Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brinch Hansen - A General Formula For Bearing Capacity
Brinch Hansen - A General Formula For Bearing Capacity
FOR DE TEKNISKE
VIDENSKABER
GEOTEKNISK INSTITUT
THE DANISH GEOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE
BULLETIN No. 11
J. BRINCH HANSEN
COPENHAGEN 1961
w w w
g e o
d k
624.131.5:624.15
// is by now generally accepted, that the hearing capacity of a foundation depends, not
only on the properties of the soil, but also on the dimensions, shape and depth of the
foundation area, as well as on the inclination and eccentricity of the foundation load.
The most practical way of taking these effects into account consists in generalizing Terzaghi s bearing capacity formula by multiplying each of its terms with a shape-,
a depth- and an inclination factor. The eccentricity is accounted for by making the
calculation for the effective foundation area only.
Preliminary formulas of this type were proposed by the author in 1955 for the
two special cases of <p = 0 (clay) and c 0 (sand). In the present paper a general
formula is indicated, and the different factors are studied, especially in regard to their
dependence on the friction angle of the soil. As a result, approximate empirical formulas and corresponding diagrams are given for the bearing capacity-, inclination-,
depth- and shape factors.
Finally, new definite rules are proposed for determining the effective and
equivalent foundation areas as well as the contact pressure distribution.
1. Introduction.
In 1955 the author published a Danish paper [ 1 ] , in
which he proposed two simple, semi-empirical formulas
for the calculation of the bearing capacity, of foundations,
on clay (p = 0 ) and on sand {c 0) respectively. In
the first case the formula was an extension of Skempton's
[ 2 } , whereas in the latter case the formula was new but
based, of course, on Terzaghi's original formula [ 3 ] . The
formulas covered the general case of eccentric and inclined
loads on foundation areas of any shape at any depth.
In his General Report on Foundations [4} to the
London Conference in 1957 the author cited these two
formulas but without giving any details.
In 1958 [5} the author extended his formulas to the
case of simultaneous friction and cohesion, so that the
long-term bearing capacity of clays could be calculated.
In 1959 [ 6 ] and I960 [ 7 ] he found it necessary to
revise the expression for the inclination factor in the
case of p = 0 .
Lately arid partly due to a request from Professor
E. Schultze in Aachen further investigations have been
made by the author and The Danish Geotechnical Institute,
especially concerning the inclination factors. As a result,
the original formulas have now been revised as described
in the following.
2. The general formnla.
Terzaghi [ 3 } proposed as the first the following simple
formula for the bearing capacity Q oi a centrally and ver-
38
Q : B = ^ y B N r + qNq + cNc
(1)
w w w
g e o
d k
aou
mfi-t 11
300 1 1
Q : B L = y B N y sy dy i y + q N q s t d q i q + c N e s c d c ic
(4)
However, the q- and the c-factors are interrelated. If
we have found a solution for the special case of (y = 0,
q 1, c = 0), it can be shown [ 9 ] , that the solution for
the more general case of (y = 0, q ^ O , c = 0) is obtained by first multiplying all loads and stresses by
{q + c cot if) and then subtracting c cot p from all normal
loads and stresses (but not from the tangential ones). This
means that instead of (4) we can write:
Q-.BL = ^ B N
s r d y iy
I I I I
(5)
160 t
(8)
(9)
|'
| 1
t t t
t ~
cL
h-t
- v
iA
r
77n
-- -- -- F V-
-F - ' f t A
,-v X- v Fk- F-F - - F - W - , t \
__pt
p _ t r , rr r
, _r
J-JIJLA
t t"t
"
30 r t T F
F l-x - s/W v
__."C_L.L_.,zz^^_..t::: j
L"F FI - hk - tt-L*-,^u-t -J
in l F FF ' i t F^r 1W \ \ 1
2o
Li L 11
L L xLL
urr tL ^ JCW^
J-^ui- uu Lt Ltt Jd
is\xx
tt 'tax
tt::tJ--FF i--K~Ml-xvi/xxXtx-Xx^
1 -y
o[-"["[.[.__
, ' . ' : . :- \ .t .l ^. sJ J ? :
L \- C \*'
L . A]
\-
t 11 -"
tF-F-F,F
- - - - - tu - i - ^ //JT^ - h Ft
tF -d
fflt
sFFt
t
i
u
i
x/tiX
-tttnt
Xx
xxxx
F
/ u/^
' F""
i"\
w
(7)
| | 1 i 1 1 11 |
7
1
oui
11 'itit
t F i T11
i 'Xtt vt tvi t--ttttttii--^t 11
/-/ / J
s o t t i t r ' T t r ' F ' Ft-FFFF--F-F-t^2^" j
V-/-
1 _: y / -
+ (c + q t & n f ) N c s c d c i c + q
N c = (Nq-l)cot<P
I ,-
L t F
1201- F F t - '
,00
v v VV
,00
2
2
Q:BL=yBNrsrdrir
EP"'3
t t r F F F -F FFu-1
MotPI
Lttt-XLL--[---OI-[[[[t-[--[-[---[[
i
t Z
__. t - _-P - - C - t J.4A
17
+ ( q + c cot f ) N q sg dq iq - c c o t f
r r r T T T ' T 1:
IMTTT
LL
t-tjz
..
z t
: t
.._L.
t t
L::zQ:::::::z::si;::_
-tt
n
' LC^ v :::::uFt
t t t t : - - tL - - tF4<ft
wl^l X
z.[.t_-...:^LL..[._..i[[.[__..L_._tjl
5
10
1^
2(f
25
30
3!f
f
cf
tig. 1. Bearing capacity factors
Volume 5
39
w w w
g e o
d k
Table 1.
N
0.0
2.5
5.0
7.5
10.0
12.5
15.0
17.5
20.0
22.5
25.0
27.5
30.0
32.5
35.0
37.5
40.0
42.5
45.0
0.0000
0.0198
0.0894
0.229
0.467
0.844
1.419
2.275
3.54
5.39
8.11
12.12
18.08
27.04
40.7
61.9
95.4
149.9
241.0
<,
1.000
1.252
1.568
1.966
2.471
3.11
3.94
5.01
6.40
8.23
10.66
13.94
18.40
24.58
33.3
45.8
64.2
91.9
134.9
5.14
5.76
6.49
7.34
8.34
9.54
10.98
12.71
14.83
17.45
20.72
24.85
30.1
37.0
46.1
58.4
75.3
99.2
133.9
1 .
tan ( a ^ ) = -:
(0 5
i-!L
+ ^ _
2B)
, tan
(12)
(13)
N - l
Incidentally, equations analogous to (13) will according to (6) apply also to the depth factors d and
the shape factors s.
c
40
N e tan
(14)
Be
2 a 0 + sin 2 a 0
= -2
(15)
1 -
(16)
7u
(17)
(18).
_
H
- Ac + V t z n ?
tan
(19)
1 -
V + Ac cot^J
( 20 )
w w w
g e o
d k
/.o
os
icN
o.t
N>
\
\
\
0.7
oe
\
\
\
\
oft
- ^
Vo*
\ S,
\
OA
s 30'
OJ
^ ^
02
^ ^ ^
H
Ac+Vtan(p ^
03.
0.0
0,0
\
\
03
02
OJ
OA
Oj
O,,S
0,7
0,S
0,9
1,0
0,0
03
0,2
0,3
0A
Cfi
0,6
07
0.S
Q9
1,0
5, Depth factors.
In practice, foundation level is always placed at a depth
D below surface level. This influences the bearing capacity
in two ways. First, q must now be interpreted as the effective overburden pressure at foundation level and, second, depth factors d must be introduced.
As regards d y , is should be calculated assuming c 0
and q 0. But this means that the earth above foundation
level should be considered cohesionless, weightless and
unloaded. It will then evidently contribute nothing to the
bearing capacity, so that we must have:.
'
dy=l
(22)
1 -
H
V + A c cot f
14
(21)
Volume 5
w w w
g e o
d k
1.0
0,9
V'
0,8
0.7
\
\
*
0.S
0,5
V
\
u
\
OA
10'
03
\
\
02
03
no
at
02
oj
o,*
os
os
0.7
oa
0.9
ip
0.0
0,0
V
y
H
V+Accot(p
\
30'
03
02
03
OA
0.5
0.6
_____
0,7
'Q'
0,9
QS
IjO
(D < B)
(23)
B
This formula is, therefore, a good approximation for
shallow foundations, but it cannot b used for caissons
or piles.
For great values of D : B it is evident that dc must
approach asymptotically a final value, which would be exd.
1 + 0.35
1 + B : D + 0.6 : (1 + 7 tan4 )
9
<o
dc V7
^
^
is
3.0
z7
- z:X
-4-/
2.0
-h ? '
J&
^
^
3.M
i^-"
T
^-^
7
^
-- t-t y^
s
/
/
1
2.5
^ -
" ^
_-s:--
ise
"
20*
"
~ m
O'-IO'
W?"
1.0
-/
B
20
4.-1
N c tan f + 1
(25)
)M3^^mM^
ft''
(24)
its
1,51
w w w
g e o
d k
2,0
6. Shape factors.
If, instead of an infinitely long strip foundation of
width B, we have a rectangular foundation area of width
B and length L (L ^ B ) , shape factors J- must be introduced in the bearing capacity formulas.
Unfortunately, theoretical calculation is extremely difficult in this 3-dimensional case. However, a certain
amount of empirical information can be derived from
model and full scale tests.
According to Skempton [ 2 ] , the following empirical
formula should be used for 9 = 0 :
J 0c
- 1 + 0 . 2 ^
(26)
L
From Meyerhof's Fig. 19 in [ 1 4 ] it appears that for a
circular foundation s q (which for sand is approximately
equal to s c ) should not be much greater than 1.2 for loose
sand, whereas it should exceed 2 for dense sand. According to his Fig. 20 the shape factor should vary, not only
with the friction angle, but also with the depth ratio D : B.
This, however, is due to Meyerhof's combination of the
y- and ^-terms. Actually, quite similar results are obtained
by using constant, but different shape factors for the yand ^-terms.
The simplest empirical formula, which covers the abovementioned evidence, is the following:
B
1 + (0.2 + tan , ) _
(27)
The upper part of Fig. 10 shows the values of s c
according to this formula.
When s c has been found, s q can be calculated by means
of a formula analoguous to ( 2 5 ) . However, for ^ ^ 25 it
will be sufficiently correct to assume s q ^ s c . For ip = 0
we have, of course, s = 1.
According to Meyerhof's Fig. 20 his combined shape
factor should be equal to 1 at D : B r - 0.25 for all
foundation shapes and all friction angles. This condition
will be very nearly fulfilled, if we assume:
1
/5
s y ^ 1 - (0.2 + tan<5 v )
(28)
The lower part of Fig. 10 shows the values of J-^ according to this formula. It will be noted that, for 9 ^ 37,
we have s = 0 . 8 for B = L. This agrees with Terzaghi's
indication of s y = 0.8 for a square foundation area on
sand [ 3 ] .
Q p : A p ~ (r + ^ t a n ? ) N c s c d c ~ ( c N c + q N q ) scde
(29)
1.9
/
/
i.e
//
17
IS
/
1.5
1,4
i0*P
s^ ^
=====,
OS
39Z-
^d ^xxx
L-
o-.ts"
- ^ r ^ ^ ^ :--"ZZZZZZZl J Z j p ^
^ ^
x " ^^ - ^
0.9
s /
^ /
S
--- ^
/
13
12
35'
iO1^
- ^
0.7
\
OS
V.
0.5
0,0
03
02
03
0A
05
OS
B
L
^fS'
0,7
os
os
to
s.o
S
H,
</
}&
(0'
/ .-
/
S
/
2P
/
^
y
j1
7/
555
-- ^
30
___^
"
^ - '
/
/
/.
Sc
B*|
3.37
/
/ '
^ ^ -^
y
30
Ss
X
s\
^-
y*
>j t -
' '
. '
^
,.,.
2.53
1__ 2.14
, 130
_
i
o'-itr
D
E3
tp
15
20
Volume 5
43
w w w
g e o
d k
44
w w w
g e o
d k
"
7:
For calculating the short-term bearing capacity the "undrained" parameters c = c u and ipu ( = 0 for fully sa-
13. Example.
A TV. transmission tower of reinforced concrete should
and f.
Finally, the foundation proper is designed for the nominal moments M n etc. with nominal stresses crn = df : fm,
where <T/ is the actual ultimate (or yield) strength of the
material.
In Denmark, the following values of the
different
fc = 1-75
= 1.2
V n = 3000 t
H n = 150- 1.5 = 225 t
'q n = 2.2 2.0 = 4.4t/m2
c n = 18 : 1.75 = 10,3 t/m2
~ n = 3 : 1.75 = 1.7t/m2
13. Calculation.
A design of a foundation according to the principles
set forth in this paper will usually proceed as follows.
After having estimated the depth and main dimensions
of the foundation, we calculate first the nominal foundation
load (components V n and H n ) , using the partial coefficients of safety indicated in section 11.
7 - 30
The eccentricity of the foundation load is 225 35 : 3000
= 2.63 m. Estimating the diameter of the foundation at
12 m the effective and equivalent foundation areas will be
as shown in the middle of Fig. 12. Here we find approximately B = 5.5 m and L = 9-0 ra.
= 0
N0 = 1
N0=5.1
9=
0:
d = 1 + 0 . 3 5 - 0 . 3 6 = 1.13
C
45
Volume 5
w w w
g e o
d k
-W
1-
225
= 0.87
5 . 5 - 9 . 0 - 10.3
N q = 18.5
N , = 30
s c = 1.15
i =
1 -
. . ."V,
I2
. _ . __ I = 0 . 8 6
i 7 = 0.862 = 0.74
i c = 0.86 -
1 - 0.
= 0.85
18.5 - 1
46
15. References.
[1] J. Brinch Hansen: Simpel beregning af fundamenters
breevne. Ingeniren, 22-1-1955.
[2] A. W. Skempton: The bearing capacity of clays. Proc.
Build. Res. Congr., London 1951.
[3] K. Terzaghi: Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New
York 1943.
[4] J. Brinch Hansen and Bent Hansen: Foundations of
structures. General Report, Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Soil
Mech., Vol. II, London 1957.
[5} H. Lundgren and J. Brinch Hansen: Geoteknik. Teknisk
Forlag, Copenhagen 1958.
[6] J; Brinch Hansen and J. Hessner: Geotekniske beregninger. Teknisk Forlag, Copenhagen 1959.
[7] J. Brinch Hansen and H. Lundgren: Hauptprobleme
der Bodenmechanik. Springer, Berlin I960.
[8] L. Prandtl: Uber die Harte plastischer Korper. Nachr.
der Ges. der Wiss., Gottingen 1920.
[9] J. Brinch Hansen: Earth pressure calculation. Teknisk
Forlag, Copenhagen 1953.
[10} H. Lundgren and K. Mortensen: Determination by the
theory of plasticity of the bearing capacity of continuous
footings on sand. Proc. Third Int. Conf. Soil Mech.,
Vol. I, Ziirich 1953.
[11] E. Schultze: Der Widerstand des Baugrundes gegen
schrge Sohlpressungen. Bautechnik 1952, Heft 12.
[12] G. G. Meyerhof: The bearing capacity of foundations
under eccentric and inclined loads. Proc. Third Int.
Conf. Soil Mech., Vol. I. Zurich 1953[13] J. Brinch Hansen: The internal forces in a circle of
rupture. Geoteknisk Institut, Bulletin No. 2, Copenhagen 1957.
[14] G. G. Meyer hof: The ultimate bearing capacity of
foundations. Gotechnique, Dec. 1951.
[15] J. Brinch Hansen: Simple statical computation of permissible pileloads. CN-Post No. 13, Copenhagen, May
1951.
[16] A. W. Skempton, A. A. Yassin and R. E. Gibson:
Theorie de la force portante des pieux dans le sable.
Ami. de ITnst. Techn. du Bat. et des Trav. Publ.,
Paris, Mars-Avril 1953.
[17] J. Brinch Hansen: Direkte fundering. In "Fundering",
Teknisk Forlag, Copenhagen I960.
[18] J. Brinch Hansen: Brudstadieberegning og partialsikkerheder i geoteknikken. Ingeniren, 11-5-1956 and
Geoteknisk Institut, Bulletin No. 1, Copenhagen 1956.
[19] J. Brinch Hansen: Definition und Grosse des Sicherheitsgrades im Erd- und Grundbau. Bauingenieur 1959,
Heft 3.
[20] G. G. Meyerhof: Influence of roughness of base and
ground-water conditions on the ultimate bearing capacity
of foundations. Gotechnique, Sept. 1955.
Ingeniren International Edition
w w w
g e o
d k