Military leaders helped Brazil's economy to increasingly grow with the use of foreign investment. One-party rule in mexico helped to improve life for peasants' handworkers. In argentina, the government generals were so disgraced that they stepped down.
Military leaders helped Brazil's economy to increasingly grow with the use of foreign investment. One-party rule in mexico helped to improve life for peasants' handworkers. In argentina, the government generals were so disgraced that they stepped down.
Military leaders helped Brazil's economy to increasingly grow with the use of foreign investment. One-party rule in mexico helped to improve life for peasants' handworkers. In argentina, the government generals were so disgraced that they stepped down.
1. What role did the military play in shaping the economy of Brazil?
Military leaders helped Brazils economy to increasingly grow
with the use of foreign investment, and began projects to help develop and improve conditions Amazon jungle, leaving the economy in a good place. 2. What were some of the positive benefits of one-party rule in Mexico? President Lazaro Cardenas did his best to improve life for peasants handworkers. #e carried out land reforms and promoted labor rights. He also helped to improve the Mexican oil industry. 3. What effect did the Falklands war have on the military government in Argentina? After being defeated by Britain, the government generals were so disgraced that they stepped down. Argentines then had their first free election since 37 years,electing Raul Alfonsin as their president, who worked to rebuild the economy and a democracy. Following Alfonsin, Carlos Menem was later elected as president,and he continued this process. Economic problems still intensified in the late 1990s, leaving the country struggling. 4. Review the chart of Population Living in Poverty [a] In which three countries of Latin America is the percentage of people living in poverty the lowest? Bolivia, Colombia, and Ecuador. [b] In which three countries is the poverty rate highest? Chile, Argentina, and Uruguay.
5. After reading this excerpt, in your opinion, has the military
dictatorships in Latin America nations been bad or good for the nations' growth? Explain your answer in two paragraphs [minimum]. I think that it has done them worse. When looking at the graphs i see that majority of the nations are high in the poverty range. All the wars and dictatorships that went on caused their economy to be a mess. Also, i see that many of the civilians rebelled against the leaders by forming their own parties or social groups.When Peron was in office he seemed to be more worried about his popularity while his wife was still alive and after she died he went dark and killed 30,000+ of his own people by having the government kill them secretly. This ended up causing chaos in the Latin American countries too. a. Brasilia- The new capital given to Brazil. This was changed in order to help with the development projects that Juscelino Kubitschek had for Brazil. b. Land reform-Breaking up large estates and distributing that land to peasants. This plan was opposed by Kubitcheks successors to ease economic and social problems. c. Standard of living-Level of material comfort which is determined by the amount of goods people have. This was a downside to the economy during the Amazon jungle reforms. d. Recession-A slowdown in the economy. e. PRI-Institutional revolutionary party that was the main force for political stability in Mexico.
f. NAFTA-North American Free Trade Agreement- This removed
trade barriers between Mexico, the United States, and Canada. g. Nationalization of an industry h. Welfare state-a government that tries to provide for all its citizens needs including health, education, and employment.