Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(GMITE09184)
Assignment
For
4 Analysis
of
Various
Options
in
the
light
of
Environmental and Situational issues and their Effects
Option 1) Overrule the suggestions given by the doctor and let my father
continue on life support till the time even that was not sufficient to sustain his
life.
Effects:
1.1) Another patient with a chance of improvement could potentially be
denied an ICU bed, leading us to indirectly become a party in loss of life.
1.2) It would not burden us with the guilt of being a party in hastening the
process of my fathers death.
1.3) Doctors might anyways withdraw his life support without it being
evident or visible. The practice is highly controversial, but it is known to
happen in government establishment where there is a scarcity of beds.
Option 2) Allow the doctors to shift him to the General Ward and await his
departure
Effects:
2.1) We would probably cut short his life span.
2.2) We would deny a chance of Miracle where he could probably come back
to life.
2.3) Probably inflict emotional trauma on my Mother, who could think of it as
relinquishing my duties towards my parents.
Option 3) Take him to another better facility or hospital at the risk of losing him
during the transit
Effects:
3.1)There was Amrita Institute in Kochi, around 60 KMs away where there are
better facilities.
3.2)Allow better facility and tests.
3.3) Given massive bleeding in the brain, moving him could endanger his life
even further and he may not be able to reach the new hospital at all.
3.4) It would give us a satisfaction that we did something that rather than
wait and watch
3.5) It would give our mother satisfaction that our family was able and
capable of taking care of a situation and discharging our duties.
The Theory of Justice and Theory of Rights came into play in points (a) and
(b) above. However, it was relatively easy for me to resolve since the weightage I
assign to my father is always more than that I assign to society, as long as it is
legal.
I assign (d) much more weightage, rubbishing any excuse of Luck. Also, most of
the times (c) and (d) would not conflict. However, in this case, the points (c) and (d)
above were in direct conflict and it was much difficult to resolve.
Initial Approach : Tell the doctors that matters of life and death are not for us to
decide and leave it upto them to take decision.
However, I soon realized that the doctors would themselves not take the decision
themselves, knowing that we have a doctor in our family and would exercise all the
precautions of ethics and ask us for explicit consent and actions.
Shifting of Weightage: Ultimately, I assigned the maximum weightage to (d) : Not
believing in Luck, believing in doing my duty and facing the consequences.
After some introspection, I also made myself understand that God will make
someone the medium of his actions, and if I were to endanger my fathers life due
to my actions, it would ultimately be according to Gods wish. In a way it was the
Ethical Rationalization that took place.
Final Decision:
Final Decision was to call up Amrita Institute at Kochi that was 60 KMs away,
secure an ICU bed at that hospital and transport my father in an ICU ambulance.
He made it alive and stable to the new hospital and more advance tests were
conducted at the new hospital. It was scientifically established that he is brain dead
and there was no chance of his recovery. He received terminal nursing care and
passed away in peaceful environment.