP: highly variable. DEM: absent, lateral.
NA: round, variable in size, closer to snout than eye or reverse, ofien rimrned and countersunk. VT: dextrai, mediai. EP: lateral, dorsai. SP: sinistral, low on lefi side, ventral. LJ:
highiy variable. DE: highiy variable. BS: oval to oblong/depressed, equidimensional and compressed. CP: highiy variable. TL: 20-60136. NO: marginal papiiiae always smder and more
densely arranged than ranids, the most commonly confused taxa; few taxa with 1-3 anterior
rows with medial gaps distal to nonbroken rows.
Hemiphractinae: CO: 5/64. GR: Panama-South America.
Cryptoba~rachus:CO: 3. GR: Colombia. EMG: endotroph.
Fhctonotus: CO: 5. GR: Brazil-Venezuela-Trinidad. EMG: endotroph; exotroph: arboreal. LTRF: 010. OA: typical but lacking labial teeth; anteroventral. MP: dorsal gap:
uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: ventral. UJ: medium, wide arc. LJ: narrow, wide U-shaped. DE: low, originates
near dorsal td-body junction, tip round. BS: oblong/depressed. CP: iightly pigmented.
TI,: 18/31. NO: exotrophic larvae are morphologicdy similar to those of nidicolous
endotrophs. CI: Dueliman and Gray (1983); Heyer et al. (1990); and Weygoldt (1989).
Gastrotheca: CO: 44. GR: Panama-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic; endotroph.
LTRF: 2(2)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP:
ventrolaterdy. DEM: absent. NA: equidistant between snout and eye. VT: dextral. EP:
dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: wide, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy
dark. TL: 40-60136. CI: Wassersug and Dueliman (1984).
Hemiphractus: CO: 5. GR: Panama-Bolivia. EMG: endotroph.
Stgrania: CO: 7. GR: Venezuela-Guyana. EMG: endotroph.
Hylinae: CO: 26/488. GR: Eurasia and North, Central, and South America.
A h s : CO: 2. GR: eastern North America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRP: 2(2)/
2. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few laterdy. DEM:
absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium,
wide smooth arc. LJ: medium, U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: dorsum of t d muscle banded; taii tip usudy
black. TL: 40-50136. NO: spiracular tube long. CI: Altig (1970); Orton (1952); A. H .
Wright and Wright (1949).
Anotheca: CO: 1. GR: Mexico-Panama. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreal. LTRF: 2(2)/
2. OA: typical: nearly terminal. MP: complete: uniserial. SUP: few laterdy. DEM: absent. NA: about equidistant between snout and eye. VT: d m a l . EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, long shdow arc, finely serrate. LJ: wide, open V-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: ovalJdepressed. CP: uniformiy
purpiish brown. TI,: 45/38. NO: gut not coiled. CI: Robinson (1961); E. H . Taylor
(1954).
Apa~mphenodon:CO: 2. GR: Brazil-Venezuela. EMG: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(1)/56(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: mdtiserial. SUP: s m d group
ventrolaterdy. DEM: absent. NA: -. VT: mediai. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: -. LJ:
-. DF: low, originates anterior to the dorsal td-body junction, tip pointed. BS: ovoid in
dorsal view. CP: dark brown with irregular dark spots; taii muscle banded dorsdy. TL:
47/36. CI: H. R. de Silva (personal communication).
Aplastodiscus: CO: 1. GR: Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/4(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium,
straight medial edge. LJ:medum, U-shaped. DE: low, originates at dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: distal one-third of taii darkened; anterior part
of t d muscle with lateral stripe. TL: 68/38. CI: Caramaschi et al. (1980).
Argenteohyu: CO: 1. GR: Argentina-Paraguay. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2(2)/4(1). OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: absent.
DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ:
medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open V-shaped. DF: somewhat arched, originates
on body, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy brown. TL: 42/31. CI: De
S (1983).
Ami~
Duellmanohyla
Hyla; H. bromeliacia
Hyia; H. picadoi
Hyia; H. sarayauensiJ
Hyla; H. armata
Cal'tahyh: CO: 1. GR: Jamaica. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreal. LTRP: 110. OA:
typical: anteroventral.MP: narrow dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: throughout lower labium.
DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ:
medium, serrated edge a smooth arc. LJ: medium, open V-shaped. DF: somewhat
arched, originates on body, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly brown. TL:
42/31. CI: E. R. Dunn (1926).
Cmythomantis: CO: 1. GR: Brazii. Tadpole unknown.
Duellmanohyh: CO: 8. GR: Mexico-Costa Rica. EMG: exotroph: lotic: adherent.
LTRF: 3(1,3)/3[1], 2(2)/3,2(2)/2. OA: typical: ventral. MP: complete: small and uniseriai. SUP: scattered throughout disc. DEM: midventral. NA: small, nearer snout than
eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, coarsely serrate, srnooth arc to
slightly indented medially. LJ: medium, coarsely serrate, V-shaped. DF: low, originates
near dorsal tail-body junaion, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: largely brown, some
rnotthg on tail. TL: 33/26. NO: tooth rows much shorter than transverse diameter of
oral disc. CI: J. A. CampbeU and Srnith (1992); D u e h a n (1970).
Hyh: CO: 289. GR: North, Central and South America-Eurasia. EMG: exotroph: lotic:
arboreal, benthic, adherent, clasping, suctorial; lentic: benthic, nektonic, arboreal.
LTRF: many variations between 010 and 17/21; 2/3 most comrnon. OA: typical: terminal, anteroventral,ventral; reduced to various degrees. MP: dorsal gap, dorsal and ventral
gaps: uni-, bi-, and multiserial. SUP: few to many laterally, distinct rows above upper
and below lower tooth rows, absent. DEM: absent. NA: variou positions. VT: dextral,
rnedial. EP: dorsal, lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: many variations. LJ: many variations. DF:
very low to very high, originates anterior to, near (most cornmon), or posterior to dorsai
taii-body junaion, tip pointed to round. BS: oval to oblong/depressed, cornpressed or
equidimensional. CP: variable. TL: 20-60/36. NO: a number of species groups have
distinaive rnorphologies. CI: Caldweli (1974); D u e h a n (1970, 1978); Duellman and
Altig (1978); Duellman and Fouquette (1968); D u e h a n and Tmeb (1989); Peixoto
and Da Cmz (1983); J. M. Savage (1980b).
Nyctimuntis: CO: 1. GR: Ecuador. Tadpole unknown.
Osteocephalus: CO: 14. GR: Guianas-Venezuela-Amazon Basin-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreal. LTRF: 2(2)/5(1), 3(2-5)/5(1). OA: typical: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: few laterally. DEM: absent. NA: equidistant
between eye and snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow, wide smooth
arc. LJ: narrow, V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junaion, tip
rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 49/37. CI: Duellman (1978);
Duellman and Lescure (1973); Tmeb and Duellman (1970).
Osteopilus: CO: 3. GR: Greater Antiiies-Florida. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreal. LTRF: 2(2)/4(1). OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral. MP: dorsal gap: uniserial.
SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai, rnedial. EP: lateral,
dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, edge forms smooth arc. LJ: medium, deep rnedial
indentation. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junaion, tip slightly pointed. BS:
oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark or pale. TL: 37/41. CI: Duellman and Schwar~
(1958); Lannoo et al. (1987).
Phtynohyas: CO: 5. GR: Mexico-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic, benthic,
arboreal. LTRF: 4(1-2,4)/6(1), 3(1,3)/5(1),2(2)/4[1]. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP:
rnedium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: few ventrolaterally. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye
than snout. VT: rnedial. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, edge describes a smooth
arc, coarsely serrate. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: rnedium, originates on body, tip
pointed. BS: oval/compressed. CP: taii rnucle striped. TL: 30-38/36. NO: unusual
LTRF shared with TrachcephczLs;Pyburn (1967) shows a rnedial constriaion in the upper
jaw sheath; Zweifel (1964) shows a rnediaiiy broken upper sheath; apparently random
breaks, not gaps as noted above, cornrnon in lower rows. CI: Pyburn (1967); Zweifel
(1964).
Phyllodytes: CO: 7. GR: Trinidad-Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreai.
LTRF: 2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uni- and biserial. SUP:
few laterally. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: rnedial. EP: dorsal. SP:
sinistral. UJ: medium, smooth arc. JJJ: rnedium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates
DIVERSITY
near dorsal taii-bodyjunction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL:
29/36. CI: Bokermann (1966); F. M. Clarke et al. (1995); Giarretta (1996).
Plectrobyla: CO: 16. GR: Mexico-Guatemala. EMG: exotroph: lotic: clasping. LTRF:
2(2)/3. OA: typicai: ventral. MP: complete: uni- and biserial. SUP: row above A-1 and
below P-3, scattered laterally. DEM: absent. NA: small, nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, uniform arc, uniform graded series of serrations,
hypertrophied serrations in specific sections. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. D E low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip round. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark,
some mottiing on tail. TL: 35-43/34. CI: J. A. Campbeii and Kubin (1990); Dueiiman (1970).
Pseudacris: CO: 13. GR: North America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic, benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/3[1]. OA: typical: anteroventral.MP: medium dorsal gap: uni- and biserial,
sometimes narrow ventral gap. SUP: few laterally. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than
snout. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistrai.
narrow to medium, wide arc, sometimes
medial zone straight. LJ: medium, V-shaped. D E medium to high, originates near dorsal
tail-body junction, on body, tip pointed. BS: oval/compressed. CP: muted mottling,
stripes or bicolored on tail. TL: 25-45/36. CI: Aitig (1970); D u e h a n (1970); A. H.
Wright and Wright (1949).
Pternobyla: CO: 2. GR: southern Arizona-Mexico. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: dorsal gap: uniserial dorsolaterally, biserial elsewhere. SUP: few laterally. DEM: absent. NA: small, equidistant between eyes
and snout. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, edge a smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: high, originates on body, tip somewhat pointed with slight
flagellum. BS: oval/compressed. CP: pale dorsolateral stripes. TI,: 38/36. CI: R. G.
Webb (1963).
Ptycbobyla: CO: 10. GR: Mexico-Panama. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic, suctorial.
LTRF: 4(1,4)/7(1), 4(4)/7(1), 4(4)/6(1). OA: typical: nearly ventral. MP: complete:
biserial. SUP: many lateray. DEM: absent. NA: small, nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. U J: medium, edge a smooth arc. LJ: medium, V-shaped.
DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed to rounded. BS: oval/
depressed. CP: dark, some minor mottling, especially on tail. TL: 33-39125-31. CI:
J. A. Campbeii and Smith (1992); D u e h a n (1970).
Scarthyla: CO: 1. GR: Peru. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic. LTRF: 2(1-2)/2(1). OA:
typical: nearly terminal. MP: wide dorsal and ventral gaps: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM:
absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium,
prominent arch, coatsely serrate. LJ: wide, open U-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF: low,
originates posterior to dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: tail
h s with prominent serial blotches that look like incomplete bands. TL: 28/36. NO:
see Scinax. CI: D u e h a n and De S (1988).
Scinm: CO: 81. GR: Mexico-Uruguay. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic, benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/3[1.]. OA: typical: anteroventral, almost terminal. MP: narrow dorsal gap:
uni- and biserial; rostrata group: ventral gap 2 extent of short P-3 that sits upon an
armiike derivative of the lower labium. SUP: few laterally. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye
than snout. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc or with medial
convexity, sometimes coarsely serrate. LJ: medium to wide, V- to open U-shaped. DF:
low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed, or quite high, originates anterior to dorsal td-body junction, tip pointed, sometimes with flagellum. BS: oval/depressed or compressed. CP: iightly pigmented, eye iine common. TL: 20-30136. NO:
see Scartbyla; at least rostrata and wbra groups with distinctive morphology of the oral
apparatus. CI: D u e h a n (1970); Hero and Mijares-Urrutia (1995); Heyer et al. (1990);
McDiarmid and Aitig (1990).
Smilisca: CO: 6. GR: southern Texas-northern South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
benthic; lotic: adherent. LTRF: 2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral. MP: dorsal
gap, complete: uni- and multiserial. SUP: many laterally. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT:
dextral. EP: lateral, dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium to wide, edge a smooth arc or
indentation medially. LJ: medium to wide, open U-shaped. D E low, slightly arched,
originates near dorsal td-body junction or onto body, tip pointed. BS: oval/siightly de-
v:
Scinax; S. su~dlata
Scinm; S. staufiri
Cycloma
pressed. CP: uniformly brownish; pale dorsolateral stripe on body; dorsurn of tail muscle
lightiy banded. TL: 2 2 4 0 / 3 0 4 0 . CI: Dueilman (1970).
Spbaenmbyncbus: CO: 11. GR: Trinidad, Orinoco and Amazon basins of northern South
America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1).OA: typical: anteroventral.
MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few lateraiiy and ventrolateraiiy. DEM: absent.
NA: smaii, nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, slight
medial convexity. LJ: wide, very open U-shaped. DP: low, originates near dorsal tailbody junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: stripes below eye and on mil. TL:
57/35. CI: Bokermann (1974); Da Cniz and Peixoto (1980a); Heyer et al. (1990).
Tepuibyla: CO: 7. GR: eastern Venezuela. NO: no tadpoles known for the 0. rodnauezi
group that was recently elevated to a genus distinct from Osteocepbalus.
Tracbycepbalus: CO: 3. GR: Brazii-Ecuador. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic. LTRF:
4(1-2,4)/6(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: patch
ventrolateraiiy. DEM: absent. NA: small, nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: lateral.
SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, forms smooth arc. LJ: mediurn, open V-shaped. DF: high,
originates on body, tip pointed. BS: oval/cornpressed. CP: body and tail striped. TL: 381
34. NO: shares uncommon LTRF with Pbqmbyas. CI: McDiarmid and Altig (1990).
Triprion: CO: 2. GR: western and southern Mexico. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: mediurn dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: few
lateraiiy. DEM: absent. NA. nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral.
UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide, broadly U-shaped. DE: low, originates at dorsal tailbody junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/slightly depressed. CP: udormly brown. TL: 27/
30. CI: Duellman (1970).
Xenobyla: CO: 2. GR: Brazii. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1). OA:
typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent.
NA: ncarer tip of snout than eye. VT: -. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, with
moderate medial convexity LJ: wide, broadly U-shaped. DF: high, originates directly
behmd plane of eye, tip with prominent flageiium. BS: oval/cornpressed. CP: bold bands
on tail, prominent eye stripe. TL: 32/33. CI: Izecksohn (1997).
Pelodryadiae: CO: 4/143. GR: Australia-New Guinea.
Cyciurana: CO: 12. GJk Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent.
NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc.
LJ: wide, V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip pointed. BS:
oval/depressed. CP: unicolored to faintiy mottled or blotched. TL: 40-70/42. CI: Watson and Martin (1973).
Litmia: CO: 104. GR: Australia-New Guinea. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic; lotic:
benthic, suctorial. LTRF: 213, 2(2)/3[1], 2(2)/2. OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral.
MP: narrow to wide dorsal gap: uni- and biserial; complete: biserial. SUP: absent, few
lateraiiy, many lateraiiy. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout and reverse. VT: dextrai. EP: lateral, dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to wide, smooth arc, slight medial convexity. LJ: narrow to wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body
junction, tip pointed to rounded. BS: oval/depressed or compressed. CP: variable. TL:
30-60/36. NO: species groups not well defined (e.g., Barker and Grigg 1977; King
1981; Tyler 1968; Tyler and Davies 1978). CI: Watson and Martin (1973).
Nyctimystes: CO: 24. GR: northern Australia-New Guinea. EMG: exotroph: lotic: suctorial. LTRF: 2/3. OA: typical: ventral. MP: complete: uniserial. SUP: radiaiiy oriented,
elongate papillae across lower labium distal to P-3. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than
eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, medial modification for suctorial
existence. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates posterior to dorsal tail-body
junction, tip round. BS: oval/depressed. CP: muted mottiing. TL: 33/36. CI: Davies
and Richards (1990); Tyler (1989).
Peiudryas: CO: 3. GR: Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(1-2)/3. OA:
typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent.
NA: equidistant between eye and snout. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: med i u , smooth arc, coarsely serrate. LJ: medium, open V-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF:
low, originates near or slightly posterior to dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointcd. BS:
oval/depressed. CP: tail striped. TL: 41/41. NO: see Litoria. CI: Tyler et al. (1983).
DIVERSITY
Phyllomedusa
open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/
depressed. CP: udormly dark. TL: 52/33. CI: Lamotte et al. (1959a).
Af7walus: CO: 28. GR: sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRE O/
0, 011. OA: typical: nearly terminal. MP: wide dorsal gap: uni- and biserial ventraiiy,
large, widely spaced. SUP: few rnidventrdy. DEM: absent. NA: very smaii, nearer snout
than eye, or reverse. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc or with
medial convexity, serrations often coarse. LJ: wide, smooth arc. DF: low, originates near
dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oblongldepressed. CP: uniformly dotted. TL:
30-65136. NO: ecomorphologicalguild poorly known, may in fact be occur in midwater
or near the surface. CI: Drewes et al. (1989); Pickersgiii (1984); Schgtz (1967, 1975).
Aiextmoon: CO: 1. GR: Cameroon. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: single row from tip of
A-1. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: medium, broad arc with medial area straight, coarsely serrate. LJ: medium, open Ushaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip slightly pointed. BS: oval/
depressed. CP: uniformly brown, margins of fins largely unpigmented. TL: 29/33. CI:
Amiet (1974b).
Arleguinus: CO: 1. GR: Cameroon. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 113. OA:
typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: many throughout the
extent of the marginal papillae. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout then eye. VT: dextral.
EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF:
low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: black
stripe the length of dorsal haif of taii musde and body bordered above and below with
pale stripes; dorsum of taii musde white. TL: 43/36. NO: adult pattern appears before
metamorphosis. CI: Amiet (1976).
Callkalus: CO: 1. GR: Rwanda-Zaire. Tadpole unknown.
Chlorolius: CO: 1. GR: Cameroon-Gabon. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRE 1/
3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: single row dosely
adjacent to marginal papillae laterdy and ventraiiy. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than
eye. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, slight convexity mediaiiy, coarsely
serrate. LJ: medium, V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip
pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform body pigmentation with pale lines from snout
to eyes; distal haifof tail lightly pigmented. TL: 38/36. CI: Amiet (1976).
Chrysobatrachus: CO: 1. GR: Zaire. Tadpole unknown.
Cwtothylux: CO: 2. GR: Cameroon-Zaire. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 1/
3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: single row extending
from A-1. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: -. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: medium, serrated edge describes a smooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DF: low,
originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oblongldepressed. CP: body
brown, td faintly striped. TL: 22/26. CI: Larnotte et ai. (1959b).
Hetwixalus: CO: 7. GR: Madagascar. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 1/3(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few lateraiiy and
row inside marginal papiilae of lower labium. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye.
VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, wide, smooth arc, coarsely serrate.
LJ: medium, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip
rounded. BS: oval/compressed. CP: uniform body, blotched t d . TL: 35/36. CI: Arnoult
and Razarihelisoa (1967); Blommers-Schlosser (1982); Blommers-Schlosser and Blanc
(1991).
Hyprolius: CO: 116. GR: sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
1/3[1], 213. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uni- and biserial, ventral
papillae sometimes elongate. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: aperture margin sometimes papiilate. VT: dextral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc or slight
medial convexity, serrations coarse. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near
dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: variable: unicolored or
striped tail, td tip black, fin margins dark. TL: 30-50136. NO: P-3 usuaiiy much shorter
than P-2. CI: Amiet (1979); Channing and De Capona (1987); Lamotte and Perret
(1963~);Schigtz (1967,1975).
DIVERSITY
LeptopeLis
Lepiriobatracbus
keratinized mouthparts absent. MP: medium to wide dorsal gap, complete, narrow ventral
gap: uni- and biserial. SUP: absent, few laterally or dorsolateraiiy. DEM: absent, lateral. NA:
nearer snout than eye or reverse. VT: medial, dextral or sinistral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral
except in Lqt'dubatrachus (dual/lateral). UJ: variable, narrow to wide, usually a smooth arc,
incised or not. LJ: variable, narrow to wide, U to V-shaped. DF: low, originates near, slightiy
anterior to or weii posterior to the dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded to pointed. BS:
round, oval to oblong/depressed. CP: variable but uniformly dark is cornmon. TL: 15-1301
36.
Ceratophryinae: CO: 6/33. G R South America.
Ceratophlys: CO: 8. G R South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, often carnivorous and spends considerable time swimming in midwater. LTRF: 6(3-6)/7(3), 9(7-9)/
9(1-3) but teeth often lost. OA: typical: nearly terminal. MP: complete: large and
sparsely distributed. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye, or reverse.
VT: medial, dextral or sinistral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, medial notch. LJ:
wide, medial convexity complimentary to upper sheath. DE: low, originates near dorsal
taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: mostiy uniformly dark. TL:
40-70136. NO: jaw musculature hypertrophied. CI: Cei (1980); D u e h a n (1978);
Honegger et ai. (1985).
Champhlys: CO: 1. G R Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 1/2(1). OA:
typical: anteroventral. MP: complete: uniserial, widely spaced. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: large, nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide,
smooth arc. LJ: wide, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates at dorsal td-body junction,
tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly gray, tail muscle bicolored. TL: 40136.
NO: unique flap projects upward from tip of snout. CI: Faivovich and Carrizo (1992).
Lepidubatvachus: CO: 3. G R southern South Arnerica. EMG: exotroph: lentic: carnivore. LTRF: 010. Ok. slitlike mouth exceptiondy large and terminal. MP: complete:
uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA. nearer eye than snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: dual and lateral, but not homologous to spiracles of pipids and rhinophrynids.
UJ: few, widely spaced jaw serrations without basai sheaths on one or both jaws. LJ: see
upper jaw. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip broadly pointed. BS:
round/strongly depressed, widest near plane of eyes. CP: unormly gray or faintiy mottied. TL: 40-60136. NO: Cei (1980) states that L. llanensis has one upper and one lower
tooth row; based on our observations of L. 1 4 , we note that these are actually isolated
jaw serrations, tooth rows are absent; this condition probably occurs in aii three species.
CI: Cei (1980); Ruibal and Thomas (1988).
M ~ * c y ~ e ' n w ~ ~ CO:
t t u s :1. GR: Brazii. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/
3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM:
lateral. NA: equidistant between eye and snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: very narrow, wide, smooth arc, serrations lacking. LJ: very narrow, open U-shaped,
serrations laterally. DF: low, originates at dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oblong/depressed. CP: brownish-gray, reticulated with nonpigmented areas, dorsurn of tail
muscle banded, edges of fins with black areas. TL: 35/30. CI: Abravaya and Jackson
(1978).
Oduntophrynus: CO: 8. G R eastern and southern South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, lotic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3[1.]. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium
dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF: low
originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: body dark,
taii uniform to blotched. TL: 35-45/36. CI: Cararnaschi (1979); Cei (1980).
Proceuatuphlys: CO: 12. G R Brazii-Paraguay. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2/3(1), 2(2)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent, few anterolateral. DEM: lateral, two ventrolateral. NA: large, not round, nearer eye
than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide, open
V-shaped. DF: low, originates near tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed.
CP: tail muscle weakly banded, body and fins speckied. TL: 33/36. CI: Da Cruz and
Peixoto (1980b); Izecksohn et al. (1979).
Hylodinae: CO: 3/28. G R eastern and southern South America.
Crosso~Lus:CO: 9. G R southern South America. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic.
DIVERSITY
LTRF: 3(1,3)/5,2(2)/3[1]. OA: typicai: anteroventrd. MP: medium dorsai gap: uniseriai. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsai.
SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, uniform arc and coarsely serrate. LJ: wide, open U-shaped,
coarsely serrate. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/
depressed. CP: body uniformiy dark, taii and fins with dark specks. TL: 52/37. CI: Caramaschi and Kisteumacher (1989); Caramasch and Sazima (1985); Cei (1980).
Hylodes: CO: 15. GR: eastern South America. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRP:
2(2)/3[1], 2(2)/4. OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: medium dorsai gap: uniseriai. SUP:
absent, few lateray. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal.
SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc but coarsely serrate, mediai serration hypertrophied.
LJ:wide, open U-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL: 36/25. CI: Bokermann
(1966); Heyer et ai. (1990); Sazima and Bokermann (1982).
Mguelosia: CO: 4. GR: Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1). OA:
typicai: anteroventrd. MP: wide dorsal gap: sma and uniserial. SUP: few lateray near
emargination and below P-3. DEM: lateral. NA: sma, nearer snout than eye. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, edge describes smooth arc. LJ: wide, V-shaped.
DF: low, originates near dorsai tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP:
uniforrnly dark. TL: 128125. CI: Giarretta et ai. (1993); Heyer et ai. (1990).
Leptodactylinae: CO: 101121. GR: southem Texas-Chle-Antilies.
Adenomera: CO: 6. GR: South America east of Andes. EMG: endotroph. NO: De la
Riva (1995), based on observations in Bolivia, noted that a species ofAdenomera are
not entirely endotrophic; if the larvae of some forms gain access to free water, they can
develop as typical lentic-inhabiting, leptodactylid tadpoles and resemble the tadpoles of
some Leptodactylus spp., LTRF 2(2)/3(1). CI: De Ia Riva (1995); Heyer and Silverstone
(1969).
Edahhinu: CO: 2. GR: Colombia-Peru. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/
3(1). OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: dorsal gap: biseriai. SUP: few dorsolaterdy.
DEM: absent. NA: equidistant between eye and snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsal. SP:
sinistrai. UJ: narrow, wide uniform arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates
near dorsai taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly pale
brown. TL: 14/25. CI: De Ia Riva (1995); Schiuter (1990).
Hydroluetare: CO: 1. GR: Colombia-Peru. Tadpole unknown.
Leptodaqlus: CO: 50. GR: southern Texas-Mexico-South America-West Indies. EMG:
exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 213, 2(2)/3[.L]. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: medium to wide dorsai gap: uniserial, narrow ventral gap rarely. SUP: absent. DEM: laterai,
absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: narrow to
medium, wide smooth arc. LJ: narrow to medium, U- or V-shaped. DF: low, originates Lept0-h~; L. melanonotw
near dorsai tail-body junaion, tip rounded to pointed. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: often
uniformiy dark. TL: 25-60136. NO: tadpoles of 4-5 species groups can be recognized
by features more subtle than presented here. CI: Cei (1980); Heyer (1973a); Sazima
~eptoakty1w;L. pentaductyLus
and Bokermann (1978).
Lithodytes: CO: 1. GR: Venezuela-Ecuador-Peru. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/3(1). OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap. SUP: absent. DEM:
absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium,
smooth arc. LJ: narrow, wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body
junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL:47/34. NO: large
lower labium extends far beyond lower tooth row. CI: Lamar and Wild (1995); Regos
and Schiuter (1984).
Paratelmutobius: CO: 3. GR: Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lotic or lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2(2)/3(1). OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniseriai midventray. SUP:
absent. DEM: lateral, absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai, mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: narrow, edge a smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low,
originates near dorsai tail-body junaion, tip bluntly pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP:
uniformiy paie brownish, belly lightly pigmented, fins nonpigmented to brownish, tail
muscle blotched. TL: 26-32/37. CI: Cardoso and Haddad (1990); Giarretta and Castanho (1990).
Physaluemus: CO: 37. GR: Mexico-South Arnerica. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/2,2/3(1),2(2)/3(1).OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial, sometimes ventral gap. SUP: few laterdy. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant between
snout and eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: medium,
open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal td-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/
depressed. CP: uniformly dark, mottied. TL: 23/38. NO: some (e.g., l?petersi) with
prominent, white glands on body. CI: Barrio (1953); Heyer et al. (1990).
Pieurodema: CO: 12. GR: southern South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/2, 2(2)/3[1]. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial,
ventral gap sometimes. SUP: rare lateraiiy. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout.
VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, U-shaped.
DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/dcpressed. CP:
uniformly dark, tail muscle mottied. TL: 25/36. CI: Cei (1980); Leon-Ochoa and
Donoso-Barros (1970); Peixoto (1982).
Pseudopaludicoiu: CO: 8. GR: southern South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal and narrow ventral gaps:
uniserial. SUP: row(s) ventrolaterdy. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT:
dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, wide smooth arc. LJ: medium, wide Ushaped. DF: low, originates near or anterior to dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS:
oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 22/36. CI: Barrio (1953); Cei (1980).
Vanwlinius: CO: 1. GR: Ecuador-Peru. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 213.
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: -. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer
eye than snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow. LJ: narrow. DF: low,
originates near dorsal tail-bodyjunction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly
tan or brown. TL: 25/30. CI: Duellman (1978).
Telmatobiinae: CO: 291668. GR: central to southern South America.
Adelopbqvne: CO: 2. GR: Guiana Shield. EMG: endotroph.
Alsodes: CO: 11. GR: Chile-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/
3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few dorsolateraiiy
and row(s) distal to P-3. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant between eye and snout, nearer
eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide,
open V-shaped. DF: low, originates distal to dorsal td-body junction, tip broadly
rounded to pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark, few s m d spots on t d .
TL: 60-75136. CI: Diaz and Valencia (1985).
Atelognathus: CO: 7. GR: Chile-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2(2)/3(1).OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few lateraiiy. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant from eye and snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP:
sinistral. UJ: wide, medial zone of serrate edge straight. LJ: wide, open V-shaped. DF:
low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP:
brown, sparsely pigmented, belly transparent. TL: 57/36. CI: Cei (1964, 1980).
Atqpqphlynus: CO: 1. GR: Colombia. Tadpole unknown.
Baqvcholos: CO: 2. GR: Ecuador-Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Batrachqphqvnus: CO: 2. GR: Peru-Bolivia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2(2)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: throughout
extent of marginal papillae. DEM: absent. NA: -. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates at dorsal td-body
junction, tip broadly rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark, smaii spots on
fins. TL: 67/26. CI: Sinsch (1990).
Bamachyla: CO: 3. GR: ChdeArgentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/
3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: dorso- and ventrolaterdy. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant between eye and snout. VT: dextral. EP:
dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open V-shaped. DF: lou;
originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip roiinded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly
dark, t d speckled. TL: 27-37/33. NO: early stages develop like nidicolous endotrophs.
CI: Cei (1980); Cei and Capurro (1958); Formas and Pugn (1971).
Caudiverbera: CO: 1. GR: Chile. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1).OA:
typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few laterdy. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow, edge
describes smooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates at dorsal tail-body
DIVERSITY
junction, tip pointed. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: paie green in life, distai third of tail dark.
TL: 95/37. NO: Cei (1962) shows a LTRF of 3(2)/3(1) and p-2 and P-3 with nonrnedial
gaps. CI: Diaz and Vaiencia (1985); Jorquera and Izquierdo (1964).
Cromductylodes: CO: 3. GR: Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreai. LTRF: 2(2)/3.
OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: laterai.
NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, small
but prominent mediai convexity, basai margin aiso with convexity. LJ: medium, open Vshaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai tail-body junction, tip round. BS: oblong/depressed. CP: uniforrnly dark. TL: 19/35. CI: Peixoto (1981).
Cycloramphus: CO: 25. GR: Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lotic: semiterrestriai; endotroph.
LTRF: 213, 2(1-2)/3(1), 2/3(1), 2(1)/3(1). OA. typicai: anteroventral, ventrai. MP:
wide dorsai gap: uniseriai. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: see notes. VT: mediai. EP:
dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, strongly arched. LJ: medium, strongly arched. DF:
low, originates weli posterior of dorsai tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oblong to
oval/depressed. CP: umform to mottled, tail muscle may be slightly banded. TL: 2 0 4 0 1
36. NO: Heyer et ai. (1990) reported nares absent in C. boraceiensis but seem apparent
in figure; Heyer (1983a, b) did not locate a spiracle on C. boraceiensis or C. v a h ; may
have parts of abdominal w d expanded as a free flap. CI: Heyer (1983a, b).
Dirchidodagylus: CO: 2. GR: Venezuela. EMG: endotroph.
Eeutherodactylus: CO: 515. GR: North, Central, and South America-Caribbean.
EMG: endotroph.
Euparkerella: CO: 4. GR: Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Eupsophw: CO: 8. GR: Chile-Argentina. EMG: endotroph.
Geobatrachus: CO: 1. GR: Colombia. EMG: endotroph.
Holoaden: CO: 2. GR: Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Hylorina: CO: 1. GR: Chile-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRP: 2(2)/
3(1). OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few centripetally
arranged throughout extent of marginai papiilae. DEM: laterai. NA: equidistant between
snout and eyes. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, serrated edge alrnost
transversely straight. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF: somewhat arched, originates near
dorsai tail-body junction, tip broadiy rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform with
dark spots throughout t d . TL: 51/38. CI: Barrio (1976); Formas and Pugn (1978).
Insuetophlynw: CO: 1. GR: Chile. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/2(1-2)
or' less. OA: typicai: ventrai, jaw sheaths and labial tooth rows reduced. MP: medium
dorsai gap: uniserial, papillae very s m d . SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: s m d , nearer
eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: s m d , weakly developed but
serrate. LJ: similar and U-shaped. DF: low, originates at dorsai td-body junction, tip
broadiy rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: greenish brown in life, irregularly mottled.
TL: 61/37. NO: lower tooth rows sometimes absent, one drawing of oral variation
shows complete marginal papiiiae, laterai line visible. CI: Diaz and Vaiencia (1985);
Formas et al. (1980).
Ischnucnema: CO: 3. GR: Amazonia-Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Limnumedusa: CO: 1. GR: Brazil-Argentina. EMG: exotroph:. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1). OA:
typicai: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: numerous aiong d marginal papiiiae. DEM: laterai. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai. SP:
sinistrai. UJ: wide, uniform arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near
dorsai tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: body uniform, tail boldiy
spotted. TL: 42/34. CI: Cei 1980; Gehrau and De S (1980).
Phlynupus: CO: 20. GR: Andean South America. EMG: endotroph.
Phyllonaster: CO: 4. GR: Pem-Ecuador. EMG: endotroph.
Phyzelaphlyne: CO: 1. GR: Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Scythrophlyr: CO: 1. GR: Brazil. Tadpole unknown.
Somuncuria: CO: 1. GR: Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1).
OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and smaer ventral gaps: biseriai. SUP:
absent. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant between eye and snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai.
SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, smooth arc, or perhaps a slight mediai concavity in margin. LJ:
wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai tail-body junction, tip rounded.
BS: ovai/depressed. CP: body dark, tail blotched. TL: 46/36. CI: Cei (1980).
Insuetophvynw
Thoropa
L.eptobracheUa
Lqtobrnchium
Telmatobius: CO: 35. GR: Ecuador-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic; lotic:
benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uni- and
biserial. SUP: few dorsolateraiiy, lateraliy and distal to P-3. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant between eye and snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, edge a
smooth arc. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction,
tip rounded to pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform to muted motthng. TL: 60100137. CI: Diaz and Valencia (1985); Lavilla (1984a, 1985,1988).
Telmatobufo: CO: 3. GR: Chile. EMG: exotroph: lotic: suctorial. LTRP: 2/3(1). OA:
typical: ventral. MP: complete: uniserial. SUP: muitiple rows centripetaiiyto ali marginal
papillae except at lateral margins of disc. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT:
dextral, vent flap underiies tube. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, open V-shaped.
LJ: medium, open V-shaped, "internal borders smooth" (Diaz et al. 1983). DF: low,
originates weii posterior of dorsal td-body junction, tip broadly pointed. BS: oval/depressed, may narrow appreciably posterior to oral disc. CP: dark brown, orange protuberances over body dorsum. TL: 107140. CI: Diaz et al. (1983); Formas (1972).
Thopa: CO: 5. GR: Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lotic: serniterrestrial. LTRP: 2(1-2)/3(1).
OA: typical: ventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA:
nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, strongly
arched and coarsely serrate. LJ: wide, strongly arched. DF: low, originates on taii muscle
weii posterior to dorsal taii-body junction, almost absent in some, tip rounded. BS: obIongJdepressed. CP: uniform dark to mottled; taii muscle banded. TL: 20-30136. NO:
some have parts of lateral margins of abdominal wali expanded as a free flap; nidicolous
endotrophs may be involved (Bokermann 1965). CI: Caramaschi and Sazirna (1984).
Z1u:haenus: CO: 3. GR: Brazil-Argentina. EMG: endotroph.
MEGOPHRYIDAE: CO: 9/79. GR: northern India-China-Philippines. EMG: exotroph:
lotic: clasping, neustonic, benthic; endotroph. LTRF: 010 to 717. OA: typical: anteroventral,
ventral; umbeliiform: oral disc bi-triangular. MP: narrow dorsal gap, complete, absent: uniserial. SUP: scattered near mouth, few lateraliy, some arranged radialiy to mouth. DEM: absent, dorsal and ventral. NA: equidistant between eye and snout, nearer eye than snout or
reverse. VT: dextral, medial. EP: dorsal, lateral. SP: sinistral but weii below longitudinal axis.
UJ: absent, medium to wide, smali medial convexity or not. LJ: absent, medium to wide, Uor V-shaped. DF: low, originates near or posterior to dorsal tail-bodyjunaion, tip rounded to
pointed. BS: oval to elongate/depressed. CP: muted mottiing to unicolored. TL: 25-75/36.
Atympanophys: CO: 1. GR: China. Tadpole unknown.
Bv1u:hytamophys: CO: 1. GR: Burma-China-Thdand. Tadpole unknown.
Leptubvachela: CO: 7. GR: Borne+Natuna Islands. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic.
LTRF: 010. OA: typical: ventral. MP: narrow dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: scattered near
mouth. DEM: dorsal and ventral. NA: nearer snout than eye, one medial projection.
VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral but weii below longitudinal axis. UJ: medium,
smali medial convexity. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, especialiy in proximal
third, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip round. BS: oblong/depressed. CP:
uniformly dark. TL: 3045/36. CI: Inger (1983,1985).
Leptobrachium: CO: 10. GR: Indonesia-China-Philippines. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRP: 3(1-3)/4(1-3) to 7(2-6)/6(1-5). OA: typical: anteroventral to ventral. MP:
complete: uniserial. SUP: few lateraliy. DEM: absent. NA: equidistant between eye and
snout, 1-3 medial projeaions. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral but weii below longitudinal axis. UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide, wide V-shaped. DF: low, originates near
dorsal tail-body junaion, tip pointed to rounded. BS: oval to oblongJdepressed. CP:
uniforndy dark. TL: 30-50136. NO: LTRF very variable, integumentary glands sometimes present, submarginal papillae commonly have labial teeth. CI: Berry (1972); Inger
(1983, 1985).
Leptohh: CO: 7. GR: Burma-China-Borneo. EMG: exotroph: lotic: suctorial, clasping. LTRF: 5(2-5)/3(1-2). OA: typical: ventral. MP: narrow dorsal gap or complete:
uniserial. SUP: scattered above and below mouth, probably rudimentary tooth ridges.
DEM: dorsal and ventral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai but weii below longituduial axis. UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide, open U-shaped.
DF: low, particuiarly in first fourth, originates distal to dorsal td-body junction, tip
DIVERSITY
rounded. BS: oblong/very depressed. CP: uniformiy brown. TL: 25-50136. NO: integumentary glands dorsolateraiiy. CI: Inger (1966).
MgupInys: CO: 25. GR: Southeast Asia-China-Philippines-Greater Sundas. EMG: exotroph: lotic: neustonic; endotroph. LTRF: 010. OA: umbelliform: bi-triangular. MP:
slight crenulations to none. SUP: scattered throughout oral disc, some arranged radiaiiy
to mouth. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout then eye. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral but well below longitudinal axis. UJ: absent, minor keratinization. LJ: minor keratinization. DF: low, originates near or posterior to dorsal td-body junction, tip pointed.
BS: oblong/depressed. CP: beily striped in some. TL: 30-50136. CI: Inger (1985); C.C. Liu and Hu (1961); Ye and Fei (1996).
Ophryophryne: CO: 3. GR: Vietnam-China. Tadpole unknown.
Scutigev: CO: 24. GR: India-China. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic, clasping. LTRF:
5(2-5)/4(14), 5(2-5)/6(1-5), 6(2-6)/6(1-5), 7(2-7)/7(1-6). OA: typical: anteroventrai. MP: narrow dorsal gap: uniserial, dorsal gap absent: uniserial. SUP: few lateray.
DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral but well
below longitudinal axis. UJ: very wde, smooth arc, very coarsely serrate. LJ: wide, wide
U-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip
rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL: 60-75136. NO: C.-C. Liu (1950)
showed labial teeth on submarginal papdae. CI: C.-C. Liu (1950).
Vibrissaphora: CO: 1. GR: southern Cima. EMG: exotroph: lotic. LTRF: 6(2-6)/4(1),
6(2-6), 6(1-5), A-1 exceptionaiiy short. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: narrow dorsal
gap: uniserial. SUP: few ventrolaterally. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT:
-. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai but weil below longitudinal axis. UJ: very wide, narrow Ushaped, very coarsely serrate. LJ: very wide, wide U-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF: low,
originates near dorsai tail-bodyjunction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy
dark body, fins with coarse blotches. TL: -. CI: C.-C. Liu and Hu (1961).
MICROHYLIDAE: CO: 651327. GR: North and South America, Mrica, India-KoreaAustropapuan region. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder, psarnmonic; endotroph.
LTRF: 010. OA: keratinized structures absent (except in Otophyne and Scaphiophlyne); any
resemblance to an oral disc absent (except in umbelliformMicvohyla, Nelsonuphryne, Otophryne,
and Scaphiophryne), oral apparatus usuaiiy involves semicircular to straight-edged oral flaps
pendant over terminal mouth, few species with umbelliform oral disc. MP: not applicable
except-in Nelsonuphyne and some endotrophs. SUP: not applicable except perhaps in Nelsonupbryne. DEM: not applicable. NA: usuaiiy absent until metamorphosis but positioned nearer
snout than eye. VT: medial, dextral. EP: lateral, dorsal. SP: midventral on chest, abdomen
or near vent, appears sinistrai in diflerent configurations in Otophryne and Stereocyclops. UJ:
usuaiiy absent but Scaphwpbryne has unpigmented jaw sheaths, Otuphryne has hypertrophied
serrations without a basal sheath. LJ: as upper jaw. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body
junction, sometimes with flagellum. BS: round to oval/depressed. CP: dorsum uniform,
sometimes with sagittal line, venter sometimes mottled or striped. TL: 15-35/36.
Asterophryinae: CO: 8/49. GR: New Guinea.
Asteruphrys: CO: 1. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Barygenys: CO: 7. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Callulops: CO: 13. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Hylophorbus: CO: 1. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Mantuphryne: CO: 3. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Pherohapsis: CO: 1. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Xenoba~acbus:CO: 17. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Xenurhzna: CO: 6. GR: New Guinea. EMG: endotroph.
Brevicipitinae: CO: 5/19. GR: eastern and southern Afiica.
Balebrevimps: CO: 1. GR: Ethiopia. EMG: endotroph.
Breuiceps: CO: 13. GR: southern f i c a . EMG: endotroph.
Callulina: CO: 1. GR: Tanzania. EMG: endotroph.
Probreuiceps: CO: 3 . GR: Tanzania-Zimbabwe. EMG: endotroph.
Spelaeuphryne: CO: 1. GR: Tanzania. EMG: endotroph.
Cophylinae: CO: 7/36. GR: Madagascar.
Anuhnthyla: CO: 4. GR: Madagascar. EMG: endotroph.
320
DIVERSITY
terminal mouth. MP: not applicable. SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA:
absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: midventral on lower abdomen. UJ: absent. LJ:
absent. DF: low, originates at dorsal taii-body junaion, tip pointed with flageiium. BS:
rounded/depressed. CP: unifordy pale. TL: 17/36. CI: Schiter and Salas (1991).
Cteqhryne: CO: 2. GR: Colombia-Brazii. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA: straight-edged upper lip without oral flaps above terminal mouth. MP:
not applicable. SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP:
lateral. SP: midventral. UJ: absent. LJ: absent DF: low, originates at dorsal tail-body
junaion, tip round. BS: rounded/depressed. CP: unifordy pale. TL: 12/25. CI:
Schiter and Salas (1991).
Dmypops: CO: 1. GR: Brazii. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder. LTRF: 010.
OA: labial flaps reduced without medial notch. MP: not applicable. SUP: not applicable.
DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: midventral near vent.
UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates at dorsal taii-body junction, tip rounded
without flageiium. BS: oval/depressed. CP: unifordy dark, beliy spotted and banded.
TL: 52/37. CI: Da Cruz and Peixoto (1978).
Demzatonotus: CO: 1. GR: Brazil-Paraguay. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA: semicircular oral flaps with smooth edges pendant over terminal mouth.
MP: not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial.
EP: lateral. SP: midventral below vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: moderately high,
originates at dorsal taii-body junction, tip rounded as flageiium. BS: rounded/depressed.
CP: unifordy dark. TL: 36/35. NO: tail sheath (see text) present. CI: Cei (1980);
Laviiia (1992b); Vizotto (1967).
Elachistocleis: CO: 4. GR: Panama-Argentina. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRP: 010. OA: semicircular oral flaps with smooth edges pendant over terminal mouth.
MP: not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial.
EP: lateral. SP: midventral near vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates near
dorsal taii-body junaion, tip pointed. BS: rounded/depressed. CP: unifordy pale, tail
muscle striped. TL: 15-22/36. CI: J. D. Wdiams and Gudynas (1987).
Gascrophryne: CO: 5. GR: United States-Costa Rica. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension
feeder. LTRF: 010. OA: semicircular oral flaps with smooth edges pendant over terminal
mouth. MP: not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT:
medial. EP: lateral. SP: midventral near vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates
ne'ar dorsal tail-body junaion, tip pointed. BS: rounded/depressed. CP: uniform dorsaliy, sagittal stripe, beliy mottled or blotched. TL: 35/36. CI: Donneliy et ai. (1990a);
C. E. Nelson and Altig (1972); C. E. Nelson and Cueliar (1968); Orton (1952); A. H.
Wright and Wright (1949).
Gas~rophrynoides:CO: 1. GR: Borneo. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreal (probably sti
feeds as a suspension feeder). LTRP: 010. OA: greatiy reduced straight-edged oral flap
above terminal mouth. MP: not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable.
NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: midventral on gut. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF:
low, originates near dorsal taii-body junaion, tip round. BS: rounded/depressed. CP:
unifordy dark. TL: -. CI: tentative identification based on Inger (1985:38).
Glyphoglosus: CO: 1. GR: Burma-Thailand. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRP: 010. OA: straight-edgedupper lip without oral flaps above terminal mouth. MP:
not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP:
lateral. SP: midventral below gut. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates near dorsal
td-body junaion, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: pale brown, translucent, distal
part of tail dark. TL: 40136. NO: M. A. Smith (1917) reports data on the nares as if
they were present, hangs in midwater at a 45" angle. CI: M. A. Smith (1917).
Hamptophryne: CO: 1. GR: northern and western Arnazon Basin-Guianas-Bolivia.
EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder. LTRF: 010. OA: semicircular oral flaps with
smooth to slightiy crenulate edges pendant over terminal mouth. MP: not applicable
SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP:
midventral near vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body
junaion, tip pointed. BS: rounded/depressed. CP: dark, taii striped. TL: 32/36. CI:
Dueilman (1978); Schiter and Salas (1991).
Hyophryne: CO: 1. GR: Brazii. Tadpole unknown.
Hamptophryne
Microhyla
Nelsonoplnyne
Hypopachus: CO: 2. GR: southern United States-Costa Rica. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
suspension feeder. LTRF: 010. OA: semicircular oral flaps with scalioped-papiilate edges
pendant over terminal mouth. MP: not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: midventral near vent. UJ: absent. LJ:
absent. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junaion, tip pointed. BS: rounded/
depressed. CP: dark reticulations, lightiy striped tail. TL: 21/36. NO: tadpoles described
by E. H . Taylor (1942) as H . alboventer likely belong to a species of Gastrophyne. CI:
C. E. Nelson and Cuellar (1968); Stuart (1941).
Kduphynus: CO: 10. GR: southern China-Java-Phdippines. EMG: endotroph
Kkloula: CO: 10. GR: Korea-Sri Lanka. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA: straight-edged upper lip without oral flaps above terminal mouth. MP:
not applicable. SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP:
lateral. SP: midventral near vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates near dorsal
tail-bodyjunaion, tip pointed. BS: rounded/depressed. CP: uniform, tail striped, terminal part of tail may be unpigmented. TL: 25-30136. CI: Kirtisinghe (1958); C.-C. Liu
(1950).
Metaphynella: CO: 2. GR: Malaysia-Borneo. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA: dorsoterminal, no oral flaps, 2-3 papiilae at lower jaw. MP: not applicable. SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: dorsal.
SP: midventral on chest. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates slightiy posterior
of dorsal tail-body junaion, tip round. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniforrnly brown. TL:
32/36. NO: Berry (1972) reports open nares from stage 26 onward. CI: Berry (1972).
Micyohyh: CO: 24. GR: Sri Lanka-Japan-China-Southeast Asia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder. LTRF: 010. OA: smali to large semicircular oral flaps with smooth
edges pendant over terminal mouth, umbeiliform taxa have oral disc with radialiy arranged submarginal papiilae, and formed almost entirely of lower labium. MP: not applicable. SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral.
SP: midventral on belly or near vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates near
dorsal tail-body junaion, tip pointed with or without a flagellum. BS: round to oval/
depressed. CP: dark, belly sometimes mottle or banded, tail striped. TL: 20-30136. CI:
Chou and Lin (1997); Heyer (1971); Inger (1985); Inger and Frogner (1979).
Myersielh: CO: 1.GR: eastern Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Nelsonophyne: CO: 2. GR: Costa Rica-western Ecuador. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder. LTRF: 010. OA: labial flaps absent, upper lip derivative forms large lateral
flaps, smali lower labium. MP: absent, although some papillae midventrally resemble
marginal papiilae. SUP: absent. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP:
lateral. SP: midventral on gut. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates near dorsal
td-body junaion, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 44/34. CI:
Donneily et al. (1990a).
Otophlyne: CO: 3. GR: northern South America. EMG: exotroph: lotic: psamrnonic.
LTRF: 010. OA: oral disc derivatives reduced to lateral, verticaliy oriented flaps, nascent
tooth ridges present below lower jaw but no teeth present. MP: not applicable. SUP:
not applicable. DEM: not applicable NA: absent VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: appears
sinistral but starts development midventrally, spiracular tube very long and free from
body wall. UJ: isolated, hypertrophied jaw serrations without basal sheath. LJ: similar to
upper jaw. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junaion, tip rounded. BS: oblong/
depressed. CP: uniformiy pale brown. TL: 36/36. CI: J. A. Campbeil and Clarke (1988);
Pyburn (1980); Wassersug and Pyburn (1987).
Phynelh: CO: 1. GR: Malaysia-Sumatra. EMG: endotroph.
Ramanelh: CO: 8. GR: India-Sri Lanka. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA: smooth-edged, entire, smali oral flap slightiy pendant over terminal
mouth. MP: not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT:
medial. EP: lateral. SP: midventral near vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DF: low, originates
near dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: rounded/depressed. CP: uniform. TL:
27/32. NO: Kirtisinghe (1958) reports open nares. CI: Kirtisinghe (1958).
Relictovomer: CO: 1. GR: Panama-Colombia. Tadpole unknown.
Stereocyc&ps: CO: 1. GR: Brazil. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder. LTRF: 010.
DIVERSITY
OA: semicircular oral flaps with smooth edges pendant over terminal mouth. M E not
applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP:
lateral. SP: midventral but opens to lefi of the plane of the ventral fin along with vent.
UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DE: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed.
BS: round/depressed. CP: uniform (see note). TL: -. NO: I. Grifliths and De Carvalho
(1965) discuss polymorphisms of a middorsal stripe and spiracular tube length; tail
sheath (see text) present. CI: I. Grifliths and De Carvalho (1965).
Synapturanus: CO: 3. GR: Colombia-Guianas-Brazil. EMG: endotroph.
Syncope: CO: 2. GR: eastem Ecuador-Peru. EMG: endotroph.
Uperodon: CO: 2. GR: India-Sri Lanka. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA. smooth-edged entire (no medial notch) oral flap pendant over terminal
mouth. MP: not applicable SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT:
medial. EP: lateral. SP: midventral near vent. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DE: low, originates
near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform or mottled
with striped tail. TI,: 28/36. NO: Bhaduri and Daniel (1956) and Mohanty-Hejrnadi
et al. (1979) report open nares. CI: Kirtisinghe (1957).
Phrynomerinae: CO: 115. GR: sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension
feeder. LTRF: 010. OA: no keratinized mouthparts, entire (without medial notch) oral flap
with smooth edges pendant over terminal mouth. MP: not applicable. SUP: not applicable.
DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: rnidventral, below vent.
UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DE: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, flagellurn present. BS: round/depressed. CP: uniformly pale, tail fins may be darker. TL: 37/36.
Phryvwmantzs: CO: 5. CI: Lamotte (1964); Wager (1986).
Scaphiophryninae: CO: 2/10. GR: Madagascar
Parauxophyh: CO: 1. GR: Madagascar. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA: semicircular oral flaps with smooth edges pendant over terminal mouth.
MP: absent. SUP: absent. DEM: not applicable. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: lateral.
SP: midventral, on abdomen. UJ: absent. LJ: absent. DE: low, originates near dorsal
tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: round/depressed. CP: dark dorsaily with pale spot on
snout and over lungs. TL: 28/36. NO: looks like a microhyline tadpole. CI: BlommersSchlosser and Blanc (1991); Glaw and Vences (1992).
Scaphiophryne: CO: 9. GR: Madagascar. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder, may
rasp some materials, sometimes carnivorous. LTRF: 010. OA: s m d oral disc with papillae and unpigmented, serrated jaw sheaths, labial teeth lacking. MP: complete. SUP: few
dorsaily and ventraily. DEM: absent. NA: absent. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: midventrai at center of beiiy. UJ: wide, uniform arc, unpigmented. LJ: wide, open U-shaped,
unpigmented. DE: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/
depressed. CP: very lightly pigrnented, translucent. TL: 30136. NO: only rnicrohylid
tadpole with fdiy formed jaw sheaths (see Otophryne). CI: Blornmers-Schlosser (1975);
Blommers-Schlosser and Blanc (1991); Glaw and Vences (1992); Wassersug (1984).
MYOBATRACHIDAE: CO: 231118. GR: Australia-New Guinea. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
benthic, carnivore, nektonic; lotic: benthic, clasping; endotroph. LTRF: many variations between 010 and 813. OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral. MP: complete, mediurn to wide dorsal
gap, narrow to wide ventrai gap. SUP: absent, throughout extent of marginal papiiiae, below
P-3, few lateraily. DEM: absent, lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout or reverse. VT: dextral,
medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to wide, smooth arc. LJ: narrow to wide, U- to
V-shaped. DE: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, high and originates anterior to
dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded to pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform to variou
muted patterns. TL: 15-70136.
Lirnnodynastinae: CO: 11151. GR: Australia-New Guinea.
Adehtus: CO: 1.GR: eastern Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 3(2-3)/
3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: mediurn dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: throughout
extend of marginal papillae. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP:
dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow, wide smooth arc. LJ: narrow, open V-shaped. DF: low,
originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform.
TL: 33/33. CI: Watson and Martin (1973).
Adehtus
324
Helezbporus: CO: 6. GR: Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 8(2-8)/3(1),
6(2-6)/3(1), 5(3-5)/3(1), 5(2-5)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal
gap: uniseriai. SUP: row below P-3. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT:
medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped.
DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP:
udormiy dark. TL: 30-45136. CI: Davies (1991); A. K. Lee (1967).
Kyawanus: CO: 3. GR: eastern Australia. EMG: endotroph.
Lechriodus: CO: 5. GR: eastern Australia-New Guinea. EMG: exotroph: lentic: carnivore. LTRF: 6(2-6)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial.
SUP: throughout extent of marginal papillae. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye.
VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, wide smooth arc. LJ: medium, open
V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip broadly rounded. BS:
oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 33/34. CI: Watson and Martin (1973).
Limmdynastes: CO: 12. GR: Australia-New Guinea. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic;
lotic: benthic. LTRF: 6(2-6)/3(1), 5(2-5)/3(1), 4(3-4)/3(1), 4(2-4)/3(1), 2(2)/3(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: few lateraiiy. DEM:
lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye or reverse. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ:
medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taiibody junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform to muted mottling. TL:
35-70136. CI: Tyler et al. (1983).
Mgiistobtis: CO: 1. GR: northwestern Australia. EMG: exotroph: lotic: clasping. LTRF:
6(3-6)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: narrow dorsai gap: uniserial ventraiiy and
biserial dorsolateraiiy. SUP: few lateraiiy and below lower tooth rows. DEM: absent.
NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: mediai. SP: sinistrai. EP: dorsai. UJ: medium, edge
describes smooth arc. LJ: medium, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taiibody junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL: 52/42. CI:
Tyler et al. (1979).
Mkophyes: CO: 6. GR: eastern Australia. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic; lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 6(2-6)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: complete: uniserial. SUP: few lateraiiy. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. SP: sinistral. EP: dorsal.
UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, very wide U-shaped. DF: low, originates near
dorsai taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL:
60-70137. NO: 1-5 accessory rows may be present anterior of lateral ends of lower rows.
CI: Davies (1991); Watson and Martin (1973).
Neobatrachus: CO: 10. GR: Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 3(2-3)/
3(1). OA: tjpical: anteroventral. MP: dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: laterai.
NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium to wide,
smooth arc. LJ: medium to wide, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal taiibody junaion, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL: 40-50136. CI:
Davies (1991); Watson and Martin (1973).
Notaden: CO: 4. GR: Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 3(2-3)/3(1),
2(2)/2(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal and ventral gap: uniserial. SUP:
absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal
tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniform. TL: 25/24. CI: E
Slater and Main (1963); Tyler et al. (1983).
Philoria: CO: 1. GR: northeastern Australia. EMG: endotroph.
Rhwbatrachus: CO: 2. GR: northeastern Australia. EMG: endotroph.
Myobatrachinae: CO: 12/67. GR: Australia-New Guinea.
Arenophlyne: CO: 1. GR: Western Australia. EMG: endotroph.
Assa: CO: 1. GR: northeastern Australia. EMG: endotroph.
Blyobatrachus: CO: 1. GR: Tanzania. EMG: endotroph.
Crinia: CO: 14. GR: Australia-New Guinea. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic; lotic:
benthic. LTRF: 2(2)/3(1), 2/3(1), 2(2)/2. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal
gap and narrow to wide ventral gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: laterai, absent. NA:
nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium wide smooth
arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip
DIVERSITY
rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: dark, minor mottling. TI,: 15-20136. CI: Littlejohn
and Martin (1965); Watson and Martin (1973).
Geocrinia:CO: 7. GR: southern Austraiia. EMG: exotrophic: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 010,
2(2)/3[I.]. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and narrow ventrai gaps: biserial.
SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, smooth arc with mediai part straight. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF:
low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip round. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL: 22/30. CI: Littlejohn and Martin (1964); Watson and Martin (1973).
Met-nia: CO: 1. GR: southwestern Australia. Tadpole unknown.
Myobacrmhus: CO: 1. GR: Western Australia. EMG: endotroph.
Paracrinia: CO: 1. GR: eastern Australia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic. LTRF:
2(2)/2. OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: medium dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent.
DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ:
medium, smooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DF: high, originates anterior to dorsai
tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformiy paie. TL: 34/34. CI:
Watson and Martin (1973).
Aeudophryne: CO: 10. GR: eastern Austraiia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2(2)/3[:1.]. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai gap and narrow ventrai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai.
SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates
near dorsai tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL:
20-25136. CI: Watson and Martin (1973).
Spicospina: CO: 1. GR: southwestern Australia. Tadpole unknown. CI: J. D. Roberts
et ai. (1997).
Taua!&yLus:CO: 6. GR: eastern Australia. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 010,
2(2)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral. MP: complete: uniserial. SUP: absent.
DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ: very
narrow, smooth arc, coarsely serrate. LJ:very narrow, open U-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF:
low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip round. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 15-25/36. CI: Retaick and Hero 1998; Watson and Martin (1973).
Uperoieia: CO: 23. GR: northeastern Australia-New Guinea. EMG: exotroph: lentic:
benthic. LTRF: 1/3,2(2)/3[1]. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsai and ventrai
gaps: uniserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai.
EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc with slight mediai convexity. LJ: medium,
open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip slightly rounded.
BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 31/36. CI: Tyler et al. (1983).
PELOBATIDAE: CO: 3111. GR: Europe-North America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic,
carnivore. LTRF: 414 to 616, A-1 usuaily very short. OA: typical: anteroventral, aimost terminal. MP: narrow dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: absent, few lateraily. DEM: absent. NA: nearer
snout then eye. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: low on lefi side, sometimes aimost midventral.
UJ: wide, smooth arc, uniess a carnivore and then with a mediai convexity. LJ:wide, smooth
arc, uniess a carnivore and then with a mediai concavity. DF: low, originates near dorsai taiibody junction, tip bluntly pointed. BS: oblong/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark or paie, depending on environmental conditions. TL: 20-80136. NO: cannibal morphotypes of Spea
have highly modified keratinized mouthparts and jaw muscuiature.
Pelobates: CO: 4. GR: Europe. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRP: 4(24)/5(1-3).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: narrow dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: row throughout
extent of marginal papillae. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout then eye. VT: medial. EP:
dorsai. SP: low on lefi side. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF:
low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip bluntly pointed. BS: ovai/globuiar. CP:
muted mottling. TL: 40-60136. CI: Bouienger (1892); Lanza (1983).
ScaphiUpus: CO: 3. GR: North America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
6(4-6)/6(1), 4(34)/4(1-2). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: narrow dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: few lateraily. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout then eye. VT: mediai. EP:
dorsai. SP: low on lefi side. UJ: narrow, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open U-shaped, basai
part may appear striated. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip bluntly
scaphiupw
pointed. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 20-35136. CI: Aitig (1970);
A. H. Wright and Wright (1949).
Spea: CO: 4. GR: North America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, facultative carnivore.
LTRF: 4(2-4)/4(1-3), 4(3-4)/4(1-2). OA: typical: aimost terminal. MP: narrow dorsai
gap: uniseriai. SUP: few lateray, absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout then eye. VT:
mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: low on lefi side. UJ: typicai: wide, smooth are; carnivore: mediai
convexity. LJ: typical: wide, V-shaped; carnivore: mediai indentation, basai pan- may appear striated. DF: low, originates near dorsai tail-body junction, tip bluntiy pointed. BS:
oval/globular. CP: uniformly dark or pde. TL: 40-80136. NO: usuay has keratinized
knob on the roof of the buccai cavity, LTRF vanable. CI: Aitig (1970); A. H. Wright
and Wright (1949).
Peodytes
Hymenocbirus
DIVERSITY
Xenopus: CO: 14. GR: sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: suspension feeder.
LTRF: 010. OA: single barbel at corners of terminal, slitlike mouth. MP: not applicable.
SUP: not applicable. DEM: not applicable. NA: near snout, transverseiy elliptical. VT:
medial. EP: lateral. SP: dual/lateral. UJ: not applicable. LJ: not applicable. DF: very
low, originates near or posterior to dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed as a constantly
undulating flagellum. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly pale. TL: 35-60136. NO:
barbel with extrinsic musculature and cartilage support, ventral fin extends onto abdomen
as a rounded lobe; floats head-downward in water. CI: Arnoult and Lamotte (1968);
Nieuwkoop and Faber (1967); Rau (1978); Vigny (1979).
PSEUDIDAE: CO: 215. GR: South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, nektonic.
LTRF: 2/3[1], 2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP:
few lateraily, absent. DEM: absent. NA. nearer snout than eye. VT: medial, sinistral. EP:
lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium to wide, medial edge arced or straight. LJ: medium, open
U-shaped. DF: hgh, originates well anterior of dorsal tail-body junction or low, originates
weii anterior of dorsal td-body junction, tip rounded to pointed. BS: oval/compressed. CP:
often brightly patterned and prominent ontogenetic change. TL: 34-230136.
Lysapsus: CO: 3. GR: South America east of Andes. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRP: 2(2)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: few
lateraliy. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: sinistral. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral.
UJ: wide, medial edge straight. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates weli
anterior of dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/compressed. CP: entire t d
boldly banded. TL: 34/37. NO: tail tip black, black bar at base of tad muscle and h,
perhaps only case reported of a sinistral vent tube being characteristic of a species. CI:
Kehr and Basso (1990).
Pseudis: CO: 2. GR: South America. EMG: exotroph: lentic: nektonic. LTRF: 2/3(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium,
smooth are. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: high, originates near or anterior to plane
of eyes, tip rounded. BS: oval/compressed. CP: young tadpole boldly banded, older ones
unicolored dark. TL: 230136. NO: metamorphc atrophy of fins precedes that of tad
myotomes. CI: De S and Lavilla (1997); Dixon et al. (1995); Kenny (1969a).
RANIDAE: CO: 451635. GR: widespread. EMG: exotroph: lentic: several gudds; lotic:
several gudds; endotroph. LTRF: many variations benveen 010 and 918, 213 and n/3 most
common. OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral to almost terminal, oral disc reduced and LTRF
absent. MP: wide dorsal gap, dorsal and ventral gaps: uni- and biserial. SUP: absent, few
lateraily. DEM: lateral, absent. NA: nearer eye than snout or reverse. VT: dextral, medial. EP:
dorsal, lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to wide, smooth arc, mediai convexity. LJ: narrow to
wide, U- to V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junctions, very low, originates
on tail muscle, tip pointed to round. BS: oval/depressed. CP: mostly muted tones of mottling.
TL: 30-100136.
Petropedetinae: CO: 13/94. GR: Africa.
Anhydrophiyne: CO: 1. GR: South Africa. EMG: endotroph.
Archroleptella: CO: 3. GR: South Africa. EMG: endotroph.
Archroleptzdes: CO: 2. GR: Tanzania-Kenya. EMG: exotroph: lotic: semiterrestrial.
LTRF: 3(1-3)/3(1). OA: typical: ventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial ventrally. SUP:
absent. DEM: absent. NA: smail, nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP:
sinistral. UJ: wide, strongly arched, medial convexity. LJ: similar to upper sheath. DF:
very low, originates on tail muscle, tip round. BS: oval/depressed. CP: mottled. TL: 301
36. NO: eyes bulge noticeably, hind legs develop precociously relative to front legs and
general development. CI: Drewes et ai. (1989).
Cacostemum: CO: 7. GR: southern Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
2(2)/3(1), 3(2-3)/3,4(2-4)/3 (1).OA: typical: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: few in row laterally. DEM: lateral, absent. NA: equidistant or nearer eye
than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, medial convexity, coarsely
serrate. LJ: wide, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip
pointed to rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 28-50136. CI: De
Villiers (1929a); Power (1927a); Van Dijk (1966).
327
Xenopus
Pseudis
DIVERSITY
Chaparana: CO: 6. GR: India-Chna. EMG: exotroph: lotic: clasping. LTRE 8(3-8)/
3. OA: typicai: ventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP: few ventrolaterdy and in
a row distai to P-3. DEM: absent. NA. -. VT: dextral. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ:
medium, wide smooth arc. LJ: wide, V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body
junction. BS: ovai/depressed CP: uniformiy dark. TL: -. CI: C.-C. Liu and H u (1961).
Conraua: CO: 6. GR: tropical sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lotic: clasping.
LTRF: 7(5-7)/7(1), 8(5-8)/9, 14(7-14)/12(1-2). OA: typicai: ventral. MP: narrow
dorsai gap: biserial at least ventrdy. SUP: abundant lateray and distai to posterior rows.
DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai. UJ:
wide, mediai edge straight, exceptionay long processes laterally. LJ: medium, V-shaped.
DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP:
body dorsum spotted, dorsum of taii muscle lightly banded. TL: 45-60134. CI: Lamotte
et ai. (1959a); Lamotte and Zuber-Vogeli (1954a); Sabater-Pi (1985).
Discodebs: CO: 5. GR: Solomon Islands. EMG: endotroph.
Euhyjlossa: CO: 1. GR: Thaiiand. Tadpole unknown.
Euphhctis: CO: 4. GR: Arabia-Sri Lanka-Malaysia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 1/2[1]. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal arid medium ventrai gaps:
uniseriai. SUP: few laterdy. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP:
dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, edge a smooth arc. LJ: medium, V-shaped. DF: low,
originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: tail and
body striped. TL: 35/36. CI: Annandaie and Rao (1918); Kirtisinghe (1957).
Hildebrantia: CO: 3. GR: Ethiopia-Mozambique. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 012. OA: typicai: anteroventrd. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniserial, widely spaced.
SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: equidistant between snout and eye. VT: mediai. EP:
dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, massive with mediai convexity. LJ: wide, massive, open
U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip pointed and attenuate.
BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformiy dark. TL: 95/36. CI: Van Dijk (1966); Wager
(1986).
H~lobatrachus:CO: 5. GR: Angola-Ethiopia-southern Asia-Chia. EMG: exotroph:
lentic: carnivore; lotic: carnivore. LTRF: 4(34)/4(1-2), 5(3-5)/5(1). OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: complete: uniseriai. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than
snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, prorninently medidy incised. LJ:
wide, prominently medidy incised. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction.
BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniformly brown. TL: 43/30. NO: M. A. Smith (1917) discussed variations and nonconcordance among sources that suggest other species are involved. CI: Annandaie and Rao (1918); Lamotte and Zuber-Vogeli (1954a); M. A.
Smith (1917).
Huia: CO: 4. GR: China-southeastern Asia-Greater Sundas. EMG: exotroph: lotic:
gastromyzophorous. LTRP: several variations between 518 arid 1116. OA: typicai: suaoriai. MP: usudy wide dorsai gap. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA. nearer eye than
snout. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide, M-shaped. LJ: wide, V-shaped.
DF: low, originates on taii posterior to dorsai taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/
depressed CP: dark gray with paie spots, taii dark with paie spots at margins. TL: 681
39. NO: ventrai h originates on tail muscle, transverse keratinized patch on roof of
sucker, clusters of glands on body, buccai papiiiae may be distinctive among Amo@,
Huia, and Meriscogenys (Inger 1985). CI: Inger (1966); Yang (1991)
Indirana: CO: 9. GR: India. EMG: exotroph: lentic: semiterrestriai. LTRP: 5(2-5)/
3(1). OA: typicai: ventrai. MP: wide (entire upper labium) dorsai gap: uniserial. SUP:
none. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai.
UJ: wide, strongly arched. LJ: strongly arched. DF: low, originates on taii muscle, tip
rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: taii muscle banded. TL: 31/33. CI: Annandaie
(1918); Dubois (1985).
Ingerana: CO: 8. GR: western China-Thaiiand-BornewPhilippines. EMG: endotroph.
Lanzarana: CO: 1. GR: Somalia. Tadpole unknown.
Lzmnonectes: CO: 62. GR: China-Southeast Asia-Phiiippines. EMG: exotroph: lotic:
benthic; lentic: benthic. LTRF: 1/3(1), 1/4(1), 2(2)/3[1]. OA. typical: anteroventrd.
MP: wide dorsai gap: papiiiae often with elongate basal areas, narrow ventral gap some-
times present. SUP: few lateraiiy. DEM: absent. NA. nearer snout than eye or reverse.
VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to mediurn, smooth arc or slight medial convexity. LJ: narrow to medium, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal
tail-body junction, tip rounded to pointed. BS: ovalJdepressed. CP: variable, un&orm to
prorninently spotted/mottied. TL: 2540136. CI: Inger (1954, 1966, 1985).
Menjtogenys: CO: 9. GR: Borneo. EMG: exotroph: lotic: gastromyzophorous. LTRF:
several variations between 616 and 817. OA: typical: suctorial. MP: complete: uniserial,
reduced to crenulations dorsaiiy, lateral papillae may be larger than elsewhere. SUP: few
laterdy. DEM: absent, but folds for expansion of the disc present. NA: nearer eye than
snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: broadly divided, constructed of few
cellular palisades (= ribbed). LJ: ribbed and sometimes broken mediaiiy. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: mottled, ins
with lide pigment. TL: 3040/36. NO: ventral in originates on tail muscle, slun glands
present (e.g., behind eye, midlaterdy, sometimes on tail); keratinized areas in roof of
sucker. CI: Inger (1985); Yang (1991).
MicnXalus: CO: 6. GR: India. Tadpole unknown.
Nannupbrys: CO: 3. GR: Sri Lanka. EMG: exotroph: lotic: semiterrestrial. LTRF: 2(2)/
3(1). OA: typical: ventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial, very s m d ventrdy. SUP:
absent. DEM: absent. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: wide, strongly arched, coarsely serrate. LJ: wide, strongly arched, coarsely serrate.
DF: very low, originates well posterior to dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS:
oval/depressed. CP: mottied. TL: 27/38. NO: ventral fin originates on tail muscle, eyes
bulge noticeably, hind legs develop precociously relative to front legs and general development. CI: B. T. Clarke (1983); Kirtisinghe (1958).
Nannorana: CO: 3. GR: China. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 3(2-3)/3(1).
OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: uniserial. SUP: throughout lateral and
ventrolateral areas. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant between snout and eye. VT: sinistral.
EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, edge a smooth arc. LJ: wide, U-shaped. D E low,
originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. CP: uniformly
dark. TL: 36/36. CI: C.-C. Liu and H u (1961).
Nyctibatracbus: CO: 10. GR: India. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic. LTRF: 010. OA:
typica: anteroventral. MP: complete: uniserial. SUP: scattered throughout disc. DEM:
dorsolateral and midventra. NA: nearer to eye than snout. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP:
sinistral. UJ: narrow, smooth arc. LJ: narrow, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates posterior of dorsal tail-body junction, tip bluntly pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: dark
mottling, tail muscle banded. TL: 52/36. NO: see Rao (1923). CI: Pillai (1978).
Occiqyga: CO: 2. GR: Southeast Asia-Java. EMG: exotroph: lentic: carnivore. LTRF:
010. OA: oral disc and papdiae reduced to fleshy rim, jaw sheaths recessed. MP: dorsal
gap in fleshy, nonpapdlate rim, smaii rounded flap middorsdy. SUP: absent. DEM:
absent. NA: equidistant between eyes and snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: -. LJ: distinctly U-shaped deeply semilunar in shape. DF: anterior portion prominently high, drops abruptly with remainder low, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP:
black stripe through eye, tail variegated. TL: 30-50136. CI: Inger (1985); M. A. Smith
(1916b).
Paa: CO: 26. GR: India-Southeast Asia-China. EMG: exotroph: lotic: clasping. LTRF:
4(2-4)/3(1), 7(3-7)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium dorsai gap: uniserial.
SUP: laterdy and below P-3. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral.
EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, smooth arc. LJ: wide, smooth arc, open U-shaped.
DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip round. BS: oval/depressed. CP:
body uniformly dark, tail iighter with flecking. TL: 55/36. CI: Annandaie (1912); C.-C.
Liu and H u (1961).
Palmatorappia: CO: 1. GR: Solomon Islands. EMG: endotroph.
Pbrynoyghssus: CO: 9. GR: Southeast Asia-East Indies. EMG: exotroph: lentic: carnivore. LTRF: 010. OA: oral disc and papiiiae reduced to fleshy rim, jaw sheaths recessed.
MP: dorsai gap in fleshy, nonpapillate rim. SUP: absent. DEM: absent. NA: equidistant
between eyes and snout. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: -. LJ: deeply semilunar in shape. DF: low, originates posterior to dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed.
BS: oval/depressed. CP: black marks form scdoped appearance along margins of fins.
DIVERSITY
TL: 51/36. NO: snout noticeably pointed, lower lip sometimes visible from above, othenvise similar to Occzhzy~a.CI: Inger (1985); M. A. Smith (1916b).
Pl~ztymantis:CO: 39. G R Fiji-New Guinea-Phiiippines-China. EMG: endotroph.
Ptychdna: CO: 40. GR: sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
3(2-3)/2, 3(2)/2, 2(2)/2, 112. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: medium to wide dorsal
gap: uni- and biserial. SUP: few lateraliy, row below distai most lower row. DEM: absent. NA: nearer snout than eye, or reverse. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ:
wide, medial convexity. LJ: wide, open U-shaped. DF: low with slight arc, originates
near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed. BS: ovalJdepressed. CP: muted but variable.
TL: 30-55136. CI: Lamotte et al. (1958); Lamotte et al. (1959b); Lamotte and Perret
(1961a); Van Dijk (1966); Wager (1986).
Pyxicephalus: CO: 2. GR: sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
5(3-5)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: multiserial laterally, biserial
ventraliy. SUP: few laterally DEM: lateral. NA: near eye than snout. VT: medial. EP:
dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, medial convexity. LJ: medium, open U-shaped. DF: medium with slight arc, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip bluntly pointed. BS:
ovalJdepressed. CP: uniformly dark. TL: 70136. NO: schools, sometimes in midwater
and with other species. CI: Power (1927a); Van Dijk (1966).
Rana: CO: 224. GR: widespread. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic; lotic: benthic, clasping, gastromyzophorous; endotroph. LTRF: many variations between 112 and 918,213
is common in North America, n/3 common elsewhere. OA: typical: anteroventral, ventral. MP: dorsal gap: usualiy uniserial, more rarely a narrow ventral gap, ventral papillae
may be elongate. SUP: few laterally, absent. DEM: lateral, absent. NA: nearer eye than
snout or reverse. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow to wide, smooth arc,
medial part of edge straight. LJ: narrow to wide, narrow V-open U-shaped. DF: low,
originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip pointed to round. BS: ovalJdepressed. CP:
variable. TL: 30-100136. NO: a number of species groups have distinctive morphologies. CI: Boulenger (1892); Hilhs (1982); Hillis and Frost (1985); Hdhs and De S
(1988); Lanza (1983); Scott and Jemings (1985); A. H. Wright and Wright (1949);
Zweifel (1958).
Staurois: CO: 3. G R Borneo-Philippines. EMG: exotroph: lotic: burrower. LTRF:
2(2)/9(1). OA: typicai: ventral. MP: wide dorsal and narrow ventral gap: uniserial dorsolaterally, biserial ventraliy. SUP: few dorsolateraliy. DEM: lateral. NA: smali, much
nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: narrow, wide arc. LJ:
medium, open V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-bodyjunction, tip rounded.
BS: ovalJdepressed. CP: very lightly pigmented, skin appears shiny. TL: 32/31. NO:
convergent on the general centrolenid morphology, eyes particularly smali. CI: Inger and
Tan (1990); Inger and Wassersug (1990).
Taylorana: CO: 2. GR: India-Vietnam-Java. EMG: endotroph.
Tomoptema: CO: 13. GR: India-sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic.
LTRF: 3(2-3)/3, 4(2-4)/3. OA: typical: anteroventral. MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial,
except uniserial midventraiiy. SUP: few lateraliy. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than
snout or reverse. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: wide, massive with medial
convexity. LJ: wide, massive, open U-shaped. DF: low, originates at dorsal tail-bodyjunction, tip pointed. BS: ovalJdepressed. CP: uniforrnly dark. TL: 3644136. CI: GriUitsch
et al. (1988); Van Dijk (1966); Wager (1986).
RHACOPHORIDAE: CO: 121292. G R Africa-India-southeastern Asia. EMG: exotroph:
lentic: benthic, arboreal, nektonic; lotic: benthic, clasping, suaorial; endotroph. LTRF: many
variations between 110 and 813; n/3 most common. OA: typical: anteroventral or terminal.
MP: wide dorsal gap, sometimes narrow ventral gap or complete: uni-, bi-, and multiserial.
SUP: absent, lateraliy or below P-3, row(s) centripetal to marginal papiiiae. DEM: lateral,
absent. NA: nearer snout than eye or reverse. VT: dextral, medial. EP: dorsal, lateral. SP:
sinistral. UJ: variable including wide, medial margin straight or smooth arc coarsely serrate
or not, absent. LJ: medium to wide, U- to V-shaped, coarsely serrate or not, sometimes smali
medial convexity. DF: low to moderately high, originates near dorsal tail-body junction, tip
rounded to pointed. BS: round, oblong or ovalJdepressed. CP: variable. TL: 25-90136.
Buergeriinae: CO: 114. G R China-Japan. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic; lotic: benthic.
Wchadena
Mantidaqlus; M. 0pqat-m
LTRF: 5(2-5)/34(1), 6(3-6)/4(1). OA: typicai: anteroventrai.MP: wide dorsai gap: uniseriai. SUP: row(s) centripetal to most marginal papillae. DEM: lateral. NA. nearer snout
than eye or reverse. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. U J:wide, mediai margin straight,
coarsely serrate. LJ: medium, V-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF: low, originates near dorsai
taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oblong/depressed. CP: iightly pigmented with flecks
and spots on tad. TL: 30-44136.
Buegeria: CO: 4. GR: China-Japan. CI: Maeda and Matsui (1989); Okada (1931);
Utsunomiya and Utsunomiya (1983).
Mantellinae: CO: 2/68. GR: Madagascar.
Mantella: CO: 10. GR: Madagascar. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreai. LTRF:
3(2-3)/3,5(2-5)/3[1]. OA: typicai: anteroventrai.MP: wide dorsai gap: uniseriai dorsolaterdy, biseriai ventrolaterdy. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye.
VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, smooth arc. LJ: medium, open Vshaped. DF: low, tip rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: uniforrnly dark. TL: 20-30136.
CI: Arnoult (1965); Blommers-Schlosser and Blanc (1991); Glaw and Vences (1992).
Mantidactylus: CO: 58. GR: Madagascar. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic, arboreai; lotic: benthic, psarnmonic, umbeiiiform; endotroph. LTRF: a number of variations between 010 and 613. OA: typicai: anteroventrai, terminal, ventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap:
uniseriai, s m d ventrai gap less common, complete. SUP: few laterdy, row below P-3.
DEM: lateral, absent. NA: dose to snout then eye and reverse. UJ: absent, narrow to
wide, smooth arc, sometimes with mediai convexity, serrations fine to coarse, one species
with no basai sheath and serrations elongated into series of spikelike projections. LJ:
narrow to wide, V-shaped, spikelike projections. DF: tip pointed, sometimes proximai
part low with a prominent increase in height more posteriorly. BS: ovai/depressed. CP:
quite variable, often uniformiy dark. TL: 25-70136. NO: M. lugubrzs without labiai teeth
but pigmented stniaures in rows on lower labium look iike labiai teeth. CI: Arnoult and
Razarihelisoa (1967); Blommers-Schlosser and Blanc (1991); Glaw and Vences (1992).
Rhacophorinae: CO: 91220. GR: Africa-Madagascar-Seycheiie Islands-India-southeastern Asia.
Aglrptodactylus: CO: 1. GR: Madagascar. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
6(2-6)/3(1). OA: typical: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap: uniseriai. SUP: absent.
DEM: lateral. NA: nearer eye than snout. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistral. UJ:
wide, mediai edge straight. LJ: wide, U-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body
junction, tip round. BS: ovai/slightly depressed. CP: paie with reticulations on taii. TL:
25/36. CI: Blommers-Schlosser and Blanc (1991); Glaw and Vences (1992).
Boophis: CO: 37. GR: Madagascar. EMG: exotroph: lotic: benthic, clasping, suctoriai;
lentic: benthic. LTRF: 3(2-3)/3, 5(2-5)/3(1), 6(2-6)/3[1], 6(3-6)/3(1), 7(2-7)/3(1),
75-7)/3, 8(3-8)/3,8(5-8)/3. OA: typicai: anteroventrai, ventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap,
sometimes narrow ventrai gap, uncommonly complete: uni- and biseriai. SUP: common
laterdy and below P-3. DEM: lateral, absent. NA: various sites. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai.
SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium to wide and various shapes, absent. LJ: medium to wide,
various shapes. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip pointed to
rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: variable mottled. TL: 30-90136. CI: BlommersSchiosser (1979b); Blommers-Schiosser and Blanc (1991); Glaw and Vences (1992).
Chimiafus: CO: 8. GR: Southeast Asia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreai. LTRF:
5(2-5)/3, 4(24)/3(1), 212. OA: typicai: terminal or anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai
gap: multi- or uniseriai midventrdy, narrow ventral gap. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral,
absent. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextrai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium,
massive construction, smooth arc. LJ: medium, V-shaped. DF: low, originates at dorsai
tail-bodyjunction, tip slightly rounded. BS: ovai/depressed. CP: siightly speckled on taii,
uniformiy dark, distal part of tail dark. TL: 30141. NO: C. ezjinderi oophagous. CI:
Bourret (1942); Heyer (1971); Kam et ai. (1996); Kurarnoto and Wang (1987); Utsunomiya and Utsunomiya (1983).
Chiromantis: CO: 3. GR: sub-Saharan Africa. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF:
3(2-3)/3, 5(2-5)/3. OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap, narrow ventrai
gap: uniseriai dorsolaterdy and biseriai ventrdy. SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA. s m d ,
nearer snout than eye. VT: mediai. EP: dorsai. SP: sinistrai. UJ: medium, smooth arc.
LJ: narrow, V-shaped. DF: low, originates near dorsai taii-body junction, tip pointed.
DIVERSITY
BS: oval/depressed. CP: u d o r d y paie with blotches on taii. TL: 45-55/34. CI: Lamotte and Perret (1963a); Van Dijk (1966).
NyctkaLus: CO: 5. GR: Greater Sundas-Philippines. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreai.
LTRE 5(2-5)/3, 5(3-5)/3. OA: typicai: anteroventrai. MP: wide dorsai gap: biseriai.
SUP: absent. DEM: lateral. NA: equidistant between eye and snout, smaii medial projection. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medial convexity, coarsely serrate. LJ:
medlurn, V-shaped, coarsely serrate. DF: low, originates near dorsal mil-body junction,
tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed. TL: 43/26. CP: unifordy purplish brown. CI: Alcala
and Brown (1982); Inger (1966, 1985).
Philautus: CO: 87. GR: India-China-Philippines. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreal; endotroph. LTRP: 110. OA: typical: terminal. MP: complete: biserial. SUP: -. DEM:
lateral. NA: tiny, nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistrai. UJ: wide,
without serrations. LJ: wide, coarsely serrate. DF: low, originates near dorsal tail-body
junction, tip rounded. BS: oval/depressed, widest near plane of eyes, snout truncate. CP:
unifordy paie brown. TL: 29/37. CI: Wassersug et ai. (1981a).
Polpedutes: CO: 19. GR: India-China-Japan-southeastern Asia-Phhppines. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthic. LTRF: 4(24)/3[1.], 5(2-5)/3[:1]. OA: typical: anteroventral.
MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial, narrow ventral gap. SUP: few lateraiiy, throughout extent
of marginal papillae, absent. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP:
dorsai, lateral. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium, high smooth arc, medial convexity. LJ: medium, open V-shaped. DF: moderately high, originates near dorsal td-body junaion, tip
pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP: variable. TL: 2545136. NO: Inger (1966) shows tail
sheath (see text chap. 3) in l?macrotis and l? otiiuphus. CI: Inger (1985).
Rhacuphoms: CO: 51. GR: India-China-Celebes Islands. EMG: exotroph: lentic: benthc, nektonic. LTRF: 4(2-3)/3(1), 5(2-5)/3[1]. OA: typicai: anteroventral. MP: wide
dorsal gap: biserial, sometimes s m d ventral gap. SUP: absent, few laterally. DEM: lateral. NA: nearer snout than eye. VT: dextral. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral. UJ: medium to
wide, smooth arc or smaii medial convexity. LJ: medium to wide, V-shaped. DF: low to
medium, originates near dorsal taii-body junction, tip pointed. BS: oval/depressed. CP:
usudy unicolored, often pale. TL: 3545136. CI: Inger (1966, 1985).
Tbelodema: CO: 9. GR: Burma-Malaysia. EMG: exotroph: lentic: arboreal. LTRF:
4(24)/4(1). OA: typical: nearly terminal. MP: wide dorsal gap: biserial. SUP: absent.
DEM: lateral. NA: s m d , nearer snout than eye. VT: medial. EP: dorsal. SP: sinistral.
UJ: medium, medial convexity, coarsely serrate. LJ: wide, more finely serrate, open Ushaped. DF: medium, erupts abruptly from near dorsal td-body junction, tip broadly
rounded. BS: round/depressed. CP: unifordy dark. TL: 28/28. CI: Wassersug et ai.
(1981a).
Polrpedates
fiivwpbrynus
334
DIVERSITY
335
Summary
Severai interesting things came out of our attempt to characterize the morphologicai variation represented among ali
genera and families of anuran tadpoles. The use of a standard African: Sooglossidae, Heleophrynidae, Hemisotidae, Microhylidae, Arthroleptidae, Pipidae, Rhacophoridae, Bufonidae, Ranidae,
format and terminology gave us a much better appreciation
and ~ ~ ~ e r o l i i d a e
of the distribution of Iamal traits among living frogs. This Austropapuan:
Ranidae, Hylidae, and Myobatrachidae
summation also uncovered the types of gaps in our knowl- Nearctic: Ascaphidae, Rhinophqmdae, Leptodactylidae, Microhyliedge. By our count, no information is available on the reprodae, Pelobatidae, Bufonidae, Ranidae, and Hylidae
duaive mode for 29 genera ( 8%) of frogs, and only four Neotropical: Rhinophrynidae, Pseudidae, Pipidae, Ranidae, Microhylidae, Bufonidae, Centrolenidae, Dendrobatidae, Leptodactylidae,
of these are reasonable candidates for endotrophy. Most
and Hylidae
(86%)of these 43 species are in monotypic genera, and a- Oriental: Bombinatoridae, Hylidae, Megophryidae, Microhylidae,Buing this gap has a high probability of uncovering different
fonidae, Rhacophoridae, and Ranidae
tadpole morphotypes. Although we currently do not know Palearaic: Pelodytidae, Pelobatidae, Hylidae, Bombinatoridae, Discoglossidae, Bufonidae, and Ranidae
the total number of different tadpoles that have been described, we know that those of many species in genera from
which some tadpoles are known remain to be discovered.
Given past findings, we are confident that some of these undiscovered forms also will provide new insights into tadpole if there are unworked larvai coiiections in some European
morphology. Whde this summation confirms that we know museums similar to the extensive holduigs of reptiles that
something about the reproduaive mode of most frog spe- were amassed during periods of European colonial occucies, the inclusion of data for a given taxon does not imply pancy of tropical Africa. If not, efforts should be made to
that comparable data are available for ali species in that genus overcome the logisticai and politico-economic problems that
nor that the recorded data necessarily are representative of too often make field work in these areas so difficult and astadpoles of ali included species. Less than a third of ali tad- semble new colleaions that are direaed specificaliy at the
poles have been described reasonably well, and the number tadpole fauna. To facilitate tadpole work there and in other
of entries that have no data, including endotrophs and exo- regions of the world, we have summarized (table 12.4) the
trophs, shows that much work remains. We have a reason- general distributions of anuran families as an aide to their
ably good foundation in certain aspects of tadpole morpho- identification and an adjuna to the comparative study of
logicai diversity, but there is much to learn.
tadpole morphology. The foiiowing key ais0 grew out of the
Another spin-off from t h s compilation was a better ap- summation and is intended not so much as an help to identipreciation of the geographical gaps in our knowledge. It fication (which it may be) but more as an iustration of the
seems clear to us that of the tropical regions of the world distribution, including notable cases of convergence, of a
where frog diversity is high, the tadpole fama of equatorial few major larvai traits among anuran families and subfamilAfrica stands out as one in need of much more study. ies. A taxa are not accounted for in every case, and the key
Whether a broader sampling of lamal morphology would could have been compiled in several ways (i.e., the same or
shed new light on ranoid phylogeny is debatable, but the different charaaers in different sequences). Even so, the confew glimpses we have had of morphologicai diversity and veyed message in each case would have been the same -taddevelopmental patterns characteristic of some arthroleptid poles in a few families can be keyed easily and those in antadpoles cry out for attention. We are not aware of much other large group of families cannot be separated based on
current interest in tadpoles from tropical Africa and wonder these few charaaers.
336
Seaion 2
Section 3
Seaion 4
Section 5
D IVE RS ITY
Section 8
Heleophrynidae
Rhacophoridae: Mantellinae (part)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Several persons helped with the preparation of this chapter
in different ways. K. Spencer's sketches of many of the distinctive tadpole morphotypes enhanced the diversity presentation immeasurably. The sketch of Leptobrachella was redrawn frorn Inger (1966) and is reprinted by permission of
Inger; the sketch of Nelsonophryne was redrawn from Donneiiy et ai. (1990a) and is reprinted courtesy of The Arneri-
Section 7
The glossary includes terms that may have been deined or restriaed by the terminology suggested in this book or are not
commonly found in other sources. Refer to chapters 2 and 3
for further discussion of many morphological terms. Pertinent
citations are often presented. Terms within a definition that are
defined elsewhere in the glossary are in boldface. Synonymous
terms that are accepted in this book are presented in parentheses, and unaccepted ones are presented in brackets. Uniess noted
othenvise, d staging notations pertain to Gosner (1960).
GLOSSARY
340
GLOSSARY
benthic [benthonic]. An ecomorphological guild that includes those lentic or lotic tadpoles that rasp food from
submerged surfaces with keratinized mouthparts; mostiy at
or near the bottom, pools and backwaters in lotic sites, body
depressed, eyes dorsal, fins low with rounded or slightiy
pointed tip, dorsal fin originates at or near the dorsal tailbody junction; see table 2.2, figures in chap. 12, adherent,
arboreal, carnivorous, clasping, fossorial, gastromyzmphorous, macrophagous, nektonic, neustonic, psammonic, rheophilous, semiterrestrial, suctorial, suspension feeder, and suspension rasper.
bicolored. Two colored, usually in reference to a lateral view of
a tail rnuscle that is dark dorsaily and pale ventrally.
biosocial aggregation. A general term that describes a group
of tadpoles that are congregated because of some social interaction, although qualities of a school (i.e., polarized orientation and coordinated movernents) are not implied; see aggregation, school, and taxic aggregation.
birth. (1) Release of some forrn of an immature individual fiom
the reproductive traa of its mother, including viviparous
and ovoviviparous arnphibians. (2) By extension, used for
the analogous release of a froglet frorn nonoviducal sites
(e.g.,Assa, Gdctrotheca, Rheobatrachus, and Rhivwdemza) in a
parent's body; see hatch.
biserial. Describes structures occurring in two series at a site,
as two rows of labial teeth per tooth ridge (e.g., some tooth
rows in Ascaphw and ail tooth rows in bornbinatorids and
discoglossids); see multiserial and uniserial.
blotch. Contrasting, usuaily dark, irregular marks of various
sizes and shapes with indistinct margins; larger and more irregular than a dot or spot; see mottled, punctate, and
steilate.
body. (1) [head-body] That part of a tadpole minus the ta*,
defined for rneasurernent as the straight iine distance frorn
the tip of the snout posteriorly to the body terminus; see
body length. (2) Poorly distinguishable part of a labial
tooth (Gosner 1959) between the head (working surface)
and sheath (embedded in tooth ridge).
body axis. Irnaginary iine in lateral view that extends from the
tip of the snout to the body terminus; used as a reference
for describing the relative locations of stmctures; see tail
axis.
body length [head-bodylength]. Straight iine, lateral measurernent frorn the tip of snout to the body terminus; see fig.
3.1 and tail length.
body ratio (Altig 1970). Total length divided by body length;
see tail length and tail ratio.
body terminus. Intersection of the posterior body wail and the
axis of the tail myotornes; most accurately describes body
length and tail length arnong diverse taxa in contrast to any
rneasurernent involving the vent tube; see chap. 3.
branchial arch(es). The three gill-supportingvisceral arches.
branchial food trap (Wassersug 1976a, b). Glandular region
between the ventral velurn and Mter plates of larval Types 3
and 4; see chap. 5.
buccal apparatus [oral apparatus]. AU structuresin the buccopharyngeal cavity taken as a unit; does not refer to any stmctures of the mouthparts.
buccal papia(e). Collective terrn for ail papillae in the buccal
cavity; see buccai apparatus.
buccopharynx, anterior and posterior. Collective term for the
buccal cavity (anterior) + pharynx (posterior).
carnivorous. An ecomorphologicai guild that includes those
lentic tadpoles that feed on rnacroinvertebratesand conspe-
GLOSSARY
cific and heterospecific tadpoles, either rasping the prey
apart or e n g u h g thern intact; keratinized mouthparts
present and usuaiiy rnodified; does not include opportunistic
scavenging of dead organisrns; see tables 2.2 and 10.2, figures in chap. 12, arboreai, benthic, macrophagous, nektonic, neustonic, suspension feeder, and suspension
rasDer.
cauda equina. The spinal nerves that exit the spinal cord near
the sacrum and then continue posteriorly as a series of fibers.
choana(e) (internal nares). Opening of the narial canal in the
roof of the buccopharynx.
chromatophore. Pigrnent-containing celis derived frorn neuroectoderm; pigrnents contained in specific organelies; see
blotch, dot, melanin, melanophore, mottied, punctate,
spot, and steiiate.
Eiliary cushion (Wassersug 1976a, b; chap. 5). In larval Types
3 and 4, at the dorsolateral pharynx, structures hanging between the ilter plates and consisting of ciiiary celis and goblet cells originating frorn the esophagus; structuraiiy like the
ciliary grooves and in close contact with thern; produces
and transports rnucus with entrapped food particles to the
esophagus.
ciliary groove (Wassersug 1976a, b; chap. 5). A horizontal
groove at the rnargin of the pharyngeal roof frorn the anterolateral corner of the ventral velum and eventuaiiy into the
esophagus; positioned laterdy in pipids and more posteriorly in larval Types 3 and 4; histology and function resembles the ciliary cushions.
dasping. h ecomorphological guiid that includes those lotic
tadpoles that iive in flowing water and have marginal papiilae with an anterior gap, LTRs comrnonly 5 but as numerous
as 818 and usuaiiy with anterior rows more numerou than
lower rows (e.g., 913); inhabit rnedium to slow currents, position rnaintenance via the oral disc minor; see table 2.2 and
figures in chap. 12, adherent, benthic, fossoriai, gastromyzophorous, nektonic, neustonic, psammonic, rheophilous, semiterrestriai, and suctorial.
dearance time. Period of time between ingestion of food and
elimination of feces derived frorn that food.
cold hardening. Accomrnodation to a brief exposure of low
ternperature near the lethal limit such that the individual is
more resistant to subsequent exposures to such ternperatures; see heat hardening.
complex life cycle. A life cycle in amphibians characterized by
two forrns separated by an abrupt shifi (= metamorphosis)
in behavior, ecology, rnorphology, and physiology.
compressed [laterdy cornpressed, depressed, or flattened]. Describes an imaginary cross-sectional view of a structure that
is higher than wide; usuaiiy used in reference to body shape;
see cyiindrical, depressed, fusiform, and globular.
concentration refuge. That concentration or density of food
below which a tadpole ceases to feed and thus the rernaining
prey survive and reproduce.
wntraiaterai. Occurring on the opposite side of the body; see
ipsilateral.
wnversion efficiency. Ratio of rnass of food ingested to body
rnass increase.
craniai nerve. One of about 14 nerves connected to the telencephalon (CNs O-I), midbrain (CNs 11-IV), and hindbrain
(CNs V-XII); absolute nurnber of cranial nerves is controversial; see spinai nerve.
crenulate. Describes an edge with a wavy margin as would be
produced by a series of weakly differentiated papiae; see
emarginate and incised.
34 1
342
GLOSSARY
fin [caudal or tail crest]. Unsupported flaps of epidermiscovered, loose connective tissue usually extending the length
of the dorsal and ventral edge of the tail muscle.
final thermal preferendum (FIT).Temperature ultimately selected by an individual regardless of prior thermal experience; usually measured within 24-96 hr after placement in a
thermal gradient.
flagellum (Altig and Johnston 1989) [filament]. Elongate posterior part of the tail that is often nonpigmented and ma!.
move independently of the remainder of the tail.
fluctuating selection. Adaptive value of a trait varies as a h c tion of varying abiotic and biotic conditions.
froglet. A small, sexually immature frog produced by either
metamorphosis of an exotrophic tadpole or by direct development. Metamorph is not applicable in the case of direct developing forms; see embryo, hatchling, immature,
juvenile, larva, metamorphic, metamorphic climax, premetamorphosis, and prometamorphosis.
fossorial. An ecomorphologicai guild that includes those
lotic, fusiform tadpoles that have marginal papillae with
an anterior gap, LTKF 2/3 or less, and inhabit leaf mats in
slow water areas; position maintenance via oral disc absent;
see table 2.2, figures in chap. 12, adherent, benthic, datping, semiterrestrial, g~stromyzophorous, nektomk,
neustonic, psamrnonic, rheophilous, and suctorial.
foliose. ~ o l i a i e or
- moss-like
or $hape of individual or
groups of chromatophores.
fracture plane. Suture-Zike area in the body of a labial tooth
where the head can break off of the sheath. The next replacement tooth (see tooth series) protrudes through the
sheath of the old tooth.
friction surface. Area that may be Gnely papillate, keratinized,
or both on the roof of the befly sucker of some gastromyzophorous tadpoles.
functional constraint. Limit to evolution by natural selection
caused by physical or mechanical laws.
funnel mouth. Has been used in reference to the upturned oral
disc of some surface feeders (= umbelliform) tadpoles and
the large, pendant (most easily visible in preserved specimens) oral discs of some lotic species; these usages should
be abandoned to enhance clarification among the mouthparts, oral disc, and mouth, also see suctorial.
fusiform [vermiform]. Describes the body shape of fossorial
tadpoles, extremely depressed with dorsal eyes, long tail,
and low furs; see compressed, cylindrical, depressed, and
globular.
ganglion. Enlargement in a nerve outside the central nervous
system where pre- and postganglionic axons synapse or cell
bodies of sensory nerves are located; see nucleus.
gap. Literally a break or discontinuityin a linear structure; used
in reference to breaks, usually medial, in a tooth row; see
A-2 gap and A-2 gap ratio.
gap ratio. See A-2 gap ratio.
gape limited. Describes a predator that cannot eat prey above
a maximum size set by the size of ~ t mouth;
s
see size refuge.
gas exchange partitioning. Partitioning of 0, uptake and CO,
elimination among available external gas exchange surfaces
(e.g., lungs, gills, skin, etc.) or between media (air and water).
gastromyzophorous. (1) Describes a tadpole that has the belly
modified into an actual sucker (= forms negative pressure),
like tadpoles of Amlops and Atelopus but not Tboropa and
Cyclor~bus,for position maintenance in fast and perhaps
turbulent water. An ecomorphological guild that includes
those lotic tadpoles that have such a modified belly; see table
GLOSSARY
343
344
GLOSSARY
GLOSSARY
metamorphosis. Process of a nidicolous endotrophic or exotrophic tadpole changing into a fioglet; most changes occur during stages 4 2 4 6 of Gosner (1960); other definitions
(chap. 2) are based on endocrinological data; often used in
synonymy with metamorphic climax; see metamorph,
metamorphic, premetamorphosis, and prometamorphosis.
minor metamorphosis. Metamorphic changes in morphology
and ecology characterized by minimai variation between larvai and postlarvai stages (i.e., salamander metamorphosis as
opposed to that of a frog).
monoculture. A population containing oniy a single species,
usually as a cultured population.
mottled. A color pattern formed by haphazard arrays of usually
dark streaks, lines, or blotches on a pale background or pale
markings on a dark background; see blotch, dot, punctate,
spot, and stellate.
mouth [oral apparatus, oral disc, and mouthparts (in referente to mouth]. Refers oniy to that opening formed by the
rupture of the oropharyngeai membrane to connea the
buccopharynx with the exterior; does not refer to any
mouthparts.
mouthparts (oral apparatus). Colleaive term for all sofi and
keratinized feeding structures largely external to the mouth
(e.g., labia and all associated structures, tooth ridges, labial
teeth, and jaw sheaths); does not refer to any strucnires in
the buccopharynx.
muciferous crypt [neuromast]. Refers to openings of unicellular glands but has also been used incorrectly in referente
to neuromasts; should be abandoned because of these confusing usages.
multiserial. Describes structures occurring in three or more series at a site, as tooth rows on a tooth ridge (e.g., some
rows ofRrcaphus) or marginal papillae; see biserial and uniserial.
muscle height (Altig and Johnston 1989). Maximum height
(verticai distance) measured from the junction of the body
wall and the ventral margin of the tail musculature; see
chap. 3.
muscle width (Altig and Johnston 1989). Maximum transverse
width of the tail muscle measured in dorsai view at the same
plane as muscle height.
naris, nares (nostrii). Usually refers to the externai openings
of the nasal canal; internal opening in the roof of the
buccopharynx is the choana(e) or internai nares.
nasolacrimal duct [lacrimal duct or gland, orbitonasal line]. A
d u a connecting the corner of the eye with the naris; appears
as a contrastingly pigmented line during its formation in
later stages of a tadpole.
nephrotome (nephromere, mesomere, intermediate plate).
That part of the mesodermic somite that develops into excretory organs.
negative Bohr shift. Increase in the affinity of hemoglobin (decreased P,,) associated with a decrease in blood pH, as opposed to the normally observed decrease in affinity (increased P,,) that accompanies an increase in the acidity of
the blood.
nektonic (pelagic). (1) An ecomorphological guild that includes those lentic or lotic tadpoles that rasp food from
submerged surfaces with keratinized mouthparts and do so
somewhere within the water column including quiet backwaters in lotic sites; body compressed, eyes lateral, fins
high with pointed tip with or without a flagellum; dorsal
fin ofien originates well anterior to dorsal tail-body junc-
345
346
GLOSSARY
GLOSSARY
neurons to appear in the spinal cord of anamniote vertebrates and persist in amphibians until metamorphosis.
routine metabolic rate. Metabolic rate of an ectotherm that is
acciimated to a specified temperature and exhibits normal activity.
Schieimkopfchenzeilen. "Mucous-headed cell" (chap. 5).
school [aggregation]. A specific form of congregated tadpoles
that involve some sort of social interaaion and exhibit at
least indications of polarized orientation and perhaps coordinated movements; see aggregation, biosocial aggregation,
and taxic aggregation.
scoptanura (Starrett 1973). Word synonym of Orton's (1953)
Type 2; microhyloid of O. M. Sokol (1975).
semiterrestrial [subaerial]. An ecomorphological guiid that
includes those lotic tadpoles that have marginal papiiiae
with an anterior gap; L T m usudy 213, jaw sheaths usudy
with a high and narrow arch; inhabit rock faces, leaves, and
the forest floor that provide damp or wet surfaces with little
free water; see table 2.2, figures in chap. 12, adherent, belly
flap, belly sucker, benthic, clasping, fossorial, gastromyzophorous, nektonic, neustonic, psarnmonic, rheophilous, and suctorial.
serration. Sawlike projections of various densities, orientations, shapes, sizes, and densities along the cutting edge of
the jaw sheaths; should not be used in reference to marginal papillae or labial teeth; see cusp.
sheath. Hollow, basal part of a labial tooth (Gosner 1959) embedded in the tissue of the tooth ridge; see head, body, taii
sheath, tooth row, and tooth series.
sinistral. To the left. (1) Describes a single spiracle on left side
(laevogyrinid); see amphigyrinid, laevogyrinid, mediogyrinid, and paragyrinid. (2) Describes a vent tube with
the aperture opening to the left of the plane of the ventral
h;
see dextral and medial.
size refuge. Avoidance of predation by the attainment of a body
size which reduces or eliminates predation by gape-limited
predators; see gape limited.
spinal nerve. One of 20-29 nerves that arises from the spinal
cord; typicdy formed by the confluence of a dorsal sensory
root and a ventral motor root; the number reduces to about
11 after metamorphosis; see cranial nerve.
spiracle [atrial opening; spout]. One or m o opening(s) of
different shapes and positions for the exit of the water
pumped into through the buccopharynx for respiration and
feeding; not homologous with the elasmobranch spiracle;
see amphigyrinid, laevogyrinid, mediogyrinid, paragyrinid, and sinistral.
spot. Dark, pigmented mark with relatively even margins but
larger than a dot and more rounded and discrete than a
bltch; see mottled, punctate, and steilate.
standard metabolic rate (SMR). Metabolic rate of an ectothenn under resting conditions and acclimated to a specified
temperame; equivalent to basal metabolic ratc of mammals.
stellate. (1) Describes a pigmented mark that is roughly starshaped or at least has multiple projections from a central region. (2) An individual chromatophore that is simiiarly
star-shaped; see blotch, dot, spot, mottled, and punctate.
Sternzellen. See Kupffer cell (chap. 5).
Stiftchenzellen. "pin-cells" (chap. 5).
submarginal papiila(e) (Altig 1970) [extramarginal, infralabial, inner or retromarginal papiae]. Fleshy projection(s)
anywhere on the face of the oral disc except the margin and
perhaps some other places in tadpoles that lack jaw sheaths
(e.g., at the sites where jaw sheaths would be expected to
occur); see barbel, marginal papilla, and papilla.
347
348
GLOSSARY
per site, as one row of labial teeth per tooth ridge (e.g.,
most tadpoles); see biserial and multiserial.
Urwirbelfortsatz. Primordial vertebral process; see chap. 4.
velum (Wassersug 1976a, b; chap. 5). Glandular organ between
the buccal cavity and the pharynx that regulates water flow
into the Ioharvnx.
vent [mal opening, anus]. Posterior intestinal opening of a
tadpole. Because arnphibians have a doaca, this opening is
not an anus, and ali referentes as such should be omitted;
see vent flap and vent tube.
vent flap [mal flap]. Fleshy flap of various shapes that extends
from the body w d posteriorly and ventral to the vent tube.
Sometimes encloses the hind limb buds and occurs most
commonly in rheophiious tadpoles.
vent tube [anal or cloacal tube, mal tube piece, cloacal taii
piece, proctodaeal tube]. A tube for voiding of feces with
many variations in morphology; projeas from the body
wall distally to an opening that may lie parallel with the
plane of the ventral h (medial) or to the left (sinistrai)
or right (dextral) of that plane. In a few cases, the tube
does
not exit the body on the sagittai lhe; see vent and vent
flap.
ventral body terminus. See body terminus and taii-body
junction.
visceral arch. Cartilaginous or bony bars of the visceral skeleton, including the mandibular arch (= mandibulare and palatoquadratum), hyoid arch, and three branchial arches.
visceral pouch. Pharyngeal (endodermal) evaginations between the visceral arches from which the Eustachian,tubeis
derived; pouches 2-4 open as gill slits; the ilter plate anlagen and the branchiogene endocrines are derived from this
endoderm.
viviparous (Altig and Johnston 1989). (1) Developmental
mode of a frog which results in a larva (= fetus) that develops by consurning maternally derived, oviducal materiais
after the exhaustion of viteiiogenic yolk. (2) An ecomorphological guild that includes species that have viviparou
development; see table 2.2, figures in chap. 12, direct development, endotrophy, exotrophy, exoviviparous, nidicolous, ovoviviparous, and paraviviparous.
VO,. A measure of the volume of 0, consumed per unit time;
see PO,.
whole-body 0, conductance. Change in the rate at which 0,
can be consumed by a metabolic 0, regulator per unit
+ange in ambient PO,; equivalent to the slope of a plot of
VOZagainst ambient PO, in the range of metabolic 0, conformity.
xenoanura (Starrett 1973). Word synonym of Oaon's (1953)
Type 1tadpole; pipoid of O. M. Sokol(1975).
i
LITERATURE CITED
Abe, A. S., and H. P. Godinho. 1991. Tolerante to high temperatures in tadpoles of L~ptoductylus~scus
and Hyh@cwaria in temporary ponds (Arnphibia, Leptodactylidae, Hylidae). 2001.
Anz. 226:280-284.
Abelson, A., T. Miloh, and Y. Loya. 1993. Flow pattems induced by substrata and body morphologies of benthic organisms, and their roles in deterrnining availability of food
particles. Limnul. Oceanograph. 38: 1116-1 124.
Abraham, M. H., and C. Rafols. 1995. Factors that influence
tadpole narcosis. An LFER anaiysis.J. Chem. Soc. 10:18431851.
Abravaya, J. P., and J. F. Jackson. 1978. Reproduction inMacrogenwjlottus alipwi Carvalho (Anura: Leptodactyiidae). Nat.
Hist. Mus. LosAngeles Co. Contrib. Sci. (298):1-9.
Accordi, F., and P. Cianfoni. 1981. Histology and ultrastructure
of the adrenai gland of Rhaaphomts ieucomystax (Arnphibia,
Anura). Boll. 2001.48:277-284.
Accordi, F., and E. Grassi-Milano. 1977. Catecholaminesecreting ceils in the adrenai gland of Buf0 buj during metamorphosis and in the aduit. Gen. Comp. Endom'ml. 33:
187-195.
. 1990. Evolution and developmentof the adrenai gland
in amphibians. pp. 257-268. In Biology andphyswlogy of amphibians. Progress in wology 38. Proc. FirstIntl. Symp. Bwl. Physwl.Amphibians, Karlsruhe, Federai Republic of Germany, edited by W. Hanke. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer-Verlag.
Adams, M. J., K. L. Richter, and W. P. Leonard. 1997. Surveying and monitoring amphibians using aquatic funnel traps.
pp. 47-54. In Sampling amphibiam in lentic habitats, edited
by D. H. Olson, W. P. Leonard, and R B. Bury. Northwest
Fauna Number 4 Society for Northwestem Vertebrate Biology, Olyrnpia, WA.
Adamson, L., R. G. Harrison, and I. Bayley. 1960. The development of the whistiing frog E i e u t h e r o ~ l u srm~~nicensis
of Barbados. Proc. 2001.
Soc. Lundun 133:453469.
Adamson, M. L. 1981a. Gjnniwh batrachiensis (Waiton, 1929)
n. comb. (Oxyuroidea; Nematoda) frorn tadpoles in eastern
and central Canada. CanuianJ.2001.59: 1344-1 350.
. 1981b. Seasonai changes in populations of Gjnnzwh
batrachiensis (Waiton 1929) in wild tadpoles. Canadian J.
2001.
59: 1377-1386.
Adler, K. 1970. The role of extraoptic photoreceptors in amphibian rhythrns and orientation: A review. J. Herpetol.
4:99-112.
. 1976. Extraocular photoreception in amphibians. Photachem. Photobwl. 23:275-298.
Adolph, E. F. 1931. The size of the body and the size of the
environment in the growth of tadpoles. Bwl. Bull.
61:350-375.
Ma'a, F. M. 1979. Nyctositum ameita, n. gen., n. sp., an endocomensai ciliate of tadpoles ofAcanthixalusspzmsus. Protistologica 15:333-336.
. 1983. Neonyctothms (Ciiiophora, Heterotrichida), a
new genus comensai in amphibian tadpoles (Anura) from
Cameroons. Protistologica 19:141-147.
Af'ia'a, F. M., and J.-L. Arniet. 1994. Progrs rcents dan Ia connaissance des Nyctothres (Protozoaires, Ciiis, Htrotriches) associs aux Anoures. Alytes 12:75-92.
Agarwal, S. K., and I. A. Niazi. 1980. Development of the
mouth-parts in the tadpoles of Rana t@na (Daud.). Proc.
IndianaAcad. Sci. 89: 127-131.
Aggarwai, S. J., and A. Riggs. 1969. The hemoglobins of the
bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana I. Purification, m i n o acid composition, and oxygen equi1ibria.J. Bwl. Chem. 244:2372-2383.
350
LITERATURE CITED
. 1994. Interferente and exploitation competition in larval Bufo marinus. pp. 297-306. In Advances in ecology and environmental sciences, edited by P. C. Mishra, N. Behera, B. K.
Senapati, and B. C. Gum. New Deihi: Ashish Publ. House,
New Deihi.
Aiford, R. A., and M. L. Cmmp. 1982. Habitat partitioning
among size classes of larval southern leopard frogs, Rana
utn'cularia. Copeia 1982:367-373.
Alford, R. A,, and R. N. Harris. 1988. Effeas of larval growth
history on anuran metamorphosis. American Nat.
131:91-106.
A h r d , R. A., and G. D. Jackson. 1993. Do cephalopods and
the larvae of other taxa grow asymptotically?American Nat.
141:717-728.
Aiford, R. A., and H. M. Wilbur. 1985. Priority effects in experimental pond communities: Competition between Bufo
and Rana. Ecology 66: 1097-1105.
Aiiey, K. E., and M. D. Barnes. 1983. Birth dates of trigeminal
motoneurons and metamor~hicreorganization of the iaw
myoneuronal system in frigs. J. comp.Neurol. 218:395405.
Aison, J. D. 1992. Acoustic modulation of neural activity in
the preoptic area and ventral hypothalamus of the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea).J Comp.Physwl. 171A:387-395.
Ai-Mukthar, K . A. K., and A. C. Webb. 1971. An ultrastructural study of primordial germ celis, oogonia, and early oocytes in Xevwpus laevi5.J.Embtyol. Exp. Morphol. 26: 195-21 7.
Altig, R. 1970. A key to the tadpoles of the continental United
States and Canada. Herpetologca 26:180-207.
. 1972. Notes on the larvae and premetaniorphic tadpoles of four Hyla and three Rana with notes on tadpole
color patterns.J ElzshaMitchell Sci. Soc. 88:113-119.
. 1973. Preliminary scanning electron observations of
keratinized stmctures in amphibian larvae. HISS News-J.
1:129-131.
. 1975. Freeze-drying anuran tadpoles for taxonomic exaniinations. Hqetol. Ra7 6: 13.
. 1987. Key to the anuran tadpoles of Mexico. Southwest.
Nat. 32:75-84.
Aitig, R., and R. A. Brandon. 1971. Generic key and synopsis
for free-living larvae and tadpoles of Mexican amphibians.
Tulane Stud. 2001.
Bot. 17: 10-1 5.
Altig, R., and E. D. Brodie, Jr. 1972. Laboratory behavior of
Ascaphw truei tadpoles. J Hqetol. 6:21-24.
Aitig, R., and A. Channing. 1993. Hypothesis: Functional significance of colour and pattern of anuran tadpoles. Hqetol.
J. 3:73-75.
Aitig, R., and M. T. Christensen. 1981. Behavioral characteristics of the tadpoles of Rana heckscheri. J Herpetol.
15:151-154.
Aitig, R., and G. F. Johnston. 1986. Major characteristics of
free-living anuran tadpoles. Smithsonian Herpetol. Info. Sem.
(67):1-75.
. 1989. Guilds of anuran larvae: Relationships arnong
developmental modes, morphologies, and habitats. Hqetul.
Monogr: (3):81-109.
Aitig, R., and J. l? Keliy. 1974. Indices of feeding in anuran tadpoles as indicated by gut characteristics. Herpetulogica
30:200-203.
Altig, R., and W. ~McDearman.1975. Clearance times and per
cent assimilation of five species of anuran tadpoles. Hqetuhgica 3 1:67-69.
Aitig, R., and W. L. Pace. 1974. Scanning electron photomicrographs of tadpole labial teeth. J Herpetol. 8:247-25 1.
-
LITERATURE CITED
Altman, J. S., and E. A. Dawes. 1983. A cobalt study of medullary sensory projections from lateral iine nerves associated
with cutaneous nerves, and the VIIIth nerve in adult =nopus.J. Comp.Neurol. 213:310-326.
Aivarado, R. H., and T. C. Cox. 1985. Action of polyvalent cations on sodium transport across skin of larval and adult Rana
catesbeiana.J. Exp. 2001.236: 127-136.
Aivarado, R. H., and S. R. Johnson. 1966. The effects of neurohypophysial hormones on water and sodium balance in larvai and adult bullfiogs (Rana cutesbeiana). Comp. Biochem.
Physwl. 18A:549-561.
Alvarado, R. H., and A. Moody. 1970. Sodium and chloride
transport in tadpoles of the bullfiog Rana catesbeiana.AmericanJ.Physwl. 218:1510-1516.
Amboroso, E. C. 1968. The evolution of viviparity. Pwc. Roy.
Soc.Med. 61:1188-1200.
Amer, F. I. 1968-1969. On the occurrence and nature of Bidder's organ in the Egyptian toad, Bufo regztlaris Reuss. 2001.
Soc. Egypt Bull. 21:39-62.
. 1972. Observations on the urinogenid ducts of the
Egyptian toad, BufO r g u l a k Reuss. 501.
Soc. Ejypt BuU.
24:15-19.
-.
Amiet, J.-L. 1970. Morphologie et dveloppement de Ia larve
de Leptodactylodonventrimamwratus (Boulenger)(Amphibien
Anoure).Ann. Fac. Sci. Cameroun 1970:53-71.
. 1971. Le ttard d'rlstylosternus c m ~ a t u sBoulenger
(Amphibien Anoure).Ann. Fac. Sci. Cameroun 1971:85-98.
1974a. La ponte de Ia larve d'Opistbotbylux immaculatus
Boulenger (Amphibien Anoure). Ann. Fac. Sci. Camwmn
1974:121-130.
. 1974b. Le ttard d'Hyperolius obstetricansAhl (Amphibien Anoure). BuU. Inst. France Aj-zca Noire 36:973-981.
. 1976. Les formes larvaires d'Hypwolius hrebsi Mertens
et H. koehkri Mertens (Amphibien Anoures). Ann. Fac. Sci.
Cameroun 1976:159-169.
. 1979. Description de I'adulte et de Ia larve d'Hypemlzus
bopeeti n. sp. (AmphibiaAnura, Hyperoliidae).Ann. Fac. Sci.
Cameroun 1979:113-124.
Anderson, J. D. 1972. Phototactic behavior of larvae and adults
of two subspecies of Ambystoma mamodactylum. Herpetologica 28:222-226.
Andrn, C., L. Hendrickson, M. Olsson, and G. Nilson. 1988.
Effects of pH and aluminum on embryonic and early larval
stages of Swedish brown frogs Rana arvalis, R. temporaria,
and R. dalmatina.Holarctic Ecol. 11:127-1 35.
Andrn, C., and G. Nilson. 1985. Breeding pool characteristics
and reproduction in an island population of nattejack toads,
Bufo calamita Laur., at the Swedish west coast. AmphibiaReptilia 6: 137-142.
Andres, G. 1963. Eine experimenteiie analyse der Entwicklung
der larvalen Pigmenunuster von fiinf Anurenarten. Zoo&iEa 40: 1-112.
Andres, K. H. 1970. Anatomy and ultrastructure of the olfactory bulb in fish, Amphibia, reptiles, birds, and mammals.
pp. 177-194. In T&e and smell in vevtebrates. CIBA Found.
Symp., edited by G. E. W. Wolstenholme and J. Knight. London: J. and A. Churchiil.
Andrews, R. M., and B. R. Rose. 1994. Evolution ofviviparity:
Constraints on egg retention. Physwl. 2001.
67: 1006-1024.
Angel, F. 1946. Faune de France. Rtptiks et amphibiens. Paris:
Paul LeChevaiier.
Anholt, B., S. Negovetic, and C. Som. 1998a. Methods for anaesthetizing and marking larval anurans. Herpetol. Rev.
29:153-154.
- -
- -
351
352
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
ische, cytochemische und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen am Nephron (mit Bercksichtigung der Mitochondrien).Zeit. Zellfmsch.Mikros. Anat. 42:386-422.
Barker, J., and G. C. Grigg. 1977.AfiIdgude toAush.alian@gs.
Adelaide, Australia: Rigby Ltd.
Biirlcher, F., R. J. Mackay, and G. B. Wiggins. 1978. Detritus
processing in a temporaty vernal pool in southern Ontario.
Arch. Hydrobwl. 81:269-295.
Barnes, M. D., and K. E. Mey. 1983. Maturation and recycling
of trigeminal motoneurons in anuran lamae. J. Comp. Nearol. 218:406414.
Barreto, L., and G. Moriera. 1996. Seasonal variation in age
structure and spatial distnbution of a savanna larvai anuran
assemblage in central Brazi1.J. Helpetol. 30:87-92.
Barrington, E. J. W. 1942. Gastric digestion in the lower vertebrates. Biol. Rev.17:1-27.
. 1946. The delayed development of the stomach in the
frog (&nu temporaria) and the toad (Bu. bufo). Proc. Zool.
Soc.Londan 116:l-21.
. 1957. The alimentary canal and digestion. In Thephysiology $f"hes. Vol. 2, Metabolim. Edited by M. Brown. New
York: Academic Press.
Barrio, A. 1953. Sistemtica, morfologia y reproduccin de
Physahmus henselii (Peters) y Pseudopaludicola falczipes
(Hensel)(Anura, Leptodactylidae).Physzs 20: 379-389.
. 1976. Obsemaciones etoecologicas sobre Hylorina sylvatica Beii (Anura, Leptodactylidae).PhysZr 27: 153-157.
Bany, T. H. 1956. The ontogenesis of the sound-conducting
apparatus of Bafo angusticeps Smith. Molphol.Jahrb. 97:477544.
Barandun, J., and H.-U. Reyer. 1997. Reproductive ecology of
Bombina variegata: Development of eggs and larvae. J. Herpetol. 31:107-110.
Bardsley, L., and T. J. C. Beebee. 1998. Interspecific competition between Bufo larvae under conditions of cornrnunity
transition. Eco& ,79:1751.
Bqoglu, M., and N. Ozeti. 1973. Turkiye amphibileri. Ege Univ m i t e Fen Fakiiltesi KZtaplar Seriri (50):1-155.
Bateson, P. 1983. Optimal outbreeding. pp. 257-277. In Mate
choice, edited by P. Bateson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Battaglini, P., and P. Boni. 1967. Indigenous microbial flora and
the large intestine in tadpoles. Experientia 23:950-951.
Batten, T. F. C., and P. M. Ingleton. 1987. The hypothalamus
and pituitaty gland. pp. 285-412. In Fundamentais of wmparative vertebrate endocrinology, edited by I. Chester-Jones,
P. M. Ingleton, and J. G. Phillips. New York: Plenum.
Bavay, A. 1873. Notes sur I'Hylodes martinicensis Tschudi et ses
metamorphosis. Rev.Sci. Nat. 1:281-290.
Beach, D. H., and M. Jacobson. 1979a. Patterns of ceii proliferation in the retina of the clawed frog during deve1opment.J
Comp. Neurol. 183:603-614.
. 1979b. Influentes of thyroxine on ceii proliferation in
the retina of the clawed frog at different ages. J. Comp. Nearol. 183:615-624.
Beachy, C. K. 1995. Eficts of larvai growth history on metamorphosis in a stream-dwelling salamander (Desmgnathw
ochmphaeus).J. Helpetol. 29: 375-382.
Bearns, H. W, and R. G. Kessel. 1974. The problern of germ
ceii determinants.Intl. Rev.Cytol. 39:413479.
Beaumont, A. 1970. Apparition des ceiiules insulaires a dans le
pancras lamaire d'un Amphibien Anoure: Discoglosaspictus
Otth. C. R. Hebd. SeancesAcad. Sci. Paris 271D:1104-1106.
Beaumont, A., and J. Deu&. 1958. La kratinisation des dents
353
354
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
Bhunein, A. R., R. K. O'Hara, and D. H. Olson. 1984. Kin
pdrence behaviour is present after metamorphosis in Rana
cauudue fiogs. Anim. Behav. 32:445450.
Bhmein, A. R., and B. Waldman. 1992. Kin recognition in anuran amphibian larvae. Anim. Behav. 44:207-221.
Btiunein, A. R, and S. C. Waiis. 1995. Aggregation behaviour
and kin recognition. pp. 568-602. InAmphibian bwlogy, Vol.
2. Chipping Norton, New South Wales: Surrey Beatty.
BLuistein, A. R., T. Yoshikawa, K. Asoh, and S. C. Waiis. 1993.
Ontogenetic shifts in tadpole kin recognition- loss of signal
and perception.Anim. Behav. 46: 525-538.
Bbmein, L., and B. P. Kotler. 1993. Oviposition habitat selection by the mosquito, Culiseta longiareolata: Effects of conspadcs, food, and green toad tadpoles. Ecol. Entowwl.
18:104-108.
BLauuein, L., and J. Margaiit. 1994. Mosquito larvae (Culiseta
m m i u t a ) prey upon and compete with toad tadpoles
:B@ piridis).J. Anim. Eml. 63: 84 1-850.
. 1995. Spatial distributions of Culiseta longiareoiuta
iculicidae: Diptera) and BufO viridis (Amphibia: Bufoni&e) arnong and within desert pools. J. Arid EnPimn.
2!2:199-211.
. 1996. Priority effects in temporacy pools: Nature and
ourcome of mosquito larva-toad tadpole interactions depend on order of entrance. J. Anim. Ewl. 65: 77-84.
E l u b e y , S. 1958. Cannibaiism in Rana ylvatica tadpoles a weii
h a n phenomenon. HmpetologKa 14:34.
W E. J. 1905. The life histocy o f X e m p s lamis Daud. Trans.
h.
Edinburgh 41 :789-821.
I E g k -1R 1976. The muscular control of vertebrate swimming movements. Bwl. Ra7 52:181-218.
. 1978. Golgi-staining of "primary " and "secondacy "
motoneurons in the developing spinal cord of an amphibian.
J. Cmnp.Neurol. 180:679-690.
&amas-Schiosser, R. M. A. 1975. Observations on the iarvd
k d o p m e n t of some Malagasy frogs, with notes on their
c a h g v and biology (Anura: Dyscophinae, Scaphiophrynime and Cophyiiiae).BeaufOrtia 24:7-26.
. 1979a. Biosystematics of the Malagasy fiogs. I. Mand h a e (Ranidae).Beaufaia (352):1-76.
. 1979b. Biosystematics of the Malagasy frogs 11. The
-=US
Boaphic (Rhacophoridae). Bijd. tot de Dzirkunde
49:261-3 12.
. 1981. On endemic Malagasy frogs (Ranidae, Rhaco$midae and Hyperoliidae). Monit. Zool. Italiano (N.S.)
15:217-224.
1 9 8 2 . Observations on the Malagasy frog genus Heterim k Laurent, 1944 (Hyperoliidae).Beaufovria 32: 1-11.
Ehmmm-Schiosser, R. M. A., and C. P. Blanc. 1991. Amphib3aa.Farrm- de Madqasuw 75: 1-379, 12 plates.
lbmmers-Schlosser, R. M. A., and L. H. M. Blomrners. 1984.
Tbc amphibians. pp. 89-104. In ICIy envimnmentsWwas~ pedited
:
by A. Jolly, P. Oberle and R. Aibinac. New York:
Rrpmon.
E b i n . Ai. S. 1992a. Comparing bivariate reaction norms
m m q three species: Time and size at metamorphosis
n three species of Hyiu (Anura: Hylidae). Oecologia
90-2-293.
. 1992b. Genetic correlations among morphometric
and cates of growth and differentiation in the green
aac h g , H+ cinerea. Evolution 46735-744.
104J. E. V 1882. Uber den Conus arteriosus und die ArterPcnbogen der Amphibien. Morphol.Jahrb. 7:488-572.
kmxight-Horowitz, S. S., and A. M. Simmons. 1997. Tran-
w-
355
356
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
Brodie, E. D., Jr., and D. R. Formanowicz, Jr. 1983. Prey size
preference of predators: Differential vulnerability of larvai
anurans. Herpetologia 39:67-75.
. 1987. Antipredator mechanisms of larvai anurans: Protection of palatable individuais. Herpetologica 43 :369-3 73.
Brodie, E. D., Jc, and E. D. Brodie, 111. 1978. The development of noxiousness of Bujb americanus tadpoles to aquatic
insect predators. Herpetolo@a 34:302-306.
Bronmark, C., and P. Edenharnm. 1994. Does the presence of
fish d e c t the distribution of treefrogs (Hyh arborea). Consem. Bwl. 8:841-845.
Bronmark, C., S. D. Rundle, and A. Erlandsson. 1991. Interactions between freshwater snails and tadpoles: Competition
and facilitation. Oecologia 87: 8-18.
Brook, A. J. 1980. The breeding seasons of frogs in Victoria
and Tasmania. VictorianNat. 97: 6-1 1.
Browder, L. W., C. A. Erickson, and W. R. Jeffrey. 1991. Develc~pmentalBwlogy. 3d ed. New York: W. B. Saunders.
Brown, C. A., R. J. Wassersug, and T. Naitoh. 1992. Metamorphic changes in the vagai stimulation of the aiimentary tract
in the green frog, Rana clamitans (Ranidae). Acta Anat.
145:340-344.
Brown, D., A. Grosso, and R. C. De Sousa. 1981. The amphibian epidermis: Distribution of mitochondria-rich ceiis and
the effect of oxytocin.J Cell Sci. 52: 197-213.
Brown, D. R., A. W. Everett, and M. R. Bemett. 1989. Compartrnental and topographicai distributions of axons in
nerves to the amphibian (Bujb marinus) gluteus muscle. J.
Comp.Neurol. 284:231-241.
Brown, H. A. 1967. Embryonic temperature adaptations and
genetic compatibility in two ailopatric populations of the
spadefoot toad, Scapbwpus hammondi. Evolutwn 2 1:742761.
. 1969. The heat resistance of some anuran tadpoles
(Hylidae and Pelobatidae). Copeia 1969:138-147.
. 1990a. Temperature, thyroxine, and induced metamorphosis in tadpoles of the primitive fiog,Ascaphus. Gen. Comp.
Endocviml. 79: 136-146.
. 1990b. Morphologicai variation and age-class deterrnination in ovenvintering tadpoles of the taiied frog, kcaphus
truei.J. Zool. 220:171-184.
Brown, L. E., and R. R. Rosati. 1997. Effects of three different
diets on survival and growth of larvae of the African clawed
frog Xenopus W.Prgl: Fish-Cult. 59:54-58.
Brown, R. M., and D. H. Taylor. 1995. Compensatory escape
mode trade-offs between swimming performance and maneuvering behavior through larvai ontogeny of the wood
frog, Rana sylvatica. Copeia 1995:1-7.
Brown, S. C., E. A. Horgan, L. M. Savage, and P. S. Brown.
1986. Changes in body water and plasma constituents during buirog development: Effects of temperature and horm0nes.J. Exp. Zool. 237:25-33.
Brown, T. E., A. W. Morley, N. T. Sanderson, and R. D. Tait.
1983. Report of a large fishkiii resulting from natural acid
water conditions in Austraiia.J. Fish Bwl. 22: 335-350.
Brown, W. C., and A. C. Alcala. 1983. Modes of reproduction
of Philippine anurans. pp. 416428. In Advances zn herpetology and evolutiona~biolo~y,edited by G. G. Whittow. Cambridge, MA: Mus. Comp. Zool.
Broyles, R. H. 1981. Changes in the blood during amphibian
metamorphosis. pp. 461490. In Metamorphosis: A problem
in developmental bwlogy. 2d ed., edited by G. G. Whittow.
New York: Plenum.
357
358
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
359
360
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
361
vai Rana areolata (Anura: Ranidae) by two species of backCooper, E. L., and R. K. Wright. 1976. The anuran amphibian
swirnmer (Insecta: Hemiptera: Notonectidae). Herpeto[ogicu
spleen. An evolutionary model for terrestrial vertebrates. pp.
42: 171-174.
47-60. In Immum-aspem ofthespleen, edited by J. R. Battisto
and J. W. Streilein. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Hoiiand Crossland, M. R 1997. Impact of eggs, hatchlings, and tadBiomedical Press.
poles of the introduced cane toad Bu. marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) on native aquatic fama in northern Queensland,
Cooper, K. W. 1936. Demonstration of a hatching secretion in
Rana p t p s Schreber. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unzted States of
Australia. Dissertation, James Cook University, Townsville,
22:433-434.
Austraiia.
Cooper, R S. 1943. An experimental study of the development Crossland, M. R.,, and R. A. Alford. 1998. Evaluation of the
of the larval oifactory organ of Ranapipiens Schreber.J. Exp.
toxicity of eggs, hatchlings, and tadpoles of the introduced
toad B u . marinus (Anura: Bufonidae) to native Australian
Zool. 93:415452.
Copenhaver, W. M. 1955. Heart, blood vessels, blood, and enaquatic predators.AustralianJ Ewl. 23: 129-137.
todermal derivatives. pp. 440461. In Analyzis of helopmnt, Crowder, W. C., M. Nie, and G. R. Ultsch. 1998. Oxygen upedited by B. H. Willier, P. A. Weiss, and V. Hamburger. Philtake in buiifrog tadpoles (Rana catesbeiana). J. Exp. Zml.
adelphia: W. B. Saunders.
280:121-134.
Corkran, C. C., and C. Thoms. 1996. Amphibians of Orgon, C m p , M . L. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. H&., Univ. Kansas
nkbington and British Columbia. Edmonton: Lane Pine
(61):l-68.
Press.
. 1981. Energy accumulation and anlphibian metamorCorless, J. M., and R. D. Fetter. 1987. Structural features of the
terminal loop region of frog retinal rod outer segment disk
phosis. Oecobia 49: 167-169.
. 1983. Oppomuiistic cannibalism by amphibian larvae
membranes: 111. Implications of the terminal loop complex
for disk morphogenesis, membrane fusion, and celi surface
in temporary aquatic environments. Amrican Nat. 121:
28 1-287.
interactions.J Comp. Neurol. 257:24-38.
. 1984. Ontogenetic changes in vulnerability to preCorless, J. M., R. D. Fetter, and M. J. Costeiio. 1987a. Structurai features of the terminal loop region of frog retinal rod
dation in tadpoles of Hyla pseudqpuma. Herpetokgica
outer segrnent disk membranes: I. Organization of lipid
40:265-271.
components.J. Comp.Neurol. 257: 1-8.
. 1986. Cannibalism by younger tadpoles: Another hazard of metamorphosis. Copeia 1986:1007-1009.
Coriess, J. M., R D. Fetter, O. B. Zampighi, M. J. Costeiio, and
D. L. Wd-Buford. 1987%. Structural features of the termi. 1989a. Effect of habitat drying on developmental time
and sue at metamorphosis in Hyla pseuapuma. Copeia
nal loop region of frog retinal rod outer segment disk membrana: 11. Organization of the terminal loop complex. J.
1989:794-797.
Gmp.Neurol. 257:9-23.
. 1989b. Life-history consequences of feeding versus
nonfeeding in a facultatively nonfeeding toad larva. OewComeii, T. J., K. A. Berven, and G. J. Gamboa. 1989. Kin recopition by tadpoles and froglets of the wood frog Rana
logia 78:486-489.
+aticu.
Oecokgia 78: 3 12-3 16.
. 1990. Possible enhancement of growth in tadpoles
through cannibalism. Copeia 1990:560-564.
Gmtm-right, S. A. 1988. Intragurld predation and competition:
-inanalysis of net growth shifis in larval anuran prey. Cana. 1991. Choice of oviposition site and egg load assessdianJ. Zool. 66: 1813-1821.
ment by a treefrog. Herpetologica 47:308-315.
. 1992. Cannabilism in amphibians. pp. 256-276. In
Com\-right, S. A., and C. E. Nelson. 1990. An examination of
rnultiple factors aff'ecting community structure in an aquatic
Cannibalkm. Ewlogy and evolutirm amng diverse taxa, edited
by M . A. Elgar and B. J. Crapi. Oxford: Oxford University
amphibian cornmunity. Oeco[oga 83: 123-131.
Cor\1ja, N., and P. d'Ascanio. 1981. Spinal projections from the
Press.
mesencephalon in the toad. Brain Behav. Evol. 19:205-2 13. C m p , M. L., and M. Vaira. 1991.Vulnerability of Pkwodema
Com. H. H. 1967. Avoidance of anoxic water by tadpoles of
borelli tadpoles to an avim predator: Effea of body size and
Rama temporaria. Hydrobwlogia 30:374-384.
density. Herpetologica 47:3 16-32 1.
Costa. H. H., and S. Balasubramanian. 1965. The food of the Cuiien, M. J., and H. D. Webster. 1979. Remodelling of optic
nerve myelin sheaths an axons during metamorphosis in
ndpola of Rhmophorus mctger cmtctger (Blyth). CeylonJ. Sci.
5:105-109, 1plate.
Xenupus luatis. J. Comp. Neurol. 184:353-362.
Coa-den, R R., B. M. Gebhardt, and E. P. Volpe. 1968. The Culley, D. D., Jr. 1991. Bulifrog culture. pp. 185-205. In Pmhistophysiology of antibody-forming sites in the marine
d d n in aquatic anzmals, edited by C. E. Nask Amsterdam:
mad. Zeit. Zellfonch.Mikros. Anat. 85 :196-205.
Elsevier Sci. Publ.
Coa-ies, R. B., and C. M. Bogert. 1944. A preliminary study of Cuiiey, D. D., Jr., S. P. Meyers, and A. J. Doucette, Jr. 1977. A
high density rearing system for larval anurans. Lab Anim.
the thermal requirements of desert reptiles. Bull. Amrican
,Ih.Nat. Hia. 83:261-296.
6:34-41.
Cor. T. C., and R H . Alvarado. 1979. Electrical and transport Cuiiey, D. D., Jr., and P. K. Sotairidis. 1983. Progress andprobhms associated with bullfiog tadpoh dkts and nutrctrctwn.
3d Anb c t e r i s t i c s of skin of larval Rana catesbeiana. American].
P+1.237:1274-1279.
nual Dr. Schoii Conferente on the hTutritionof Captive Wdd
. 1983. Nystatin studies of skin of larval Rana catesbeiAnimais, Chicago.
una.A&an
J. Physwl. 244R: 58-65.
Cummins, C. P. 1989. Interaction between the effects of pH
Cta=dmv,L. I., R. N. Rausch, L. P. W o h u t h , and E. J. Bauer.
and density on growth and development in Rana temporaria
tadpoles. Funct. Ecol. 3:45-52.
1992. Seasonal rhythms of development and temperature selettion in larval bulifrogs, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. Physwl. Cupp, P. V., Jr. 1980. Thermal tolerante of five salientian amZad.65:346-359.
phibians during development and metamorphosis. HerpetoCmma J. T., and J. Travis. 1986. Sue-limited predation on larb i c a 36:234-244.
362
LITERATURE CITED
Curtis, S. K., R. R. Cowden, and J. W. Nagel. 1979. Ultrastructure of the bone rnarrow of the saiamander Pfethodunglutimsus (Caudata: Plethodontidae).J Morphol. 159:151-160.
Cusirnano-Carollo,T. 1963. Investigation on the ability of the
neurai folds to induce a rnouth in the Diswglossuspictzts ernbryo. Acta Embryol. Morphol. Evp. 6: 158-168.
. 1969. Phenornena of induction by the transverse neural
fold during the forrnation of the rnouth in ~coglosuspictus.
ActaEmbryol.Evp. 1969:97-110.
. 1972. The mechanisrn of the forrnation of the larvai
rnouth in DZrco&ssus pictus. Acta Embryol. Evp. 1972:289332.
Cusimano-Carollo, T., A. Fagone, and G. Reverbei. 1962. On
the origin of the larvai rnouth in the anurans. Acta Embryol.
Morphol. Evp. 5:82-103.
Czechura, G. V, G. J. Ingram, and D. S. Liern. 1987. The genus
Nyctimystes (Anura: Hylidae) in Australia. Rec. Australian
Mus. 39:333-338.
Cdowska, R. 1972. The fine structure of the "germinai cytoplasrn" in the egg of Xenupus W.WiUielmRodArch. Entwicklungsmech. Org. 169:335-344.
Da Cruz, C. A. G. 1980. Descrio de uma nova espcie de
Phyllomedusinae do Estado do Esprito Santo, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Rev. Brasil. Bwl. 40:683-687.
. 1982. Descrio de grupos espcies de Phyllornedusinae Brasileiras com base em caracteres larvrios (Amphibia,
Anura, Hylidae). Arq. Unia. Fed. Rural Riu de Janeiro
5: 147-171.
Da Cruz, C. A. G., and 0 . L. Peixoto. 1978. Notas sobre o girino de Darypops schirchi Miranda-Ribeiro (Amphibia,Anura,
Microhylidae).Rev.Brasil. Bwl. 38:297-299.
. 1980a. Notas sobre o girino de Sphaenmhynchus orophilus (Lutz & Lutz, 1938)(Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Rev.
Brasil. Bwl. 40:383-386.
. 1980b. Observaes sobre a larva de Procmatophrys appendicuiuta (Giinther 1873)(Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae). Rev.Brasil. Bwl. 40:491493.
Dainton, B. H. 1988. Cold tolerance and thyroid activity in developing tadpoles of Xevwpus iuemk.J Herpetol. 22: 301-306.
. 1991. Heat tolerance and thyroid activity in developing
tadpoles and juvenile adults of Xevwpus hmis (Daudin).J
Therm.Bzol. 16:273-276.
Daniel, J. E, and A. B. Burch. 1933. A rotary disc for the observation of objects in proiie. Unia. Calqomia Publ. 2001.
39:201-204.
Danos, S. O., J. S. Maki, and C. C. Rernsen. 1983. Stratiication
of microorganisrns and nutrients in the surface microlayer of
srnali freshwater ponds. Hydrobwloga 98: 193-202.
Dameli, R. M., Jr. 1949. The aortic arches and associated arteries of caudate Amphibia. Copeia 1949:18-3 1.
Das, I. 1994. The internai oral rnorphology of some anuran larvae fiorn south India: A scanning electron rnicroscopic
study. Amphibia-Reptilia 15:249-256.
Dash, M. C., and A. K. Hota. 1980. Density effects on the survivai, growth rate, and metamorphosis of Rana tgrina tadpoles. Ewlogy 61:1025-1028.
Dash, M. C., and B. K. Mahapatro. 1990. Effect of food quality
and quantity on growth and rnetamorphosis of BuJOstomaticw 1arvae.J Ecobwl. 2:67-76.
Dash, M. C., and P. K. Mishra. 1989. Energy cost of rnetamorphosis in a tropical tree frog Polypdutes muiutus (Gray).J
Ecobwl. 1:131-136.
Daua, M., R. Calvert, D. Mnard, J. S. Hugon, and J.
Hourdry. 1982. Developrnent of peroxisornes in amphibians. 11. Cytochemicai and biochernicai studies on the liver,
kidney and pancreas.J Evp. 2001.223 :57-65.
. 1983. Developrnent of peroxisornes in amphibians. 111.
Study on liver, kidney, and intestine during thyroxineinduced rnetamorphosis.J Evp. 2001.227:413422.
Daua M., and J. Hourdry. 1983. Modi6cations du rgime alirnentaire chez les amphibiens anoures en rntamorphose.
SOC.2001.
Paris 108:409415.
Daua M., J. Hourdry, J. S. Hugon, and D. Mnard. 1980. Amphibian intestinal b m h border enzyrnes during thyroxineinduced rnetamorphosis. A biochemicai and cytochemicai
study. Histochemisty 70:3 3 4 2 .
Davenport, C. B., and W. E. Castle. 1895. Studies on rnorphogenesis. 111. On the acclirnation of organisrns to high ternperature. Arch. EntwiEklungsmech. Mech. Org. 2:227-249.
Davidson, E . H. 1986. Gene activiq in early dme&ment. 3d ed.
New York: Academic Press.
Davies, M. 1989. Ontogeny of bone and the role of heterochrony in the rnyobatrachine genera Upmoieza, Crinia, and
Pseudophryne (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Myobatrachinae).J.
Mmphol. 200:269-300.
. 1991. Descriptions of the tadpoles of some Australian
limnodynastine leptodactylid frogs. Trans. Roy. Soc. South
Australia 115:67-76.
Davies, M., and S. J. Richards. 1990. Developrnental biology
of the Australian hylid frog Nyccimystesdayi (Giinther).Trans.
Roy. Soc. South Australia 114:207-2 11.
Davis, M. R., and M. Constantine-Paton. 1983. Hyperplasia in
the spinai sensory system of the fiog. I. Plasticity in the rnost
caudal dorsai root gangh0n.J Comp.Neurol. 221 :444-452.
Davis, W. M., and R. F. Nunnernacher. 1974. Nerve fibers in
the syrnpathetic tnink of Ranapip'ens: A quantitative electron microscope study. Anat. Rec. 179:331-342.
Dawson, J. T. 1982. Kin recognition and schooling in the
American toad (BuJOa&anus).
Dissertation, State University of New York, Albany.
De Albuja, C. M., M. Campos, and E. M. De1 Pino. 1983. Role
of progesterone in oocyte rnaturation in the egg-brooding
hylid frog Gastrotheca Gbambae (Fowler). J Evp. 2001.
227:271-276.
De Bavay, J. M. 1993. The developrnental stages of the sphagnum fiog, Kyarranus sphagnicolous Moore (Anura, Myobatrachidae).AustralianJ 2001.4 1:151-20 1.
De Beer. G. R. 1926. Studies on the vertebrate head. 11. The
orbit&ternporal region of the skull. Qmrt. J Micros. SSn.
70:263-370.
. 1951. Embryos and ancestm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
. 1985. The dmeiupment of the vertebrate kull. Reprint,
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
DeBenedictis, P. A. 1974. Interspecific cornpetition between
tadpoles of Ranapipiens and Rama sylaatica: An experimental
field study. Ecol. Monogr 44: 129-15 1.
Debski, E. A., and M. Constantine-Paton. 1990. Evoked preand postsynaptic activity in the optic tectum of the cannulated tadpo1e.J Comp. Physwl. 167A:377-390.
Decker, R. S. 1976. Influente of thyroid horrnones on neuronai
death and dzerentiation in larvai Ramapipiens. Deve&. Bwl.
49:lOl-118.
Degani, G. 1982. Amphibian tadpole interaction in a winter
pond. Hydrobwlogia 96:3-7.
. 1986. Growth and behaviour of six species of amphibian larvae in a winter pond in Israel. Hydrobwlogia 1405-10.
LITERATURE CITED
Degani, G., and E. Nevo. 1986. Osmotic stress and osmoregulation of tadpoles and juveniles of Pelobates yriacus. Comp.
Bwchem. Physwl. 83A:365-370.
DeHaan, R. L. 1965. Morphogenesis of the vertebrate heart.
pp. 377400. In Orgamgenesis, edited by R. L. DeHaan and
H . Urspning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
De Jongh, H. J. 1967. Relative growth of the eye in larval and
metamorphosingRana tempuraria. Growth 3 1:93-103.
. 1968. Functional morphology of the jaw apparatus of
larval and metamorphosing Rana temporaria L. Netherlands
J. 2001.18:l-103.
De Ia Riva, I. 1995. A new reproductive mode for the genus
A d e m m a (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae): Taxonomic
implications for certain Boiivian and Paraguayan popuiations. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 30: 15-29.
Delbos, M. 1975. Observations sur I'ultrastructure de I'uretre
primaire et du blastme msonphrtique avant sa differenciation chez Rana hlmatina (Amphibien Anoure). C. R.
Hebd. SeancesAcad.Sci. Paris 280D:893-895.
Delbos, M., J.-D. Gipouloux, and R. Cambar. 1971. Observations sur I'infrastructure des diffrents types cellulaires constituant la gonade larvaire chez Ia grenouiile agile Rana dalmatina Bon. (Amphibien Anoure). C. R. Hebd. SeancesAcad.
Sci. Paris 272D:2372-2374.
Delbos, M., J.-D. Gipouioux, and S. Guennoun. 1981. Caractres uitrastructuraux et cytochimiques des cellules germinales primordiales des amphibiens anoures. Arch. Anat.
Mimos. Morphol. Exp. 70: 117-128.
. 1982. Intraendodermal and intramesenteric migration
of anuran amphibian germ cells: Transmission and scanning
electron microscopy.J. Morphol. 171:355-360.
Delbos, M., J. Lestage, and J.-D. Gipouloux. 1980. Localisation
cytochimique d'une importante activit adnylate cyclasique
dans le cordo-msodermeembryonnaire des amphibiens anoures. Arch. Anat. Micms. Morphol. Exp. 69:47-56.
Delbos, M., K. R. Miller, and J.-D. Gipouiow. 1984. Freezefracture of Ranapipiens gonad anlage: Study of primordial
germ cells and other cellular types. Arch. Anat. Mimos. Morphol. Exp. 73:57-67.
D e h o , G. 1977. Il differenziamento deiie ghiandole granulose
cutanee in larve di Bombina variegata pachypus (Bonaparte)(Anfibio, Anuro, Discoglosside). Ricerca al microscopio ottico e al microscopio elettrinico.Arch. Italiano Anat.
Embriol. 82:337-363.
D e h o , G., R. Brizzi, and C. Cailoni. 1982. Development of
cutaneous glands in Salamandrina terdigitata (Lacpde,
1788)(Amphibia: Urodela); findings by light and electron
microscopy. Zeit. Mikms. Anat. Forseb. 96:948-971.
Deiidow, B. C. 1989. Reevaluation of the effects of growth hormone and prolactin on anuran tadpole growth and development. J Exp. Zool. 249:279-283.
De1 Pino, E. M. 1975. Adaptaciones reproductivas para Ia vida
terestre de1 sapo marsupial Gmotheca riobambae (Fowler),
Anura, Hylidae. Reu. Uniu. CatolicaEcuadm 3: 119-140.
. 1980a. Morphology of the pouch and incubatory integurnent in marsupial fkogs (Hyiidae). Copea 1980:10-17.
. 1980b. E1 mantenimiento y aspectos de1 comportaniento encautiverio de1 sapo marsupial Gmotheca riobambae
(Hyiidae).Rev. Univ. Catolica Ecuadm 8 : 4 1 4 9 .
. 1989a. Marsupial frogs. Sci.American May:llO-118.
. 1989b. Modifications of oogenesis and development in
marsupial frogs. Devebment 107:169-187.
. 1996. The expression of Brachyury (T) during gastrula-
363
364
LITERATURE CITED
. 1989. Larval diets of two anuran species, Peiodytespunctatus and Bufo bufo, in SW Spain. Amphibia-Reptilia 10:7175.
Di Bernardino, M. A. 1961. Investigations of the gerrn-plasrn
in relation to nuclear transplantation. J Embyol. Exp. Movphol. 9:507-513.
DiBona, D. R., M. M. Civan, and A. Led. 1969. The anatornic
site of the transepithelial perrneability barriers of toad bladder./: CeU Bwl. 40: 1-7.
Dickman, M. 1968. The effea of grzing by tadpoles on the
structure of a periphyton cornmunity. Ecology 49:11881190.
Diener, E., and G. J. V. Nossal. 1966. Phylogenetic studies on
the immune response. I. Localization of antigens and irnmune response in the toad, Bufo mavinus. Immumlo~y
10:535-542.
Diesel, R., G. Baurle, and E Vogel. 1995. Cave breeding and
froglet transport: A nove1 pattern of anuran brood care
in the Jamaican frog, Eleutherodac~luscundalli. Copeia
1995:354-360.
Dietz, T. H., and R. H. Aivarado. 1974. Na and C1 transport
across gi chamber epitheliurn of Rana catesbeiana tadpoles.
AmeriuGnJ Physwl. 226: 764-770.
Di Grande, F. 1968. Sviluppo postmetamorfico deiie gonadi e
degli organi di Bidder in esernplari di Bufo bufo precocernente panirradiati con raggi X. Rend. Accad. Naz. Lincei. Ser.
8,45:437-442.
. 1987. Aspetti deiia rnorfogenesi deiie gonadi e degli
organi di Bidder in giovani esernplari di Bufo bufo sperimentalrnente privati di gran parte deiie loro cellule germinaii. I.
Stadi prernetamorfici. Arch. Italiano Anat. Embriol. 92: 159177.
Di Grande, F., and 0 . Marescalchi. 1987. Aspetti deiia modogenesi deiie gonadi e degli organi di Bidder in giovani esernplari di Bufo bufo sperimentalmentepnvati di gran parte deiie
loro cellule germinali. 11. Stadi prernetamorfici postmetarnorfici. Arch. Italiano Anat. Embriol. 92: 179-208.
Dionne, J.-C. 1969. Tadpole holes: A true biogenic sedirnentary
structure.J Sedivnent. Pehol. 39:358-360.
DiStefano, R. J., M. J. Roell, B. A. Wagner, and J. J. Descoske.
1994. Relative perforrnances of four preservatives on fish
and crayfish. Trans.A v n e k n Fhh. Soc. 1232317-823.
Ditrich, H., and A. Lametschwandtner. 1992. Glorneruiar developrnent and growth of the renal blood vacular systern in
Xenopus iamis (Arnphibia, Anura, Pipidae) during rnetamorphic c1irnax.J Moqhol. 213:335-340.
Dixon, J. R, and W. R Heyer. 1968. Anuran succession in a
ternporary pond in Colima, Mexico. BuU. Southem Calqomia
Acad. Sci. 67: 129-137.
Dixon, J. R, C. Mercolii, and A. A. Yanosky. 1995. Some aspeas of the ecology of Pseudisparaduxa frorn northeastern
Argentina. Heqetol. Rev. 26: 183-184.
Dixon, J. R., and C. Rivero-Blanco. 1985. A new dendrobatid
frog (Colosrethus)frorn Venezuela with notes on its natural
history and that of related species.J Hqetol. 19:177-184.
Dixon, K. E. 1981. The origin of the primordial gerrn ceils in
the Arnphibia. NetherhndcJ Zool. 315 3 7 .
Dodd, J. M. 1950. Ciliary feeding rnechanisrns in anuran larvae.
Nature 165:283.
Dodd, M. H. I., and J. M. Dodd. 1976. The biology of rnetarnorphosis. pp. 467-599. In Physwlogy of the Amphibia. Vol.
3, edited by B. Lofts. New York: Academic Press.
Donnelly, M. A., R. O. De S, and C. Guyer. 1990a. Descnption of the tadpoles of Gastwphrynepictiventris and Nelson-
LITERATURE CITED
ophlyne aterrima (Anura, Microhylidae), with a review of
morphologicai variation in free-swimming microhylid larvae. American Mus. Navitates (2976):1-19.
Donnelly, M. A., and C. Guyer. 1994. Patterns of reproduction
and habitat use in an assemblage o neotropical hyiid frogs.
Oecologa 98:291-302.
Donnelly, M. A., C. Guyer, and R O. De S. 1990b. The tadpole of a dm-poison frog Phyllobates lugubris (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Proc. Bwl. Soc. Washington 103:427431.
Donnelly, M. A., C. Guyer, D. M. Krempels, and H. E. Braker.
1987. The tadpole of Agdychnis cakarz.r (Anura: Hyiidae).
Copeia 1987:247-250.
Donner, K. O., and T. Reuter. 1976. Visual pigments and photoreceptor function. pp. 251-277. In Frog neurobwlogy, a
handbook, edited by R. Llins and W. Precht Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
Doughty, P., and R. Shine. 1998. Reproductive energy docation and long term energy stores in a viviparous lizard (Euhmprus tympanum).Ecology 79:1073-1083.
Dowling, J. E. 1976. Physiology and morphology of the retina.
pp. 278-296. In Frog neurobwiugy, a handbook, edited by R.
Liins and W. Precht Beriin: Springer-Verlag.
Downes, H., and P. M. Courogen. 1996. Contrasting effects of
anesthetics in tadpole bioassays. J. P h a m o l . Exp.
278:284-278.
Downie, J. R. 1990a. Temporal changes in the behavior o
foam-making Leptodagylus jscus tadpoles. Herpetol. J.
1:498-500.
. 1990b. Functions o the foam in foam-nesting leptodactyiids: Antipredator effects of Physalmmus pustulosus
foam. Hqet01.J. 1:501-503.
. 1994a. Developmental arrest in Leptodagylusjscus tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae). 1: Descriptive analysis. Herpet01.J. 4:29-38.
. 1994b. Developmentai arrest in Leptodagylusfiscus tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactyiidae). 2: Does a foam-borne factor
block development?Hqeto1.J 4: 3 9 4 5 .
. 1996. A new example ofemale parentai behaviour in
Leptodactylus validus, a frog of the leptodactylid "melanonotu? species group. Herpeto1.J. 6:32-34.
Downie, J. R., and A. Weir. 1997. Developmental arrest in Leptodagy1usjscus tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae) 111: Effect
o length of arrest period on growth potentiai. Herpeto1.J.
7:85-92.17.
Dressler, G. R., and P. Grusse. 1988. Do multigene families regdate vertebrate development?Trends Genet. 4:214-219.
Drewes, R. C. 1984. A phylogenetic analysis of the Hyperoiiidae (Anura): Treefrogs of Mrica, Madagascar, and the
Seychelle Islands. Occm. Pap. CdifoorniaAcad. Sci. (139):170.
Drewes, R. C., R. Altig, and K. M. Howell. 1989. Tadpoles of
three frog species endemic to the forest o the Eastern Arc
Mountains, Tanzania. Amphibia-Reptilia 10:435-443.
Dreyer, T. F. 1915. The morphology othe tadpole of Xenopzs
laevis. Trans.Roy. Soc. South A j k a 4:241-258.
Drysdale, T. A., and R. P. Eiinson. 1993. Head ectodermal patterning and axial development in frogs. American Zool.
33:417423.
Dubois, A. 1985. Diagnose prliminaire d'un nouveau genre de
Ranoidea (Amphibien, Anoures) du sud de I'Inde. Alytes
4:113-118.
. 1987. Miscellanea taxinomica batrachologia (I).Alytes
5:7-95.
. 1992. Notes sur Ia clasification des Ranidae (Amphib-
365
366
LITERATURE CITED
. 1977. An autoradiographicanalysis of nucleic acid synthesis in the presumptive primordial germ cells of Xenopus
M s . J . Embryol. E&p. Movphol. 37:13-31.
Eakin, R. M. 1963. Ultrastructural differentiation of the oral
sucker in the treefrog, Hyh regilu. Develop. Bwl. 7: 169-179.
Eakin, R. M., and F. E. Bush. 1957. Development of the amphibian pituitary with speciai referente to the neural lobe.
Anat. Rec. 129:279-296.
Eaton, T. H. 1959. The ancestry of modern Amphibia: A review of the evidente. Univ. finsas Publ. Mus. Nat. H&.
12:157-180.
Ebbesson, S. O. E. 1970. On the organization of central visual
pathways in vertebrates. Brain Behav. Evol. 3: 178-194.
. 1976. Morphology of the spinal cord. pp. 679-706. In
Frog neurobwlogy, a handbook, edited by R. Llins and W.
Precht Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
. 1980. Comparative neurology of the telencepham. New
York: Plenum.
Ebenman, B. 1988. Competition benveen age classes andpopulation dynamics.J. Theol:Bwl. 131:389400.
Eberhard, M. L., and F. H. Brandt. 1995. The role of tadpoles
and frogs as paratenic hosts in the life cycle of Dracunculus
insigntc (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea).J. Parasitol. 81:792793.
Echeverra, D. D. 1988. Oogenesis en las hembras juveniles de
Bufo arenarum (Anura, Bufonidae). Rev. Mus. Argentina
Cienc. Nat. 'Bemardino Rivaduvia' Inst. Nac. Invest. Cienc.
Nat., Zool. 15:57-75.
. 1994 (1991). Metamorphosis en Bufo arenamm (Anura, (Bufonidae): Consideraciones acercade Ia salida de 10s
miembros anteriores de las larvas. Physis 49B: 1 4 .
. 1995. Microscopia electrnica de barrido de1 aparato
bucal y de la cavidad oral de Ia larva de Leptod&yLus ocellatus
( L i a e u s 1758)(Anura, Leptodactylidae). Alytes 12:159168.
. 1996. Microscopa electrnica de barrido de1 aparato
bucal y de Ia cavidad oral de la larva de Hyhstmigilata&ngwphila Gaiiardo, 1961 (Anura, Hylidae) con comentarios que
facilitan su identificin durante Ia metamorphosis y postmetamorphosis. Phystc 54B:1-6.
. 1997. Microanatomy of the buccal apparatus and oral
cavity of Hyh minuta Peters, 1872 larvae (Anura, Hylidae),
with data on feeding habits. Alpes 15:26-36.
Echeverra, D. D., and A. M. Filipello. 1994 (1991). Consideraciones acerca de Ia formula dentaria y de1 aparato bucal de
Ias larvas de Oduntilphrynus occihntalis (Berg, 1896)(Anura,
Leptodactylidae). Physis 49B:59-63.
Echeverra, D. D., and L. E. Fiorito de Lopez. 1981. Estadios de
lametamorfosisen Bufo arenarum (Anura).P h y 40B:
~ 15-23.
Echeverra, D. D., L. E. Fiorito de Lopez, and S. B. Montanelii.
1992. Esteromorfologia de1 aparato bucal y de Ia cavidad
oral de las larvas de Ololygonfuscmaria (Lutz 1925)(Anura,
Hylidae). &. Mus. Argentina Cienc. Nat. '%emardinoRivadavia" I&. Nac. Invest. Cienc.Nat., Zool. 16:2-13.
Echeverra, D. D., L. E. Fiorito de I ~ p e z S.
, B. Montaneili,
O. B. Vaccaro, and A. M. Filipello. 1987. Consideraciones
acerca de la formulas dentarias de Ias larvas de Bufo arenamm
Hensel (Anura: Bufonidae). C u d . Herpetol. 3:33-39.
Eddy, E. M. 1975. Germ plasm and the difFerentiation of the
germ ceil line. Intl. Rev.Cytol. 43:229-280.
Eddy, E. M., and S. Ito. 1971. Fine structural and radioautographic observations on dense perinuclear cytoplasmic material in tadpole oocytes.J. Cell Bwl. 49:90-108.
Edgeworth, F. H. 1920. On the development of the hypo-
LITERATURE CITED
branchial and laryngeal muscles in Amphibia. J. Anat.
44: 125-162.
. 1930. On the masticatory and hyoid muscles of larvae
of Xenopus l&. J.Anat. 64: 184-188.
. 1935. The cranial muscles of vefiebrates. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, M. L. O., and E. B. Pivorun. 1991. The effects of
photoperiod and different dosages of melatonin on metamorphic rate and weight gain in Xenopus W tadpoles. Gen.
Comp.Endocrinul. 8 1:28-38.
Ehmann, H., and G. Swan. 1985. Reproduction and development in the marsupial frog, Assa darlingtoni (Leptodaaylidae, Anura). pp. 279-285. In The bw&y ojAustrahian~ogs
and reptiles, edited by G. Grigg, R. Shine, and H. Ehmann.
Chipping Norton, New South Wales: Surrey Beatty.
Eichler, V. B., and R. A. Porter. 1981. Rohon-Beardcells in frog
development: A study of temporal and spatial changes in a
transient ceii population.J. Comp.Neurol. 203: 121-130.
Eiselt, J. 1942. Der Musculus opercularis und die mittlere Ohrsph'ie der anuren Amphibien. Arch. Natuvgesch. (n. sel:)
10:179-219.
Ekblom, P. 1989. Developmentally regulated conversion of
mesenchyme to epithelium. FASEBJ. 3:2141-2150.
Ekman, G. 1913. Experimentelle Untersuchungen ber die
Entwicklung der Kiemenregion (Kiemenfaden und Kiemenspatten) einiger anuren Amphibien. Morphol. Jahrb.
47:419-592.
. 1924. Experimentelle Beitrage zur Herzentwicklung
der Amphibien. Roux'Arch. 106:320-352.
. 1925. Neue experimentelle Beitrage zur frhesten Entwicklung des Amphibienherzens. Acta Soc. Sci. Fennicae,
C m m .Bwl. 1:1-36.
Eldred, W. D., T. E. Finger, and J. Nolte. 1980. Central projections of the frontal organ of Ranapipiens, as demonstrated
by the anterograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. Cell
Tiss.Res. 211:215-222.
Elepfandt, A. 1988a. Central organization of wave localization
in the clawed frog, Xenupus W .I. Involvement and bilateral organization of the rnidbrain. Brazn Behav. Evol.
31:349-357.
. 1988b. Central organization of wave localization in the
clawed frog, Xenops imis. 11. Midbrain topology for wave
directions. Brain Behav. Evol. 3 1:358-368.
Elias, H. 1937. Zur vergleichenden Histologie und Entwickiungsgeschichte der Haut der Anuren. Zeit. Mikros.
Anat. Fonch. 41:359416.
Elinson, R. E 1987a. Change in development patterns: Embryos of amphibians with large eggs. pp. 1-21. In Deveiupment as an evolutwnarypcess. MBL Lect. Bwl. Vol. 8, edited
by R. A. RaEand E. C. RafE New York: Alan R. Liss.
. 1987b. Fertilization and aqueous development of the
Puerto Rican terrestrial-breeding frog, Eletttherodugylus w qui.J. Morphol. 193:217-224.
. 1990. Direct development in frogs: Wiping the recapitulationist slate clean. Seminan Deveiup. Bwl. 1:263-270.
. 1994. Leg development in a frog without a tadpole
(Eleutherodugyluscoqui).J. Exp. Zool. 270:202-21 O.
Elinson, R. P., and E. M. De1 Pino. 1985. Cleavage and gastrulation in the egg-brooding, marsupial frog, Gastrotheca nobambae.J.Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 90:223-232.
Elinson, R. P., E. M. De1 Pino, D. S. Townsend, F. C. Cuesta,
and P. Eichhorn. 1990. A practical guide to the developmental biology of terrestrial-breeding frogs. Bwl. Bull.
179:163-177.
367
368
LITERATURE CITED
Feder, M. E., and W. W. Burggren. 1985. Cutaneous gas exchange in vertebrates: Design, patterns, control and implications. Bwl. Kev. 60:1-45.
Feder, M. E., R. J. Fuli, and J. Piiper. 1988. Eiimination kinetics
of acetylene and Preon 22 in resting and active lungless salarnanders. Respil: Physwl. 72:229-240.
Feder, M. E., A. G. Gibbs, G. A. Griflith, and J. Tsuji. 1984a.
Therrnal acclimation of rnetabolism in salamanders: Fact or
artefact?J.Therm. Bwl. 9:255-260.
Feder, M. E., and A. W. Pinder. 1988. Ventilation and its effect
on "infinite pooP' exchangers.American Zool. 28:973-983.
Feder, M. E., D. B. Seale, M. E. Boraas, R. J. Wassersug, and
A. G. Gibbs. 1984b. Funaional confias benveen feeding
and gas exchange in suspension-feeding tadpoles, Xenupus
1aevii.J. Exp. Biol. 110:91-98.
Feder, M. E., and R. J. Wassersug. 1984. Aerial versus aquatic
oxygen consumption in the larvae of the clawed frog, Xenupus l m i .J Exp. Bwl. 108:231-245.
Feinsinger, P., E. E. Spears, and R. W. Poole. 1981. A simple
measure of niche breadth. Ecologv 62:27-32.
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method.
AmeriLan Nat. 125: 1-15.
Feminella, J. W., and C. P. Hawkins. 1994. Tailed frog tadpoles
differentially alter their feeding behavior in response to nonvisual cues from four predators. J. North Amerian Benthol.
Soc. 13:310-320.
Feng, A. S., and W. Lin. 1991. DifFerential innervation patterns
of three divisions of frog auditory midbrain ( t o m semicircdaris). J. Comp. Neurol. 306:613-630.
Fermin, P. 1765. Dveloppemntpa$it du mYstrede lagr&at~n
dufameux mapaud de Surinam. Maestricht.
Fernndez, K. 1926. Sober la biologa y reproduccin de batracios argentinos (segunda parte). Bol.Acad. A'ac. Cienc. Crdoba 29:271-320, 1plate.
Fernindez, K., and M. Fernndez. 1921. Sobre la biologa y
reproduccin de algunos batracios argentinos. I. Cystignathidae. Ann. Soc. Cient.Argentina 91:97-140, 3 plates.
Ferns, M. J., and A. H. Lamb. 1987. Regulation of cell numbers in the developing neurornuscular system in Xenopus
laevii. Neurosci. Lett. Su.1. 27S:72.
Ferrari, L. 1998. Tolerance of high electrolytic and nonelectrolytic osrnolarities in Bufi arenarum prernetamorphic
tadpoles under organism density stress. Alpes 15:171175.
Figge, F. H. J. 1936. The differential reaction of the blood vessels of a branchiai arch of Amblystoma tgrinum (Colorado
axolotl) I. The reaction to adrenalin, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. Physhl. Zool. 9: 79-1 01.
Figiel, C. R., Jt, and R. D. Semlitsch. 1991. Effects of nonlethal injury and habitat cornplexity on predation in tadpole
populations. CanadianJ. Zool. 695330-834.
Filipski, G. T., and M. V; H. Wilson. 1985. Staining nerves in
whole cleared amphibians and reptiles using Sudan black B.
Cupeia 1985:500-502.
Pink, W. L. 1982. The conceptual relationship between ontogeny and phylogeny. Pabobwhgy 8:254-264.
Fiorito de Lopez, L. E., and D. D. Echeverra. 1984. Morfogenesis de 10s dientes larvales y pico corneo de Bufi
arenarum (Anura, Bufonidae). ZooIodia 13:5 73-578.
. 1989. Microanatomia e histogenesis de1 aparato bucal
en las larvas de Rufi arenarum (Anura, Bufonidae). Cuad.
He~petol.4:4-10.
Fisher, R. A. 1930. The~eneticaltheory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
LITERATURE CITED
Fishwild, T. G., R. A. Schemidt, K. M. Jankens, K. A. Berven,
G. J. Gamboa, and C. M. Richards. 1990. Sibling recognition by larval frogs (Ranapipiens,R. sylvatica and Pseudmtis
crucqer).J. Herpetol. 24:4044.
Fite, K. V, ed. 1976. The amphibian vistal system:A multidisciplinay appvmh. New York: Academic Press.
. 1985. Pretectai and accessory-opticvisual nuclei of fish,
Amphibia, and reptiles: Theme and variations. Brain Behav.
Evol. 26:71-90.
Fite, K. V., R. G. Carey, and D. Vicario. 1977. Visual neurons
in frog anterior thalamus. BrainRes. 127:283-290.
Fletcher, K., and N. B. Myant. 1959. Oxygen consurnption of
tadpoles during rnetamorphosis.J. Physiol. 145:353-368.
Flock, A. 1965. Electron microscopic and electrophysiologic
studies on the lateral line canal organ. Acta Otolayngal.
Suppl. 199:1-90.
Flock, A., and J. Wersall. 1962. A study of the orientation of
the sensory hairs of the receptor celis in the lateral line organ
of fish, with special reference to the function of the receptors.
J. CeU. Bwl. 15:19-27.
Flores-Nava, A., M. A. Olvera-Novoa, and E. Gasca-Leyva.
1994. A cornparison of the effeas of three water-circulation
regimes on the aquaculture of buiifrog (Rana catesbeiana
Shaw) tadpoles. Agumulture 128:105-1 14.
Flower, S. S. 1899. Notes on a second coliection of reptiles and
batrachians rnade in the Malay Peninsula and Siam, frorn
November 1896 to Septernber 1898, with a list of the species recorded from those countries. Proc. Zool. Soc. London
1899:885-916, plates 59-60.
Floyd, R. B. 1983. Ontogenetic change in the ternperature tolerance of larval Bufo marinus (Anura: Bufonidae). Comp.Bwchem. Physwl. 75A:267-271.
. 1984. Variation in temperature preference with stage
of development of Bufo marinus larvae.J. Herpetol. 18:153158.
. 1985. Effeas of photoperiod and starvation on the
ternperature tolerance of larvae of the giant toad, Bufo marinus. Cupeia 1985:625-631.
Ford, L. S., and D.C. Cannatelia. 1993. The major clades of
frogs. Herpetol. Momgr. (7):94-117.
Ford, T. D., and W. J. Breed. 1970. Tadpole holes forrned during desciccation of overbank pool. J. Sediment. Petrol.
40: 1044-1045.
Forehand, C. J., and P. B. Farel. 1982a. Spinai cord developrnent in anuran larvae: I. Primary and secondary neurons.
J. Comp.Neuol. 209:386-394.
. 1982b. Spinai cord developrnent in anuran larvae: 11.
Ascendiig and descending pathways. J. Comp. Neurol.
209:395-408.
Forge, l?,and R. Barbault. 1977. Ecologie de la reproduction
et due dveloppernent larvaire d'un amphibien dserticole,
Bufo pentoni Anderson, 1893, au Senegal. l h e Vie
31: 117-125.
Forman L. J., and J. J. Just. 1976. The life span of red blood
celis in the amphibian larvae, Rana catesbeiana. Deve&. Biol.
50: 537-540.
Forrnanowicz, D. R., Jr. 1986. Anuran tadpoleJaquatic insect
predator-prey interactions: Tadpole size and predator capture success. Herpetologica 42: 367-373.
Forrnanowicz, D. R., Jc, andM. S. Bobka. 1989. Predation risk
and microhabitat preference: An experimental study of the
behaviorai responses of prey and predator. American Midl.
Nat. 121:379-386.
Forrnanowicz, D. R., Jr., and E. D. Brodie, Jr. 1982. Relative
369
- -
370
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
Gdardo, J. M. 1961. Observaciones biolgicas sobre Hylaraddiana Fitz., de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Cienc. Invest.
17:63-69.
Gdien, L., and C. Houiiion. 1951. Table cronologique de dveloppement chez Discoglossus pictus. Bull. Bwl. FranceBebique 85:373-375.
Gans, C., and G. De Gueldre. 1992. Striated muscle: Physiology and functional morphology. pp. 277-313. In Enuirunmentalphyswlogy ofthe amphibians, edited by M. E. Feder and
W. W. Burggren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gardener, L. W, and A. M. Peadon. 1955. The role of the thyroid gland in direa development in the anuran, Ekutherodmtylus martinicensis. Gmwth 19:263-286.
Garstang, W 1922. The theory of recapitulation: A critical restatement of the biogenetic law. J. Linnean Soc. Zool. 35 :8 1101.
Garth, S., ed. 1961. Ooid'sMetammphoses, injfieen books. Translated by John Dryden et ai. New York: Hentage Press.
Gartz, R. 1970. Adaptationsmorphologie der Melanophoren
von Krdenfrosch-Larven. Cytabwlogie 2:220-234.
Gascon, C. 1989a. The tadpole of Atelupus puuer Boulenger
(Anura, Bufonidae) from Manaus, Amazonas. Rev.Brasil.
Zool. 6:235-239.
. 1989b. Predator-preysize interaction in tropical ponds.
Rev.Brasil. Zool. 6: 701-706.
. 1991a. Breeding of leptodmtylus kndeni: Responses
to rainfd vanation. Copeia 1991:248-252.
. 1991b. Population- and community-leve1analyses of
species occurrences of central Amazonian rainforest tadpoles. Ecology 72: 1731-1746.
. 1992a. Spatial distribution of Osteocephaus taurinus
and Pipa avabali in a central Amazonian forest. Copeia
19923894-897.
. 1992b. The effects of reproductive phenology on larval
performance traits in a three-species assemblage of central
Amazonian tadpoles. Oikos 65 :307-3 13.
. 1992c. Aquatic predators and tadpole prey in central
Amazonia: Field data and experimental manipulations. Ecology 73:971-980.
. 1995. Tropical larval anuran fimess in the absence
of direct effects of predation and competition. Ecology
76:2222-2229.
Gascon, C., and J. R Bider. 1985. The effea of pH on buiifrog,
Rana catesbeiana, and green fiog, Rana clamitans melanota,
tadpoles. CanadianField Nat. 99:259-261.
Gates, W R. 1983. A comparison of the embryonic and larval
development of the southem chorus frog, Psm*
nigrita
nigrita (LeConte), and the upland c h o m frog, P s e M s
~nieriataferarum(Baird), in Alabama. Thesis, Auburn University.
Gatherer, D., and E. M. De1 Pino. 1992. Somitogenesis in the
marsupial frog Gastrotheca riobambae. Intl. J. Develup. Bwl.
36:283-291.
Gatten, R E., Jr., J. I? Caldweii, and M. E. Stockard. 1984. Anaerobic metabolism during intense swimming by anuran larvae. Hepetologica 40:164-169.
Gatten, R E., Jr., K. Miiier, and R. J. F d . 1992. Energetics of
amphibians at rest and during locomotion. pp. 314-377. In
Environmental physwlogy of the amphibians, edited by M. E.
Feder and W W Burggren. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Gaupp, E. 1893. Beitrage zur Morphologie des Sch'adels. I:
Primordial-Cranium und Kieferbogen von Ranafisica.Morphol. Arb. 2:275481.
'
371
372
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
Gordon, M. S. 1962. Osmotic regulation in the green toad
(Bufiviridis).J. Exp. Bwl. 39:261-270.
Gordon, M. S., and V. A. Tucker. 1965. Osmotic regulation in
the tadpoles of the crab-eating fiog (Ranacanm'vora).J Exp.
Bwl. 42:437445.
Gorham, E., S. J. Eisenreich, J. Ford, and M. V. Santelmann.
1985. The chemistry of bog waters. pp. 339-363. In Chemicnlprocesses in labes, edited by W. Stumm. New York: Wdey.
Gorlick, D. L., and D. B. Keiiey. 1987. Neurogenesis in the
vocalization pathway of Xenupus h i s . J. Comp. Neurol.
257:614-627.
Gomer, P. 1963. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Elektrophysiologie des Seiteniinieorgans vom Kraenfrosches
(Xenupushmis Daudin). Zeit. Ver~l.
Physiol. 47:316-338.
Gosner, K. L. 1959. Systematic variations in tadpole teeth with
notes on food. Herpeto@ca 15:203-2 10.
. 1960. A simpliied table for staging anuran embryos
and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetoh~ica
16:183-190.
Gosner, K. L., and I. H. Black. 1955. The effects of temperature
and moisture on the reproductive cycle of Scaphiopw h. holbrooki. A m k a n Midl. Nat. 54: 192-203.
. 1957a. Larvai development in New Jersey Hyiidae. Copeta 1957:31-36.
. 195%. The effects of acidity on the development and
hatching of New Jersey frogs. Eco&y 38:256-262.
Gotte, S. W., and R. P. Reynolds. 1998. Observations on the effects of akohol vs. formalin storage of amphibian larvae.
USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center homepage, <http:
,'/www.pwrc.nbs.gov/resshow/reynidlrs/amphhhd>.
Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogenyandphybeny. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Gradwell, N. 1968. The jaw and hyoidean mechanism of the
b&og tadpole during aqueous ventiiation. Canadian J
Zool. 46:1041-1052.
. 1969a. The function of the internai nares of the bullfiog tadpole. Herpeto@ca 25 :120-12 1.
. 1969b. The respiratory importance of vascularization
of the tadpole operculum in Rana catesbeiana Shaw. CanadianJ. Zool. 47: 1239-1243.
1 9 7 0 . The function of the ventral velum during gi irrigation in Rana catesbeiana. CanadianJ.Zwl. 48: 1179-1 186.
. 1971a. rlscaphus tadpole: Experiments on the suaion
and gi irrigation mechanism. Canadian J. Zool. 49:307332.
. 1971b.Xempustadpole: On the water pumping mechanism. Herpetoh&ca 27:107-123.
. 1972a. Comments on gdi irrigation in Rana&sc&uu.
Herpetoh~ica28: 122-125.
. 1972b. Gdi irrigation in Rana catesbeiana. Part I. On
the anatomicai basis. CanadianJ. Zwl. 50:481499.
. 1972c. Gdi irrigation in Rana catesbeiana. Part 11. On
the musculoskeletal mechanism. CanadianJ. Zool. 50:501521.
. 1973. On the functionai morphology of suction and
gdi irrigation in the tadpole ofrlscaphus,and notes on hibernation. Herpetoh~ica29:84-93.
. 1974. Description of the tadpole ofl'hrynomerwannectem, and comments on its gdi irrigation mechanism. Herpeto150BKlt 30:53-62.
. 1975a. The clinging mechanism of Pseuduphryne bibmni
(Anura: Leptodactyiidae)to an alga on glass. Trans.Roy. Soc.
South Australia 99:3 1-34.
. 1975b. Experiments on oral suaion and gdi breathing
373
374
LITERATURE CITED
brachyphona (Cope) with a descnption of the eggs and tadpole. Copeia 1938:79-82.
Greil, A. 1905. Ueber die Genese der Mundhohlenschleimhaut
der Urodelen. Anat. Anz. Suppl. 27, Verh.Anat. Ges. 19:2537.
Greven, H. 1980. Ultrastructural investigations of the epidermis and the giii epithelium in the intrauterine larvae of Salamandra salamundra (L.)(Amphibia, Urodela). Zeit. Mikros.
Anat. Fonch. 94: 196-208.
GriKths, I. 1961. The form and h c t i o n of the fore-gut in anuran larvae (Amphibia, Salientia) with particular reference to
the manicotto oglandulare. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lonhn 137:249283, 6 plates.
. 1963. The phylogeny of the Salientia. Bwl. Rev.
38 :24 1-292.
Grifiths, I., and A. L. De Carvalho. 1965. On the validity of
employing larval characters as major phyletic indices in Amphibia, Salientia. Rev. Brasil. Bwl. 25: 113-121.
Grifiths, R. A. 1986. Feeding niche overlap and food seleaion
in srnooth and paimate newts, Tritumw b a k and ?: helveticu4 at a pond in mid-Wales.J. Anim. Ecol. 55:201-214.
. 1991. Cornpetition between common frog, Rana temporaria, and natterjack toad, Bufo calamita, tadpoles: The
effect of cornpetitor density and interaaion level on tadpole
developrnent. Oikos 6 1:187-196.
. 1995. Determining cornpetition rnechanisrns in tadpole assemblages. Herpeto1.J.5:208-210.
Grifiths, R. A., and J. Denton. 1993. Interspecific associations
in tadpoles. Anim. Behav. 44: 1153-1157.
Grifiths, R. A., J. Denton, and A. L.-C. Wong. 1993. The
effect of food level on competition in tadpoles: Interferente
mediated by protothecan algae?J.Anim. Ewl. 62:274-279.
GriKths, R. A., P. W. Edgar, and A. L.-C. Wong. 1991. Interspecific cornpetition in tadpoles: Growth inhibition and
growth retrieval in natterjack toads, Bu? caiumita.J. Anim.
Ewl. 60: 1065-1076.
Grifiths, R. A., L. Schley, P. E. Sharp, J. L. Dennis, and A. Rornn. 1998. Behavioural responses of Mdorcan midwife
toad tadpoles to natural and unnatural snake predators.
Anim. Behav. 55 :207-214.
Griiiitsch, B. 1992. Notes on the tadpole of Phynohyas resinzjctrjc (Goeldi 1907). Buccopharyngeal and external rnorphology of a tree hole dweiiing larva (Anura, Hylidae). Herpetoma 5:5 1-66.
Griiiitsch, B., and H. Grillitsch. 1989. Teratological and ontogenetic alterations to extemal oral structure in some anuran
larvae (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae, Ranidae). Fortschrit.
Zool. 35:276-282.
Griilitsch, B., H. Grillitsch, and H. Splechtna. 1988. Zur Morphologie der larve von Tomoptema nyptotis (Bodenger
1907)(Amphibia:Anura: Ranidae). Herpetowa 1:31-46.
Griitsch, B., H. Grillitsch, M. Haupl, and F. Tiedemann.
1983. Lunhe und Kriechtiewe Neiabosteweichs. Wien:
Facultas-Verlag.
Griner, S. 1974. On the generation of locornotion in the spinal
dogfish. l%p.Brain Res. 20:459470.
Griner, S., and S. Kashin. 1976. On the generation and perforrnance of swimrning in fish. pp. 181-201. In Neural control
ofucomutwn, edited by R. M. Herrnan, S. Griner, P. S. G.
Stein, and D. G. Stuart. New York: Plenum.
Grobstein, P., and C. Comer. 1983. The nucleus isthmi as an
intertectal relay for the ipsilateral oculotectal projeaion in
the frog, Ranapipiens. J. Comp.Neurol. 2 17:54-74.
Grobstein, P., C. Comer, and S. Kostyk. 1980. The potential
LITERATURE CITED
. 1997a. The larval hyobranchial apparatus of discoglossoid fiogs: Its structure and bearing on the systematics of
the Anura (Amphibia: Anura). J. 2001. Syst. Evol. Res.
35: 179-197.
. 199%. Der larvale Hyobranchial-ApparatvonAscaphus
tnui (Anura: Ascaphidae) und das Grundmuster der Anura.
~~crhahungen
h-~eutschenZoologischen Geselhchaft, Mainz
90:172.
Haertel, J. D., and R. M. Storm. 1970. Experimental hybridization between Ranapetwsa and Rana mcadue. Herpetologica
26:43M6.
H&, J. H. 1974. Alkaline phosphatase activity in the developing pronephros and mesonephros of the frog Bombina orid.
KmeanJ. Zool. 17:177-184.
IIilman, J. P. 1976. Oii droplets in the eyes of adult anuran
amphibians:A comparative study.J.Morphol. 148:453468.
Hairston, N. G. 1989. Hard choices in ecological experimentation. Herpetologica 45 :119-122
Hakim, J., and J.-D. Gipouloux. 1978. Le dveloppement de
Fappareil urognital aprs Ia greffe htrotopique du msobiaste latral chez la neuruia du crapaud commun Bufo bufo
L (Arnphibien Anoure). 11. Inversion simultane des axes
mtro-postrieur et dorso-ventral de Ia lame latrale. J.
Emtnyol. l%p. Morphol. 44:113-119.
HaIi, J. A., J. H. Larsen, Jr., and R E. Fitzner. 1997. Postembryonic ontogeny of the spadefoot toad, Scaphwpus intemnmnus (Anura: Pelobatidae): External morphology. Herpetol.
Mimg1: (11):124-178.
Eia4 J. A., J. H. Larsen, Jr., D. E. Miller, and R. E. Fitzner.
1995. Discrimination of kin- and diet-based cues by larval
spadefoot toads, Scaphwpus intemntanus (Anura: Pelobatidae), under laboratory conditions.J. Herpetol. 29:233-243.
IW1, J. C., and A. S. Feng. 1987. Evidence for pardel processing in the frog's auditory thalamus. J. Comp. Neurol.
258:407419.
H d , R W. 1904. Development of the mesonephros and the
Mullerian ducts of Amphibia. Bull. Mus. Comp. 2001.
45:29-125.
Hamburger, V. 1988. The heritage of tzxperimental embryology:
H m Spemann and the organizei: New York: Oxford University Press.
Eiamiiton, W D. 1964a. The genetical evolution of social bek o r I, 11.J. Thm. Bwl. 7: 1-52.
. 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.
J Bem Bwl. 7:l-16.
1 9 6 4 ~The
. genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.J.
Thcor: Bwl. 7: 17-52.
. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theol: Bwl.
31:295-311.
Hmimerman, D. L. 1965. Development of the tongue of Rana
dunitans. Ameriutn 2001.5 :250-25 1. (Abstr.)
. 1969a. The frog tongue: I. General development and
histogenesis of iiiform papillae and mucous giands in Rana
atesbeiana. Acta 2001.50: 11-23.
. 1969b. The frog tongue: 11. Histogenesis of fungform
papillae in Rana catesbeiana. Acta 2001.50:25-33.
. 1969c. The frog tongue: 111. Histogenesis and regeneraion following complete and partial extirpation of anlagen.
Ada 2001. 50:215-232.
HImmerschlag, R., S. Maines, and M. Ando. 1989. Sensory
&a
fiom tadpoles but not adult bulifrogs synthesize heat
&o&-like proteins in vitro at non-heat shock temperatures.
J ATmrosci.Res. 23:4 16424.
Ehnpton, S. H., and E. E Volpe. 1963. Development and in-
375
terpopulation variability of the mouthparts of Scaphwpus holbrooki.Ammican Midl. Nat. 70:3 19-328.
Hanke, W. 1976. Neuroendocrinology. pp. 975-1022. In Frog
neuroendominology,edited by R Llins and W. Precht. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
Hanken, J. 1983. Miniaturization and its etfects on cranial morphology in plethodontid salamanders, genus Thmius (Amphibia, Plethodontidae): 11. The fate of the brain and sense
organs and their role in skul morphogenesis and evolution.
J.Morphol. 177:255-268.
. 1984. Miniaturization and its effects on cranial morphology in plethodontid salamanders, genus Thmius (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). I. Osteological variation. Bwl. J.
Linnean SOL.23:55-75.
. 1986. Developmental evidence for amphibians origins.
pp. 389417. In Evolutwnary bwlogy, Vol. 20, edited by
M. K. Hecht, B. Waace, and G. T. Prance. New York:
Plenum.
Hanken, J., and B. K. Ha. 1984. Variation and timing of the
cranial ossification sequence of the Oriental fire-beliied toad,
Bombinu mientalis (Amphibia, Discogiossidae). J. Movphol.
182:245-255.
. 1988. Skul development during anuran metamorphosis: I. Early development of the first three bones to formthe exoccipital, the parasphenoid, and the frontoparietal. J.
Mmphol. 195:247-256.
Hanken, J., D. H. Jennings, and L. Olsson. 1997. Mechanistic
basis of life-history evolution in anuran amphibians: Direct
development.A k a n 2001.37: 160-171.
Hanken, J., M. W. Klymkowsky, C. H. Summers, D. W. Seufert, and N. Ingebrigtsen. 1992. Cranial ontogeny in the
direct-developing frog, Eleutherodactylus cogui (Anura: Leptodactylidae), analyzed using whole-mount immunohistochemistry. J. Morphol. 21 1:95-118.
Hanken, J., and C. H. Surnrners. 1988. Developmental basis of
evolutionary success: Cranial ontogeny in a directdeveloping anuran. American Zool. 28: 12. (Abstr.)
Hanken, J., and D. B. Wake. 1993. Miniaturization of body
size: Organismal consequences and evolutionary significance. Ann. &v. Ewl. Syst. 24:501-5 19.
Hardy, J. D., Jr. 1984. Frogs, egg teeth, and evolution: Preliminary conunents on egg teeth in the genus Eleutherodactylw.
Bull. Maryiund Herpetol. Soc. 20: 1-1 1.
Harkey, G. A., and R. D. Semiitsch. 1988. Effects of temperature on growth, development, and color polymorphism in
the ornate c h o m fiog Pseudacris omata. Cupeia 1988:10011007.
Harpur, R E 1968. Osmoregulation et metabolisme de I'uree:
Cornparison entre Bufo vi& et Rana temporaria. Canudian
J. 2001.46:295-301.
Harris, R. N. 1987. Density-dependent paedomorphosis in the
salamanderNotuphthalmusviridesgns abrsalis. Ewlogy 68:7057 1?
LL.
. 1989. Ontogenetic changes in size and shape of the facultatively paedomorphic salamander Notuphthalmus v i d a censhalis. Cupeia 1989:3542.
Harris, R. N., R. A. Aiford, and H. M. Wiibur. 1988. Density
and phenology of Notuphthalmusviridescem h a l i s in a natural pond. Herpetologia 44:234-242.
Harris, R. N., R. D. Semiitsch, H. M. Wdbur, and J. E. Fauth.
1990. Local variation in the genetic basis of paedomorphosis in the salamander Am6ystoma talpoideum. Evolutwn
44: 1588-1603.
Harrison, J. D. 1987. Food and feeding relations of common
376
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
. 1991. Predation, palatability, and the distribution of
tadpoles in the Amazon rainforest. Dissertation, Griffith
University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Hero, J.-M., and A. Mijares-Urrutia. 1995. The tadpole of Scinax mstrata ( h a : Hylidae).$ Heyletol. 29:307-311.
Hhn-Royer, and C. Van Bambeke. 1881. Sur les caractkres
fournis par la bouche des tttards des batraciens anoures
#Europe. BuU. Soc. Zol. France 6:75-81.
. 1889. Le vestibule de la bouche chez les t&ards des
batraciens anoures #Europe. Arch. B d . 9:185-309, plates
12-24.
Herreid, C. F., 11, and S. Kinney. 1966. Survival of Alaskan
woodfrog (Ram sylvatica) larvae. Ecology 47: 1039-1041.
. 1967. Temperature and development of the woodfrog,
Ram sylvatica, in Alaska. Ecology 48: 579-590.
Herrick, C. J. 1909. The nervus terminalis (nerve of Pinkus) in
the frog.$ Comp.Neurol. 19:175-190.
. 1948. The brain ofthe t&wsalama& Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hetherington, T. E. 1987. Timing of development of the
middle ear of Anura (Amphibia). Zoommpholoogy 106:289300.
. 1988. Metamorphic changes in the middle ear. pp.
339-357. In The evolutwnofthe amphibianauditolysystem, edited by B. Fritzsch, M. J. Ryan, W Wilczynski, T. E. Hetherington, and W Walkowiak. New York: Wiley.
Heusser, H. 1970a. Spawn eating by tadpoles as possible
cause of specific biotope preferences and short breeding
times in European anurans (Amphibia Anura). Oemloogia
4:83-88.
. 1970b. Laich-Fressen durch Kaulquappen als mogliche
Ursache spezifischer Biotopprgerenzen und irurzer Laichzeiten bei europiiischen Froschlurchen (Amphibia, Anura).
Oemloga 4:83-88.
. 1971. Laich-Raubern und Kannibalismus bei sympamsher Anuran-Kaulquappen. Expen'entia 27:474475.
Hemltt, J. 1927. Further descriptions of reptiles and batrachians
from South Africa. &c. Albany M s . 3:371415.
Hews, D. K. 1988. Alarm response in larval western toads, Bufo
bmeas: Release of larval chemicals by a natural predator and
its effect on predator capture efficiency. Anim. Behm.
36:125-133.
. 1995. Overall predator feeding rates and relative susceptibility of large and small tadpoles to fish predation
depend on microhabitat: A laboratory study. J. Hqetol.
29: 142-145.
Hews, D. K., and A. R. Blaustein. 1985. An investigation of
the alarm response in Bufo bmeas and Rana cuscadae tadpoles.
Behav. Neural Bwl. 43 :47-57.
Heyer, W. R. 1969. The adaptive ecology of the species groups
of the genus Lepto+hs
(Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Emlutwn 23:421428.
. 1971. Descriptions of some tadpoles from Thailand.
Fkldiana Z d . 58:83-91.
. 1973a. Systematics of the mamratus group of the frog
genus Leptodmtylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Nat. Hist.
Mw. b s Anogeles Co. Con&. Sci. (251):1-50.
. 1973b. Ecological interactions of frog larvae at a seasonal tropical location in Thailand.$ He'petol. 7~337-361.
. 1974. Niche measurements of frog larvae from a seasonal tropical location in Thailand. Ecology 55651-656.
. 1976a. Studies in larval amphibian habitat partitioning.
Smithsonian Contrib. Zool. (242) :1-27.
377
378
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
E b q R B. 1980. Sprint velocity of tadpoles (Bufo boreas)
through rnetamorphosis. Copeia 1980:537-540.
R B., and R. D. Stevenson. 1979. Integrating therrnai
ph?xiology and ecology of ectotherms: A discussion of appnraches. Amen'cun Zool. 19:357-366.
E+-.
R B., and T. P. Webster. 1976. Thermai biology ofAnolis
Inards in a cornplex fauna: The cvistatellus group on h e r t o
Rioo. ECO& 57:985-994.
Ebgks, k 1957. The developrnent of the primary sensory systini inXlpnopus Lami (Daudin).J. Anat. 91 :323-338.
. 1959. Studies in embryonic and larvai developrnent in
-3mphibia. I. The embryology of Elezttherodactylus ricordii
dspeciai referente to the spinai c0rd.J. Embryol.Exp. MorH.
722-38.
. 1961. Ceil degeneration in the larvai ventral horn of
Xmopshmi (Daudin).J. Embyol. Exp. Morphol. 9:269-284.
. 1962. An experimental study of the relationships bem-een h b and spinai cord of the ernbryo of Ehthevwdactyhrr martiniansis.J.Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 10:575-601.
. 1966. The thyroid and the developrnent of the nervous
-em
in Eleutherodactylus martinicensis: An experimental
&.J. Embyol. Exp.Morphol. 16:401-430.
. 1976. Metamorphic changes in the brain and spinai
d.
pp. 856-863. In Fmg neurobwlogy, a handbook, edited
R Llins and W. Precht. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
iingk, A., and M. C. Prestige. 1967. Developrnent of behaviour in the hindlimb ofXenopus 1mi.J.
Zool. 152:347-359.
Ebgks, A., and P. Reier. 1972. A prelirninary study of the
cdeirs of bovine prolactin on embryos of Ekutherodactylus
d i i . Gen. Comp. E n d o h l . 19:304-312.
Ehkebus, J., and E. S. Farrar. 1985. Insulin-like irnrnunoreacmity in serum and pancreas of metamorphosing tadpoles.
Grn. Comp. Endoc~z'ml.58:114-119.
Hndey, M. B. 1958. The role of the thyroid in kidney development in the tadpole. W h 22:125-166.
H.nxhke, E. 1826. Uber die Urnbildung des Darmkanais und
der Kiernen der Froschkaulquappen. Isis von Oken: 613-627.
Y ' on, T. 1796. The natural history of theflofifih of Surinum. 8 p., 4 plates. York: G. Peacock.
Hinchison, V. H., and R K. Dupr. 1992. Therrnoregulation.
pp. 206-249. In Environmental physi4@y of the amphibians,
cdited by M. E. Feder and W. W. Burggren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hmchison, V. H., and C. G. Hill. 1978. Therrnai selection of
bullfrog tadpoles (Rana catesbeiana) at different stages of developrnent and acclirnation temperatura. J. Them. Bwl.
357-60.
Hutchison, V . H., and J. D. Maness. 1979. The role of behavior
in ternperature acclimation and tolerante in ectotherrns.
h m i c a n Zool. 19:367-384.
H d e y , J. 1942. Evolution: The m d e m syzthesis. New York:
Harper and Brothers.
H d e y , T H. 1858. On the theory of the vertebrate s k d . Proc.
Roy. Soc.Lonhn 9:381457.
I d o , J. M. 1997. Morphogenesis of vertebrate hearts. pp.
114-1 26. In Deve@ment of cardiovascular systems.Molecules to
qanisms, edited by M. E. Feder and W. W. Burggren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
&ya-Oka,
A., and A. Shimozawa. 1987. Developrnent of
the comective tissue in the digestive tract of the larvai and
metamorphosingXenopus W s .Anat. Anz. 164:8 1-93.
Ideker, J. 1976. Tadpole therrnoregulatory behavior facilitates
grackle predation. TmasJ. Sci. 27:244-245.
w.
'
379
380
LITERATURE CITED
Inger, R. F., and R. J. Wassersug. 1990. A centrolenid-like anuran larvae from southeast Asia. Zool. Sci. 7:557-561.
Ingerman, R. L. 1992. Maternal-fetal oxygen transfer in lower
vertebrates.American Zool. 32:322-330.
Ingle, D. 1976. Behavioral correlates of central visual funaion
in anurans. pp. 435-451. In Frog neurobwlagy, a handbook,
edited by R. Llins and W. Precht. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Ingram, G. J., M. Anstis, and C. J. Corben. 1975. Observations
on the Australian leptodactylid frog, Asa darlingtoni. Hwpetolagku 31 :425429.
Ingram, V N . 1972. Embryonic red blood cell formation. Nature 3351339.
Inokuchi, T., K. I. Kobayashi, and S. Horiuchi. 1991. Acid proteinases of the fore-gut in metamorphosing tadpoles ofRana
catesbeiana. Comp.Bwchem. Physwl. 99B:653-662.
Ishizuya-Oka, A,, and A. Shimozawa. 1990. Changes in lectinbinding pattern in the digestive tract of Xenopw h&s during
metamorphosis. 11. S m d intestine.J. Morphol. 205:9-15.
Ison, R. E. 1968. The development of the heart of Rana tempuraria L.J. Nat. Hist. 2 9 9 4 5 7 .
Istock, C. A. 1967. The evolution of complex life cycle phenomena: An ecological perspective. Evolution 21 :592-605.
. 1984. Boundaries to life histoty variation and evolution. pp. 143-168. InA new ewlagy: Nmel appvomhes to intwactive qtems, edited by P. W. Price, C. N. Slobodchikoff, and
W S. Gaud. New York: Wiley.
Iwasawa, H., and M. Kobayashi. 1976. Development of the testis in the frog Rana nigrommulata, with special referente to
germ ceil maturation. Copeia 1976:461-467.
Iwasawa, H., and K. Yamaguchi. 1984. Ultrastructural study
of gonadal development in Xenopus h&s. Zool. Sci. 1:591600.
Izecksohn, E. 1997. Novo enero de Hylidae Brasileiro (Arnphibia, Anura). Rev. Uniu. Rural, Sk Cinc. Vida 18:4752.
Izecksohn, E., and C. A. G. Da Cruz. 1972. Notas sobre os girinos de Dendrophryniscus leucomystax Izecksohn e D. brevipollicatus Espada (Amphibian, Anura, Bufonidae).Arq. Univ.Fed.
Rural Rio deJaneiro 2:63-69.
. 1976. Nova espcies de Phyilomedusinae do Estado do
Esprito Santo, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). h.
Brasil. Biol. 36:257-261.
Izecksohn, E., C. A. G. Da Cruz, and 0. L. Peixoto. 1979. Notas sobre o girino de Proceratophrys boiei (Wied)(Amphibia,
Anura, Leptodactylidae). Rev. Brasil. Bwl. 39:233-236.
Izecksohn, E., and S. T. De Aibuquerque. 1972. Algumas observaes sobre o desenvolvimento de Eleuthwodactylus venancwi B. Lutz (Amphibia, Anura). Arq. Univ. Fed. Rural Rio
deJaneiro 2:13-15.
Izecksohn, E., J. Jim, S. T. De Aibuquerque, and W F. De Mendona. 1971. Observaes sobre o desenvolvimento e os
hbitos de Myeniella szlbnigra (Miranda-Ribeiro).Arq. Mus.
Nm. Rio deJaneiro 54:69-73.
Jacobson, A. G., and J. T. Duncan. 1968. Heart induction in
salamanders.J Exp. Zool. 167:79-103.
Jacobson, C. M. 1968. The development of the chondrocranium in two species of the Australian anuran genus Pseuabphryne Fitzinger.AustralianJ.Zool. 16:1-15.
Jacoby, J., and K. Rubinson. 1983. The acoustic and lateral line
nuclei are distinct in the premetamorphic frog, Rana catesbeiuna.J. Comp.Neurol. 216:152-161.
Jaeger, C. B., and D. E. H i h a n . 1976. ~Morphologyof gustatory organs. pp. 588-606. In Frg neurobwhgy, a handbook,
edited by R. Llins and W. Precht. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
LITERATURE CITED
381
382
LITERATURE CITED
. 1969. Evolutwn and cmparative morphology ofthe lymphaticsystem. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Kanamadi, R. D., and S. K. Saidapur. 1988. Effea of fat body
ablation on spermatogenesis in the Indian skipper frog Rana
cyamph&ctis Schn. Zool. Anz. 220: 79-8 1.
Kaplan, M. 1994. A new species of frog of the genus Hyh from
the Cordillera Oriental in northern Colombia with comments on the taxonomy of Hyh minuta. J. Herpetol.
28: 79-87.
Kaplan, R. H. 1992. Greater maternal investment can decrease
offspring survival in the frog Bombina orientalis. Ewlogy
73:280-288.
Karlson, P. 1972. Kunes Lehrbuch der Biochemie. Stuttgart:
Georg Thieme-Verlag.
Karlstrom, E. L. 1962. The toad genus Bufo in the Sierra Nevada of California: Ecological and systematic relationships.
Univ. C a l f m i a Publ. Zool. 62: 1-104.
Karnovsky, M. J. 1965. A forrnaldehyde-glutaraldehydefixative
of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell.
Bwl. 27A:137-138.
Kasinathan, S., A. Gunashing, and S. L. Basu. 1978. Fat bodies
and spermatogenesis in South Indian green frog &na hma+h Lesson. Boll. Zool. 45: 15-22.
Kats, L. B., J. W. Petranka, and A. Sih. 1988. Antipredator defenses and the persistente of amphibian larvae with fishes.
Ecology 69: 1865-1870.
Katz, L. C., M. J. Potel, and R J. Wassersug. 1981. Structure
and mechanisms of schooiing in tadpoles of the dawed frog,
XenUpus hn&.Anim. Behav. 29:20-33.
Katz, M. J. 1980. Allometry formula: A cellular model. Growth
44:89-96.
Kaung, H. C. 1975. Development of the horny jaws of Rana
pipiens larvae. Develop. Bwl. 11: 2 5 4 9 .
. 1981. Immunocytochemical localization of pancreatic
endocrine ceiis in frog embryos and young larvae. Gen.
C m p . Endom'ml. 45 :204-2 11.
. 1983. Changes of pancreatic beta cell population during larval development in Ranapipiens. Gen. Comp.Endocrinol. 49:50-56.
Kaung, H. C., and J. J. Kollros. 1976. CeU turnover in the beak
of Ranapipiens.Anat. Rec. 188:361-370.
Kawada, J., R. E. Taylor, Jc, and S. B. Barker. 1969. Measurement of Na-K-ATPase in the separated epidermis of Rana
catesbeianu frogs and tadpoles. Comp. Bwchem. Physwl.
30:965-975.
Kawai, A., J. Ibeya, and K. Yoshizato. 1994. A three-step mechanism of action of thyroid hormone and mesenchyme in
metamorphic changes in anuran larval skin. Develop. Bwl.
166:477488.
Kawamura, T., and M. Kobayashi. 1960. Studies on hybridization in amphibians. VII. Hybrids benveen Japanese and European brown frogs.J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. 18B:221-238.
Keating, M. J., and R. M. Gaze. 1970. The ipsilateral retinotectal pathway in the frog. Quart.J.Exp. Physiol. 55:284292.
Kehr, A. I. 1989. Factores dependientes de Ia densidad y influencia sobre e1 crecimiento individual de 10s estados larvales de Hyh pukhelh p u e (Amphibia Anura). Limno~ W 2:757-761.
S
. 1997. Stage-frequencyand habitat seleaion of a cohort
of Pseuhmi ocuhris tadpoles (Hyiidae: Anura) in a Florida
temporary pond. Herpetol.J. 7: 103-109.
Kehr, A. I., and E. O. Adema. 1990. Crecimento corporal y analises estadistico de Ia frequencia por clases de edades de 10s
LITERATURE CITED
column neurons during the phase of rapid ceii loss after limb
amputation in Ranapipns tadpo1es.J Ekp. Zool. 236: 59-66.
E;han, M. S. 1982a. Key to the identification of amphibian
tadpoles from the plains of Pakistan. PakZrcan J. Zool.
14:133-145.
. 1982b. Coilection, preservation, and identification of
amphibian eggs frorn the plains of Pakistan. PakistanJ.Zool.
14:241-243.
b,
M. S., and S. A. Malik. 1987. Buccopharyngeal rnorphology of the tadpole ofRanahazarensis Dubois and Khan
1978, and its tomenticole adaptations. Biologia (Lahme)
33:45-60.
Khan, M. S., and S. A. Mufti. 1994. Oral disc rnorphology of
amphibian tadpole and its functional correlates. Pakistan
J. Zool. 26~25-30.
Kdter, E. 1979. Some telencephalic comections in the frog,
Ranupipns. J Comp.Neurol. 185:75-86.
Kdter, E., and S. O. E. Ebbesson. 1976. Organization of the
'non-olfactory" telecephalon. pp. 946-972. In Frog neurobi& I , a handbook, edited by R. &s and W. Precht. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
&&ter, E., and R. G. Northcutt. 1975. Ascending derents to
the telencephalon of ranid frogs: An anterograde degeneration study.J. C m p . Neurol. 161:239-254.
k c k e r , J. 1996. pH-mediated predator-prey interactions bemeen Ambystoma tgrinum and PseudL1E?.striimata. Ecol.
4 1 . 6: 1325-1331.
Kiiham, P. 1982.The biogeochernistry of bog ecosystems and the
chemical ecology of S p h a p m . MiEhigan Bot. 21: 159-168.
Edahi, M. 1938. Zur Entwicklung der Exkretionsorgane von
Dipnoern und Amphibien rnit Anmerkungen bezuglich
Ganoiden und Teleostier.Acta Zool. 19:1-190.
lkdred, J. E. 1927. Ceil division and ciliogenesis in the ciliated
epithelium of the pharynx and esophagus of the tadpole of
&e green frog, Rana clamitans.J. Morphol. 43:267-297.
i&g, M. 1981. A cytotaxonomic analysis of Australian hylid
frogs of the genus Litoria. Proc. Hepetol. Symp., Melbourne
169-1- .75.
-.
W b u r y , B. F. 1895. The lateral line system of sense organs
in some American Amphibia, and cornparison with the dipmans. Trans.A m ' m n MiFIos. SOL. 17:115-154.
b e y , E. C. 1964. Extent of acid mine poilution in the United
States decting fish and wildlife. United States Fkh Wildl.
Cin. 191. 27 p.
Kinisinghe, P. 1957. Amphibia of Ceyon. Published privately,
Colornbo.
. 1958. Some hitherto undescribed anuran tadpoles. CeyhJ.
Sci. 1:171-176
Eseleva, E. I. 1984. Responses of behavioral reactions in the
Rama tempmaria tadpoles to chemical stimuii under the conditions of pretreatrnent. 201Zhur
.
63: 1046-1054.
. 1992. h i n o acid sensitivitv in tad~oiesof the s ~ a d e foot toad Peobatesfuscus. J. ~voL.'~iocheh.
Pbysiol. 28r527330.
. 1997. Aspects of the chemicai ecology and chemosensoy guided behavioral reactions in anuran tadpoles. Adv.
h p h i b . Res. Fom. Soviet Unwn 2:95-101.
&eleva, E. I., and Y. B. Manteifel. 1982. Behavioral reactions
of Bujb bufo and Rana tempmaria tadpoles to chemical stimuli. Zool. Zhur 61 :1669-1681.
Kkm, S. L., and l? l?C. Graziadei. 1983. The differentiation of
the olfactory placode in Xenupus L&:
A light and electron
microscope study. J. Comp.Neuml. 217: 17-30.
-~
383
Kiuge, A. G. 1988. The characterization of ontogeny. pp. 5781. In Ontogeny and ystematics, edited by C. J. Humphries.
New York: Columbia University Press.
. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epzirates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38: 7-25.
Kiuge, A. G., and J. S. Farris. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and
the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zml. 18:1-32.
Kiuge, A. G., and R. E. Strauss. 1985. Ontogeny and systernatics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:247-268.
Kiuger, M. J. 1978. The evolution and adaptive value of fever.
American Sci. 66: 38-43.
Kiymkowsh M. W., and J. Hanken. 1991. Whole-rnount
staining of Xenupus and other vertebrates. Meth. Cell Bwl.
36:419-441.
Kobayashi, M. 1975. Sexual and bilateral d8erences in germ
ceil numbers in the course of the gonadal developrnent of
Rana n&omb~uhta. Zool. Mag. (Tokyo) 84: 109-1 14.
Kok, D., L. H. Du Preez, and A. Channing. 1989. Channel construction by the African bullfiog: Another anuran parenta1
care strategy.J. Hepetol. 23:435437.
Koilros, J. J. 1961. Mechanisrns of amphibian rnetamorphosis:
Hormones. American Zool. 1:107-114.
. 1981. Transitions in the nervous systern during amphibian metamorphosis. pp. 445459. In Metamo?.phosk:A
problem in dmehpmental bwlogy. 2d ed., edited by L. I. Gilbert
and E. Frieden. New York: Plenum.
. 1984. Growth and death of ceils of the rnesencephalic
fifth nucleus in Rana pipiens larvae. J. Comp. Neurol.
224:386-394.
Koiiros, J. J., and i?M. McMurray. 1956. The rnesencephalic V
nucleus in anurans. 11.The iduence of thyroid hormone on
cell size and ceil number.J. Exp. Zool. 131:1-26.
Koiiros, J. J., and M. L. Thiesse. 1985. Growth and death of
ceils of the mesence~halicMih nucleus in Xe-s
hmis larvae.J. C m p . Neurol. 233:481489.
Kopsch, F. 1952. Die Enhvicklung des braunen Grasf?.osches
Rana fusca Roesel (DargereUt in der Art der Nwmentafeln zur
Enhvicklun.eschiEhte der Wirbeltiere). Stuttgart: Georg
Thieme-Verlag.
Korky, J. K., and R. G. Webb. 1973. The larva of the Mexican
toad Bufo caazfroons W1egrnann.J Hepetol. 7:4749.
. 1991. Geographic variation in larvae of rnountain treefrogs of the Hyh mimia group (Anura: Hylidae). Bull. New
J e q A c a d . Sci. 36:7-12.
. 1994. A scanning electron microscope study of the larval labial teeth of Rama montezum. Bull.Maryland Hepetol.
Soc. 30: 126-131.
. 1996. Morphological variation in larvae of Rana tempmaria L. (Anura: Ranidae) in the Republic of Ireland. I&
Biqgeograph. Soc. Bull. (19):159-181.
Koskela, P. 1973. Duration of the Iamal stage, growth, and migration in Rana temporaria L. in two ponds in northern Finland in relation to environrnental factors. Ann. Zool. Fennici
10:414-418.
Kothbauer, H., and H. Schenkel-Brunner. 1981. Immunochemicai investigations on fish eggs and toad spawn: On the
appearance of glycosidases during the hatching process. Zool.
Anz. 206:354-360.
Kotthaus, A. 1933. Die Entwicklung des Primordial-cranium
von Xenupus hmis bis zue Metarnorphose. Zeit. Wiss. Zool.
144:510-572.
Kraemer, M. 1974. La morphogense du chondrocrne de DkA
-
384
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
ment larvaires de Phrynobatra~husfiancisci.Bull. Inst. France
AfiqueNoire 20: 1071-1086.
Larnotte, M., S. Dzieduszydra, and G. Lauwarier. 1958. Contribution a l'etude des Batrauens de l'Ouest afncain. VIII. Les
formes larvaires de l'tychadenasubmasuweniensis,Pt. tournien
et Pt. tnnodis. BuU. Inst. France Afique Noire 20:14641482.
Lamotte, M., R Gaon, and F. Xavier. 1973. Recherches sur le
dveloppement embryonnaire de Nectophrynoides occdentalis
Angel arnphibien anoure vivipare. 2. Le dveloppement des
gonades. Ann. Embyol. Mo'phogen. 6:271-296.
Lamotte, M., and J. Lescure. 1977. Tendances adaptives a
l'afianchissement due miiieu aquatique chez les arnphibiens
anoures. Tewe Vie 31:225-312.
. 1989. Les ttards rhophiles et hygroptriques de I'Ancien et due Nouveau Monde. Ann. Sci. Nat., Zool., Paris
1O:lll-122,125-144.
Larnotte, M., and J.-L. Perret. 1961a. Contribution I'tude
des Batraciens de I'Ouest africain. XI. Les formes larvaires de
trois espcies de l'tychadena:Pt. maccarthyensis And., Pt. perreti G. et L., et Pt. mascareniensis D. et B. Bull. Inst. France
Afnsue Noire 23A: 192-210.
. 1961b. Contribution I'tude de Batraciens de l'Ouest
africain. XIII. Les formes larvaires de quelques especes de
Leptopelis: L. aubryi, L. viridis, L. anchietae, L. oceliutus et L. calcaratus. Bull. Inst. France Afique Noire 23:855-885.
. 1963a. Contribution l'tude de Batraciens de l'Ouest
africain. XIi? Les dveloppement larvaire de Chiromantis
mfescens Gnther. Bull. Inst. F ~ r a Afnsue
n
Noire 25:266276.
. 1963b. Contribution I'tude de Batraciens des I'Ouest
africain. XV. Le dveloppement direct de l'espce Arthroieptis
poecilonotus Peters. Bull. Inst. France Afique Noire 25:277284.
. 1963c. Contribution l'tude de Batraciens de I'Ouest
africain. XVI. Les formes larvaires de cnq espcies d'Hyperolius de Cameroun: H. hierogl'ycus, H. steindachm'pardulir,
H. uutiro~tni,H. vi~dzfivus,H. tuberculatus. BuU. Inst.
FmnaAfique Noire 25: 545-558.
Larnotte, M., J.-L. Perret, and S. Dzieduszycka. 1959a. Contributions l'tude des Batraciens de I'Ouest africain. IX.Les
formes larvaires de Petropedetes palmiper, Conrarra goliath
et Acanthij,alus spinosus. Bull. Inst. France Afnsue Noire
2 1:762-776.
. 1959b. Contributions I'tude des Batraciens de
I'Ouest africain. X. Les formes larvaires de Cyptothykzxgresho$, Lqptopelis notatus et Ptychadenu tmnwcelk. Bull. Inst.
FmeAfiqueNoire 21:1336-1350.
Lamotte, M., and F. Xavier. 1972. Recherches sur le dveloppement embryonnaire de Nectophrynoiaes occidentalk Angel, amphibien anoure vivipare. I. Les principaux traits morphologiques et biometriques de dveloppement. Ann. Embryol.
Morphol. 5:315-340.
. 1973. Le dveloppement des gonades et Ia difFrentiation sexuelle chez I'embryon de Neccophrynoides occidentalis
Angel. Symbwsis 4:259-261.
Lamotte, M., and M. Zuber-Vogeli. 1954a. Contribution
I'tude des Batraciens de I'Ouest africain. 11. Le dveloppement larvaire de Bufo rguaris Reuss, de Rana occz'dentalis
Gnther et de Rana crassipes (Buch. et Peters). Bull. Inst.
France A f i q w Noire 16:940-954.
. 1954b. Contribution I'tude des Batraciens de
I'Ouest-africain. 111. Les dveloppement larvaire de deux es-
385
pcies rhophiles, Astylosternus diadematus et Petropedetes nutatol: Bull. Inst. France Afjtgue Noire 16:1222-1233.
. 1956. Les formes larvaire de Chiromuntis mfescens,
Ajkalus ~tosomusfilvovittatus, and &sina senegaiensis.
Bull. Inst. France Afique Noire 18:863-876.
Lancaster, J., and A. G. Hiidrew. 1993. Characterizing instrearn f l o refugia.
~
CanadianJ. Fish. Aqrrat. Sci. 50: 16631675.
Lannoo, M. J. 1985. Neuromast topography inAmbystoma larvae. Copeia 1985:535-539.
. 1987. Neuromast topography in anuran arnphibians.
J Morphol. 191:115-129.
. 1988. The evolution of the arnphibian lateral line system and its bearing on arnphibian phylogeny. Zeit. Zool. Syst.
Ev01.-Fmsch.26: 128-134.
Lannoo, M. J., and S. C. Smith. 1989. The lateral line system.
pp. 176-186. In Deve@mental biology of the axolotl, edited by
J. B. Armstrong and G. M. Malacinski. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lannoo, M. J., D. S. Townsend, and R. J. Wassersug. 1987.
Larval iife in the leaves: Arboreal tadpole types, with special
attention to the morphology, ecology, and behavior of the
oophagous Osteopilus bmnneus (Hyiidae) larva. Fieldiana
2001.
(N.S.) (38):1-31.
Lanza, B. 1983. Guideperi1 riconoscimnto delle specie animali delle
q u e i n t m Italiane 27. Anfibi, Rettili. Consiglio Nazionale
delie Ricerche.
Largen, M. J. 1975. The status of the genus &sina (Amphibia
Anura Hyperoliidae) in Ethiopia. Monit. 2001.Italiano
Su.1. 6: 1-28.
Larseli, 0.1925. The development of the cerebellum in the frog
(Hyhregilla) in relation to the vestibular and lateral-line systems.J. Comp.Neurol. 39:249-289.
. 1934. The difFerentiation of the peripheral and central
acoustic apparatus in the frog. J. Comp. Neurol. 60:473527.
. 1967. The wmparative anutomy and histology of the emebellumf?om myxinoidr through birak. Edited by J. Jansen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Larson, ,!I and R O. De S. 1998. Chondroaanial morphology of Leptoductylus larvae (Leptodactylidae: Leptodactylinae): Its utility in phylogenetic reconstruction. J. Morphol.
238:287-305.
Larson-Prior, L. J., and W. L. R Cmce. 1992. The red nucleus
and mesencephalic tegmentum in a ranid arnphibian: A cytotechtonic and HRP conneaional study. Bmin Behav. Evol.
40:273-286.
Lataste, F. 1879. tude sur le Discoglosse. Actes Soc. Linneenne
Bordeaux 33: 275-341, plates 3-5.
Latsis, R. V., and N. Y. Saraeva. 1980. Development of hemopoietic tissue in Rana temporaria. Arkh. Anat. Gistol. Emb h l . 78: 100-105.
Lauder, G. i?1981. Form and funaion: Structural analysis in
evolutionary morphology. Paieobwlogy 7:430442.
Laurens, H. 1914. The reactions of normal and eye-less amphibian larvae to 1ight.J. E q . Zool. 16:195-210.
Lauriia, A., and T Aho. 1997. Do female cornmon fiogs choose
their breeding habitat to avoid predation on tadpoles? Oikos
78:585-591.
Lauriia, A., J. Kujasalo, and E. Ranta. 1997. Ditferent antipredator behavior in two anuran tadpoles: Effects of predator
diet. Behav. Ewl. Socwbwl. 40:329-336.
Lavia, E. 0. 1984a. Larvas de Telmutobius (Anura: Leptodac-
386
LITERATURE CITED
. 1996. The amphibians and reptiies ofthe Yucatn Peninsula. Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publ. Assoc.
Lee, R. K. K., and R. C. Eaton. 1989. Segmental template for
reticulospinal organization. Soc. Neurosci. Abrtr. p. 32.
Lefcort, H. 1996. Adaptive, chemically mediated flight response in tadpoles of the southern leopard frog, Rana utricularia. Copeia 1996:455-459.
. 1998. Chemically mediated fright response in southern
toad (Bufotewescris) tadpoles. Cripeia 1998:45-450.
Lefcort, H., and A. R. Blaustein. 1995. Disease, predator
avoidance, and vulnerability to predation in tadpoles. Oikos
74:469474.
Lefcort, H., and S. M. Eiger. 1993. Antipredatory behaviour of
feverish tadpoles -implication for pathogen transmission.
BehavMur 126:13-27.
Leibovitz, H. E., D. D. Culiey, Jc, and J. P. Geaghan. 1982.
Effects of vitamin C and sodium benzoate on survival,
growth, and skeletal deformities of intensively cultured bulifrog larvae Rana catesbeiana reared at two pH 1evels.J. Worid
Maricult. SOL.13:322-328.
Leips, J., and J. Travis. 1994. Metamorphic responses to changing food levels in two species of hylid frogs. Ecology
75: 1345-1356.
Leloup-Hatey, J., M. Buscaglia, G. Jolivet-Jaudet, and J. Leloup.
1990. Interrenal function during the metamorphosis in anuran Amphibia. pp. 139-154. In Bwlogy andphyswlogy ofamphibians. Prgress in Zoology 38.Pmc. FintIntl. Symp. Bwl. Physwl. Amphibians (Karlsruhe, Federal Republic of Germany),
edited by W Hanke. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer-Verlag.
Lemckert, F. 1996. An observation of aggregation behaviour by
tadpoles of the great barred river frog (Mkophyesfacciolatus).
Herptofauna 26:43-44.
Leon-Ochoa, J., and R. Donoso-Barros. 1970. Desarrollo embrionario y metamorfosis de Pieurohma brachyops (Cope)
(Saliatia-Leptodaaylidae). Bol. Soc. Biol. Concepcion 42:
355-379.
Le Quang Trong, Y. 1973. Stnicture et dveloppement de la
peau et des glandes cutanes de Bufo regularis Reuss. Bull.
SOL.Zool. Fr5nce 98:449485.
. 1974. Etude de la peau et des glandes cutanes de&pus tropicalis Gray. Bull. Inst. France Afique Noire 26:407426.
Lescure, J. 1968. Lc comportement social des batraciens. Rev.
Comport.Anim. 2: 1-33.
. 1976. Etude de deux ttards de Phyllobates (Dendrobatidae): Pfemoralis (Boulenger) et Ppictus (Bibron). Bull. Soc.
Zool. France 101:299-304.
. 1981. Contribution I'tude des amphibiens de Guyane franaise. IX. Le ttard gastromyzophore dXteiupus
~%vescensDumril et Bibron (Anua, Bufonidae).AmphibiaReptilia 2:209-215.
. 1984. Las larvas de dendrobatidae [sic]. (Proc.]II. Reunwn Iberoamer. Cons. Zool. Vert. 37-45.
Leucht, T. 1987. Effects of weak magnetic fields on background
adaptation inXenupuslaevis.Natunuissenschaften74: 192-194.
Levine, R. L. 1980. An autoradiographic study of the retinal
projection in Xenopus laevis with comparisons to Rana. J.
Comp.Neurol. 189:1-29.
Lewinson, D., M. Rosenberg, and M. R. Warburg. 1987. U1trastmctural and ultracytochemical studies of the giii epithelium in the larvae of Salamandrasaiamandra (Amphibia, Urodela). Zoommphoigy 107:17-25.
Lewis, E. R. 1976. Surface morphology of the builfrog amphibian papia. Brain Behav. Evol. 13:196-215.
LITERATURE CITED
Lewis, E. R., and R. E. Lombard. 1988. The arnphibian inner
ear. pp. 93-123. In The evolutwn of the amphibian auitovy system, edited by B. Fritzsch, M. J. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, T. E.
Hetherington, and W Waikowiak. New York: Wiley.
Lewis, S., and C. Straznicky. 1979. The time of origin of the
mesencephalic trigeminai neurons in Xenopus. J. Comp. Neurol. 183:633-646.
Lewis, W M., Jr. 1970. Morphological adaptations of cyprindontoids for inhabiting oxygen deficient waters. Copeia
1970:319-326.
Lewontin, R. C. 1955. The effects of popuiation density and
composition on viability in Drosophila mehnogmter: Evolutwn 9:27-41.
Leydig, F. 1853. Anatomisch-histologische Untersuchungen ubw
Fische und Reptilien. Berlin.
. 1857. Lehrbuch der Histologe des Menschen und der
Thiere. Frankfurt: Meidinger Sohn & Co.
. 1876. Ueber die Allgemeinen Bedeckungen der Amphibien. Arch. Mikros. Anat. 12:119-242.
Li, J. C., and C. S. Lin. 1935. Studies of the "rain frog" Kaiuuh
borealis 11. The food and feeding of the embryos and aduits.
Peking Nat. Hist. Bull. 10:45-53.
Licht, L. E. 1967. Growth inhibition in crowded tadpoles: Intraspecific and interspecific effects. Ecology 48:736-745.
. 1968. Unpalatability and toxicity of toad eggs. Herpetob i c a 24:93-98.
. 1969. Palatability of Rana and H y h eggs. American
Midl. Nat. 88:296-299.
. 1971. Breeding habits and embryonic thermai requirements of the frogs, Rana aurora aurora and Ranapretiosapetwsa, in the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 52: 116-124.
. 1974. Survival of embryos, tadpoles and aduits ofRana
aumra and Ranapretwsa sympatric in southwestern British
Columbia. CanadianJ.Zool. 52:613-627.
Lieberkund, I. 1937. Egkichende Studien uber die Mouphologe
und Histgenese der Larvakn Haftmgane bei den Amphibien.
Copenhagen: C. A. Reitzels Forlag.
Liem, K. F. 1961. On the taxonomic status and the granular
patches of the Javanese frog Rana chalconota Schlegel. Herpetologica 17:69-71.
Liem, K. F., and D. B. Wake. 1985. Morphology: Current approaches and concepts. pp. 366-377. In Functional vertebrate
mmphology, edited by M. Hildebrand, D. M. Brarnble, K. F.
Liem, and D. B. Wake. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Ligname, A. H. 1964. Fixation method for arnphibian eggs. J.
Roy. Micvoscop. Soc. 83:48 1 4 8 2 .
Lillie, R. D. 1965. Histopathologic technic andpracticalhistochem3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hiil.
Liilywhite, H . B. 1970. Behavioral temperature regulation in
the bulifrog, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1970:158-168.
Liilywhite, H. B., P. Licht, and P. Chelgren. 1973. The role of
behavioral thermoregulation in the growth energetics of the
toad, Buf boreas. Ecology 54:375-383.
Limbaugh, B. A., and E. .E' Volpe. 1957. Early development of
the Gulf Coast toad, Bufo valliceps Wiegmann.AmericanMus.
Nutitates (1842) :1-32.
Lindquist, E. D., and T. E. Hetherington. 1998. Tadpoles and
juveniles of the Panamanian golden frog,Ate&us zeteki (Bufonidae), with information on development of coloration
and panerning. Herpetologica 54:370-376.
Ling, R. W, J. P. Van Amberg, and J. K. Werner. 1986. Pond
acidity and its relationship to larval development ofAmbystoma mmuhtum and Rana sylvatica in upper Michigan. J.
Herpetol. 20:230-236.
w.
387
Linss, W., and G. Geyer. 1964. ber die elektronenmikroskopische Struktur der Nierentubui von Rana escuknta. Anat.
Anz. 115:282-296.
Lips, K. R., and J. M. Savage. 1996. Key to the known tadpoles
(Amphibia: Anura) of Costa Rica. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 31: 17-26.
Littlejohn, M. J. 1963. The breeding biology of the Baw Baw
frog Phiiuria f;ostzshSpencer. Proc. Linnean Soc. New South
Wales 88:273-276.
Littlejohn, M. J., and A. A. Martin. 1964. The Crinia l m i
complex (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in south-eastern Australia. Aus~valianJ.Zool. 12:70-83.
. 1965. A new species of Crinia (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from South Australia. Copeia 1965:3 19-324.
Liu, C.-C. 1940. Tadpoles of West China Salieni5a.J. W China
Border Res. Soc. 12:7-62,4 plates.
. 1950. Amphibians of western China. Fieldiana Zool.
Mem. 2:1400, 10 plates.
Liu, C.-C., and S. Q. Hu. 1961. TheAnura of China. Peking:
Science Press.
Liu, H., R. Wassersug, and K. Kawachi. 1996. A computational
fluid dynamics study of tadpole swirnming. J. Exp. Zool.
199:1245- 1260.
. 1997. The three-dimensional hydrodynamics of tadpole 1ocomotion.J. Exp. Bwl. 200:2807-2819.
Lofts, B. 1974. Reproduction. pp. 107-218. In Physwlogy of the
Amphibia, Vol. 2, edited by B. Lofts. New York: Academic
Press.
Lopez, K. 1989. Sex differentiation and early gonadal development in Bombina orientahs (Anura, Discoglossidae).J. Morphol. 199:299-311.
Loschenkohl, A. 1986. Niche partitioning and competition in
tadpoles. pp. 399402. In Stuies in herpetoiugy, edited by Z.
RoEek Prague: Charles University Press.
Lovtrup, S., and A. Pign. 1968. Obse~ationson the giii development in frogs. Ann. Embvyol. Morphol. 2:3-13.
hvtrup, S., and B. Werdinius. 1957. Metabolic phases during
arnphibian embryogenesis.J. Exp. Zool. 135:203-220.
Lowe, D. A. 1986. Organization of lateral line and auditory
areas in the midbrain of Xenopus laevis. J. Comp. Neurol.
245:498-5 13.
. 1987. Single-unit study of lateral line ceiis in the optic
tectum of Xenopw laevis: Evidence for bimodal lateral line/
optic units.J. Comp. Neurol. 257:396404.
Lowe, D. A., and I. J. Russell. 1982. The central projections of
the lateral line and cutaneous sensory fibres (VI1 and X) in
Xenopus laevis. Proc. Roy. SOL.Lonhn 216B:279-297.
Lucas, E. A., and W A. Reynolds. 1967. Temperature selection
by yphibian larvae. Physwl. Zool. 40:159-171.
Luckenbdl, L. M. 1964. Fine structure and development of
horny jaws and teeth of the tadpole (Ranap$iens). Dissertation, Brown University
. 1965. Morphogenesis of the horny jaws ofRanap$iens
larvae. Deve&. Bwl. 11:2549.
Ludwig, D., and L. Rowe. 1990. Life history strategies for energy gain and predator avoidance under time constraints.
American Nat. 135:686-707.
Lum, A. M., R. J. Wassersug, M. J. Potel, and S. A. Lerner.
1982. Schooling behavior of tadpoles: A potential indicator
of ototoxicity. Phamml. Bwchem. Behav. 17:363-366.
Luna, L. G., ed. 1968. Manual of histoiugic staining mthoak of
the Amed Fmces Institute of Pathology. New York: McGrawHill Book.
Luther, A. 1914. ber die vom N. trigeminus versorgte Musku-
388
LITERATURE CITED
w.
LITERATURE CITED
hlaniatis, G. M., and V. M. Ingram. 1971a. Erythropoiesis during amphibian metamorphosis. I. Site of maturation of
enh-ocytes in Rana catesbeiana. J. Cell Bwl. 49: 372-379.
. 1971b. Erythropoiesis during amphibian metamorphosis. 11.Immunochemical study of Iamal and adult hemoglobins in Rana catesbeiana.J. Cell Bwl. 49:380-389.
. 1971c. Erythropoiesis during amphibian metamorphosis. III. Immunochemical detection of tadpole and frog hemoglobins (Rana catesbeiana) in single erythrocytes.J. Cell
Bwl. 49:390404.
hanis, M. L., and D. L. Claussen. 1986. Environmental and
genetic influentes on the thermal physiology of Rana sylaat&.J. T h m .Bwl. 11:31-36.
h-g,
M. J., and G. M. Ai Johari. 1985. Imrnunological
memory and metamorphosis. pp. 420433. In MetammphoN, edited by M. B d s and M. Bownes. Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
>anning, M. J., and J. D. Horton. 1969. Histogenesis of
hmphoid organs in larvae of the South African clawed toad,
X i m p lmvis (Daudin). J. Embvyol. &p. Morphol. 22:265277.
1 9 8 2 . RES structure and function of the Amphibia. pp.
4 2 3 4 0 . In The reticuloendothelial system. A comprehensive
&e,
Vol. 3. Phylogeny and onto~eny,edited by N. Cohen
and M. M. Sigel. New York: Plenum.
Santeifel, Y. 1995. Chemicdy mediated avoidance of predators by Rana temporaria tadpoles.J. Herpetol. 29:461463.
Shteifel, Y., and A. V. Lhushev. 1996. Avoidance of predator
chemical cues by tadpoles of four East European anuran speaes (Bufi bufo, Rana antalis, R. Iessonae, and R. tempmaria).
AdP. Amphib. Res. Fmm. SUaiet Unwn 1:161-180.
Saateufel, G., O. Wess, and W Himstedt. 1977. Messungen
am dioptrischen Apparat von Amphibienaugen und Berechnung der Sehrscharfe im Wasser und L&. Zool. Jahrb.
81:395406.
S b , E. 1930. Zur Entwiddungsgeschichte des Vorderdarmes der Arnphibien. Zool Jahrb. Anat. 52:405486.
hIarcus, H. 1908. Beitrage zur Kemtnis der Gymnophionen.
I. ber das Schlundspaltengebiet. Arch. Mikros. Anat.
E-.-Gesch.
77:695-774.
lLuian, M. P., K. Sampath, A. R. C. Nirrnala, and T. J. Pandian. 1980. Behavioural response of Rana cyanuphylictZr tadpole exposed to changes in dissolved oxygen concentration.
P w l . Behav. 25:35-38.
hluinelli, M., S. Tei, D. Vagnetti, and M. P. Sensi. 1985. SEM
observation on the development and the regression of the
oral disc of Bufi vubaris l k a . Acta ~mbvyolMorphol. &p.
6:31-39.
Siuinelli, M., and D. Vagnetti. 1988. Morphology of the oral
disc of Bufi bufi (Salientia: Bufonidae) tadpoles.J Morphol.
195:71-81.
S l u i q M. E, and R. M. Douglas. 1994. Shape quantization
and the estimation of volume and surface area of reptile eggs.
J. Hqetol. 28:281-291.
bruiier, G. 1973. Limnology of the Congo and Amazon rivers.
pp. 223-238. In Tropicalfirest ewsystems in A j k a and South
L.inrma:A wmparative revim, edited by N. Cohen and
A. M. Sigel. Washington, D. C.: Smithsonian Institution
Press.
h h h a i i , E., and G. C. Grigg. 1980a. Acclimation of CTM,
LD,. and rapid loss of acclimation of thermal preferendum
iu t-adpoles of Limnodynastes peronii (Anura: Myobatrachi&e). Austvalian Zool. 20:447455.
. 1980b. Lack of metabolic acclimation to difierent ther-
389
m.
390
LITERATURE CITED
J d .
fonidae) from the Pacific highlands of Guatemaia and southern Mexico, with comments on the status of Bufo valliqs
macmm'status. Herpetobgicu 53 :14-30.
Menke, M. E., and D. L. Claussen. 1982. Thermai acchation
and hardening in tadpoles of the bullfrog, Rana cutesbeiana.
J. Tberm. Biol. 7:215-219.
Menzies, J. I. 1967. An ecologicai note on the frog Pseudhymenocbirus merlini Chabanaud in Sierra Le0ne.J. WestAfncanSci.
Assoc. 12:23-28.
Menzies, J. I., and R. G. Zweifel. 1974. Systematics of Litoria
arfakiana of New Guinea and sibling species (Salientia, Hylidae).American Mus. Novitates (2558): 1-16.
Merchant-Larios, H . 1978. Ovarian differentiation. pp. 47-81.
In Tbe vertebrate ovay comparativebwlogy and evolution, edited
by R. E. Jones. New York: Plenum.
Merchant-Larios, H., and I. Villalpando. 1981. Ultrastructurai
events during early gonadai development in Ranapipiens and
&nopus laevik.Anat. Rec. 199:349-360.
Mertens, R. 1938. HerpetologischeErgebnisse einer Reise nach
Kamerun. Abb. Senckenberg. Naturf Ges. 443 :1-52.
. 1960. Die Larven der Amphibien und ihre evolutive
Bedeutung. 2001.Anz. 164337-358.
Meseguer, J., A. Garca-Ayaia, and A. Lpez. 1996. Structure
of the amphibian mesonephric tubule during ontogenesis in
Rana ridibunda L. tadpoles: Early ontogenetic stages, renal
corpuscle formation, neck segment, and peritoneal funnels.
Anat. Embryol. 193:397-406.
Meseguer, J., M. T. Lozano, and B. Aguilleiro. 1985. Ultrastructure of the renal granulopoietic tissue of the Rana ridibunda tadpole. J. Submicros. Cytol. 17:391-401.
Metter, D. E. 1964. A morphologicai and ecological comparison of two populations of the tailed frog,Ascapbustnui Stejneger. Copeia 1964:181-195.
. 1967. Variation in the ribbed frog, Ascapbus tnui Stejneger. Copeia 1967:634-649.
Meyer, M., J. Frohlich, and I. Nagel. 1975a. Zur epidermaien
Kugelzelie der Larve von Ascapbus truei Stejneger (Amphibia, Salientia, Ascaphidae): Ein biometrischer Beitrag.
Zeit. Mikros. Anat. Foncb. 89: 1086-1098.
Meyer, M., R. Guderjahn, and J. Frohlich. 1975b. ber Kugelzelien und die Stniktur der larvaien Epidermis von Froschlurchen. I. Ascapbus truei Stejneger. Zeit. Mikros. Anat. Fmsch.
Leipzig 89:79-107.
Michael, M. I., and M. A. Ai Adhami. 1974. The development
of the thyroid glands in anuran amphibians of Iraq. J. 2001.
174:315-323.
Michael, M. I., and A. Y. Yacob. 1974. The development,
growth and degeneration of the pronephric system in anuran
amphibians of Iraq. J. 2001.174:407417.
Michael, S. F. 1997. Captive breeding of Eieutbero~lusantiliensis (Anura: Leptodactylidae)from Puerto Rico with notes
on behavior in captivity. Herpetol. Ra7 28: 141-143.
Michalowski, J. 1966. Studies on the relationship of Bombina
bombina ( L i a e u s ) and Bombina variegata (Limaeus) II.
Some taxonomic characters of tadpoles of both species and
of tadpoles obtained from cross under laboratory conditions.
Acta 2001.Cracov. 11:67-94.
Mijares-Urrutia, A. 1990. The tadpole of Cen~oienellaandina
(Anura: Centrolenidae).J. Herpetol. 24:410-412.
Millamena, O. M., E. J. Aujero, and I. G. Borlongan. 1990.
Techniques for aigae harvesting and preservation for use
in culture and as larvai food. Aquacult. Engineel: 9:295304.
Millard, N. 1942. Abnormalities and variations in the v a s d x
LITERATURE CITED
system of Xenupus h i s (Daudin). Trans.h y . Soc. Smth Af
r i a 29:9-28.
. 1945. The development of the arteriai system of Xenopus b i s , including experiments on the destruction of the
larval aortic arches. Trans. Roy. Soc. South A f i m 30:2 17-234.
. 1949. The development of the venous system of &nopus laepis. Trans.Roy. Soc. South A f i m 32: 55-96.
Miranda, L. A., D. A. Paz, and A. Pisan. 1991. Efecto de Ia
actividad tiroidea en Ia tolerancia al frio de larvas de Bufo
arenarum. Rev.Espana Hep-tol. 6:55-60.
~Miranda,L. A., and A. Pisan. 1993. Efecto de la densidad
poblacionai en larvas de Bufo arenarum producido a traves
de seraies visuaies. Alytes 11:64-76.
~Mishra,l? K., and M. C. Dash. 1984. Larval growth and development of a tree frog, Rhaeophorus mmulatus Gray. T q .
Ecol. 25:203-207.
Mitchell, N., and R. Swain. 1996. Terrestrial development in
the Tasmanian frog, Blyobatrachus nimbus (Anura: Myobatrachidae): Larval development and a field staging table. Pap.
Pmc. Roy. Soc. Tasmania 130:75-80.
Mitchell, S. L. 1983. Spatial distribution of eight species of anuran tadpoles. Thesis, Mississippi State University.
Mitchell, S. L., and R. Altig. 1983. The feeding ecology of Sooooglossusgardzneri.J.Hmpetol. 17:281-282.
Miyamoto, M . M. 1985. Consensus cladograms and general
classifications. Cladistics 1:186-189.
Mobbs, I. G., V. A. King, and R. J. Wassersug. 1988. Prostaglandin E, does not inhibit metamorphosis of tadpole tails
in tissue culture. Exp. Bwl. 47: 151-154.
Mocquard, F. 1890. Recherches sur la faune herpetologique des
Iles de Borno et de Paiawan. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Natl. H&.
Nat. (3):115-168, plates 7-1 1.
Mohanty, S. N., and M. C. Dash. 1986. Effects of diet and aeration on the growth and metamorphosis of Rana t&rina tadpoles. Aqwulture 51:89-96.
Mohanty-Hejmadi, l?, S. K. Dutta, and S. C. Mallick. 1979.
Life history of Indian frogs I1 The marbled baiioon frog Uperodonystoma Schneider.J. Zool. Soc. India 31:65-72.
Mohawaid, A. I?, and S. Hennen. 1971. Ultrastructure of the
germ plasm in eggs and in embryos of Ranapipiens. Dmelop.
B w ~24:37-53.
.
Monayong Ako'o, M. 1981. L'evolution du tube digestif chez
la larve de Phlynodun sandevsoni Parker (Amphibia, Anura,
Phrynobatrachinae).Ann. Fm. Sci. Cameroun 28: 105-1 15.
Montgomery, N. M. 1988. Projections of the vestibular and
cerebellar nuclei in Rana pipiens. Brain Behav. Evol. 31:8295.
Montgomery, N. M., and K. V. Fite. 1989. Retinotopic organization of central optic projections in Ranapipiens.J. Comp.
Neurol. 283526-540.
Montgomery, N. M., K. V. Fite, and A. M. Grigonis. 1985. The
pretectal nucleus ient$omzis mesencephali of Rana pipiens. J.
Comp.Neurol. 234:264-275.
Montgomery, N., K. V. Fite, M. Taylor, and L. Bengston. 1982.
Neural correlates of optokinetic nystagmus in the mesencephaion of Ranapipiens: A functional analysis. Brain Behav.
Evol. 21:137-150.
Mookerjee, H . K. 1931. On the development of the vertebral
column of Anura. Philosoph. Trans. Roy. SOL. LoLondon
219B: 165-196.
Mookerjee, H. K., and S. K. Das. 1939. Further investigation
on the development of the vertebral column in Salientia (Anura).J. Morphol. 64: 167-209.
Moore, J. A. 1949a. Pattems of evolution in the genus Rana.
391
392
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
1997. First data on the experimentai evaluation of predation
on Hetwobranchw longifiliz larvae (Siluroidei; Clariidae) by
toad tadpoles (Buforegularis).Aqumult. Res. 28: 335-339.
Nichols, H. W. 1975. Growth media-freshwater. pp. 7-24. In
Handbook ofphywlogd methods. Culture methods andgrowth
memurements, edited by J. R. Stein. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Nichols, R. J. 1937. Taxonomic studies on the mouth parts of
larval Anura. Illinoiz Bwl. Monogl: 15(4):1-73.
Nie, M., J. D. Crim, and G. R. Ultsch. 1999. Dissolved oxygen,
temperature, and habitat selection by bulifrog (Ranacatesbeiana) tadpoles. Copeia 1999: 153-162.
Nieuwkoop, P. D., and J. Faber. 1956. Normal tables ofxenopus
laevis (Daudin).Amsterdam: North-Hoiiand.
. 1967. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin):A systematical and chronologiml survey of the heiopmentfim thefertilized e
m til1 the end of metamrphosis. 2d ed. Arnsterdam:
North-Holland.
Nieuwkoop, E D., and L. A. Sutasurya. 1976. Embryological
evidence for a possible polyphyletic origin of the recent amphibians. J. Embryol. Ekp. Morphol. 35: 159-167.
Nieuwenhuys, R., and E Opdam. 1976. Structure of the brain
stem. p. 811-855. In Frog neurobwlogy, a handbook, edited by
R. Liins and W. Precht. Beriin: Springer-Verlag.
Nikeryasova, E. N., and V. A. Golichenkov. 1988. Dynamics of
pigment granule distribution in dermal melanophores of
larval anurans. 2. Aggregation. S m & J. Deveiop. Bwl.
19:406412.
Nikundiwe, A. M., and R Nieuwenhuys. 1983. The cell massa
in the brainstem of the South African clawed frog Xenupus
&s: A topographical and topological analysis. J. Comp.
Neurol. 213: 199-219.
Nina, H . L., and E. M. De1 Pino V. 1977. Estructura histologica de1 ovario de1 sapo Eleuthwodmtylus unimkatus y observaciones sobre e1 desarrollo embrionario. Rev. Univ. Catolim
Ecuador 5:3141.
Nishikawa, A., M. Kaiho, and K. Yoshizato. 1989. Cell death
in the anuran tadpole tail: Thyroid hormone induces keratinization and tail-specific growth inhibition of epidermal
cells. Deveiop. Bwl. 131:337-344.
Nishikawa, K., and R. Wassersug. 1988. Morphology of the
caudal spinal cord in Rana (Ranidae) and Xenupus (Pipidae)
tadpoles. J Comp.Neurol. 269: 193-202.
. 1989. Evolution of spinal nerve nurnber in anuran larvae. Brain Behav. Evol. 33: 15-24.
Noble, G. K. 1917. The systematic status of some batrachians
Mus. Nat. H&.
from South America. BuU. Am&n
37:793-814.
. 1925a. An outline of the relation of ontogeny to phylogeny within the Arnphibia, I, 11. AmericanMus. Nuvitates
(165): 1-17, (166):1-10.
. 1925b. The integumentary, pulrnonary and cardiac
modifications correlated with increased cutaneous respiration in the Arnphibia: A solution to the "hairy frog" problem. J Morphol. 40:341416.
. 1926a. The hatching process ofAlytes,E l e u t h e r o ~ l u s
and other amphibians. AmericanMus.Nuvitates (229) :1-7.
. 1926b. The importante of larval characteristics in the
classification of South African Salientia.AmericanMus. Novitates (237):l-10.
. 1927. The value of life history data in the study of the
evolution of the Amphibia. Ann. New Tork Acad. Sci. 30:31128, plate 9.
. 1929. The adaptive modifications of the arboreal tad-
393
394
LITERATURE CITED
Omerza, F. F., and K. E. Aey. 1992. Redeployment of trigeminal motor neurons during metamorphosis. J. Cornp.Neurol.
325:124-134.
Opatrny, E. 1973. Clay ccnests"of toad tadpoles. BritishJ. Herpetol. 4:338-339.
Opdam, l?, M. Kemali, and R. Nieuwenhuys. 1976. Topological analysis of the brain stem of the frogs Rana esculenta and
Rana catesbeiana.J. Cornp. Neurol. 165 :307-3 32.
Orlando, K., and A. W. Pinder. 1995. Larval cardiorespiratory
ontogeny and dometry in Xenupus aevis. Physwl. Zool.
68:63-75.
Orr, P. R. 1955. Heat death. 11. Differential response of entire
animal (Rana pipiens) and several organ systems. Physwl.
Zool. 28:294-302.
Orton, G. L. 1943. The tadpole of Rhinophrynus hrsalis. Oam.
Pap. Mus. Zool., Unis.Michigan (472):1-7, 1 plate.
, 1944. Studies on the systematic and phylogenetic significance of certain larval characters in the Amphibia Salientia. Dissertation, University of Michigan.
1 9 4 6 . The unknown tadpole. TuvtoxNavs 24:131-132.
. 1949. Larval development of Neetophrynoides tomieri
(Roux), with comments on direct development in frogs.
Ann. Camegie Mus. 31:257-276.
. 1952. Key to the genera of tadpoles in the United
States and Canada. Arnerican Midl. Nat. 47:382-395.
. 1953. The systematics of vertebrate larvae. Syst. Zool.
2:63-75.
. 1954. Dirnorphism in larval mouthparts in spadefoot
of the Scaphiopus harnmondi group. Copeia 1954:97-100.
. 1957. The bearing of larval evolution on some problems in frog classification. Syst. Zool. 6:79-86.
Osborne, P. L., and A. J. McLachlan. 1985. The effect of tadpoles on algal growth in temporary, rain-Med rock pools.
Freshw. B d . 15 :77-87.
Ott, M. E., N. Heisler, and G. R Ultsch. 1980. A reevaluation
of the relationship between temperature and the critical oxygen tension in freshwater fishes. Cornp. Bwchern. Physiol.
67A:337-340.
Ottoson, D. 1976. Morphology and physiology of muscle spindles. pp. 643-675. In Frogneurobwlogy, a handbook, edited by
R. Llins and W Precht. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Ovalle, W. K. 1979. Neurite complexes with Merkel ceiis in larval tentacles ofXenqpus b v t s . Cell Tiss.Res. 204:233-341.
Ovaska, K. 1991. Reproductive phenology, popdation structure, and habitat use of the frog Eleuthemda@us johnstonei
in Barbados, West 1ndies.J. Herpetol. 25:424430.
Overton, J . 1959. Studies on the mode of outgrowth of the
amphibian pronephric duct. J. Ernbryol. -Exp. Morphol.
7:86-93.
Oxner, W. M., J. Quinn, and M. E. DeMont. 1993. A mathematical model of body kinematics in swimming tadpoles.
CanadianJ.Zool. 71 :407-413.
Padhye, A. D., and H. V Ghate. 1988. Effect of altered p H on
embryos and tadpoles of the frog Microhyh m a t a . Herpetol.
J. 1:276-279.
Paicheler, J.-C., F. De Broin, J. Gaudant, C. Mourer-Chauvire,
J.-C. Rage, and C. Vergnaud-Grazzini. 1978. Le bassin lacustre Miocne de Bes-Konak (Anatolie-Turquie): Gologie
et introduction Ia palontologie des vertbrs. Gobws
(11):43-65.
Pancharama, M., and S. K. Saidapur. 1985. Ovarian cycle in the
frog Rana cyanuphlyctis: A quantitative study of foilicdar kinetics in relation to body mass, oviduct, and fat body cycles.
J.Morphol. 186:135-147.
LITERATURE CITED
Pandian, T. J., and M. P. Marian. 1985a. Predicting anuran
metamorphosis and energetics. Physwl. ,2201. 58:538-552.
. 1985b. Time and energy costs of metamorphosis in the
Indian buirog Rana tgrina. Copeia 1985:653-662.
. 1985c. Physiological correlates of surfacing behaviour- effect of aquarium depth on surfacing, growth, and
metamorphosis in Rana tgrina. Physwl. Behav. 35:867-872.
Papernal, I., and R. Lainson. 1995.Allogu~eabufinis nov. gen.,
nov. sp. (Microsporea: Glugeidae), a microsporidian ofBufo
marinus tadpoles and metamorphosing toads (Amphibia:
.bura) from Amazonian Brasil. Dzi Aguat. Org. 23:7-11.
PLnchy, D. M., and R. H. Kaplan. 1992a. Developmental consequences of tail injury on larvae of the Oriental fire-beilied
toad, Bombina mientalis. Copeia 1992:129-137.
. 1992b. Maternal effects on offspring growth and development depend on environmental quality in the frog Bombina mientaltj. Oecologia 91: 579-586.
. 1995. Maternal investment and developmental plasticity: Functional consequences for locomotor performance of
hatchling frog larvae. Funct. Ecol. 9:606-6 11.
F'arker, G. E. 1967. The iduence of temperature and thyroxine
on oxygen consumption in Rana pipiens tadpoles. Copeia
1967:610-616.
F'arker, H. W. 1934. A manograph of the Microhylidae. London:
Jarrold and Sons, London (67 figs).
. 1936. A coilection of reptiles and amphibians from the
mountains of British New Guinea.Ann. MaJ. Nat. Hist. Ser.
10. 17:66-93.
Parker, W. K. 1871. On the structure and development of the
s k d of the common frog (Rana tempmaha L.). Philosoph.
Tmm. Roy. Soc. London 161B:137-2 11.
. 1876. On the stmcture and development of the skull
in the Batrachia. Part 11. P m . Zool. Soc. London 1876:601669.
. 1881. On the structure and development of the skull in
the Batrachia. Part 111. Philosoph. Trans. Roy. Soc. London
172: 1-266.
Purridge, B. L. 1982. The structure and tiinction of fish
schools. Sci. Amehmn 246: 114-123.
Purridge, B. L., and T. J. Pitcher. 1980. The sensory basis of
fish schools: Relative roles of lateral line and visi0n.J Comp.
P w l . 135A:315-325.
Paterson, N. F. 1939a. The head of Xenopus l m i . Qwrt.J.
X ~ SSci.. 81:161-234.
. 1939b. The olfactory organ and tentades of Xelzc~pus
InepLs. South A f i a n J . Sci. 36: 390404.
Parrerson, J. W., and A. J. McLachlan. 1989. Larval habitat duration and size at metamorphosis in frogs. Hydrobwlogia
171:121-126.
Parrin,M. J., ed. 1956. Ovid's Metamwphoses. 2d ed. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.
Pa\ignano, I. 1989. Method employed to study the diet of anuran amphibians Iarvae. Amphibia-Reptilia 10:453-456.
. 1990. Niche overlap in tadpole populations of Pelobates
f i a s insubricus and Hyla arbmea at a pond in northwestern
Iraly. Boll. Zool. 57: 83-87.
Peacor, S. D., and E. E. Werner. 1997. Trait-mediated indirect
interactions in a simple aquatic food web. Ecology 78: 11461156.
Pearman, P. B. 1995. Effects of pond size and consequent predatory density on two species of tadpoles. Oewloga 102:1-8.
h a n , P. B., and H. M. Wilbur. 1990. Changes in population dynamics resulting from oviposition in a subdivided
habitat. A&an
Nat. 135:708-723.
395
396
LITERATURE CITED
Piiper, J. 1982. Respiratory gas exchange at lungs, gi, and tissues: Mechanisms and adjustments.J. Exp. Bwl. 100:5-22.
Piiper, J., and P. Scheid. 1977. Comparative physiology of respiration: Functional analysis of gas exchange organs in vertebrates. pp. 219-253. In Intl. Rev. Physwl., Reqil: Physiol. 11,
Vol. 14, edited by J. G. Widdicombe. Baltimore: University
Park Press.
Piai, R S. 1978. On NyctibatraEhus major Boul. (Ranidae)
with a descnption of its tadpole. Bull. Zool. Suw. India
1:135-140.
Piiai, R. S., and G. M. Yazdani. 1973. Bufmdes, a new genus
for the rock-toad,Ansonia meghaiuyana Yazdani and Chanda,
with notes on its ecology and breeding habits. J. Zool. Soc.
India 25:65-70.
Pinder, A. W., and W W. Burggren. 1983. Respiration during
chronic hypoxia and hyperoxia in larvai and adult bulifrogs
(Rana catesbeiana).J.Exp. Bwl. 105:205-213.
Pinder, A. W., and M. E. Feder. 1990. Effect of boundary layers
on cutaneous gas exchange.J. Exp. Bwl. 143:67-80.
Pinder, A. W., B. Pelster, and R G. Boutilier. 1990. Regulation
of blood flow in isolated amphibian skin. Amezcan Zool.
30:136 (Abstr.).
Pinder, A. W, K. B. Storey, and G. R. Ultsch. 1992. Estivation
and hibemation. pp. 250-274. In Environmentdphysiology of
the amphibians, edited by M. E. Feder and W. W. Burggren.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pintar, T. 1987. Zur Kenntnis des Tomatenfrosches Dyscophw
antongili (Grandidier 1877)(Anura: Microhylidae). Salamandra 23: 106-121.
Pitcher, T. J. 1986. The behavior of teleostfishes. Baitimore: John
Hopkins University Press.
Plasota, K. 1974. The development of the chondrocranium
(neurocranium and the mandibular and hyoid arches) in
Rana temporaria L. and Pelobatesfiscus (Laur.).Zool. Poloniae
24:99-168.
Plassman, W. 1980. Central neuronai pathways in the lateral
line system ofXenopus&S.
J. J m p . Physwl. 136:203-213.
Plytycz, B., and J. Bigaj. 1983. Amphibian lymphoid organs: A
review. Folia Bwl. (Krakw) 3 1:225-240.
Plytycz, B., J. Dulak, and A. Pecio. 1984. Genetic control of
length of larvai period in Rana temporaria. Folia Bwl. (Krah)32:155-166.
Plytycz, B., and M. Klimek. 1992. Effects of diet on transplantation immunity of tadpoles of the European cornmon frog,
Rana temporaria.J. Nu& Immunol. 1:19-30.
Poinar, G. O., Jr. 1988. Infeaion of frog tadpoles (Amphibia)
with insect parasitic nematodes. Expmientia 44528-53 1.
Polis, G. A. 1984. Age structure component of niche width and
intraspecific resource partitioning: Can age groups funaion
as ecological species?American Nat. 123541-564.
. 1988. Exploitation cornpetition and the evolution of
interferente, cannibalism, and intraguild predation in age/
size-structured populations. pp. 185-202. In S i m - ~ u r e d
populatwns: Ecology and evolution, edited by B. Ebenmann and
L. Persson. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Polis. G. A.. and C. A. Mvers. 1985. A survev of intras~ecific
piedatio; among rephes and amphibik. J. ~&petol.
19:99-107.
Poole, T. J., and M. S. Steinberg. 1977. SEM-aided analysis of
morphogenetic movements: Development of the amphibian
pronephric duct. pp. 43-52. In Scanning electron micro~copyl
1977. Vol. 2, edited by O. Johari. Chicago: ITT Res.
Inst.
Pope, C. H. 1931. Notes on the amphibians from Fukein, Hai-
LITERATURE CITED
nan, and other parts of China. Bull. Amrican Mus. Nat.
H&. 61:397-611.
. 1940. China's animalfruntim New York: V i g .
Porges, R., L. A. Van Den Berg, and D. G. Banger. 1986. Reassessing an old problem - acid mine drainage. Pmc. A d can Soc. Civil E n g ~(San. Engr. Div.) 92(SA-1)369-83.
Poska-Teiss, L. 1930. ber die larvale Amphibienepidermis.
Zeit. Zellforsch. Mikms. Anat. 11:445483.
Postek, M. T., K. Howard, A. H. Johnson, and K. L. McMichael. 1980. Scanning electron microscopy:A student's handbook.
Buriington, VT: Ladd Res. Ind., Inc.
Potel, M. J., and R. J. Wassersug. 1981. Computer tools for the
analysis of schoohg. Envimn. Bwl. Fkh. 6: 15-19.
Potter, H. D. 1965. Mesencephalic auditory region of the b d frog. J. Neurophyswl. 28: 1132-1 154.
Potthoff, T. L., and J. D. Lynch. 1986. Interpopuiation variability in mouthparts in Scaphiupus bombzj+ons in Nebraska (Amphibia: Pelobatidae). Prairie Nat. 18:15-22.
Pough, F. H., and S. Kamel. 1984. Post-metamorphic change
in activity metaboiism of anurans in relation to Me history.
Oewloga 65:138-144.
Pouyet, J. C., and A. Beaumont. 1975. Ultrastructure du pancras larvaire d'un Amphibien Anoure, Alpes obrtetricans L.
en culture organotypique. C.R. Soc. Bwl. Paris 169:846-850.
Powell, G. V. N. 1974. Experimental analysis of the social value
of Aocking by stariings (Stumus aubans) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim. Behav. 22: 501-1505.
Poweii, T. L., and J. J. Just. 1985. Development of the urinary
bladder in Rana catesbiana [sic] tadpoles. A m ' c a n 2001.
25:99. (Abstc)
. 1987. Ultrastructure and function of the developing
urinary bladder in Rana catesbeiana. American Zool. 27: 3.
(Abstr.)
Power, J. H. 1927a. Some tadpoles from Griqualand West.
Trans.Roy. Soc. South Ajbca 14:249-25 1, 14 plates.
. 1927b. On the herpetological fama of the LobatsiLinokana area. Trans Roy. Soc. Smth AfriEa 14:405422.
Power, J. H., and W Rose. 1929. Notes on the habits and Mehistories of some Cape Peninsula Anura. Trans. Roy. Soc.
SouthAfTcca 17:109-115.
Prakash, R. 1954. The heart and its conducting system in the
tadpoles of the frog, Rana tgrina Daudin. Pmc. Zool. Soc.
Caicutta 7:28-36.
Prasadmurthy, Y. S., and S. K. Saidapur. 1987. Role of fat bodies in oocyte growth and recruitrnent in the frog Rana cyanophlyctis Schn.J. Exp. Zml. 243: 153-162.
Precht, W 1976. Physiology of the peripheral and central vestibular systems. pp. 481-512. In F r g neurobwlogy, a handbook, edited by R. Llins and W Precht. Beriin: SpringerVerlag.
Prestige, M. C. 1967. The control of ceii number in the lumbar
ventral horns during the development of Xenupw Ia&> tadp01es.J. Embryol. Exp. Mmphol. 18:359-387.
. 1973. Gradients in time of origin of tadpole motoneurons. Brain h.
59:400404.
Preston, F. W 1968. The shape of bird eggs: Mathematical aspects. Auk 85:454463.
Pretty, R., T. Naitoh, and R. J. Wassersug. 1995. Metamorphic
shortening of the alirnentary tract in anuran larvae (Rana
catesbeiana).Anat. Rec. 242:4 17423.
Price, G. C. 1897. Development of the excretory organs of a
myxinoid Bdellortoma stouti Lockington. Zool. Jahrb. Abh.
Anat. Ontog. Time. 10:205-226.
Prigioni, C. M., and D. Arrieta. 1992. Descripcion de Ia larva
397
de Melaophynkcus sanmartini Klappenbach, 1968 (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae). Bol. Soc. Zool. Uwguay 7157-58.
Prigioni, C. M., and J. A. Langone. 1990. Descripcion de Ia
larva de Melanophryniscus mejasmirandai Prigioni & Langone, 1986 (Amphibia, Anura, Bufonidae). Comun. 2001.
Mus. H&. Nat. Monteadeo 12:1-9.
Pronych, S., and R. Wassersug. 1994. Lung use and development in Xenopus W s tadpoles. Canadian J. Zool.
72:738-743.
Prosser, C. L. 1973. Comparativeanimalphyswlogy.Philadelphia:
W. B. Saunders.
Prosser, C. L., and F. A. Brown, Jr. 1961. Comparative animal
pbsology. 2d ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
Pgener, L. A., and A. M. Magiia. 1997. Osteology and skeletal
development of Discoglossus sardus (Anura: Discoglossidae).
J. Mmphol. 233:267-286.
Puiiiam, H. R. 1973. On the advantages of Aocking. J. Thew
Bwl. 38:419422.
Puiiiam, H. R., and T. Caraco. 1984. Living in groups: 1s there
an optimal group size? pp. 122-147. In Behavhural ecology:
An evolutionay apoach, edited by J. R. Krebs and N. B.
Davis. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc.
Punzo, F. 1976. The effects of early experiente on habitat selection in tadpoles of the Malayan painted frog, Kaloulapulchra
(Anura: Microhylidae). J. Bornbay Nat. H&. Soc. 73:270277.
. 1991. Group learning in tadpoles of Rana heckrcheri
(Anua: Ranidae).J. Herpetol. 25 :214-217.
Pusey, H. K. 1938. Structural changes in the anuran mandibular arch during metamorphosis, with referente to Rana temp m a k . Quart.J.Micms. Sci. 80:479-552.
. 1943. On the head of the iiopelmid frog,Rrcaphm t s e i .
I. The chondrocraniurn, jaws, arches, and muscles of a
partly-grown larva. Quart.J.Micros. Sci. 84: 105-185.
Pyburn, W F. 1967. Breeding and larval development of the
hyiid frog Phynohyas spilmnma in southern Veracniz, Mexico. He'petohgica 23 :184-1 94.
. 1975. A new species of microhylid frog of the genus
Synapturanw from southeastern Colombia. Herpetologica
31:439-443.
. 1980. An unusual anuran larvae from the Vaups region of southeastern Colombia. Pap. Aaul. Zool. 33:23 1238.
Pyles, R. A. 1987. Morphology and rnechanics of the jaws of
anuran amphibians. Dissertation, University of Kansas.
Quaiis, C. l?, and R. Shine. 1995. Maternal body-volume as a
constraint on reproductive output in lizards: Evidence from
the evolution of viviparity. Oecologa 103:73-78.
. 1996. Reconstructing ancestral reaction norms: An example using the evolution of reptilian viviparity. Funct. Ecol.
10:688-692.
Quinn, D., and W Burggren. 1983. Laaate production, tissue
distribution, and elimination foiiowing exhaustive exercise
in larval and aduit bullfrogs Rana catesbeiana. Physiol. Zool.
56:597-613.
Rabb, G. B., and M. S. Rabb. 1960. On the mating and egglaying behavior of the Surinam toad, Pipa pipa. Copeia
1960:271-276.
Race, J., Jr., C. Robinson, and R. J. Terry. 1966. The influente
of thyroxine on the normal development of the pancreas in
Ranaptpkns 1arvae.J.Exp. 2001.162:181-192.
Rada de Martinez, D. 1990. Contribucion a1 conocirniento de
Ia larvas de anfibios de Venezuela. Mem. Soc. Cknc. Nat. La
Salle 49/50:391403.
398
LITERATURE CITED
Radakov, D. V. 1973. Schooling in the ecology offih. Israel Programmefor Sctentzfic Transhtwns. New York: Wiley.
R d , R. A. 1987. Constraint, flexibility, and phylogenetic history in the evolution of direct development in sea urchins.
Deveup. Bwl. 119:6-19.
Raff, R. A., J. A. Amstrom, J. E. Chin, K. G. Field, M. T. Ghiselin, D. J. Lane, G. J. Olsen, N. R. Pace, A. L. Parks, and
E. C. R d . 1987. Molecular and developmentai correlates of
macroevolution. pp. 109-138. In Development as an evolutwnaryprocess.IMBL Lect. Bwl. 8. New York: Alan R. Liss.
Raff, R. A., and T. C. Kaufmann. 1983. Embryos,denes, and evolutwn. The deveupmental-genetic basis of evolutzonary change.
New York: M a c d a n .
Raines, D. E., S. E. Korten, and A. G. Hd. 1993. Anesthetic
cutoff in cycloaikanemethanols: A test of current theories.
Anestheswlogy 78 :918-927.
Ramaswami, L. S. 1938. Connections of the pterygoquadrate
in the tadpoles of Phtlautus vanabilts (Anura). Nature
192:577.
. 1940. Some aspects of the chondrocranium of the
South Indian frogs.J. Mysore Univ. 1:15-41.
. 1941. Some aspects of the head of Xenupus M s . Proc.
Indian Sci. Congr 28:183-184.
. 1943. An account of the chondrocranium of Rana af
ghana and Mgophrys, with a description of the masticatory
musculature of some tadpoles. Pmc. Natl. Inst. Sci. Indza
9:43-58.
. 1944. The chondrocranium of two torrent-dwelling
anuran tadpoles. J.Morphol. 74:347-374.
Rao, C. R. N. 1923. Notes on Batrachia. Rec. Indian Mus.
28:439447.
Rappaport, R., Jr. 1955. The initiation of pronephric function
in Ranapipiens.J. Exp. 2001.128:481-487.
Rastogi, R. K., L. Iela, M. Di Meglio, L. Di Matteo, S. Minucci, and I. Izzo-Vitiello. 1983. Initiation and kinetic proiles of spermatogenesis in the frog, Rana esculenta (Amphibia).J. Zool. 201:515-525.
Rathke, H . 1832.Anatomisch-phiiusophZrche Untersuchungenuber
den Kiemenapparat und d Zungenbein der Wirbeltiere. Riga
Dorpat, E. Frantzens Buchhaundlung.
Ratiba, R., C. Girard, and J.-D. Gipouloux. 1981. Mise en evidente de catcholamines dans Ia corde dorsaie de embryons
d'an~phibiens anoures. Relations possibles aves l'activit
adnylate-cyclasiquede cet organe et la migration de ceilules
germinales primordiales. Arch. Anat. Micms. Molphol. Exp.
70: 149-160.
Rau, R. E. 1978. The development of Xenopusgzlli Rose &
Hewitt. Ann. South Ajkcan Mw. 76:247-263.
Rauthner, M. 1967. Pharynx and epitheliaie Organe der Pharynxwand. 1.Kiemen der Anamnier-Kiemendarmderivateder
Cyclostomen und Fische. pp. 21 1-278. In Handbuch der verglezchenden Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. Band 3, edited by L.
Bolk, E. Goppert, E. Kallius, and W. Lubosch. Amsterdam:
Asher.
Rautio, S. A., E. A. Bura, K. A. Berven, and G. J. Gamboa.
1991. Kin recognition in wood frog tadpoles (Rana ylvatica)-factors affecting spatiai proximity to siblings. CanadianJ. Zool. 69:2569-2571.
Razarihelisoa, M. 1969. Observations sur ies Batraciens aquatiques du centre des hauts plateaux de Madagascar. Verh.Intl.
Vrein.Limnol. 17:949-955.
. 1973a. Contribution a l'tude des Batraciens de Madagascar. Ecologie et dveloppement larvaire de Gephyromantis
rnethueni, Angel, Batracien biotope vgtai sur les Pandunus. Bull. Acad. Mabache 5 1:113-128.
. 1973b. Contribution a I'tude des Batraciens de Madagascar. Ecologie et dveloppement larvaire de Mantidactylus
brevipalmatus Ahl., Batracien de eaux courantes. Bull. Acad.
Malgache 51:113-128.
. 1979. Contribution l'tude biologique de quelgues
Batraciens de Madagascar. Dissertation, University of Paris.
Read, A. W. 1994. Treaunent of redleg in tadpoles of Pleurodeles. British Herpetol. Soc. Bu11. (49) :7.
Readiig, C. J. 1990. Paimate newt predation on common frog,
Rana temporaria, and common toad, Bufo bufo, tadpoles.
Helpeto1.J. 1:462-465.
Redshaw, M. R. 1972. The hormonai control of the amphibian
ovary. American Zool. 12:289-306.
Redshaw, M. R., and T. J. Nichoh. 1971. Oestrogen biosynthesis by ovarian tissue of the South African clawed toad,
Xenupus laevii Daudin. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 16:85-96.
Reed, S. C., and H. P. Stanley. 1972. Fine structure of spermatogenesis in the South African clawed toad Xe+s
laevii
Daudin.J. Ultrastruct.Res. 41 :277-295.
Regos, J., and A. Schluter. 1984. Erste Ergebnisse zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie von Lithodytes lineatus (Schneider 1799).
Sahmandra 20:252-261.
Reh, T. A., E. C. Pitts, and M. Constantine-Paton. 1983. The
organization of the fibers in the optic nerve of normal and
tectum-less Rana pipiens. J. Comp.Neuml. 218:282-296.
Reiliy, S. M., and G. V. Lauder. 1990. Metamorphosis of craniai
design in tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tgnnum): A morphometric anaiysis of ontogenetic change. J. Morphol.
204:121-137.
Reinbach, W. 1939. Untersuchungen uber die Entwicklung des
Kopfskeletts von Calyptocephalusgayi (mit einem Anhand
uber das Os supratemporale der anuren Arnphibien). Zeit.
Natumirs. (Jena)72:211-362.
Reiss, J. 0. 1997. Early development of chondrocranium in
the tailed frog Rrcaphus truei (Amphibia: Anura): Implications for anuran paiatoquadrate homologies. J. Morphol.
231:63-100.
Rengel, D., and A. Pisan. 1981. I1 diierenziamento sessuaie
della gonade di Phylhdusa sauvagii. Rend. Accad. Sci. Fis.
Mat. 48:329-335.
Reques, R., and M. Tejedo. 1995. Negative correlation between
length of larvai period and metanlorphic size in natural populations of natterjack toads (Bufo calamita). J. Hevpetol.
29:311-3 14.
Resetarits, W. J., Jr. 1998. Differential vulnerability of Hyla
chrysoscelis eggs and hatchlings to larvai insect predation. J.
Herpetol. 32:440443.
Resetarits, W. J., Jr., and H. M. Wilbur. 1989. Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelir: Role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70:220-228.
Retallick, R. W., and J.-M. Hero. 1998. The tadpoles of Taudactylus eungellensisand ?: liemi and a key to the stream-dwelling
tdpoles of the Eungella Rainforest in east-central Queensland, Austraiia.J. Helpetol. 32:304-309.
Reynolds, W. W., and M. E. Casterlin. 1979. Behaviorai thermoregulation and the "final preferendum" paradigm. AmencanZool. 19:211-224.
Rhodii, J. A. G., and A. Lametschwandmer. 1993. Circulatory
pattern and structure in the tail and tail fins of Xenopus laevii
tadpoles.J. Submimos. Cytol. Pathol. 25 :297-3 18.
Rice, T. M., S. E. Waiker, B. J. Blackstone, and D. H. Taylor.
LITERATURE CITED
1998. A new method for marking individual anuran larvae.
Herpetol. Rev. 29:92-93.
Richards, C. M. 1958. The inhibition of growth in crowded
Ranupipiens tadpoles. Physiol. 2001.31: 138-15 1.
Richards, S. J. 1992. The tadpole of the Austraiian frog Litmia
nyakalensis (Anura, Hylidae), and a key to the torrent tadpoles of northern Queensland.Alpes 10:99-103.
Richards, S. J., and C. M. B d . 1990a. Nonvisual detection of
anuran tadpoles by odonate larvae.J.Herpetol. 24: 311-3 13.
. 1990b. Size-limitedpredation on tadpoles of three Australian frogs. Copeia 1990:1041-1 046.
Richmond, J. E. 1968. Changes in semm proteins during the
development of bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) from tadpoles.
Comp. Bwchem. Physiol. 24:991-996.
Richmond, N. D. 1947. Life history of Scaphwpus holbrookii holbrookii (Harlan). Part I: Larval development and behavior.
Ecology 28:53-67.
Richter, S. 1989. The amphibian pronephros in interaction with
the arterial and venous system during ontogenesis. pp. 8892. In Trenak in vertebrate mmphology.Progress in Zoology. Vol.
35, edited by H . Splechtna and H. Hilgers. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer-Verlag.
. 1992. Ontogenese des Exkretionssystems bei Rana esculenta (Ranidae,Anura). Histo- und morphogenetische Analyse der Anurenniere. Dissertation, University of Wien.
. 1995. The opisthonephros of Rana esculenta (Anura).
I. Nephron development.J. Morphol. 226: 173-187.
Richter, S., and H. Splechtna. 1990. Morphogenesis of the
Malphighian corpuscle in the anuran opisthonephros (Rana
esculenta). p. 469. In Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschafl, 83. Jahresvenammlung 1990, Frankfite am
Main, edited by H . D. Pfannenstiel. Stuttgart: Gustav
Fischer-Verlag.
Ridewood, W. G. 1897a. On the stniaure and development of
the hyobranchial skeleton and larynx in Xempus and Pipa;
with remarks on the aKnities of the Aglossa. J. Linnean Soc.
London 26:53-128.
. 1897b. On the structure and development of the hyobranchial skeleton of the parsley-frog (Pelodytespunctatus).
Soc. London 1897:577-595.
Proc. 2001.
. 1898a. On the development of the hyobranchial skeleton of the midwife-toad (Alytesobste~rt'cans).Proc. 2001.
Soc.
London 1898:4-12.
. 1898b. On the larval hyobranchial skeleton of the anurous batrachians with special referente to the axial parts.J.
Linnean Soc. London 26:474-487.
Rieger, R. M. 1994. The biphasic life cycle- a central theme of
metazoan evolution.American Zool. 34:484491.
Riggs, A. 1951.The metatnorphosisof hemoglobin in the buiifr0g.J. Gen. Physwl. 35:2340.
Riis, N. 1991. A field study of survival, growth, biomass, and
temperature dependence of Rana dulmatinu and Rana tempmaria larvae.Amphibia-Reptilia 12:229-243.
Rist, L., R. D. Semlitsch, H. Hotz, and H. U. Reyer. 1997.
Feeding behaviour, food consumption, and growth efficiency of hemiclonal and parental tadpoles of the Rana esculenta complex. Funct. Ecol. 11:735-742.
Ritke, M. E., and R. L. Mumme. 1993. Choice of calling sites
and oviposition sites by gray treefrogs (Hyla chysoscelis)- a
cornrnent. Ecology 74:623-626.
Rivero, J. A. 1976 (1978). Notas sobre 10s anfibios de Venezuela. 11. Sobre 10s Colostethus de Los Andes venezolanos.
Mem. Soc. Cien.Nat. Lu Salle 35 :327-344.
399
Roberts, A. 1976. Neuronal growth cones in an amphibian embryo. Brain Res. 118:526-530.
Roberts, A., and S. T. Aiford. 1986. Descending projections
and excitation during fictive swimming in X e q u s embryos:
Neuroanatomy and lesion expenments. J. Comp. Neurol.
250:253-261.
Roberts, A., and J. D. W Clarke. 1982. The neuroanatomy of
an amphibian embryo spinal cord. Philosoph. Trans. Roy. Soc.
London 296B:195-212.
Roberts, A., and B. P. Hayes. 1977. The anatomy and function
of the free nerve endings in an amphibian skin sensory system. Proc. Roy. Soc. London 196B:415429.
Roberts, A., and D. T. Patton. 1985. Growth cones and the formation of central and peripheral neurites by sensory neurones in amphibian embryos.J. Neurosci. Res. 13:23-28.
Roberts, A., S. R. Soffe, J. D. W. Clarke, and N. Dale. 1984.
Initiation and control of swimming in amphibian embryos.
pp. 261-284. In Neural onkin ofrhythmic muvements. SEB
Symp. (37).New York: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, A., and J. S. H. Taylor. 1983. A snidy of the growth
cones of developing embryonic sensory neurites.J. Embyol.
Exp. Morphol. 75:3147.
Roberts, J. D. 1981. Terrestrial breeding in the Austraiian leptodactylid frog Myobatrachusgouldii (Gray).Australian Wildl.
Res. 8:451462.
. 1984. Terrestrial egg deposition and direct development in Aremphlyne rotunda Tyler: A myobatrachid frog
from coastal sand dunes at Shark Bay, Western Austraiia.
Australia Wildl.Res. 11:191-200.
Roberts, J. D., P. Honvitz, G. Wardell-Johnson, L. R. Maxson,
and M. J. Mahony. 1997. Taxonomy, relationships, and conservation of a new genus and species of myobatrachid frog
from the high rainfaii region of southwestern Austraiia. Copeia 1997:373-381.
Robinson, D.C. 1961. The identie of the tadpole of Anutheca
coronata. Copeia 1961:495.
Rocek, Z. 1981 (1980). Cranial anatomy of frogs of the family
Pelobatidae Stannius, 1856, with outlines of their phylogeny
and systematics. Acta Univ. Carolinae B d . 1980: 1-164.
. 1989. Developmental patterns of the ethmoidal region
of the anuran skull. pp. 412420. In Trenak in vertebrate m r phology, edited by H. Splechma and H. Helgers. Stuttgart:
Gustav Fischer-Verlag.
. 1990. Ethmoidal endocranial structures in primitive
tetrapods: Their bearing on the search for anuran ancestry.
Zool.J. Linnean Soc. 99: 389407.
Rocek, Z., and LM.Veself. 1989. Development of the ethmoidal
structures of the endocranium in the anuran Pipa pipa. J.
Morphol. 200:300-319.
Rodel, M.-O. 1996. Amphibkn der westafnkanischen Savanne.
Frankfurt: Edition Chimaira.
. 1998. A reproductive mode so far unknown in African
ranids: Phlynobatrahusguineensis Guib & Lamotte, 1961
breeds in tree holes (Anura: Ranidae). Hqetozoa 11: 19-26.
Rodel, M.-O., and K. E. Linsenmair. 1997. Predator-induced
swarms in the tadpoles of an African savanna frog, Phynomantis microps. Ethology 103:902-914.
Root, R. B. 1967. The niche exploitation pattern of the Bluegray Gnatcatcher. Ecol. Monog~37:3 17-350.
Rosel von Rosenhof, A. J. 1753-1758. Histma naturalis Ranurum nustratium. Niirenberg.
Rose, M. J. 1982. Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation. Heredity 48:63-78.
400
LITERATURE CITED
Rose, S. M. 1959. Failure of survival of slowly growing members of a population. Science 129:1026.
. 1960. A feedback mechanism of growth control in tadpoles. Ecology 41: 188-199.
Rosen, D. E., P. L. Forey, B. G. Gardiner, and C. Patterson.
1981. Lungfishes, tetrapods, paieontology, and plesiomorphology. Bull.AmevKan Mw. Nat. Hist. 167:163-275.
Rosenberg, E. A., and B. A. Pierce. 1995. Effect of initiai mass
on growth and mortality at low pH in tadpoles of PseudanW
chrkii and Bufo valliceps.J. Herpetol. 29: 181-185.
Rosenthal, B. M., and W L. R. Cruce. 1985. The dendritic extent of motoneurons in frog brachiai spinai cord: A computer reconstruction of HRP-iiied ceh. Brain Behav. Evol.
27: 106-114.
Rossi, A. 1959. Tavole cronologiche deiio sviluppo embrionale
e larvai de1BufO bufo (L.). Monit. Zwl. Italiano 66: 1-11.
Rostand, J. 1934. Toadr and toa life. Translated by J. Fletcher.
London: Methuen.
Roth, A. H., and J. F. Jackson. 1987. The effect of pool size on
recruiunent of predatory insects and on mortality in a larvai
anuran. Herpetologica 43:224-232.
Roth, G. 1987. Visual behavior in sahmanders. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
Rouf, M. A. 1969. Hematology of the leopard frog, Ranapipiem. Copeia 1969:682-687.
Roux, W 1888. Conmbutions to the developmental mechanisms of the embryo. On the artificial production of halfembryos by destruction of one of the first two blastomeres,
and the later development (postgeneration of the missing
half of the body). Vimhows Arch. Path. Anat. Physwl. Klin.
Med. 114:113-153. [English translation in B. H. Willier and
J. M. Oppenheimer. 1974. Foundatwns ofexpm'wntal embryology. 2d ed. New York: Hafner Press.]
Rovira, J., A. C. Viaro, and M. E. Bodegas. 1993. Structural
study of the fiog Rana temporaria larvai stomach. Tiss. Cell
25:695-707.
Rowe, C. L., and W A. Dunson. 1995. Impacts of hydroperiod
on growth and survivai of larvai amphibians in temporary
ponds of central Pennsylvania. Oecologia 102:397403.
Rowe, C. L., O. M. Kinney, A. P. Fiori, and J. D. Congdon.
1996. Oral deforrnities in tadpoles (Ranacatesbeiana) associated with coai ash deposition: Effects of grazing ability and
growth. Freshw. Bwl. 36:723-730.
. 1998a. Oral deformities in tadpoles of the bulifrog
(Rana catesbeiana) caused by conditions in a poluted habitat. Cupeia 1998:244-246.
Rowe, C. L., O. M. Kinney, R. D. Nagle, and J. D. Congdon.
1998b. Elevated maintenance costs in an anuran (Ranacatesbeiana) exposed to a rnixture of trace elements during the
embryonic and early larval periods. Physwl. Zool. 71:27-35.
Rowe, C. L., W. J. Sadinski, and W A. Dunson. 1994. Predation on larvai and embryonic amphibians by acid-tolerant
caddisfly larvae (Ptilostomispostica).J.Herpetol. 28:357-364.
Rowe, L., and D. Ludwig. 1991. Size and timing of metamorphosis in complex life cycles: Time constraints and variation.
Ecology 72:413427.
Rowedder, W 1937. Die Entwicklung des Geruchsorgans bei
Alpes obstemiam und Bufo vubaris. Zeit. Anat. Enhvickl.
107:91-123.
Rubin, D. I., and L. M. Mendell. 1980. Location of motoneurons supplying individual muscles in norrnai and grafied
supemumerary limbs of Xenopus iumi. J. Comp. Neurol.
192:703-715.
Rubinson, K., and B. Friedman. 1977. Vagal derent projec-
LITERATURE CITED
Saint-Ange, M. 1831. Recherches anatomiques et physiologiques sur les organes transitoires et la metamorphose des
batraciens.Ann. Sci. Nat. 34.
Salthe, S. N., and W E. D u e h a n . 1973. Quantitative constraints associated with reproductive rnodes in anurans. pp.
229-249. In Evolutwnaty bwlagy of the anurans. Contemporaty
reseavch on majm p b l e m , edited by J. L. Vial. Columbia:
University of Missouri Press.
Salthe, S. N., and J. S. Mecham. 1974. Reproductive and courtship patterns. pp. 309-35 1. In Physwlogy of the Amphibia.
Vol. 2, edited by B. Lofts. New York: Academic Press.
Salvador, A. 1985. a i a de campo de hs anpwsy reptiiesde h Peninsula Iberica, Ish Baleares y Canarais. Madrid: Unigraf.
Salvatorelli, G. 1970. Osservazioni citornetriche sulgi eritrociti
di Bufo bufo durante il periodo larvale e adulto. Ann. Univ.
Fewara (SmAnat. Comp., Sezwne 13) 3: 17-27.
Sarnpson, L. i?1900. Unusual rnodes of breeding and developrnent among Anura. Amrican Nat. 34:687-715.
. 1904. A contribution to the ernbryology of Hyhdes
martiniumsiS.A m ' c a n J Anat. 3:473-504.
Sarikas, S. N. 1977. Histochemistry of egg membrana and
thickness of egg rnernbranes related to sperrn dimensions in
two species of salarnander of the genus Ambystomu. Thesis,
Southem Illinois University.
Sarnat, H. B., and M. G. Netsky. 1981. Evolution of the nmous
*em. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saruwatari, T., J. A. Lbpez, and T. W. Pietsch. 1997. Cyanine
Blue: A versatile and harrnless stain for specimen observation. Copeia 1997:840-841.
Sasaki, F., and T. Kinoshita. 1994. Adult precursor cells in the tail
epiderrnis of Xenupus tadpoles. Histochemistry 101:391-396.
Sasaki, H., and H. Mannen. 1981. Morphological analysis of
astrocytes in the bullfrog (Ranacatesbeiana) spinal cord with
special reference to the site of attachment of their processes.
J. Comp.Neurol. 198:13-35.
Satel, S. L., and R. J. Wassersug. 1981. On the relative sizes of
buccal floor depressor and elevator rnusculature in tadpoles.
Copeia 1981:129-137.
Sater, A. K., and A. G. Jacobson. 1989. The specification of
heart rnesodem occurs during gastrulation in Xenupus laet.is.
Devehpment 105321-830.
1 9 9 0 . The role of the dorsal iip in the induction of heart
rnesoderrn in Xenupus W .Devehpment 108:461470.
Sato, K . 1924. ber die Metamorphose von Bufo vubaris. Zeit.
Anat. EntwickL. 71:41-184.
Savage, J. M. 1960. Geographic variation in the tadpole of the
toad Bufo marinus. Gpeia 1960:233-235.
. 1968. The dendrobatid frogs of Central America. Copeia 1968:745-776.
. 1980a. A synopsis of the larvae of Costa Rican frogs
and toads. Bull. Southem CalzfmniaAd. Sci. 79:45-54.
. 1980b. The tadpole of the Costa Rican fringe-limbed
tree-frog, Hyh jmbrimembra. Prac. Bwl. Soc. Washington
93:1177-1183.
Savage, R M. 1935. The ecology of young tadpoles, with specific reference to some adaptations to the habit of rnass
spawning in Rana temparia tempmaria L. Proc. 2001.Soc.
London 1935:605-610.
. 1952. Ecological, physiological, and anatomical observations of some species of anuran tadpoles. Proc. Zool. Soc.
London 122:467-514.
. 1955. The ingestive, digestive and respiratory systerns
of the microhylid tadpole, Hypopachus aquae. Copeia
1955:120-127.
40 1
402
LITERATURE CITED
from Peru (Amphibia: Microhylidae). Stutt~arterBeitr: Naanuran larvae: Feeding regulation inXenupus and Rana. Bwl.
Bull. 162:214-231.
turk. (458):l-17.
Schmalhausen, I. I. 1968. The origin of terrestrial vertebrates.
. 1987. Amphibia. pp. 467-552. In Animal energetics.
New York: Academic Press.
Vol. 2, edited by T. J. Pandian and E. J. Vernberg. New York:
Academic Press.
Schmidt, B. R. 1993. Are hybridogenetic frogs cyciical parthogens? Trenak Eml. Evol. 8:271-272.
Seale, D. B., and N. Beckvar. 1980. The comparative abiiity of
Schmidt-Nielsen, B., and W. C. Mackay. 1970. Osmotic and
anuran larvae (genera: Hyiu, Bu., and Rana) to ingest susdiffisional water permeability in metamorphosing Rana
pended blue-green algae. Copeia 1980:495-503.
clamitans tadpoles. Bull. MountDesertIs. Bwl. Lab. 10:71-75. Seale, D. B., K. HoK and R. Wassersug. 1982. Xenopus laeYis
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1983.Animalphyswkyy:Aahptath and enlarvae (Amphibia, Anura) as model suspension feeders. Hydrobwigia 87:161-169.
vironment. London: Cambridge University Press.
Schmuck, R., W. Geise, and K. E. Linsenmair. 1994. Life cycle Seale, D. B., and R. J. Wassersug. 1979. Suspension feeding dynamics of anuran larvae related to their functional morpholstrategies and physiological adjustments of reedfrog tadpoles
ogy. Oeco[ogia 39:259-272.
(Amphibia,Anura, Hyperoliidae) in relation to environmental conditions. Copeia 1994:996-1007.
Sedra, S. N. 1950. The metamorphosis of the jaws and their
muscles in the toad, B u . re~uiurisReuss, correlated with
Schmutzer, W. 1977. HistopathologischeVeranderungen durch
Nephrotrema twncatum (Leuckart 1942)(Digenea: TrogloSoc. Lonchanges in the animal's feeding habits. Proc. 2001.
trematidae) in der Schwanzregion von Froshlawen (Rana
don 120:405449.
. 1951. On the morphology of the suprarostral system
temporaria L.). Zool.Anz. 198:355-368.
Schneider, L. 1957. Beidussung des Wachstums durch im
and the mandibular arch of B u . ient&inusus. P m . Egyptian
Acad. Scz. 7: 128.
Thymus enthaltene Stoffe. I. Hersteliung fraktionierter Thymusextrakte und ihre Prfung im Kaulquappenversuch.Wil- Sedra, S. N., and M. I. Michael. 1956a. The development of
the skeleton and muscles of the head from stage 55 t i l the
helm Roux' Arch. Entmz'ckiungsmech. Org. 149:644-683.
Schoonbee, H. J., J. F. Prinsloo, and J. G. Nxiweni. 1992. Obend of metamorphosis. pp. 55-68. In Nomzal table of Xenosewations on the feeding habits of larvae, juvenile, and adult
pus laevis Daudin, edited by E D. Nieuwkoop and J. Faber.
stages of the Afncan clawed frog, Xenopus iuevis, in imAmsterdam: North-Holiand.
poundments in Transkei. WaterSouth Afica 18:227-236.
. 1956b. The stnicture of the hyobranchial apparatus of
Schorr, M. S., R. Altig, and W. J. Diehl. 1991. Populational
the W y developed tadpole lama of B u . regulan5 Reuss.
changes of the enteric protozoans Opalina spp. and 2VvctothProc. Egyptian Acad. Sci. 12:3 8 4 6 .
ents mrdifomzis during the ontogeny of anuran tadpoles. J.
. 1957. The development of the skull, viscera aches, larProtowol. 37:479-481.
ynx, and visceral muscles in the South African clawed toad
Schulze, F. E. 1888. ber die inneren kiemen der BatrachierXenupw laevis (Daudin) during the process of metamorpholawen. I. Mittheilung. ber das epithel der Lippen, der
sis (from stage 55 to stage 66). E&.Knink. NederlandAkad.
Mund-, Rachen- und Kiemenhohle erwachsener larven von
Wetensch.Natuurk. 5 1:1-80.
Peiobatesfiscus. Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wts. Berlin 1888:l-59,
1 9 5 8 . The metamorphosis and growth of the hyobran4 plates.
chial apparatus of the Egyptian toad, B u . reguaris Reuss.1
. 1892. ber die inneren Kiemen der Batrachierlarven.
Molphol. 103:l-30.
11. Mitteilung. Skelet, Musculatur, Blutgefasse, Filterap. 1959. The ontogenesis of the sound conducting appaparat, respiratorische Anhiinge und Athmungsbewegungen
ratus of the Egyptian toad, Buf regularis Reuss, with a reerwachsener Lawen von Peiubatesfiscus. Abh. Preuss. Akad.
view of this apparatus in Salientia.J. Morphol. 104:359-375.
Wzss. 1892:1-66.
. 1961. Normal table of the Egyptian toad, B u . regularis
Schtte, F., and A. Ehrl. 1987. Zur Haltung und Zucht der
Reuss, with an addendum on the standardization of the
gro3en sdamerikanischen Wdenkrote Pipapipa (Linnaeus
stages considered in previous publications. Ceskoshenska
1758). Salamandra 23:256-268.
Moflol. 9:333-351.
Schtte, M., and S. G. Hoskins. 1993. Ipsilaterally projecting Sedra, S. N., and A. A. Moursi. 1958. The ontogenesis of the
retinal gangiion celis in Xennpus 1-5:
An HRP study. J.
vertebral column of B u . reguiuZ( Reuss. Mo@io~ie6:7-32.
Comp. Neurol. 331:482-494.
Seigel, R. A. 1983. Natural suwival of eggs and tadpoles of the
wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Copeia 1983:1096-1098.
Schwartz, A., and R. W. Henderson. 1991.Amphibians and reptiles of the West Indies. Descriptwns, di&butwns, and natzwal Sekar, A. G. 1992. A study of the food habits of six anuran tadhistovy. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
poles. J.Bombay Nat. Hist. SOL.89:9-16.
Schwartz, J. J., and K. D. Weiis. 1983. An experimental study Selenka, E. 1882. Der embryonale excretionsapparat des kiemof acoustic interferente between two species of neotropical
losen Hyiodes martinicensis. Sztzungsber: Kon. Preuss. Aka.
treefrogs. Anim. Behav. 31: 181-190.
Wiss.Berlrlin 117-124.
Scott, N.J., Jr., and R. D. Jennings. 1985. The tadpoles of five Semiitsch, R. D. 1990. Effects of body size, sibship, and tail
species of New Mexican leopard frogs. Occas. Pap. Mus.
injury on the susceptibility of tadpoles to dragonfly predaSouthw. Bwl. (3):1-21.
tion. CanudianJ.2001.
68: 1027-1030.
Scott-Birabn, M. T., and K. Fernndez-Marcinowski. 1921.
. 1993. Asymmetric competition in mixed populations
Variaciones locales de caracteres especficos en larvas de anof tadpoles of the hybridogenetic Rana esculenta complex.
fibios.Ann. Soc. Cient.Argentina 92: 129-144.
Evoluth 47:510-519.
Seale, D. B. 1980. Influente of amphibian lawae on primar- Semlitsch, R. D., and J. E Caldweli. 1982. Effects of density
production, nutrient flux, and competition in a pond ecosyson growth, metamorphosis, and suwivorship in tadpoles of
tem. Ecolqy 61:1531-1552.
Scaphiqus holbrooki. Ecoigy 63:905-911.
. 1982. Obligate and facultative suspension feeding in Semlitsch, R. D. and S. Gavasso. 1992. Behavioural responses
LITERATURE CITED
of Bufo bufo and Bufo caiumita tadpoles to chemical cues
of vertebrate and invertebrate predators. Ethol. Ecol. Evol.
4: 165-173.
Semiitsch, R. D., and J. W. Gibbons. 1988. Fish predation in
size-structured popuiations of treefrog tadpoles. Oewlogia
75:321-326.
Semlitsch, R. D. and H.-U. Reyer. 1992a. Modification of antipredator behaviour in tadpoles by environmental conditioning.J Anim. Ecol. 61:353-360.
. 1992b. Performance of tadpoles from the hybridogenetic Rana escuenta complex: Interactions with pond drying
and interspeciic competition. EvolutMn 46:665-676.
Semiitsch, R. D., and S. Schmiedehausen. 1994. Parenta1 contribution to variation in hatchling size and its relationship to
growth and metamorphosis in tadpoles of Rana bssonae and
Rana escubnta. Copeia 1994:406-412.
Semiitsch, R. D., D. E. Scott, and J. H . K. Pechmann. 1988.
Time and size at metamorphosis related to aduit fitness in
Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69: 184-192.
Semlitsch, R. D., D. E. Scott, J. H. K. Pechmann, and J. W.
Gibbons. 1993. Phenotypic variation in the arrivai time of
breeding salamanders: Individual repeatability and environmental influentes. J Anim. Ecol. 62:334-340.
. 1996. Structure and dynamics of an amphibian community. Evidence from a 16-yearstudy of a natural pond. pp.
217-248 h Long-temz studks of vertebrate communities. New
York: Academic Press.
Semiitsch, R. D., and H. M. Wiibur. 1989. Artificial selection
for paedomorphosis in the salamander Ambystm talpoideum. Evolutwn 43: 105-1 12.
Sem, D. G. 1972. Development of tegmental and rhombencephalic suuctures in a frog (Rana temporaria L.). Acta Anut.
82:525-548.
Serra, J. A., and R. M. Albuquerque. 1963. Anibios de Portugal. Rev. Portuguesa Zool. Bwl. Geral 4:75-227.
Sesama, I?, J. Rovira, A. C. Viaro, M. E. Bodegas, and E.
Valverde. 1995. Metamorphic changes in the stomach of the
frog Rana temporaria tadpoles. Tiss. Cell27:13-22.
Sever, D. M. 1994. Comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the
cloacae of salamanders (Amphibia: Caudata). VII. Plethodontidae. Herpetol. Monogr (8):276-33 7.
Severtsov, A. S. 1969a. Food-seizing mechanism in anuran larvae. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 187:211-214.
. 1969b. Origin of the basal elements of the hyobranchial
skeleton of larvae of amphibians. Dokl. Aka. Nauk SSSR
187:677-680.
Sexton, O. J., and C. Phillips. 1986. A qualitative study of fishamphibian interactions in 3 Missouri ponds. Trans.Missou~
Acad. Sci. 20:25-35.
Seymour, R. S. 1973. Gas exchange in spadefoot toads beneath
the ground. Copeia 1973:452460.
Seymour, R. S., and D. F. Bradford. 1995. Respiration of amphibian eggs. Physwl. Zool. 68: 1-25.
Seymour, R. S., F. Geiser, and D. F. Bradford. 1991a. Gas conductance of the jeliy capsuies of terrestriai frog eggs correlates with embryonic stage, not metaboiic demand or ambient PO,, Physwl. Zool. 64:673-687.
. 1991b. Metabolic costs of development in terrestrial
frog eggs (Pseuduphlynebibronii).Physwl. Zool. 64:688-690.
Seyrnour, R. S., M. J. Mahony, and R Knowles. 1995. Respiration of embryos and larvae of the terrestriaiiy breeding frog
Kyawanus heridgei. Herpetologica 5 1:369-3 79.
Seymour, R. S., and J. D. Roberts. 1991. Embryonic respira-
403
404
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
Smithberg, M. 1954. The origin and development of the t d in
the frog, Ranapipiens.J. Exp. sol. 127:397425.
Smith-Gili, S. J., and K. A. Berven. 1979. Predicting amphibian
metamorphosis. AmericanNat. 113:563-585.
Smith-Gill, S. J., and D. E. G d . 1978. Curvilinearities in the
competition equations: An experiment with ranid tadpoles.
AmeriEanNat. 112:557-570.
Snetkova, E., N. Chelnaya, L. Serova, S. Saveliev, E. Cherdanzova, S. Pronych, and R. Wassersug. 1995. The effects of
space fight on Xevwpus Ia&> larval development. J. Exp.
Zwl. 273:21-32.
Sobotka, J. M., and R. G. Rahwan. 1994. Lethai effect of latex
gloves on Xevwpus luevis tadpoles.J. Phamurcol. Toxicol.Meth.
32:59.
Sokal, R. R., and I. Huber. 1963. Competition among genotypes in Tribolium castaneum at varying densities and gene
frequencies (the sooty locus). American Nat. 97: 169-184.
Sokal, R. R., and I. Karten. 1964. Competition among genotypes in Tribolium custaneum at varying densities and gene
frequencies (the black locus). Genetics 49: 195-211.
Sokol, A. 1984. Plasticity in the fine timing of metamorphosis
in tadpoles of the hylid frog, Litmia ewin~i. Cupeia
1984:868-873.
Sokol, O. M. 1959. Studien an pipiden Froschen. I. Die Kauiquappe von Hpnoehirus curtipes Noble. Anat. Anz.
162:154-160.
-. 1962. The tadpole of Hymenochirus boett~eri.Cupeia
1962:272-284.
. 1975. The phylogeny of anuran larvae: A new look.
Cupeia 1975:l-23.
. 1977a. The free swimrning Pipa larvae, with a review
of pipid larvae and pipid phylogeny (Anura: Pipidae).J. Mmphol. 154:357426.
. 1977b. A subordinal classification of frogs (Amphibia:
Anura).J. 2001.182:505-508.
. 1981a. The tilter apparatus of larval Pelodyespunctatus
(Amphibia: Anura). AmphibifiReptilia 2: 195-208.
. 1981b. The larval chondrocranium of Pelodpespnctatus, with a review of tadpole chondrocrania. J Mmphol.
169:161-183.
Song, J., and L. R. Parenti. 1995. Clearing and staining whole
fish specimens for simuitaneous demonstration of bone, cartilage and nerves. Copeia 1995:114-118.
Sotelo, C. 1976. Morphology of the cerebeliar cortex. pp. 864892. In Frog neurobwlo~y,a handbwk, edited by R. Liins and
W. Precht. Beriin: Springer-Verlag.
Spaiianzani, L. 1785. Exprienmspour servir a l'histoire de lalagfratwn des animam et des plantes. Genve: Chez Barthelemi
Chirol, Libraire.
Spannhof, I., and L. Spannhof. 1971. Beobachtungen zur Brutbiologie und Larvenennvickiungvon G&othecu marsupiata.
Wiss.Zeit. Uniu.Rostock Math. Naturwiss. Reihe 20: 97-104.
Spannhof, L. 1956. Zur Morphologie und Histologie muzinhaltiger Zellen in den Nierentubuli des Kraiienfrosches.2001.
Anz. Suppl. 19:291-296.
Spannhof, L., and S. Dittrich. 1967. Histophysiologische Untersuchungen an den Flaschenzelien der Urniere vonXenupus
hmi Daudin unter experimentelien Bedingungen. Zeit. Zellfmch. Mikros.Anat. 8 1: 4 0 7 4 15.
Spannhof, L., and L. Jonas. 1969. Elektronenmikroskopische
Untersuchungen zur Genese und Sekretbiidung in den
Flaschenzellen der Urniere vom Kraiienfrosch. Zeit. Zellfwsch. Mikros. Anat. 95: 134-142.
Spemann, H. 1898. ber die Entwickiung der tuba Eustachi
405
406
LITERATURE CITED
. 1981. Sensory interactions with a central motor program in anuran larvae. Brain Res. 218: 131-140.
Stein, J. R., ed. 1975. Handbook ofphycologcal mmetak. Culture
methoak and growth mmuremenh. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Steinke, J. H., and D. G. Benson, Jr. 1970. The structure and
polysaccharide chemistry of the jeiiy envelopes of the egg of
the frog, finapipiens. J.Morphol. 130:57-66.
Steinman, R. M. 1968. An electron microscopic study of ciiiogenesis in developing epidermis and trachea in the embryo
ofXenopuslaePis.AmericanJ Anat. 122:19-56.
Steinwascher, K. 1978a. The effect of coprophagy on the
growth of fina catesbeiana tadpoles. Cupeia 1978:130134.
. 1978b. Interference and exploitation competition
among tadpoles of fina utricularia.Ewlogy 59: 1039-1046.
. 1979a. Competitive interactions arnong tadpoles: Responses to resource level. Ecology 60: 1172-1 183.
. 1979b. Host-parasite interaction as a potential
population-regulating mechanism. Ecology 60:884890.
. 1981. Competition for two resources. Oecologia
49:415-418.
Steinwascher, K., and J. Travis. 1983. Influente of food quality
and quantity on early larval growth of two anurans. Copeia
1983:238-242.
Steneck, R. S., and L. Watling. 1982. Feeding capabiiities and
h t a t i o n of herbivorous mollusc: A functional group approach. Mar Bwl. 68:299-319.
Stensaas, L. J., and S. S. Stensaas. 1971. Light and electron microscopy of motoneurons and neuropiie in the amphibian
spinal cord. Brain Res. 31:67-84.
Stephenson, E. M. T. 1951. The anatomy of the head of the
New Zealand frog, Lekpelma. Trans. 2001.Soc. London
27:255-305.
Stephenson, N. G. 1951a. Observations on the development of
the amphicoelous frogs, Leiopelma and Ascaphus. J. Linnean
Soc. (Zool.) 42: 18-28.
. 1951b. On the development of the chondrocranium
Soc. Lunand visceral arches of Lewpelma anheyi. Trans.2001.
don 27:203-252.
. 1955. On the development of the frog, Lewpelma hochstetteri Fitzinger. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lonun 124:785-795.
Sterba, G. 1950. ber die morphologischen und histogenetischen Thymusprobleme bei Xenopus les Daudin nebst einigen Bemerkungen uber die Morphologie der Kaulquappen. Abh. Slrchs. AAkad. Wiss.Leipz& 44:1-55.
Stevenson, H. M. 1976. Vertebrates ofFlorida. IdentzfiEatwn and
distn'bution.Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.
Stiffler, D. F. 1996. Exchanges of calcium with the environment
and between body compartments in Amphibia. Physwl.
Zool. 69:418434.
Stiiiing, H . 1898. Zur Anatomie der Nebenniere. Anh. Mikros.
Anat. EntwicklzLngsmech. 52: 176-195.
Stirling, R. R, and E. G. Merrill. 1987. Functional morphology
of frog retinal ganglion ceiis and their central projections:
The dimming detect0rs.J. Comp.Neurol. 258:477495.
Stohr, P. 1882. Zur Entwickiungsgeschichte des Anurenschadels. Zeit. WZs.Zool. 36:68-103.
Stokely, I? S., and J. C. List. 1954. The progress of ossification
in the skull of the cricketfrog P s e u h nigrita triseriata. Copeia 1954:211-217.
. 1955. Observations on the development of the anuran
urostyle. Trans.Amoican Micros. Soc. 74: 112-1 15.
Stone, L. S. 1922. Experiments on the development of the cra-
LITERATURE CITED
407
Ammnian dart-poison frog, Dendrobates ventrttrtmacuhtus. Takisawa, A., Y. Ohara, and K. Kan. 1952a. Die KaumuskulaBehav. Ecol. 8:260-267.
tur der Anuren (BufO vuharisjaponicus) wahrend der Metarnorphose. OkajimmFolia Anat. Japonica 24: 1-28.
Summey, M. R., and A. Mathis. 1998. Alarrn responses to
chemicai stimuli frorn damanged conspecifics by larval an- Takisawa, A., Y. Ohara, and Y. Sunaga. 1952b. Uber die Urngesurans: Tests of three neotropical species. Herpetologica
taltung der Mrn. interrnandibularesder Anuren wahrend der
Metamorphose. O&imas Folia Anat. Japonica 24:2 17-241.
54:402408.
Sssbier, W 1936. Anlage und Metamorphose der Driisen der Takisawa, A., and Y. Sunaga. 1951. Uber die Entwickiung des
M. depressor rnandibulae bei Anuren irn Laufe der MetaDarrnwandung bei den Anuren. Zeit. Wks. Zool.
148:309-349.
rnorphose. OkajimmFoliaAnat.Japonica 23:273-293.
Sutherland, R. M., and R. F. Nunnernacher. 1981. Fibers in Tanaka, S., and M. Nishinara. 1987. Foam nest as a potential
spinal nerves of treefrogs: Eleutherodactylus and Hyh. J.
food source for anuran larvae: A preiiminary experirnent. J.
Ethol. 5:86-88.
Comp.Neurol. 202:415-420.
Swammerdam, J. 1737-1738. Bibliu Naturae. Vol. 11. Leyden: Tang, Y.-Y., and C. M. Rovainen. 1996. Cardiac output inXenuI. Severinus.
pus &mis tadpoles during developrnent and in response to an
Swanepoel, J. H. 1970. The ontogenesis of the chondrocraadenosine agonist. AmericanJ. Physwl. 270R997-1004.
nium and of the nasal sac of the rnicrohylid frog Breviceps Tanirnura, A., and H. Iwasawa. 1986. Developrnent of gonad
adcpenwpentheri Werner.Ann. Univ.Stellenbosch 45A: 1-1 19.
and Bidder's organ in Bufo japonicus$msus: Histological
obsemation. Sci. Rept. Nigata Unia. (23)D:11-21.
Swart, C. C., and R. O. De S. 1999. The chondrocranium of
. 1987. Germ cell kinetics in gonadal developrnent in the
the Mexican burrowing toad, Rhznophrynus doralis (Anura:
toad Bufo japonicusfOmsus. Zool. Sci. 4:657-664.
Rhinophrynidae).J Helpetol. 33 :23-28.
Sweet, S. S. 1980. Aiiometric inference in rnorphology. Ameri. 1988. Ultrastructurd observations on the origin and
differentiation of sornatic cells during gonadal developrnent
can 2001.
20:643-652.
in the frog Rana nipomauhta. Develop. Gvoiah Dzffm
Swofford, D. L., and G. J. Olsen. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. pp. 41 1-501. In Mobcuhr Systematics, edited by D. M.
30:681-691.
Hiilis and C. Moritz. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
. 1989. Origin of somatic cells and histogenesis in the
Syuzyamova, L. M., and N. L. Iranova. 1988. Morphological
primordial gonad of the Japanese tree frog Rhaophorrrs arbcharacteristics and energy rnetaboiisrn in the tadpoles of
meus. Anat. Embryol. 180:165-173.
Rana awalis bread [sic] at different diets. EkologZya
. 1991. Proliferative activity of sornatic cells during go1988:18-24.
nadal development in the Japanese pond frog, Rana n@oSzabo, T, J.-P. Denzot, S. Blahser, M. Veron-Ravaiiie, and D.
mauhta.J. Exp. 2001.
259:365-370.
Rouilly. 1990. The olfactoretinalis systern does not corre- Tanim, J. B. 1975. Egg volume. Auk 92:576-580.
spond to the "terminal nerve" as ascribed to F. Pinkus. Soc. Taugner, R., A. Schiller, and S. Ntokalou-Knittel. 1982. Cells
Neurosci.A b a , p. 129.
and intercellular contacts in glorneruii and tubules of the
Szarski, H . 1957. The origin of the larva and rnetamorphosis in
frog kidney: A freeze-fracture and thin section study Cell
Amphibia. American Nat. 91 :283-301.
Tiss. Res. 226: 589-608.
Szkely, G. 1976. The rnorphology of rnotoneurons and dorsal Taxi, J. 1976. Morphology of the autonomic nervous systern.
root fibers in the frog's spinal cord. BrainRes. 103:275-290.
pp. 93-1 50. In Frog neurobwlogy,a handbook, edited R Llins
Szkely, G., N. Antal, and T. Gorcs. 1980. Direct dorsal root
and W. Precht. New York: Springer-Verlag.
projection onto the cerebellum in the frog. Neurosci. Lett. Taylor, A. C., and J. J. Kollros. 1946. Stages in the normal development of Ranapipiens larvae. Anat. Rec. 94:7-24.
19:161-165.
Szkely, G., and G. Czh. 1976. Organization of locomotion. Taylor, C. L., and R. Altig. 1995. Oral disc kinernatics of four
rheophilous anuran tadpoles. Helpetol.Nat. Hist. 3: 101-106.
pp. 765-792. In Frog neurobwlogy, a handbook, edited by R.
Llins and W Precht. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Taylor, C. L., R. Altig, and C. R. Boyle. 1995. Can anuran tadTachibana, T. 1978. The Merkel cell in the labial ridge epidermis
poles choose among foods that vary in quaiity? Alytes
of anuran tadpole. I. Fine smcture, distribution, and cyto13:81-86.
. 1996. Oral disc kinernatics of four lentic anuran tadchemical studies.Anat. Rec. 191:487-502.
Tachihama, H., F. Sasaki, T. Tachibana, H. Iseki, T. Horiguchi,
poles. Herpetol. Nat. Hist. 4~49-56.
T. Kinoshita, and K. Watanabe. 1987. Fine structure and de- Taylor, D. H., and D. E. Ferguson. 1970. Extraoptic celestial
generation of the horny teeth and the epidermis of the labial
orientation in the southem cricket frog Acrisgryllus. Science
168:390-392.
ridge of the anuran tadpole. Eurumi Univ. Dental J.
13:49-63.
Taylor, D. H., C. W. Steele, and S. Strickier-Shaw. 1990. Responses of green frog (Rana chmitans) tadpoles to leadTahin, Q. S., N. C. Meirelles, and S. B. Gargoggini. 1979. Amrnoneoteiisrn and ureoteiisrn of terrestrial and aquatic ampolluted water. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9: 87-93.
Taylor, E. H. 1942. Tadpoles of Mexican Anura. Univ. Knsas
phibians. Cienc. Cult. (So Paulo) 31:771-774.
Taigen, T. L., and F. H. Pough. 1985. Metaboiic correlates of
Sci. Bull. 28: 37-55.
anuran behavior. American Zool. 25:987-997.
. 1954. Frog-egg-eating tadpoles of Anotheca cmonata
Taigen, T. L., F. H. Pough, and M. M. Stewart. 1984. Water
(Stejneger)(Saiientia, Hyiidae). Univ. Knsas Sci. Bull.
balance of terrestrial anuran Ebutherodactylus cogui eggs: Im36:589-596.
portance of parenta1 care. Ecology 65:248-255.
Taylor, J. D., and J. T. Bagnara. 1972. Dermal chromatophores.
Takahashi, H. 1971. Sex differentiation and development of the
American Zool. 12:43-62.
gonad in Rana rugosa. 2001.
Mag. (Tokyo) 80:15-21.
Taylor, J. S. H., and A. Roberts. 1983. The early development
Takasu, T., and H. Iwasawa. 1983. Ultrasmctural studies on
of the primary sensory neurones in an amphibian embryo: A
the testicular differentiation in the frog Rha~ophorusarboreus.
scanning electron microscope study J. Embryol. lhp. Mor2001.
Mag. (Tokyo) 92:501. (Abstr.)
phol. 5:49-66.
408
LITERATURE CITED
Taylor, R E., Jr., and S. B. Barker. 1965. Transepidermai potential dXerence: Development in anuran larvae. Science
148:1612-1613.
Taylor, R. J. 1976. Value of clumping to prey and the evolutionary response of ambush predators. American Nat. 110:
13-29.
. 1979. The value of clumping to prey when detectability
increases with group size. AmericanNat. 113:299-301.
Taylor, W. R. 1977. Observations on specimen fkation. Proc.
Biol. Soc. Washington 90: 753-763.
Tejedo, M. 1991. Effects of predation by two species of sympatric tadpoles on embryo survival in natterjack toads (Bufocahmita).Herpetologca 47: 322-327.
. 1992. Absence of the uade-off between the size and
number of offspring in the natterjack toad (Bufo cahmita).
Oecologa 90:294296.
Tejedo, M., and R. Reques. 1992. Effects of egg size and density
on metamorphic traits in tadpoles of the natterjack toad
(Bufocalamita).J. Herpetol. 26: 146-152.
. 1994a. Does larvai growth history determine timing of
metamorphosis in anurans? A field experiment. Herpetologica 50:113-118.
. 1994b. Plasticity in metamorphic traits of natterjack
tadpoles: The interactive effeas of density and pond duration. Oikos 71:295-304.
Ten Donkelaar, H. J., and R. De Boer-Van Huizen. 1982. Observations on the development of descending pathways from
the brain stem to the spinal cord in the clawed toad Xenupus
W s . Anat. Embyol. 163:461473.
Teran, H. R., and A. M. De Cerasuolo. 1988. Estudio histomorfolgico de1 tracto digestivo larval de Gastmthecagracilis
Laurent (Anura Hylidae). Neotrpica 34: 115-123.
Terent'ev, P. V., and S. A. Chernov. 1965. Kq to tbe amphibians
and reptiies. 3d enlarged ed. [English Translation]. Israel Program for Scientiic Translation, Jerusalem.
Terhivuo, J. 1988. Phenology of spawning for the common frog
(Rana temporaria L.) in Finland from 1846 to 1986. Ann.
Zool. Fennici 25:165-175.
Test, F. H., and R G. McCann. 1976. Foraging behavior of
Bufo a m e h n w tadpoles in response to high densities of micro-organisms. Copeia 1976:576-578.
Tevis, L., Jr. 1966. Unsuccessful breeding by desert toads (Bufo
punctatus) at the limit of their ecological tolerante. Ecohgy
47: 766-775.
Theil, E. C. 1970. Red blood ceii replacement during the transition from embryonic (tadpole) hemoglobin to adult (frogj
hemoglobin in Rana catesbeiana. Comp. Biochem. Physwl.
33:717-720.
Thibaudeau, D. G., and R. Altig. 1988. Sequence of ontogenetic development and atrophy of the oral apparatus of six
anuran tadpo1es.J. Morphol. 197:63-69.
Thibier-Fouchet,C., O. Mulner, and R. Ozon. 1976. Progesterone biosynthesis and metabolism by ovarian foilicles and isolated oocytes ofXenupush v k . Bwl. Reprod. 14:3 17-326.
Thiele, J. 1888. Der Hafiapparat der Batrachierlarven. Zeit.
Wiss.Zool. 46:67-79.
Thomas, E. I. 1972. Structure of the heart in the tadpole larvae
of Rana tzkrinu Daud. Ann. Zool.,Agra 8:41-50.
Thompson, R L. 1996. Larval habitat, ecology, and parental
invesunent of Osteopilus h n n e u s (Hylidae). pp. 259-269.
In Contributwns to West Indian hqetolagy: A tribute to Albert
S h a r t z , edited by R. Poweii and R. W. Henderson. Contrib. Herpetol., vol. 12. Ithaca, NY: Society for the Study of
Amphibians and Reptiies.
LITERATURE CITED
. 1983a. Variation in development patterns of larval anurans in temporary ponds. I. Persistent variation within a
Hylagratwsa population. Evolutwn 37:496-5 12.
. 1983b. Variation in growth and survival of Hyhgratiosa larvae in experimental enclosures. Copeia 1983:232237.
. 1984. Anuran size at metamorphosis: Experimental
test of a model based on intraspecific competition. Ecology
65:1155-1160.
Travis, J., S. B. Emerson, and M. Blouin. 1987. A quantitativegenetic analysis of larval Me-history traits in Hyh m q e 1 :
Evolutian 41:145-156.
Travis, J., W. H. Keen, and J. Juilianna. 1985a. The effects of
muitiple factors on viability selection in Hyhgratiasa tadpoles. Evolution 39: 1087-1099.
. 1985b. The role of relative body size in a predator-prey
relationship between dragonfly naiads and larval anurans.
Oihs 45:59-65.
Travis, J., and J. C. Trexler. 1986. Interactions among factors
affecting growth, development, and survival in experimental
popuiations of Bufo tewestris (Anura: Bufonidae). Oecalogia
69: 110-116.
Treisman, M. 1975. Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion. Anim. Behav.
23: 779-800.
Trenerry, M. P. 1988. The ecology of tadpoles in a tropical rainforest stream. Honours thesis, James Cook University,
Townsviile, Queensland, Australia.
Trewavas, E. 1933. The hyoid and larynx of the Anura. Trans.
Roy. Phiiosqh. Soc. Loruion 222:401-527.
Tmeb, L. 1973. Bones, frogs, and evolution. pp. 65-132. In
Evolutwnary bwlogy of the anurans. Contempmary research on
majorpmblems, edited by J. L. Vial. Columbia: University of
Missouri Press.
. 1979. Leptodactylid frogs of the genus Telmatobim in
Eqador with the description of a new species. Copeia
1979:714733.
. 1985. A summary of osteocranial development in anurans with notes on the sequence of cranial ossification in
Rhinophynus dmalis (Anura: Pipoidea: Rhinophrymdae).
South AficanJ. Sci. 81:181-1 85.
. 1993. Patterns of cranial diversity among the Lissamphibia. pp. 255-343. In The vertebrateskull, edited by J. Hanken and B. Haii. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tmeb, L., and D.C. Cannatelia. 1982. The cranial osteology and
hyolaryngeal apparatus of Rhinophrynw domalZr (Anura: Rhinophrynidae) with comparisons to Recent pipid frogs. J.
Motphol. 171:1140.
. 1986. Systematics, morphology, and phylogeny of genus Pipa (Anura: Pipidae). Herpetolo~ica42:412449.
Tmeb, L., and W. E. Dueilman. 1970. The systematic status
and Me history of Hyh vmcigeva Werner. Copeia
1970:601-610.
Tmeb, L., and J. Hanken. 1993. Skeletal development in Xempus uevzj (Anura: Pipidae).J. Morphol. 214: 1 4 1 .
Tschugunova, T J. 1981. Interfiontalia in Bombina orientalis
(Blgt) and Bombina bombina (L.). pp. 117-121. In Herpeto@cal investgatwnsin Sibwut and the Far East, edited by L. J.
Borkin. Leningrad: Akad. Nauk SSSR.
Tsuneki, K., H. Kobayashi, R. Gallardo, and P. K. T. Pang.
1984. Electron microscopic study of the inne~ationof the
renal tubuies and urinary bladder epithelium in Rana catesbeiana and Nectums muiosus. J. Morphol. 181:143-154.
Tubbs, L. O. E., R. Stevens, M. Weils, and R. Altig. 1993. On-
409
togeny of the oral apparatus of the tadpole of Bufo a m . canus. Amphibia-Reptilia 14:333-340.
Tung, T. C. 1935. On the time of determination of the dorsoventral axis of the pronephros in Discoglossw. Peking Nat.
Hist. Bull. l0:115.
Tung, T. C., and S. H. KY. 1944. Experimental studies on the
development of the pronephric duct in anuran embryos. J.
Anat. 78: 52-57.
Turner, R. J. 1969. The functional development of the reticuloendothelial system in the toad, Xenopm uevzj (Daudi). J.
Exp. Zool. 170:467480.
Turner, R. J., and M. J. Manning. 1972. Response of the toad,
Xenopus laevis, to circuiating antigens. I. Cellular changes in
the spleen.f . Exp. Zool. 183:21-34.
. 1974. Thymic dependente of amphibian antibody responses. EuropeanJ Immunol. 4:343-346.
Turpen, J. B., and C. M. Knudson. 1982. Ontogeny of hematopoietic ceils in Ranapipiens: Precursor celi migration during
embryogenesis.Deveiup. B d . 89: 138-15 1.
Turpen, J. B., C. M. Knudson, and P. S. Hoefen. 1981a. Embyonic origin of hematopoietic precursor cels from the region of the presumptive mesonephros in Ranapipiens. Anat.
Rec. 199:261. (Abstr.)
. 1981b. The early ontogeny of hematopoietic cells studied by grafting cytogenetically labeled tissue aniagen: Localization of a prospective stem ceii compartment. Deveiup.
Bwl. 85:99-112.
Turpen, J. B., C. J. Turpen, and M. Flajnik. 1979. Experimental
analysis of hematopoietic celi development in the liver of larvai Ranapipns. Develup. Bwl. 69:466479.
Turnipseed, G., and R. Altig. 1975. Popuiation density and age
structure of three species of hylid tadpoles. J. Herpetol.
9:287-291.
Twitty, i? C. 1955. Eye. pp. 402414. InAnalyk ofdeaeiupment,
edited by B. H. Willier, P. A. Weiss, and i? Hamburge~Philadelphia: W B. Saunders.
. 1966. Of scientZrts and salamandem. San Francisco:
W. H. Freeman.
Twombly, S. 1996. Timing of metamorphosis in a freshwater
crustacean: Comparison with anuran models. Ecology
77: 1855-1866.
Tyler, M. J. 1962. On the presemation of anuran tadpoles. AustralianJ Sci. 25:222.
. 1963. A taxonomic study of amphibians and reptiles of
the Central Highlands of New Guinea, with notes on their
ecology and biology. 2. Anura: Ranidae and Hylidae. Trans.
Roy. SOC.
South Australia 86: 105-130.
. 1968. Papuan hylid frogs of the genus Hyh. Zool. Vmh.
(96):1-203,4 plates.
. 1971. The phylogenetic significance of vocal sac structure in hylid frogs. Univ. Knsas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist.
19:319-360.
. 1985. Reproductive modes in Australian Arnphibia. pp.
265-267. In Biology ofAustrahn'anF70gsand reptiles, edited by
G. Grigg, R. Shine, and H. Ehmann. Chipping Norton,
New South Wales: Surrey Beatty.
. 1989. A~alianJTogs.Penguin Books Australia, Ringwood, Victoria.
Tyler, M. J., and M. Anstis. 1975. Taxonomy and biology of
frogs of the Litoria citropa mmplex (Anura: Hylidae). Rec.
South Australia Mus. 17:41-50.
Tyler, M. J., M. Anstis, G. A. Crook, and M. Davies. 1983. Reproductive biology of the frogs of the Magela Creek system,
Northern Territory. Rec. South Australia Mw. 18:415440.
410
LITERATURE CITED
LITERATURE CITED
Van Buskirk, J., and K. L. Yurewicz. 1998. Effects of predators
on prey growth rate: Relative contributions of thinning and
reduced aaivity. Oikos 82:20-28.
Vance, W H., G. L. Clifton, M. L. Applebaum, W D. Wiis,
Jr., and R. E. Coggeshail. 1975. Unmyelinated preganglionic fibers in frog ventral roots. J Comp. Neurol.
164:117-126.
Van de Karner, J. C. 1965. Histologicai structure and cytology
of the pineai cornplex in fishes, amphibians and reptiles.
Proo~Brain Res. 10:3 0 4 8 .
Van Den Broek, A. J. P., G. J. Van Oordt, and G. C. Hirsch.
1938. Das Urogenitalsystem. pp. 683-854. In Handbuch der
vergleischenden Anatomie dere Wirbeltime, edited by L. Bolk,
E. Goeppen, E. Kallius, and W Lubosch. Berlin: Urban &
Schwarzenberg.
Van Der Horst, C. J. 1934. The lateral line nerves of Xenupus.
Psychiat. Neurol. B1. Amsterdum 3:426-435.
Van Der Linden, J. A. M., and H. J. Ten Donkelaar. 1987. Observations on the developrnent of cerebellar af'ierents inXenopus laevis. Anat. Embyol. 176:431-439.
Van Der Linden, J. A. M., H . J. Ten Donkelaar, and R. De
Boer-van Huizen. 1988. Development of spinocerebellar
af'ierents in the clawed toad, Xenopus iuevis.J Comp. Neurol.
277:41-52.
Van Der Westhuizen, C. M. 1961. The development of the
chondrocranium of Heleophynepumlli Sclater, with special
reference to the palatoquadrate and the sound-conducting
apparatus. Acta 2001.42: 1-72.
Van Dijk, E. D. 1959. On the cloacal region of Anura in particular of larvai Ascaphus. Ann. Univ.Stellenbosch 35: 169-249.
. 1966. Systematic and field keys to the families, genera,
and described species of southern African anuran tadpoles.
Ann. Natal Mus. 18:231-286.
. 1972. The behavior of southern African anuran tadpoles with particular reference to their ecology and related
external morphologicai features. 2001.
Ajkmna 7:49-55.
. 1981. Material data other than preserved specimens.
Monit. Zool. Italiano (N.S.)Suppl. 15:393-400.
. 1985. Hemisus mamratum adults reported to carry
tadpoles. SouthAfTzcanJ Sci. 8 1:209-210.
Van Eeden, J. A. 1951. The development of the chondrocranium ofrircaphustruei Stejneger with special reference to the
relations of the palatoquadrate to the neurocranium. Acta
2001.32:41-176.
Van Gansen, P. 1986. Ovognese des amphibiens. pp. 21-55.
In Trait de Zoologie,Anatomie, Systematique, Biologie. Vol. 14,
Fasc. lB, edited by P. P. Grass and M. Delsol. Paris:
- Masson.
Van Geertruyden, J. 1946. Recherches exprimentales s u la formation du msonphros chez les amphibiens anoures. Arch.
Bwl. 57:145-181.
. 1948. Des premiers stades de dveloppement du msonphros chez les amphibiens anoures. Acta Morphol. Neerbndo Scandinavica 6:1-17.
Van Kampen, P. N. 1923. The Amphibia of the Indo-Australian
archz$eboo. Leiden: E. J . Bri, Ltd. (29 figs).
Van Mier, P., and H. J. Ten Donkelaar. 1988. The development
of primary af'ierents to the lumbar spinal cord in Xenupus
l m i . Neurosci. Lett. 84:35 4 0 .
Van Mier, P., R. Van Rheden, and H. J. Ten Donkelaar. 1985.
The development of the dendritic organization of primary
and motoneuons in the spinal cord of &nupus 1ami. An
HRP study.Anat. Embyol. 172:311-324.
Vannini, E., and P. P. Giorgi. 1969. Organogenesi de1 I'apparato
'
41 1
412
LITERATURE CITED
Funktion, Leistung bei der Nahrungsaufnahme und okologopmentai biology, evolution and phylogenesis? Int. J. Deische Bedeutung.Mainzer Natumiss.Archiv. 34: 187-263.
ve@. Bwl. 402359-869.
Vietti, M., A. Cianca Perone, and A. Guardabassi. 1973. Pro- Wake, D. B., K. C. Nishikawa, U. Dicke, and G. Roth. 1988.
nephric degeneration in normal and prolactin treated larvae
Organization of the motor nuclei in the cemicai spinal cord
from Rana temporaria, in correlation with metamorphosis.
of salamanders.J. Comp.Neurol. 278: 195-208.
Boll. Zool. 40:401404.
Wake. M. H. 1977. Fetal maintenance and its evolutionarv
significance in the Amphibia: Gymnophiona. J. ~ e r p e t o .
Vigny, C. 1979. Morphologie larvaire de 12 espces et s o u 11:379-386.
espces due genre Xenupus. Rev. Suisse 2001.865377-891.
. 1978. The reproductive biology of Eieutherodadylus
Vaa, J., R. W. McDiarmid, and J. M. Gailardo. 1982. Arthrojmperi (Amphibia, Anura. Leptodactylidae),with comments
pod predators of leptodactylid frog foam nests. Bvenesia 191
on the evolution of live-bearing systems. J. Herpetol.
20:577-589.
12:121-133.
Via, J., and C. E. Valerio. 1982. Red, white, and brown. Pre. 1979. The comparative anatomy of the urogenital sysliminary observations on the color of the centrolenid tadpole
tem. pp. 555-614. In Hyman3 cmnparative vertebate anat(Amphibia: Anura: Centrolenidae). Brenesiu 19/20:1-1 6.
omy, edited by M. H. Wake. 3d ed. Chicago: University of
Viy, F. 1890. The development of the ear and accessory organs
in the common frog. Quart.J.Mimos. Soc. 30:523-550.
Chicago Press.
Viiter, V., and A. Lugand. 1959. Recherches sur le dtermini. 1980. The reproductive biology ofNectophlynoidesmalcolmi (Amphibia: Bufonidae), with comments on the evolusme interne et externe du corps jaune gestatif chez le crapaud
tion of reproductive modes in the genus Nectoph~noides.Covivipare du Mont Nimba, le Nectophlynoides occidentalis Ang.
peiu 1980:193-209.
de Ia Haute Guine. C. R Soc. Bwl. Paris 153:294-297.
Vine, I. 1973. Detection of prey flodrs by predators. J. Theol: --. 1982. Diversity within a framework of constraints. AmBwl. 40:207-210.
phibian reproductive modes. pp. 87-106. In Environmental
Viparina, S., and J. J. Just. 1975. The life period, growth, and
adaptatwn and evolution, edited by D. Mossakowski and G.
differentiation ofRanacatesbeiuna larvae occurring in nature.
Rotk New York: Gustav Fischer-Verlag.
. 1989. Phylogenesis of direct development and viviparCopeia 1975:103-109.
ity in vertebrates. pp. 235-250. Ln ComplexorganismalfincVisser, J. 1985. The fanglike teeth of the early larvae of some
twns: Integratwn and evolutwn in vertebrates, edited by D. B.
Hewhlyne. South AjncanJ. Sci. 8 1:200-202.
Vitalis, T. Z. 1990. Pulmonary and cutaneous oxygen uptake
Wake and G. Roth. New York: Wiiey.
and oxygen consumption of isolated skin in the frog, Rana
. 1993a. The skuU as a locomotor organ. pp. 197-240.
In The skull. Vol. 3. Functwnd and evolutwnary mechanisms.
pipiens. R e s - Physwl. 8 1:391400.
Vizotto, L. D. 1967. Desenvolvimento de anuros da regio norteEdited by J. Hanken and B. K. Hail. Chicago: Universiq of
ocdental do Estado de So Paulo. Fac. Fiiosof. Cinc. Letr.
Chicago Press.
Zool. So Jose Rio Prto No. Especial. 161 p.
. 1993b. Evolutionary scenarios, homology and converVogt, C. C. 1842. Untenuchungen uber die Entwickelungsgente of s t n i c t ~ ~specializations
al
for vertebrate vivipariq.
geschuhte dev Geburtsheljierkrote.Solothurn.
A m ' c a n Zool. 32:256-263.
Vokov, V I. 1982. Morphological characteristics of the frog
. 1993c. Evolution of oviductai gestation in amphibians.
(Rana ridibunda) myocytes in the process of cardiogenesis.
J. Exp. Zool. 266:394413.
Arch. Anat, Cistol.Embryol. 82:73-80.
Wake, M. H., and J. Hanken. 1982. Development of the skuil
Voris, H . K., and J. P. Bacon, Jr. 1966. Differentiai predation
of Demz~phismexicanus (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), with
on tadpoles. Copeia 1966:594-598.
cornments on skull kinesis and amphibian relationships.J.
Wachtel, S. S., G. C. Koo, and E. A. Boyse. 1975. EvolutionMorphol. 173:203-223.
ary conservation of H-Y ("maie") antigen. Naure Wakeman, J. M., and G. R. Ultsch. 1976. The effects of
254:270-272.
dissolved 0, and CO, on metabolism and gas-exchangeparWager, V. A. 1929. The breeding habits and life-histories of
titioning in aquatic saiamanders. Physwl. Zool. 48:348-359.
some of the Transvaal Amphibia. -11. Trans. Roy. Soc. South Waldman, B. 1981. Sibling recognition in toad tadpoles: The
A j k a 17:125-135.
role of experiente. Zeit. Tierpsychol. 56:341-358.
. 1965. Theji-08sofSouthAfzca.Cape Town and Johan. 1982a. Sibiing association among schoohg toad tadnesburg: Purneil& Sons Pty., Ltd.
poles: Field evidence and implications. Anim. Behav.
. 1986. Frogs of South Afzca. Theirfmcinating life stories.
30:700-713.
Craighaii: Delta Books.
. 1982b. Adaptive significance of communai oviposition
Wagner, E., and M. Ogielska. 1990. Oogenesis and developin wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Behav. Ecol. Socwbwl.
ment of the ovary in European green frog, Rana ridibunda
10:169-174.
(Pailas).11.Juvenile stages until adults. 2001. Jahrb.Abt. Anat,
. 1984. Kin recognition and sibiing association among
Ontog. TTiere 120:223-231.
wood frog (Rana sylvaticu) tadpoles. Behav. Ecol. Socwbwl.
Wakahara, M. 1978. Induction of supernumerary primordial
14:171-180.
germ ceils by injecting vegetal pole cytoplasm into Xenupus
. 1985a. OKactory basis of kin recognition in toad tadeggs. J. Exp. Zool. 203: 159-164.
p01es.J. Gmp. Physwl. 156:565-577.
. 1982. Chronological changes in the accumulation of
. 1985b. Sibling recognition in toad tadpoles: Are kinPoly (A)+RNA in developingcells ofXenupusla&~,with speship labels transferred among individuais? Zeit. T ~ s y c h o l .
cial reference to PGCs. Deve@. Growth Dzffm 24:311-318.
68:41-57.
Wake, D. B. 1970. Aspects of vertebral evolution in the modern
. 1986a. Preference for unfamiliar siblings over familiar
Amphibia. F o m et Functio 3:33-60.
nonsiblings in American toad (Bufo a&canus) tadpoles.
Wake, D. B., and J. Hanken. 1996. Direct development in the
Anim. Behav. 34:48-53.
lungless salamanders: What are the consequences for devel. 1986b. Chemical ecology of kin recognition in anuran
LITERATURE CITED
413
414
LITERATURE CITED
Weber, M. 1898. Ueber auffdende ecaudaten-larven von Tjibodas (Java).Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenwrg Suppl. 2:5-10.
Weigmann, D. L. 1982. Relationships between production and
abundance of ranid (Ranapipiens,R. catesbeiana, and R. clamitans) tadpoles and the effeas of tadpole grazing on algal
productivity and diversity and on phosphoms, nitrogen, and
organic carbon. Dissertation, Michigan State University.
Weisz, P, B. 1945a. The development and morphology of the
larva of the South Mrican clawed toad, Xenopus mm I. The
third-form tadpo1e.J Morphol. 77: 163-191.
. 1945b. The development and morphology of the larva
of the South Atrican clawed toad, Xenupus heras 11. The
hatching and the first- and second-form tadpoles. J. Morphol. 77: 193-217.
Weils, K. D. 1978. Courtship and parental behavior in a Panamanian poison-arrow frog (Dendrobatesauratus).Hnptologica 34:148-155.
. 1980. Evidence for growth of tadpoles during parentai
transport in Colosrethus ingztinalis.J Herpetol. 14:426-428.
Wells, K. D., and K. M. Bard. 1988. Parenta1 behavior of an
aquatic-breeding tropical frog, Leptoductylus bolivianus. J.
Herpetol. 22:361-364.
Wenig, J. 1913. Der Albinismus bei den Anuren, nebst Bemerkungen uber den Bau des Amphibien integuments. Anat.
Anz. 43:113-135.
Werner, E. E. 1986. Amphibian metamorphosis: Growth rate,
predation rate, and the optimai size at transformation. Ameruan Nat. 128:3 19-341.
. 1988. Size, scaling, and the evolution of complex life
cycles. pp. 60-81. In Size-mctured populatwns: Ecology and
evolutwn, edited by B. Ebenman and L. Persson. Berlin:
Springer-Verlag.
. 1991. Nonlethai effeas of a predator on competitive
interactions between two anuran larvae. Ecology 72:17091720.
. 1994. Ontogenetic scaiing of competitive relations:
Size-dependent effeas and responses in two anuran larvae.
Ecology 75: 197-213.
Werner, E. E., and B. R. Anliolt. 1996. Predator-induced behaviorai indirect effeas: Consequences to competitive interactions in anuran larvae. Ecoio~y771157-169.
Werner, E. E., and J. F. Giiiiam. 1984. The ontogenetic niche
and species interactions in size-structured popuiations. Ann.
Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15:393-425.
Werner, E. E., and M. A. McPeek. 1994. Direct and indirea
effeas of predators on two anuran species aiong an environmental gradient. Ecolgy 75: 1368-1382.
Werschkul, D. F., and M. T. Christensen. 1977. Differentiai
predation by Lepomis macrochims on the eggs and tadpoles of
Rana. Herpetoio~ica33:237-241.
Wessels, N. K. 1968. Problems in the anaiysis of determination,
mitosis and differentiation. pp. 132-151. In Epitheliamesenchymal interactwns. 18th Hahnemann Symp., edited by
R. Fleischmajer and R. E. Biiiingham. Baitimore: Williams
and Wiikins.
Wessenberg, H. S. 1978. Opaiinata. pp. 552-581. In Parasitu
p t o w a . Vol. I I . Intestinal jlqellates, histomonad, tt-ichomunads, amueba, opalinid, and ciliates, edited by J. P. Kreier. New
York: Academic Press.
West, N. H., and W. W. Burggren. 1982. Giii and lung ventilatory responses to steady-state aquatic hypoxia and hyperoxia
in the bullfrog tadpole. Respir. Physiol. 47:165-176.
. 1983. Reflex interactions between aerial and aquatic
gas exchange organs in larvai bulkfrogs. AmericanJ. Physwl.
244R. 770-777.
LITERATURE CITED
415
416
LITERATURE CITED
Will, U., and B. Fritzsch. 1988. The eighth nerve of amphibians: Peripheral and central distribution. pp. 159-183. In The
molutwn of the amphibian auditmy system, edited by B.
Fritzsch, M. J. Ryan, W. Wilczynski, T. E. Hetherington,
and W. Walkowiak. New York: Wdey.
Wiii, U., B. Fritzsch, G. Luhede, and P. Gorner. 1985. The area
octavo-lateralis in Xenopus W . Part 11. Second order
projections and cytoarchitecture. Ce11 Tiss. Res. 239: 163175.
Willey, A. 1893. Note on the position of the cloacal aperture in
certain batrachian tadpoles. Trans. Nav T i k Acad. Sci.
12:242-245.
Willhite, C., and P. V Cupp, Jr. 1982. Daily rhythms of thermal
tolerante in Rana chmitans (Anura: Ranidae) tadpoles.
Comp.Biochem. Physwl. 72A.255-257.
Wfiams, G. C. 1964. Measurement of consociation among
fishes and comments on the evolution of schooling. Publ.
Mus. Michhan St. Univ. 2: 35 1-383.
Wdiams, J. D., and E. Gudynas. 1987. Descripcion de Ia larva
de Ehhistocleis bicoiur (Valenciennes 1838)(Anura: Microhylidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 8:225-229.
Wiiliams, M. A., and L. D. Smith. 1971. Ultrastructure of the
"germinal plasm" during maturation and early cleavage in
Rana pipiens. Dmelop. Biol. 25 :568-580.
Wiiliamson, I., and C. M. Buli. 1989. Life history variation in a
population of the frog Ranihlia signifera: Egg size and early
development. Copeia 1989:349-356.
Wfi, I. A. 1936. The respiratory rate of developing Amphibia
with special referente to sex differentiation. J. Exp. Zool.
73:481-510.
Wiison, D. J., and H. Lefcort. 1993. The effect of predator diet
on the alarm response of red-legged frog, Rana auria, tadpoles. Anim. Behav. 46: 1017-1019.
Wiison, L. D., and J. R. McCranie. 1993. Preliminq key to
the known tadpoles of anurans from Honduras. Life Sci. Octas. Pap. Roy. Ontario Mus. (40):1-12.
Wiitshire, D. J., and C. M. Buli. 1977. Potential competitive interactions between larvae of Pseztdophryne bibrmi and Ei semim a m r a t a (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Australian J. Zool.
25 :449454.
Wimberger, P. H. 1992. Plasticity of fish body shape. The
effects of diet, development, family, and age in two species
of Geophagus (lJisces: Cichlidae). Bwl. J. Linnean Soc.
45:197-218.
. 1993. Effects of vitamin C deficiency on body shape
and skuil osteology in Geophgus brrasiliensis: Implications for
interpretations of morphological plasticity. Copeia
1993:343-351.
Wmklbauer, R., and P. Hausen. 1983a. Development of the lateral line system inXenopuslaePis. I. Normal development and
ceil movement in the supraorbital system. J. Embryol. Exp.
Mophol. 76:265-28 1.
. 1983b. Development of the lateral line system inXempus hm-is. 11. Cell multiplication and organ formation in
the supraorbital system. J. Embryol Exp. Mmphol. 76:283296.
. 1985a. Development of the lateral line system inXenopus hm-is. 111. Development of the supraorbital system in
triploid embryos and larvae. J. Embryol. Exp. Molphol.
88: 183-192.
. 1985b. Development of the lateral line system inXenopus W .TV. Pattern formation in the supraorbital system.
J. Embryol. Exp. Molphol. 88: 193-207.
Wischnitzer, S. 1976. The lampbmsh chromosomes: Their
LITERATURE CITED
417
418
LITERATURE CITED
the in situ epithelia of larval Caudiverbera cuudiverbera (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Alytes 12:135-144.
Zettergren, L. D., H. Kubugawa, and M. D. Cooper. 1980. Development of B-celis in Ranapipiens. pp. 177-185. In Phy[ogeny of immunology meviwy, edited by M. J. Manning. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Hoiiand.
Zimmerman, H., and E. Zimmerman. 1981. Socialverhalten,
Fortpflanzungsverhaltenund Zucht der Firberfrosche Dendrobates histrionicus und D. lehmanni sowie einiger anderer
Dendrobatiden.Zeit. Kohlner Zoo 24:83-99.
Zst, B., and K. E. Dixon. 1975. The effect of W irradiation
of the vegetal pole ofxenupusl m i eggs on the presumptive
primordial gerrn ceiis.J Embyol. Exp. Morphol. 34:209-220.
. 1977. Events in the germ celi lineage after entry of the
primordial germ ceiis into the genital ridges in normal and
u.v.-irradiated Xencrpus l m i . J Embyol. Exp. Mmphol.
41:3346.
AUTHOR INDEX
294'
Alford, S. T., 155
Ai Johari, G. M., 24
Aiiey, K. E., 159
Allison, J. D., 161
Ai-Mukthar, K. A. K., 140, 144
Altig, R., 3, 5, 9, 12, 13-14, 16,
17, 18, 19,25,26, 27, 30,
31, 34, 35,36, 37, 38,40,
42, 44,45,46,47,48,49,
50, 63,67, 79, 82,85, 87,
170, 173,178, 184,186,
201,216, 219, 221,227,
228, 229, 231,237, 238,
244,245,248,263,267,
268,280,290,292,296,
297,298,299, 300,302,
303, 305, 307, 308, 309,
310, 321, 326, 339, 340,
342,343,344,345,346,
347
Altman, J. S., 158, 164
Aivarado, R. H., 104, 106, 136,
210,211,212,213
Amboroso, E. C., 171
Amer, F. I., 142, 144
Amiet, J.-L., 5,27,248, 301,
312,313,348
Amos, W., 217
Anderson, J. D., 237
Andrn, C., 21,260,266
Andres, G., 105
Andres, K. H., 165
Andrews, R. M., 171
Angel, F., 296, 334
Anholt, B., 18
Anholt, B. R., 223, 238,253
Annandaie, N., 19,27,41,44,
228,297,298,329,330
Anstis, M., 37; 41
Antal, M., 154, 155
Archey, G., 173
Am~strong,J. B., 21
Arnauld, E., 138
Arnold, E. hT.,184, 296,334
Arnold, S. J., 79, 206,219,232,
260
Arnoult, J., 297,312,327,332
Arrayago, M.-J., 171
Arthur, W., 171
Aschoff, L., 97
Ashby, K R., 229
Ashley, H., 132
Atkinson, B. G., 106, 132, 190,
191,197
Atoda, K., 178, 180, 181
Attas, E. M., 18
Atweii, W. J, 145
Auburn, J. S., 238
Audo, M. C., 282,283
Augert, D., 235,251
Axelsson, E., 200
Azevedo-Ramos, C., 238
Babalian, A. L., 155
Babbitt, K. J., 226, 263
Baccari, G. C., 29
Bachmann, K., 202
Bacon, J. P., Jr., 200
Baculi, B. S., 101
Bagenal, T. B., 18
Bagnara, J. T., 30, 104, 105,
168,344
Bailey, C. H., 167
Baker, C. L, 197
Baker, G. C., 253
Baiasubramanian, S., 216, 247
Baidwin, G. P., 106
Balinsky, B. I., 24, 28, 104, 105,
106,121,131,140,189
Baiinsky, J. B., 132, 142
Banks, B., 242
Bantle, J. A., 16, 18
Barandun, J., 252
Barbault, R., 182
Barch, S. H., 138
Bard, K. M., 219
Bardsley, L., 271
Bargmann, W., 135, 140
Barker, J., 310
Barker, S. B., 212
Birlcher, E, 241
Bames, M. D., 159
Barreto, L., 200
Barrington, E. J. W., 123, 127,
129,269
Barrio, A., 316
Barry, T. H., 56,60
Basoglu, M., 296
Basso, N. G., 34, 327
Basu, S. L., 142, 144, 145
Bateson, P., 237
Battaglini, P., 248
Baaen, T. F. C., 145
Bauer, A. M., 296
Bavay, A., 171
420
Beach, D. H., 168
Beachy, C. K., 251, 282
Beaumont, A., 42, 106, 132, 146
Beazley, L. D., 168
Beck, C. W., 171, 250,251,282,
284
Beckenbach, A. T., 192
Beckvar, N., 223, 244,292
Beddard, F. E., 79
Beebee, T. J. C., 21, 213,242,
248,253,255,261,271
Beigl, I., 142, 144
Beiswenger, R E., 203, 207,
208,216,229,230, 232,
236,260
Bell, B. D., 173, 180
Belloy Espinosa, D., 171
Belova, Z. A., 247
Bemelmans, S. E., 155
Benbassat, J., 97
Bennett, A. F., 194, 195
Benninghoff, A., 93
Benson, D. G., Jr., 20
Benson, W. W., 236
Bentley, P. J., 106, 132, 136, 198
Bernardini, G., 144
Bernasconi, A. E, 77
Berninghausen, F., 296
Bems, M. W, 21
Berry, P. Y., 31,41, 174, 296,
303,318,334
Berton, J.-P., 140
Bertram, B. C. R., 232
Berven, K. A,, 204, 205, 208,
209, 229,243,251,252,
257, 280, 281,283, 285,
286,288,293
Bhaduri, J. L., 142, 144, 145,
323
Bhalla, S. C., 237
Bider, J. R., 260
Bigaj, J., 135, 136
Binckiey, C. A., 18
Birks, R., 149
Bishop, J. E., 269
Bixby, J. L., 154
Black, D., 150
Black, I. H., 41,203,205,213,
260
Black, J. H., 221
Blackburn, D. G., 170
Blackier, A. W., 143, 144
Blair, W. F., 267
Blanc, C. P., 296, 312, 320, 323,
332
Blaustein, A. R., 209,229, 230,
231,232,233,234,235,
236,237,238, 253,259,
261
Blaustein, L., 242,243,252,
273,275
Bleakney, S., 247
Blight, A. R., 158,226
Blommers, I,. H. M., 228,267
Blommers-Schlosser,R. M., 34,
174, 175, 180,228,267,
296,312,320,323, 332
Blouin, M. S., 243,258,286,
288,292,293,294
Boas, J. E. V, 107
Boatright-Horowia, S. S., 162
AUTHOR INDEX
Bobka, M. S., 243,263
Bogart, J. P., 170,290,297
Bogett, C. M., 202
Bokermann, W. C. A., 5,8, 309,
310,315
Bolt, J. R., 288, 290, 292
Boni, P., 248
Boonkoom, V, 106,212
Boord, R. L., 163, 164
Booth, D. T., 196,223
Boothby, K. M., 225
Bork, T., 168
Borkhvardt, V G., 25
Borland, J. R., 22
Bossard, H. J., 132
Boulenger, G. A., 4, 35, 50, 179,
180, 296, 298, 302, 306,
325,326,331,334
Bourne, G. R., 171
Bournoure, L., 143
Bourquin, O., 187
Bourret, R., 5,296, 332
Boutilier, R. G., 197,201
Bowen, S. H., 246,247,268
Boycott, R. C., 328
Bradford, D. F., 21, 181, 192,
194, 195, 203,207, 211,
212,229, 240, 249,260,
263,264
Bradley, L., 34
Bragg, A. N., 12, 21,27,40,41,
218,229,230
Bragg, W. N., 40,41
Braitenburg, V, 161
Branch, L. C., 232
Brandon, R. A,, 5,296
Brandt, F. H., 248
Brattstrom, B. H., 204, 205,
206.207.208,224,225,
229,237'
Brauer. A.. 229. 296
Braus,'~.:25 '
Breden, F., 232,258
Breed, W. J., 22 1
Bregman, B. S., 155
Bresler, J., 21,40, 41
Bricout-Berthout,A., 163
Bridges, C. M., 253
Briggs, R., 21
Brink, H. E., 182
Britson, C. A., 200, 246
Brock, G. T., 24, 80
Brockelman, W. Y., 252
Brodie, E. D., 111, 236,237
Brodie, E. D., Jr., 30,49, 85,
211,227,229,232, 236,
243, 251, 260,261,262,
346
Bronmark, C., 226,273,302
Brook, A. J., 267
Browder, L. W., 189
Brown, C. A., 123, 152
Brown, D., 104
Brown, D. R., 154
Brown, F. A., Jr., 209
Brown, H. A., 202,203,206,
208,209,302
Brown, L. E., 245,246
Brown, R. M., 239
Brown, S. C., 210,211,212
Brown, T. E., 213
42 1
A U T H O R INDEX
Crespo, E., 295
Cronin, J. T., 262
Crossland, M. R., 218,246,247
Crowder, W. C., 21, 193, 194,
197,198,199,200
Cmce, W L. R., 155, 160
Crump, M. L., 23, 172, 184,
206,208,211,217,218,
219,232,242,244,246,
247,249,251,262,265,
266,268,303
Cuellar, H. S., 321,322
Cuiien, M. J., 168
Cuey, D. D., Jr., 245,247
Cummins, C. I?, 21,249,260
Cupp, P. V, Jr., 203,204,205,
206,207,224
Curtis, S. K., 103
Cusimano-Carollo,T., 35,45
Czechura, G. V, 297
Czh, G., 154
Czolowska, R., 143
Da Cniz, C. A. G., 303,308,
310,311,314,321
Dainton, B. H., 205
Daniel, J. C., 323
Daniel, J. E, 16
Danos, S. O., 221
DarneU, R. M., Jr., 197
Das, I., 107
Das, S. K., 77
d'hcanio, E, 155
Dash, M. C., 245,246, 256, 258
Daua, M., 131, 138
Davenpoa, C. B., 203
Davidson, E. H., 24
Davidson, M., 21
Davies, M., 34, 55, 175, 297,
310,324
Davis, M. R, 153
Davis, W. M., 151
Dawes, E. A., 158, 164
Dawson, J. T., 232,233,235
Dawson, W. R., 194
De Albuja, C. M., 175
De Arajo, M. C., 217
De Bavay, J. M., 174
De Beer, G. R., 55, 56, 59,61,
63,88
DeBenedictis, P. A., 235, 236,
273
De Boer-Van Huizen, R, 155
Debski, E. A,, 160
De Capona, M.-D. C., 312
De Carvalho, A. L., 5, 9,28,31,
33, 37,41,50,296,323
De Carvalho e Silva, S. P., 171
De Cerasuolo,A. M., 181
Decker, R. S., 154
Degani, G., 210,223,269
De Gueldre, G., 168
DeHaan, R L., 93
De Jongh, H. J., 24, 53, 56,58,
61,66,67,68,69, 70, 75,
81,82, 84,216
De Lahunta, A,, 153
De Ia Riva, I., 56, 315
Delbos, M., 135, 137, 140, 143
Deffino, G., 105
Deiidow, B. C., 249
185, 190,206,207,215,
216,220,229, 230,265,
267,290,291,296,299,
300, 304, 305, 307, 308,
309, 310, 311, 314, 316,
321
Dugs, A., 4, 53, 55, 107
Duke, J. T., 192, 193, 196, 198
Duke, K L., 144
Dumas, P. C., 270
Duncan, J. T., 93
Dunham, A. E., 243
Dunlap, D. G., 29,237
Dunlop, S. A., 168
Dunn, E. R, 41,187,308
Dunn, R. F., 163
Dunson, W. A,, 202,203,211,
212,213,214,229,241,
249,267
Du Pasquier, L., 104
Dupr, R. K., 199,203,205,
206,224,238,260
Dutta, S. K., 50
Dziadek, M., 143
Dzieduszycka, S., 328
Eakin, R. M., 34, 145
Eaton, R. C., 158
Eaton, T. H., 288, 290
Ebbesson, S. O. E., 152, 154,
155, 156, 157, 158, 159,
160
Ebenman, B., 243
Eberhard, M. L., 248
Echeverra, D. D., 5, 25,40,45,
50,107,109,144
Eddy, E. M., 140,143
Edelman, A., 255
Edenhamm, E, 226
Edgeworth, F. H., 53, 55,67,
68,69, 70, 72, 74, 75, 76,
77
..
Edwards, M. L. O., 21
Egami, N., 140,143
Ehmann, H., 175
Ehrl, A., 175, 326
Eichler, V B., 154
Eiger, S. M., 205,214,224
Eiselt, J., 60
Eisworth, L. M., 164
Ekblom, P., 138
Ekman, G., 93, 115
Eldred, W. D., 168
Elepfandt, A., 160,164
Elias, H., 30,104
Elinson, E. E, 29,34, 172, 175,
177, 178, 179, 181, 182,
184,186,188
Emerson, S. B., 67,292,293,
294
Emlet, R. R., 171
Engel, W., 144
Engels, H. G., 136, 138
Engermann, W.-E., 296
Epple, A., 145
Erasmus, B. de W, 201
Erdmann, R., 93
Escher, K., 163
Escobar, B., 171, 172, 175, 178,
180
Estes, R., 3
Estrada, A. R, 172
Etkin, W., 9, 145, 180, 191,
208,346
Exbrayat, J. M., 182
Faber, J., 8, 33, 53, 70, 77,92,
93, 131, 136, 137, 145,
146,147,327
Fabrezi, M., 55, 56
Faier, J. M., 35,49
Faivovich, J., 27, 247, 297, 314,
334
Falconer, D. S., 284,286,287,
289,291,293
Fang, H., 182
Fanning, S. A., 296
Faragher, S. G., 240
Farel, P. B., 153, 155,226
Farlowe, V, 223, 247
Farrar, E. S., 146
Farrell, A. P., 93
Farris, J. S., 5, 9, 50, 296
Fauth; J. E., 254,274,275
Fawcett, D. W., 142
Feder, M. E., 88, 191, 192, 193,
194, 195, 196, 197, 199,
200,209,223,224,225,
226,243,261
Fei, L., 319
Feinsinger, P., 248
Felsenstein, J., 87
Feminella, J. W., 261
Feng, A. S., 159, 160, 161, 163
Fenster, D., 255
Ferguson, D. E., 168
Fennin, E, 171
Fernndez, K., 5
Fernndez, M., 5
Fernndez-Marcinowski, K., 5
Ferns, M. J., 155
Ferrari, L., 210
Fetter, R. D., 166
Figge, F. H. J., 197
Figiel, C. R, Jr., 261
Filipello, A. M., 40
Filipski, G. T., 18
Fink, W. L., 171, 188
~ i o n t ode Lopez, L. E., 45, 50,
107
Fisher, K C., 203,205
Fisher, M. D., 160
Fisher, R A,, 236
Fishwild, T. G., 233, 234, 235,
236
Fite, K. V, 160, 161, 162, 166
Flatin, J., 93
Fletcher, K., 191
Flock, A., 163, 164
Flores-Nava, A,, 21, 22
Flower, S. S., 297
Floyd, R B., 202,203,204,
205,206,207,260
Ford, L. S., 6, 52, 53, 54,61,
63,77,90
Ford, T. D., 221
Forehaiid, C. J., 153
Forge, P., 182
Forman, L. J., 97
Formanowicz, D. R., Jr., 30,
171, 211, 232, 236,243,
251,260,261,262,263
422
Formas, J. R, 5, 174, 179,227,
316,317,318,334
Forunan, J. R., 50
Foster, M. S., 201, 230, 231
Foster, R. G., 162, 168
Foster, S. A,, 191
Fouquette, M. J., Jr., 308
Fox, H., 72, 104, 105, 107, 119,
121, 123, 125, 129, 131,
132, 133, 135, 136, 137,
146,238,288,346
Foxon, G. E. H., 97, 135
Franchi, L. L., 144
Francis, M. G.. 200,260
Frank, B. D., 167
Frank, E., 155
Frank, G., 96, 103, 104, 135,
136
Frankino, W. A., 247
Fraser, E. A., 132
Freda, J., 211,212,213,214
Freeman, J. A,, 159
Frieden, E., 97, 129
Friedman, B.. 158
Fnedman, R. T., 104
Friet, S. C., 195
Fritsche, R., 93, 214
Fritzsch, B., 158, 162, 163, 164
Frogner, K. J., 31,322
Frohiich, J., 104
Frost, D. R., 27, 172,298
Frost, J. S., 331
Frost, S. K., 30
Frye, B. E., 146
Fujisawa, H., 160
Fder, P. M., 158
Funkhouser, A., 191,210
Gale, E. A,, 28, 184
G d , J. G., 142, 175
Gdardo, J. M., 29
Gdien, L., 92, 132
Gans, C., 168
Garca, G., 55, 56
Gardener, L. W., 137
Gardiner, J., 6
Gam, R, 104
Gascon, C., 20, 260, 262, 265,
266,275,302
Gates, W. R., 50
Gatherer, D., 177
Gatten, R. E., Jr., 191,192, 193,
194,195,209
Gaupp, E., 53,56
Gavasso, S., 238,263
Gavrila, L., 247
Gaze, R M., 160, 167
Gee, J. H., 224
Gegenbaur, K., 115
Gehrau, A., 317
Grard, P., 135, 136, 138
Gerhardt, E., 104, 115
Gerschenfeld, H. M., 162
Gesner, C. von, 3
Geyer, G., 140
Ghate, H. V, 260,263
Giarretta, A. A,, 309, 315
Gibbons, J. W., 262,264
Gibley, C. W., Jr., 135
Giesel, J. T., 171
Giies, M. A., 18
A U T H O R INDEX
Gi, D. E., 180,208,209, 272,
280,291
Giliiam, J. F., 243, 269
Gines, H., 326
Giorgi, P. i?,137, 143
Gipouloux, J.-D., 92, 132, 137,
138,143
Girard, C., 137, 143
Gitlin, D., 174, 175
Glaw, R., 174, 296, 320,323,
332
Gluecksohn-Waelsch, S., 171
Goater, C. P., 243, 248
Godinho, H. P., 204
Goette,A., 55,93,107,112,115
Goicoechea, O., 184
Goin, C. J., 3, 175, 178
Goin, O. B., 3
Goldacre, R. J., 221
Golden, D. W., 95
Goiichenkov, V A., 104
Gollman, B., 2, 34, 181, 229,
259,295
Goiiman, G., 2,34, 181,229,
259,295
Gomez, M., 132, 252
Gona, A. G., 159
Goniakowska-Witalnska, L.,
106,107
Gonzaiez, A., 154,159
Goodyear, C. P., 238
Gordon, F. J., 12
Gordon, J., 167
Gordon, M. S., 132,210,213
Gorham, E., 213
Gorlick, D. L., 150
Gorner, P., 164
G o r d a , S., 173, 303
Gosner, K. L., 8, 10-11, 12,28,
41,42,49, 50, 53,92, 131,
142, 143,144,145,171,
178, 189,202,203,205,
213,215, 240, 260, 281,
339,340,343,345,347
Gotte, S. W., 23
Gouras, P., 167
Gradweli, N., 38,40,48, 49, 53,
55,56,57, 58,63,64,65,
68, 69, 70, 71,72, 73, 74,
75,80, 81,82,83,84,85,
86, 87, 88,90, 109, 112,
113,119,121, 198,216
Grafen, A,, 235
Graham, J. B., 201
Grandison, A. G. C., 28,50,
173,182,240,303,304
Grant, P., 167, 168
Grant, S., 168
Grass, P.-P., 142
Grassi Milano, E., 145, 147
Gray, E. G., 168
Gray, J., 226
Gray, P., 138, 172, 173, 180,
184,307
Graybeai, A., 90, 304
Graziadei, P. P. C., 165
Green, N. B., 297
Greenwald, D. J., 136
Greenwood, P. J., 236
Greii, A., 115
Greven, H., 121
H a d , D. L., 293
Harvey, I. F., 261
Harvey, J. M., 210,260
Harvey, P. H., 88, 236
Hassinger, D. D., 235,236
Hastings, D., 209
Hathaway, E. S., 204
Hausen, P., 165
Hauser, K. F., 149, 159
Havenhand, J. N., 171
Hawkins, C. P., 261
Hay, J. M., 54,90
Hayes, B. P., 238
Hayes, L., 262
Hayes, S., 41
Hayes, T. B., 105, 146,249
Hazard, E. S., 111, 190
Hearnden, M. N., 242,247,276
Heasman, J., 143, 144
Heathcote, R. D., 152
Heatwole, H., 174, 203,204
Hedrick, J. L., 34
Hegner, R. W., 21,248
Heisler, N., 201
Heiff, O. M., 107, 110,112,
194,201
EIenderson, R. W., 173, 174
Hendricks, F. S., 223,247
Hendrickson, A. E., 168
Hendrickson, J. R., 221
Hennen, S., 143
Henrickson, B.-I., 260, 261,262
Hensley, F. R., 250,281,282,
283,284
Hero, J.-M., 246, 247,262,265,
267,291,296,309,325
Hron-Royer, 3 , 4 , 4 9
Herreid, C. F., 11,229, 251,260
Herrick, C. J., 158, 159, 160,
161
Hessler, C. M., 230, 231
Hetherington, T. E., 59, 60, 302
Heusser, H., 27,218,246, 247
Hewitt, J., 298
Hews, D. K., 236,238,243,
253,261,262
Heyer, W. R., 5,27,44,48,49,
107, 109, 111, 112, 113,
121, 173, 182, 196,200,
216, 223,227, 228,240,
247, 262,265,267,268,
296, 305, 307,309,310,
311, 315, 316, 317, 322,
332
Hibiya, T., 121
Higgins, G. M., 58
Hildrew, A. G., 48
Hill, C. G., 203,205,206,260
Hill, S., 57
Hdis, D. M., 34, 297, 331
Hlllman, D. E., 166
Hinckley, M. H., 4
Hirakow, R., 93
Hird, D. W., 248
Hirsch, G. C., 138
Hisaoka, K. K., 21
Hlastala, M. P., 196
Hochachka, P. W., 192
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., 171
Hoff, K., 5,48, 55, 56, 57, 87,
88,91, 109, 119,216,219,
A U T H O R INDEX
224,225,226,239, 243,
288
Hohann, M. H., 160
Hokit, D. G., 229,231,237,
253,259
Holder, N. J., 153
Holley, A., 160
Hoiiyfxld, J. G., 97, 135, 167
Holomuzki, J. R., 248
Honda, E., 110
Honegger, R. E., 314
Hood, D. C., 167
Hoogmoed, M. S., 179,311
Hoppe, D. M., 202,203,204,
205
Hora, S. L., 27
Horat, E, 243
Honuchi, T., 245
Horseman, N. D., 247
Hoaon, J. D., 97, 100, 101,
103,135,136
Hoaon, P., 142
Hoskins, S. G., 167
Hosoi, M., 49
Hota, A. K., 246,256,258
Houillon, C., 92, 132
H o u r h J., 21, 104, 131, 182,
188,254
Honrer, R. O., 17
Hoyer, M. H., 101
Hoyer, W. J., 239
Hoyt, J. A., 58
Hraouibloquet, S., 182
Hrbiek, J., 236
Hsu, C.-Y., 144
Hu. S. Q., 319,320, 330
Huber, I., 237
Huey, R. B., 204,205,209,261
Hughes, A., 29, 154,155,168,
180,181,182,227
Hulsebus, J., 146
Humphries, A. A,, Jr., 175
Hurley, M. B., 135, 137
Huxhke, E., 107
Hutchinson, T.. 3, 6, 203,204
Hutchison, V H., 190, 205,
206,209,260
Hudey, T. H., 62
I a d o , J. M., 93
I&y-Oka,
A., 127, 130
Ideker, J., 261
Ij.K. L., 140, 143
ikenishi, K., 143
In,w,R F., 5,6,9, 20,25,27,
29, 30, 33, 35, 41, 45,46,
48,49,50, 109, 123, 175,
182, 184, 190,216,223,
227,229, 240,269,279,
295,296,297, 298, 302,
303, 304, 318, 319,320,
321, 322, 328, 329, 330,
331,333,334
wennan, R. L., 171
hgie, D., 168,237,239
iqieron, P. M., 145
hpm,G . J., 187
lngram, V. M., 96,97,190,191
Iwhchi, T., 125
Iranova, N. L., 21, 247
Lshizuya-Oka, A., 127
Ison, R. E., 94
Istock, C. A,, 292, 293,294
Ito, S., 140
Iwasawa, H., 138,140,142,
143,144,145
Izecksohn, E., 5, 30, 174, 303,
310,311,314
Izquierdo, L., 317
Jablonski, D., 294
Jackson, D. C., 201
Jackson, G. D., 26,248
Jackson, J. F., 254, 3 14
Jacobson, A. G., 93
Jacobson, C. M., 55
Jacobson, M., 168
Jacoby, J., 158, 164
Jaeger, C. B., 166
Jaeger, R. G., 167, 237,240,
254
JaEee, O. C., 133, 135
Bgersten, G., 290
James, V G., 22
Jameson, D. L., 173, 180
Jande, S. S., 163
Janes, R. G., 129
Janies, D. A,, 9
Jasienski, M., 237,259
Jaslow, A. P.. 162
Jayatilaka, A. D. P., 146
Jennings, D. H., 182
Jennings, R. D., 28,29, 295,
297,331
Jensen, F. B., 216
Jenssen, T. A,, 223,247
Jia, X. X., 196
Jiang, T., 160
Johansen, K., 190
Jolui, K. R., 255
John-Alder,H. B., 243
Jolmson, D. S., 213
Jolmson, E. A,, 271,275
Johnson, S. R., 136
Johnston, G. F., 5,9, 12, 13-14,
19, 27, 31, 34,40,42,44,
48,49, 50,63,82, 87, 170,
173, 184, 186, 216,227,
228,244,280,290,297,
298,299,300,342,344,
345,346,348
Johnston, L. M., 223,247
Jolivet-Jaudet, G., 147
Joliie, M., 72, 74
Joly, E, 235,251
Jonas, L., 135
Jones, R. E., 172
Jones, R. M., 132
Jargensen, C. B., 140
Jordan, F., 226,263
Jordan, H. E., 97
Jorquera, B., 131, 175, 181, 317
Joseph, B. S., 154, 159
Junc, F. A., 173, 178, 184
Jungfer, K.-H., 217, 219, 220,
247
Junqueira, L. C. U., 104
Jurgens, J. D., 58
Just, J. J., 97, 106, 136, 190,
191, 197, 201, 208,210,
25 1
Justis, C. S., 168, 238
Kahn, T., 5 1
Kaiser, H., 173, 178, 184, 305
Kalt, M. R., 140, 142, 143
Kam, Y.-C., 217,219, 332
Kamat, N. D., 223
Kamel, S., 243,251
Kamimura, M., 143
Kamprneier, O. F., 101
Kanamadi, R D., 143
Kaplan, M., 41
Kaplan, R. H., 225,246,253,
258,261
Karlson, P., 132
Karlstrom, E. L., 203,204
Karnovsky, M. J., 16
Kartn, I., 237
Kashin, S., 226
Kasinathan, S., 143
Katagiri, C., 34
Kats, L. B., 240, 260, 263,
264
Katz, L. C., 230,231
Katz, M. J., 280
Kaufn~ann,T. C., 188
Kaung, H. C., 42, 46, 48, 146
Kawada, J., 212
Kdwai, A., 104
Kawamura, T., 50
Keating, M. J., 160, 168
Kehr, A. I., 34,250,257,262,
269,296,327
Keiffer, H., 4
Keiier, R., 24
Kelley, D. B., 150
Keiiy, C. H., 258
Kelly, D. E., 168
Kelly, J. P., 244
Kernali, M., 160, 161, 165
Kemp, A., 16
Kemp, N. E., 58,130
Kermy, J. S., 49, 56, 80, 81, 84,
109, 112, 113, 216,243,
244,327
Kenward, R. E., 232
Kerr, J. B., 142, 143
Kerr, J. G., 115, 129
Kessel, R. G., 24, 34, 143
Kesteven, H. L., 55
Kett, N. A., 155
Khan, M. S., 12, 15, 21, 41,44,
109,296
Khare, M. K., 223
Kiditer, E., 156, 160, 162
Kiesecker, J., 260
Kilham, P., 213
Kindahl, M., 135, 138
Kindred, J. E., 119
King, M., 310
Kingsbury, B. F., 163
Kinney, E. C., 213
Kinney, S., 229, 260
Kinoshita, T., 92
Kirtisinghe, P., 31. 44, 322, 323,
330
Kiseleva, E. I., 238
Kisseii, R. E., Jr., 200, 246
Kisteumacher, G., 315
Kiein, S. L., 165
Kiimek, M., 247
Kiuge, A. G., 5,9, 50,90,205,
296
423
Kluger, M. J., 209
Kiymkowsky, M. W., 17
Knudson, C. M., 95, 135
Kobayashi, M., 50, 140, 142,
144
Kok, D., 219,231
Koilros, J. J., 8,9,42,46,48,
92,94, 151, 159, 160, 166,
168, 189, 194, 198, 224,
229,281,288
Kopsch, F., 53, 64, 127
Korky, J. K., 40,41,49,295,
297,339
Koshida, Y., 245
Koskela, P., 240
Kotani, M., 143
Kothbauer, H., 229
Kotler, B. P., 242
Kotthaus, A., 55
Kraemer, M., 55, 59,61
Kramer, D. L., 201
Kramer, H., 20
Kratochwill, K., 56, 81, 84, 107,
112,113
Kress, A., 140
f i g e l , P., 21, 174
Krujitzer, E. M., 55
Kruse, K. C., 200,260
Ku, S. H., 137
Kubin, T. M., 309
Kunst, J., 136, 138
Kunte, K., 228
Kuna, A., 125
Kmle, H., 154
Kupferberg, S. J., 238,243, 244,
245, 248,253, 263,270,
273
Kuramoto, M., 332
Kuthe, K. S. M., 216
Kuzmin, S. L., 243
Lainson, R., 248
Laird, A. K., 280
Lajmanovich, R C., 216,247
Lamar, W. W., 315
La Marca, E., 297, 306
Lamb, A. H., 155
Lambem, G. A., 248
Lambiris,A. J.L.,28, 179, 181,
296,306
Lamborghni, J. E., 154
Lametschwandtner,A., 28,93,
138,140
Larnotte, M., 5, 9, 35, 140, 142,
144, 173, 179, 181, 183,
254,297, 301, 312, 313,
323, 326, 327, 328, 329,
331,333,334
Lancaster, J., 48
Lande, R, 285
Langone, J. A., 31,34,303
Lannoo,M. J., 5, 18,27, 88,
107, 112, 113, 121, 163,
164. 198, 217. 227.. 237,.
238; 240; 308'
Lanza, B., 296,302,306, 325,
326,331,334
Largen, M. J., 313
Larseii, O., 158, 159, 163
Larson, P., 91
Larson-Prior,L. J., 160
424
Lataste, F., 4
Latsis, R. V., 135
Lauder, G. V., 90,288
Laurens, H., 237
Laurila, A,, 253,266
Laviiia,E. 0.,5,9,27,31,34,
37,41, 55, 56, 57,91,295,
298,318,321,327,346
Lawler, K. L., 262
Lawler, S. P., 243,263,275, 276
Lawson, D. P., 28,228,301
Lzr,G. Y., 160
Leaf, A., 136
Lebedinskaya, I. I., 28
Lee, A. K., 324
Lee, J. C., 12, 298
Lee, R. K. K., 158
Lefcoa, H. G., 205,209,214,
224,238,253
Leibovitz, H. E., 21,247
Leimberger, J. D., 264
Leips, J., 250,281,282,283,
284
Leloup-Hatey, J., 147
Lemckea, F., 207
Lenfant, C., 190
Leon-Ochoa,J., 316
Le Quang Trong, Y., 104
Lescure, J., 5,9,35, 183,215,
230,306,308
Leucht, T., 238
Levine, R. L., 160
Lewinson, D., 121
Lewis, E. R., 162, 163
Lewis, M. A., 194
Lewis, S., 159,208
Lewis, T. L., 145
Lewis, W. M., Jr., 201
Lewontin, R. C., 237
Leydig, E, 4, 104
Li, J. C., 245
Licht, L. E., 252,256,260,272
Licht, P., 105, 195
Lieberkund, I., 24,34
Liern, K. F., 29, 30, 149
Ligname, A. H., 15
L i e , R. D., 20
Liiiywhite, H. B., 202,204,205,
207
Lima, A. P., 265
Limbaugh, B. A., 50
Lin, C. S., 245
Lin, J.-Y., 5, 296, 322
Lin, W., 159,160
Lindquist, E. D., 302
Ling, R. w., 210
Linsenmair, K. E., 238,261
Linss, W., 140
Lips, K. R., 21,296
List, J. C., 21, 58, 78
Little, G. H., 132
Littlejohn, M. J., 5, 174, 179,
325
Liu, C.-C., 5,9,296,297,298,
319,320,322,330
.
.
Liu, H., 27
Lofts. B.. 140. 142. 144
Lombard, R ., 162,163
Loor-Vela, S., 177
Lopez, K., 140, 142, 143, 144,
145
AUTHOR I N D E X
Lopez, P. T., 227
Loschenkohl, A., 223,269
b m p , S., 34, 105, 191, 197
Lowe, D. A., 151,160,164
Lucas, E. A., 203,205,206,
207,260
Luckenbiil, L. M., 42,46,48,49
Ludwig, D., 251,282
Lugand, A., 181, 184
Lum, A. M., 164,238
Luna, L. G., 20
Luther, A., 55,68
Lua, B., 170, 174, 179,180,
229,290,291
Lyapkov, S. M., 215
Lynch, J. D., 41, 50,90,302
Lynch, K., 25
Lynn, W. G., 55, 172, 174, 178,
180,181,182,188,255
Macgregor, H. C., 172
Mackay, W. C., 211
Maeda, N., 5,296,332
Maetz, J., 104
Maglia, A. M., 55
Magnin, E., 55
Magnusson, W. E., 246,247,
265,291
Mahapatro, B. K., 246,258
Maher, S. W., 221
Main, A. R., 202,324
Majecka, K., 267
Majecki, J., 267
Malacinski, G. M., 21
Maiashichev, Y. B., 25
Maiik, S. A., 109
Maione, B. S., 183
Malvin, G. M., 196,197
Manahan, D. T., 184
Maness, J. D., 173,204,206,
209
Maness, S. J., 172
Mangia, F., 96
Mangold, O., 115
Maniatis, G. M., 96,97
Manis, M. L., 203, 204
Mann, R., 18
Mannen. H.. 153
~ a n n i n gM
, . J., 24,97, 100,
101,103,136
Manteifel. Y. B.. 238., 253., 263
~ a n t e k lG.,
, 237
Marcus, E., 104, 115
Marcus, H., 115
Marescakhi, O., 142, 144
Margalit, J., 242,243,252,273,
275
Marian, M. P., 199,208, 209,
224,251,283
Marie, Sister Ared De, 182
Marinelli, M., 45
Maritz, M. F., 26
Marks, J. C., 294
Marlier, G., 213
Marrot, B., 92
Marshall, E., 209,260
Marshall, G. A., 21,247
Martin, A. A., 5, 132, 181, 183,
185,296,310,323,324,
325,334
Martin, M. S., 92
A U T H O R INDEX
Xr J., 190,198,200
S i i e n h u y s , R., 156, 157,
158,159,160
X ~ ~ ~ - k o o p , P . D . , 8 ,34,53,
33,
70, 77,92,93, 106, 131,
136, 137, 145, 146, 147,
296,327
Siiq-asova, E. N., 104
S i i d i w e , A. M., 157,158,
139,160
\-in, G., 266
S
i
m H. L., 175
Siiiukawa, A,, 25
S s h h w a , K . C.,79, 150, 153,
134,226
S d m a r a , M., 246
Soble, G. K, 5,27,29, 34, 38,
42,50,62,68,71, 74,75,
85. 89, 179, 180,228, 229,
288,290,296,320
Soden. D. M., 153, 164
S&nski, E., 25,45,46,48,
50,135,144,182,196,245
Sdan4 R, 192,193,194, 197,
199,200,203,205,207,
209,260
S d e r t , A., 296,334
S d e r t , C., 296, 334
S o m q S., 107,110
Sordlander, R. H., 150, 153,
155,158
Sorthcutt, R. G., 121, 158, 160,
161,162,165
sassai, G. J. v, 97
S o a ogrodzka-Zagrska, M.,
166
Sunnemacher, R. F., 151, 153
S ~ m a nS.,
, 248
Odendaal, F. J., 269, 270
Ogjeiska, M., 140,142,144,
145
OXara, R. K., 229,230,231,
232,233,234,235,236,
237
Ohler. &I.,
40
Ohrani, O., 140
Ohzu. E., 34
Ok Y., 152, 154, 157
Olrada, Y., 5,296,332
O ~ V.,
L 248
Ohitomi, K., 57
OLughlin, B. E., 282
Okiharn, R S., 227,228
O k a G. J., 70
O h n , D. H., 20,232
Omerza, F. F., 159
Opatm!; E., 221
Opdam, P., 156, 157, 158, 159
Orlando, K., 197
Orr. P. R, 204
Orron.G.L.,5,6,9,38,41,52,
55,63, 88, 89, 121, 168,
173,179,180,240,244,
280, 288,290,295,296,
298, 307, 321, 333, 339,
344,347,348
Osbome, P. L., 241, 248,291
On.M.E., 193
O m n , D., 168
OI-de, W. K., 104
425
Reinbach, W., 55
Reiss, J. O., 55,62, 63
Rengel, D., 140, 144
Reques, R., 208,242,243,250,
251,284
Resetarits, W. J., Jr., 266, 275
Retallick, R. W., 296, 325
Reuter, T., 166, 167
Reyer, H.-U., 243,252
Reynolds, R P., 12,23
Reynolds, W. A., 203, 205,206,
207,260
Reynolds, W. W., 203,204,205,
206,207
Rhodin, J. A. G., 28,93
Rice, T. M., 18
Richards, C. M., 255
Richards, S. J., 29, 34, 37,243,
261,262,263,297,310
Richmond, J. E., 210
Richmond, N. D., 201
Richter, S., 132, 133, 135, 136,
137,138,140,144,174
Ridewood, W. G., 53,55,56,
57,71,75,76-77
Riedel, C., 196
Rieger, R. M., 279
Riggs, A,, 190, 191
Xis, N., 251
Rist, L., 240
Ritke, M. E., 266
Rivero, J. A., 297
Rivero-Blanco, C., 305
Roberts,A., 152, 153, 155,162,
168,225,226,238
Roberts, J.D., 174, 175, 181,
325
Robinson, D.C., 307
Robinson, S. J., 30
Rotek, Z., 55, 58, 61, 71
Rodel, M.-O., 220,238,261,
296
Rohlich, P., 135
Roig, V. G., 297
Roos, T. B., 143
Root, R. B., 249
Rosati, R. R, 245,246
Rose, B. R., 171
Rose, M. J., 187,286,289,293
Rose, S. M., 255
Rose, W., 303
Rosel von Rosenhof, A. J., 3
Rosen, D. E., 121
Rosenberg, E. A., 213, 260
Rosenberg, K., 107, 112, 113
Rosenthal, B. M., 155
Rossi, A,, 92
Rostand, J., 179
Roth, A. H., 254
Roth, G., 53,55,56, 72,73, 74,
75,91,151,160,181
Rouf, M. A., 102
Rougier, C., 109
Rovainen, C. M., 199
Rovira, J., 130
Rowe, C. L., 21,40,242, 267
Rowe, L., 251, 282
Rowedder, W., 58
Royce, G. J., 165
Rubin, D. I., 155
Rubinson, R, 158, 160, 164
426
Ruby, J. R, 140
Rugh, R., 93,95,106,255
Ruibal, R., 31, 35,44, 55. 113,
213,296,314,340
Rui. Garcia, F. N., 304
Rusconi, M., 107
Russeli, A. P., 296
Russeli, I. J., 158, 163, 164
Ruthven, A. G., 173
Ryan, M. J., 162
Ryke, P. A. J., 77, 78, 79
Sabater-Pi, J., 329
Sabbadin, A,, 138
Saber, P. A,, 249
Sabnis, J. H., 216
Sahu, A. K., 223
Saidapur, S. K., 142, 143
Saint-Ange,M., 4
Salas, A. W., 321
Salibin, A,, 212
Salthe, S. N., 171,172,185
Salvador, A., 296
Sampson, L. V, 27, 175, 180
Saraeva, N. Y.,135
Sarikas, S. N., 20
Sarnat, H. B., 161
Saruwatari, T., 17
Sasaki, F., 92
Sasaki, H., 153
Satel, S. L., 88,90
Sater, A. K., 93
Sato, K., 104
Satterfield, C.K., 237
Saunders, R., 22
Savage, J. M., 41,295,296, 305,
306,308
Savage,RM.,6,49,51,80, 81,
107, 112, 123, 181, 196,
240,243,244,254,268
Saxn, L., 138
Sazima, I., 315, 318
Scadding, S. R., 17
Scalia, F., 160, 165
Schechtman, A. M., 16
Scheel, J. J., 173, 231
Scheid, P., 192
Schenkel-Brunner,H., 229
Schiesari, L. C.,217,219
Schjfsrna, K.,296
Schiatz, A,, 231,296, 312,313,
328
Schlaepfer, M. A., 18
Schley, L., 224
Schlosser, G., 53, 55, 56, 72, 73,
74, 75,91, 151, 181
Schluga, A,, 135,136,138
Schluter, A., 315, 321
Schmalhausen, I. I., 29
Schmid, M., 144
Sdimidt, B. R., 272
Schmidt-Nielsen, B., 211
Schmidt-Nielsen, K., 197,206,
209
Schmiedehausen, S., 259
Schmuck, R., 211,252
Schmutzer, W., 248
Schnack, J. A., 262
Schneider, L., 104
Schoonbee, H. J., 221
Schorr, M. S., 248
A U T H O R INDEX
Schubert, G., 104
Schulze, F. E., 4, 38,55,63,68,
74, 75, 80, 81, 84, 107
Schutte, F., 175, 326
Schutte, M., 167
Schwartz, A,, 173, 174,308
Schwartz, J. J., 162
Scott, N.J., Jr., 28,29, 295, 297,
331
Scott-Birabn,M. T., 5
Seale, D. B., 88, 107, 189,216,
217,221,223, 240,243,
244,248,263,292
Sedra, S. N., 55,56,60,63,66,
68,69, 70, 72, 73, 74, 75,
77,84,92, 106, 163
Seibert, E. A,, 200,201,217,
223,224,260
Seigel, R. A,, 252
Sekar, A. G., 216,247
Selenka, E., 181
Semiitsch, R. D., 21,22, 185,
205,208,226,238,243,
247,250,256,259,260,
261,262,263, 264,266,
267,272
Senn, D. G., 158
Serra, J. A., 296
Sesarna, P., 130
Sever, D.M., 20
Severtsov, A. S., 55,56, 84,216
Sexton, O. J., 200, 260,263
Seyrnour, R S., 21, 181, 192,
194,229
Shder, H. B., 20,279,295
ShafFer, L. R., 171
Shapovalov, A. I., 155
Shaw, E., 231
Shaw, J. P., 42
Shelton, P. M. J., 163, 164
Sheratt, T. N., 261
Sherman, E., 199,203,204,
205,208,224
Shield, J. W., 198
Shirnozawa, A., 127, 130
Shine, R, 171
Shrane, T., 140, 144
Shiriaev, B. I., 150
Shoemaker, V H., 132, 181,252
Shofner, W. i?,163
Shurnway, W., 8,92,93
Shupliakov, O. V, 150
Shvarts, S. S., 237, 259
Siegfried, W. R., 232
Siekrnann, J. M., 296
Sih, A., 273
Siiver, M. L., 152
Siiverstone, P. A., 173, 305, 306,
315
Simnett, J. D., 137
Simon, M. P., 174
Sirnons, B. P., 162
Sirnpson, H. B., 158
Sin, G., 247
Singer, J. F., 153
Sinsch, U., 240, 316
Sive, H., 34
Skeliy, D. K., 229,238,243,
253,263,291
Skiles, M. P., 158, 160
Slade, N. A., 88, 123,240
Slater, D. W., 17
Slater, P., 324
Srnirnov, S. V, 21
Srnith, C.L., 155
Smith, D.C.,
200,208,232,
237,243,252, 259, 263,
264,280,282
Srnith. D. G., 105,106,196,
197
Srnith, E. N., 308,309
Smith, L. D.,143,144
Srnith, M.A., 28,41,229,296,
298,320,321,329,330
Smith, R J. F., 263
Srnith, S. C.,164,165
Smithberg, M.,24,25
Srnith-Gill, S. J., 204,205,208,
209,229,251,272,281,
283,285
Snetkova, E., 224
Sobotka, J. M., 22
Sokol, A., 256
Sokol, O. M., 5, 6,9, 33, 50, 53,
54, 55,56,57,58, 59,60,
61,62,63,64,68,70,71,
72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 84, 88,
90, 107, 109, 113, 123,
237,296,326, 339, 344,
347,348
Somero, G. N., 192
Song, J., 17
Sotairidis, P. K., 245, 247
Sotelo, C.,159
Souza, K. A., 61
Spallanzam, L., 171
Spannhof, I., 180
Spannhof, L., 135,180
Spemann, H., 56
Spencer, K., 10-11,23, 51, 337
Sperry, D. C., 155
Sperry, D. G., 25,79,206,219,
260
Sperry, R. W., 149
Spinar, Z. V, 3
Spitzer, J. L., 154
Spiker, N. C.,154
Splechma, H.,137, 138
Spornitz, U. M., 140
Spray, D. C.,168
Sprumont, l?, 106
Stanley, H. P., 142
Starr, R. C.,22
Starrett, P. H., 5,9, 31,33, 38,
42, 53, 56,57,62,67,68,
70, 71,82, 89,90, 121,
240, 244,296, 302, 303,
339,344,347,348
Stauffer, H. P., 226
Stebbins, R. C., 221, 302
Steele, C.W., 239
Stefanelh, A,, 158
Stehouwer, D. J., 160,226, 238
Stein, J. R., 22
Steinberg, M. S., 135
Steinke, J. H., 20
Steinman, R. M., 34
Steinwascher, K., 216, 223,239,
243,244,245,246,248,
255,256
Steneck, R. S., 49
Stensaas, L. J., 155
A U T H O R INDEX
Taylor, E. H., 5,298,307,332,
333
Taylor, J. D., 105,344
Taylor, J. S. H., 153
Taylor, R. E.,Jr., 212
Taylor, R. J., 232
Taylor, W. R.,12
Tejedo, M., 208,242,243,
246,
250,251,258,284
Ten Donkelaar, H. J., 154,155
Teran, H . R., 181
Terent'ev, P. V:,296
Terhivuo, J., 267
Test, F. H.,
229,246,260
Tevis, L., Jr., 207,229,266
Theil, E. C., 190
Theirry, T., 10-11,23
Thibaudeau, D. G., 38,45,46,
129,130,131
Ueda, H., 217
Uhlenhuth, E., 208
Ultsch, G. R., 190,192,193,
194,196,197,198,199,
200,201,203,
205,207,
209,260
Underhill, D. K, 21
Underhill, L. G., 232
Uray, N. J., 149,159
Ustach, P., 6
Utsunomiya, T., 332
Utsunomiya, Y., 265,332
427
Webb, R. G., 40,41,49,295,
297,309,339
Webster, H. D., 168
Webster, T. P., 205
Weigmann, D. L.,248
Weir, A.,183
Weisz, P. B., 55
Welis, K. D., 162,187,219,220
Wenig, J., 104
Werduiius, B., 191
Werner, E. E., 198,223,238,
240,243,25
1,263,269,
275,282,292
Wersall, J., 163
Werschkul, D. F.,236
Wachtel, S. S., 144
Wessels, N.K.,145
Wessenberg, H . S., 248
Wager, V: A.,5,173,175,180,
West, N. H., 192,197,198,
181,220,228,
296,297,
47,48,50,184,340,343
Vagnetti, D., 45
199,201
303,304,306,313,323,
Thibier-Fouchet, C., 142
Vaira, M., 262
Westerfield, M., 18
328,329,331,334
Thele, J., 24,34
Valencia, J., 296,316,317,318, Wagner, E., 140,142,144, 145
Wever, E. G., 61,162
334
Thiesse, M. L.,160
Wakahara, M., 143
Weygoldt, P., 173,184,219,307
Thornas, D. A.G., 219
Vaientine, J. W, 294
Wake, D. B., 3,77,149,155,
White, B. A., 283
Thornas, E., 31,35,44,55,113, Valerio, C.E., 30,227
Whitear, M., 104
171,185
Vaiett, B. B., 173,180
Whitford, W G., 192
296,314,340
Wake, M. H., 35,59,85,132,
Thornas, E. I., 93
Van Bambeke, C., 3,4,49
Wlutington, P. M., 143
142,145,171,174,181,
Thompson, R. I,., 164
Van Bergeijk, W. A,, 61,163
Whitlock, D. G., 154,159
182,185,304
Thorns, C.,296
Van Beurden, E. K., 192
Wiens, J. A.,229,230
Wakernan, J. M., 199,201
Thrail, J. H., 248
Van Buskirk, J., 30,263,264,
Walcott, B., 64,83
Wiens, J. J., 55,64,75,78
Tihen, J. A,, 123
274,275
Waidick, R C., 224
Wilbur, H.M., 6,200,206,208,
Toai, K.R., 111, 297
Vance, W. H., 151
Waidnian, B., 230,232,233,
215,229,230,232,240,
Toews, D. P., 201
234,235,236,237
241.242,243,247,249,
Van de Kamer, J. C., 168
Toloza, E. M., 186,209
Vandenbos, R. E.,248
Wallace, R. A,, 144
253,254,256,257,261,
Toner, P. G., 132
Van Den Broek, A. J. P., 132
266,270,274,275,276,
Walls, S. C.,
237,254
Tosney, K. W., 16
Van Der Horst, C. J., 164
277,279,280,281,285,
Waiters, B., 260
Townsend, D. S.,16,171,172,
Van Der Linden, J. A. M., 154,
Wang, C.-S., 332
291,296
Wangersh P. J., 221
Wilqnska, B., 125
174,177,179,180,181,
159
Van Der Westhuizen, C. M., 55, Waringer-Loschenkohl, A,, 230, Wilczynski, W., 149,158,159,
187,188
Townsend, V: R., Jr., 261
160,161,163
243,269
57,58,60,62,63,64
Tracy, C. R., 204,205
Van Dijk, E. D., 3,5,8,9,
14,
Warkentin, K. M., 209,216,264 Wild,E.R.,55,268,315,320
Trainor, F. R., 22
Wdey,E. O., 72,74,90,
151
17,28,29,34,35,37,48, Warner, S. C., 260,276
Travis, J., 223,230,241,
243,
179,220,295,
296,297,
Warren, E., 175,179,180,181, Willielm, G. B.,153,189
Wd, U., 158,159,164
246,250,253,259,262,
298,306,327,328,329,
186
272,279,280,281,282,
Wasserman, W. J., 144
Wdey, A., 34
331,333,342,347,348
283,284,285,286,287, VanEeden, J.A., 55,58,61,62, Wassersug, R. J., 3,5,9,16,20, Willhite, C., 203,206
288,293,296
63,64
25,27,29,30,33,35,41, Wdliams, G. C., 232
Treisrnan, M., 232
Van Gansen, P., 140,144
Wfiams, J. D.,
296,321
44,48,49,52,
55,56,57,
Trenerry, M. P., 248,269,271
Van Geettmyden, J., 137
61,79,80,87,88,90,91, Wfiams, M., 143
Trewavas, E., 75
Van Kampen, P. N., 297
104,107,109,111,112,
W ~ a m sM.
, A.,143
Trexler, J. C.,
253
Van Mier, E,155
Wfiamson, I.,258
113,119,121,123,150,
Tmeb, L.,6,8,9,10-11,23,
38, Vannini, E., 137,138,143
Wdson, D.J., 238
153,154,166,179,182,
50,54,55,57,58,59,61,
Van Oordt, P.G. W. J., 145
Wdson, L. D.,
296
186,192,194,195,196,
62,63,64,76,77,78,88,
Van Pletzen, R., 79
Wdson, M. V: H., 18
197,199,200,201,206,
Wiltshire, D.J., 270
90,123,162,180,206,
Van Seters, W.H., 55,64
216,217,219,223,224,
207,215,216,220,229,
Veltkamp, C. J., 22
W~rnberger,P. H.,
21
225,226,227,
228,230,
Windnim, G. M., 20
Vences, M., 174,296,320,323,
230,291,296,
299,300,
231,232,236,
237,240,
332
241,243,244,249,260, Winkibauer, R., 165
308,340
Tschugui~ova,T. J., 61
Vera, M. A., 174,179
279,280,283,288,290, Wischnitzer, S., 142
Tsuneki, K.,136
Verma, N.,
211
291,292,296,297,298, Wise, R. W., 190
Tubbs, L. O. E., 41,45,48,50 Vermeij, G. J., 291
Witschi, E., 8,61,97,101,162,
307,322,323,331,333,
Tucker, V: A,, 132,210,213
163
Veself, M., 55,58
334,340,341,344,348
Tung, T. C.,
132.137
VesseUun, N.P.,160
Watanabe, K., 24,35
Wollmuth, L. P., 203,205,206,
Turner, R. J.,97
Via, S., 285
Watkins, T. B., 223
207,208,224,260
Turner, S. C., 137
Woliweber, L., 16
Viertel, B., 9,33,49,102,105,
Watling, L., 49
Turnipseed, G., 268
107,108,109,110,111,
Watson, G. F.,296,310,323,
Wong, A. L.-C., 248,255
Turpen, J. B., 95,97,100,135
Wong, S., 223
112,114,115,117,119,
324,325,334
Twitty, V: C., 1
Watt, K. W. K., 190
Wood, S. C.,
224
121,122,123,125,126,
Twornbly, S., 186
128,216,223,244,298, Watt, P. J., 215
Woodward, B. D.,
200,230,
Tyler, M. J., 5,12,24,37,41,
242,259,260,263,271,
346,348
Webb, A. C., 140,144
49,67,172,175,202,296, Vietti, M., 137
Webb, J. F., 164
286
310,324,325
Vigenti, C., 142
Webb, P. W.,
225
Workman, G., 203,205
428
Wratten, S. D., 18
Wright, A. A., 4,296,307, 309,
321,326,331
Wright, A. H., 4,5,296, 307,
309,321,326,331
Wright, M. L., 29,249,260
Wright, P. A., 132
Wright, P. M., 132
Wright, R K., 97
Wright, S., 292
Wu, T. H., 146
Wylie, C. C., 143, 144
AUTHOR INDEX
Xavier, F., 142, 144, 173, 179,
181,182
Yacob, A. Y., 133, 135, 137
Yamaguchi, K., 142, 143, 144
Yamamoto, M., 34
Yamasaki, H., 229
Yang, D.-T., 296, 329, 330
Yazdani, G. M., 303
Ye, C., 319
Yoshizaki, N., 34
Yoshizato, K., 25,28,92,229
SUBJECT INDEX
Abdominal veins, 95
Abducens nerve (VI), 59
Abiotic factors, in evolution, 182
Acclimation, 206,284-85
Acid-base balance, 132,201-2
Acidic mine drainage, 213
Acidosis, 201
Acid rain, 201,213-14
Acinar cells, 132
Acoustic foramina, 60
Acoustic nerve VIII, 60
Actin iiaments, 104
Adaptations, tadpole stage as,
279-80
Adenohypophysis, 146,162
Adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), 106
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP),
190
Adepidermal membrane, 104
Adhesive glands, 32, 34,47, 183
Aditus laryngis, 106
Adrenal glands, 147
Adrenocorticotropic (ACTH)
cells, 145
Aggregations. See also Schooling
choice tests, 232-34
geometric suucnire of, 230
and kin recog~tion,232-37
schooling, 231-32
of sibling groups, 235
and social attraction, 230
subdivision of, 236
and thermoreguiation, 207-8,
224
and vuinerability to predation,
26 1
Aggressive encounters, 258
Air
breathing of, 197, 220, 223,
224,261
guiping of, 201
Aiarm cells, 104
Aician Blue 8GX, 17
Aicohol, as fixative, 12
Algae, as food, 22
Aiimentary tracts. See &o Digestive system
development in endotrophs,
181
dorsolateral views, 108
ventral views, 109
Aiizarin Red S, 1 7
Aiielopathy, 259
a-Grandes, 146
Amacrine cells, 167
!unmonium ions, 212
Amphibian papiiia, 162
Amygdala, 160
Amygdaloid nucleus, 165
Anerobiosis, 194-95
Angular bones, 64
Anguiosplenial bones, 64
Annuius cricoideus, 75
Anterior cardinal vein, 101
Anterior copula, 71
Anterior cupola, 5 7
Anterior parathyroid gland, 103
Antibody staining, 1 7
Anus. See vents; vent tube
SUBJECT INDEX
Dorsal filter plates, 105
Dorsal gi remnant, 101
Dorsalis trunci, 78,79
Dorsal pericardium, 93
Dorsal tonsils, 101
Dorsal vela, 113, 115
Ductus cysticus, 131
Ductus thoracici, 100-101
Ducnis thyreoglossus, 146
Duodenum, boundary, 131
Ears, 159, 180
Ecology. See aho Environments
factors affecting, 241
interactions in. 241-43
relationships between species,
24748
Ecomorphological classifications,
9-12
basis of, 1 2
and body shapes, 48
diversity of anuran tadpoles,
13
and oral apparatus, 48-50
Egg jeuy
and desiccation, 186
and egg preservation, 15
embryo recognition of kin,
234
in endotrophic development,
186
and hatching gland function,
34
illustration of layers, 20
physical properties of, 20
removal of, 1 8
Eggs
coiiection of specimens, 20-21
desiccation of, 252
of endotrophs, 172, 175
examination of, 18
as food source, 218-19
illustration of, 20
netting of, 21
pigmentation, 179
preservation of, 1 5
retention of, 183, 185
staining of, 20-21
terrestrial masses, 291
turgidtv, of.. 186
Egg &
and composition, 184,18586
and developmental timing,
184
and arowth rate. 285
and ietamorphic parameters,
257
and sprint speeds, 258
variations in, 284
Egg tooth, 179
Electrolytes, 132
Electroshockers, 20
Elevation, 202,204
Ehptical hyoquadrate joint, 82
Elygia, 2 9
Embryology, of endotrophs,
177-78
Embryonic discs, 177
Embryonic stages, Gosner equivalent, 92
Embryos
as category, 9
cdture of, 180
endotrophs, 176-77
pigmentation, 179
Endocardial tube, 9 3
Endocrine pancreas, 146
Endocrine system, anatomy of,
14547
Endolymphatic fluid, 162
Endolymphatic foramen, 6 1
Endolymphatic sacs, 180
Endoplasmic reticdum (ER),
106,115
Endotrophc anurans, 170-88
body development, 178
breeding biology, literature review, 173-75
characterization of taxa, 171
comparison of staging systems,
178
definition, 12
developmental energy, 170
development of, 172-82
digestive system, 181
diversity of tadpoles, 13-14
early embryology, 177-78
egg tooth, 179
example taxa, 13
families and genera, 172
gills, 179-80
guilds, 170
hatching, 181-82
integument, 179
limb development, 178
literature review of anciilary
subjects, 171
mouthpart development, 179
nervous system, 180-81
operculum, 180
physiology, 181-82
reproductive system, 1 8 1
respiratory system, 180
sensory systems, 180-81
skeletogenesis, 181
spiracle, 180
mil development, 178-79
urogenital system, 181
Endotrophy
evolution of, 182-87
exotrophs approaching,
183-84
and oviposition, 183
Energy. SCCa150 Resources
aiiocation during development,
283
and egg size or composition,
185-86
Environmental uncertain~;
275-77
Environments. See also Ecology
and aggregations, 230
and coloration, 30
and evolution, 3
and growth, 280
hypercarbic, 190
intluence o n keratinized
mouthparts, 2 1
Enzymes, digestive, 131
Eosinophils, 97,101
Ependymal layer, 157
4 31
and morphological models,
216-17
morphology and buccal pumping, 88
and Orton's tadpole types, 8991,243
rates and particle size, 244
suspension, 223,224
Femoral veins, 9 5
Fenestra frontoparietalis, 59
Fenestra ovalis, 59
Fenesua rotundum, 6 1
Feduation, of endotrophs,
172-77
Fiber optic lights, 1 5
Fick's law of diffision, 196
Field studies
competition and predation,
270-72
enclosures, 252-54
marking techniques, 18
photography, 1 9
Filter apparatus, 107
cytology of, 120-21,122
histogenesis, 116
morphogenesis, 115-17
ontogeny of, 115, 117, 1 2 4
25,126
origin and morphogenesis,
128
structure of, 114
Filter plates, 112, 117
Fiitration rates, and particle size,
243-44
Fins, 26,178
Fissura metotica, 6 1
Fitness
definition of, 289
and Me-history stages, 281
maximization of, 279
Fixation, 12, 1 4 1 5 , 2 9 5
Flageiium, tail, 28
Flask ceiis, 104
Fluorescent elastomers, 1 8
Food. See aho Diet; Feeding
and buccal pumping rate, 221
for cultured tadpoles, 2 1-22
density, body mass and, 257,
258
and growth, 245
and metamorphic parameters,
257
and metamorphic timing,
218-84
particulate, effect of supply,
184
sources of, 216
Foramen jugulare, 6 1
Foramen magnum, 6 1
Foramen orbitonasalis, 59
Foramina carotica primaria, 54
Foramina olfactoria evehentia, 59
Forebrain, anatomy of, 160-62
Foregut, 123,129,130
Formalin, 12, 1 4
Fossiis, tadpole, 3
Fourth ventricle, 157
Frontal organ, 168
Front legs, eruption of, 25
Frontoparietal fenestra, 59
Frontoparietals, 6 1
SUB J E C T I N D E X
Frozen lakes, and temperature
tolerance, 202
Funnel traps, 20
Gabladder, 131, 181
Gametes, 172-77
Ganghon cells, 167
Gas exchange, 104
and egg jeiiy, 186
partitioning, 196-20 1
physiology of, 191-96
and temperature, 202,204
Gastric vein, 95
Gastdation, 175, 177
Gene expression, sequential, 187
Geniohyoideus muscle, 67
Geniohyoid muscle, 82
Genotypes, and vulnerability to
predators, 260
Geotaxis, 228,229
Gi apparatus, summary of literam e , 55-57
Gi arches, in endotrophs, 180
Gi arch skeleton, 64
Gi cavity, anatomy of, 80-81
Gi irrigation
A . truei, 85-86
branchial pump, 84
buccal pump, 82-84
buccal pumping, 87-88
evolutionary and comparative
aspects, 84-88
and frequency of breathing,
106
Gradwell's model, 85
hydrostatic pressures, 83
and hypoxia, 199
muscle activity, 83
E annectens, 86
pharyngeai pump, 84
R. mtesbeianu, 80-84
viscerai skeleton during, 82
X. l a r , 86-87
Gis
anatomy of, 105-6
CO, and growth of, 105
contribution to gas exchange,
198
endotroph development,
179-80
ion uptake through, 212
persistent, 105
remnants, 104
Gi tufts, diagram of, 106
GiU ventilation cate, 224
Gland ceiis, 125
Glanduia interposita, 101
Glial astroqes, 162
Glomus, 135
Glossopharyngeal nerve (E),
61
Glottis, 106,107,109
Glycerin, 17
Goblet cells (SC2), 104, 115,
117, 123, 131. Seealso Mucous cells
Goiter, 22
Golgi complex, 104, 106, 115
Gonads. See also Ovaries; Testes
development in endotrophs,
181
development of, 138-39
differentiation of, 1 4 0 4 1
and fat bodies, 143
male, 140
cate of development, 144
sex differentiation, 140
Gosner system of staging
approximation to other system, 8
for exotrophic tadpoles, 10-11
of staging, 8-9
use of, 298
Grazing, 223,248
Growth
early, 280-81
factors decting, 245
link with development, 281
and social behaviors, 237
unrestrained exponential, 280
Growth rates
correlation with larval period,
286
and fimess, 279-80
genetics of, 285-86
iduences on, 248-60
models of, 280-81
and ppuiation density, 243
and survival, 280
and temperature, 202,208-9
Guilds, 48,170,186-87
Gustation, 166
Gut, 212,244-45. See alro Digestive system; Intestines
Habenuia, 161
Habitats
factors decting ecology of,
24 1
general features, 240-41
partitioning of, 268-69
and vulnerability to predators,
260
Habitat selection
sensory stimuli and, 239
and substrates, 229-30
Hair ceh, 162,163-64
Hassa's corpuscles, 101
Hatching
and egg jelly, 186
in endotrophs, 181-82
factors iduencing, 229
"late," 183
and the oxygen supply, 183
Hatching glands, 34
Hatchlings
behavior of, 229
as category, 9
endotrophs, 176-77
guild assignment, 186-87
size and available energy,
186
Head, width of, 294
Head flap, 32
Heart, 93, 94. See also Circulatory system
Heat exchange, 105
Heights, measurement of, 26
Helminth parasites, 248
Hematocrits, 2 10
Hematopoietic precursor cells,
100
Hemoglobin (Hb), 100,190-91
S U B JECT INDE
mesonephros, 181
opisthonephnc, anatomy of, 6,
93,135-36
stones, 22
Kin association, 232-37
Kin recognition, 232-37
Kin selection, 291
K i r ~ e l z e l h ,104
Labeling, 15
Labial flaps, 38
Labial teeth
chronology of research, 4
ecornorphologicalviews, 49
examination of, 17-18
keratinized, derivation, 42
rnargins, 37
and mode of feeding, 280
ontoaenv, 46
and & I i & s crnorphology,
37-38
replacernent, 42
size of, 42
termuiology, 35
and tooth ridges, 38-42
variations in, 43
Labial tooth row formuia
(LTRF),40,41,46,50
Labial tooth rows (LTRs), 41
Lactate, 195,201
Lagena, 158,163
Lamina orbitonasalis, 57, 59
Lamina temiinaiis, 167
Larval periods
correlation with growth rate,
286
genetics of, 286
length of, 285-86
and popuiation density,
256-57
Larval samples, storage of, 14-15
Larval stages, Gosner equivalent,
92
Larval stornach, 123
Larval traits
ecological genetics of, 284-88
intrageneric relationships, 5
Laryngeal cartilages, 106
Larynx, anatomy of, 75
Lateral cephahc vein, 59
Lateral circumoral ligament, 63
Lateral hypogiossal nucleus, 158
Lateral lemniscus, 158
Lateral line nerve, 164
Lateral line organs, 18
Lateral line system, 163-65
and school structure, 238
Lateral posterior cardinal veins,
93
Lateral sacs, 27
Lateral tecti inferius, 58
Lateral tem superius, 58
Latissirnus dorsi, 79
Learning
and habitat preference, 239
vision, 237-38
Lectins, 127
Length, termuiology for, 36
Lens, 166
Liver
anatomy, 131
development in endotrophs,
181
hematopoiesis, 96,97
Locomotion
anatomy of, 79-80
behaviors, 224-29
neurornuscular control, 226
semi-terrestrial,228, 229
tail flipping, 228,229
and temperanire, 209
terrestrial, 227-28
using oral discs, 227
wiggling, 228
Longissirnus dorsi, 78, 79
LTRF (labial tooth row formula),,
40,41,46,50
LTR (labial tooth row), 41
Lung buds, 106
Lungs
anatomy of, 106-7
contribhion to gas exchange,
198
dfierentiation of, 104
and gas exchange, 196
and hypoxia, 195-96, 22324
Lymphatic organs, 97, 100-101
Lymphatic sacs, 100
Lymphatic vessels, 97, 101
Lymph glands, 97,101-3
Lyrnphocytes, 101,102,103
Lyrnphomyeloid organs, 101,
103
Lyophylization, 16
Macrophages, 97, 101
Macrophagy, 229
Macula densa, 138
Malpighian corpuscles, 135
Mandibuiae tentaculi, 70
Mandibulolabialis rnuscle, 38,
40,66, 67
Mandibuio-suprarostral ligarnents, 63,81,82
Manicotto glandulare, 123, 125,
127, 129, 130. See &o
Stomach
Marking techniques, 18
Mastication, 159
Mate choice, 259
Matemal behavior, 219, 220
Maternal dects, 284-85
Mauthner cells, 158
Mechanoreceptors, 163
Meckel's cartilages, 49
lower jaw, 64
rnetamorphosis of, 75, 76
rnovernent of, 8 1
rnuscles attached to, 82
Medial longitudinal fasciculus,
158
Medial posterior cardinal veins,
93
Meduiiary nucleus mediaiis, 164
Meiosis, 142
Melanin, 30, 105
Melanophores, 30, 104, 105
Melanophore-stimuiating horrnone (MSH), 105
434
Mucopolysaccarhides, 186
Mucous, 119,283
Mucous ceiis, 104. See also Goblet ceiis
Mucous cords, 123
Mderian ducts, 142,145
Murrafs Clear, 17
Muscular process, 62
Musculature
axial skeleton, 77-80
body w d , 78
branchal baskets, 71
buccai floor, 64,66-68
craniai, 65, 66, 77
hyoid, 71
jaw, 68-70
of the larynx, 75
summary of literature, 55-57
tnink, 78,226-27
Musculo-abdominal veins, 95
Musculus constrictor branchialis,
105
Muscdus dilator laryngis, 106
Myocardium, growth of, 93
Myxozoan parasites, 248
Nares
apemre, 32
diameter, 26
external, morphology of, 31
internai, 112
order of examination, 16
water flow through, 84
Nasal capsde, 57
Nasal septum, 57
Nasolacrimal ducts, 29
Nematode parasites, 248
Neotropical ponds, diorama, 217
Neotropical streams, diorama,
218
Nephric ducts, 131
Nephrons. See d o Kidneys
innervation of, 136
morphogenesis of, 138
Nephrostomes, fusion of, 136
Nervous systems
endotroph development,
180-81
overview, 150-52
Nets, use of, 20
Neurai arches, ossification, 78
Neural crest cells, 143
Neuromasts, 163-64, 181
Neutrophils, 97, 101, 102, 103
Nidicolous continuum, 183, 184
Nidicolous guild, 170
Nitrogenous excretion, 132,
136,252
Nomenclature, conventional
names, 2
Notocord, 54, 77
Nucleases, synthesis of, 132
Nucleus isthmi, 158
Nucleus lentiformis, 160
Nucleus profundus, 160
Nutrition. See also Feeding; Food
of cdtured tadpoles, 21-22
and gland cell development,
125
and PBTs, 207
SUBJECT INDEX
Obiiquus abdominis externus superficialis, 78
Observation, rnethods of, 15-18
Occipital arch, 54
Ocular reticles, 15
Oculornotor foramen, 59
Oculornotor nerve (111), 59
Offspring, communication with
parents, 2 19-21
Of Scientists a n d Salamandevs
(Twi.),
1
Olfactos. bdbs (CNI), 160,
165
Olfactos. canals, 59
Olfactos. epithelium, 164
Olfactos. organs, 180
Olfactos. systern, 165-66
Omphalomesenteric veins, 95
Oocytes, 140,142,175
Oogonia, 140, 144
Oophagy, 218-19
Opercular chamber, 111
Operculum, 162
definition, 3 1
endotroph development, 180
fusion with the body w d , 31,
33
Operculunl (otic), 60
Ophthalmic artery, 59
Ophthaimic branch of V; 59
Opisthonephros, 93,96, 1 0 3 4 ,
134-35
Optic foramen, 59
Optic nucleus, 160
Optic placodes, 180
Oral apparatus
atrophy of, 25,48
ecomorphologicalviews,
48-50
functionai morphology, 49
iliustrations of, 19
morphology, 48-50
ontogeny of, 45-48
oral disc, 35
representative contigurations,
300
terminology for, 35-36
Oral discs
extension during ixation, 17
extrinsic muscdature, 38-39
and feeding ecology, 3
iilustration, 19, 35
in length measurement, 25
morphology, 36-38
order of examination, 15-16
and tadpole movement, 227
terminology, 35
umbeiiiform, 36-37
Oral flap. See Labial flaps
Oral pad, 46
Orbital cartilage, 58
Orbital region, 58-59
Orbitohyoideusmusdes, 71, 82,
84
Orbitonasal foramen, 59
Orbitosphenoid, 59
Orbits, 26
Orton's tadpole types, 52-53, 54,
89-91, 112
Osmoregulation, l 3 2 , 2 10-14
Osmotic pressures, 2 13
Ossification
craniai, 88
sequence in endotrophs, 181
Ostia pharyngea, 60
Ostium, 142
Ostium abdominale, 144
Otic capsules, 59-61, 75
Otic iigament, 59
Otic process, 62
Otocyst of Chibon, 180
Otoliths of Hughes, 180
Ovaries, 140, 144. See also
Gonads
Overwintering
and rnetamorphosis, 208
and Q,", 192
and temperature tolerance
limits, 202
Oviductal secretions, 182
Oviducts, 142
Oviposition, 293
endotrophy and, 183
and maie behaviors, 187
Ovisacs, 142
Ovoviviparous guild, 170
Oxygen
carrying capacity in tadpoles,
190
changes in whole-body conductance, 192-93
dissociation curves, 190
dissolved, and growth rates,
249
dissolved, and temperatiire,
200
extraction by filter plates, 105
and hatching, 183
limitations of uptake snidies,
191
and lung function, 106
tempera&re and consumption,
209
uptake of, 191-96
Oxygen tension (PJ, 192, 194,
229
Pachytene oocytes, 142
Pachytene spermatocytes, 142
Paedornorphosis, 294
Pain, sense of, 168
Paiatabihty, 260-61
Paiatines, 59
Paiatoquadrate cartilage, 57,
62-63
Pancreas, 132, 181
Pancreatic enzymes, 131
Papdiae
buccai floor arena, 110
buccal roof arena, 110
lingual, 110, 111, 112
marginal, 46, 47
and mode of feedmg, 280
morphology, 36-38
postnarial, 112
on the snout, 29
Parachordals, 54
Parahyoid bone, 76
Parasites
and inhibition of growth, 255
S U B JECT INDE
Phylogenetic analyses, 50
Phylogeny, and the first tadpole,
52-53
Physiology, and the environment, 189-214
Pigmentation. See also Coloration
changes in formalin, 12
chronology of research, 4
endotroph eggs and embryos,
179
eyes, 29
integument and, 104-5
iridiophore, photography of,
20
oral disc, 36
in tadpoles, 29-3 1
Pila antotica, 59
Pila ethmoidalis, 59
Pila prootica, 59
Pin cells, 104
Pineal gland, 160,161,162,
168,238
Pipoid larvae, 89-90
Pipoids, cranial ossifications, 88
Pituicytes, 162
Pituitary gland, 105, 148, 162
Piniitary vein, 59
Planum antorbitale, 57
Planum trabeculae anterior, 54
Plasma
composition, 210-1 1
p H of, 201
salinity and osmotic pressure
of, 213
Plectrum, 60, 162
Plesiomorphic larvae, 89-90
Pluripotent hemapotoietic stem
celis (PHSCs). 95
PO,, 105: 192,195, 197, 199,
200
Po~ulationdensities
body mas, density and, 257,
258
and growth, 245
larval period length, 256-57
and metamorphic parameters,
257
stress and, 250
and survival, 252-53
frorn a temporary pond, 242
Population stability, 266-67
Porphyropsin, 167
Portal vein, 95
Positioning, for examination,
16
Posterior copula, 70
Posterior parathyroid gland,
103
Posterior vena cava, 95
Posture, and thermoreguiation,
204
Potassium hydroxide, 14, 1 7
Potassium ions, 213
Predation
and buoyancy, 224
and the competitive hierarchy,
273
&ect on survivors, 274
interspecific,246
and palatabilis; 260-61
Rectum, 131
Recnis abdominis rnusclc, 25,
32, 78, 79
Rectus abdominis profundus, 79
R e m abdominis su~erficialis.
78,79
Reinis cervicis, 79
Referente coliections, 2
Rehydration, of specimens, 14
Renal arteries, 136
Reproduction, timing of,
265-66
Reproductive phenology
and ecological interactions
arnong tadpoles, 276-77
d e c t of short-terrn variations
on, 275-76
Reproductive system
anatomy, 140-43
development of, 143-45
endotroph development of,
181
Resources
and exploitation competition,
243
and population density,
268-70
use of, 281
Respiration, at the surface, 104
Respiratory system
anatomy of, 104-7
behaviors, 223-24
endotroph development, 180
physiology of, 189-202
responses to exercise, 195
Respiratory toxins, 20
Reticle units, 15
Reticuiar celis, 101
Reticular formation, 157
Reticuioendothelial cells, 97
ReticuloendotheLial organs, 97,
100-101
Reticuiospinal tracts, 155
Retinas, 166-67,180
Rhodopsin, 167
Rhombencephalon, 155-59
Riesenzellen, 104
RNk ribosornal, 172, 175
Rods, 166-67
Rohon-Beard cells, 154
Roteone, 20
Round window, 61,162
Rubrospinal tracts, 155
Saccuies, 158, 163, 180
Saccus perilymphaticus, 60-61
Sacral Liiapophyses, 79
Salamanders
and gas exchange, 196
in hypoxic environrnents, 198
oxygen uptake snidies, 191,
193
Salinity, 212-13
Sarnpling
methodology, 20,268-69
problerns in naniral ponds,
254
Saponification, 12
scnning electron microscopy,
16,18
Schleimkphchenzellen, 127
Schooling. See also Aggregations
and egg rnasses, 291
and lateral line systems, 238
Schools, spatial arrangernents in,
237
Seasonal cycles
pattems in habitats, 241
and the pineal gland, 168
and therrnoreguiation, 206-7,
269
Secretory cells (SCs)
bottle-shaped (SCl), 113-21
columnar (SC3), 115-21
goblet (SC2), 115, 119
pear-shaped (SC4), 115
Secretory grooves, 117
Selection
for adult specialization, 288
of habitats, 229-30
heuristic models of, 287, 289
and mortahty factors, 279
Semicircular canals, 59, 158,
163,180
Seminal vesicles, 142
Sensory systems
endotroph development,
180-81
integration of, 162-68
Septorndae, 58
Septum, 160
Septum nasi, 57
Serous glands. 29
Sertoli cells, 144
Sex, differentiation, 144
Shdow ponds, and temperanire
tolerante, 202
Silicon cement, 16
Sinus venosus. 93
~keleto~enesis',
in endotrophs,
181
Skin
carbon dioxide eliniination,
20 1
contribution to gas exchange,
198
and gas exchange, 196
S k d , openings, 61
Smooth vesides, 106
Snout
external nares on, 3 1
length and buccal volume, 87
in length measurement, 25
shape of, 26
Social interactions, 230-32,259
Sodium ions
active transfer, 136
factors influencing uptake, 212
reguiation of, 210-14
Solar radiation, heating, 105
Solum nasi, 57
Space of Disse, 131
Spatial memory, short-tem, 239
Spawning
and calling, 267
site choice, 2 6 4 6 5
Species
assemblages of, 2 6 4 7 0
patterns of co-occurrence,264
Sperm, motility, 175
SUBJ E C T I N D E X
Spermatogenesis, 142, 144
Sperm extmion, 293
Sphenethmoid commissure, 59
Spides, 71, 84
Spinach, 21-22
Spinal cord
anatomy, 152-55
fiber types, 154
b c t i o n of, 150-51
organization of, 153
views of, 150, 151, 153, 154
in young tadpole, 155
Spinal nerves, 153, 154
Spiracle(s)
anatomy of, 80-8 1
chronology of research, 4
definition, 3 1
endouoph developnient, 180
location of, 26
morphology, 3 1,33
order of examination, 16
sinistra], 163
tube arrangements, 33
Splanchnotome, 131
Spleen, 96,97
Stages
and critical thermal maximums, 199
definition, 8
and effect of temperature on
growth, 25 1
and PBTs, 205-6
uncoupling of, 289
Staging systems
comparison of, 8
and endotrophs, 171-72
endotrophs, comparisons of,
178
review of, 8-12
Staining, 17,20-2 1
Stamina, 195-96,224
Standard rates of nletabolism
(SRM)
and oxygen uptake srudies,
192
and temperature, 202,204
Stapes, 6 0 , 6 l
Statoacoustic nerve VIII, 60
Stemohyoideus, 78, 79
Stemohyoid muscle, 158
Stemum, ossification of, 181
Steroid hormones, 145
STF, fixative, 12
St~Pchenzllen,104
Stiing's celis, 147
Stirn organ. See Pineal gland
Stomach, 216, 249. See also Manicotto glandulare
Stoniodeal-hypophysealanlage,
145
Stomodeum, 4 5 4 6
Storage
improper, 295
of larval samples, 14-15
Stratum albumen, 157
Stratum griseum, 157
Stretch receptors
muscular, 168
pulmonaq 197
Striatum, 160, 161
morphology of, 28
muscle, composition of, 28
regression of, 25
in swimming, 225
waves of bending, 226
Taii tip, 28
Taste buds, 166
Tectal cartilages, 59
Tectospinal tracts, 155
Tectum, 160
Tectum nasi, 57
Tectum posterius, 59
Tectum synoticum, 59
Teeth. See a& Labial teeth
calcified, 42
preparation of, 17
Telencephalon, 160
Temperate ponds, thermoreguiation in, 207
Temperature
acclimation to, 206
and aggregations, 207-8
behavioral thermoreguiation,
204-5
and dissolved oxygen, 200
effect on water uptake, 2 12
and growth rates, 249, 25 1
influentes of, 229
and larval periods, 258
and locomotor activity, 209
and mass at metamorphosis,
258
ontogeny of tolerance, 205-6
and oxygen consumption, 209
PBTs, 203
physiologic effects, 204
precision of selection, 205
sense of, 168
thermal physiology, 202-10
tolerance limits, 202-4
and tolerance of hypoxia, 199
Temporas. ponds
and absence of fish predators,
263-64
advantages of, 267
breeders in, 200
effect on reproduction, 242
and fitness, 279-80
and gas exchange, 200
population densities, 242
predation pressure, 291
productivity cycles of, 291
thermoreguiation in, 207
unpredictability of, 268
Terminal nerve (CNO), 160
Terminology
chronology of research, 4-5
standardization of, 3
Testes. See also Gonads
differentiation, 142
formation of, 144
lmal, 140
Thalamus, b c t i o n of, 160
Thermoreguiation
and aggregations, 207-8
behaviod, 2045,224
factors influencing, 206-7
ontogeny of, 205-6
Thrombocytes, 97
Thymus gland, 101,102-3
Thyroid gland, 145-46
Thyroid hormones, 105, 137,
182,283
LEP
x a a ~ ~r 3 a i a n s
TAXONOMIC INDEX
217,219, 220,239,247,
299
Ansonia, 14,27, 36,44, 302,
334
Im@i&ita, 45, 334
Aparmphenoh, 307
Aphantophyne, 172,320
Aphdiscw, 307
Arcavomq 172,320
Arenuphyne, 172,174,324
rotunda, 174
Argenteobiu, 307
Ariequinw, 3 12
Armbates, 305
Arthroleptea, 172, 175, 179,
181, 182,327
hm'm; 175,184
lightfaoti, 175, 180
Arthroleptidae, 301
Arthroleptides, 27, 28, 228, 229,
327
murtiensseni, 228
Arthroleptinae, 301
Arthroleptis, 13, 172, 173, 176,
301
crusculum, 173
poecilonotus, 173
wahlber@, 173, 181
Ascaphidae, 301
Rcmphw, 25,27,29, 31, 33, 34,
44,48,49, 52,53,54, 58,
59, 61, 63, 64,67, 70, 71,
72, 73,74,75, 84, 85,86,
87, 88, 89, 111, 115, 164,
181, 198, 216, 270, 301,
302,334,340,345
truei, 14,33, 38,52, 53,55,
62, 63, 70, 71, 74, 80, 84,
85. 86, 97, 104, 131, 182,
185,202,203,204,205,
206,207,208,227,237,
229,244,248,261,334
Assa, 172, 175, 179, 183, 187,
229,324,340,343
darlinsoni, 13, 175
Asterophryinae, 3 19
Asterophrys, 172,319
Astylosternw, 301,334
comjatw, 27
Atelognathw, 316
reverberii, 112
Atelophyniscw, 27,227,302
chrysophorus, 14
Atelopus, 14,26,27,227, 302,
334,342
crucigeu, 187
ignescens, 32,299, 300
pachydemzw, 334
Atupuphrynus, 316
Aympanophys, 318
Aubria, 328
subsigiliuta, 23 1
TAXONOMIC INDEX
Batrachylodes, 172,328
Beiastoma, 261,262
oqumm, 262
Bombinn, 25,53,54,59,61,63,
70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 89,
93, 111, 112, 115, 158,
225,302,334
bombina, 55, 225,238, 334
ignew, 55
orientalu; 42, 55, 135, 140,
142, 143,144, 145,246,
253,258,261,334
pachypus, 115
variegata, 42, 55,93, 107,
111, 112, 115, 117, 121,
123, 125, 132, 140, 142,
252,259
Bombinatoridae, 302
Boophis, 14, 34, 38,41,44,216,
332,334
Brachycephalidae, 302
Brachycephalw, 172,302
Brachpamphrys, 318
Breviqs, 172, 174,319
d p m u s , 57, 174, 178, 180,
181,280
fiscus, 178
Brevicipitinae, 319
Bryobatrachus, 172,324
nimbus, 13
Buergeria, 332
buergeri, 57
Buergeriinae, 331
Buf, 2, 3, 13, 14, 19,26,29,
31, 37,42, 50, 51,92, 101,
104, 107, 111, 112, 150,
155,163,164, 172,184,
191, 196, 198, 199,200,
206,207,221,225,226,
227,228,229, 231,232,
235,236,246,254,256,
261,265,269, 270,271,
272,273,274,275,276,
277,292,295,297,298,
302,303,334
americanw, 56,61,145, 195,
198,203, 204, 205, 206,
207,221,223,224,225,
226,230, 232, 233,234,
235,236,237, 238,239,
244,246,252,256,259,
260,262,263,264,268,
269,270,271, 274,275,
276,277,284
angwticeps, 56
arenamm 144,262
bweas, 146,203,207,230,
231, 232, 233, 234, 235,
236,238,261,262
buf, 56,92,93,97, 104, 106,
107, 109, 111, 112, 114,
115, 119, 121, 123, 131,
132, 135, 136, 137, 138,
140, 142, 143, 144, 147,
168, 196, 197, 198,212,
225,238,244,245,247,
262,263,269,297
calamita, 104, 111, 112, 115,
117, 119, 121, 123, 125,
244,246,250,258,263,
266,269,271,284
canoms, 1,203,204,207
cavfrons, 297
debilis, 50, 303
ewul, 203,204
f m s u s , 135
gaparimns, 137
haematiticus, 184
hemiuphrys, 203,207
japonicwfmms, 140, 142,
143,144,145
lentiginosw, 56
macro&atw, 297
maculahts, 228
marinus, 97, 136, 140, 154,
160,202,203,204,205,
206,207,217,246,247,
258,260,262,265,266,
272,276
melanomctus, 56,246
pentoni, 182
punctatus, 207,266
regularir, 56,69,70,77,84,
92,142,163
spinhsus, 56
stomaticus, 246
terveh, 158, 193, 194,
199, 200, 203, 205, 207,
209, 221, 226, 253, 273,
274
valliEep, 10,260
vevaguensis, 27, 297
viridh, 56, 135, 137, 213,
252,269,275
vulgans, 56
woodbousii, 193, 194, 196,
199, 201, 203, 204, 205,
223, 224, 232, 242, 243,
247, 250,256,259,263,
271,276,334
woodbousii@leri, 223,244,
273,274,281,292
Bufides, 303
Bufonidae, 302
Camstemum, 327
Callixalw, 312
Calluella, 320
Callulina, 172,319
Callulops, 172, 319
Calyptahyla, 308
Calyptocephalusgayi, 58
Cambams bartonii, 254
Candida humicola, 255,256
Capensibuf, 303
Cardwglossa, 26, 37, 301, 334
gracilU; 334
Caudiverbera, 3 16
caudiverbera, 55,61, 132
Centvolene, 14, 304
buckleyi, 297
Centrolenidae, 304
Ceratobatrachus, 172,175, 177,
178, 179, 180,328
guentheri, 175, 180
Ceratophryinae, 314
Ceratophrys, 13,36, 314, 334
comuta, 34,45, 55, 61,299,
300,334
cranwelli, 55
Chaophrys, 314,334
pierotci, 27,247,334
Chaparana, 329
Chaperina, 320
Chiasnwcleis, 320
Chirixalus, 186, 332
dmiae, 297
ezfingeri, 217,219, 332
idiootocus, 183
vittatus, 297
Chiroieptes, 56
Chiromanth, 227, 332
m&scens, 227,297
Chlorella, 255
Chlorolius, 3 12
Choerophryne, 172,320
Chrysemyspicta, 261
Chrysobatrachus, 312
Cochranella, 14,26, 304, 334
granulosa, 218, 334
gnfithsi, 299
uranoscopa, 334
Colostethus, 172, 173, 305, 334
albgularlr, 306
chaicopti, 173
pOtatov, 334
haydeeae, 297
nexipus, 220
nubicola, 13,51,57,299,305
semiguttata, 297
stephani, 173
subpunctatus, 57, 221,297
trinitatis, 57, 334
ii,hymperi, 112
Conraua, 14,51,329
Caphixalus, 172, 174, 320
parkeri, 174
Caphyla, 172, 174, 320
phyllo*la,
174
Cophylinae, 319
Copiula, 172, 320
fwtulans, 177
Corythomantis, 308
Crepzdophryne, 172,303
Crinia, 324
deserticola, 266
riparia, 269,270
signifera, 258,262,269,270,
271
~rossod&lus, 111, 112,314
Cryptobatrahus, 112, 113, 172,
173.307
fih&nni, 173,179
Cryptobranchus, 198
alleganiensis, 196
Cryptothyhx, 312
Ctenuphryne, 321
Culiseta longiareolata, 275
Cycloramphus, 14,28, 172,228,
3 17,342
bwaceienk, 317
duseni, 107, 113
stejnegeri, 55,179
valae, 27, 317
Cyclorhamphus culeus, 56
Cyclorana, 310, 334
australis, 112
brevipes, 266,267
cultnpes, 202, 334
novaehollandiae, 266,267
platycephala, 56,202
Cynops spyrvhgas~er,93
Dactylethra cape+ 55
Da.sypops, 321
Dendrobates, 13, 187, 305,334
auratus, 57,220, 221
histrioninrs, 219
pumilw, 219, 247
quinquivittntus, 334
speciosus, 2 19
tinctonus, 33, 57
Dendrobatidae, 305
Dendrophryniscus, 185, 303
minutus, 183
Dermatonotus, 32 1
muell* 57
Desmognathus ochrophaeus, 25 1,
282
Didynamipus, 172, 173,303
sjoestedti, 173
Dimiphognathus, 328
Dischidadtutylus, 172, 317
Discodeles, 172, 180, 329
opisthodan, 179
Discoglossidae, 306
Disc~lossus,53, 54, 59,62,63,
70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 112,
132,306,334
gabanoi, 269
pictus, 4, 55, 70,92, 111, 132,
135, 136, 137, 138, 142,
143,144,146,197,334
sardus, 55
Drosophila, 186
Duellmanohyla, 14,41, 308, 334
salvada, 334
uranochroa, 299, 300
Dyscophiinae, 320
Dyscophus, 320
Dytiicus, 25 1, 260
lapponicus, 262
verticalis, 260,262,263
Edulorhina, 315
Ehchistocieis, 321
ovalzs, 31
Ehchyglossa, 329
Eleuthero~lus,13, 51, 153,
171, 172, 173, 175, 178,
179, 180, 181, 182, 183,
184,317
abbotti, 173
antiliensis, 180
atkinsi, 173
audanti, 173
augusti, 173
cooki, 173
coqui, 16, 55, 171, 172, 174,
177, 178, 179, 180, 181,
186, 187, 188
comutus, 174
dimidiatus, 174
fwlen, 174
gossei, 174
gurnthen, 178, 180
hazelae, 179
hedvicki, 174, 179
imptatus, 174, 179
jasp*
13, 174, 183
TAXONOMIC INDEX
johnstwi, 174, 175, 180
martinicensis, 137, 174, 178,
180,181
mtyeri, 179
nasutus, 174, 178, 180
nubtwla, 55, 172, 174, 178,
180
parvus 174
pahciae, 174
planiroh, 174, 178
pmtmicensis, 174,180
ricordi, 181, 182
ridens, 2 18
thorectes, 174
unistnigatus, 175
u d i , 179
variam, 174
varieyi, 174
wetmwei, 174
Epipedobates, 305
anthonyi, 57
boulengeri, 57
femmalis, 275, 276
tricoiar, 57
Ericabatmhus, 328
Euparkerella, 172, 3 17
Euphlyds, 329
yanophlyctis, 142,143,199,
247
hexadactylus, 44, 56, 143, 145
Eupsophus, 13, 172, 174, 317
roseus, 174, 179
taeniatus, 174
vittatus, 174, 179
Eurycea, 290,294
Flectonotus, 13, 113, 172, 173,
178,180, 184,307
jissilis, 31
Jitzgeraldi, 173, 184
goeldii, 56, 173, 184
ohausi, 173
~gmaeus,173,175
F d u s , 172, 303
Gallus, 93
Gambusia, 260,263
ajinis, 263
Gasterosteus acuieatus, 260
Gashophym, 206,216,321,322
carolinensis, 22,28, 31, 32,47,
57,67,68, 202, 203, 204,
205,224,253, 267, 291,
299
usta, 57
Gashophrynoides, 172,321
Gasti-otheca, 13,22,34,73, 74,
75, 111, 112, 113, 171,
172, 173, 179, 180, 182,
186, 187, 188,290, 307,
340
ceratophyes, 173, 185
chmktiani, 173
emestoi, 173
espeleh, 56
gracilis, 56, 181
marsupiata, 56
wophylax, 56
myera, 173
peruana, 56
pseustes, 56
bwbeba, 42
boans, 247
bogotensis, 34
bmmeliacia, 13,48,217, 299,
334
celata, 297
chrysoscelis, 30, 38, 41, 46, 224,
246, 253,254,261,262,
263, 264,266, 272,273,
274,276,277,286
c i m a , 30, 56, 158, 161,229,
254,258,268,282,284,
286
dendroscaea, 48, 112
ebraccata, 112
femoralis, 30,45, 223, 259,
260,272,276,285
geographica, 40, 132,231, 232,
238,247,261
jratiosa, 38, 39,223,250,
253,258,259,260,262,
272,273, 274,276,282,
284,285,286
iuncz@rmis, 56,78
iegleri, 88
hcophyllata, 13, 26,28, 31,
37,44,50,297
lindae, 299, 300
iaquax, 297
marmorata, 13,28, 37
meridionalis. 269
microcepha~,13,37,56,217,
299,300
minuta, 41
nana, 37,56
parviceps, 13, 37,297
phlebodes, 112
puuoi, 71, 334
piees, 44,45
plaiydapla, 297
pseudopuma, 219,246, 247,
251,262,266
pulchella, 56,257
riimlaris, 299,300
rosenbergi, 56
rujtela, 112
sarayacuensis, 47, 112, 334
siopela, 297
squirella, 56,258,284
verstwiar, 30,224,253,263,
264,276
zeteki, 13, 71,247, 297
Hyiurana, 29
Hylidae, 306
Hylinae, 307
Hyiades, 315
Hylodinae, 3 14
Hyiamantis, 311
Hylophwbus, 172,319
Hylorina, 317
Hymenochirus, 63, 74, 75, 76,
216,219,326,334
boettgm; 13, 55, 61,63, 70,
71, 72, 84, 87, 88,90, 104,
113,125,127,247
curtipes, 334
Hyophym, 172,321
Hyperoliidae, 311
Hyperoliinae, 311
Hperolius, 312
marmoratus taeniatus, 252
picturatus, 297
vindzfimrc, 252
v. nitidulus, 252
v. m m a t o ~ u s 252
,
Hpopachw, 322
aldmenter, 322
barbm; 57
varioiasw, 57
Indirana, 51,329
beddarei, 228
jundia, 13
ieithii, 228
Ingerana, 329
Insuetopbqmus, 3 17,334
urpicw, 334
Ischnomema, 172, 317
Iblophrynus, 172,297,322
pleurostiigma, 174
Kaloula, 230, 322
bwealis, 245
pulchra, 33, 158,230
mg@ra, 297
Kassina, 13, 28, 313, 334
maculata, 297
senegalensis, 28, 30,44297,
334
Kassininae, 3 13
I(asinula, 313
K w a n w . 172.174.324
Lunzarana, 329
Lutes calcarifer,262
Lutimeria, 290
Luurentophyne, 172,303
parkeri, 173
Lebiasina panamensis, 262
Lechriodus, 324
jktcheri, 13,247
Leiopelma, 52, 53,54, 59,63,89,
172, 173, 178, 183, 187,
290,294,3 13
archtyi, 13, 55,63, 173, 180
hamiltuni, 13,173,180
hochstetteri, 55, 173, 180
Leiopelmatidae, 313
Lcpuiobatr~us,31, 38,42,44,
219,296,314,334,340
W s , 25, 32, 55, 113, 127,
314
Uanensis, 33,55, 314, 334
Lepomis
yanelus, 262,263
mamochirus, 262,263,264
Leptobrachella, 3 18,334
gracilii, 334
mjobergi, 297
Leptobrachium, 3 18
gradis, 297
hasselti, 55, 112, 297, 334
hendricksonii, 297
montanum, 135, 144
n&rops, 334
Leptodactyhdae, 313
Leptodactylinae, 315
Lqtodaqiadon, 13,27,301,334
venhmannoratus, 44
Leptodaqlus, 13, 30, 183,201,
231,255,315,334
442
Leptoductylus (continued)
albilabns, 66, 132,203,204
bolivianus, 2 19
bujbnius, 132
chaquensis, 42, 55
knudseni, 112,265
melamnotus, 334
mystaceus, 227
ocellatus, 55
pentndqlus, 55,93,217,
247,315,334
w a g d , 112
Leptolah, 318
gracilis, 48, 135, 144
Leptopelinae, 313
Leptopelis, 227,228, 313, 334
hykdes, 227,299
natalensis, 228, 334
Leptophryne, 303,334
borbunicll, 334
Lethocerus amencanus, 262
Leucwvhinea dubia, 262
Libellula herculea, 262
Limnodynastes, 272, 324
m t u s , 246, 247,257,258,
262,266,272
peronii, 55,209
tasmaniensis, 55,266
Limnodynastinae, 323
Limmmedusa, 317
Limmnectes, 329
cancrivms, 132,202,203,
210,213
kwalensis, 142
w o d o n , 297,298
mierodisca, 229, 298
paramacrodon, 298
Lithodytes, 315
Litwia, 29, 36,38,41,44,88,
267,310
alboguttata, 112,266
buolar, 266
mmlea, 266
citropa, 4 1
ewingi, 106, 197,256, 262
f a l h , 266
genimaculata, 248,264,269,
270,271
gracilenta, 266
inennis, 266, 272
nannohs, 248,269
nasuta, 266
nyakalemis, 297
rothi, 266
rubella, 202,247,266
subglandulasa, 37, 38,41
xanthomera, 264
Lysapsus 34, 327
TAXONOMIC INDEX
bicalcaratus, 297
brevipalmatus, 297
curtus, 297
femoralis, 334
guttulatus, 38, 51
lugubris, 44,45, 51,219,332,
334
opiparus, 13,334
pulcher, 228
ulcerosw, 297
Mantophrp, 172,319
Megmlosiu, 315
goeldii, 42
Megalopepus caerulatus, 262
Megktolahs, 324
lignaks, 112
Megophtyidae, 318
Megophrys, 13, 36,51,61, 171,
172,319,334
montana, 55,222,239,299,
300
nasuta, 55, 135, 144
pawa, 55
robusta, 55
stejngeri; 55
Melanobatrachinae, 320
Mehbatrachus, 172,320
Melanophryniscus, 303
Menstogenys, 14, 29,227,329,
330
orphmcnemis, 45
phaeomms, 298
poecilw, 298
Mertensophyne, 13.27,303
Metacrinia, 325
Metaphrynella, 31, 322
Metaphryniscus, 172, 303
Mimzalus, 330
Mimbatrachella. 297. 328
berdmorei, 112
bomeensis, 297
heymonsi, 13, 31, 37, 51, 112,
222,334
omata, 57,263
pulchra, 57, 67,68
Microhylidae, 319
Microhylinae, 321
Mieropterus salmoides, 260
Minyobates, 305
Mixophyes, 324
fasc~latus,55
schhlli, 248, 269, 270
Myersiella, 172, 174, 322
microps, 174
Myobatrachidae, 323
Myobatrachinae, 324
Mvobatrachw, 172, 175, 179,
Nannophrys, 28,51,330
ceylanensis, 14, 34, 228
Nanmrana, 330
Natalabatrachus, 328
Nectophyne, 172,173,303
afia, 173,231
Nectaphrynoides, 171, 172, 173,
179, 180, 181, 183, 184,
303
pybumi,9, 14,31,33,37,50,
57,218,219,297,298,334
robusta, 57,297
Oxyglssus, 56
Pna, 330
Padymedusa, 311
dunzicolar, 14, 87
Palmatwappiu, 172,330
Pandanus, 228
Pantalafivescens, 260, 26 1, 262
Parmassina, 313
Paracriniu, 325
Paradoxophyla, 323
palmata, 14, 31
Paratelmatobiw, 315
lutzii, 112,297
Parhopiupbryne, 172,320
Pedostipes, 303
Pelabates, 13, 54,61, 67,68, 70,
71, 72, 73, 74, 75,81, 111,
112,269,325
cultripes, 246
jscw, 4, 53, 55, 71, 75,80,
84, 107, 112, 115,135,
136,138,248,269
syriacus, 55, 68, 269
Pelobatidae, 325
Pelodryadinae, 310
Peladryas, 310
Peladytes, 53, 58, 71, 75, 76,77,
267,326,334
punctatw, 55,107,246,334
Pelodytidae, 326
Pelophryne, 13, 172,304
bvevipes, 173, 179
Peltophryne, 304
Petropedetes, 14,28,228,328
camunemis, 228
natatm, 328
parkeri, 228,239
Petropedetinae, 327
Phmahvla. 3 11.334
gryllw, 123,125,130
hosii, 175
lissobrachiw, 175
schmacheri, 175
vanabilis, 57,297
Philana, 13, 172, 174, 179, 180,
183, 184,267,324
fiosti, 174
Phlyctimantis, 313
leonardi, 297
Phvynella, 172,322
Phvynobatrachus, 37,328
natalensis, 143
Phrynodon, 13,172,184,328
Phrynoglossus, 229,330
Phrynohyas, 13,40,308,310
resinijifirrclc,217,218
Phrynomantis, 67,84,86,323
annectans, 57,67, 84, 86
mierops, 261
Phvynomedusa, 311
Jimbnata, 13
TAXONOMIC INDEX
Phrynomerinae, 323
Phlynomerus, 57,67
annectens, 67
Phynqus, 172,317
Phylbbates, 306
bicolov, 57
IugubnS, 34
Phyllodrtes, 308
Phyllomedusa, 14,29, 111, 231,
261,311,334
boliviana, 56
sauvagii, 56, 132, 140, 144
tarsius, 238
tomoptema, 275, 276
trinitatis, 56, 84, 261
vaillanti, 232, 247, 334
Phyiiomedusinae, 3 11
Pihyllonastes, 172, 317
Physaiuemw, 29, 261,262, 315
pctersi, 316
pustulosus, 56, 261,262,291
Phyzelaphyze, 172,317
Pipa, 13, 14,63, 71, 72, 73, 74,
75, 79,90, 113, 172, 175,
178,180,187,326
americana, 55
awabali, 266
cawalhoi, 55, 61, 71, 132
monstrosa, 55
pawa, 55,71
p$a,55,71,74,75,175, 179,
180,187
Pipidae, 326
Pipinae, 326
Pitangw sulphuratus, 262
Platymantis, 13, 172, 175, 178,
180,331
guentheri, 175,178
hazaiue, 175
mqeri, 175
pelewensis, 181
Phtypelis, 172, 174, 320
grandi, 174
Plectrohyla, 14,309
ixil, 44, 45
matudai, 44
teuchestes, 297
Pietbodontohyla, 172, 174, 184,
320
inpinalts, 177
notostida, 174
Pleurodema, 34, 316
bibronii, 56
burellii, 56, 262
cinerea, 112
Polypedates, 333, 334
ieucomystm, 147,158
mamotis, 298,333
mulatus, 245
megacephala, 334
otibphus, 333
Pqvntonia, 328
paludicola, 28,29
Probrepiceps, 172, 319
Proceratophys, 3 14
Prototheca, 253
richardri, 255
Pseudacti, 12, 13,29,206, 229,
271,273,276,309
hacLyphona, 297
crtrcifer, 30,41,56,61, 207,
australis, 55
bibronii, 55, 112, 194,262,
270
semimammata, 270
Psyllophv, 172,302
Pternohyla, 309
fodiens, 297
Pqchadena, 331, 334
anchietae, 297
oxyihynchus, 297
Ptycbohyla, 14,111,112,309
leonhardschulizei, 111, 112
Pyrrhulina, 262
Pyxicephalus, 231,331
adspersus, 219,231,247
331'
agilis, 56
albohbris, 297
alticoh, 30
amurensis, 246
areolata, 262
awalis, 115,259,262
aumva, 229,230,232,233,
234, 235,236,248,251,
252
berlandieri, 41, 192, 193, 194,
195, 198,209,223,224,
226,261
boylii, 88, 207, 23 1
wcadae, 203,205,206,207,
443
209, 211, 214, 223,224,
231, 233, 234,235, 236,
237,239,244,247,251,
254, 255,256, 263, 270,
271,272,273,292, 297
pleshi, 298
pomsa, 144
pretiosa, 232,233, 234,235,
236,252,270
pwtlrlosw, 14
ridibuma, 93,97, 101, 106,
123, 125, 127, 129, 136,
137,140,142,144,145,
160,255,269,271
rugosa, 140, 144
septenhionaiis, 225, 226,239
sphenocephaia, 28,42,45, 193,
194, 199,200,203,205,
206,207,209,223,232,
242,244,247,253,255,
sylvatica, 4,8, 87, 88, 107,
111, 135, 137, 145, 202,
203,204, 205, 208, 209,
211,216,217,219,223,
224, 230, 233, 234,235,
236,239,244,247,249,
251,252, 253, 254, 255,
256,257,260,262, 263,
271,272,273,274,281,
284,286,287,288,291
temporaria, 53, 56, 57, 58,
59,61, 64,65, 67,68,69,
70,72,73, 74,75,77, 80,
93, 94, 101, 104, 105,
106, 107, 108, 109, 111,
444
Rhinodemza (contznued)
da+nii, 56, 131, 175, 184
rufum, 131
Rhinodermatidae, 333
Rhinophrynidae, 333
Rhinaphlynus, 14, 33,38,59,
61,63,71, 75,90, 108,
109, 112, 115,333, 334,
340
domalis, 33,47,53,55,63,88,
112,201,216, 217,231,
232,247,298,334
Rhombophyne, 172,174,320
testudo, 174
Salmo clarbii, 260
Scaphiophyne, 33,36,38,44, 51,
107, 111, 112, 123, 179,
319,323,334
Scaphiophryninae,323
Scaphiopus, 13, 55,67,68, 72,
73, 206, 221, 229,231,
265,271,273,274,277,
288,297,325,334
couchii, 132,202,203,244,
252,258,259,263,271,
281,286,334
holbrookii, 32, 38, 55,87, 158,
201,203,204,247,250,
256,267,273,274,277
Scarthyiu, 36,297,309,334
omwdactyiu, 334
Schismaderma, 231, 304,334
carens, 27, 32, 334
Scinax, 13, 28, 309, 334
acuminata, 56
elaeochroa, 309, 334
nebulosa, 299
rostrata, 36, 50,297, 309
wbra, 28,50, 56,238, 309
stauffm; 217,246,309,334
sugiliuta, 309, 334
Scotobeps, 301
Scutuq 14,319
mammata, 298
S@brophys, 317
TAXONOMIC INDEX
Semnodactylus, 313
Silurana, 14,63,90,326
tvopicalis, 55, 61, 70, 71, 74
Szren, 36, 198,201,291
intermedia, 275
lace&'na, 193
Smilzsca, 111, 262, 309
phaeota, 262, 266
Somuncuria, 3 17
Sooglossidae, 333
Sooglossus, 172, 175, 183, 333
gardineri, 13, 175, 185, 186
secheensk, 13, 187, 229
Spea, 13,27,40,41,44, 55,61,
73,206,231,246,247,
297,325,326
bombtfins, 40,42,55,73,75,
78, 87, 88, 223, 247
hammondii, 203,210,247
intemntana, 230,232,234
multiplpliutta, 132, 230,246,
247,250,263,271
Speiaeaphqwe, 172,319
Sphammhynchus, 310
Sphagnum, 213
Sphenophyne, 172,320
Spicospina, 325
SpPzmphrynoUies,
304
Staurois, 36,41, 331
iutopalmatus, 298
natator, 29,227, 298
Stefania, 113, 172, 173, 307
goini, 179
sculue, 173
Stephopaedes, 28,303,304,334
anotis, 13,299, 334
Stweocyclops, 28, 31, 33, 319,
322
Stumpjh, 171,172,179,320
grandis, 174
Sympetwm n&rocentrum, 262
Synapturanus, 13, 172, 174,
323
salseri, 174
Syncope, 172, 174,323
ante*
174
Tachycneminae, 313
Tachycnemis, 3 13
sqchellensis, 183
T a u ~ 1 u s14,41,
,
325
Taylwana, 172, 331
Telmatobiinae, 316
Telmatobius, 318
bolivianus, 56
ceiorum, 56
C U ~ U S 56
,
jehkii, 56
iuticeps, 56
maniwratus, 56
pisanoz, 56
Telmatobuf, 34,318
australis, 227
Tepuzhyiu, 31O
Thamnapbis, 219
Theloa'mma, 13,333
wrinensis, 29
Thonpa, 14, 28, 111, 112,228,
318,334,342
miliaris, 27, 87, 107, 113,
218,334
Tmnoptema, 331
TracLycephalus,40, 308, 310
Trama, 274
carolina, 274
lucerta, 253,261,262,264
Trichobatvacbus,27,30 1, 334
robustus, 14,44, 334
Triprion, 310
Triturusaulgan, 262
Truebeliu, 172, 304
Uperodon, 31, 323
systoma, 57,142
Upwoieia, 13,267,325
lithomoda, 55,266
mimuiu, 266
Urtka, 22
Wernevia, 304,334
pvewsz, 334
Woltento@na, 172,304
Xenobatvachus, 172,319
Xenohyla, 30
Xenopodinae, 326
Xenapus, 8, 14, 16, 24,25,28,
29, 31, 34, 38, 54,63,70,
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 77, 79,
80, 84, 86, 87, 88,90,92,
103, 104, 107, 112, 113,
115, 117, 119, 121, 123,
125, 127, 131, 132, 136,
137,138,140,144,145,
146, 150, 153, 154, 155,
157, 159,163,164,165,
168,216,221,224,225,
The Universi!
P Chicago Fk
I S B N 0-22b-SS7b2-