The document discusses the evolution of rhyming schemes in Italian sonnets. It notes that an abba, abba pattern became standard for the octave, while the sestet allowed two variants: cdd, cde or cdc, cdc. Over time other variants like cdcdcd were introduced. Petrarch typically used abba, abba for the octave followed by either cde, cde or cdc, cdc for the sestet.
The document discusses the evolution of rhyming schemes in Italian sonnets. It notes that an abba, abba pattern became standard for the octave, while the sestet allowed two variants: cdd, cde or cdc, cdc. Over time other variants like cdcdcd were introduced. Petrarch typically used abba, abba for the octave followed by either cde, cde or cdc, cdc for the sestet.
The document discusses the evolution of rhyming schemes in Italian sonnets. It notes that an abba, abba pattern became standard for the octave, while the sestet allowed two variants: cdd, cde or cdc, cdc. Over time other variants like cdcdcd were introduced. Petrarch typically used abba, abba for the octave followed by either cde, cde or cdc, cdc for the sestet.
Later, the abba, abba pattern became the standard for Italian sonnets.
For the sestet there were two
different possibilities: cdd, cde and cdc, cdc. In time, other variants on this rhyming scheme were introduced, such as cdcdcd. Petrarch typically used an abba, abba pattern for the octave, followed by either cde, cde or cdc, cdc rhymes in the sestet. (The symmetries (abba vs. cdc) of these rhyme schemes have also been rendered in musical structure in the late 20th century composition Scrivo in Vento inspired by Petrarch's Sonnet 212, Beato in Sogno. [3]))