Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Matthew Korich
Matthew Korich
aquarium can be proud of (she mentions that world renown wetlands experts will be interested in
the kiosk on page 202.). Laura also seems to be concerned about ensuring that the kiosk is as
accurate as possible (she lets Lynn know about the various additional wetlands that would need
to be added under the types of wetlands section of the design document on p. 200 )
SME-Ben Williams
1. Primary concerns
Ben's concerns seem to be mostly about ensuring that the kiosk is accurate and interactive
so that more people can learn about the wetlands (that he gets incredibly excited about.) As the
SME Ben tries to ensure that Lynn has all the information she needs to make the final kiosk
product as educational as possible (he provides her with the pamphlets on the wetlands during
their first meeting, he discusses adding information about the aboriginal people, and he is very
interested in having an interactive way to discuss the threats to the wetlands requesting a game or
other interactive animation.)
Audience-Aquarium Patrons
1. Primary concerns
The aquarium's patrons will be the ones who will be using the kiosk while visiting the
park, as such their key concerns would be usability. Patrons will want an interactive experience
that is simple to use and doesn't require too much of their time (with few kiosks available a long
user experience could result in many patrons skipping over the kiosk altogether as other patrons
are using the device.) Patrons are also concerned about being given accurate information that is
presented in such a way that they can learn something from it (why else would they access the
kiosk if not to try and learn what it has been developed to teach?)
2
Matthew Korich
Matthew Korich
Weekly Readings
How the weeks assigned readings contributed to this analysis
Hoffler and Leutner discuss how animations are most powerful when they instructionally
relevant (p. 735) using the data that this article brought together and the calculations included to
prove the above statement it should be relatively easy to convince Ben the SME that the high end
animations he wants included should at least be tied to the instruction as opposed to simply being
something that would be decorational. This could lead to a compromise that helps the design stay
Matthew Korich
on budget but still allows Ben to have some sort of higher end animation included (one that
pertains directly to the instruction that the kiosk will be providing.)
Sung and Mayer discuss the different types of media /graphics that can be used and how
their effects differ based on how they are paired. Comparing decorational graphics with
instructional graphics along with their being paired with instructional texts shows varied results
with the shows that pairing instructional graphics with instructional text has a significant effect
on learning and understanding the content. This fact should be helpful again in persuading Ben
and Laura that what they should be most interested in is animations and graphics that are
meaningful to the learning taking place as opposed to simply interesting animations that may
actually distract learners from the intended goal of the finished product.
How does previous experiences contribute to analysis?
The Craig Gregerson case was an interesting case that compares with this situation in a
way. Craig had to deal with multiple sides of a company who disagreed about what the company
needed as a whole and as a result major schisms occurred within the company. Craig's main goal
in theory should have been to get the opposing sides to meet and finally discuss their reasons for
their opinions and attempt to reach a compromise that would allow Craig's design to meet the
needs of all parties involved as fully as possible. Lynn has a similar dilemma it seems that her
company and the client/SME may have different understandings of what their budget will allow
for in the creation of this product, so a meeting where all interested parties can be in attendance
should be scheduled where both sides can more fully discuss what they want to see versus what
the budget will allow for and begin the development of compromises wherever necessary.
Reasonable Solutions
5
Matthew Korich
Matthew Korich
If successful, Lynn will know for sure what is expected to be in the final product and
there will be few surprises throughout the remainder of the design process. This will also give
all parties involved a clearer understanding of the work involved in designing such a product.
4. Cons
There is a possibility that the client could remain adamant that they need certain aspects
of their ideas included in the design without any budget increases which could lead to them
taking their business elsewhere.
Second solution & description of how each addresses
Lynn could focus on developing a solution for the problem of catering to all Patrons as
opposed to just those who speak and read English well. Developing an alternative that allows
people who speak other languages or are from different cultures or generations to universally
understand the information provided at the kiosk is an important aspect of the design.
1. Challenges
Developing a solution that is simple yet effective for many different types of people.
Remaining within the clients budgetary scope while still providing requested aspects of the
design.
2. Case-specific constraints
The types of patrons that come to the aquarium are incredibly varied which could
complicate the process of making the kiosk more of a universal learning tool.
Matthew Korich
3. Pros
Finding this solution would make the kiosk much more user friendly for all audience
member, no matter who they are. The client would be very pleased as it is one aspect that they
are most concerned about.
4. Cons
A simple solution may not be easy to develop. Even a simple solution (such as using
pictures/graphics and simple animations could offset the budget and lead to requiring more cuts
from other areas of the product.
Final Recommendation
I would recommend that Lynn Follow the first recommended solution. Finding a time to
meet with all parties involved and come to an agreement about what is feasible and what is not.
Without this information Lynn could begin the design process and find that much of the work she
creates may not be used in the final product to assist in staying within budget. If the client does
refuse to change their plans for the final product the only thing Lynn can do is try her best to
convince them that in order to have all the features that they want their current budget will not
suffice. She needs to come to this meeting prepared with solid information about the costs of the
designs in mind, with examples of previous products and their associated costs to show her
clients that there is only so much that she can produce on such a limited budget. If her clients
were to decide that this disagreement about the budget was enough to justify that they take their
product elsewhere then perhaps Lynn should do her best to assure them that Telopea has a long
standing history of high quality work and that no matter what firm they do chose to work with,
the quality of product that they desire will require a larger budget.
8