This rubric assesses ePortfolios based on four components: completeness and ease of access, evidence of learning, artifacts used, and personal reflection. Each component is rated on a scale from needs development to proficient to outstanding based on criteria such as connection between pages, courses completed, artifacts reflecting learning, and ability to synthesize and apply knowledge through reflection.
This rubric assesses ePortfolios based on four components: completeness and ease of access, evidence of learning, artifacts used, and personal reflection. Each component is rated on a scale from needs development to proficient to outstanding based on criteria such as connection between pages, courses completed, artifacts reflecting learning, and ability to synthesize and apply knowledge through reflection.
This rubric assesses ePortfolios based on four components: completeness and ease of access, evidence of learning, artifacts used, and personal reflection. Each component is rated on a scale from needs development to proficient to outstanding based on criteria such as connection between pages, courses completed, artifacts reflecting learning, and ability to synthesize and apply knowledge through reflection.
access- including connection between pages, validity of linkages, categories used, references, and design layout Evidence of learning-courses completion, theme adapted, timeline, advancement, approach (process). A synthesis and critical analysis of literature and technology resources Artefacts used-reflecting the learning process, technology skill, and appropriateness of artefacts Personal Reflection-linking to the theoretical/conceptual framework, reflective questions presence, ability to synthesize and apply knowledge and theories gained from courses, ability to generate research findings or link theory/research to practice,
Proficient
Outstanding
evidence of deeper and transformative
learning (evidence of behavioural change), cognitive reflection & metacognition analysis.