Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 8
CH 8
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
A. Branching pattern with dead end.
B. Grid pattern
C. Grid pattern with loop.
A. Branching Pattern with Dead End
Reservoir
Sub-main
Sub-main
Branches
Main (trunk) line
Advantages:
It is a very simple method of water distribution. Calculations are easy and simple to do.
The required dimensions of the pipes are economical.
This method requires comparatively less number of cut-off valves.
However, it is not usually favored in modern water works practice for the following
disadvantages.
Disadvantages:
The area receiving water from a pipe under repair is without water until the work is
completed.
In this system, there are large number of dead ends where water does not circulate but
remains static. Sediments accumulate due to stagnation of the dead end and bacterial
growth may occur at these points. To overcome this problem drain valves are provided
at dead ends and stagnant water is drained out by periodically opening these valves but
a large amount of water is wasted.
It is difficult to maintain chlorine residual at the dead ends of the pipe.
Water available for fire-fighting will be limited since it is being supplied by only one
water main.
The pressure at the end of the line may become undesirably low as additional areas are
connected to the water supply system. This problem is common in many less-developed
countries.
B. Grid Pattern
Reservoir
Main line
In grid pattern, all the pipes are interconnected with no dead-ends. In such a system,
water can reach any point from more than one direction.
Advantages:
Since water in the supply system is free to flow in more than one direction, stagnation
does not occur as readily as in the branching pattern.
In case of repair or break down in a pipe, the area connected to that pipe will continue to
receive water, as water will flow to that area from the other side.
Water reaches all points with minimum head loss.
At the time of fires, by manipulating the cut-off valves, plenty of water supply may be
diverted and concentrated for fire-fighting.
Disadvantages:
Cost of pipe laying is more because relatively more length of pipes is required.
More number of valves are required.
The calculation of pipe sizes are more complicated.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Diameter 80 mm.
For pipes with fire hydrants 100 mm.
If velocity < 0.6 m/sec (due to minimum diameter limit) then drain valve is used on
that pipe.
Minimum pressure at the top of the highest floor of a building is about 5m.
According to ller Bankas Regulation:
Population 50000 then (P/)min =20 m.
Q fire:
According to ller Bankas Regulation, fire flow and fire storage amount can be calculated as;
It is assumed that 1 fire with a duration of 2 hours then amount of water necessary for firefighting in the service reservoir:
It is assumed that 2 fires with a duration of 2 hours then amount of water necessary for firefighting in the service reservoir:
It is assumed that 2 fires with a duration of 5 hours then amount of water necessary for firefighting in the service reservoir:
Fire hydrants are used on sub-mains to provide a connection for fire hoses to fight fire.
Fire hydrants should be located at easily accessible locations.
In Turkey, length of fire hosed is about 50-75m. Therefore, distance between fire
hydrants is about 100-150m.
Sub-mains should be divided into sections and valves should be provided in each, so that
any section may be taken out of operation for repairs. For this purpose, gate valves are
usually used.
3 gate valves are used at all crosses.
2 gate valves are used at al tees.
To remove air from pipelines or to allow automatic air entrance when the pipeline is
emptied (in order to prevent vacuum), air release and relief valves are placed at high
points.
A) Dead-End Method
Determine the locations of "dead-ends" providing that water will be distributed in the
shortest way. At the dead-end points there will be no flow distribution.
Dead-end
Dead-end
Reservoir
Loop system
Branch system
Deadend
Qbegin
Qend
To apply dead-end method for loop systems, convert it to branch system. To do this, a
dead-end point is identified for each loop. The location of dead end point is chosen such
that distance travelled to reach dead-end point from 2 different directions will almost
equal to each other. Because; in a closed loop
3
1.5
3
4
1.75
3.5
5
2
4
(Leq)i = k. Li
Diameter of each pipe is selected providing that velocity should be in the range.
Head losses through each pipe is calculated by using Darcy-Weisbach or Hazen-Williams
equation.
where
HL calculation according to Hazen-Williams:
where
Piezometric elevations and pressures are calculated. To do this; water level in the
reservoir and diameter and length of the main line have to be known.
B) Hardy-Cross Method
For a given pipe system, with known junction outflows, the Hardy-Cross method is an
iterative procedure based on initially estimated flows in pipes. Estimated pipe flows are
corrected with iteration until head losses in the clockwise direction and in the counter
clockwise direction are equal within each loop.
PROCEDURE:
1. Outflows from each node are decided.
2. Flows and direction of flows in pipes are estimated by considering the flow continuity
condition.
At each node;
3. Decide the sign of flow direction. Usually clockwise direction (+) and counter clockwise
direction (-). Use the same sign for all loops.
4. Diameters are estimated for the initially assumed flowrates knowing the diameter,
length and roughness of a pipe, headloss in the pipe is a function of the flowrate Q.
Applying Darcy-Weisbach
HL = K. Q2
Where
Applying Hazen-Williams
HL = K.Q1.85
Where
for SI units.
Q
+0.001
Q new
0.1+0.001
-0.2+0.001
-0.3+0.001
0.4+0.001
1st loop Q1
+1
-x
+1-x-y
2nd loop
-1
-1+y+x
Q2
+y
6. Computational procedure is repeated until each loop in the entire network has negligibly
small corrections (Q).
Equivalent pipe is a method of reducing a combination of pipes into a simple pipe system for
easier analysis of a pipe network, such as a water distribution system. An equivalent pipe is
an imaginary pipe in which the head loss and discharge are equivalent to the head loss and
discharge for the real pipe system. There are three main properties of a pipe: diameter,
length, and roughness. As the coefficient of roughness, C, decreases the roughness of the
pipe decreases. For example, a new smooth pipe has a roughness factor of C = 140, while a
rough pipe is usually at C = 100. To determine an equivalent pipe, you must assume any of
the above two properties. Therefore, for a system of pipes with different diameters, lengths,
and roughness factors, you could assume a specific roughness factor (most commonly C =
100) and diameter (most commonly D = 8"). The most common formula for computing
equivalent pipe is the Hazen-Williams formula [1].
EXAMPLE: For the pipe system shown below (Figure 1), determine the length of a single
equivalent pipe that has a diameter of 8 inches. Use the Hazen Williams equation and
assume that CHW = 120 for all pipes. Solve the problem using the following steps: [2]
a. First determine an equivalent pipe (with D=8 in) for pipes #2 and #3 in series. Use a flow
of 800 gpm.
Use the Hazen Williams equation for Q in gpm and diameter in inches.
Use this to calculate the headloss in pipe 2 and pipe 3 (recognizing that the flow in pipe 3
must also be 800 gpm).
b. Second, determine an equivalent pipe for pipe #4 and the parallel equivalent pipe from
part (a). Use the head loss resulting from the flow for part (a) as the basis for determining
the equivalent pipe length (use D=8 in). What is the flow split between these two parallel
pipes? (i.e., for 800 gpm through the part (a) pipe, what is the flow in the parallel pipe, and
the total flow)
Now that we know the headloss from node B to node D is 39.73 feet, we can determine the
flow in pipe #4 by the H-W formula, rearranged as follows:
= 2526 gpm
Now the total flow between nodes B and D is then the sum:
QB-D = 2526 + 800 = 3326 gpm
Finally using the H-W equation, you can calculate an equivalent length of an 8 inch pipe that
gives the existing headloss with this flow:
= 203 ft
c. Finally, determine a single equivalent pipe (D = 8 in) for the three pipes in series, pipe
#1, the pipe from part (b), and pipe #5.
Next you can use the H-W formula to calculate the headloss in pipes #1 and #5, recognizing
that the flow in each must be the same as the flow determined for node B to node D (e.g.,
3326 gpm):
= 369 ft
d. Show that your pipe is hydraulically equivalent by calculating the head loss for this
single pipe and comparing it to the sum of the head losses for pipes in the original system.
Recalculate the headloss in each of the original pipes. Sum the headloss from each node to
the next one, recognizing that there are two ways of getting from node B to node D (use
either one, but not both).
References:
[1]http://www.rpi.edu/dept/chem-eng/Biotech-Environ/Environmental/HYDROLOGY/eq_pipe.html
[2] http://www.ecs.umass.edu/cee/reckhow/courses/371/371hw03/371hw03s.pdf