Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paragrap
h
Initial
Submission
Final, Revised
Submission
What You
Added/Omitted
and Why
#1
(Thesis
Statemen
t)
Similarities in
conventions such as title,
statistics, and depth of
analysis between the
three articles prove they
are part of the same
genre: post-game
reviews.
#2
Added a more
argumentative
topic sentence
because the
previous topic
sentence lacked
direction.
#3
ESPN uses
statistics to back its
claims about
players.
I omitted some
analysis of the
quote that was
description based
because it did not
add to my
argument.
#4
I added a
connection to
audience and more
clearly explained
why statistics
would appeal to
the targeted
audience of postgame reviews.
#5
Sports Illustrateds
presentation of the
game, but all of the
sources reviewed
key plays of the
game.
#6
I added clarity to
this paragraph by
rephrasing
sentences and
adding word
manipulate to
better convey my
message about
how sources can
fall within the
same genre but
still look very
different.
#7
Following preestablished
conventions of a
particular genre
makes an article
credible, but there
are still ways for
articles within the
same genre to be
unique.
I omitted my
comparison to
movie genres and
example of Killer
Pandas because it
did not flow and
seemed out of
place.